New balance in pluripotency: reprogramming with lineage specifiers

Regenerative Role of Lrig1+ Cells in Kidney Repair

Key Points

Lrig1 + cells exist long term during kidney homeostasis and become activated upon injury, contributing to regeneration. Lrig1 + cells and their progeny emerge during tubulogenesis and contribute to proximal tubule and inner medullary collecting duct development. Lrig1 + cells expand and differentiate into a mature nephron lineage in response to AKI to repair the proximal tubule.

Background

In response to severe kidney injury, the kidney epithelium displays remarkable regenerative capabilities driven by adaptable resident epithelial cells. To date, it has been widely considered that the adult kidney lacks multipotent stem cells; thus, the cellular lineages responsible for repairing proximal tubule damage are incompletely understood. Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domain protein 1–expressing cells (Lrig1 + cells) have been identified as a long-lived cell in various tissues that can induce epithelial tissue repair. Therefore, we hypothesized that Lrig1 + cells participate in kidney development and tissue regeneration.

Methods

We investigated the role of Lrig1 + cells in kidney injury using mouse models. The localization of Lrig1 + cells in the kidney was examined throughout mouse development. The function of Lrig1 + progeny cells in AKI repair was examined in vivo using a tamoxifen-inducible Lrig1 -specific Cre recombinase-based lineage tracing in three different kidney injury mouse models. In addition, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize the transcriptional signature of Lrig1 + cells and trace their progeny.

Results

Lrig1 + cells were present during kidney development and contributed to formation of the proximal tubule and collecting duct structures in mature mouse kidneys. In three-dimensional culture, single Lrig1 + cells demonstrated long-lasting propagation and differentiated into the proximal tubule and collecting duct lineages. These Lrig1 + proximal tubule cells highly expressed progenitor-like and quiescence-related genes, giving rise to a novel cluster of cells with regenerative potential in adult kidneys. Moreover, these long-lived Lrig1 + cells expanded and repaired damaged proximal tubule in response to three types of AKIs in mice.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the critical role of Lrig1 + cells in kidney regeneration.

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells with Substitutes for Yamanaka's Four Transcription Factors

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) share many characteristics with embryonic stem cells, but lack ethical controversy. They provide vast opportunities for disease modeling, pathogenesis understanding, therapeutic drug development, toxicology, organ synthesis, and treatment of degenerative disease. However, this procedure also has many potential challenges, including a slow generation time, low efficiency, partially reprogrammed colonies, as well as somatic coding mutations in the genome. Pioneered by Shinya Yamanaka's team in 2006, iPSCs were first generated by introducing four transcription factors: Oct 4, Sox 2, Klf 4, and c-Myc (OSKM). Of those factors, Klf 4 and c-Myc are oncogenes, which are potentially a tumor risk. Therefore, to avoid problems such as tumorigenesis and low throughput, one of the key strategies has been to use other methods, including members of the same subgroup of transcription factors, activators or inhibitors of signaling pathways, microRNAs, epigenetic modifiers, or even differentiation-associated factors, to functionally replace the reprogramming transcription factors. In this study, we will mainly focus on the advances in the generation of iPSCs with substitutes for OSKM. The identification and combination of novel proteins or chemicals, particularly small molecules, to induce pluripotency will provide useful tools to discover the molecular mechanisms governing reprogramming and ultimately lead to the development of new iPSC-based therapeutics for future clinical applications.

Oncometabolic Nuclear Reprogramming of Cancer Stemness

By impairing histone demethylation and locking cells into a reprogramming-prone state, oncometabolites can partially mimic the process of induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Using a systems biology approach, combining mathematical modeling, computation, and proof-of-concept studies with live cells, we found that an oncometabolite-driven pathological version of nuclear reprogramming increases the speed and efficiency of dedifferentiating committed epithelial cells into stem-like states with only a minimal core of stemness transcription factors. Our biomathematical model, which introduces nucleosome modification and epigenetic regulation of cell differentiation genes to account for the direct effects of oncometabolites on nuclear reprogramming, demonstrates that oncometabolites markedly lower the “energy barriers” separating non-stem and stem cell attractors, diminishes the average time of nuclear reprogramming, and increases the size of the basin of attraction of the macrostate occupied by stem cells. These findings establish the concept of oncometabolic nuclear reprogramming of stemness as a bona fide metabolo-epigenetic mechanism for generation of cancer stem-like cells.

•

Oncometabolites facilitate the reprogramming process evoked by stemness factors

•

Oncometabolites lower the epigenetic barriers to nuclear reprogramming

•

Cancer stem-like states arise through oncometabolic nuclear reprogramming phenomena

•

Oncometabolic regulation of epigenetics can drive stemness in cancer tissues

Concise Review: Progress and Challenges in Using Human Stem Cells for Biological and Therapeutics Discovery: Neuropsychiatric Disorders

In facing the daunting challenge of using human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells to study complex neural circuit disorders such as schizophrenia, mood and anxiety disorders, and autism spectrum disorders, a 2012 National Institute of Mental Health workshop produced a set of recommendations to advance basic research and engage industry in cell-based studies of neuropsychiatric disorders. This review describes progress in meeting these recommendations, including the development of novel tools, strides in recapitulating relevant cell and tissue types, insights into the genetic basis of these disorders that permit integration of risk-associated gene regulatory networks with cell/circuit phenotypes, and promising findings of patient-control differences using cell-based assays. However, numerous challenges are still being addressed, requiring further technological development, approaches to resolve disease heterogeneity, and collaborative structures for investigators of different disciplines. Additionally, since data obtained so far is on small sample sizes, replication in larger sample sets is needed. A number of individual success stories point to a path forward in developing assays to translate discovery science to therapeutics development.

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of reprogramming

Despite the profound and rapid advancements in reprogramming technologies since the generation of the first induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in 2006[1], the molecular basics of the process and its implications are still not fully understood. Recent work has suggested that a subset of TFs, so called "Pioneer TFs", play an important role during the stochastic phase of iPSC reprogramming [2-6]. Pioneer TFs activities differ from conventional transcription factors in their mechanism of action. They bind directly to condensed chromatin and elicit a series of chromatin remodeling events that lead to opening of the chromatin. Chromatin decondensation by pioneer factors progressively occurs during cell division and in turn exposes specific gene promoters in the DNA to which TFs can now directly bind to promoters that are readily accessible[2, 6]. Here, we will summarize recent advancements on our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying reprogramming to iPSC as well as the implications that pioneer Transcription Factor activities might play during different lineage conversion processes.

Mechanisms underlying the formation of induced pluripotent stem cells

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) offer unique opportunities for studying human biology, modeling diseases, and therapeutic applications. The simplest approach so far to generate human PSC lines is through reprogramming of somatic cells from an individual by defined factors, referred to simply as reprogramming. Reprogramming circumvents the ethical controversies associated with human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and nuclear transfer hESCs (nt-hESCs), and the resulting induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) retain the same basic genetic makeup as the somatic cell used for reprogramming. Since the first report of iPSCs by Takahashi and Yamanaka (Cell 2006, 126:663-676), the molecular mechanisms of reprogramming have been extensively investigated. A better mechanistic understanding of reprogramming is fundamental not only to iPSC biology and improving the quality of iPSCs for therapeutic use, but also to our understanding of the molecular basis of cell identity, pluripotency, and plasticity. Here, we summarize the genetic, epigenetic, and cellular events during reprogramming, and the roles of various factors identified thus far in the reprogramming process. WIREs Dev Biol 2016, 5:39-65. doi: 10.1002/wdev.206 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

GATA family members as inducers for cellular reprogramming to pluripotency

Members of the GATA protein family play important roles in lineage specification and transdifferentiation. Previous reports show that some members of the GATA protein family can also induce pluripotency in somatic cells by substituting for Oct4, a key pluripotency-associated factor. However, the mechanism linking lineage-specifying cues and the activation of pluripotency remains elusive. Here, we report that all GATA family members can substitute for Oct4 to induce pluripotency. We found that all members of the GATA family could inhibit the overrepresented ectodermal-lineage genes, which is consistent with previous reports indicating that a balance of different lineage-specifying forces is important for the restoration of pluripotency. A conserved zinc-finger DNA-binding domain in the C-terminus is critical for the GATA family to induce pluripotency. Using RNA-seq and ChIP-seq, we determined that the pluripotency-related gene Sall4 is a direct target of GATA family members during reprogramming and serves as a bridge linking the lineage-specifying GATA family to the pluripotency circuit. Thus, the GATA family is the first protein family of which all members can function as inducers of the reprogramming process and can substitute for Oct4. Our results suggest that the role of GATA family in reprogramming has been underestimated and that the GATA family may serve as an important mediator of cell fate conversion.

Ex Uno Plures: Molecular Designs for Embryonic Pluripotency

Pluripotent cells in embryos are situated near the apex of the hierarchy of developmental potential. They are capable of generating all cell types of the mammalian body proper. Therefore, they are the exemplar of stem cells. In vivo, pluripotent cells exist transiently and become expended within a few days of their establishment. Yet, when explanted into artificial culture conditions, they can be indefinitely propagated in vitro as pluripotent stem cell lines. A host of transcription factors and regulatory genes are now known to underpin the pluripotent state. Nonetheless, how pluripotent cells are equipped with their vast multilineage differentiation potential remains elusive. Consensus holds that pluripotency transcription factors prevent differentiation by inhibiting the expression of differentiation genes. However, this does not explain the developmental potential of pluripotent cells. We have presented another emergent perspective, namely, that pluripotency factors function as lineage specifiers that enable pluripotent cells to differentiate into specific lineages, therefore endowing pluripotent cells with their multilineage potential. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of the developmental biology, transcription factors, and extrinsic signaling associated with pluripotent cells, and their accompanying subtypes, in vitro heterogeneity and chromatin states. Although much has been learned since the appreciation of mammalian pluripotency in the 1950s and the derivation of embryonic stem cell lines in 1981, we will specifically emphasize what currently remains unclear. However, the view that pluripotency factors capacitate differentiation, recently corroborated by experimental evidence, might perhaps address the long-standing question of how pluripotent cells are endowed with their multilineage differentiation potential.

Reprogramming by lineage specifiers: blurring the lines between pluripotency and differentiation

The generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) has raised enormous expectations within the biomedical community due to their potential vast implications in regenerative and personalized medicine. However, reprogramming to iPS is still not fully comprehended. Difficulties found in ascribing specific molecular patterns to pluripotent cells (PSCs), and inherent inter-line and intra-line variability between different PSCs need to be resolved. Additionally, and despite multiple assumptions, it remains unclear whether the current in vitro culturing conditions for the maintenance and differentiation of PSCs do indeed recapitulate the developmental processes observed in vivo. As a consequence, basic questions such as what is the actual nature of PSCs remain unanswered and different theories have emerged in regards to the identity of these valuable cell population. Here we discuss on the published theories for defining PSC identity, the implications that the different postulated models have for the reprogramming field as well as speculate on potential future directions that might be opened once a precise knowledge on the nature of PSCs is accomplished.

Understanding the roadmaps to induced pluripotency

Somatic cells can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by ectopic expression of transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc. Recent advancements have shown that small-molecule compounds can induce pluripotency, indicating that cell fate can be regulated by direct manipulation of intrinsic cell signaling pathways, thereby innovating our current understanding of reprogramming. The fact that lineage specifiers can induce pluripotency suggests that the pluripotent state is a fine balance between competing differentiation forces. Dissection of pluripotent roadmaps indicates that reprogramming is a process of reverse development, involving a series of complicated and distinct reprogramming stages. Evidence from mouse iPSC transplantation studies demonstrated that some certain but not all cells derived from iPSCs are immunogenic. These studies provide new ways to minimize reprogramming-induced abnormalities and maximize reprogramming efficiency to facilitate clinical development and use of iPSCs.