1
|
Khan S, Baligar P, Tandon C, Nayyar J, Tandon S. Molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer and the role of targeted therapy. Life Sci 2024; 336:122270. [PMID: 37979833 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Data collected from large-scale studies has shown that the incidence of prostate cancer globally is on the rise, which could be attributed to an overall increase in lifespan. So, the question is how has modern science with all its new technologies and clinical breakthroughs mitigated or managed this disease? The answer is not a simple one as prostate cancer exhibits various subtypes, each with its unique characteristics or signatures which creates challenges in treatment. To understand the complexity of prostate cancer these signatures must be deciphered. Molecular studies of prostate cancer samples have identified certain genetic and epigenetic alterations, which are instrumental in tumorigenesis. Some of these candidates include the androgen receptor (AR), various oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and the tumor microenvironment, which serve as major drivers that lead to cancer progression. These aberrant genes and their products can give an insight into prostate cancer development and progression by acting as potent markers to guide future therapeutic approaches. Thus, understanding the complexity of prostate cancer is crucial for targeting specific markers and tailoring treatments accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabiha Khan
- Amity Institute of Molecular Medicine, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Prakash Baligar
- Amity Institute of Molecular Medicine, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Chanderdeep Tandon
- Amity School of Biological Sciences, Amity University Punjab, Mohali, India
| | - Jasamrit Nayyar
- Department of Chemistry, Goswami Ganesh Dutt Sanatan Dharam College, Chandigarh, India
| | - Simran Tandon
- Amity School of Health Sciences, Amity University Punjab, Mohali, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Challis D, Lippis T, Wilson R, Wilkinson E, Dickinson J, Black A, Azimi I, Holloway A, Taberlay P, Brettingham-Moore K. Multiomics analysis of adaptation to repeated DNA damage in prostate cancer cells. Epigenetics 2023; 18:2214047. [PMID: 37196186 DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2214047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA damage is frequently utilized as the basis for cancer therapies; however, resistance to DNA damage remains one of the biggest challenges for successful treatment outcomes. Critically, the molecular drivers behind resistance are poorly understood. To address this question, we created an isogenic model of prostate cancer exhibiting more aggressive characteristics to better understand the molecular signatures associated with resistance and metastasis. 22Rv1 cells were repeatedly exposed to DNA damage daily for 6 weeks, similar to patient treatment regimes. Using Illumina Methylation EPIC arrays and RNA-seq, we compared DNA methylation and transcriptional profiles between the parental 22Rv1 cell line and the lineage exposed to prolonged DNA damage. Here we show that repeated DNA damage drives the molecular evolution of cancer cells to a more aggressive phenotype and identify molecular candidates behind this process. Total DNA methylation was increased while RNA-seq demonstrated these cells had dysregulated expression of genes involved in metabolism and the unfolded protein response (UPR) with Asparagine synthetase (ASNS) identified as central to this process. Despite the limited overlap between RNA-seq and DNA methylation, oxoglutarate dehydrogenase-like (OGDHL) was identified as altered in both data sets. Utilising a second approach we profiled the proteome in 22Rv1 cells following a single dose of radiotherapy. This analysis also highlighted the UPR in response to DNA damage. Together, these analyses identified dysregulation of metabolism and the UPR and identified ASNS and OGDHL as candidates for resistance to DNA damage. This work provides critical insight into molecular changes which underpin treatment resistance and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Challis
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - T Lippis
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - R Wilson
- Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - E Wilkinson
- Menzies Institute of Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - J Dickinson
- Menzies Institute of Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - A Black
- Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - I Azimi
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - A Holloway
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - P Taberlay
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - K Brettingham-Moore
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Itai Y, Rappoport N, Shamir R. Integration of gene expression and DNA methylation data across different experiments. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:7762-7776. [PMID: 37395437 PMCID: PMC10450176 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Integrative analysis of multi-omic datasets has proven to be extremely valuable in cancer research and precision medicine. However, obtaining multimodal data from the same samples is often difficult. Integrating multiple datasets of different omics remains a challenge, with only a few available algorithms developed to solve it. Here, we present INTEND (IntegratioN of Transcriptomic and EpigeNomic Data), a novel algorithm for integrating gene expression and DNA methylation datasets covering disjoint sets of samples. To enable integration, INTEND learns a predictive model between the two omics by training on multi-omic data measured on the same set of samples. In comprehensive testing on 11 TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) cancer datasets spanning 4329 patients, INTEND achieves significantly superior results compared with four state-of-the-art integration algorithms. We also demonstrate INTEND's ability to uncover connections between DNA methylation and the regulation of gene expression in the joint analysis of two lung adenocarcinoma single-omic datasets from different sources. INTEND's data-driven approach makes it a valuable multi-omic data integration tool. The code for INTEND is available at https://github.com/Shamir-Lab/INTEND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonatan Itai
- Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Nimrod Rappoport
- Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Ron Shamir
- Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shin HJ, Hua JT, Li H. Recent advances in understanding DNA methylation of prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1182727. [PMID: 37234978 PMCID: PMC10206257 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1182727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, is widely studied in cancer. DNA methylation patterns have been shown to distinguish between benign and malignant tumors in various cancers, including prostate cancer. It may also contribute to oncogenesis, as it is frequently associated with downregulation of tumor suppressor genes. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, in particular the CpG island hypermethylator phenotype (CIMP), have shown associative evidence with distinct clinical features and outcomes, such as aggressive subtypes, higher Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and overall tumor stage, overall worse prognosis, as well as reduced survival. In prostate cancer, hypermethylation of specific genes is significantly different between tumor and normal tissues. Methylation patterns could distinguish between aggressive subtypes of prostate cancer, including neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and castration resistant prostate adenocarcinoma. Further, DNA methylation is detectable in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and is reflective of clinical outcome, making it a potential biomarker for prostate cancer. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding DNA methylation alterations in cancers with the focus on prostate cancer. We discuss the advanced methodology used for evaluating DNA methylation changes and the molecular regulators behind these changes. We also explore the clinical potential of DNA methylation as prostate cancer biomarkers and its potential for developing targeted treatment of CIMP subtype of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin Shin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Haolong Li
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Epigenetic mechanisms underlying subtype heterogeneity and tumor recurrence in prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2023; 14:567. [PMID: 36732329 PMCID: PMC9895058 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36253-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
6
|
Kim SS, Lee SC, Lim B, Shin SH, Kim MY, Kim SY, Lim H, Charton C, Shin D, Moon HW, Kim J, Park D, Park WY, Lee JY. DNA methylation biomarkers distinguishing early-stage prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Int 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
7
|
Xu C, Zhao S, Cai L. Epigenetic (De)regulation in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 190:321-360. [PMID: 38113006 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-45654-1_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease exhibiting both genetic and epigenetic deregulations. Epigenetic alterations are defined as changes not based on DNA sequence, which include those of DNA methylation, histone modification, and chromatin remodeling. Androgen receptor (AR) is the main driver for PCa and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a backbone treatment for patients with PCa; however, ADT resistance almost inevitably occurs and advanced diseases develop termed castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), due to both genetic and epigenetic changes. Due to the reversible nature of epigenetic modifications, inhibitors targeting epigenetic factors have become promising anti-cancer agents. In this chapter, we focus on recent studies about the dysregulation of epigenetic regulators crucially involved in the initiation, development, and progression of PCa and discuss the potential use of inhibitors targeting epigenetic modifiers for treatment of advanced PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenxi Xu
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Ling Cai
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugimachi K, Araki H, Saito H, Masuda T, Miura F, Inoue K, Shimagaki T, Mano Y, Iguchi T, Morita M, Toh Y, Yoshizumi T, Ito T, Mimori K. Persistent epigenetic alterations in transcription factors after a sustained virological response in hepatocellular carcinoma. JGH Open 2022; 6:854-863. [PMID: 36514506 PMCID: PMC9730721 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists in a condition of sustained virologic response (SVR) after hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication. Comprehensive molecular analyses were performed to test the hypothesis that epigenetic abnormalities present after an SVR play a role in hepatocarcinogenesis. Methods Whole-genome methylome and RNA sequencing were performed on HCV, SVR, and healthy liver tissue. Integrated analysis of the sequencing data focused on expression changes in transcription factors and their target genes, commonly found in HCV and SVR. Identified expression changes were validated in demethylated cultured HCC cell lines and an independent validation cohort. Results The coincidence rates of the differentially methylated regions between the HCV and SVR groups were 91% in the hypomethylated and 71% in the hypermethylated regions in tumorous tissues, and 37% in the hypomethylated and 36% in the hypermethylated regions in non-tumorous tissues. These results indicate that many epigenomic abnormalities persist even after an SVR was achieved. Integrated analysis identified 61 transcription factors and 379 other genes that had methylation abnormalities and gene expression changes in both groups. Validation cohort specified gene expression changes for 14 genes, and gene ontology pathway analysis revealed apoptotic signaling and inflammatory response were associated with these genes. Conclusion This study demonstrates that DNA methylation abnormalities, retained after HCV eradication, affect the expression of transcription factors and their target genes. These findings suggest that DNA methylation in SVR patients may be functionally important in carcinogenesis, and could serve as biomarkers to predict HCC occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keishi Sugimachi
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Hiromitsu Araki
- Department of Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan,Department of Business and Technology Management, Faculty of EconomicsKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Hideyuki Saito
- Department of SurgeryKyushu University Beppu HospitalBeppuJapan
| | - Takaaki Masuda
- Department of SurgeryKyushu University Beppu HospitalBeppuJapan
| | - Fumihito Miura
- Department of Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Kentaro Inoue
- Department of Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan,Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomonari Shimagaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Yohei Mano
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomohiro Iguchi
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Masaru Morita
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Yasushi Toh
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer CenterFukuokaJapan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Takashi Ito
- Department of Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Koshi Mimori
- Department of SurgeryKyushu University Beppu HospitalBeppuJapan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao Y, Hu X, Yu H, Liu X, Sun H, Shao C. Alternations of gene expression in PI3K and AR pathways and DNA methylation features contribute to metastasis of prostate cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 2022; 79:436. [PMID: 35864178 PMCID: PMC11072339 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04456-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The molecular heterogeneity of prostate cancer (PCa) gives rise to distinct tumor subclasses based on epigenetic modification and gene expression signatures. Identification of clinically actionable molecular subtypes of PCa is key to improving patient outcome, and the balance between specific pathways may influence PCa outcome. It is also urgent to identify progression-related markers through cytosine-guanine (CpG) methylation in predicting metastasis for patients with PCa. METHODS We performed bioinformatics analysis of transcriptomic, and clinical data in an integrated cohort of 551 prostate samples. The datasets included retrospective The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts. Two algorithms, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination, were used to select significant CpGs. RESULTS We found that PCa progression is more likely to occur after the third year through conditional survival (CS) analysis, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a better predictor of Progression-free survival (PFS) than Gleason score (GS). Our study first demonstrated that PCa tumors have distinct expression profiles based on the expression of genes involved in androgen receptor (AR) and PI3K-AKT, which influence disease outcome. Our results also indicated that there are multiple phenotypes relevant to the AR-PI3K axis in PCa, where tumors with mixed phenotype may be more aggressive or have worse outcome than quiescent phenotype. In terms of epigenetics, we obtained CpG sites and their corresponding genes which have a good predictive value of PFS. However, various evidences showed that the predictive value of CpGs corresponding genes was much lower than GpG sites in Overall survival (OS) and PFS. CONCLUSIONS PCa classification specific to AR and PI3K pathways provides novel biological insight into previously established PCa subtypes and may help develop personalized therapies. Our results support the potential clinical utility of DNA methylation signatures to distinguish tumor metastasis and to predict prognosis and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhao
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China
| | - Xin Hu
- School of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
| | - Haoran Yu
- School of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
| | - Xin Liu
- School of Life Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
| | - Huimin Sun
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China
| | - Chen Shao
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lipid Metabolism and Epigenetics Crosstalk in Prostate Cancer. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14040851. [PMID: 35215499 PMCID: PMC8874497 DOI: 10.3390/nu14040851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignant neoplasm in men in the Western world. Localized low-risk PCa has an excellent prognosis thanks to effective local treatments; however, despite the incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, metastatic PCa remains incurable mainly due to disease heterogeneity and the development of resistance to therapy. The mechanisms underlying PCa progression and therapy resistance are multiple and include metabolic reprogramming, especially in relation to lipid metabolism, as well as epigenetic remodelling, both of which enable cancer cells to adapt to dynamic changes in the tumour. Interestingly, metabolism and epigenetics are interconnected. Metabolism can regulate epigenetics through the direct influence of metabolites on epigenetic processes, while epigenetics can control metabolism by directly or indirectly regulating the expression of metabolic genes. Moreover, epidemiological studies suggest an association between a high-fat diet, which can alter the availability of metabolites, and PCa progression. Here, we review the alterations of lipid metabolism and epigenetics in PCa, before focusing on the mechanisms that connect them. We also discuss the influence of diet in this scenario. This information may help to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers as well as targetable vulnerabilities.
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu P. Pan-Cancer DNA Methylation Analysis and Tumor Origin Identification of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site Based on Multi-Omics. Front Genet 2022; 12:798748. [PMID: 35069697 PMCID: PMC8770539 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.798748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The metastatic cancer of unknown primary (CUP) sites remains a leading cause of cancer death with few therapeutic options. The aberrant DNA methylation (DNAm) is the most important risk factor for cancer, which has certain tissue specificity. However, how DNAm alterations in tumors differ among the regulatory network of multi-omics remains largely unexplored. Therefore, there is room for improvement in our accuracy in the prediction of tumor origin sites and a need for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In our study, an integrative analysis based on multi-omics data and molecular regulatory network uncovered genome-wide methylation mechanism and identified 23 epi-driver genes. Apart from the promoter region, we also found that the aberrant methylation within the gene body or intergenic region was significantly associated with gene expression. Significant enrichment analysis of the epi-driver genes indicated that these genes were highly related to cellular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, including T-cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and signal transduction. Based on the ensemble algorithm, six CpG sites located in five epi-driver genes were selected to construct a tissue-specific classifier with a better accuracy (>95%) using TCGA datasets. In the independent datasets and the metastatic cancer datasets from GEO, the accuracy of distinguishing tumor subtypes or original sites was more than 90%, showing better robustness and stability. In summary, the integration analysis of large-scale omics data revealed complex regulation of DNAm across various cancer types and identified the epi-driver genes participating in tumorigenesis. Based on the aberrant methylation status located in epi-driver genes, a classifier that provided the highest accuracy in tracing back to the primary sites of metastatic cancer was established. Our study provides a comprehensive and multi-omics view of DNAm-associated changes across cancer types and has potential for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center For Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Palicelli A, Bonacini M, Croci S, Magi-Galluzzi C, Cañete-Portillo S, Chaux A, Bisagni A, Zanetti E, De Biase D, Melli B, Sanguedolce F, Ragazzi M, Bonasoni MP, Soriano A, Ascani S, Zizzo M, Castro Ruiz C, De Leo A, Giordano G, Landriscina M, Carrieri G, Cormio L, Berney DM, Athanazio D, Gandhi J, Cavazza A, Santandrea G, Tafuni A, Zanelli M. What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 1: Focus on Immunohistochemical Results with Discussion of Pre-Analytical and Interpretation Variables. Cells 2021; 10:cells10113166. [PMID: 34831389 PMCID: PMC8625301 DOI: 10.3390/cells10113166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy targeting the PD-1-PD-L1 axis yielded good results in treating different immunologically ''hot'' tumors. A phase II study revealed good therapeutic activity of pembrolizumab in selected prostatic carcinoma (PC)-patients. We performed a systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines), which analyzes the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 in human PC samples and highlights the pre-analytical and interpretation variables. Interestingly, 29% acinar PCs, 7% ductal PCs, and 46% neuroendocrine carcinomas/tumors were PD-L1+ on immunohistochemistry. Different scoring methods or cut-off criteria were applied on variable specimen-types, evaluating tumors showing different clinic-pathologic features. The positivity rate of different PD-L1 antibody clones in tumor cells ranged from 3% (SP142) to 50% (ABM4E54), excluding the single case tested for RM-320. The most tested clone was E1L3N, followed by 22C3 (most used for pembrolizumab eligibility), SP263, SP142, and 28-8, which gave the positivity rates of 35%, 11-41% (depending on different scoring systems), 6%, 3%, and 15%, respectively. Other clones were tested in <200 cases. The PD-L1 positivity rate was usually higher in tumors than benign tissues. It was higher in non-tissue microarray specimens (41-50% vs. 15%), as PC cells frequently showed heterogenous or focal PD-L1-staining. PD-L1 was expressed by immune or stromal cells in 12% and 69% cases, respectively. Tumor heterogeneity, inter-institutional preanalytics, and inter-observer interpretation variability may account for result biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0522-296-864; Fax: +39-0522-296-945
| | - Martina Bonacini
- Clinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stefania Croci
- Clinical Immunology, Allergy and Advanced Biotechnologies Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (C.M.-G.); (S.C.-P.)
| | - Sofia Cañete-Portillo
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; (C.M.-G.); (S.C.-P.)
| | - Alcides Chaux
- Department of Scientific Research, School of Postgraduate Studies Norte University, Asunción 1614, Paraguay;
| | - Alessandra Bisagni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Eleonora Zanetti
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Dario De Biase
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FABIT), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Beatrice Melli
- Fertility Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | | | - Moira Ragazzi
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maria Paola Bonasoni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Alessandra Soriano
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;
- Gastroenterology Division, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefano Ascani
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy;
- Haematopathology Unit, CREO, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Zizzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Carolina Castro Ruiz
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Azienda USL Bologna, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Guido Giordano
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.G.); (M.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; (G.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Daniel M. Berney
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 5PZ, UK;
| | | | - Jatin Gandhi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Alberto Cavazza
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Giacomo Santandrea
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Tafuni
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.B.); (E.Z.); (M.R.); (M.P.B.); (A.C.); (G.S.); (A.T.); (M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
SPOP mutation induces DNA methylation via stabilizing GLP/G9a. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5716. [PMID: 34588438 PMCID: PMC8481544 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25951-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in SPOP E3 ligase gene are reportedly associated with genome-wide DNA hypermethylation in prostate cancer (PCa) although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that SPOP binds and promotes polyubiquitination and degradation of histone methyltransferase and DNMT interactor GLP. SPOP mutation induces stabilization of GLP and its partner protein G9a and aberrant upregulation of global DNA hypermethylation in cultured PCa cells and primary PCa specimens. Genome-wide DNA methylome analysis shows that a subset of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) including FOXO3, GATA5, and NDRG1, are hypermethylated and downregulated in SPOP-mutated PCa cells. DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine effectively reverses expression of the TSGs examined, inhibits SPOP-mutated PCa cell growth in vitro and in mice, and enhances docetaxel anti-cancer efficacy. Our findings reveal the GLP/G9a-DNMT module as a mediator of DNA hypermethylation in SPOP-mutated PCa. They suggest that SPOP mutation could be a biomarker for effective treatment of PCa with DNA methylation inhibitor alone or in combination with taxane chemotherapeutics. The molecular mechanism underlying the DNA hypermethylation phenotype observed in the SPOP-mutant prostate cancers is unclear. Here, the authors show that mutant SPOP induces global aberrant DNA methylation patterns through GLP/G9a and renders prostate cancer cells susceptible to DNA demethylating agents.
Collapse
|
14
|
Silva R, Moran B, Baird AM, O'Rourke CJ, Finn SP, McDermott R, Watson W, Gallagher WM, Brennan DJ, Perry AS. Longitudinal analysis of individual cfDNA methylome patterns in metastatic prostate cancer. Clin Epigenetics 2021; 13:168. [PMID: 34454584 PMCID: PMC8403420 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Disease progression and therapeutic resistance are hallmarks of advanced stage prostate cancer (PCa), which remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality around the world. Longitudinal studies, coupled with the use of liquid biopsies, offer a potentially new and minimally invasive platform to study the dynamics of tumour progression. Our aim was to investigate the dynamics of personal DNA methylomic profiles of metastatic PCa (mPCa) patients, during disease progression and therapy administration. Results Forty-eight plasma samples from 9 mPCa patients were collected, longitudinally, over 13–21 months. After circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation, DNA methylation was profiled using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip. The top 5% most variable probes across time, within each individual, were utilised to study dynamic methylation patterns during disease progression and therapeutic response. Statistical testing was carried out to identify differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in cfDNA, which were subsequently validated in two independent mPCa (cfDNA and FFPE tissue) cohorts. Individual cfDNA global methylation patterns were temporally stable throughout the disease course. However, a proportion of CpG sites presented a dynamic temporal pattern that was consistent with clinical events, including different therapies, and were prominently associated with genes linked to immune response pathways. Additionally, study of the tumour fraction of cfDNA identified > 2000 DMGs with dynamic methylation patterns. Conclusions Longitudinal assessment of cfDNA methylation in mPCa patients unveiled dynamic patterns associated with disease progression and therapy administration, thus highlighting the potential of using liquid biopsies to study PCa evolution at a methylomic level. ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-021-01155-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Silva
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Biology and Environmental Science, Science West, O'Brien Science Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Bruce Moran
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Baird
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colm J O'Rourke
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stephen P Finn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Histopathology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ray McDermott
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - William Watson
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - William M Gallagher
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donal J Brennan
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Antoinette S Perry
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. .,School of Biology and Environmental Science, Science West, O'Brien Science Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Elucidation of the Genomic-Epigenomic Interaction Landscape of Aggressive Prostate Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:6641429. [PMID: 33511206 PMCID: PMC7825361 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6641429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Majority of prostate cancer (PCa) deaths are attributed to localized high-grade aggressive tumours which progress rapidly to metastatic disease. A critical unmet need in clinical management of PCa is discovery and characterization of the molecular drivers of aggressive tumours. The development and progression of aggressive PCa involve genetic and epigenetic alterations occurring in the germline, somatic (tumour), and epigenomes. To date, interactions between genes containing germline, somatic, and epigenetic mutations in aggressive PCa have not been characterized. The objective of this investigation was to elucidate the genomic-epigenomic interaction landscape in aggressive PCa to identify potential drivers aggressive PCa and the pathways they control. We hypothesized that aggressive PCa originates from a complex interplay between genomic (both germline and somatic mutations) and epigenomic alterations. We further hypothesized that these complex arrays of interacting genomic and epigenomic factors affect gene expression, molecular networks, and signaling pathways which in turn drive aggressive PCa. Methods We addressed these hypotheses by performing integrative data analysis combining information on germline mutations from genome-wide association studies with somatic and epigenetic mutations from The Cancer Genome Atlas using gene expression as the intermediate phenotype. Results The investigation revealed signatures of genes containing germline, somatic, and epigenetic mutations associated with aggressive PCa. Aberrant DNA methylation had effect on gene expression. In addition, the investigation revealed molecular networks and signalling pathways enriched for germline, somatic, and epigenetic mutations including the STAT3, PTEN, PCa, ATM, AR, and P53 signalling pathways implicated in aggressive PCa. Conclusions The study demonstrated that integrative analysis combining diverse omics data is a powerful approach for the discovery of potential clinically actionable biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and elucidation of oncogenic interactions between genomic and epigenomic alterations in aggressive PCa.
Collapse
|
16
|
MYC DNA Methylation in Prostate Tumor Tissue Is Associated with Gleason Score. Genes (Basel) 2020; 12:genes12010012. [PMID: 33374332 PMCID: PMC7823928 DOI: 10.3390/genes12010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests a role of epigenetic mechanisms at chromosome 8q24, an important cancer genetic susceptibility region, in prostate cancer. We investigated whether MYC DNA methylation at 8q24 (six CpG sites from exon 3 to the 3′ UTR) in prostate tumor was associated with tumor aggressiveness (based on Gleason score, GS), and we incorporated RNA expression data to investigate the function. We accessed radical prostatectomy tissue for 50 Caucasian and 50 African American prostate cancer patients at the University of Maryland Medical Center, selecting an equal number of GS 6 and GS 7 cases per group. MYC DNA methylation was lower in tumor than paired normal prostate tissue for all six CpG sites (median difference: −14.74 to −0.20 percentage points), and we observed similar results for two nearby sites in The Cancer Genome Atlas (p < 0.0001). We observed significantly lower methylation for more aggressive (GS 7) than less aggressive (GS 6) tumors for three exon 3 sites (for CpG 212 (chr8:128753145), GS 6 median = 89.7%; GS 7 median = 85.8%; p-value = 9.4 × 10−4). MYC DNA methylation was not associated with MYC expression, but was inversely associated with PRNCR1 expression after multiple comparison adjustment (q-value = 0.04). Findings suggest that prostate tumor MYC exon 3 hypomethylation is associated with increased aggressiveness.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lam D, Clark S, Stirzaker C, Pidsley R. Advances in Prognostic Methylation Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2993. [PMID: 33076494 PMCID: PMC7602626 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a major clinical need for accurate biomarkers for prostate cancer prognosis, to better inform treatment strategies and disease monitoring. Current clinically recognised prognostic factors, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, lack sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing aggressive from indolent disease, particularly in patients with localised intermediate grade prostate cancer. There has therefore been a major focus on identifying molecular biomarkers that can add prognostic value to existing markers, including investigation of DNA methylation, which has a known role in tumorigenesis. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of DNA methylation biomarker studies in prostate cancer prognosis, and highlight the advances that have been made in this field. We cover the numerous studies into well-established candidate genes, and explore the technological transition that has enabled hypothesis-free genome-wide studies and the subsequent discovery of novel prognostic genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilys Lam
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; (D.L.); (S.C.); (C.S.)
| | - Susan Clark
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; (D.L.); (S.C.); (C.S.)
- St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
| | - Clare Stirzaker
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; (D.L.); (S.C.); (C.S.)
- St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
| | - Ruth Pidsley
- Epigenetics Research Laboratory, Genomics and Epigenetics Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; (D.L.); (S.C.); (C.S.)
- St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Patel SK, George B, Rai V. Artificial Intelligence to Decode Cancer Mechanism: Beyond Patient Stratification for Precision Oncology. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1177. [PMID: 32903628 PMCID: PMC7438594 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The multitude of multi-omics data generated cost-effectively using advanced high-throughput technologies has imposed challenging domain for research in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Data curation poses a significant challenge as different parameters, instruments, and sample preparations approaches are employed for generating these big data sets. AI could reduce the fuzziness and randomness in data handling and build a platform for the data ecosystem, and thus serve as the primary choice for data mining and big data analysis to make informed decisions. However, AI implication remains intricate for researchers/clinicians lacking specific training in computational tools and informatics. Cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths in 2018. Certain cancers, such as pancreatic and gastric cancers, are detected only after they have reached their advanced stages with frequent relapses. Cancer is one of the most complex diseases affecting a range of organs with diverse disease progression mechanisms and the effectors ranging from gene-epigenetics to a wide array of metabolites. Hence a comprehensive study, including genomics, epi-genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, along with the medical/mass-spectrometry imaging, patient clinical history, treatments provided, genetics, and disease endemicity, is essential. Cancer Moonshot℠ Research Initiatives by NIH National Cancer Institute aims to collect as much information as possible from different regions of the world and make a cancer data repository. AI could play an immense role in (a) analysis of complex and heterogeneous data sets (multi-omics and/or inter-omics), (b) data integration to provide a holistic disease molecular mechanism, (c) identification of diagnostic and prognostic markers, and (d) monitor patient's response to drugs/treatments and recovery. AI enables precision disease management well beyond the prevalent disease stratification patterns, such as differential expression and supervised classification. This review highlights critical advances and challenges in omics data analysis, dealing with data variability from lab-to-lab, and data integration. We also describe methods used in data mining and AI methods to obtain robust results for precision medicine from "big" data. In the future, AI could be expanded to achieve ground-breaking progress in disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip Kumar Patel
- Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
- Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, United States
| | - Bhawana George
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Vineeta Rai
- Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhao SG, Chen WS, Li H, Foye A, Zhang M, Sjöström M, Aggarwal R, Playdle D, Liao A, Alumkal JJ, Das R, Chou J, Hua JT, Barnard TJ, Bailey AM, Chow ED, Perry MD, Dang HX, Yang R, Moussavi-Baygi R, Zhang L, Alshalalfa M, Laura Chang S, Houlahan KE, Shiah YJ, Beer TM, Thomas G, Chi KN, Gleave M, Zoubeidi A, Reiter RE, Rettig MB, Witte O, Yvonne Kim M, Fong L, Spratt DE, Morgan TM, Bose R, Huang FW, Li H, Chesner L, Shenoy T, Goodarzi H, Asangani IA, Sandhu S, Lang JM, Mahajan NP, Lara PN, Evans CP, Febbo P, Batzoglou S, Knudsen KE, He HH, Huang J, Zwart W, Costello JF, Luo J, Tomlins SA, Wyatt AW, Dehm SM, Ashworth A, Gilbert LA, Boutros PC, Farh K, Chinnaiyan AM, Maher CA, Small EJ, Quigley DA, Feng FY. The DNA methylation landscape of advanced prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2020; 52:778-789. [PMID: 32661416 PMCID: PMC7454228 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0648-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Although DNA methylation is a key regulator of gene expression, the comprehensive methylation landscape of metastatic cancer has never been defined. Through whole-genome bisulfite sequencing paired with deep whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing of 100 castration-resistant prostate metastases, we discovered alterations affecting driver genes only detectable with integrated whole-genome approaches. Notably, we observed that 22% of tumors exhibited a novel epigenomic subtype associated with hyper-methylation and somatic mutations in TET2, DNMT3B, IDH1, and BRAF. We also identified intergenic regions where methylation is associated with RNA expression of the oncogenic driver genes AR, MYC and ERG. Finally, we showed that differential methylation during progression preferentially occurs at somatic mutational hotspots and putative regulatory regions. This study is a large integrated study of whole-genome, whole-methylome and whole-transcriptome sequencing in metastatic cancer and provides a comprehensive overview of the important regulatory role of methylation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - William S Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Haolong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adam Foye
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denise Playdle
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Joshi J Alumkal
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rajdeep Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Junjie T Hua
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Travis J Barnard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adina M Bailey
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric D Chow
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Advanced Technology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marc D Perry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ha X Dang
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rendong Yang
- The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN, USA
| | - Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mohammed Alshalalfa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Laura Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen E Houlahan
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yu-Jia Shiah
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - George Thomas
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amina Zoubeidi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Owen Witte
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M Yvonne Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rohit Bose
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Franklin W Huang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Chesner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tanushree Shenoy
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hani Goodarzi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irfan A Asangani
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua M Lang
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nupam P Mahajan
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Primo N Lara
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Housheng H He
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph F Costello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jianhua Luo
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott M Dehm
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Luke A Gilbert
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Arul M Chinnaiyan
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher A Maher
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric J Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David A Quigley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hernandez Puente CV, Hsu PC, Rogers LJ, Jousheghany F, Siegel E, Kadlubar SA, Beck JT, Makhoul I, Hutchins LF, Kieber-Emmons T, Monzavi-Karbassi B. Association of DNA-Methylation Profiles With Immune Responses Elicited in Breast Cancer Patients Immunized With a Carbohydrate-Mimicking Peptide: A Pilot Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:879. [PMID: 32582547 PMCID: PMC7290046 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune response to a given antigen, particularly in cancer patients, is complex and is controlled by various genetic and environmental factors. Identifying biomarkers that can predict robust response to immunization is an urgent need in clinical cancer vaccine development. Given the involvement of DNA methylation in the development of lymphocytes, tumorigenicity and tumor progression, we aimed to analyze pre-vaccination DNA methylation profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from breast cancer subjects vaccinated with a novel peptide-based vaccine referred to as P10s-PADRE. This pilot study was performed to evaluate whether signatures of differentially methylated (DM) loci can be developed as potential predictive biomarkers for prescreening subjects with cancer who will most likely generate an immune response to the vaccine. Genomic DNA was isolated from PBMCs of eight vaccinated subjects, and their DNA methylation profiles were determined using Infinium® MethylationEPIC BeadChip array from Illumina. A linear regression model was applied to identify loci that were differentially methylated with respect to anti-peptide antibody titers and with IFN-γ production. The data were summarized using unsupervised-learning methods: hierarchical clustering and principal-component analysis. Pathways and networks involved were predicted by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. We observed that the profile of DM loci separated subjects in regards to the levels of immune responses. Canonical pathways and networks related to metabolic and immunological functions were found to be involved. The data suggest that it is feasible to correlate methylation signatures in pre-treatment PBMCs with immune responses post-treatment in cancer patients going through standard-of-care chemotherapy. Larger and prospective studies that focus on DM loci in PBMCs is warranted to develop pre-screening biomarkers before BC vaccination. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02229084.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinthia Violeta Hernandez Puente
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,UnivLyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ping-Ching Hsu
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Lora J Rogers
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Fariba Jousheghany
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Eric Siegel
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Susan A Kadlubar
- Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Division of Medical Genetics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | | | - Issam Makhoul
- Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Laura F Hutchins
- Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Thomas Kieber-Emmons
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.,Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Toth R, Schiffmann H, Hube-Magg C, Büscheck F, Höflmayer D, Weidemann S, Lebok P, Fraune C, Minner S, Schlomm T, Sauter G, Plass C, Assenov Y, Simon R, Meiners J, Gerhäuser C. Random forest-based modelling to detect biomarkers for prostate cancer progression. Clin Epigenetics 2019; 11:148. [PMID: 31640781 PMCID: PMC6805338 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-019-0736-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical course of prostate cancer (PCa) is highly variable, demanding an individualized approach to therapy. Overtreatment of indolent PCa cases, which likely do not progress to aggressive stages, may be associated with severe side effects and considerable costs. These could be avoided by utilizing robust prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions. RESULTS We present a random forest-based classification model to predict aggressive behaviour of prostate cancer. DNA methylation changes between PCa cases with good or poor prognosis (discovery cohort with n = 70) were used as input. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed tumour tissue, and genome-wide DNA methylation differences between both groups were assessed using Illumina HumanMethylation450 arrays. For the random forest-based modelling, the discovery cohort was randomly split into a training (80%) and a test set (20%). Our methylation-based classifier demonstrated excellent performance in discriminating prognosis subgroups in the test set (Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank p value < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the sensitivity analysis was 95%. Using the ICGC cohort of early- and late-onset prostate cancer (n = 222) and the TCGA PRAD cohort (n = 477) for external validation, AUCs for sensitivity analyses were 77.1% and 68.7%, respectively. Cancer progression-related DNA hypomethylation was frequently located in 'partially methylated domains' (PMDs)-large-scale genomic areas with progressive loss of DNA methylation linked to mitotic cell division. We selected several candidate genes with differential methylation in gene promoter regions for additional validation at the protein expression level by immunohistochemistry in > 12,000 tissue micro-arrayed PCa cases. Loss of ZIC2 protein expression was associated with poor prognosis and correlated with significantly shorter time to biochemical recurrence. The prognostic value of ZIC2 proved to be independent from established clinicopathological variables including Gleason grade, tumour stage, nodal stage and prostate-specific-antigen. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the prognostic relevance of methylation loss in PMD regions, as well as of several candidate genes not previously associated with PCa progression. Our robust and externally validated PCa classification model either directly or via protein expression analyses of the identified top-ranked candidate genes will support the clinical management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reka Toth
- Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heiko Schiffmann
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Büscheck
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Doris Höflmayer
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sören Weidemann
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Lebok
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Fraune
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Minner
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Plass
- Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yassen Assenov
- Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Meiners
- General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department and Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clarissa Gerhäuser
- Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patel PG, Wessel T, Kawashima A, Okello JBA, Jamaspishvili T, Guérard KP, Lee L, Lee AYW, How NE, Dion D, Scarlata E, Jackson CL, Boursalie S, Sack T, Dunn R, Moussa M, Mackie/ K, Ellis A, Marra E, Chin J, Siddiqui K, Hetou K, Pickard LA, Arthur-Hayward V, Bauman G, Chevalier S, Brimo F, Boutros PC, Lapointe PhD J, Bartlett JMS, Gooding RJ, Berman DM. A three-gene DNA methylation biomarker accurately classifies early stage prostate cancer. Prostate 2019; 79:1705-1714. [PMID: 31433512 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We identify and validate accurate diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer through a systematic evaluation of DNA methylation alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assembled three early prostate cancer cohorts (total patients = 699) from which we collected and processed over 1300 prostatectomy tissue samples for DNA extraction. Using real-time methylation-specific PCR, we measured normalized methylation levels at 15 frequently methylated loci. After partitioning sample sets into independent training and validation cohorts, classifiers were developed using logistic regression, analyzed, and validated. RESULTS In the training dataset, DNA methylation levels at 7 of 15 genomic loci (glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 [GSTP1], CCDC181, hyaluronan, and proteoglycan link protein 3 [HAPLN3], GSTM2, growth arrest-specific 6 [GAS6], RASSF1, and APC) showed large differences between cancer and benign samples. The best binary classifier was the GAS6/GSTP1/HAPLN3 logistic regression model, with an area under these curves of 0.97, which showed a sensitivity of 94%, and a specificity of 93% after external validation. CONCLUSION We created and validated a multigene model for the classification of benign and malignant prostate tissue. With false positive and negative rates below 7%, this three-gene biomarker represents a promising basis for more accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palak G Patel
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Wessel
- Life Sciences Group, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Atsunari Kawashima
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - John B A Okello
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Cardiac Genome Clinic, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tamara Jamaspishvili
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karl-Philippe Guérard
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Laura Lee
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Ying-Wah Lee
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathan E How
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dan Dion
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eleonora Scarlata
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Chelsea L Jackson
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suzanne Boursalie
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tanya Sack
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Dunn
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madeleine Moussa
- Division of Surgical Pathology, Departmant of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Mackie/
- Division of Surgical Pathology, Departmant of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Audrey Ellis
- Division of Surgical Pathology, Departmant of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Marra
- Division of Surgical Pathology, Departmant of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph Chin
- Department of Surgery (Urology), London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Khurram Siddiqui
- Department of Surgery (Urology), London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Khalil Hetou
- Department of Surgery (Urology), London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Glenn Bauman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simone Chevalier
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fadi Brimo
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Center and McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Departments of Urology and Human Genetics, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacques Lapointe PhD
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Gooding
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physics, Engineering Physics & Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - David M Berman
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cancer Biology & Genetics, Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yegnasubramanian S, De Marzo AM, Nelson WG. Prostate Cancer Epigenetics: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Implications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2019; 9:cshperspect.a030445. [PMID: 29959132 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
A level of epigenetic programming, encoded by complex sets of chemical marks on DNA and histones, and by context-specific DNA, RNA, protein interactions, that all regulate the structure, organization, and function of the genome, is critical to establish both normal and neoplastic cell identities and functions. This structure-function relationship of the genome encoded by the epigenetic programming can be thought of as an epigenetic cityscape that is built on the underlying genetic landscape. Alterations in the epigenetic cityscape of prostate cancer cells compared with normal prostate tissues have a complex interplay with genetic alterations to drive prostate cancer initiation and progression. Indeed, mutations in genes encoding epigenetic enzymes are often observed in human cancers including prostate cancer. Interestingly, alterations in the prostate cancer epigenetic cityscape can be highly recurrent, a facet that can be exploited for development of biomarkers and potentially as therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
| | - Angelo M De Marzo
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
| | - William G Nelson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Reina-Campos M, Linares JF, Duran A, Cordes T, L'Hermitte A, Badur MG, Bhangoo MS, Thorson PK, Richards A, Rooslid T, Garcia-Olmo DC, Nam-Cha SY, Salinas-Sanchez AS, Eng K, Beltran H, Scott DA, Metallo CM, Moscat J, Diaz-Meco MT. Increased Serine and One-Carbon Pathway Metabolism by PKCλ/ι Deficiency Promotes Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer. Cancer Cell 2019; 35:385-400.e9. [PMID: 30827887 PMCID: PMC6424636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly effective therapies targeting the androgen receptor have paradoxically promoted the incidence of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), the most lethal subtype of castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa), for which there is no effective therapy. Here we report that protein kinase C (PKC)λ/ι is downregulated in de novo and during therapy-induced NEPC, which results in the upregulation of serine biosynthesis through an mTORC1/ATF4-driven pathway. This metabolic reprogramming supports cell proliferation and increases intracellular S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) levels to feed epigenetic changes that favor the development of NEPC characteristics. Altogether, we have uncovered a metabolic vulnerability triggered by PKCλ/ι deficiency in NEPC, which offers potentially actionable targets to prevent therapy resistance in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Reina-Campos
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Sanford Burnham Prebys Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Juan F Linares
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Angeles Duran
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Thekla Cordes
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Antoine L'Hermitte
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Mehmet G Badur
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Munveer S Bhangoo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology Scripps Clinic, 10666 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Phataraporn K Thorson
- Depatment of Pathology, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, 10666 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Alicia Richards
- Proteomics Facility, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Tarmo Rooslid
- Conrad Prebys Center for Drug Discovery, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Dolores C Garcia-Olmo
- Centre de Recerca Experimental Biomèdica Aplicada (CREBA), IRBLLEIDA, 25138 Lleida, Spain
| | - Syongh Y Nam-Cha
- Pathology Department, Director of the Research Unit Biobank, University of Castilla-La Mancha, School of Medicine, 02006 Albacete, Spain
| | - Antonio S Salinas-Sanchez
- Urology Department, Research Unit, University Hospital Complex of Albacete, School of Medicine, 02006 Albacete, Spain
| | - Ken Eng
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - David A Scott
- Cancer Metabolism Core, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Christian M Metallo
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Jorge Moscat
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Maria T Diaz-Meco
- Cancer Metabolism and Signaling Networks Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gerhauser C, Favero F, Risch T, Simon R, Feuerbach L, Assenov Y, Heckmann D, Sidiropoulos N, Waszak SM, Hübschmann D, Urbanucci A, Girma EG, Kuryshev V, Klimczak LJ, Saini N, Stütz AM, Weichenhan D, Böttcher LM, Toth R, Hendriksen JD, Koop C, Lutsik P, Matzk S, Warnatz HJ, Amstislavskiy V, Feuerstein C, Raeder B, Bogatyrova O, Schmitz EM, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Huland H, Graefen M, Lawerenz C, Henry GH, Yamaguchi TN, Malewska A, Meiners J, Schilling D, Reisinger E, Eils R, Schlesner M, Strand DW, Bristow RG, Boutros PC, von Kalle C, Gordenin D, Sültmann H, Brors B, Sauter G, Plass C, Yaspo ML, Korbel JO, Schlomm T, Weischenfeldt J. Molecular Evolution of Early-Onset Prostate Cancer Identifies Molecular Risk Markers and Clinical Trajectories. Cancer Cell 2018; 34:996-1011.e8. [PMID: 30537516 PMCID: PMC7444093 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Identifying the earliest somatic changes in prostate cancer can give important insights into tumor evolution and aids in stratifying high- from low-risk disease. We integrated whole genome, transcriptome and methylome analysis of early-onset prostate cancers (diagnosis ≤55 years). Characterization across 292 prostate cancer genomes revealed age-related genomic alterations and a clock-like enzymatic-driven mutational process contributing to the earliest mutations in prostate cancer patients. Our integrative analysis identified four molecular subgroups, including a particularly aggressive subgroup with recurrent duplications associated with increased expression of ESRP1, which we validate in 12,000 tissue microarray tumors. Finally, we combined the patterns of molecular co-occurrence and risk-based subgroup information to deconvolve the molecular and clinical trajectories of prostate cancer from single patient samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Gerhauser
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Francesco Favero
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Risch
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ronald Simon
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Feuerbach
- Division Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yassen Assenov
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Doreen Heckmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nikos Sidiropoulos
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sebastian M Waszak
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Hübschmann
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology and Bioquant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; Department of Pediatric Immunology, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Alfonso Urbanucci
- Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic European Molecular Biology Laboratory Partnership, Forskningsparken, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Core Facilities, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Etsehiwot G Girma
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vladimir Kuryshev
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leszek J Klimczak
- Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Natalie Saini
- Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Adrian M Stütz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Weichenhan
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lisa-Marie Böttcher
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Reka Toth
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Josephine D Hendriksen
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Koop
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pavlo Lutsik
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sören Matzk
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans-Jörg Warnatz
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Clarissa Feuerstein
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Raeder
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olga Bogatyrova
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Hube-Magg
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Kluth
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chris Lawerenz
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gervaise H Henry
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Takafumi N Yamaguchi
- Informatics & Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alicia Malewska
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Jan Meiners
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; NCT Trial Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Reisinger
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Eils
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology and Bioquant, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias Schlesner
- Division of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Bioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics (B240), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Douglas W Strand
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christof von Kalle
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dmitry Gordenin
- Genome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, 27709 NC, USA
| | - Holger Sültmann
- Division of Cancer Genome Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Brors
- Division Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Plass
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie-Laure Yaspo
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Otto Warburg Laboratory Gene Regulation and Systems Biology of Cancer, Ihnestrasse 63-73, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan O Korbel
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Joachim Weischenfeldt
- Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Onco-Multi-OMICS Approach: A New Frontier in Cancer Research. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:9836256. [PMID: 30402498 PMCID: PMC6192166 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9836256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The acquisition of cancer hallmarks requires molecular alterations at multiple levels including genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. In the past decade, numerous attempts have been made to untangle the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis involving single OMICS approaches such as scanning the genome for cancer-specific mutations and identifying altered epigenetic-landscapes within cancer cells or by exploring the differential expression of mRNA and protein through transcriptomics and proteomics techniques, respectively. While these single-level OMICS approaches have contributed towards the identification of cancer-specific mutations, epigenetic alterations, and molecular subtyping of tumors based on gene/protein-expression, they lack the resolving-power to establish the casual relationship between molecular signatures and the phenotypic manifestation of cancer hallmarks. In contrast, the multi-OMICS approaches involving the interrogation of the cancer cells/tissues in multiple dimensions have the potential to uncover the intricate molecular mechanism underlying different phenotypic manifestations of cancer hallmarks such as metastasis and angiogenesis. Moreover, multi-OMICS approaches can be used to dissect the cellular response to chemo- or immunotherapy as well as discover molecular candidates with diagnostic/prognostic value. In this review, we focused on the applications of different multi-OMICS approaches in the field of cancer research and discussed how these approaches are shaping the field of personalized oncomedicine. We have highlighted pioneering studies from “The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)” consortium encompassing integrated OMICS analysis of over 11,000 tumors from 33 most prevalent forms of cancer. Accumulation of huge cancer-specific multi-OMICS data in repositories like TCGA provides a unique opportunity for the systems biology approach to tackle the complexity of cancer cells through the unification of experimental data and computational/mathematical models. In future, systems biology based approach is likely to predict the phenotypic changes of cancer cells upon chemo-/immunotherapy treatment. This review is sought to encourage investigators to bring these different approaches together for interrogating cancer at molecular, cellular, and systems levels.
Collapse
|
27
|
Arechederra M, Daian F, Yim A, Bazai SK, Richelme S, Dono R, Saurin AJ, Habermann BH, Maina F. Hypermethylation of gene body CpG islands predicts high dosage of functional oncogenes in liver cancer. Nat Commun 2018; 9:3164. [PMID: 30089774 PMCID: PMC6082886 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05550-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications such as aberrant DNA methylation reshape the gene expression repertoire in cancer. Here, we used a clinically relevant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mouse model (Alb-R26Met) to explore the impact of DNA methylation on transcriptional switches associated with tumorigenesis. We identified a striking enrichment in genes simultaneously hypermethylated in CpG islands (CGIs) and overexpressed. These hypermethylated CGIs are located either in the 5′-UTR or in the gene body region. Remarkably, such CGI hypermethylation accompanied by gene upregulation also occurs in 56% of HCC patients, which belong to the “HCC proliferative-progenitor” subclass. Most of the genes upregulated and with hypermethylated CGIs in the Alb-R26Met HCC model undergo the same change in a large proportion of HCC patients. Among reprogrammed genes, several are well-known oncogenes. For others not previously linked to cancer, we demonstrate here their action together as an “oncogene module”. Thus, hypermethylation of gene body CGIs is predictive of elevated oncogene levels in cancer, offering a novel stratification strategy and perspectives to normalise cancer gene dosages. Changes in the DNA methylation status are commonly observed in cancer but their impact on cancer development is unclear. Here, combining DNA methylation and expression profiles from a murine model of hepatocellular carcinoma with those from human samples, the authors report an epigenetic reprogramming process ensuring increased dosage of an “oncogene module”.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Arechederra
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Fabrice Daian
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Annie Yim
- Computational Biology Group, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sehrish K Bazai
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Sylvie Richelme
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Rosanna Dono
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Andrew J Saurin
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Bianca H Habermann
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Flavio Maina
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Developmental Biology Institute of Marseille (IBDM), Parc Scientifique de Luminy, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhao S, Leonardson A, Geybels MS, McDaniel AS, Yu M, Kolb S, Zong H, Carter K, Siddiqui J, Cheng A, Wright JL, Pritchard CC, Lance R, Troyer D, Fan J, Ostrander EA, Dai JY, Tomlins SA, Feng Z, Stanford JL. A five-CpG DNA methylation score to predict metastatic-lethal outcomes in men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Prostate 2018; 78:1084-1091. [PMID: 29956356 PMCID: PMC6120526 DOI: 10.1002/pros.23667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic biomarkers for localized prostate cancer (PCa) could improve personalized medicine. Our group previously identified a panel of differentially methylated CpGs in primary tumor tissue that predict disease aggressiveness, and here we further validate these biomarkers. METHODS Pyrosequencing was used to assess CpG methylation of eight biomarkers previously identified using the HumanMethylation450 array; CpGs with strongly correlated (r >0.70) results were considered technically validated. Logistic regression incorporating the validated CpGs and Gleason sum was used to define and lock a final model to stratify men with metastatic-lethal versus non-recurrent PCa in a training dataset. Coefficients from the final model were then used to construct a DNA methylation score, which was evaluated by logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in an independent testing dataset. RESULTS Five CpGs were technically validated and all were retained (P < 0.05) in the final model. The 5-CpG and Gleason sum coefficients were used to calculate a methylation score, which was higher in men with metastatic-lethal progression (P = 6.8 × 10-6 ) in the testing dataset. For each unit increase in the score there was a four-fold increase in risk of metastatic-lethal events (odds ratio, OR = 4.0, 95%CI = 1.8-14.3). At 95% specificity, sensitivity was 74% for the score compared to 53% for Gleason sum alone. The score demonstrated better prediction performance (AUC = 0.91; pAUC = 0.037) compared to Gleason sum alone (AUC = 0.87; pAUC = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS The DNA methylation score improved upon Gleason sum for predicting metastatic-lethal progression and holds promise for risk stratification of men with aggressive tumors. This prognostic score warrants further evaluation as a tool for improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Zhao
- National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesBiostatistics and Computational Biology BranchResearch Triangle ParkDurhamNorth Carolina
| | - Amy Leonardson
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Milan S. Geybels
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
- Department of EpidemiologyGROW School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Andrew S. McDaniel
- Departments of Pathology and UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichigan
| | - Ming Yu
- Division of Clinical ResearchFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Suzanne Kolb
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Hong Zong
- Division of Clinical ResearchFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Kelly Carter
- Division of Clinical ResearchFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Departments of Pathology and UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichigan
| | - Anqi Cheng
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
- Department of UrologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| | - Colin C. Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| | - Raymond Lance
- Department of UrologyEastern Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolkVirginia
| | - Dean Troyer
- Departments of Pathology, Microbiology, and Molecular Cell BiologyEastern Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolkVirginia
| | - Jian‐Bing Fan
- Department of OncologyIllumina, Inc.San DiegoCalifornia
| | - Elaine A. Ostrander
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics BranchNational Human Genome Research InstituteNIHBethesdaMaryland
| | - James Y. Dai
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
| | - Scott A. Tomlins
- Departments of Pathology and UrologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichigan
| | - Ziding Feng
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
- Department of BiostatisticsMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexas
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchison Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashington
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Washington School of Public HealthSeattleWashington
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Parimi S, Ko JJ. Recent advances in circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA in metastatic prostate cancer: a review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:939-949. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1359544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Parimi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, Canada
| | - Jenny J. Ko
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Abbotsford, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Normal cells have a level of epigenetic programming that is superimposed on the genetic code to establish and maintain their cell identity and phenotypes. This epigenetic programming can be thought as the architecture, a sort of cityscape, that is built upon the underlying genetic landscape. The epigenetic programming is encoded by a complex set of chemical marks on DNA, on histone proteins in nucleosomes, and by numerous context-specific DNA, RNA, protein interactions that all regulate the structure, organization, and function of the genome in a given cell. It is becoming increasingly evident that abnormalities in both the genetic landscape and epigenetic cityscape can cooperate to drive carcinogenesis and disease progression. Large-scale cancer genome sequencing studies have revealed that mutations in genes encoding the enzymatic machinery for shaping the epigenetic cityscape are among the most common mutations observed in human cancers, including prostate cancer. Interestingly, although the constellation of genetic mutations in a given cancer can be quite heterogeneous from person to person, there are numerous epigenetic alterations that appear to be highly recurrent, and nearly universal in a given cancer type, including in prostate cancer. The highly recurrent nature of these alterations can be exploited for development of biomarkers for cancer detection and risk stratification and as targets for therapeutic intervention. Here, we explore the basic principles of epigenetic processes in normal cells and prostate cancer cells and discuss the potential clinical implications with regards to prostate cancer biomarker development and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tet3-Mediated DNA Demethylation Contributes to the Direct Conversion of Fibroblast to Functional Neuron. Cell Rep 2016; 17:2326-2339. [DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
32
|
Sweet TJ, Ting AH. WOMEN IN CANCER THEMATIC REVIEW: Diverse functions of DNA methylation: implications for prostate cancer and beyond. Endocr Relat Cancer 2016; 23:T169-T178. [PMID: 27605446 DOI: 10.1530/erc-16-0306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies in men worldwide. Current clinical screening ensures that most prostate cancers are diagnosed while still organ confined, but disease outcome is highly variable. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular features contributing to prostate cancer aggressiveness is being sought. For many cancers, aberrant genome-wide patterns of cytosine DNA methylation in CpG dinucleotides distinguish tumor from normal tissue and contribute to disease progression by altering the transcriptome. In prostate cancer, recent genomic studies identified cancer and high grade-specific differential DNA methylation in gene promoters, gene bodies, gene 3' ends and at distal regulatory elements. Using examples from developmental and disease systems, we will discuss how DNA methylation in each of these genomic contexts can contribute to transcriptome diversity by modulating transcription initiation, alternative transcription start site selection, alternative pre-mRNA splicing and alternative polyadenylation. Alternative transcripts from the same gene often exhibit altered protein-coding potential, translatability, stability and/or localization. All of these can have functional consequences in cells. In future work, it will be important to determine if DNA methylation abnormalities in prostate cancer modify the transcriptome through some or all of these mechanisms and if these DNA methylation-mediated transcriptome alterations impact prostate tumorigenesis and aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Sweet
- Genomic Medicine InstituteLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Angela H Ting
- Genomic Medicine InstituteLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bhasin JM, Hu B, Ting AH. MethylAction: detecting differentially methylated regions that distinguish biological subtypes. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 44:106-16. [PMID: 26673711 PMCID: PMC4705678 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA methylation differences capture substantial information about the molecular and gene-regulatory states among biological subtypes. Enrichment-based next generation sequencing methods such as MBD-isolated genome sequencing (MiGS) and MeDIP-seq are appealing for studying DNA methylation genome-wide in order to distinguish between biological subtypes. However, current analytic tools do not provide optimal features for analyzing three-group or larger study designs. MethylAction addresses this need by detecting all possible patterns of statistically significant hyper- and hypo- methylation in comparisons involving any number of groups. Crucially, significance is established at the level of differentially methylated regions (DMRs), and bootstrapping determines false discovery rates (FDRs) associated with each pattern. We demonstrate this functionality in a four-group comparison among benign prostate and three clinical subtypes of prostate cancer and show that the bootstrap FDRs are highly useful in selecting the most robust patterns of DMRs. Compared to existing tools that are limited to two-group comparisons, MethylAction detects more DMRs with strong differential methylation measurements confirmed by whole genome bisulfite sequencing and offers a better balance between precision and recall in cross-cohort comparisons. MethylAction is available as an R package at http://jeffbhasin.github.io/methylaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey M Bhasin
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Bo Hu
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Angela H Ting
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|