Defining Essential Enhancers for Pluripotent Stem Cells Using a Features-Oriented CRISPR-Cas9 Screen

Super-enhancer omics in stem cell

The hallmarks of stem cells, such as proliferation, self-renewal, development, differentiation, and regeneration, are critical to maintain stem cell identity which is sustained by genetic and epigenetic factors. Super-enhancers (SEs), which consist of clusters of active enhancers, play a central role in maintaining stemness hallmarks by specifically transcriptional model. The SE-navigated transcriptional complex, including SEs, non-coding RNAs, master transcriptional factors, Mediators and other co-activators, forms phase-separated condensates, which offers a toggle for directing diverse stem cell fate. With the burgeoning technologies of multiple-omics applied to examine different aspects of SE, we firstly raise the concept of "super-enhancer omics", inextricably linking to Pan-omics. In the review, we discuss the spatiotemporal organization and concepts of SEs, and describe links between SE-navigated transcriptional complex and stem cell features, such as stem cell identity, self-renewal, pluripotency, differentiation and development. We also elucidate the mechanism of stemness and oncogenic SEs modulating cancer stem cells via genomic and epigenetic alterations hijack in cancer stem cell. Additionally, we discuss the potential of targeting components of the SE complex using small molecule compounds, genome editing, and antisense oligonucleotides to treat SE-associated organ dysfunction and diseases, including cancer. This review also provides insights into the future of stem cell research through the paradigm of SEs.

Ribosomal proteins regulate 2-cell-stage transcriptome in mouse embryonic stem cells

A rare sub-population of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), the 2-cell-like cell, is defined by the expression of MERVL and 2-cell-stage-specific transcript (2C transcript). Here, we report that the ribosomal proteins (RPs) RPL14, RPL18, and RPL23 maintain the identity of mESCs and regulate the expression of 2C transcripts. Disregulation of the RPs induces DUX-dependent expression of 2C transcripts and alters the chromatin landscape. Mechanically, knockdown (KD) of RPs triggers the binding of RPL11 to MDM2, an interaction known to prevent P53 protein degradation. Increased P53 protein upon RP KD further activates its downstream pathways, including DUX. Our study delineates the critical roles of RPs in 2C transcript activation, ascribing a novel function to these essential proteins.

SETDB1 acts as a topological accessory to Cohesin via an H3K9me3-independent, genomic shunt for regulating cell fates

SETDB1 is a key regulator of lineage-specific genes and endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs) through its deposition of repressive H3K9me3 mark. Apart from its H3K9me3 regulatory role, SETDB1 has seldom been studied in terms of its other potential regulatory roles. To investigate this, a genomic survey of SETDB1 binding in mouse embryonic stem cells across multiple libraries was conducted, leading to the unexpected discovery of regions bereft of common repressive histone marks (H3K9me3, H3K27me3). These regions were enriched with the CTCF motif that is often associated with the topological regulator Cohesin. Further profiling of these non-H3K9me3 regions led to the discovery of a cluster of non-repeat loci that were co-bound by SETDB1 and Cohesin. These regions, which we named DiSCs (domains involving SETDB1 and Cohesin) were seen to be proximal to the gene promoters involved in embryonic stem cell pluripotency and lineage development. Importantly, it was found that SETDB1-Cohesin co-regulate target gene expression and genome topology at these DiSCs. Depletion of SETDB1 led to localized dysregulation of Cohesin binding thereby locally disrupting topological structures. Dysregulated gene expression trends revealed the importance of this cluster in ES cell maintenance as well as at gene 'islands' that drive differentiation to other lineages. The 'unearthing' of the DiSCs thus unravels a unique topological and transcriptional axis of control regulated chiefly by SETDB1.

Inducible CRISPRa screen identifies putative enhancers

Enhancers are critical cis-regulatory elements that regulate spatiotemporal gene expression and control cell fates. However, the identification of enhancers in native cellular contexts still remains a challenge. Here, we develop an inducible CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) system by transgenic expression of doxycycline (Dox)-inducible dCas9-VPR in mouse embryonic stem cells (iVPR ESC). With this line, a simple introduction of specific guide RNAs targeting promoters or enhancers allows us to realize the effect of CRISPRa in an inducible, reversible, and Dox concentration-dependent manner. Taking advantage of this system, we induce tiled CRISPRa across genomic regions (105 kilobases) surrounding T (Brachyury), one of the key mesodermal development regulator genes. Moreover, we identify several CRISPRa-responsive elements with chromatin features of putative enhancers, including a region the homologous sequence in which humans harbors a body height risk variant. Genetic deletion of this region in ESC does affect subsequent T gene activation and osteogenic differentiation. Therefore, our inducible CRISPRa ESC line provides a convenient platform for high-throughput screens of putative enhancers.

Coupled Source-Sink Habitats Produce Spatial and Temporal Variation of Cancer Cell Molecular Properties as an Alternative to Branched Clonal Evolution and Stem Cell Paradigms

Intratumoral molecular cancer cell heterogeneity is conventionally ascribed to the accumulation of random mutations that occasionally generate fitter phenotypes. This model is built upon the “mutation-selection” paradigm in which mutations drive ever-fitter cancer cells independent of environmental circumstances. An alternative model posits spatio-temporal variation (e.g., blood flow heterogeneity) drives speciation by selecting for cancer cells adapted to each different environment. Here, spatial genetic variation is the consequence rather than the cause of intratumoral evolution. In nature, spatially heterogenous environments are frequently coupled through migration. Drawing from ecological models, we investigate adjacent well-perfused and poorly-perfused tumor regions as “source” and “sink” habitats, respectively. The source habitat has a high carrying capacity resulting in more emigration than immigration. Sink habitats may support a small (“soft-sink”) or no (“hard-sink”) local population. Ecologically, sink habitats can reduce the population size of the source habitat so that, for example, the density of cancer cells directly around blood vessels may be lower than expected. Evolutionarily, sink habitats can exert a selective pressure favoring traits different from those in the source habitat so that, for example, cancer cells adjacent to blood vessels may be suboptimally adapted for that habitat. Soft sinks favor a generalist cancer cell type that moves between the environment but can, under some circumstances, produce speciation events forming source and sink habitat specialists resulting in significant molecular variation in cancer cells separated by small distances. Finally, sink habitats, with limited blood supply, may receive reduced concentrations of systemic drug treatments; and local hypoxia and acidosis may further decrease drug efficacy allowing cells to survive treatment and evolve resistance. In such cases, the sink transforms into the source habitat for resistant cancer cells, leading to treatment failure and tumor progression. We note these dynamics will result in spatial variations in molecular properties as an alternative to the conventional branched evolution model and will result in cellular migration as well as variation in cancer cell phenotype and proliferation currently described by the stem cell paradigm.