Lysine long-chain fatty acylation regulates the TEAD transcription factor

Discovery of potent substrate-type lysine methyltransferase G9a inhibitors for the treatment of sickle cell disease

Structurally novel inhibitors of the lysine methyltransferase G9a have attracted considerable interest as potential drug candidates for cancer and genetic diseases. Here, a detailed account of potency optimization from early leads 8 and 9 to compound 16g is presented. Our search for an alternative scaffold for the 4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indole moiety of compounds 8 and 9 via parallel synthesis led to the identification of the 4-pyridin-4-ylamino phenyl substructure in compound 16g. This substructure was found to bind to the enzyme in a horizontally flipped manner compared with compound 8 in X-ray crystallographic analysis. Compound 16g is a highly potent G9a inhibitor (IC50 = 0.0020 μM) and structurally distinct from other G9a inhibitors reported in the literature. Importantly, compound 16g exhibited dose-dependent induction of γ-globin mRNA in HUDEP-2, leading to elevated γ-globin protein levels and F cell numbers in CD34+ bone marrow (BM)‒derived hematopoietic cells. Kinetic studies using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis suggested that compound 16g interacts with G9a via a unique binding mode, as indicated by the markedly higher dissociation constant (KD) compared to those of compounds 8 and 9. Interestingly, X-ray crystallographic studies revealed that the binding motif of compound 16g was quite different from our previous series, including RK-701, and somewhat resembles that of endogenous substrates. Insights obtained in this lead optimization exercise on the association/dissociation constants as well as the binding motifs are expected to help in designing future G9a inhibitors for the treatment of sickle cell disease.

Recapitulating the potential contribution of protein S-palmitoylation in cancer

Protein S-palmitoylation is a reversible form of protein lipidation in which the formation of a thioester bond occurs between a cysteine (Cys) residue of a protein and a 16-carbon fatty acid chain. This modification is catalyzed by a family of palmitoyl acyl transferases, the DHHC enzymes, so called because of their Asp-His-His-Cys (DHHC) catalytic motif. Deregulation of DHHC enzymes has been linked to various diseases, including cancer and infections. Cancer, a major cause of global mortality, is characterized by features like uncontrolled cell growth, resistance to cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Several of these processes are controlled by DHHC-mediated S-palmitoylation of oncogenes or tumor suppressors, including growth factor receptors (e.g., EGFR), kinases (e.g., AKT), and transcription factors (e.g., β-catenin). Dynamic regulation of S-palmitoylation is also governed by protein depalmitoylases. These enzymes balance the cycling of palmitoylation and regulate cellular signaling, cell growth, and its organization. Given the significance of S-palmitoylation in cancer, the DHHCs and protein depalmitoylases are promising targets for cancer therapy. Here we summarize the catalytic mechanisms of DHHC enzymes and depalmitoylases, their role in cancer progression and prevention, as well as the crosstalk of palmitoylation with other post-translational modifications. Additionally, we discuss the methods to detect S-palmitoylation, the limitations of available DHHC-targeting inhibitors, and ongoing research efforts to address these obstacles.

Allosteric Modulation of the YAP/TAZ-TEAD Interaction by Palmitoylation and Small-Molecule Inhibitors

The Hippo signaling pathway is a highly conserved signaling network that plays a central role in regulating cellular growth, proliferation, and organ size. This pathway consists of a kinase cascade that integrates various upstream signals to control the activation or inactivation of YAP/TAZ proteins. Phosphorylated YAP/TAZ is sequestered in the cytoplasm; however, when the Hippo pathway is deactivated, it translocates into the nucleus, where it associates with TEAD transcription factors. This partnership is instrumental in regulating the transcription of progrowth and antiapoptotic genes. Thus, in many cancers, aberrantly hyperactivated YAP/TAZ promotes oncogenesis by contributing to cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Because YAP and TAZ exert their oncogenic effects by binding with TEAD, it is critical to understand this key interaction to develop cancer therapeutics. Previous research has indicated that TEAD undergoes autopalmitoylation at a conserved cysteine, and small molecules that inhibit TEAD palmitoylation disrupt effective YAP/TAZ binding. However, how exactly palmitoylation contributes to YAP/TAZ-TEAD interactions and how the TEAD palmitoylation inhibitors disrupt this interaction remains unknown. Utilizing molecular dynamics simulations, our investigation not only provides detailed atomistic insight into the YAP/TAZ-TEAD dynamics but also unveils that the inhibitor studied influences the binding of YAP and TAZ to TEAD in distinct manners. This discovery has significant implications for the design and deployment of future molecular interventions targeting this interaction.

SIRT7: a novel molecular target for personalized cancer treatment?

The Sirtuin family of NAD+-dependent enzymes assumes a pivotal role in orchestrating adaptive responses to environmental fluctuations and stress stimuli, operating at both genomic and metabolic levels. Within this family, SIRT7 emerges as a versatile player in tumorigenesis, displaying both pro-tumorigenic and tumor-suppressive functions in a context-dependent manner. While other sirtuins, such as SIRT1 and SIRT6, exhibit a similar dual role in cancer, SIRT7 stands out due to distinctive attributes that sharply distinguish it from other family members. Among these are a unique key role in regulation of nucleolar functions, a close functional relationship with RNA metabolism and processing -exceptional among sirtuins- and a complex multienzymatic nature, which provides a diverse range of molecular targets. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the role of SIRT7 in various malignancies, placing particular emphasis on the intricate molecular mechanisms employed by SIRT7 to either stimulate or counteract tumorigenesis. Additionally, it delves into the unique features of SIRT7, discussing their potential and specific implications in tumor initiation and progression, underscoring the promising avenue of targeting SIRT7 for the development of innovative anti-cancer therapies.

Comparative Assessment and High-Throughput Drug-Combination Profiling of TEAD-Palmitoylation Inhibitors in Hippo Pathway Deficient Mesothelioma

The hippo signaling pathway is a central tumor suppressor cascade frequently inactivated in selected human cancers, leading to the aberrant activation of TEAD transcription factors. Whereas several TEAD auto-palmitoylation inhibitors are currently in development, a comprehensive assessment of this novel drug-modality is missing. Here, we report a comparative analysis among six TEADi(s) using cell-based and biochemical assays in Hippo pathway deficient mesothelioma. Our analysis revealed varying potency and selectivity across TEADi, also highlighting their limited efficacy. To overcome this limitation, we performed an unbiased, quantitative high-throughput drug screening by combining the TEADi VT-103 with a library of approximately 3000 oncology-focused drugs. By exploiting this library's mechanistic redundancy, we identified several drug-classes robustly synergized with TEADi. These included glucocorticoid-receptor (GR) agonists, Mek1/2 inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and PI3K inhibitors, among others. Altogether, we report a coherent single-agent dataset informing on potency and selectivity of TEAD-palmitoylation inhibitors as single-agents. We also describe a rational pipeline enabling the systematic identification of TEAD druggable co-dependencies. This data should support the pre-clinical development of drug combination strategies for the treatment of Hippo-deficient mesothelioma, and more broadly, for other cancers dependent on the oncogenic activity of YAP/TEAD.