MEF2A suppresses stress responses that trigger DDX41-dependent IFN production

The immune system in cardiovascular diseases: from basic mechanisms to therapeutic implications

Immune system plays a crucial role in the physiological and pathological regulation of the cardiovascular system. The exploration history and milestones of immune system in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have evolved from the initial discovery of chronic inflammation in atherosclerosis to large-scale clinical studies confirming the importance of anti-inflammatory therapy in treating CVDs. This progress has been facilitated by advancements in various technological approaches, including multi-omics analysis (single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptome et al.) and significant improvements in immunotherapy techniques such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. Both innate and adaptive immunity holds a pivotal role in CVDs, involving Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing proteins 1 and 2 (NOD1/2) signaling pathway, inflammasome signaling pathway, RNA and DNA sensing signaling pathway, as well as antibody-mediated and complement-dependent systems. Meanwhile, immune responses are simultaneously regulated by multi-level regulations in CVDs, including epigenetics (DNA, RNA, protein) and other key signaling pathways in CVDs, interactions among immune cells, and interactions between immune and cardiac or vascular cells. Remarkably, based on the progress in basic research on immune responses in the cardiovascular system, significant advancements have also been made in pre-clinical and clinical studies of immunotherapy. This review provides an overview of the role of immune system in the cardiovascular system, providing in-depth insights into the physiological and pathological regulation of immune responses in various CVDs, highlighting the impact of multi-level regulation of immune responses in CVDs. Finally, we also discuss pre-clinical and clinical strategies targeting the immune system and translational implications in CVDs.

Gain-of-function enhancer variant near KCNB1 causes familial ST-depression syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial ST-depression syndrome (FSTD) is a recently identified inherited cardiac disease associated with arrhythmias and systolic dysfunction. The underlying genetic aetiology has remained elusive. This study aimed at finding the causative variant.

METHODS

A total of 67 FSTD patients (20 families) were studied. Linkage analysis and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were initially performed. An identified non-coding variant was functionally characterized in AC16 human cardiomyocytes, muscle tissue, and human myocardium. In silico analyses, luciferase and dCas9-activator/repressor assays, protein-DNA experiments, chromosome conformation capture (4C), and RNA sequencing were also performed.

RESULTS

The electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype was inherited in an autosomal dominant manner in all families. Linkage analysis revealed a single peak on chromosome 20, and WGS identified a single, rare, non-coding variant located 18 kb downstream of KCNB1 on chromosome 20 in all affected individuals. Perfect co-segregation with the ECG phenotype was observed together with full penetrance in all families. The variant creates a MEF2-binding site and presence of the variant allele or MEF2 co-expression enhanced transcriptional activity. dCas9-activator/repressor assays showed that KCNB1 was the only gene consistently regulated by the locus and 4C experiments in AC16 cells and human muscle tissue confirmed the locus-KCNB1 promoter interaction. Expression analysis in human endocardial tissue did not document any change in gene expression likely explained by expressional heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

A gain-of-function enhancer variant creates a hyperactive regulatory locus that interacts with the KCNB1 promoter and causes FSTD. This is the first time that KCNB1 has been implicated in human cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis.

Advancements and challenges of R-loops in cancers: Biological insights and future directions

R-loops involve in various biological processes under human normal physiological conditions. Disruption of R-loops can lead to disease onset and affect the progression of illnesses, particularly in cancers. Herein, we summarized and discussed the regulative networks, phenotypes and future directions of R-loops in cancers. In this review, we highlighted the following insights: (1) R-loops significantly influence cancer development, progression and treatment efficiency by regulating key genes, such as PARPs, BRCA1/2, sex hormone receptors, DHX9, and TOP1. (2) Currently, the ATM, ATR, cGAS/STING, and noncanonical pathways are the main pathways that involve in the regulatory network of R-loops in cancer. (3) Cancer biology can be modulated by R-loops-regulated phenotypes, including RNA methylation, DNA and histone methylation, oxidative stress, immune and inflammation regulation, and senescence. (4) Regulation of R-loops induces kinds of drug resistance in various cancers, suggesting that targeting R-loops maybe a promising way to overcome treatment resistance. (5) The role of R-loops in tumorigenesis remains controversial, and senescence may be a crucial research direction to unravel the mechanism of R-loop-induced tumorigenesis. Looking forward, further studies are needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms of R-loops in cancer, laying the groundwork for preclinical and clinical research.

Established and Emerging Roles of DEAD/H-Box Helicases in Regulating Infection and Immunity

The sensing of nucleic acids by DEAD/H-box helicases, specifically retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), plays a critical role in inducing antiviral immunity following infection. However, this DEAD/H-box helicase family includes many additional proteins whose immune functions have not been investigated. While numerous DEAD/H-box helicases contribute to antiviral immunity, they employ diverse mechanisms beyond the direct sensing of nucleic acids. Some members have also been identified to play proviral (promoting virus replication/propagation) roles during infections, regulate other non-viral infections, and contribute to the regulation of autoimmunity and cancer. This review synthesizes the known and emerging functions of the broader DEAD/H-box helicase family in immune regulation and highlights ongoing efforts to target these proteins therapeutically.

DNA sensors in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects

DNA sensors generally initiate innate immune responses through the production of type I interferons. While extensively studied for host defense against invading pathogens, emerging evidence highlights the involvement of DNA sensors in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Elevated levels of modified, damaged, or ectopically localized self-DNA and non-self-DNA have been observed in patients and animal models with obesity, diabetes, fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular disease. The accumulation of cytosolic DNA aberrantly activates DNA signaling pathways, driving the pathological progression of these disorders. This review highlights the roles of specific DNA sensors, such as cyclic AMP-GMP synthase and stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING), absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16), DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), and DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41) in various metabolic disorders. We explore how DNA signaling pathways in both immune and non-immune cells contribute to the development of these diseases. Furthermore, we discuss the intricate interplay between metabolic stress and immune responses, offering insights into potential therapeutic targets for managing metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. Understanding the mechanisms of DNA sensor signaling in these contexts provides a foundation for developing novel interventions aimed at mitigating the impact of these pervasive health issues.

Multifunctional role of DEAD-box helicase 41 in innate immunity, hematopoiesis and disease

DEAD-box helicases are multifunctional proteins participating in many aspects of cellular RNA metabolism. DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41) in particular has pivotal roles in innate immune sensing and hematopoietic homeostasis. DDX41 recognizes foreign or self-nucleic acids generated during microbial infection, thereby initiating anti-pathogen responses. DDX41 also binds to RNA (R)-loops, structures consisting of DNA/RNA hybrids and a displaced strand of DNA that occur during transcription, thereby maintaining genome stability by preventing their accumulation. DDX41 deficiency leads to increased R-loop levels, resulting in inflammatory responses that likely influence hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell production and development. Beyond nucleic acid binding, DDX41 associates with proteins involved in RNA splicing as well as cellular proteins involved in innate immunity. DDX41 is also a tumor suppressor in familial and sporadic myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia (MDS/AML). In the present review, we summarize the functions of DDX helicases in critical biological processes, particularly focusing on DDX41's association with cellular molecules and the mechanisms underlying its roles in innate immunity, hematopoiesis and the development of myeloid malignancies.

When DNA-damage responses meet innate and adaptive immunity

When cells proliferate, stress on DNA replication or exposure to endogenous or external insults frequently results in DNA damage. DNA-Damage Response (DDR) networks are complex signaling pathways used by multicellular organisms to prevent DNA damage. Depending on the type of broken DNA, the various pathways, Base-Excision Repair (BER), Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER), Mismatch Repair (MMR), Homologous Recombination (HR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Interstrand Crosslink (ICL) repair, and other direct repair pathways, can be activated separately or in combination to repair DNA damage. To preserve homeostasis, innate and adaptive immune responses are effective defenses against endogenous mutation or invasion by external pathogens. It is interesting to note that new research keeps showing how closely DDR components and the immune system are related. DDR and immunological response are linked by immune effectors such as the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) pathway. These effectors act as sensors of DNA damage-caused immune response. Furthermore, DDR components themselves function in immune responses to trigger the generation of inflammatory cytokines in a cascade or even trigger programmed cell death. Defective DDR components are known to disrupt genomic stability and compromise immunological responses, aggravating immune imbalance and leading to serious diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. This study examines the most recent developments in the interaction between DDR elements and immunological responses. The DDR network's immune modulators' dual roles may offer new perspectives on treating infectious disorders linked to DNA damage, including cancer, and on the development of target immunotherapy.

DNA-PK and ATM drive phosphorylation signatures that antagonistically regulate cytokine responses to herpesvirus infection or DNA damage

The DNA-dependent protein kinase, DNA-PK, is an essential regulator of DNA damage repair. DNA-PK-driven phosphorylation events and the activated DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are also components of antiviral intrinsic and innate immune responses. Yet, it is not clear whether and how the DNA-PK response differs between these two forms of nucleic acid stress-DNA damage and DNA virus infection. Here, we define DNA-PK substrates and the signature cellular phosphoproteome response to DNA damage or infection with the nuclear-replicating DNA herpesvirus, HSV-1. We establish that DNA-PK negatively regulates the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) DDR kinase during viral infection. In turn, ATM blocks the binding of DNA-PK and the nuclear DNA sensor IFI16 to viral DNA, thereby inhibiting cytokine responses. However, following DNA damage, DNA-PK enhances ATM activity, which is required for IFN-β expression. These findings demonstrate that the DDR autoregulates cytokine expression through the opposing modulation of DDR kinases.

Protocol for detection of in vitro R-loop formation using dot blots

Dot-blot analysis is a technique that allows for fast and convenient detection and identification of nucleic acids and proteins. Here, we provide a guide for nucleic acid isolation from eukaryotic cells and sample processing to detect RNA/DNA hybrids. We then provide detailed steps to quantify dot signal intensity. This protocol can be adapted for screening conditions that result in the accumulation of R-loops. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Smith et al.1.

DDX41: exploring the roles of a versatile helicase

DDX41 is a DEAD-box helicase and is conserved across species. Mutations in DDX41 have been associated with myeloid neoplasms, including myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia. Though its pathogenesis is not completely known, DDX41 has been shown to have many cellular roles, including in pre-mRNA splicing, innate immune sensing, ribosome biogenesis, translational regulation, and R-loop metabolism. In this review, we will summarize the latest understandings regarding the various roles of DDX41, as well as highlight challenges associated with drug development to target DDX41. Overall, understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms of DDX41 could help develop novel therapeutic options for DDX41 mutation-related hematologic malignancies.

'From R-lupus to cancer': Reviewing the role of R-loops in innate immune responses

Cells possess an inherent and evolutionarily conserved ability to detect and respond to the presence of foreign and pathological 'self' nucleic acids. The result is the stimulation of innate immune responses, signalling to the host immune system that defence mechanisms are necessary to protect the organism. To date, there is a vast body of literature describing innate immune responses to various nucleic acid species, including dsDNA, ssDNA and ssRNA etc., however, there is limited information available on responses to R-loops. R-loops are 3-stranded nucleic acid structures that form during transcription, upon DNA damage and in various other settings. Emerging evidence suggests that innate immune responses may also exist for the detection of R-loop related nucleic acid structures, implicating R-loops as drivers of inflammatory states. In this review, we aim to summarise the evidence indicating that R-loops are immunogenic species that can trigger innate immune responses in physiological and pathological settings and discuss the implications of this in the study of various diseases and therapeutic development.