Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis

Effectiveness and safety of antithrombin for treatment of portal vein thrombosis: Nationwide prospective surveillance of 4 years of clinical experience in Japan

AIM

Antithrombin (AT), a plasma protein with anticoagulant properties, has a long-standing medical history, primarily for treatment of congenital AT deficiency. Accumulated clinical experiences suggest AT is a potential anticoagulant for thrombotic diseases. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness, safety, and clinical significance of AT in portal vein thrombosis (PVT) treatment in clinical practice in Japan, particularly in liver cirrhosis, where bleeding tendencies are increased.

METHODS

This prospective, observational post-marketing surveillance study assessed effectiveness and safety of AT in patients with PVT. Data were collected through electronic case report forms at medical institutions across Japan (from February 2018 to January 2021).

RESULTS

Of 680 patients, cirrhosis was the most prevalent underlying disease (79.7%), and the use of concomitant anticoagulants was common (62.8%). In the effectiveness analysis set (N = 477), overall improvement rate after AT administration was 51.2%, reaching 54.1% in patients with class C (severe) cirrhosis. Factors influencing clinical response included AT activity, Child-Pugh score, number of treatment courses, cause of thrombus, and thrombus obstruction. Responders showed a lower cumulative mortality rate versus nonresponders (18.3% vs. 27.6%; p = 0.013); 1-year recurrence rate among responders was 19.3%. In the safety analysis set (N = 680), bleeding events occurred in 5.15% of patients, with 1.32% having major bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

AT showed promise as an anticoagulant for high-risk PVT cases, especially in liver cirrhosis. Further well-designed comparative studies are needed to verify its efficacy in terms of true endpoints, such as long-term prognosis or improvement in cirrhosis.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis: management for the thrombosis specialist

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) is an uncommon site of venous thrombosis that is associated with complications including portal hypertension and hepatic dysfunction. The evaluation and management of this patient population has evolved in recent years, but there are limited data from clinical trials to guide management. Given the various acquired and biologic risk factors leading to the development of SpVT and the potential complications that can arise from it, input from a multidisciplinary team can be valuable in managing such patients, including thrombosis specialists or hematologists, gastroenterologists or hepatologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. In this article, we present 4 cases that highlight important issues and considerations in the evaluation of SpVT, including initial diagnostic approach in a patient with a new diagnosis of SpVT, considerations for anticoagulant therapy, management of SpVT in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, and the role of interventional vascular procedures in the management of SpVT. By reviewing the current literature, we address clinically relevant questions that are posed to clinicians managing patients with SpVT; we also point out gaps in our current knowledge that merit future investigation.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Portal vein thromboses (PVTs) are common in patients with cirrhosis and are associated with advanced portal hypertension and mortality. The treatment of PVTs remains a clinical challenge due to limited evidence and competing risks of PVT-associated complications vs bleeding risk of anticoagulation. Significant heterogeneity in PVT phenotype based on anatomic, host, and disease characteristics, and an emerging spectrum of therapeutic options further complicate PVT management. This Clinical Practice Update (CPU) aims to provide best practice advice for the evaluation and management of PVT in cirrhosis, including the role of direct oral anticoagulants and endovascular interventions.

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Asymptomatic patients with compensated cirrhosis do not require routine screening for PVT. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Patients with cirrhosis with PVTs identified on Doppler ultrasound should undergo cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to confirm the diagnosis, evaluate for malignancy, and document the degree of lumen occlusion, clot extent, and chronicity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT do not require a hypercoagulable workup in the absence of additional thromboemboli or laboratory abnormalities or family history suggestive of thrombophilia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT with evidence of intestinal ischemia require urgent anticoagulation to minimize ischemic injury. If available, these patients should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology and hepatology, interventional radiology, hematology, and surgery. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Consider observation, with repeat imaging every 3 months until clot regression, in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia and recent (<6 months) thrombosis involving the intrahepatic portal vein branches or when there is <50% occlusion of the main portal vein, splenic vein, or mesenteric veins. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Anticoagulation should be considered in patients with cirrhosis without intestinal ischemia who develop recent (<6 months) PVT that is >50% occlusive or involves the main portal vein or mesenteric vessels. Patients who have increased benefit of recanalization include those with involvement of more than 1 vascular bed, those with thrombus progression, potential liver transplantation candidates, and those with inherited thrombophilia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Anticoagulation is not advised for patients with cirrhosis with chronic (>6 months) PVT with complete occlusion with collateralization (cavernous transformation). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with cirrhosis and PVT warrant endoscopic variceal screening if they are not already on nonselective beta-blocker therapy for bleeding prophylaxis. Avoid delays in the initiation of anticoagulation for PVT, as this decreases the odds of portal vein recanalization. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants are all reasonable anticoagulant options for patients with cirrhosis and PVT. Decision making should be individualized and informed by patient preference and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class. Direct oral anticoagulants may be considered in patients with compensated Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B cirrhosis and offer convenience as their dosages are independent of international normalized ratio monitoring. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Patients with cirrhosis on anticoagulation for PVT should have cross-sectional imaging every 3 months to assess response to treatment. If clot regresses, anticoagulation should be continued until transplantation or at least clot resolution in nontransplantation patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may be considered for selected patients with cirrhosis and PVT who have additional indications for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, such as those with refractory ascites or variceal bleeding. Portal vein revascularization with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting may also be considered for transplantation candidates if recanalization can facilitate the technical feasibility of transplantation.

Prediction and prevention of post-procedural bleedings in patients with cirrhosis

Although post-procedural bleedings are infrequent in patients with cirrhosis, they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, predicting and preventing such bleedings is important. Established predictors of post-procedural bleeding include high-bleeding risk procedure, severe cirrhosis and high body mass index; prognostic value of anemia, acute kidney injury and bacterial infection is more uncertain. While prothrombin time and international normalized ratio do not predict post-procedural bleeding, some evidence suggests that platelet count, whole blood thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic tests may be helpful in this context. Prevention of postprocedural bleeding involves careful management of antithrombotic drugs during the periprocedural period. Patients with cirrhosis present unique challenges due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antithrombotic drugs, but there is a lack of dedicated studies specifically focused on this patient population. Guidelines for periprocedural management of antithrombotic drugs developed for patients without liver disease are thus applied to those with cirrhosis. Some technical aspects may decrease the risk of post-procedural bleeding, namely ultrasoundguidance, opting for transjugular route rather than percutaneous route, and the level of expertise of the operator. The effectiveness of platelet transfusions or thrombopoietin-receptor agonists remains uncertain. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma, of fibrinogen, and administration of tranexamic acid are not recommended for reducing post-procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, prediction of post-procedural requires a global approach taking into account the patients characteristics, the risk of the procedure, and the platelet count. There is little data to support prophylactic correction of hemostasis, and dedicated studies are needed.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of anticoagulation in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in this patient population.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to August 2024. The primary outcomes analyzed were PVT recanalization, progression of PVT, bleeding events, and mortality. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous variables.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, were included in the analysis. Compared to no intervention, anticoagulation significantly increased the PVT recanalization rate (OR = 3.89, p < .001) and decreased the PVT progression rate (OR = 0.28, p < .001) as well as overall mortality (OR = 0.66, p = .008). Importantly, anticoagulation did not significantly increase the bleeding rate (OR = 1.21, p = .41). Subgroup analysis revealed a greater benefit in PVT recanalization within the short-term treatment subgroup (≤ 6 months) compared to long-term treatment subgroup (> 6 months), and in the Asian subgroup compared to the European or United States of America (USA) subgroup. In the Warfarin subgroup, while the total bleeding rate increased significantly, there was no significant rise in major bleeding events. Additionally, a downward trend in variceal bleeding was observed in the Asian subgroup (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.19-1.04; p = .06).

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation is both safe and effective for asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with PVT. It not only treats PVT and reduces all-cause mortality, but also does so without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding events.

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder with portal hypertension: Natural history and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current knowledge of the natural history of patients with porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is derived from small studies. The aim of the present study was to determine the natural history of PSVD and prognostic factors in a large multicenter cohort of patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on patients with PSVD and signs of portal hypertension (PH) prospectively registered in 27 centers.

RESULTS

A total of 587 patients were included, median age of 47 years and 38% were women. Four-hundred and one patients had an associated condition, which was graded as severe in 157. Median follow-up was 68 months. At diagnosis, 64% of patients were asymptomatic while 36% had a PH-related complication: PH-related bleeding in 112 patients, ascites in 117, and hepatic encephalopathy in 11. In those not presenting with bleeding, the incidence of first bleeding was 15% at 5 years, with a 5-year rebleeding rate of 18%. The 5-year cumulative incidence of new or worsening ascites was 18% and of developing portal vein thrombosis was 16%. Fifty (8.5%) patients received a liver transplantation and 109 (19%) died, including 55 non-liver-related deaths. Transplant-free survival was 97% and 83% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Variables independently associated with transplant-free survival were age, ascites, serum bilirubin, albumin and creatinine levels at diagnosis and severe associated conditions. This allowed for the creation of a nomogram that accurately predicted prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of PSVD is strongly determined by the severity of the associated underlying conditions and parameters of liver and renal function.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder (PSVD) is a rare entity that usually affects young people, frequently causes severe complications of portal hypertension, and may reduce life expectancy. To date, there is scarce information regarding its clinical manifestations, natural history and prognostic factors. The present study, including the largest number of patients with PSVD reported so far, shows that overall, when managed at centers of expertise, the prognosis of patients with PSVD is good, with LT-free survival rates of 83% and 72% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Presence and severity of an underlying associated condition, presence of ascites, age and bilirubin, albumin and creatinine levels were associated with poor prognosis. These results are important to know for hepatologists. A final model combining these parameters enabled development of a nomogram that predicts prognosis with good discrimination and calibration capacity and can be easily applied in clinical practice.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of CSPH and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of clinically significant portal hypertension and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Management of Portal vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the common complications of cirrhosis. The incidence of PVT correlates with liver disease severity-higher incidence in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) C, large spontaneous portosystemic shunts, hepatofugal portal flow, and in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma. PVT may worsen ascites, increase the risk and poor control of variceal bleeding. The occurrence of PVT may increase morbidity and lower survival after a liver transplant. Using statins prevents the occurrence of PVT, whereas beta-blockers may aggravate its occurrence. Cross-sectional imaging is mandatory for the precise diagnosis and classification of PVT. Symptomatic, occlusive PVT and candidacy for liver transplantation are the main indications for anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin, and newer anticoagulants are effective and safe in cirrhosis. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants are agents of choice in early cirrhosis (CTP A, B). The duration of anticoagulant therapy, predictors of response, and management of complications of cirrhosis while on therapy require in-depth knowledge and individualized treatment. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt can be considered in nonresponsive cases or when anticoagulants are contraindicated. This manuscript reviews the latest updated knowledge about managing PVT in cirrhosis.

Hematological abnormalities in liver cirrhosis

Hematological abnormalities are common in cirrhosis and are associated with various pathophysiological mechanisms. Studies have documented a prevalence of thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia in patients with compensated cirrhosis of 77.9%, 23.5%, and 21.1%, respectively. These abnormalities carry significant clinical implications, including considerations for invasive procedures, infection risk, bleeding risk, and prognosis. Previously, cirrhosis was believed to predispose patients to bleeding due to alterations observed in classical coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, and thrombocytopenia. However, this understanding has evolved, and cirrhosis patients are now also acknowledged as being at a high risk for thrombotic events. Hemostasis in cirrhosis patients presents a complex phenotype, with procoagulant and anticoagulant abnormalities offsetting each other. This multifactorial phenomenon is inadequately reflected by routine laboratory tests. Thrombotic complications are more prevalent in decompensated cirrhosis and may correlate with disease severity. Bleeding is primarily associated with portal hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, mechanical vessel injury, disseminated intravascular coagulation, endotoxemia, and renal injury. This review comprehensively outlines hematologic index abnormalities, mechanisms of hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis abnormalities, limitations of laboratory testing, and clinical manifestations of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Portal vein thrombosis: diagnosis, management, and endpoints for future clinical studies

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) refers to the development of a non-malignant obstruction of the portal vein, its branches, its radicles, or a combination. This Review first provides a comprehensive overview of all aspects of PVT, namely the specifics of the portal venous system, the risk factors for PVT, the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in PVT, the interest in non-invasive tests, as well as therapeutic approaches including the effect of treating risk factors for PVT or cause of cirrhosis, anticoagulation, portal vein recanalisation by interventional radiology, and prevention and management of variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. Specific issues are also addressed including portal cholangiopathy, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal necrosis, quality of life, fertility, contraception and pregnancy, and PVT in children. This Review will then present endpoints for future clinical studies in PVT, both in patients with and without cirrhosis, agreed by a large panel of experts through a Delphi consensus process. These endpoints include classification of portal vein thrombus extension, classification of PVT evolution, timing of assessment of PVT, and global endpoints for studies on PVT including clinical outcomes. These endpoints will help homogenise studies on PVT and thus facilitate reporting, comparison between studies, and validation of future studies and trials on PVT.

A pilot study of safety and efficacy comparison of low molecular heparin calcium sequential oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (P < 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (P = 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.317).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis.

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: The State-of-the-Art on Anticoagulant Treatment

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a rare type of venous thromboembolism occurring within the splanchnic venous system. Portal vein thrombosis is the most common presentation, while Budd-Chiari syndrome is the least common. Liver cirrhosis and abdominal solid cancer are the main local risk factors for SVT, whereas myeloproliferative neoplasms are the predominant systemic risk factors. Signs and symptoms of SVT are nonspecific and include abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. Asymptomatic SVT is not uncommon, and the majority would be detected incidentally on routine abdominal imaging performed for the follow-up of liver diseases and tumors. The management of SVT aims to prevent thrombus progression, promote vessel recanalization, and prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulation should be started early in order to increase the chances of vessel recanalization and reduce the risk of portal hypertension-related complications. Direct oral anticoagulants have been included in recent guidelines, as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists, after clinical stability has been reached; however, caution is required in patients with liver or kidney dysfunction. Treatment duration is based on the presence (or absence) and type (transient vs. permanent) of risk factors. This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence on SVT, with a particular focus on the anticoagulant treatment in special categories of patients (e.g., liver cirrhosis, solid cancer, myeloproliferative neoplasms, pancreatitis, incidentally detected SVT, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and chronic SVT).

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 2: Treatment, Primary and Secondary Prevention

In most cases, portal vein thrombosis progresses without treatment; spontaneous recanalization of portal vein develops in 42 % of patients with liver cirrhosis. Effective treatment strategies include administration of anticoagulants, interventional procedures such as transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt or endovascular fibrinolysis. Anticoagulant therapy has certain difficulties in patients with liver cirrhosis due to the complex profile of hemostasis, a tendency to both hemorrhages and hypercoagulation. In addition to traditional anticoagulants (heparin preparations, fondaparinux, vitamin K antagonists), direct oral anticoagulants have been widely used in recent years for portal vein thrombosis. Previously, portal vein thrombosis was considered a contraindication to performing transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt, currently the method is often used to restore portal blood flow through the shunt and prevent repeated thrombosis. Endovascular fibrinolysis is still an option for specialized centers for «difficult» patients. In cases of increased risk of venous thromboembolism, patients with liver cirrhosis are recommended to be prevented with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, but further studies should clarify their effectiveness in this aspect. The review highlights data on the features of therapy, primary and secondary prevention of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Despite the existing clinical recommendations for management of patients with cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, the choice of a particular strategy primarily depends on an individualized assessment of risks and benefits of each treatment method.

Classification and Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: A Narrative Review

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) poses significant therapeutic challenges due to its complex pathophysiology and diverse clinical presentations. Recent advancements have spurred the development of new therapeutic approaches to enhance treatment efficacy and safety. This review synthesized emerging therapies for PVT based on a comprehensive literature search across major databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, among others, focusing on studies published in the last decade. Anticoagulation therapy, particularly with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), emerged as beneficial in personalized treatment regimens. Innovative surgical techniques and improved risk stratification methods were identified as crucial in the perioperative management of PVT. Additionally, advances in cell therapy and medical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of PVT were explored. Promising outcomes were observed with modalities such as Yttrium 90 and liver transplantation combined with thrombectomy, particularly in complex PVT cases associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, albeit on a limited scale. The reviewed literature indicates a shift towards individualized treatment approaches for PVT, integrating novel anticoagulants, refined risk assessment tools, and tailored interventional strategies. While these emerging therapies show potential for enhanced efficacy and safety, further research is essential to validate findings across broader patient populations and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinic, Diag-nosis, Impact on Prognosis

   Portal vein thrombosis is the most common thrombotic complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in cases of severe forms. The pathogenesis is multifactorial in nature, it determined by a change in the balance between the coagulation and anticoagulation systems. Thrombosis is often asymptomatic and is accidentally detected, although it can be complicated by varicose bleeding, intestinal ischemia, and portal biliopathy. Ultrasound Doppler examination is a screening method, as an alternative, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are used. The review highlights data on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. The data on the effect of portal vein thrombosis on the progression of liver cirrhosis and the survival of patients, including after liver transplantation, are presented.

Statin use in cirrhosis and its association with incidence of portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Statin use has shown a reduction in hepatic decompensation and portal hypertension. Its association with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) incidence is unknown. We aim to compare the incidence of PVT in patients with and without statin use.

METHODS

We excluded patients with a history of hepatocellular cancer, liver transplants, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and intra-abdominal malignancies. Patients with cirrhosis were followed from their first hepatologist clinical encounter (January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021) for 180 days to determine PVT incidence. We tested the association of statin use with PVT using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2785 patients with cirrhosis (mean age:61.0 ± 12.3 years, 44.3% female, 63.8% White, mean MELD-Na score:11.7 ± 6.1, and statin use:23.1%). A total of 89 patients developed PVT during the follow-up, which was lower in patients with statin use as compared to no statin use (1.3% vs 3.8%, P = 0.001, unadjusted HR:0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.62, P = 0.001). After matching for demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic decompensation events, patients with statin use had a lower risk of developing PVT in 180-day follow-up as compared to those without statin use (HR:0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.55, P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that statin use was associated with lower PVT incidence in non-NASH (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.54, P = 0.002) and decompensated cirrhosis (HR: 0.12, 95% CI:0.03-0.53, P = 0.005) than no statin use.

CONCLUSION

PVT incidence was lower in decompensated cirrhosis patients with statin use than in those with no statin use. However, this finding needs to be further tested in randomized control trials.

Variations in Practice Among Cirrhotic Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis and Esophageal Varices: A North American Survey Study

INTRODUCTION

There exists variation regarding the approach to anticoagulation and variceal hemorrhage (VH) prophylaxis among patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

A survey was distributed to gastroenterology and hepatology providers to assess the approach to anticoagulation and VH prophylaxis among patients with PVT in cirrhotic patients.

RESULTS

Providers were more likely to start anticoagulation if the patient was listed for liver transplantation, was symptomatic, or had superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. For prevention of first VH, many providers opt for combination therapy with both nonselective beta blockers and variceal ligation.

DISCUSSION

Although providers agree on the clinical scenarios that merit initiation of anticoagulation, practice variation was identified in the means of preventing first VH.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Visceral Vein Thrombosis: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline

Splanchnic or visceral vein thromboses (VVTs) are atypical thrombotic entities and include thrombosis of the portal vein, hepatic veins (Budd-Chiari syndrome), mesenteric veins, and splenic vein. All VVTs have in common high 30-day mortality up to 20% and it seems to be difficult to diagnose VVT early because of their rarity and their wide spectrum of unspecific symptoms. VVTs are often associated with myeloproliferative neoplasia, thrombophilia, and liver cirrhosis. VVT is primarily diagnosed by sonography and/or computed tomography. In contrast to venous thromboembolism, D-dimer testing is neither established nor helpful. Anticoagulation is the first-line therapy in patients with stable circulation and no evidence of organ complications. Anticoagulation improves significantly recanalization rates and stops the progress of thrombosis. Low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct-acting oral anticoagulants are possible anticoagulants, but it is noteworthy to be aware that all recommendations supporting the off-label use of anticoagulants are based on poor evidence and consist predominantly of case series, observational studies, or studies with small case numbers. When choosing a suitable anticoagulation, the individual risk of bleeding and thrombosis must be weighted very carefully. In cases of bleeding, bowel infarction, or other complications, the optimal therapy should be determined on a case-by-case basis by an experienced multidisciplinary team involving a surgeon. Besides anticoagulation, there are therapeutic options including thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, stenting, transjugular placement of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, liver transplantation, and ischemic bowel resection. This article gives an overview of current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Management of Nonmalignant Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of cirrhosis especially at the stage of decompensations. The diagnosis of PVT in cirrhosis is often incidental and it may be detected during routine semestral abdominal ultrasound with Doppler during screening for hepatocellular carcinoma or during hospitalization for decompensated cirrhosis. After detection of PVT on abdominal ultrasound, it is important to evaluate patients with cross-sectional imaging to determine the age of thrombus, whether acute or chronic, the extent and degree of luminal occlusion of the portal vein, and to rule out hepatocellular carcinoma or other underlying malignancy. Factors influencing management include the degree and extent of luminal occlusion of PVT, potential listing for liver transplantation, and portal hypertension (PHT) complications such as variceal hemorrhage and refractory ascites, severity of thrombocytopenia, and other comorbidities including chronic kidney disease. Anticoagulation is the most common therapeutic option and it is specially indicated in patients who are candidates for liver transplantation. Interventional procedures including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement and mechanical thrombectomy may be used on a case-by-case basis in patients with contraindications or adverse events related to anticoagulation, who develop worsening PVT while on anticoagulant therapy, or have chronic PVT and PHT complications that are not manageable medically or endoscopically.

Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 2 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common predisposing conditions for PVT are chronic liver diseases (cirrhosis), primary or secondary hepatobiliary malignancy, major infectious or inflammatory abdominal disease, or myeloproliferative disorders. Methods: PVT can be classified on the basis of the anatomical site, the degree of venous occlusion, and the timing and type of presentation. The main differential diagnosis of PVT, both acute and chronic, is malignant portal vein invasion, most frequently by hepatocarcinoma, or constriction (typically by pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma). Results: The management of PVT is based on anticoagulation and the treatment of predisposing conditions. The aim of anticoagulation in acute thrombosis is to prevent the extension of the clot and enable the recanalization of the vein to avoid the development of complications, such as intestinal infarction and portal hypertension. Conclusions: The treatment with anticoagulant therapy favors the reduction of portal hypertension, and this allows for a decrease in the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with esophageal varices. The anticoagulant treatment is generally recommended for at least three to six months. Prosecution of anticoagulation is advised until recanalization or lifelong if the patient has an underlying permanent pro-coagulant condition that cannot be corrected or if there is thrombosis extending to the mesenteric veins.

Safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol in patients with cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) against the combined treatment of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and propranolol in managing patients with cirrhosis diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

A literature search from inception to September 2023 was performed using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. The main measured outcomes were the incidence and recurrence of variceal bleeding (VB), hepatic encephalopathy, and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies were included. For variceal eradication, there was initially no significant difference between the groups; however, after sensitivity analysis, a significant effect emerged (risk ratio [RR], 1.55; P < .0001). TIPS was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of VB (RR, 0.34; P < .0001) and a higher probability of remaining free of VB in the first 2 years after the procedure (first year: RR, 1.41; P < .0001; second year: RR, 1.58; P < .0001). TIPS significantly reduced the incidence of death due to acute GI bleeding compared with EBL + propranolol (RR, 0.37; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

TIPS offers a comprehensive therapeutic advantage over the combined EBL and propranolol regimen, especially for patients with cirrhosis with PVT. Its efficacy in variceal eradication, reducing rebleeding, and mitigating death risks due to acute GI bleeding is evident.

Managing a Prospective Liver Transplant Recipient on the Waiting List

The management of a patient in the peri-transplantation period is highly challenging, and it is even more difficult while the patient is on the transplantation waitlist. Keeping the patient alive during this period involves managing the complications of liver disease and preventing the disease's progression. Based on the pre-transplantation etiology and type of liver failure, there is a difference in the management protocol. The current review is divided into different sections, which include: the management of underlying cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension, treatment and identification of infections, portal vein thrombosis management, and particular emphasis on the management of patients of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure in the transplantation waitlist. The review highlights special concerns in the management of patients in the Asian subcontinent also. The review also addresses the issue of delisting from the transplant waitlist to see that futility does not overtake the utility of organs. The treatment modalities are primarily expressed in tabular format for quick reference. The following review integrates the vast issues in this period concisely so that the management during this crucial period is taken care of in the best possible way.

A narrative review of acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis: from pathogenesis to clinical management

Acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis (APISVT) is an important sequela complication of acute pancreatitis, which may cause poor prognosis, such as severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bowel ischemic necrosis and liver failure. However, its mechanism remains uncertain, and there is not a general consensus on the management. In this study, we reviewed the latest academic publications in APISVT, and discussed its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, adverse outcome and treatment, especially focused on the role of anticoagulant therapy. It was indicated that anticoagulation therapy can significantly elevate thrombus recanalization and reduce the incidence of complications and mortality with no increase of bleeding. Actually, as most of these studies were retrospective analyses and prospective studies included small samples, the conclusion remains controversial. Thus, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urged to verify the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy for APISVT.

The molecular landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with splanchnic vein thrombosis: Current perspective

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are classically represented by polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs are significantly associated with morbidity and mortality related to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events. They show a consistent association with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), either represented by the portal, mesenteric or splenic vein thrombosis, or Budd-Chiari Syndrome. SVT is also a frequent presenting manifestation of MPN. MPNs associated with SVT show a predilection for younger women, high association with JAK2V617F mutation, low JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (generally <10 %), and low rates of CALR, MPL, or JAK2 exon 12 mutations. Next-Generation Sequencing techniques have contributed to deepening our knowledge of the molecular landscape of such cases, with potential diagnostic and prognostic implications. In this narrative review, we analyze the current perspective on the molecular background of MPN associated with SVT, pointing as well future directions in this field.

Portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

Background/Aim. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) has a prevalence of 0.6?26%. It is most commonly discovered incidentally as part of the evaluation of LC or in the context of acute decompensation of LC due to portal hypertension. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of PVT in patients with LC in relation to the severity of the disease and individual elements of portal hypertension. Methods. A total of 326 patients treated for LC decompensation were included in a retrospective study. Standard laboratory analyses, abdominal ultrasonography and/or computed tomography, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed. Results. The diameter of the portal vein (PV) differed between patients without esophageal varices (12.2 mm) and those with large varices (13.6 mm), p = 0.026. PVT was identified in 6.1% of patients with LC. The patients were classified according to the Child-Pugh scoring system, which has the A, B, and C categories used to assess the severity of liver disease. PVT was present in 3.0% of patients in class C and 12.0% in class B, while none of the patients in class A had PVT (p = 0.005). PVT was present in 4.4% of patients with small varices and 16.7% with large varices (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the presence of PVT between the groups of patients with and without variceal bleeding nor between groups with different degrees of ascites. A fatal outcome occurred in 29.4% of patients, but there was no difference between patients with and without PVT. Conclusion. PVT is present in more advanced stages of LC and predominantly in patients with large esophageal varices. There was no higher prevalence of PVT observed with the occurrence of variceal bleeding or with the death outcome in patients with LC.

How to manage splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with liver disease

Liver cirrhosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) are strictly correlated. Portal vein thrombosis, the most common location of SVT, is frequently diagnosed in liver cirrhosis (pooled incidence 4.6 per 100 patient-years), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (reported in 24%-28% of SVT patients). In cirrhosis-associated SVT, anticoagulant treatment reduces mortality rates, thrombosis extension, and major bleeding, and increases the rates of recanalization, compared to no treatment. Achieving vessel recanalization improves the prognosis of cirrhotic patients by reducing liver-related complications (such as variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy). Anticoagulation should be therefore routinely prescribed to cirrhotic patients with acute SVT unless contraindicated by active bleeding associated with hemodynamic impairment or by excessively high bleeding risk. Of note, early treatment is associated with higher probability of achieving vessel recanalization. The standard treatment consists of low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by oral anticoagulants (eg, vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants), if not contraindicated by severe liver dysfunction. Cirrhotic patients with SVT should be treated long-term (especially if candidate for liver transplantation) since liver cirrhosis is a persistent risk factor for recurrent thrombosis. In this review, we discuss the management of SVT in patients with liver cirrhosis, with a focus on the anticoagulant treatment in terms of indications, timing, drugs, duration, and particular scenarios, such as gastroesophageal varices and thrombocytopenia.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis: A state of art

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a manifestation of venous thromboembolism in an unusual site. Portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins are the most common vessels involved in SVT which occurs mainly in patients with liver cirrhosis, although non-cirrhotic patients could be affected as well. Thrombosis of hepatic veins, also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, is another manifestation of SVT. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are mandatory in order to increase the recalization rate and reduce the risk of thrombus progression and hypertensive complications. Traditional anticoagulation with heparin and vitamin-K antagonists is the treatment of choice in these cases. However, recent studies have shown promising results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting. Available results are mainly based on retrospective studies with small sample size, but first clinical trials have been published in the last years. This manuscript aims to provide an updated overview of the current evidence regarding the role of DOACs for SVT in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Nonviral or Drug-Induced Etiologies of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (Autoimmune, Vascular, and Malignant)

Vascular, autoimmune hepatitis, and malignant causes of acute-on-chronic liver failure are rare but important to consider and investigate in patients with underlying liver disease who present with acute deterioration and other more common etiologies have been excluded. Vascular processes including Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis require imaging for diagnosis and anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy. Patients may require advanced interventional therapy including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or consideration of liver transplantation. Autoimmune hepatitis is a complex disease entity that requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and can present heterogeneously.

Anticoagulation therapy for portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, which is significantly associated with progressive hepatic decompensation such as ascites and a high mortality risk. Anticoagulation may associate with higher PVT regression rates, but the safety of anticoagulation should be considered.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy for PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of cirrhotic patients diagnosed with PVT from January 2018 to December 2021, comparing those who received anticoagulation therapy to those who did not. Thirty-two patients received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, or rivaroxaban (anticoagulation group), and 52 were untreated (non-anticoagulation group). All patients were followed to assess the evolution of PVT (thrombus regression, stable, and progression) and the adverse effects of anticoagulation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were followed for a median 13 mo (IQR: 6-24 mo). Thirty-two patients (38.1%) received anticoagulation therapy. Anticoagulation therapy was associated with a higher PVT regression rate (50.0% vs 23.1%, P = 0.010) (univariable hazard ratio [HR] for regression of PVT with anticoagulation = 0.300, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.116-0.773, P = 0.013; multivariable HR for regression of PVT with anticoagulation = 0.185, 95%CI: 0.061-0.560, P = 0.003). Anticoagulation therapy was stopped in six patients because of adverse effects, of which two were due to abdominal pain, two due to gastrointestinal bleeding, and two due to hematuria. Symptoms improved after drug withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support anticoagulation therapy in cirrhotic patients with non-malignant PVT, since anticoagulation seems safe and associated with superior PVT regression rates.

Austrian consensus on the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease (Billroth IV)

The Billroth IV consensus was developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on the 26th of November 2022 in Vienna.Based on international recommendations and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth IV consensus provides guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease.

Interventional Approach to Portal Vein Thrombosis and Liver Transplantation: State of the Art

Porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well-recognized but uncommon disease entity in patients with and without cirrhosis. Given the complexity of these patients, there are many differing treatment algorithms depending on the individual circumstances of a given patient. The focus of this review is primarily patients with cirrhosis, with an emphasis on liver transplantation considerations. The presence of cirrhosis substantially affects work-up, prognosis, and management of these patients and will substantially affect the patient treatment and have additional implications for prognosis and long-term outcomes. Here, we review the incidence of portal vein thrombosis in known cirrhotic patients, medical and interventional treatment options that are currently used, and, in particular, how to approach cirrhotic patients with PVT who are awaiting liver transplantation.

Management of splanchnic vein thrombosis

The expression splanchnic vein thrombosis encompasses Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. These disorders have common characteristics: they are both rare diseases which can cause portal hypertension and its complications. Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis in the absence of underlying liver disease share many risk factors, among which myeloproliferative neoplasms represent the most common; a rapid comprehensive work-up for risk factors of thrombosis is needed in these patients. Long-term anticoagulation is indicated in most patients. Portal vein thrombosis can also develop in patients with cirrhosis and in those with porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease. The presence and nature of underlying liver disease impacts the management of portal vein thrombosis. Indications for anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis are growing, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is now a second-line option. Due to the rarity of these diseases, studies yielding high-grade evidence are scarce. However, collaborative studies have provided new insight into the management of these patients. This article focuses on the causes, diagnosis, and management of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome, portal vein thrombosis without underlying liver disease, or cirrhosis with non-malignant portal vein thrombosis.

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: a multicenter real life cοhort study

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of cirrhosis and can be a cause or consequence of liver disease progression. It is unclear whether PVT treatment is affecting clinical outcomes in cirrhotics.

METHODS

This is a multicenter study of cirrhotics with PVT, initially retrospectively and thereafter prospectively registered in a data base. We studied the impact of PVT treatment on this population for efficacy, safety and the impact on survival. In survival analysis Mantel-Cox and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan tests were used. A P value of <0.05, was considered significant. For statistical computations the STATA 12.1 was used.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included (76% decompensated, median MELD score 12 and Child-Pugh score 7), 47% with concomitant HCC. Fifty-one patients with PVT were treated with Vitamin-K antagonists or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months after PVT diagnosis, or until death or transplantation. PV patency after 6 months was not statistically different between patients receiving or not anticoagulation (complete-partial recanalization 27.4% of treated vs. 20% of untreated, P=0.21). Median survival was statistically worse between patients treated with anticoagulation than those untreated (10 vs. 15 months, P=0.036). Less portal hypertensive bleeding and less decompensation rates were found in treated cirrhotics vs. untreated (45.8% vs. 54.2%, P=0.003 and 78% vs. 80.9%, P=0.78, respectively). Patients with HCC had worse survival when treated vs. untreated (P=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of cirrhotics with PVT, treatment was feasible with acceptable side effects, but without meaningful clinical benefits.

Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

The administration of an anticoagulant in patients with liver disease (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-NASH, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-NAFLD, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis) who have an indication (atrial fibrillation, venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) is challenging because there is an imbalance between thrombosis and bleeding. There is a need to focus our attention on preventing risk factors because diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, smoking, and sedentary behavior are risk factors for both NASH/NAFLD and AF, and these patients require anticoagulant treatment. Patients with advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh C) were excluded from studies, so vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are still recommended. Currently, VKAs are recommended for other conditions (antiphospholipid syndrome, mitral valve stenosis, and mechanical valve prosthesis). Amongst the patients under chronic anticoagulant treatment, especially for the elderly, bleeding as a result of the improper use of warfarin is one of the important causes of emergency admissions due to adverse reactions. DOACs are considered to be efficient and safe, with apixaban offering superior protection against stroke and a good safety profile as far as major bleeding is concerned compared to warfarin. DOACs are safe in the Child-Pugh A and B classes (except rivaroxaban), and in the Child-Pugh C class are contraindicated. Given that there are certain and reliable data for chronic kidney disease regarding the recommendations, in liver function impairment more randomized studies must be carried out, as the current data are still uncertain. In particular, DOACs have a simple administration, minimal medication interactions, a high safety and effectiveness profile, and now a reversal agent is available (for dabigatran and idarucizumab). Patients are also statistically more compliant and do not require INR monitoring.

Anticoagulant therapy for splanchnic vein thrombosis: recent updates for patients with liver cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Liver cirrhosis is accompanied by several hemostatic alterations, which contribute to the current theory of "rebalanced hemostasis." Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a frequent complication of liver cirrhosis (17-26% of the cirrhotic patients), and liver cirrhosis is a common risk factor for SVT (24-28% of SVT cases).

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review aims to describe the current state of the art on the anticoagulant treatment of cirrhotic SVT, with a particular focus on the possible role of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and recent guidelines on this topic.

EXPERT OPINION

Early anticoagulant therapy is recommended in cirrhotic patients with acute SVT, to obtain vessel recanalization and decrease the rates of portal hypertension-related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulation, if adequate prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is established, and varices band ligation can be safely performed without the need to stop the anticoagulant treatment. The conventional treatment of cirrhotic SVT consisted of low molecular weight heparin, as initial treatment of choice, eventually followed by vitamin K antagonists, but the DOACs can be considered as a reasonable alternative in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis.

Efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy for portal venous system thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of thrombolytic therapy in patients with portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) remains ambiguous. This study aimed to systematically collect available evidence and evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis for PVST.

METHODS

Eligible studies were searched via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Among the cohort studies, meta-analyses were performed to assess the outcomes of PVST patients receiving thrombolysis. Pooled proportions were calculated. Among the case reports and case series, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for outcomes of PVST patients receiving thrombolysis. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 2134 papers initially identified, 29 cohort studies and 131 case reports or case series were included. Based on the cohort studies, the pooled rates of overall response to thrombolytic therapy, complete recanalization of PVST, bleeding events during thrombolysis, further bowel resection, thrombosis recurrence, and 30-day mortality were 93%, 58%, 18%, 3%, 1%, and 4%, respectively. Based on the case reports and case series, acute pancreatitis (OR = 0.084), history of liver transplantation (OR = 13.346), and interval between onset of symptoms and initiation of thrombolysis ≤14 days (OR = 3.105) were significantly associated with complete recanalization of PVST; acute pancreatitis (OR = 6.556) was significantly associated with further bowel resection; but no factors associated with the overall response to thrombolytic therapy, bleeding events during thrombolysis, thrombosis recurrence, and 30-day mortality were identified or could be calculated.

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of thrombolysis should be effective for the treatment of PVST. But its benefits for PVST secondary to acute pancreatitis are weakened.

Evolution of care in cirrhosis: Preventing hepatic decompensation through pharmacotherapy

Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, impacting more than 120 million people worldwide. Although geographic differences exist, etiologic factors such as alcohol use disorder, chronic viral hepatitis infections, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are prevalent in nearly every region. Historically, significant effort has been devoted to modifying these risks to prevent disease progression. Nevertheless, more than 11% of patients with compensated cirrhosis experience hepatic decompensation each year. This transition signifies the most important prognostic factor in the natural history of the disease, corresponding to a decline in median survival to below 2 years. Over the past decade, the need for pharmacotherapies aimed at reducing the risk for hepatic decompensation has been emphasized, and non-selective beta-blockers have emerged as the most effective option to date. However, a critical therapeutic gap still exists, and additional therapies have been proposed, including statins, rifaximin, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Based on the results of innovative retrospective analyses and small-scale prospective trials, these pharmacotherapies represent promising options, but further studies, including randomized controlled trials, are necessary before they can be incorporated into clinical use. This report highlights the potential impact of these agents and others in preventing hepatic decompensation and discusses how this paradigm shift may pave the way for guideline-directed medical therapy in cirrhosis.

Clinical outcomes of antithrombin III-based therapy for patients with portal vein thrombosis: A retrospective, multicenter study

AIM

The association between thrombolytic therapy and the outcome in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome in patients with PVT who received antithrombin III-based therapy.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, multicenter study to investigate the liver-related events and the survival rates in 240 patients with PVT who received the therapy.

RESULTS

The patients comprised 151 men and 89 women, with a median age of 69 years. The rate of favorable response, defined as maximum area of PVT changed to ≤75%, was 67.5% (162/240). The cumulative rates of liver-related events at 1, 2, and 3 years were 38.2%, 53.9%, and 68.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that viable hepatocellular carcinoma, absence of maintenance therapy, non-responder, and PVT progression were significantly associated with liver-related events. The PVT progression was observed in 23.3% (56/240). The multivariate analysis identified older age, absence of maintenance therapy, and non-responder as independent factors associated with PVT progression. The multivariate analysis revealed that younger age, no hepatocellular carcinoma, presence of maintenance therapy, and lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium score significantly contributed to 3-year survival. Of the 240 patients, 13 (8.9%) prematurely discontinued treatment due to any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that maintenance therapy, favorable response, and absence of PVT progression may suppress or control liver-related events in antithrombin III-based therapy for patients with PVT. Specifically, maintenance therapy could suppress not only liver-related events, but also PVT progression and improve the prognosis.

Rational hemostatic management in cirrhosis: from old paradigms to new clinical challenges

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cirrhosis are at risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Traditional hemostatic tests are inadequate to assess the complex and fragile balance of hemostasis in this setting, especially in advanced stages of disease such as decompensated cirrhosis or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of pro-hemostatic agents for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes is still debated and often contraindicated. Alongside, splanchnic, and peripheral thrombotic events are frequent in this population and require management that involves a careful balance between risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to address the state of the art on the clinical management of the hemostatic balance of cirrhosis in terms of established knowledge and future challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

The old paradigm of cirrhosis as a naturally anticoagulated condition has been challenged by more sophisticated global tests of hemostasis. Integrating this information in the clinical decision-making is still challenging for physicians and experts in hemostasis.

Perioperative Challenges in a Septic Shock Patient With Extensive Splanchnic and Extra-Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis Up to the Right Atrium

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has a significant disease burden worldwide and comprises deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT most commonly occurs in the lower extremities, very rarely it can present in the splanchnic venous circulation or inferior vena cava or both. We report an unusual presentation of a 68-year-old woman with septic shock secondary to ischemic bowel, complicated by non-tumor related, extensive right hepatic vein thrombosis extending up to the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium. She underwent bowel resection surgery emergently and was started on systemic anticoagulation in the perioperative period after an extensive evaluation and resuscitation. She was managed by a multidisciplinary team during her admission and was discharged after four weeks. This case poses an interesting therapeutic challenge to the team as there is little literature to guide treatment in a critically ill patient with ischemic bowel, septic shock with extensive splanchnic and IVC thrombosis who also had likely pseudo-heparin resistance with artifactual activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values. This case report seeks to share our experience of a multidisciplinary and patient-centric approach in this rare presentation of a disease spectrum.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Cirrhosis: A Comprehensive Review

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients-pathogenesis, risk factors, and implications on management

Along with the worldwide increase in obesity and metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its more severe subset, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are on path to become the leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States. NAFLD, as well as obesity, create an inflammatory milieu via the release of adipocytokines. In turn, the inflammatory environment can trigger an increase in prothrombotic factors. Independent of inflammation, the severity of NASH is associated with a graded increase in hypercoagulability such as an increase in factor VIII, increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and decrease in protein C. Ultimately, this environment creates an increase in thrombotic risk, leading to higher rates of pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with NASH cirrhosis vesus other causes of cirrhosis. Many studies have shown worse outcomes in liver transplant recipients with PVT as it complicates anastomotic reconstruction which can negatively affect portal blood supply needed for adequate liver functioning. Management and treatment of PVT is not standardized, but from a pharmacologic standpoint, multiple classes of anticoagulants have shown to be successful in recanalization of the portal vein and preventing recurrence of clot with minimal bleeding complications. The increasing prevalence of NASH cirrhosis and subsequent increase in PVT require further research for improved outcomes.

Portal vein thrombosis in a noncirrhotic patient after hemihepatectomy: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a condition caused by hemodynamic disorders. It may be noted in the portal vein system when there is an inflammatory stimulus in the abdominal cavity. However, PVT is rarely reported after hepatectomy. At present, related guidelines and major expert opinions tend to consider vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as the standard treatment. But based on research, direct oral anticoagulants may be more effective and safe for noncirrhotic PVT and are also beneficial by reducing the recurrence rate of PVT.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old woman without any history of disease felt discomfort in her right upper abdomen for 20 d, with worsening for 7 d. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the upper abdomen showed right liver intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with multiple intrahepatic metastases but not to the left liver. Therefore, she underwent right hepatic and caudate lobectomy. One week after surgery, the patient underwent a CECT scan, due to nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distension. Thrombosis in the left branch and main trunk of the portal vein and near the confluence of the splenic vein was found. After using LMWH for 22 d, CECT showed no filling defect in the portal vein system.

CONCLUSION

Although PVT after hepatectomy is rare, it needs to be prevented during the perioperative period.

Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis of the liver are at high risk of developing portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which has a complex, multifactorial cause. The condition may present with a myriad of symptoms and can occasionally cause severe complications. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PVT. There are uncertainties regarding the effect on PVT and its treatment outcome in patients with cirrhosis. The main challenge for managing PVT in cirrhosis is analyzing the risk of hemorrhage compared to the risk of thrombus extension leading to complications. All current knowledge regarding non-tumor PVT in cirrhosis, including epidemiology, risk factors, classification, clinical presentation, diagnosis, impact on natural history, and treatment, is discussed in the present article.