A Proton Pump Inhibitor a Day Keeps the Iron Away

Ferroptosis and Its Multifaceted Role in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approach

Ferroptosis, a new type of non-apoptotic cell death modality, is different from other modes of cell death and has been primarily found in tumor cells. Previous studies have reported that ferroptosis can be triggered by specific modulators (e.g., drugs, nutrients, and iron chelators), leading to increased intracellular lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and iron overload. Recent reports have shown that ferroptosis at the cellular and organism levels can prevent an inflammatory storm and cancer development. Emerging evidence suggests potential mechanisms (e.g., system Xc-, glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), lipid peroxidation, glutathione (GSH), and iron chelators) are involved in ferroptosis, which may mediate biological processes such as oxidative stress and iron overload to treat cancer. To date, there are at least three pathways that mediate ferroptosis in cancer cells: system Xc-/GSH/GPX4, FSP1/CoQ10/NAD(P)H, and ATG5/ATG7/NCOA4. Here, we summarize recent advances in the occurrence and development of ferroptosis in the context of cancer, the associations between ferroptosis and various modulators, and the potential mechanisms and therapeutic strategies targeting ferroptosis for the treatment of cancer.

Proton pump inhibition for secondary hemochromatosis in hereditary anemia: a phase III placebo-controlled randomized cross-over clinical trial

Iron overload is a severe general complication of hereditary anemias. Treatment with iron chelators is hampered by important side‐effects, high costs, and the lack of availability in many countries with a high prevalence of hereditary anemias. In this phase III randomized placebo‐controlled trial, we assigned adults with non‐transfusion‐dependent hereditary anemias with mild‐to‐moderate iron overload to receive esomeprazole (at a dose of 40 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 months in a cross‐over design. The primary end point was change of liver iron content measured by MRI. A total of 30 participants were enrolled in the trial. Treatment with esomeprazole resulted in a statistically significant reduction in liver iron content that was 0.55 mg Fe/g dw larger than after treatment with placebo (95%CI [0.05 to 1.06]; p = 0.03). Median baseline liver iron content at the start of esomeprazole was 4.99 versus 4.49 mg Fe/g dw at start of placebo. Mean delta liver iron content after esomeprazole treatment was −0.57 (SD 1.20) versus −0.11 mg Fe/g dw (SD 0.75) after placebo treatment. Esomeprazole was well tolerated, reported adverse events were mild and none of the patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. In summary, esomeprazole resulted in a significant reduction in liver iron content when compared to placebo in a heterogeneous group of patients with non‐transfusion‐dependent hereditary anemias. From an international perspective this result can have major implications given the fact that proton pump inhibitors may frequently be the only realistic therapy for many patients without access to or not tolerating iron chelators.

Anti-Acid Drug Treatment Induces Changes in the Gut Microbiome Composition of Hemodialysis Patients

Anti-acid drugs, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and histamine-2 blocker (H₂-blocker), are commonly prescribed to treat gastrointestinal disorders. These anti-acid drugs alter gut microbiota in the general population, but their effects are not known in hemodialysis patients. Hence, we investigated the microbiota composition in hemodialysis patients treated with PPIs or H₂-blocker. Among 193 hemodialysis patients, we identified 32 H₂-blocker users, 23 PPI users, and 138 no anti-acid drug subjects. Fecal samples were obtained to analyze the gut microbiome using 16S RNA amplicon sequencing. Differences in the microbial composition of the H₂-blocker users, PPI users, and controls were assessed using linear discriminant analysis effect size and the random forest algorithm. The species richness or evenness (α-diversity) was similar among the three groups, whereas the inter-individual diversity (β-diversity) was different between H₂-blocker users, PPI users, and controls. Hemodialysis patients treated with H₂-blocker and PPIs had a higher microbial dysbiosis index than the controls, with a significant increase in the genera Provetella 2, Phascolarctobacterium, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, and Eubacterium oxidoreducens group in H₂-blocker users, and Streptococcus and Veillonella in PPI users. In addition, compared to the H₂-blocker users, there was a significant enrichment of the genera Streptococcus in PPI users, as confirmed by the random forest analysis and the confounder-adjusted regression model. In conclusion, PPIs significantly changed the gut microbiota composition in hemodialysis patients compared to H₂-blocker users or controls. Importantly, the Streptococcus genus was significantly increased in PPI treatment. These findings caution against the overuse of PPIs.

Positive Iron Balance in Chronic Kidney Disease: How Much is Too Much and How to Tell?

BACKGROUND

Regulation of body iron occurs at cellular, tissue, and systemic levels. In healthy individuals, iron absorption and losses are minimal, creating a virtually closed system. In the setting of chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis (HD), increased iron losses, reduced iron absorption, and limited iron availability lead to iron deficiency. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy is frequently prescribed to replace lost iron, but determining an individual's iron balance and stores can be challenging and imprecise, contributing to uncertainty about the long-term safety of IV iron therapy.

SUMMARY

Patients on HD receiving judicious doses of IV iron are likely to be in a state of positive iron balance, yet this does not appear to confer an overt risk for clinically relevant iron toxicity. The concomitant use of iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, the use of maintenance iron dosing regimens, and the reticuloendothelial distribution of hepatic iron deposition likely minimize the potential for iron toxicity in patients on HD. Key Messages: Because no single diagnostic test can, at present, accurately assess iron status and risk for toxicity, clinicians need to take an integrative approach to avoid iron doses that impose excessive exposure while ensuring sufficient replenishment of iron stores capable of overcoming hepcidin blockade and allowing for effective erythropoiesis.