1
|
Awad A, Hollis E, Goyanes A, Orlu M, Gaisford S, Basit AW. 3D printed multi-drug-loaded suppositories for acute severe ulcerative colitis. Int J Pharm X 2023; 5:100165. [PMID: 36876053 PMCID: PMC9982042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2023.100165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a growing health burden that often requires treatment with multiple therapeutic agents. As inflammation is localised in the rectum and colon, local drug delivery using suppositories could improve therapeutic outcomes. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a novel manufacturing tool that permits the combination of multiple drugs in personalised dosage forms, created based on each patient's disease condition. This study, for the first time, demonstrates the feasibility of producing 3D printed suppositories with two anti-inflammatory agents, budesonide and tofacitinib citrate, for the treatment of ASUC. As both drugs are poorly water-soluble, the suppositories' ability to self-emulsify was exploited to improve their performance. The suppositories were fabricated via semi-solid extrusion (SSE) 3D printing and contained tofacitinib citrate and budesonide in varying doses (10 or 5 mg; 4 or 2 mg, respectively). The suppositories displayed similar dissolution and disintegration behaviours irrespective of their drug content, demonstrating the flexibility of the technology. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using SSE 3D printing to create multi-drug suppositories for the treatment of ASUC, with the possibility of titrating the drug doses based on the disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atheer Awad
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Eleanor Hollis
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Alvaro Goyanes
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.,FabRx Ltd., Henwood House, Henwood, Ashford, Kent TN24 8DH, UK.,Departamento de Farmacología, Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, I+D Farma (GI-1645), Facultad de Farmacia, Materials institute (iMATUS) and Health Research Institute (IDIS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Mine Orlu
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Simon Gaisford
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Abdul W Basit
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.,FabRx Ltd., Henwood House, Henwood, Ashford, Kent TN24 8DH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quera R, Núñez P, Sicilia B, Flores L, Gomollón F. Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option? GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46:716-726. [PMID: 36375697 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Quera
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paulina Núñez
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile; Sección de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Facultad Medicina Occidente, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, España
| | - Lilian Flores
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, CIBEREHD, Zaragoza, España.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aruljothy A, Singh S, Narula N, Moran GW, Vuyyuru SK, Hogan M, Zayadi A, MacDonald JK, Caron B, Danese S, Peyrin Biroulet L, Ma C, Jairath V. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Medical therapies for treatment of ulcerative proctitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:740-762. [PMID: 37589498 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common highly symptomatic form of ulcerative colitis that can be difficult to treat. AIM To assess the efficacy of medical treatments for UP. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 23 November 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for adults with UP. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. RESULTS We included 53 RCTs (n = 4096) including 46 induction studies (n = 3731) and seven maintenance studies (n = 365). First-line therapies included topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), conventional corticosteroids, budesonide, and oral 5-ASA. Therapy for refractory UP included topical tacrolimus and small molecules. Topical 5-ASA was superior to placebo for induction (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.94-3.82) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26-3.46). Topical corticosteroids were superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.62-4.92). Topical budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44-3.81). Combination therapy with topical 5-ASA and topical corticosteroids was superior to topical monotherapy with either agent. Topical tacrolimus was superior to placebo. Etrasimod was superior to placebo for induction (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.2-18.49) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.31-3.32). CONCLUSIONS Topical 5-ASA and corticosteroids are effective for active UP. Topical 5-ASA may be effective for maintenance of remission. Tacrolimus may be effective for induction of remission. Etrasimod may be effective for induction and for maintenance of remission. Trials should include UP to expand the evidence base for this under-represented population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achuthan Aruljothy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon W Moran
- National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sudheer K Vuyyuru
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Benedicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Christopher Ma
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McCoubrey LE, Favaron A, Awad A, Orlu M, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Colonic drug delivery: Formulating the next generation of colon-targeted therapeutics. J Control Release 2023; 353:1107-1126. [PMID: 36528195 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Colonic drug delivery can facilitate access to unique therapeutic targets and has the potential to enhance drug bioavailability whilst reducing off-target effects. Delivering drugs to the colon requires considered formulation development, as both oral and rectal dosage forms can encounter challenges if the colon's distinct physiological environment is not appreciated. As the therapeutic opportunities surrounding colonic drug delivery multiply, the success of novel pharmaceuticals lies in their design. This review provides a modern insight into the key parameters determining the effective design and development of colon-targeted medicines. Influential physiological features governing the release, dissolution, stability, and absorption of drugs in the colon are first discussed, followed by an overview of the most reliable colon-targeted formulation strategies. Finally, the most appropriate in vitro, in vivo, and in silico preclinical investigations are presented, with the goal of inspiring strategic development of new colon-targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E McCoubrey
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Alessia Favaron
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Atheer Awad
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Mine Orlu
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Simon Gaisford
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Abdul W Basit
- 29 - 39 Brunswick Square, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caron B, Jairath V, D'Amico F, Paridaens K, Magro F, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Definition of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis in clinical trials: A systematic literature review. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:854-867. [PMID: 36029157 PMCID: PMC9557958 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
We performed a systematic review to investigate the definition of mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis (UC), and to describe predictors of good response to treatment in clinical trials assessing 5‐ASA and/or budesonide. Thirty‐nine randomized controlled trials were included. The UC Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) was the most frequent score used for defining mild to moderate active UC (16 studies, 41%), followed by Clinical Activity Index in 11 studies (28.2%). Four different cut‐offs were used to define mild to moderate active UC using the UCDAI. The most frequently reported predictors of good response to treatment was a mild and moderate disease activity. There is heterogeneity in the definition of mild to moderate active UC in randomized clinical trials. A standardized definition of mild to moderate active UC used for inclusion of patients in clinical trials is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Alimentiv Inc, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Fernando Magro
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, São João University Hospital Center (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caron B, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, Schreiber S, Hart A, Solitano V, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents for Ulcerative Proctitis: A Systematic Literature Review. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:922-930. [PMID: 34850857 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis is a common and often highly symptomatic form of inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy of different therapies in the management of patients with ulcerative proctitis. METHODS We identified randomized controlled trials in adults with ulcerative proctitis treated with oral or topical therapies for induction of response or remission, or prevention of relapse. RESULTS A total of 32 randomized controlled trials were included [27 induction/2839 participants, five maintenance/334 participants]. Follow-up varied from 3 to 8 weeks for induction, and from 6 to 24 months for maintenance of remission. 5-Aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] suppository was the most frequently evaluated treatment [14/32, 43.7%], followed by steroid enema [7/32, 21.9%]. Topical 5-ASA demonstrated effectiveness for induction of clinical response or remission and prevention of relapse in several studies. Combined topical steroids and 5-ASA was more effective than topical 5-ASA or topical steroids alone to induce response [100% of patients for combination vs 70% for beclomethasone alone and 76% for 5-ASA alone]. One observational study suggested azathioprine may be effective in patients with ulcerative proctitis. Only two cohort studies evaluated the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ulcerative proctitis. Small molecules, anti-integrins and anti-interleukin therapies have not been evaluated in isolated ulcerative proctitis. CONCLUSION The role of topical 5-ASA as a treatment for ulcerative proctitis has been confirmed in this systematic literature review, for induction and maintenance of remission. Future trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of more recent and upcoming drug classes in patients with ulcerative proctitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Virginia Solitano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kruis W, Siegmund B, Lesniakowski K, Simanenkov V, Khimion L, Sobon M, Delmans G, Maksyashina SV, Sablin OA, Pokrotnieks J, Mostovoy Y, Datsenko O, Abdulkhakov S, Dorofeyev A, Levchenko O, Alexeeva O, Andreev P, Kolesnik IP, Mihaly E, Abrahamovych O, Baluta M, Kharchenko N, Viacheslav N, Uspenskiy Y, Vieth M, Mohrbacher R, Mueller R, Greinwald R. Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis: a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:1714-1724. [PMID: 35709376 PMCID: PMC9683080 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis. METHODS This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed. RESULTS Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam. CONCLUSIONS In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Kruis
- Corresponding author: Wolfgang Kruis, MD, Am Dorfplatz 1, 50259 Freimersdorf, Germany. E-mail:
| | - Britta Siegmund
- Department for Gastroenterology, Infectious diseases and Rheumatology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konrad Lesniakowski
- Department VII of Gastroenterology, Hepatologie and Clinical Nutrition, Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. J. Gromkowskiego, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Vladimir Simanenkov
- State Budgetary Healthcare Institution ‘City Hospital #26’, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Ludmila Khimion
- Municipal Institution of Kyiv Regional Rada ‘Kyiv Regional Clinical Hospital’, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Marcin Sobon
- Centrum Medyczne Pratia Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Glebs Delmans
- Endoscopy Department, Daugavpils Regional Hospital, Daugavpils, Latvia
| | - Svetlana V Maksyashina
- State Public Health Institution ‘Novgorod regional clinical hospital’, Velikiy Novgorod, Russian Federation
| | - Oleg A Sablin
- Federal State Budget Public Health Institution All-Russian centre of Emergency and Radiation medicine n. a., A.M.Nikiforov of Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Juris Pokrotnieks
- Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Yuriy Mostovoy
- Private small-scale enterprise “Pulse”, Therapeutical Department, Vinnitsya, Ukraine
| | - Olena Datsenko
- Municipal Institution of Healthcare ‘Prof. Shalimova Kharkiv City Clinical Hospital # 2’, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Sayar Abdulkhakov
- Federal State Budget Educational Institution of High Education ‘Kazan State Medical University’, Kazan, Russian Federation,Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of High Education ‘Kazan [Volga region] Federal University’, Kazan, Russian Federation
| | - Andriy Dorofeyev
- Ukrainian-German Gastroenterology Center ‘BYK-Kyiv’, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Olena Levchenko
- Municipal Institution ‘Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital’, Polyclinic department, Odesa, Ukraine
| | - Olga Alexeeva
- State Public Health Institution ‘Nizhny Novgorod regional clinical hospital n.a. N.A.Semashko’, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
| | - Pavel Andreev
- Non-state Public Health Institution ‘Railway clinical hospital on station Samara’ of JSC ‘Russian railways’, Samara, Russian Federation
| | - Ivan P Kolesnik
- Municipal Institution ‘Zaporizhzhya City Clinical Hospital of Urgent Care’, Surgery department #3, Zaporizhya, Ukraine
| | - Emese Mihaly
- Semmelweis Egyetem ÁOK, II. Belgyógyászati Klinika, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Orest Abrahamovych
- Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Gastroenterology department; Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | | | - Nataliia Kharchenko
- Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #8, Department of Gastroenterology. P.L. Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Neshta Viacheslav
- Municipal Institution ‘City Hospital #1’, Surgery department, Zaporizhya, Ukraine
| | - Yury Uspenskiy
- Saint-Petersburg State Public Health Institution ‘City Hospital of Saint Venerable Martyr Elizabeth’, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Michael Vieth
- Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Institute of Pathology, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ralf Mohrbacher
- Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, Clinical Research and Development, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Mueller
- Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, Clinical Research and Development, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Roland Greinwald
- Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, Clinical Research and Development, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Omer NNCDS, Araujo IDD, Cruz GMGD, Rodrigues FG. Therapeutics in Radiation-induced Proctopathy: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF COLOPROCTOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMalignant neoplasms are increasingly prevalent in the daily clinical practice. Up to 61% of patients with pelvic malignancies undergo pelvic radiotherapy in different doses, which may cause intestinal damage, and the rectum is the segment most frequently affected due to its fixed position in the pelvis. Currently, there are several strategies to minimize the effects of radiation on the tissues surrounding the neoplastic site; despite those strategies, radiotherapy can still result in serious damage to organs and structures, and these injuries accompany patients throughout their lives. One of the most common damages resulting from pelvic radiotherapy is acute proctitis.The diagnosis is confirmed by visualizing the rectal mucosa through rigid or flexible rectosigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. The objective of the present study was to review the forms of radiation-induced proctopathytherapy, and to evaluate the results of each method to propose a standardization for the treatment of this pathology. Despite the prevalence of radiation-induced proctopathy, there is no definitive standardized treatment strategy so far. The first approach can be tried with local agents, such as mesalazine and formalin. For refractory cases, control can usually be achieved with argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen, and radiofrequency ablation therapies. Regarding the study of radiation-induced proctopathy, there is a lack of robust studies with large samples and standardized therapies to be compared. There is a lack of double-blinded, randomized controlled studies to determine a definitive standard treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ivana Duval de Araujo
- Doctor and Associate Professor IV, Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Caron B, Sandborn WJ, Schreiber S, Panaccione R, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Drug development for ulcerative proctitis: current concepts. Gut 2021; 70:1203-1209. [PMID: 33789968 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Clinical Research Center-IRCCS and Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Si Y, Shao L, Gao S, Wen H. Suppository treatment in ulcerative proctitis. EUR J INFLAMM 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/20587392211015108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common form of ulcerative colitis (UC), the number of patients with UP is increasing. Suppository treatment containing mesalamine is usually the first-line choice for mild to moderate UP, here, we review the publications on mesalamine suppository in UP, to better understand its dosage, duration of therapy and adverse events in both induction and maintenance phases. We also review articles on budesonide, beclomethasone, tacrolimus, herbal medicine and acetarsol suppositories in UP, to present therapeutic strategies for patients with UP refractory to mesalamine suppository.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjie Si
- Department of Gastroenterology, Longhua Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - LanJun Shao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Qingpu District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanqing Gao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fengxian District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongzhu Wen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Longhua Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maconi G, Camatta D, Cannatelli R, Ferretti F, Carvalhas Gabrielli A, Ardizzone S. Budesonide MMX in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Current Perspectives on Efficacy and Safety. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021; 17:285-292. [PMID: 33854320 PMCID: PMC8039041 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s263835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Budesonide MMX is a low bioavailability corticosteroid oral once-daily formulation, which has a controlled rate of release throughout the colon, thanks to the multimatrix (MMX) formulation. It has been available for a decade in the USA and Europe for the induction of remission in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, particularly for those not responsive to mesalamine. The efficacy of budesonide MMX in this setting has been assessed by registrative randomized controlled trials showing a higher rate of clinical and endoscopic remission at 8 weeks compared with placebo, mostly in patients with proctosigmoiditis and left-side colitis. Since it is available in our therapeutic armamentarium, a few studies have confirmed the effectiveness of budesonide MMX also in real-life, highlighting the high rate of clinical response and remission and the high safety profile. In the present review, we summarise clinical trials and real-life results of budesonide MMX, assessing its use and predictors of response and non-response in real-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah Camatta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferretti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Carvalhas Gabrielli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences FBF - L.Sacco, University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alkhatry M, Al-Rifai A, Annese V, Georgopoulos F, Jazzar AN, Khassouan AM, Koutoubi Z, Nathwani R, Taha MS, Limdi JK. First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:6710-6769. [PMID: 33268959 PMCID: PMC7684461 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the main entities of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic remittent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence are on the rise worldwide, and the heterogeneity between patients and within individuals over time is striking. The progressive advance in our understanding of the etiopathogenesis coupled with an unprecedented increase in therapeutic options have changed the management towards evidence-based interventions by clinicians with patients. This guideline was stimulated and supported by the Emirates Gastroenterology and Hepatology Society following a systematic review and a Delphi consensus process that provided evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity, appropriate and timely use of different investigations, choice of appropriate therapy for induction and remission phase according to disease severity, and management of main complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Alkhatry
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Ibrahim Bin Hamad Obaid Allah Hospital, Ministry of Health and Prevention, Ras Al Khaiman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ahmad Al-Rifai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Vito Annese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valiant Clinic, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, American Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Ahmad N Jazzar
- Gastroenterology Division, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ahmed M Khassouan
- Digestive Disease Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Zaher Koutoubi
- Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rahul Nathwani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mazen S Taha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M8 5RB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pastorelli L, Bezzio C, Saibeni S. Hold the Foam: Why Topical Budesonide Remains Relevant for IBD Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:3066-3068. [PMID: 32189103 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Pastorelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Corso Europa 250, 20017, Rho, MI, Italy
| | - Simone Saibeni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Corso Europa 250, 20017, Rho, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blackwell J, Selinger C, Raine T, Parkes G, Smith MA, Pollok R. Steroid use and misuse: a key performance indicator in the management of IBD. Frontline Gastroenterol 2020; 12:207-213. [PMID: 33907617 PMCID: PMC8040510 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Corticosteroids remain an important tool for inducing remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but they have no role in maintenance of remission. The significant adverse side effect profile of these drugs means their use should be avoided where possible or measures taken to reduce their risk. Despite an expanding array of alternative therapies, corticosteroid dependency and excess remain common. Appropriate steroid use is now regarded a key performance indicator in the management of IBD. This article aims to outline indications for corticosteroid use in IBD, their risks and strategies to reduce their use and misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Blackwell
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- The Leeds Institute of Research at St James’, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gareth Parkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Melissa A Smith
- Digestives Diseases Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Richard Pollok
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Infection and Immunity, St George’s University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ginard D, Marín-Jiménez I, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Ricart E, Domènech E, Gisbert JP, Esteve M, Mínguez M. Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on topical therapy in ulcerative colitis. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 43:97-105. [PMID: 31839219 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Although most patients with ulcerative colitis should be given topical treatment, different studies have shown that they are underused in clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to answer 10 specific questions about which drugs are available for topical use in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and their characteristics in terms of formulation, dosage, presentation, application and proximal distribution of rectal-administered drugs. The efficacy of available topical drugs and the benefits of combining different formulations and routes of administration, and their usefulness during disease remission are evaluated. Finally, a series of recommendations addressed to patients are given on the correct application of topical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ginard
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, España.
| | - Ignacio Marín-Jiménez
- Servicio de Medicina del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, España
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
| | - Elena Ricart
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), España
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), España; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), España; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Maria Esteve
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), España; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España
| | - Miguel Mínguez
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Universitat de València, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Hendy PA, Smith PJ, Limdi JK, Hayee B, Lomer MCE, Parkes GC, Selinger C, Barrett KJ, Davies RJ, Bennett C, Gittens S, Dunlop MG, Faiz O, Fraser A, Garrick V, Johnston PD, Parkes M, Sanderson J, Terry H, Gaya DR, Iqbal TH, Taylor SA, Smith M, Brookes M, Hansen R, Hawthorne AB. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2019; 68:s1-s106. [PMID: 31562236 PMCID: PMC6872448 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1178] [Impact Index Per Article: 235.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Anthony Hendy
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Miranda C E Lomer
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth C Parkes
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - R Justin Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Systematic Research Ltd, Quorn, UK
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Aileen Fraser
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Miles Parkes
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy Sanderson
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel R Gaya
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHSFoundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Smith
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Matthew Brookes
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
|