1
|
Lewellen KA, Cavaghan MK, Fogel EL, Montero AM, House MG, Zyromski NJ. Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplant: Building a Multidisciplinary Program. Pancreas 2025; 54:e491-e493. [PMID: 40096638 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Evan L Fogel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Anne M Montero
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lewellen KA, Maatman TK, House MG, McGreevy K, Cavaghan MK, Dorwart MR, Fogel EL, Haste PM, Montero AM, Roch AM, Zyromski NJ. Total Pancreatectomy With Percutaneous Islet Autotransplant After Remote Islet Processing: A Viable Paradigm? Pancreas 2024; 53:e796-e801. [PMID: 38820448 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplant (TPIAT) is important therapy for select chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients. The specialized technique of islet isolation limits widespread TPIAT use. We hypothesized that remote islet isolation provides satisfactory islet yield and perioperative outcomes. METHODS A retrospective review of TPIAT patients between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Islet isolation was performed off-site, with percutaneous intraportal islet autotransplant (IAT) completed the morning following pancreatectomy. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent TPIAT; median age was 43 (interquartile range, 12.5) years. Operation occurred 7.5 (14.8) years after pancreatitis diagnosis. The most common pancreatitis etiology was genetic (50%). All patients underwent preoperative endoscopic therapy; three underwent prior pancreatectomy. Operative time was 236 (51) minutes; subsequent percutaneous IAT time was 87 (35) minutes. The islet equivalent (IEQ)/kilogram (kg) yield was 3456 (3815) IEQ/kg. Nine patients had positive islet cultures. Two thromboembolic events and one bacteremia occurred. One perihepatic hematoma occurred after percutaneous portal venous access. The median postoperative length of stay was 14.5 days, and five patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days. All patients were discharged home on insulin. No mortality occurred. CONCLUSIONS Total pancreatectomy with remote islet isolation provides excellent islet yield for autotransplant and satisfactory perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Evan L Fogel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine
| | - Paul M Haste
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pediatric-to-Adult Transfer of Care in Patients With Pancreas Disease: Recommendations for Care and Research Opportunities. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:443-451. [PMID: 35862827 PMCID: PMC10147498 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Young adults who have experienced recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis as children or adolescents are vulnerable to poor follow-up and disease management during the transfer from the pediatric to adult healthcare system. Although formalized transition programs for young adults have been developed and described for other disease conditions, no such program has been described for young adults with pancreatic disease. This document is the first expert opinion outlining the important aspects of a transitional care and transfer program tailored to youth with recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis. We emphasize the unique needs of these patients as they transfer to adult health care and the need for further research. The goal of improved transitional care and transfer is to enhance the services provided to adolescents/young adults with pancreatic disease in both healthcare settings and improve continuity of follow-up care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Messner EM, Sturm N, Terhorst Y, Sander LB, Schultchen D, Portenhauser A, Schmidbaur S, Stach M, Klaus J, Baumeister H, Walter BM. Mobile Apps for the Management of Gastrointestinal Diseases: Systematic Search and Evaluation Within App Stores. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e37497. [PMID: 36197717 PMCID: PMC9582913 DOI: 10.2196/37497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gastrointestinal diseases are associated with substantial cost in health care. In times of the COVID-19 pandemic and further digitalization of gastrointestinal tract health care, mobile health apps could complement routine health care. Many gastrointestinal health care apps are already available in the app stores, but the quality, data protection, and reliability often remain unclear. Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the quality characteristics as well as the privacy and security measures of mobile health apps for the management of gastrointestinal diseases. Methods A web crawler systematically searched for mobile health apps with a focus on gastrointestinal diseases. The identified mobile health apps were evaluated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Furthermore, app characteristics, data protection, and security measures were collected. Classic user star rating was correlated with overall mobile health app quality. Results The overall quality of the mobile health apps (N=109) was moderate (mean 2.90, SD 0.52; on a scale ranging from 1 to 5). The quality of the subscales ranged from low (mean 1.89, SD 0.66) to good (mean 4.08, SD 0.57). The security of data transfer was ensured only by 11 (10.1%) mobile health apps. None of the mobile health apps had an evidence base. The user star rating did not correlate with the MARS overall score or with the individual subdimensions of the MARS (all P>.05). Conclusions Mobile health apps might have a positive impact on diagnosis, therapy, and patient guidance in gastroenterology in the future. We conclude that, to date, data security and proof of efficacy are not yet given in currently available mobile health apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Messner
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Niklas Sturm
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.,Department of Research Methods, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lasse B Sander
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg at Breisgau, Germany
| | - Dana Schultchen
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexandra Portenhauser
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Simone Schmidbaur
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Stach
- Institute of Databases and Information Systems, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jochen Klaus
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Walter
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kindt S, Louis H, De Schepper H, Arts J, Caenepeel P, De Looze D, Gerkens A, Holvoet T, Latour P, Mahler T, Mokaddem F, Nullens S, Piessevaux H, Poortmans P, Rasschaert G, Surmont M, Vafa H, Van Malderen K, Vanuytsel T, Wuestenberghs F, Tack J. Belgian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2022; 85:360-382. [PMID: 35709780 DOI: 10.51821/85.2.10100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterised by recurrent abdominal pain related to defaecation or associated with altered stool frequency or consistency. Despite its prevalence, major uncertainties in the diagnostic and therapeutic management persist in clinical practice. METHODS A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of literature review and voting process on 78 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement. RESULTS Consensus was reached for 50 statements. The Belgian consensus agreed as to the multifactorial aetiology of IBS. According to the consensus abdominal discomfort also represents a cardinal symptom, while bloating and abdominal distension often coexist. IBS needs subtyping based on stool pattern. The importance of a positive diagnosis, relying on history and clinical examination is underlined, while additional testing should remain limited, except when alarm features are present. Explanation of IBS represents a crucial part of patient management. Lifestyle modification, spasmolytics and water-solube fibres are considered first-line agents. The low FODMAP diet, selected probiotics, cognitive behavioural therapy and specific treatments targeting diarrhoea and constipation are considered appropriate. There is a consensus to restrict faecal microbiota transplantation and gluten-free diet, while other treatments are strongly discouraged. CONCLUSIONS A panel of Belgian gastroenterologists summarised the current evidence on the aetiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of IBS with attention for the specificities of the Belgian healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kindt
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - H Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - H De Schepper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J Arts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Brugge, Belgium
| | - P Caenepeel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Campus Sint-Jan, Genk, Belgium
- UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - D De Looze
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - A Gerkens
- Boitsfort Medical Center, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T Holvoet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint Niklaas, Belgium
| | - P Latour
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - T Mahler
- Department of Pediatrics, Universitair Ziekenuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - F Mokaddem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vivalia-Centre Sud Luxembourg, Arlon, Belgium
| | - S Nullens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - H Piessevaux
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - G Rasschaert
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - M Surmont
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - H Vafa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chirec-Site Delta, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Van Malderen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T Vanuytsel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Wuestenberghs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - J Tack
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|