Association Between Levels of Sex Hormones and Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus

Risk Factors for the Development of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the most widely established precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Despite current screening guidelines, more than 90% of EAC patients lack a previous diagnosis of BE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the most important risk factors for the development of BE or EAC.

RECENT FINDINGS

PubMed.gov, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through March 15, 2024. Studies comparing characteristics of patients with endoscopically diagnosed BE or EAC to control groups satisfied our inclusion criteria. Dual extraction provided data for random-effects meta-analyses. Sufficient data were extracted from 54 included studies to perform our meta-analyses. There were five risk factors with significant associations for the development of BE: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux at least once weekly (OR, 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-6.25; p = 0.004) tobacco smoking (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.51; p < 0.001); alcohol use (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71; p = 0.008); male gender (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.57; p < 0.001); and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39; p = 0.003). Tobacco smoking was significantly associated with the diagnosis of EAC (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.85-2.43; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Five risk factors showed significant associations with the development of BE and one with the development of EAC, with over a three-fold increase in BE for patients with gastroesophageal reflux more than once weekly. These data could prove useful in developing diagnostic paradigms with higher emphasis on patients experiencing more frequent acid reflux.

Global esophageal cancer epidemiology in 2022 and predictions for 2050: A comprehensive analysis and projections based on GLOBOCAN data

BACKGROUND

The burden of esophageal cancer varies across different regions of the world. The aim of this study is to analyze the current burden of esophageal cancer in 185 countries in 2022 and to project the trends up to the year 2050.

METHODS

We extracted data on primary esophageal cancer cases and deaths from the GLOBOCAN 2022 database, which includes data from 185 countries. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000 person-years were calculated by stratifying by Human Development Index (HDI) levels and regions. Considering changes in population size and age structure, we assumed that the risks of incidence and mortality remain constant at the levels of 2022 to forecast the number of new cases and deaths from esophageal cancer globally by 2050.

RESULTS

In 2022, an estimated 511,054 people were diagnosed with esophageal cancer globally, and 445,391 died from the disease. The global ASIR and ASMR for esophageal cancer were 5.00 and 4.30 per 100,000, respectively. The highest rates were observed in East Africa (7.60 for incidence, 7.20 for mortality per 100,000), East Asia (7.60 for incidence, 5.90 for mortality per 100,000), Southern Africa (6.30 for incidence, 5.90 for mortality per 100,000), and South Central Asia (5.80 for incidence, 5.50 for mortality per 100,000). Among the 185 countries worldwide, esophageal cancer was among the top five causes of cancer incidence in 18 countries and among the top five causes of cancer mortality in 25 countries. In 2022, China had 224,012 new cases and 187,467 deaths from esophageal cancer, accounting for approximately 43.8% and 42.1% of the global total, respectively, which is higher than the proportion of China's population to the global population (17.9%). ASIR was 8.30 per 100,000, and ASMR was 6.70 per 100,000. The highest burden of esophageal cancer was in high HDI countries, with new cases and deaths accounting for 51.3% and 50.0% of the global total, respectively. The ASIR and ASMR were highest in the high HDI group (6.10 and 5.10 per 100,000, respectively), also exceeding the global averages. There was a trend of decreasing mortality to incidence ratio with increasing HDI, but no correlation was observed between HDI and ASIR or ASMR. In all regions worldwide, the incidence and mortality rates were higher in males than in females (with a male-to-female ASR ratio ranging from 1.10 to 28.7). Compared to 2022, it is projected that by 2050, the number of new esophageal cancer cases will increase by approximately 80.5%, and deaths will increase by 85.4% due to population growth and aging.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of esophageal cancer remains heavy. Adopting a healthy lifestyle, including reducing tobacco and alcohol intake, avoiding moldy foods, and increasing intake of fresh fruits and vegetables, can help reduce the risk of stomach and esophageal cancer. In addition, the development and implementation of evidence-based and effective public health policies are critical to reducing the global disease burden of esophageal cancer.

An atlas on risk factors for gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most frequent cancer types and seriously threaten human life and health. Recent studies attribute the occurrence of gastrointestinal cancers to both genetic and environmental factors, yet the intrinsic etiology remains unclear. Mendelian randomization is a powerful well-established statistical method that is based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) to evaluate the causal relationship between exposures and outcomes. In the present study, we aimed to conduct a systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies investigating any causal risk factors for gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

We systematically searched Mendelian randomization studies that addressed the associations of genetically predicted exposures with five main gastrointestinal cancers from September 2014 to March 2024, as well as testing the research quality and validity.

RESULTS

Our findings suggested robust and consistent causal effects of body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate, fatty acids, total cholesterol, total bilirubin, insulin like growth factor-1, eosinophil counts, interleukin 2, alcohol consumption, coffee consumption, apolipoprotein B on colorectal cancer risks, BMI, waist circumference, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total testosterone, smoking on gastric cancer risks, BMI, fasting insulin, LDL, waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), immune cells, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on pancreatic cancer risks, waist circumference, smoking, T2DM on esophageal adenocarcinoma risks, and VAT, ferritin, transferrin, alcohol consumption, hepatitis B virus infection, rheumatoid arthritis on liver cancer risks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Larger, well-designed Mendelian randomization studies are practical in determining the causal status of risk factors for diseases.

Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: characteristics of female patients and young adult patients based on a 12-year retrospective and prospective multicenter clinicoepidemiological cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) is most common in men and the elderly, but the disease is becoming more common in female and young adult persons. We have investigated the clinicoepidemiological characteristics of female and young adult patients with AEGJ and the 12-year trends in the Kurashiki area for young adult patients with AEGJ.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with AEGJ in 12 hospitals between January 2008 and December 2019 were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups by age (young adult [≤50 years], middle-aged [51 to 70 years], and elderly [>70 years]). Factors associated with AEGJ such as obesity, smoking, hiatal hernia and male, which were reported in our previous study, were identified.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-eight AEGJ patients, including 36 females and 20 young adults, were characterized. There was no significant change in the annual incidence of AEGJ among female (p=0.078) and young adult patients (p=0.89). Female patients without any associated factors, accounting for 53% (19/36) of the female patients and young adult patients, had significantly more histologically undifferentiated cancers than patients with at least one associated factor (58% [11/19] vs. 30% [50/169], p=0.025) and middle-aged and elderly patients (60% [12/20] vs. 30% [25/83] vs. 28% [24/85], p =0.026). Smoking was significantly less common in women than in men (8% [3/36] vs. 57% [87/152], p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between ages in the proportions of these associated factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologically undifferentiated AEGJ cancers were more frequent in female patients without any associated factors and in young adult patients. Factors associated with AEGJ may differ between women and men, but they are similar in young adults and older adults. No increase in young adult patients with AEGJ was observed in the 12-year study.

Causal effects of genetically determined metabolites and metabolite ratios on esophageal diseases: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal diseases (ED) are a kind of common diseases of upper digestive tract. Previous studies have proved that metabolic disorders are closely related to the occurrence and development of ED. However, there is a lack of evidence for causal relationships between metabolites and ED, as well as between metabolite ratios representing enzyme activities and ED. Herein, we explored the causality of genetically determined metabolites (GDMs) on ED through Mendelian Randomization (MR) study.

METHODS

Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was used to assess the causal effects of genetically determined metabolites and metabolite ratios on ED. A genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) encompassing 850 individual metabolites along with 309 metabolite ratios served as the exposures. Meanwhile, the outcomes were defined by 10 types of ED phenotypes, including Congenital Malformations of Esophagus (CME), Esophageal Varices (EV), Esophageal Obstructions (EO), Esophageal Ulcers (EU), Esophageal Perforations (EP), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Esophagitis, Barrett's Esophagus (BE), Benign Esophageal Tumors (BETs), and Malignant Esophageal Neoplasms (MENs). The standard inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was applied to estimate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome. Sensitivity analyses were carried out using multiple methods, including MR-Egger, Weighted Median, MR-PRESSO, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analysis. P < 0.05 was conventionally considered statistically significant. After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, a threshold of P < 4.3E-05 (0.05/1159) was regarded as indicative of a statistically significant causal relationship. Furthermore, metabolic pathway analysis was performed using the web-based MetaboAnalyst 6.0 software.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that initially, a total of 869 candidate causal association pairs ( P ivw < 0.05) were identified, involving 442 metabolites, 145 metabolite ratios and 10 types of ED. However, upon applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, only 36 pairs remained significant, involving 28 metabolites (predominantly lipids and amino acids), 5 metabolite ratios and 6 types of ED. Sensitivity analyses and reverse MR were performed for these 36 causal association pairs, where the results showed that the pair of EV and 1-(1-enyl-palmitoyl)-2-linoleoyl-GPE (p-16:0/18:2) did not withstand the sensitivity tests, and Hexadecenedioate (C16:1-DC) was found to have a reverse causality with GERD. The final 34 robust causal pairs included 26 metabolites, 5 metabolite ratios and 5 types of ED. The involved 26 metabolites predominantly consisted of methylated nucleotides, glycine derivatives, sex hormones, phospholipids, bile acids, fatty acid dicarboxylic acid derivatives, and N-acetylated amino acids. Furthermore, through metabolic pathway analysis, we uncovered 8 significant pathways that played pivotal roles in five types of ED conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study integrated genomics with metabolomics to assess causal relationships between ED and both metabolites and metabolite ratios, uncovering several key metabolic features in ED pathogenesis. These findings have potential as novel biomarkers for ED and provide insights into the disease's etiology and progression. However, further clinical and experimental validations are necessary.

Late age at first birth is a protective factor for oesophageal cancer and gastro-oesophageal reflux: the evidence from the genetic study

Objective

The primary objective of this research endeavor was to examine the underlying genetic causality between the age at first birth (AFB) and four prevalent esophageal diseases, namely oesophageal obstruction (OO), oesophageal varices (OV), gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), and oesophageal cancer (OC).

Methods

We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to examine the causal association between AFB and four prevalent esophageal disorders. We employed eight distinct MR analysis techniques to evaluate causal relationships, encompassing random-effects inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, weighted mode, maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and fixed-effects IVW. The random-effects IVW method served as the primary approach for our analysis. Furthermore, we executed several sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the genetic causal inferences.

Results

The random-effects IVW analysis revealed a significant negative genetic causal association between AFB and both GOR (P < 0.001, Odds Ratio [OR] 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.882 [0.828-0.940]) and OC (P < 0.001, OR 95% CI = 0.998 [0.998-0.999]). Conversely, there was insufficient evidence support to substantiate a genetic causal link between AFB and OO (P = 0.399, OR 95% CI = 0.873 [0.637-1.197]) or OV (P = 0.881, OR 95% CI = 0.978 [0.727-1.314]). The results of sensitivity analyses underscore the robustness and reliability of our MR analysis.

Conclusion

The findings of this investigation substantiate the notion that elevated AFB confers a protective effect against GOR and OC. In addition, no causative association was discerned between AFB and OO or OV at the genetic level.

Susceptibility Genes Associated with Multiple Primary Cancers

With advancements in treatment and screening techniques, we have been witnessing an era where more cancer survivors harbor multiple primary cancers (MPCs), affecting approximately one in six patients. Identifying MPCs is crucial for tumor staging and subsequent treatment choices. However, the current clinicopathological criteria for clinical application are limited and insufficient, making it challenging to differentiate them from recurrences or metastases. The emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has provided a genetic perspective for defining multiple primary cancers. Researchers have found that, when considering multiple tumor pairs, it is crucial not only to examine well-known essential mutations like MLH1/MSH2, EGFR, PTEN, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, and TP53 mutations but also to explore certain pleiotropic loci. Moreover, specific deleterious mutations may serve as regulatory factors in second cancer development following treatment. This review aims to discuss these susceptibility genes and provide an explanation of their functions based on the signaling pathway background. Additionally, the association network between genetic signatures and different tumor pairs will be summarized.

Genetic causal relationship between age at menarche and benign oesophageal neoplasia identified by a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

The occurrence and development of oesophageal neoplasia (ON) is closely related to hormone changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the causal relationships between age at menarche (AAMA) or age at menopause (AAMO) and benign oesophageal neoplasia (BON) or malignant oesophageal neoplasia (MON) from a genetic perspective.

METHODS

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of exposures (AAMA and AAMO) and outcomes (BON and MON) were obtained from the IEU OpenGWAS database. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study between them. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) was used as the main analysis method, while the MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were supplementary methods. The maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and IVW (fixed effects) were validation methods. We used Cochran's Q statistic and Rucker's Q statistic to detect heterogeneity. The intercept test of the MR Egger and global test of MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) were used to detect horizontal pleiotropy, and the distortion test of the MR-PRESSO analysis was used to detect outliers. The leave-one-out analysis was used to detect whether the MR analysis was affected by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In addition, the MR robust adjusted profile score (MR-RAPS) method was used to assess the robustness of MR analysis.

RESULTS

The random-effects IVW results showed that AAMA had a negative genetic causal relationship with BON (odds ratio [OR] = 0.285 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.130-0.623], P = 0.002). The weighted median, maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and IVW (fixed effects) were consistent with random-effects IVW (P < 0.05). The MR Egger, simple mode and weighted mode results showed that AAMA had no genetic causal relationship with BON (P > 0.05). However, there were no causal genetic relationships between AAMA and MON (OR = 1.132 [95%CI: 0.621-2.063], P = 0.685), AAMO and BON (OR = 0.989 [95%CI: 0.755-1.296], P = 0.935), or AAMO and MON (OR = 1.129 [95%CI: 0.938-1.359], P = 0.200). The MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, weighted mode, maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and IVW (fixed effects) were consistent with a random-effects IVW (P > 0.05). MR analysis results showed no heterogeneity, the horizontal pleiotropy and outliers (P > 0.05). They were not driven by a single SNP, and were normally distributed (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Only AAMA has a negative genetic causal relationship with BON, and no genetic causal relationships exist between AAMA and MON, AAMO and BON, or AAMO and MON. However, it cannot be ruled out that they are related at other levels besides genetics.

Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in Development and Use of Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus

BACKGROUND

A histological diagnosis of dysplasia is our current best predictor of progression in Barrett's esophagus (BE), the precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Despite periodic endoscopic surveillance and assessment of dysplastic changes, we fail to identify the majority of those who progress before the development of EAC, whereas the majority of patients undergo endoscopy without showing progression.

SUMMARY

Low-grade dysplasia (LGD), confirmed by expert pathologists, identifies BE patients at higher risk for progression, but the diagnosis of LGD is challenging. Recent research indicates that progression from BE to EAC is heterogeneous and can accelerate via genome doubling and genome catastrophes, resulting in different ways to progression. We identified 3 target areas, which may help to overcome the current lack of an accurate biomarker: (1) the implementation of somatic point mutations, chromosomal alterations, and epigenetic changes (genomics and epigenomics), (2) evaluate and develop biomarkers over space and time, (3) use new sampling methods such as noninvasive self-expandable sponges and endoscopic brushes. This review focus on the state of the art in risk stratifying BE and on recent advances which may overcome the limitations of current strategies.

KEY MESSAGES

A panel of clinical factors, genomics, epigenomics, and/or proteomics will most likely lead to an assay that accurately risk stratifies BE patients into low- or high-risk for progression. This biomarker panel needs to be developed and validated in large cohorts containing a sufficient number of progressors, with testing samples over space (spatial distribution) and time (temporal distribution). For implementation in clinical practice, the technique should be affordable and applicable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, which represent standard of care.

Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to map and describe the current state of Mendelian randomization (MR) literature on cancer risk and to identify associations supported by robust evidence.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Scopus up to 06/10/2020 for MR studies investigating the association of any genetically predicted risk factor with cancer risk. We categorized the reported associations based on a priori designed levels of evidence supporting a causal association into four categories, namely robust, probable, suggestive, and insufficient, based on the significance and concordance of the main MR analysis results and at least one of the MR-Egger, weighed median, MRPRESSO, and multivariable MR analyses. Associations not presenting any of the aforementioned sensitivity analyses were not graded.

RESULTS

We included 190 publications reporting on 4667 MR analyses. Most analyses (3200; 68.6%) were not accompanied by any of the assessed sensitivity analyses. Of the 1467 evaluable analyses, 87 (5.9%) were supported by robust, 275 (18.7%) by probable, and 89 (6.1%) by suggestive evidence. The most prominent robust associations were observed for anthropometric indices with risk of breast, kidney, and endometrial cancers; circulating telomere length with risk of kidney, lung, osteosarcoma, skin, thyroid, and hematological cancers; sex steroid hormones and risk of breast and endometrial cancer; and lipids with risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the large amount of research on genetically predicted risk factors for cancer risk, limited associations are supported by robust evidence for causality. Most associations did not present a MR sensitivity analysis and were thus non-evaluable. Future research should focus on more thorough assessment of sensitivity MR analyses and on more transparent reporting.

Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is characterised by a strong male predominance. We aimed to test the hypothesis that menopausal hormonal therapy decreases the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included all women who used systemic menopausal hormonal therapy (exposed) in Sweden between 2005 and 2018. For each exposed participant, five randomly selected female age-matched non-users of menopausal hormonal therapy (unexposed) were included. Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, smoking-related diagnoses, Helicobacter pylori eradication, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/aspirin, use of statins and hysterectomy.

RESULTS

The study included 296,964 users of menopausal hormonal therapy and 1,484,820 non-users. Ever-users of menopausal hormonal therapy had an overall decreased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.97), which remained unchanged after further adjustment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.97) and obesity/diabetes (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.98). Decreased HRs were indicated both in users of oestrogen only (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60-1.12) and oestrogen combined with progestogen (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-1.00). The risk reduction was more pronounced in users younger than 60 years (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Menopausal hormone therapy in women may decrease the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

The aim of this study was to explore the male predominance in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma by evaluating the preventive potential of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This matched cohort study was based on a national Swedish database of prostate cancer patients in 2006-2013. Prostate cancer patients receiving ADT were the exposed group. Prostate cancer-free men from the general population were randomly selected and matched to the index case by birth year and county of residence, forming the unexposed control group. The participants were followed until a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer, death, emigration, or end of the study period. The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, and esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma among ADT-exposed compared to unexposed was calculated by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted for confounders. There was a risk reduction of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma among ADT-users compared to non-users (HR 0.49 [95% CI 0.24-0.98]). No such decreased risk was found for esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR 1.17 [95% CI 0.60-2.32]), cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.40-2.46]), or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.31-3.13]). This study indicates that androgen deprivation therapy decreases the risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, while no decreased risk was found for esophageal adenocarcinoma, cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, or esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.

Global burden and epidemiology of Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is a global health problem; in 2018 there were more than 572,000 people newly diagnosed with oesophageal cancer worldwide. There are two main histological subtypes of oesophageal cancer, oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and there has been a dramatic shift in its epidemiology. While the incidence of EAC and its precursor lesion, Barrett oesophagus, has increased in Western populations over the past four decades, the incidence of ESCC has declined in most parts of the world over the same period. ESCC still accounts for the vast majority of all oesophageal cancer cases diagnosed worldwide each year. Prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer is strongly related to stage at diagnosis. As most patients are diagnosed with late-stage disease, overall 5-year survival for oesophageal cancer remains <20%. Knowledge of epidemiology and risk factors for oesophageal cancer is essential for public health and clinical decisions about risk stratification, screening and prevention. The goal of this Review is to establish the current epidemiology of oesophageal cancer, with a particular focus on the Western world and the increasing incidence of EAC and Barrett oesophagus.

Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Screening and Surveillance

In the United States, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased markedly since the 1970s with a recent stabilization. Despite evolving screening and surveillance strategies to diagnose, risk triage, and intervene in Barrett's esophagus patients to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma, most cases present with advanced disease and poor resultant survival. Epidemiologic studies have identified the main risk factors for these conditions, including increasing age, male sex, white race, gastroesophageal reflux disease, abdominal obesity, cigarette smoking, and lack of infection with Helicobacter pylori. This review summarizes the current epidemiologic evidence with implications for screening and surveillance in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Prediagnostic circulating levels of sex hormones and survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Sex hormonal differences may contribute to the strong male predominance in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but whether sex hormone levels influence survival in EAC is unstudied. Our study aimed to assess associations between prediagnostic sex hormone levels and survival in EAC. In a population‐based cohort study, 244 male EAC patients from the Janus Serum Bank Cohort in Norway were followed up through 2018. Associations between prediagnostic serum levels of 12 sex hormone measures and disease‐specific mortality were assessed using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, calendar year, body mass index, tobacco smoking, physical activity and surgical resection. Higher levels of sex hormone‐binding globulin (SHBG) indicated decreased disease‐specific mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44‐1.07, highest vs lowest tertile). In stratified analyses by surgery, such associations remained in nonoperated patients (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35‐0.96, highest vs lowest tertile), but not in operated patients. Higher levels of follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) were associated with increased disease‐specific mortality in an exposure‐response pattern; HRs for the middle and highest tertiles vs the lowest tertile were 1.35 (95% CI 0.89‐2.05) and 1.61 (95% CI 1.06‐2.43), respectively. No clear associations were observed with serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, testosterone, 17‐OH‐progesterone, progesterone, estradiol, androstenedione, testosterone:estradiol ratio or free testosterone index. These findings suggest that higher endogenous levels of SHBG and lower levels of FSH may increase the survival in EAC. The other 10 examined sex hormone measures may not influence the survival.

What's new?

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) occurs more frequently in men than women. Whether this pattern is linked to differences in sex hormone levels and whether such differences impact EAC survival remain unclear. In this study of male EAC patients in Norway, analyses of prediagnostic sex hormone measures uncovered associations between reduced disease‐specific mortality and increased sex hormone‐binding globulin and decreased follicle‐stimulating hormone levels. The associations were detected only in patients who had not undergone surgery. Ten other sex hormone measures also analyzed had no influence on survival. Additional investigation is needed to better understand relationships between sex hormone levels and EAC survival.