Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis-Associated Pouchitis: A Distinct Clinical Phenotype

Optimal Approaches to Treating and Preventing Acute and Chronic Pouchitis by Altering Microbial Profiles

Pouchitis is the most common complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. The authors review the role of the microbiota in both the pathogenesis of pouchitis, primarily via dysbiosis, as well as the resultant treatment strategies focused on correcting dysbiosis among patients with pouchitis. These include the role of antibiotics, probiotics, and potentially metabolomics in both treatment and risk stratification.

Impact of histologic disease activity on long-term outcomes in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) can incur in complications. The impact of histological activity on the development of pouch-related complications is poorly studied.

AIM

To assess the association between histology and long-term outcomes in UC-IPAA.

METHODS

Single-center, ambidirectional cohort study including UC-IPAA patients undergoing pouchscopy after ileostomy closure. Histological activity was defined as a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index histology subscore ≥2. The primary outcomes were: (i) development of chronic pouchitis, (ii) need of therapy escalation (azathioprine/biologics), and (iii) a composite outcome of treatment with biologics/azathioprine, pouch-related hospitalization or pouch failure.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included. After pouchoscopy, the median patient follow-up was 2.3 years (IQR, 1.3-4.0). Eighteen patients (17.3 %) developed chronic pouchitis, 20 (19.2 %) initiated biologics/azathioprine, and 25 (24 %) experienced the composite outcome. After adjusting for confounders, histological activity was significantly associated with development of chronic pouchitis (aHR=4.44; 95 % CI, 1.43-13.80; p=0.010), the treatment with biologics/azathioprine (aHR=4.74; 95 % CI, 1.53-14.71; p=0.007), and the composite outcome (aHR=3.94; 95 % CI, 1.53-10.13; p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Histological activity is associated with the development of chronic pouchitis and the need for azathioprine/biologics in UC-IPAA patients, highlighting its potential role in guiding long-term management.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of pouchitis: more than just the microbiota

Pouchitis, defined as inflammation of the ileal pouch, is the most common complication following restorative proctocolectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis. Antibiotics remain the first line of therapy for pouchitis, but the majority of patients develop subsequent episodes and some are refractory to antibiotic therapy. This highlights the need for more effective treatment options and points to a more complex pathophysiology beyond the role of th pouch microbiome, similar to what is seen in inflammatory bowel disease. In this review, we outline the putative mechanisms of pouchitis, including genetic predisposition, microbiome alterations, dysfunction of the intestinal barrier and the immune system and review the available animal models of pouchitis. In addition, we introduce the concept of pouchitis as a possible transmural disease and discuss the potential role of non-immune cells, including stromal cells, in perpetuating inflammation and intestinal barrier dysfunction. We discuss future directions, implications for novel therapies and propose novel multicellular disease models that can better capture the complexity of pouchitis pathogenesis.

Altered Bile Acids and Pouch Microbiota Composition in Patients With Chronic Pouchitis

This article looks at how changes in bile acids and gut bacteria might contribute to chronic pouchitis, a condition that can develop after surgical removal of the colon and creation of a J-pouch for people with inflammatory bowel disease. The goal is to better understand pouchitis and find treatments to improve patients’ health.

Endoscopic assessment of the J pouch in ulcerative colitis: A narrative review

Patients with ulcerative colitis sometimes need a total colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis due to medically refractory disease or colitis-associated neoplasia. Up to 50% of patients with ulcerative colitis postoperatively develop pouchitis and the rate of chronic inflammatory pouch conditions requiring pouch excision or diverting ileostomy is reported to be 10%. In order to diagnose and monitor pouchitis, pouchoscopy is essential to assess endoscopic inflammatory findings of the J pouch and to survey neoplasia development, particularly in the remnant distal rectum. However, endoscopic protocols for the evaluation of the pouch may not be standardized worldwide and the reliability of existing disease activity indices for pouchitis has been questioned due to the lack of validation. Recently, reliable endoscopic scoring systems based on an observation of the anatomical location of the J pouch were reported and a significant association between the distribution pattern of endoscopic inflammation (i.e., endoscopic phenotype) and pouch outcomes was also uncovered. In this review, we discuss how to survey the J pouch using pouchoscopy, endoscopic indices for pouchitis disease activity, endoscopic phenotypes and classification, and the pathological mechanisms of pouchitis phenotype in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Tofacitinib for the treatment of chronic pouchitis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Up to 15% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with an ileo-anal pouch will develop chronic or antibiotic refractory pouchitis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in these refractory patients.

METHODS

In this prospective single center study, adult UC patients with chronic or antibiotic refractory pouchitis (pouchitis disease activity index [PDAI] ≥ 7) were treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and histologic disease activity was assessed at baseline and at week 8. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (PDAI < 7 and a reduction of ≥3 points from baseline) or clinical response (decrease ≥2 points from baseline).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included and treated with tofacitinib. After 8 weeks, 31% achieved PDAI-defined remission (4/13) and 54% achieved response (7/13). Both the total PDAI score (11 [interquartile range 9-12.75] vs. 8 [4.5-9.75], p = 0.033) and the clinical PDAI subscore (4 [3-4] vs. 2 [0.25-3.75], p = 0.014) decreased significantly from baseline compared to week 8 or early withdrawal, respectively. We did not observe a change in endoscopic or histological PDAI subscores.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis was achieved in 31% of patients after 8 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib. Total and clinical PDAI dropped significantly compared with baseline, but we did not observe a significant change in endoscopic or histologic disease activity. Presumably, a treatment duration of 8 weeks is insufficient to induce mucosal healing in these refractory patients.

Assessing the Impact of Interval Duration Between Ileal Pouch Creation and Loop Ileostomy Closure on the Development of Subsequent Inflammatory Pouch Conditions in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Many patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, which typically includes the creation of a temporary loop ileostomy. The impact of the interval between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and loop ileostomy closure regarding endoscopic pouch inflammation has not been well defined. The aim for this project was to assess if delayed loop ileostomy closure increases patients' risk of endoscopic pouch inflammation.

Methods

This is a cohort study of patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between 01/2010 and 12/2020. Patients were divided into groups-early (12-116 days) or late closure (>180 days)-based on interval between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and loop ileostomy closure. The late closure group was further sub-divided by indication for delay which included post-operative complications and non-medical reasons. The primary outcome was development of endoscopic inflammatory pouch disease, which was a composite of pouch disease activity index score of ≥ 4, mucosal breaks beyond anastomotic lines, and diffuse pouch inflammation.

Results

Two-hundred ninety patients were included which comprised early and late cohorts of 217 and 73 patients, respectively. Compared to early closure, late closures for non-medical and pouch-related surgical complications were both not found to be associated with development of our composite outcome (P = .43 and P = .80, respectively).

Conclusions

Delaying ileostomy closure due to patient preference or logistical limitations did not result in an increased risk of endoscopic pouch inflammation, but there appears to be an association of extraintestinal manifestations with endoscopic inflammatory pouch disease, suggesting the need for a vigilant surveillance in these patients.

Management of primary sclerosing cholangitis: Current state-of-the-art

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic liver disease characterized by progressive inflammation and fibrosis of medium-large bile ducts, most commonly in association with inflammatory bowel disease. Most patients have a progressive disease course, alongside a heightened risk of hepatobiliary and colorectal cancer. Medical therapies are lacking, and this, in part, reflects a poor grasp of disease biology. As a result, current management is largely supportive, with liver transplantation an effective life-prolonging intervention when needed, but not one that cures disease. Emerging therapies targeting disease progression, as well as symptoms such as pruritus, continue to be explored. The trial design is increasingly cognizant of the application of thoughtful inclusion criteria, as well as better endpoints aimed at using surrogates of disease that can identify treatment benefits early. This is hoped to facilitate much-needed advances toward developing safe and effective interventions for patients.

Total Proctocolectomy vs Subtotal/total Colectomy for Neoplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) frequently undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for medically refractory disease or colonic dysplasia/neoplasia. Subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis may have improved outcomes but is not well studied. Due to increased risk for colorectal cancer in PSC-IBD, there is hesitancy to perform subtotal colectomy. We aim to describe the frequency of colorectal dysplasia/neoplasia following IPAA vs subtotal colectomy in PSC-IBD patients.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective study from 1972 to 2022 of patients with PSC-IBD who had undergone total proctocolectomy with IPAA or subtotal colectomy. We abstracted demographics, disease characteristics, and endoscopic surveillance data from the EMR.

RESULTS

Of 125 patients (99 IPAA; 26 subtotal), the indication for surgery was rectal sparing medically refractory disease (51% vs 42%), dysplasia (37% vs 30%) and neoplasia (11% vs 26%) in IPAA vs subtotal colectomy patients, respectively. On endoscopic surveillance of IPAA patients, 2 (2%) had low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in the ileal pouch and 2 (2%) had LGD in the rectal cuff after an average of 8.4 years and 12.3 years of follow-up, respectively. One (1%) IPAA patient developed neoplasia of the rectal cuff after 17.8 years of surgical continuity. No subtotal colectomy patients had dysplasia/neoplasia in the residual colon or rectum.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PSC-IBD, there was no dysplasia or neoplasia in those who underwent subtotal colectomy as opposed to the IPAA group. Subtotal colectomy may be considered a viable surgical option in patients with rectal sparing PSC-IBD if adequate endoscopic surveillance is implemented.

The Effectiveness of Oral Vancomycin on Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 70% of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The IBD therapies currently used to treat PSC-IBD patients have side effects and can be costly. Oral vancomycin (OV)-a safe, economical, and convenient therapy-has been reported to be a salvage therapy in refractory PSC-IBD patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the effectiveness and safety of OV to treat IBD in PSC patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and CINAHL was performed until March 2024. The Murad scale, Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool were used to determine the quality of the case reports and case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trial (RCT), respectively. The outcomes sought were response or remission across clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 1725 published studies, we identified 9 case reports, 7 case series, 3 cohort studies, and 1 RCT. Most studies reported an improvement in clinical IBD symptoms such as diarrhea and hematochezia. Fewer publications provided supporting objective data in the form of fecal calprotectin, endoscopic Mayo scores, and histology. There were no reports of vancomycin-resistant enterococci infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral vancomycin appears safe and effective to treat IBD in a subset of PSC patients. Future studies would benefit from prospective data collection incorporating standardized symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic indices. Ultimately, a well-powered RCT is needed to better assess the effectiveness, safety, and durability of OV therapy.

Altered Bile Acid and Pouch Microbiota Composition in Patients With Chronic Pouchitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis and total abdominal proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have a 50% risk of pouchitis and a 5% to 10% risk of chronic pouchitis.

AIMS

The goal of the study was to compare pouch microbiota and stool bile acid composition in patients with chronic pouchitis, chronic pouchitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, and normal pouch.

METHODS

Patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were recruited from March 20, 2014, to August 6, 2019, and categorized into normal pouch, chronic pouchitis, and chronic pouchitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis groups. Stool samples were subjected to bile acid quantification and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Statistical comparisons of absolute bile acid abundance and pouch microbiota α-diversity, β-diversity, and taxa abundance were performed among the patient groups.

RESULTS

A total of 51 samples were analyzed. Both α-diversity (P = .01, species richness) and β-diversity (P = .001) significantly differed among groups. Lithocholic acid was significantly lower in patients with chronic pouchitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis than in those with chronic pouchitis (P = .01) or normal pouch (P = .03). Decreased α-diversity was associated with an increased primary to secondary bile acid ratio (P = .002), which was also associated with changes in β-diversity (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch microbiota α- and β-diversity differed among patients with normal pouch, chronic pouchitis, and chronic pouchitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lithocholic acid level and primary to secondary bile acid ratio were highly associated with pouch microbiota richness, structure, and composition. These findings emphasize the associations between pouch microbiota and bile acid composition in dysbiosis and altered metabolism, suggesting that secondary bile acids are decreased in chronic pouchitis.

Pouchitis: pathophysiology and management

Pouchitis is an acute or chronic inflammatory disease of the ileal reservoir. It is common after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis has proven challenging. Most cases of acute pouchitis evolve into chronic pouchitis. The aetiology of acute pouchitis is likely to be partly related to the gut microbiota, whereas the pathophysiology of chronic pouchitis involves abnormal interactions between genetic disposition, faecal stasis, the gut microbiota, dysregulated host immunity, surgical techniques, ischaemia and mesentery-related factors. Pouchoscopy with biopsy is the most valuable modality for diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, dysplasia surveillance and delivery of endoscopic therapy. Triggering or risk factors, such as Clostridioides difficile infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, should be modified or eradicated. In terms of treatment, acute pouchitis usually responds to oral antibiotics, whereas chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis often requires induction and maintenance therapy with integrin, interleukin or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Chronic pouchitis with ischaemic features, fistulae or abscesses can be treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

Diagnosis and Medical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Idiopathic Pouchitis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Despite the decreased rates in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) colectomies due to high advances in therapeutic options, a significant number of patients still require proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPPA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Pouchitis is the most common complication in these patients, where up to 60% develop one episode of pouchitis in the first two years after UC surgery with IPAA with severe negative impact on their quality of life. Acute cases usually respond well to antibiotics, but 15% of patients will still develop a refractory disease that requires the initiation of advanced immunosuppressive therapies. For chronic idiopathic pouchitis, current recommendations suggest using the same therapeutic options as for IBD in terms of biologics and small molecules. However, the available data are limited regarding the effectiveness of different biologics or small molecules for the management of this condition, and all evidences arise from case series and small studies. Vedolizumab is the only biologic agent that has received approval for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active chronic refractory pouchitis. Despite the fact that IBD treatment is rapidly evolving with the development of novel molecules, the presence of pouchitis represents an exclusion criterion in these trials. Recommendations for the approach of these conditions range from low to very low certainty of evidence, resulting from small randomized controlled trials and case series studies. The current review focuses on the therapeutic management of idiopathic pouchitis.

A specific phenotype of pouchitis was associated with worst prognosis in patients with ulcerative colitis according to Chicago classification

BACKGROUND

The impact of different pouch phenotypes on long-term functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) remains unclear. Our aim is to investigate the association between endoscopic pouchitis phenotypes and patients' long-term prognosis by assessing pouch function and QoL.

METHODS

Pouchitis was classified into distinct phenotypes according to the Chicago Classification. Pouch function was assessed using the Pouch Functional Score (PFS), and QoL was evaluated using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) score.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were enrolled in the study, with 78 patients diagnosed with pouchitis. According to the Chicago classification, 42 of these pouchitis patients exhibited an endoscopic phenotype characterized by a combination of diffuse inflammation of the pouch body, inlet involvement, and cuffitis, referred to as the Diffuse-Inlet-Cuffitis phenotype. Patients with pouchitis of the Diffuse-Inlet-Cuffitis phenotype showed significantly higher PFS (11.5 vs 5.5, p = 0.013) and lower CGQL scores (0.67 vs 0.7, p = 0.029) compared to those with other pouch phenotypes. Independent risk factors for this severe phenotype were identified as preoperative disease duration (OR = 1.062, 95% CI: 1.006-1.122, p = 0.030) and disease extent E3 (OR = 2.836, 95% CI: 1.052-7.644, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that pouchitis with the Diffuse-Inlet-Cuffitis endoscopic phenotype is common and seriously impairs the long-term prognosis in patients with UC after IPAA. The finding will be beneficial to the stratified management of patients with pouchitis.

Endoscopic Evaluation of the Ileal Pouch

BACKGROUND

Structural and inflammatory adverse sequelae are common after restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA. On rare occasions, neoplasia can occur in patients with ileal pouches. Pouchoscopy plays a key role in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, surveillance, and delivery of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was performed, and principles and techniques of pouchoscopy were described.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant articles on endoscopy in ileal pouches published between January 2000 and May 2023 were included based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

INTERVENTION

Diagnostic, surveillance, and therapeutic endoscopy in ileal pouch disorders were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accurate characterization of the ileal pouch in healthy or diseased states.

RESULTS

The main anatomic structures of a J- or S-pouch are the stoma closure site, prepouch ileum, inlet, tip of the "J," pouch body, anastomosis, cuff, and anal transition zone. Each anatomic location can be prone to the development of structural, inflammatory, or neoplastic disorders. For example, ulcers and strictures are common at the stoma closure site, inlet, and anastomosis. Leaks are commonly detected at the tip of the "J" and anastomosis. Characterization of the anastomotic distribution of inflammation is critical for the differential diagnosis of subtypes of pouchitis and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch. Neoplastic lesions, albeit rare, mainly occur at the cuff, anal transition zone, or anastomosis.

LIMITATIONS

This is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of mainly case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Most structural, inflammatory, and neoplastic disorders can be reliably diagnosed with a careful pouchoscopy. The endoscopist and other clinicians taking care of pouch patients should be familiar with the anatomy of the ileal pouch and be able to recognize common abnormalities. See video from symposium.

Normal Ileal Mucus Is Inadequate for Epithelial Protection in Ileal Pouch Mucosa

BACKGROUND

Clinical, nonspecific pouchitis is common after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, but its cause is unknown. A possible lack of protection for the ileal mucosa in its role as a reservoir for colonic-type bacteria may be the missing piece in defining the causes of pouchitis.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to review the causes of pouchitis and introduce the hypothesis that inadequate mucus protection in the pouch, combined with a predisposition to abnormal inflammation, is the most common cause of nonspecific pouchitis.

DATA SOURCES

Review of PubMed and MEDLINE for articles discussing pouchitis and intestinal mucus.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies published from 1960 to 2023. The main search terms were "pouchitis," and "intestinal mucus," whereas Boolean operators were used with multiple other terms to refine the search. Duplicates and case reports were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Current theories about the cause of pouchitis, descriptions of the role of mucus in the physiology of intestinal protection, and evidence of the effects of lack of mucus on mucosal inflammation.

RESULTS

The crossreference of "intestinal mucus" with "pouchitis" produced 9 references, none of which discussed the role of mucus in the development of pouchitis. Crossing "intestinal mucus" with "pouch" resulted in 32 articles, combining "pouchitis" with "barrier function" yielded 37 articles, and "pouchitis" with "permeability" yielded only 8 articles. No article discussed the mucus coat as a barrier to bacterial invasion of the epithelium or mentioned inadequate mucus as a factor in pouchitis. However, an ileal pouch produces a colonic environment in the small bowel, and the ileum lacks the mucus protection needed for this sort of environment. This predisposes pouch mucosa to bacterial invasion and chronic microscopic inflammation that may promote clinical pouchitis in patients prone to an autoimmune response.

LIMITATIONS

No prior studies address inadequate mucus protection and the origin of proctitis. There is no objective way of measuring the autoimmune tendency in patients with ulcerative colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of intestinal mucus in the ileal pouch and its association with pouchitis are warranted.

Inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: One disease or two?

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was declared one of the biggest unmet needs in hepatology during International Liver Congress 2016 in Berlin. Since then, not much has changed unfortunately, largely due to the still elusive pathophysiology of the disease. One of the most striking features of PSC is its association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with the majority of patients with PSC being diagnosed with extensive colitis. This review describes the epidemiology of IBD in PSC, its specific phenotype, complications and potential pathophysiological mechanisms connecting the two diseases. Whether PSC is merely an extra-intestinal manifestation of IBD or if PSC and IBD are two distinct diseases that happen to share a common susceptibility that leads to a dual phenotype is debated. Implications for the management of the two diseases together are also discussed. Overall, this review summarises the available data in PSC-IBD and discusses whether PSC and IBD are one or two disease(s).

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Acute Pouchitis

BACKGROUND

Pouchitis occurs in up to 80% of patients after total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and has been associated with microbial and host-related immunological factors. We hypothesized that a more robust immune response at the time of colectomy, manifested by acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), may be associated with subsequent acute pouchitis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with UC or indeterminate colitis complicated by medically refractory disease or dysplasia who underwent TPC with IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital between 2008 and 2017 and at least 1 subsequent pouchoscopy. Acute pouchitis was defined according to the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Cox regression was used to assess unadjusted relationships between hypothesized risk factors and acute pouchitis.

RESULTS

A total of 416 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 165 (39.7%) patients who underwent urgent colectomy, 77 (46.7%) were admitted with ASUC. Acute pouchitis occurred in 228 (54.8%) patients a median of 1.3 (interquartile range, 0.6-3.1) years after the final surgical stage. On multivariable analysis, ASUC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.17) and a greater number of biologics precolectomy (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31) were associated with an increased probability of acute pouchitis, while older age at colectomy (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) was associated with a decreased probability. Time to pouchitis was significantly less in patients admitted with ASUC compared with those not (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

A severe UC disease phenotype at the time of colectomy was associated with an increased probability of acute pouchitis.

Classification and Management of Disorders of the J Pouch

Total abdominal proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with substantial complications despite the benefits of managing refractory and/or neoplasia-associated disease. For the purpose of this review, we focused on the diagnosis of some of the most common inflammatory and structural pouch disorders and their respective management. Pouchitis is the most common complication, and it is typically responsive to antibiotics. However, chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP) has been increasingly recognized, and biologic therapies have emerged as the mainstay of therapy. Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) can affect up to 10% of patients with UC after IPAA. Medical options are similar to CARP therapies, including biologics with immunomodulators. Studies have shown higher efficacy rates of biologics for CLDP when compared with those for CARP. In addition, managing stricturing and fistulizing CLDP is challenging and often requires interventional endoscopy (balloon dilation and/or stricturotomy) and/or surgery. The implementation of standardized diagnostic criteria for inflammatory pouch disorders will help in advancing future therapeutic options. Structural pouch disorders are commonly related to surgical complications after IPAA. We focused on the diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks, strictures, and floppy pouch complex. Anastomotic leaks and anastomotic strictures occur in approximately 15% and 11% of patients with UC after IPAA, respectively. Further complications from pouch leaks include the development of sinuses, fistulas, and pouch sepsis requiring excision. Novel endoscopic interventions and less invasive surgical procedures have emerged as options for the management of these disorders.

Colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis is not associated to future diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) is a hepatobiliary disease closely related to ulcerative colitis (UC). In PSC patients, colectomy has been linked to improved prognosis, especially following liver transplantation. This suggests an involvement of the gut-liver axis in PSC etiology.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association between colectomy and the risk of future PSC in an epidemiological setting.

METHOD

Through nationwide registers, we identified all adults diagnosed with UC in Sweden 1990-2018 and retrieved information on PSC diagnosis and colectomy. Within the UC cohort (n = 61,993 patients), we matched 5577 patients with colectomy to 15,078 without colectomy. Matching criteria were sex, age at UC onset (±5 years), year of UC onset (±3 years), and proctitis at the time of colectomy. Incidence rates of PSC per 1000-person year were calculated, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for PSC until 31 December 2019.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 190 (3.4%) colectomized UC patients and 450 (3.0%) UC comparators developed PSC, yielding incidence rates of 2.6 and 2.4 per 1000 person-years (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.90-1.28]). The cumulative incidence of colectomy decreased remarkably over calendar periods, but the cumulative incidence of PSC remained unchanged. The risk of developing PSC in colectomized versus comparators changed over time (HR 0.68 [95% CI; 0.48-0.96] in 1990-97 and HR 2.10 [95% CI; 1.37-3.24] in 2011-18).

CONCLUSIONS

In UC patients, colectomy was not associated with a decreased risk of subsequent PSC. The observed differences in the risk of PSC development over calendar periods are likely due to changes in PSC-diagnosis and UC-treatment.

Histopathology of Colectomy Specimens Predicts Endoscopic Pouch Phenotype in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic appearance in patients with "pouchitis" after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be quite heterogenous. Patients with an endoscopic phenotype resembling Crohn's disease (CD) are at high risk of pouch loss.

AIMS

We aimed to assess how the histopathology of colectomy specimens predicts endoscopic pouch phenotypes in UC.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed pouchoscopies from patients with UC who underwent IPAA and classified pouch findings into 7 main phenotypes: (1) normal, (2) afferent limb involvement, (3) inlet involvement, (4) diffuse, (5) focal inflammation of the pouch body, (6) cuffitis, and (7) pouch with fistulas noted ≥ 6 months from ileostomy takedown. We assessed the clinical and pathological data including deep, focal inflammation, granulomas, and terminal ileal involvement in the colectomy specimens. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify contributing factors to each phenotype.

RESULTS

This study included 1,203 pouchoscopies from 382 patients with UC. On multivariable analysis, deep inflammation was significantly associated with pouch fistulas (Odds ratio 3.27; 95% confidence interval 1.65-6.47; P = 0.0007). Of the 75 patients with deep inflammation, only two patients (2.7%) were diagnosed with CD based on pathology review. Terminal ileal involvement significantly increased the risk of afferent limb involvement (Odds ratio 2.96; 95% confidence interval 1.04-8.47; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between other microscopic features and phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

We identify histologic features of colectomy specimens in UC that predict subsequent pouch phenotypes. Particularly, deep inflammation in the resected colon was significantly associated with pouch fistulas, a pouch phenotype with poor prognosis.

Treatment of pouchitis, Crohn's disease, cuffitis, and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium

Pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, polyps, and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are common inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Acute pouchitis is treated with oral antibiotics and chronic pouchitis often requires anti-inflammatory therapy, including the use of biologics. Aetiological factors for secondary pouchitis should be evaluated and managed accordingly. Crohn's disease of the pouch is usually treated with biologics and its stricturing and fistulising complications can be treated with endoscopy or surgery. The underlying cause of cuffitis determines treatment strategies. Endoscopic polypectomy is recommended for large, symptomatic inflammatory polyps and polyps in the cuff. The management principles of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with pouches are similar to those in patients without pouches.