Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Testing in Unselected Patients With Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Analysis of germline-somatic mutational connections in colorectal cancer reveals differential tumorigenic patterns and a novel predictive marker for germline mutation carriers

Colorectal cancer (CRC) genetic testing of regions beyond clinical guidelines has revealed a substantial number of likely pathogenic germline mutations (GMs). It remains largely undetermined whether and how these GMs, typically located in non-mismatch repair (non-MMR) genes, are associated with the tumorigenesis of CRC. This study aimed to identify CRC-predisposing GMs among 93 cancer susceptibility genes and investigate their potential influences on CRC somatic mutational features. We secondarily aimed to investigate whether somatic ERBB2 amplification contributes to identifying GM carriers. This study incorporated a total of 3,240 Chinese CRC patients and 10,588 control individuals. CRC patients were subjected to paired tumor-normal sequencing with a 1,021-gene panel. A case-control analysis was conducted to profile the GM-associated CRC risk. A comprehensive germline-somatic association analysis was performed among 2,405 patients, with key findings subsequently validated in an independent 835-patient cohort and the TCGA CRC cohort. The case-control results supported CRC-predisposing effects of GMs in certain homologous recombination repair (HRR) and DNA damage checkpoint factor (CPF) genes, such as BRCA1/2, RecQ helicase genes, ATM, and CHEK2. HRR GMs were associated with an increased copy number alteration burden, more TP53 clonal mutations, and a higher probability of carrying somatic ERBB2 amplification. CPF GMs were inferred to have synergistic effects with ARID1A and KDM6A somatic mutations in CRC tumorigenesis. Among patients with onset age ≥55 years, stable microsatellites, and no cancer family history, ERBB2 amplification was significantly predictive of GM carriers. Our findings elucidate different germline tumorigenic patterns not driven by deficient MMR. Somatic ERBB2 amplification in CRC can serve as an indicator for germline genetic testing when traditional risk features are absent.

The prognostic and predictive value of homologous recombination deficiency in gastrointestinal cancer

The homologous recombination (HR) system repairs DNA double-strand breaks produced by the DNA damage response, which is a complex signaling pathway consisting of the key proteins BRCA1/2 and other DNA repair proteins, such as the ATM, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51, and Fanconi anemia proteins. Mutations and epigenetic alterations in HR-related genes may lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), resulting in genomic instability and contributing to the development of certain solid tumors. The biological significance and molecular mechanism of BRCA1/2 mutation-related HRD are well understood, but the relationships of other HR-related genes and their variant forms with HRD have not been sufficiently studied. These genes exhibit multiple forms of variation, including one or more HR genes, germline or somatic mutations, monoallelic or biallelic variants, and not all variants present HRD. Therefore, HRD is usually defined as HR-related gene variation, but recent studies have shown that defining it as the combined score of loss of heterozygosity, LST and TAI, known as the HRD score, can more accurately assess genomic instability. In patients with HRD, platinum-based therapy and poly ADP-ribose polymerase enzyme inhibitor (PARPi) have been shown to perform well in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancers. For gastrointestinal cancer (GI cancer), HRD has been relatively well studied in pancreatic cancer, but its role in other cancers has rarely been reported. Herein, we review the pathogenesis and predictive value of HRD, including the use of platinum drugs, PARPi, and immunotherapy, in digestive system tumors.

Germline variants in patients from the Iranian hereditary colorectal cancer registry

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hereditary cancer syndromes account for 6-10% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 20% of early-onset CRC. Identifying novel pathogenic germline variants can impact genetic testing, counseling, and surveillance. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of germline variants associated with hereditary CRC in the Iranian population.

METHODS

Whole exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on DNA from 101 patients in the Iranian Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry (IHCCR). The cohort included 63 high-risk Lynch Syndrome (LS) patients and 38 colorectal polyposis patients. Germline variants and phenotype spectrum were assessed. Relatives of individuals with the mutations received counseling and cascade testing. Gene ontology and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analyses were conducted to elucidate gene roles on protein function.

RESULTS

Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were identified in Lynch-related genes in 36.51% of patients. P/LP variants in non-Lynch genes (ATM, FH (mono-allelic), MSH3, PMS1, and TP53) were identified in 26.98% of patients. Among polyposis patients, 50% had P/LP variants in the APC gene, and 15.79% had P/LP variants in the MUTYH gene. Additionally, 7.89% carried P/LP variants in non-FAP/MAP genes (BLM, BRCA2, and PTEN). MLH1 variants were most common in exons 10 and 18, MSH2 in exon 12, and APC gene in exon 16. Cascade testing identified 50% of the tested relatives (40/80). Topology analysis of the protein-protein interaction networks in high-risk LS cases highlighted stronger connections among nodes for genes such as TP53, ATM, POLD1, CDH1, MUTYH, WRN, NOTCH1, SMAD4, ERCC4, ERCC1, and MSH3. These genes were associated with high penetrance in CRC. The protein-protein interaction analyses of polyposis patients indicated that genes like POLE, MSH6, MSH2, BRCA2, BRCA1, MLH1, TOPBP1, BLM, RAD50, MUTYH, MSH3, MLH3, PTEN, BRIP1, and POLK had a higher degree value and were also associated with high penetrance. Gene ontology and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis showed that some of the top-scoring non-Lynch genes were TP53, ATM, POLD1, CDH1, MUTYH, WRN, NOTCH1, SMAD4, ERCC4, ERCC1, and MSH3.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified crucial germline variants for hereditary polyposis and non-polyposis CRC pathogenesis in the Iranian population. A selective strategy and cascade genetic testing are recommended for the diagnosis of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.

Incidental germline findings during comprehensive genomic profiling of pancreatic and colorectal cancer: single-centre, molecular tumour board experience

Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTB) are already well established in many comprehensive cancer centers and play an important role in the individual treatment planning for cancer patients. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue based on next-generation sequencing is currently performed for diagnostic and mainly predictive testing. If somatic genomic variants are identified, which are suspected to be pathogenic germline variants (PGVs), MTB propose genetic counseling and germline DNA testing. Commonly used comprehensive genomic profiling approaches of tumor tissue do not include a matched germline DNA control. Therefore, the detection of PGVs could be only predicted based on the content of tumor cells (CTC) in selected tumor area (%) and variant allele frequency score (%). For conclusion, the role of a medical geneticist is essential in these cases. The overall prevalence of PGVs in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) is approximately 10%. In this single-center study, we present 37 patients with PDAC and 48 patients with CRC who were presented at MTB and tested using the large combined DNA/RNA sequencing panel. Content of tumor cells and variant allele frequency scores were evaluated in all tested patients. In case of suspicion of PGV and no previous genetic testing based on the standard guidelines, genetic counseling was recommended regardless of age, sex, and family history. In the PDAC subgroup, five patients were recommended by MTB for genetic counseling based on suspicious genetic findings. Based on a medical geneticist's decision, germline DNA sequencing was performed in four of these cases, and all of them tested positive for PGV in the following genes: ATM, ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2. In the CRC subgroup, no PGV was confirmed in the two patients genetically tested based on the MTB recommendations. Furthermore, we present data from our center's registry of patients with PDAC and CRC who underwent genetic counseling and germline DNA testing based on the standard screening criteria. Our data confirm that comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue can identify patients with hereditary forms of PDAC, who could remain unidentified by standard screening for hereditary forms of cancer.

Genomic Landscapes of Early-Onset Versus Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer Populations

BACKGROUND

Rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC), defined as disease diagnosed at <50 years of age, are increasing. The incidence and spectrum of somatic and pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in this population are not well understood.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study leveraged Tempus' clinicogenomic database, including de-identified records of patients diagnosed with CRC between 2000-2022, to analyze and compare eoCRC and average-onset colorectal cancer (aoCRC, disease diagnosed ≥50 years of age) patients. The frequency and spectrum of somatic mutations and PGVs in patients with eoCRC and aoCRC were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Among 11,006 participants in this study, 57% were male, 76% were white, and 80% had stage 4 disease. Within the total cohort, 2379 had eoCRC and 8627 had aoCRC. Among patients with eoCRC, 4.2% had a tumor with high microsatellite instability and/or deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) and 6.8% with aoCRC had an MSI-H/dMMR tumor (p < 0.001). The most frequent somatic mutations involved TP53, APC, and KRAS, with the most significant difference in BRAF, which was more frequently mutated in aoCRC (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001). In total, 1413 (59.4%) eoCRC and 4898 (56.8%) aoCRC patients had matched normal specimen (blood or saliva) sequencing and a PGV was identified in 6.9% of eoCRC and 5.0% of aoCRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic and germline mutation profiles were similar for eoCRC and aoCRC patients and may not adequately explain differences in tumor behavior and age of disease onset.

Causative Genes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)-Related Breast Cancer and Specific Strategies at Present

Recently, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers. Molecular-based approaches for hereditary cancers in the clinical setting have been reviewed. In particular, the efficacy of the PARP inhibitor has been considered by several clinical trials for various kinds of hereditary cancers. This indicates that the PARP inhibitor can be effective for any kind of BRCA mutated cancers, regardless of the organ-specific cancer. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers, indicating the necessity to confirm the status of HRD-related genes. ARID1A, ATM, ATRX, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C and CHEK2 are known as HRD-related genes for which simultaneous examination as part of panel testing is more suitable. Both surgical and medical oncologists should learn the basis of genetics including HRD. An understanding of the basic mechanism of homologous repair recombination (HRR) in BRCA-related breast cancer is mandatory for all surgical or medical oncologists because PARP inhibitors may be effective for these cancers and a specific strategy of screening for non-cancers exists. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database in the future, or, in other words, on real-world data. Firstly, HRD-related genes should be examined when the hereditary nature of a cancer is placed in doubt after an examination of the relevant family history. Alternatively, HRD score examination is a solution by which to identify HRD-related genes at the first step. If lifetime risk is estimated at over 20%, an annual breast MRI is necessary for high-risk screening. However, there are limited data to show its benefit compared with BRCA. Therefore, a large-scale database, including clinical information and a long-term follow-up should be established, after which a periodical assessment is mandatory. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database, or, in other words, real-world data.

Developing and Assessing a Scalable Digital Health Tool for Pretest Genetic Education in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Mixed Methods Design

BACKGROUND

National guidelines recommend germline genetic testing (GT) for all patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. With recent advances in targeted therapies and GT, these guidelines are expected to expand to include broader groups of patients with colorectal cancer. However, there is a shortage of genetic professionals to provide the necessary education and support for informed consent. As such, there is a pressing need to identify alternative approaches to facilitate and expedite access to GT.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the development of a pretest education intervention, Nest-CRC, to facilitate the uptake of germline GT among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer and health care providers reviewed Nest-CRC, and their reactions and recommendations were captured using a nested mixed methods approach.

METHODS

Using the learner verification approach, we conducted 2 sequential phases of surveys and interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking patients with early-onset colorectal cancer and health care providers. The surveys assessed participants' experiences with genetic services and provided immediate feedback on the Nest-CRC genetic education modules. Semistructured interviews evaluated participants' perceptions of self-efficacy, attraction, comprehension, cultural acceptability, and usability of Nest-CRC. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, median, and proportions), while interview data were analyzed through line-by-line coding of the transcribed interviews. After each phase, Nest-CRC was refined based on participants' recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 52 participants, including 39 patients with early-onset colorectal cancer and 13 providers, participated in the study. Of these, 19 patients and 6 providers participated in phase 1 (N=25), and 20 patients and 7 providers participated in phase 2 (N=27). Most participants (phase 1: 23/25, 92%, to 25/25, 100%; phase 2: 24/27, 89%, to 27/27, 100%) agreed that each of the 5 education modules was easy to understand and helpful; 13 patients reported no history of GT, with 11 (85%) expressing interest in GT and 2 (15%) remaining unsure after completing Nest-CRC. Participants reported that Nest-CRC provided sufficient information to help them decide about GT. The tool was deemed acceptable by individuals from diverse backgrounds, and participants found it visually attractive, easy to comprehend, and user-friendly.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed that Nest-CRC is a promising strategy for facilitating pretest education and promoting GT. Nest-CRC has been refined based on participant recommendations and will be re-evaluated.

Variant of Uncertain Significance Patterns among Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

SIGNIFICANCE

Among individuals with early-onset colorectal cancer, germline VUS reclassification as well as rates of VUSs in cancer susceptibility genes differed by self-identified race/ethnicity. These findings point to the importance of VUS reclassification as this may alter clinical management and to distinct germline variant spectra among diverse patients with early-onset colorectal cancer.

Commentary: Why is genetic testing underutilized worldwide? The case for hereditary breast cancer

It is thirty years since the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were discovered and genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 was introduced. Despite increasing awareness of the genetic basis of cancer and our evolving knowledge of effective means of prevention, screening, and treatment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers, genetic testing is underutilized, and most mutation carriers remain unidentified. In this commentary, we explore possible reasons for why this might be so. Our focus is on factors that may influence or deter a patient from pursuing testing, rather than discussing the implications of receiving a positive test result. Issues of concern include an inadequate number of genetic counselors, restrictive (and conflicting) eligibility criteria for testing, the cost of the test, health insurance coverage, fear of future insurance discrimination, privacy issues, lack of familiarity with the testing process in primary care and gaps in both patient and provider knowledge about the impact and the value of testing. We discuss how these factors may lead to the underutilization of genetic testing in North America and throughout the world and discuss alternative models of genetic healthcare delivery. We have invited leaders in cancer genetic from around the world to tell us what they think are the barriers to testing in their host countries.

Implementation of a dedicated cascade testing clinic for patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes

Cascade testing, the site-specific genetic testing of relatives within families with an inherited condition, is underutilized. Long wait times for appointments in specialty genetics clinics are a known barrier to genetic testing access. In our cancer genetics, New Patient Clinic (NPC), the long wait time for an appointment (on average 5 months for routine referrals), was identified by both providers and patients as a barrier to uptake of cascade testing. Timely testing of at-risk relatives is essential to maximize the benefits of cascade testing and reduce cancer morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to improve access via implementation of a different clinical model that designated appointments for patients seeking cascade testing. A secondary goal was to improve use of genetic counselor time. We implemented a dedicated Cascade Testing Clinic (CTC) with an expedited triaging and unique scheduling model to decrease patient wait time to appointment and optimize clinician time. We report on the process and outcomes here. Between October 2016 and February 2020, the average wait time between referral date and first scheduled appointment date was 46 days for the CTC compared to 144 days for the NPC (p < 0.0001). No-show/cancelation/rescheduling rate was 11.7% in the CTC compared to 29.7% in the NPC (p < 0.0001). Genetic counselors saw approximately twice as many patients per half-day clinic in the CTC compared to the NPC (p < 0.00001). Modifications to clinic staffing and appointment times were made based on provider feedback. Implementation of a dedicated clinic specifically for patients seeking cascade testing significantly shortened wait times for this population, reduced patient drop-off, and improved clinician efficiency. The relatively straightforward indications and generally uncomplicated medical histories made this an ideal population for expedited appointments.

Poor compliance with germline testing recommendations in colorectal cancer patients undergoing molecular residual disease testing

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are associated with germline mutations. There is increasing adoption of DNA-based assays for molecular residual disease (MRD) and growing evidence supporting its clinical utility, particularly for CRC by oncologists in the U.S. We assessed the uptake of germline multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) for hereditary cancer in CRC patients receiving MRD analyses in community oncology settings.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 80 patients receiving care for CRC through community oncology practices who were referred for MRD testing at a commercial laboratory (January-March 2022). Clinical data, including test requisition forms, pathology reports, and clinical notes were reviewed. Documentation of tumor microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemical (IHC) testing for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, age of CRC diagnosis, family history of cancer, and any order or recommendation for MGPT were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 5/80 (6.3%) patients in the study have documented germline MGPT; 65/80 (81.3%) patients have documented MMR testing of their colorectal tumor. Among the 5 cases with abnormal MMR IHC, 2 have MGPT. Of the 33 patients meeting the 2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic/familial high-risk assessment, only 2 have MGPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data suggest that many CRC patients receiving MRD testing and meeting NCCN (v. 2021) criteria for germline MGPT may not be receiving evaluation beyond routine MMR status. Process and educational improvements are needed in community health settings to increase access and uptake of germline testing among CRC patients regardless of age at diagnosis or MMR status.

Universal screening of colorectal tumors for lynch syndrome: a survey of patient experiences and opinions

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome represents the most common hereditary cause of both colorectal and endometrial cancer. It is caused by defects in mismatch repair genes, as well as EPCAM. Universal screening of colon tumors for Lynch syndrome via microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) can identify patients and families at risk to develop further cancers and potentially impact surveillance and treatment options. The approach to implementation of universal screening, taking ethical considerations into account, is critical to its effectiveness, with patient perspectives providing valuable insight.

METHODS

Patients whose colon tumors underwent universal screening at Penn State Hershey Medical Center over a period of 2.5 years were mailed a survey on universal screening in 2017. Along with the survey, they received a recruitment letter and a summary explanation of research. The survey included both multiple choice and free-response questions that covered topics including respondent knowledge of Lynch syndrome, attitudes toward universal screening and experiences with the screening protocol as implemented.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 297 possible patients (22.2%) responded to the survey, including 13 whose screening results raised concern for Lynch syndrome. 75.8% of respondents supported universal tumor screening without informed consent. 92.4% preferred receiving screening results regardless of outcome. Respondents described benefits to screening for themselves and their families.

CONCLUSIONS

While broadly supporting universal tumor screening without informed consent, respondents also wanted more information shared about the screening policy, as well as their results. These patient preferences should be one of many factors considered when implementing universal screening and can also inform practices regarding both tumor profiling and universal genetic testing, which is becoming more prevalent.

Low Rates of Colorectal Cancer Screening in First-Degree Relatives of Our Patients: Are We Failing Them?

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend screening those with a family history of early-onset colorectal cancer at age 40 years or 10 years before the age of their relative's diagnosis. Currently, there is no literature reporting the screening rate in these individuals, and no protocols are in place to identify and target this population for screening awareness.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess adherence to current screening guidelines among first-degree relatives of patients with early-onset colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective and qualitative study involving a telephone survey where patients were asked about relative's screening status and barriers to screening.

SETTINGS

Two community-based institutions between January 2018 and December 2021.

PATIENTS

Individuals diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer who had undergone surgery at our institutions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of screening in first-degree relatives of our patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Other factors measured included demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and screening barriers.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were identified. The survey response rate was 66.6% (n = 24). A total of 88 first-degree relatives who met the screening criteria resulted in 67.1% of patients (n = 59) having a known screening status. Of the 59 patients with known screening status, only 44% (n = 26) had undergone screening. Patients of Black race, having stage III/IV disease, having Medicare/Medicaid insurance, and living within Baltimore City County were more likely to have family members with unknown or no screening. Lack of insurance coverage was the most common barrier, which was noted in 12.5% of patients (n = 3), whereas 54.1% of patients (n = 13) reported no barriers to screening.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Most first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer do not undergo colorectal cancer screening. This could be attributed to the lack of protocols that could guarantee these individuals are informed of their elevated risk and the different options available for screening. Furthermore, our study suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities exist among high-risk patients who should pursue screening. See Video Abstract .

BAJAS TASAS DE DETECCIN DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN LOS FAMILIARES DE PRIMER GRADO DE NUESTROS PACIENTES LES ESTAMOS FALLANDO

ANTECEDENTES:Las directrices recomiendan realizar pruebas de detección a las personas con antecedentes familiares de cáncer colorrectal de aparición temprana a los 40 años o 10 años antes de la edad del diagnóstico de su familiar. Actualmente, no hay literatura que informe la tasa de detección en estos individuos y no existen protocolos para identificar y dirigirse a esta población para concientizar sobre la detección.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el cumplimiento de las pautas de detección actuales entre los FDR de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal de aparición temprana.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo y cualitativo que incluyó una encuesta telefónica en la que se preguntó a los pacientes sobre el estado de detección de sus familiares y las barreras para la detección.AJUSTES:Dos instituciones comunitarias entre enero de 2018 y diciembre de 2021.PACIENTES:Personas diagnosticadas con cáncer colorrectal de inicio temprano que habían sido intervenidas quirúrgicamente en nuestras instituciones.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de detección en familiares de primer grado de nuestros pacientes con cáncer colorrectal de aparición temprana. Otros factores medidos incluyeron datos demográficos, características clínico-patológicas y barreras de detección.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron treinta y seis pacientes. La tasa de respuesta a la encuesta fue del 66,6% (n = 24). Resultaron un total de 88 familiares de primer grado que cumplieron con los criterios para la detección, y el 67,1% (n = 59) tenía un estado de detección conocido. De los 59 con estado de detección conocido, se informó que solo el 44% (n = 26) se había sometido a pruebas de detección. Los pacientes de raza afroamericana, enfermedad en etapa III/IV, Medicare/Medicaid y que vivían dentro del condado de la ciudad de Baltimore tenían más probabilidades de tener familiares con pruebas de detección desconocidas o sin ellas. La falta de cobertura de seguro fue la barrera más común observada por el 12,5% (n = 3); mientras que el 54,1% (n = 13) no informó ninguna barrera para el cribado.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La mayoría de los familiares de primer grado de pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer colorrectal de aparición temprana no se someten a pruebas de detección de cáncer colorrectal. Esto podría atribuirse a la falta de protocolos que garanticen que estas personas estén informadas sobre su elevado riesgo y las diferentes opciones disponibles para el cribado. Además, nuestro estudio sugiere que existen disparidades raciales y socioeconómicas entre los pacientes de alto riesgo que deberían someterse a pruebas de detección. (Traducción-Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Hereditary Gastrointestinal Tumor Syndromes: When Risk Comes with Your Genes

Despite recent campaigns for screening and the latest advances in cancer therapy and molecular biology, gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms remain among the most frequent and lethal human tumors. Most GI neoplasms are sporadic, but there are some well-known familial syndromes associated with a significant risk of developing both benign and malignant GI tumors. Although some of these entities were described more than a century ago based on clinical grounds, the increasing molecular information obtained with high-throughput techniques has shed light on the pathogenesis of several of them. The vast amount of information gained from next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of some high-risk genetic variants, although others remain to be discovered. The opportunity for genetic assessment and counseling in these families has dramatically changed the management of these syndromes, though it has also resulted in significant psychological distress for the affected patients, especially those with indeterminate variants. Herein, we aim to summarize the most relevant hereditary cancer syndromes involving the stomach and colon, with an emphasis on new molecular findings, novel entities, and recent changes in the management of these patients.

Germline findings in cancer predisposing genes from a small cohort of chordoma patients

INTRODUCTION

Chordoma is a rare slow-growing tumor that occurs along the length of the spinal axis and arises from primitive notochordal remnants (Stepanek et al., Am J Med Genet 75:335-336, 1998). Most chordomas are sporadic, but a small percentage of cases are due to hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) such as tuberous sclerosis 1 and 2 (TSC1/2), or constitutional variants in the gene encoding brachyury T (TBXT) (Pillay et al., Nat Genet 44:1185-1187, 2012; Yang et al., Nat Genet 41:1176-1178, 2009).

PURPOSE

The genetic susceptibility of these tumors is not well understood; there are only a small number of studies that have performed germline genetic testing in this population.

METHODS

We performed germline genetic in chordoma patients using genomic DNA extracted by blood or saliva.

CONCLUSION

We report here a chordoma cohort of 24 families with newly found germline genetic mutations in cancer predisposing genes. We discuss implications for genetic counseling, clinical management, and universal germline genetic testing for cancer patients with solid tumors.

The Evolution of Genetic Testing from Focused Testing to Panel Testing and from Patient Focused to Population Testing: Are We There Yet?

The field of cancer genetics has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. Genetic testing has become less expensive and more comprehensive which has changed practice patterns. It is no longer necessary to restrict testing to those with the highest likelihood of testing positive. In addition, we have learned that the criteria developed to determine who has the highest likelihood of testing positive are neither sensitive nor specific. As a result, the field is moving from testing only the highest risk patients identified based on testing criteria to testing all cancer patients. This requires new service delivery models where testing can be mainstreamed into oncology clinics and posttest genetic counseling can be provided to individuals who test positive and those with concerning personal or family histories who test negative. The use of videos, testing kiosks, chatbots, and genetic counseling assistants have been employed to help facilitate testing at a larger scale and have good patient uptake and satisfaction. While testing is important for cancer patients as it may impact their treatment, future cancer risks, and family member's cancer risks, it is unfortunate that their cancer could not be prevented in the first place. Population testing for all adults would be a strategy to identify individuals with adult-onset diseases before they develop cancer in an attempt to prevent it entirely. A few research studies (Healthy Nevada and MyCode) have offered population testing for the three Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tier 1 conditions: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia finding a prevalence of 1 in 70 individuals in the general population. We anticipate that testing for all cancer patients and the general population will continue to increase over the next 20 years and the genetics community needs to help lead the way to ensure this happens in a responsible manner.

Gene mutation profiling in microsatellite instability colorectal cancer and its association with the efficacy of immunotherapy: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) is known for its heightened responsiveness to immunotherapy. However, establishing robust predictive markers for immunotherapy efficacy remains imperative. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the genetic landscape of MSI-H CRC and correlate these genetic alterations with immunotherapy outcomes in a cohort of 121 patients.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical and molecular data from 121 patients with MSI-H CRC. We conducted a thorough genetic analysis of MSI-H CRC patients, with a specific emphasis on the APC, TP53, RAS, and MMR genes. We further analyzed the relationship between gene mutations and immunotherapy efficacy. The primary endpoints analyzed were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS26.0 and R 4.2.0 software.

RESULTS

Our findings underscored the complexity of the genetic landscape in MSI-H CRC, shedding light on the intricate interplay of these genes in CRC development. Notably, mutations in MMR genes exhibited a distinctive pattern, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms of MSI-H. Furthermore, our results revealed correlations between specific genetic alterations and immunotherapy outcomes, with a particular focus on treatment response rates and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

This study represents a significant step toward unraveling the genetic nuances of MSI-H CRC. The distinctive pattern of MMR gene mutations not only adds depth to our understanding of MSI-H CRC but also hints at potential avenues for targeted therapies. This research sets the stage for future investigations aimed at refining therapeutic strategies and improving outcomes for patients with MSI-H CRC.

Birth Cohort Colorectal Cancer (CRC): Implications for Research and Practice

Colorectal cancer (CRC) epidemiology is changing due to a birth cohort effect, first recognized by increasing incidence of early onset CRC (EOCRC, age <50 years). In this paper, we define "birth cohort CRC" as the observed phenomenon, among individuals born 1960 and later, of increasing CRC risk across successive birth cohorts, rising EOCRC incidence, increasing incidence among individuals aged 50 to 54 years, and flattening of prior decreasing incidence among individuals aged 55 to 74 years. We demonstrate birth cohort CRC is associated with unique features, including increasing rectal cancer (greater than colon) and distant (greater than local) stage CRC diagnosis, and increasing EOCRC across all racial/ethnic groups. We review potential risk factors, etiologies, and mechanisms for birth cohort CRC, using EOCRC as a starting point and describing importance of viewing these through the lens of birth cohort. We also outline implications of birth cohort CRC for epidemiologic and translational research, as well as current clinical practice. We postulate that recognition of birth cohort CRC as an entity-including and extending beyond rising EOCRC-can advance understanding of risk factors, etiologies, and mechanisms, and address the public health consequences of changing CRC epidemiology.

PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the Western world, and metastatic disease is associated with a dismal prognosis. Poly-ADpribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors gain increasing attention in the field of medical oncology, as they lead to synthetic lethality in malignancies with preexisting alterations in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. As those alterations are frequently seen in CRC, a targeted approach through PARP inhibitors is expected to benefit these patients, both alone and in combination with other agents like chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antiangiogenics, and radiation.

OBJECTIVE

This review article aims to better clarify the role of PARP inhibitors as a treatment option in patients with metastatic CRC with alterations in the DDR pathway.

METHODS

We used the PubMed database to retrieve journal articles and the inclusion criteria were all human studies that illustrated the effective role of PARP inhibitors in patients with metastatic CRC with homologous repair deficiency (HRD) and the correct line of therapy.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports the utilization of PARP inhibitors in CRC subgroups, as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. Up to now, data are insufficient to support a formal indication, and further research is needed.

CONCLUSION

Efforts to precisely define the homologous repair deficiency (HRD) in CRC - and eventually the subgroup of patients that are expected to benefit the most - are also underway.

Genetic insights: High germline variant rate in an indigenous African cohort with early-onset colorectal cancer

Introduction

The increase in incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients of African ancestry coupled with increased aggressiveness has warranted investigation of the heritable nature of these cancers. Only a limited number of published reports of hereditary colorectal cancer in indigenous African populations have been reported and no systematic screening of these groups has been performed previously. We aimed to investigate causative germline variants and to establish the incidence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in the known colorectal cancer genes in indigenous African colorectal cancer patients using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel.

Materials and methods

Patients were selected from two hospitals in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients with unresolved molecular diagnosis with an age of onset below or at 60 years were selected. Germline DNA samples were analyzed using a 14-gene NGS panel on the Ion Torrent platform. Variant calling and annotation were performed, and variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Observed variants were verified by Sanger sequencing and/or long-range PCR.

Results

Out of 107 patients, 25 (23.4%) presented with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant (PGV). Fourteen PGVs in at least one mismatch repair (MMR) gene were identified and verified in 12 patients (11.2%). Of these MMR gene variants, five were novel. The remaining 10 PGVs were in the APC, BMPR1A, MUTYH, POLD1, and TP53 genes.

Conclusion

The high incidence of PGVs associated with early-onset colorectal cancer in indigenous African patients has important implications for hereditary colorectal cancer risk management. These findings pave the way for personalized genetic screening programs and cascade testing in South Africa. The next step would involve further screening of the unresolved cases using tools to detect copy number variation, methylation, and whole exome sequencing.

Using an anomaly detection approach for the segmentation of colorectal cancer tumors in whole slide images

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. Genetic testing is critical in assisting in the early detection of CRC and selection of individualized treatment plans, which have shown to improve the survival rate of CRC patients. The tissue slide review (TSR), a tumor tissue macro-dissection procedure, is a required pre-analytical step to perform genetic testing. Due to the subjective nature of the process, major discrepancies in CRC diagnostics by pathologists are reported, and metrics for quality are often only qualitative. Progressive context encoder anomaly detection (P-CEAD) is an anomaly detection approach to detect tumor tissue from whole slide images (WSIs), since tumor tissue is by its nature, an anomaly. P-CEAD-based CRC tumor segmentation achieves a 71% 26% sensitivity, 92% 7% specificity, and 63% 23% F1 score. The proposed approach provides an automated CRC tumor segmentation pipeline with a quantitatively reproducible quality compared with the conventional manual tumor segmentation procedure.

Clinical Multigene Panel Testing Identifies Racial and Ethnic Differences in Germline Pathogenic Variants Among Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) burden differs across racial/ethnic groups, yet the role of germline genetic predisposition in EOCRC disparities remains uncharacterized. We defined the prevalence and spectrum of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility gene variations among patients with EOCRC by race and ethnicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included individuals diagnosed with a first primary CRC between age 15 and 49 years who identified as Ashkenazi Jewish, Asian, Black, Hispanic, or White and underwent germline genetic testing of 14 CRC susceptibility genes performed by a clinical testing laboratory. Variant comparisons by racial and ethnic groups were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, CRC site, and number of primary colorectal tumors.

RESULTS

Among 3,980 patients with EOCRC, a total of 530 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 485 individuals (12.2%). By race/ethnicity, 12.7% of Ashkenazim patients, 9.5% of Asian patients, 10.3% of Black patients, 14.0% of Hispanic patients, and 12.4% of White patients carried a germline variant. The prevalence of Lynch syndrome (P = .037), as well as APC, CHEK2, MLH1, monoallelic MUTYH, and PTEN variants, varied by race/ethnicity among patients with EOCRC (all P < .026). Ashkenazim and Hispanic patients had significantly higher odds of presenting with a pathogenic APC variant, which included p.I1307K (odds ratio [OR], 2.67; 95% CI, 1.30 to 5.49; P = .007) and MLH1 variant (OR, 8.69; 95% CI, 2.68 to 28.20; P = .0003), respectively, versus White patients in adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

Germline genetic features differed by race/ethnicity in young patients with CRC, suggesting that current multigene panel tests may not be representative of EOCRC risk in diverse populations. Further study is needed to optimize genes selected for genetic testing in EOCRC via ancestry-specific gene and variant discovery to yield equitable clinical benefits for all patients and to mitigate inequities in disease burden.

Exploring Stakeholders' Perspectives on Implementing Universal Germline Testing for Colorectal Cancer: Findings From a Clinical Practice Survey

PURPOSE

New guidelines recommend considering germline genetic testing for all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is a lack of data on stakeholders' perspectives on the advantages and barriers of implementing universal germline testing (UGT). This study assessed the perspectives of members of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer (CGA-IGC) regarding the implementation of UGT for patients with CRC, including readiness, logistics, and barriers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was sent to 317 active members of CGA-IGC. The survey included sections on demographics, clinical practice specialty, established institutional practices for testing, and questions pertaining to support of and barriers to implementing UGT for patients with CRC.

RESULTS

Eighty CGA-IGC members (25%) participated, including 42 genetic counselors (53%) and 14 gastroenterologists (18%). Forty-seven (59%) reported an academic medical center as their primary work setting, and most participants (56%) had more than 10 years of clinical practice. Although most participants (73%) supported UGT, 54% indicated that changes in practice would be required before adopting UGT, and 39% indicated that these changes would be challenging to implement. There was support for both genetics and nongenetics providers to order genetic testing, and a majority (57%) supported a standardized multigene panel rather than a customized gene panel. Key barriers to UGT implementation included limited genetics knowledge among nongenetics providers, time-consuming processes for obtaining consent, ordering tests, disclosing results, and lack of insurance coverage.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates wide support among hereditary GI cancer experts for implementation of UGT for patients with CRC. However, alternative service delivery models using nongenetics providers should be considered to address the logistical barriers to UGT implementation, particularly the growing demand for genetic testing.

Completion of Genetic Testing and Incidence of Pathogenic Germline Mutation among Patients with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Single Institution Analysis

Over the past 20 years, rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC), defined as <50 years of age at diagnosis, have increased, with 16-25% associated with a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) resulting in a hereditary cancer syndrome. In the present study, we sought to further characterize PGVs observed in patients with eoCRC. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a history of CRC referred for genetic counseling at Mayo Clinic Rochester between April 2019 and April 2022. Three hundred and three CRC patients were referred to medical genetics, including 124 with a history of eoCRC. Only 84 patients (68%) with eoCRC referred for genetic counseling completed genetic testing, with an average of 48 genes evaluated. PGVs were identified in 27.4% with eoCRC, including 8.3% with Lynch syndrome (LS). Other detected PGVs known to increase the risk of CRC included MUTYH (4.8%), CHEK2 (3.6%), APC, BMPR1A, and TP53 (1.3% each). Among those with aoCRC, 109 patients (61%) completed genetic testing, among which 88% had either a dMMR tumor, personal history of an additional LS malignancy, or family history of LS malignancy, with PGVs detected in 23% of patients. This study reinforces the importance for all patients with CRC, especially those with eoCRC, to undergo germline testing.

Clonal Evolution in Healthy and Premalignant Tissues: Implications for Early Cancer Interception Strategies

Histologically normal human tissues accumulate significant mutational burden with age. The extent and spectra of mutagenesis are comparable both in rapidly proliferating and post-mitotic tissues and in stem cells compared with their differentiated progeny. Some of these mutations provide increased fitness, giving rise to clones which, at times, can replace the entire surface area of tissues. Compared with cancer, somatic mutations in histologically normal tissues are primarily single-nucleotide variations. Interestingly though, the presence of these mutations and positive clonal selection in isolation remains a poor indicator of potential future cancer transformation in solid tissues. Common clonally expanded mutations in histologically normal tissues also do not always represent the most frequent early mutations in cancers of corresponding tissues, indicating differences in selection pressures. Preliminary evidence implies that stroma and immune system co-evolve with age, which may impact selection dynamics. In this review, we will explore the mutational landscape of histologically normal and premalignant human somatic tissues in detail and discuss cell-intrinsic and environmental factors that can determine the fate of positively selected mutations within them. Precisely pinpointing these determinants of cancer transformation would aid development of early cancer interventional and prevention strategies.

Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC.

METHODS

After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%.

RESULTS

The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.

Big Data in Gastroenterology Research

Studying individual data types in isolation provides only limited and incomplete answers to complex biological questions and particularly falls short in revealing sufficient mechanistic and kinetic details. In contrast, multi-omics approaches to studying health and disease permit the generation and integration of multiple data types on a much larger scale, offering a comprehensive picture of biological and disease processes. Gastroenterology and hepatobiliary research are particularly well-suited to such analyses, given the unique position of the luminal gastrointestinal (GI) tract at the nexus between the gut (mucosa and luminal contents), brain, immune and endocrine systems, and GI microbiome. The generation of 'big data' from multi-omic, multi-site studies can enhance investigations into the connections between these organ systems and organisms and more broadly and accurately appraise the effects of dietary, pharmacological, and other therapeutic interventions. In this review, we describe a variety of useful omics approaches and how they can be integrated to provide a holistic depiction of the human and microbial genetic and proteomic changes underlying physiological and pathophysiological phenomena. We highlight the potential pitfalls and alternatives to help avoid the common errors in study design, execution, and analysis. We focus on the application, integration, and analysis of big data in gastroenterology and hepatobiliary research.

Lynch Syndrome Genetics and Clinical Implications

Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the most prevalent hereditary cancer syndromes in humans and accounts for some 3% of unselected patients with colorectal or endometrial cancer and 10%-15% of those with DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumors. Previous studies have established the genetic basis of LS predisposition, but there have been significant advances recently in the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of LS tumors, which has important implications in clinical management. At the same time, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced cancers with DNA mismatch repair defects. We aim to review the recent progress in the LS field and discuss how the accumulating epidemiologic, clinical, and molecular information has contributed to a more accurate and complete picture of LS, resulting in genotype- and immunologic subtype-specific strategies for surveillance, cancer prevention, and treatment.

Genetic Predisposition to Colorectal Cancer: How Many and Which Genes to Test?

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumors, and genetic predisposition is one of the key risk factors in the development of this malignancy. Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis are the best-known genetic diseases associated with hereditary colorectal cancer. However, some other genetic disorders confer an increased risk of colorectal cancer, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 gene), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MUTYH gene), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11 gene), Cowden syndrome (PTEN gene), and juvenile polyposis syndrome (BMPR1A and SMAD4 genes). Moreover, the recent advances in molecular techniques, in particular Next-Generation Sequencing, have led to the identification of many new genes involved in the predisposition to colorectal cancers, such as RPS20, POLE, POLD1, AXIN2, NTHL1, MSH3, RNF43 and GREM1. In this review, we summarized the past and more recent findings in the field of cancer predisposition genes, with insights into the role of the encoded proteins and into the associated genetic disorders. Furthermore, we discussed the possible clinical utility of genetic testing in terms of prevention protocols and therapeutic approaches.

Ashkenazi Jewish and Other White APC I1307K Carriers Are at Higher Risk for Multiple Cancers

Purpose: APC I1307K has a higher prevalence among Ashkenazi Jews (AJ), and a two-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to non-Jewish populations. We assessed CRC and extracolonic malignancies among I1307K carriers from AJ and non-AJ whites (NAW). Methods: We compared the rate of I1307K in cancer patients who underwent germline genetic testing via a multi-gene panel with healthy subjects retrieved from the gnomAD database. Cases undergoing testing were not selected and testing was undertaken through a commercial laboratory. Results: Overall, 586/7624 (7.6%) AJ with cancer carried I1307K compared to 342/4918 (6.9%) in the AJ control group (p = NS). In the NAW, 318/141,673 (0.2%) cancer patients and 73/58,918 (0.1%) controls carried the variant [OR = 1.8, (95% CI 1.41−2.35), p < 0.001]. I1307K in NAW was associated with an increased risk of CRC [OR = 1.95, (95% CI 1.39−2.73), p < 0.01], melanoma [OR = 2.54, (95% CI 1.57−3.98)], breast [females, OR = 1.73, (95% CI 1.18−2.65), p < 0.01], and prostate cancer [males, OR = 2.42, (95% CI 1.45−3.94), p < 0.01]. Among AJ, the variant increased the risk for CRC [OR = 1.67, (95% CI 1.36−2.05), p < 0.001] and renal cancer [OR = 1.64, (95% CI 1.04−2.47)]. AJ men had a higher risk for any cancer [OR = 1.32, (95% CI 1.05−1.66), p < 0.05] and melanoma [OR = 2.04, (95% CI 1.24−3.22); p < 0.05]. Conclusions: This is the most extensive study to date conducted on I1307K carriers, although it is amenable to selection bias. NAW carrying I1307K had a higher risk of any cancer and several specific cancer types, whereas AJ carrying the variant had a risk for only a few select cancers. Our data add to the research base on I1307 carriers concerning future risk management.

The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in Estonian colorectal cancer patients: results from routine clinical setting 2016-2021

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Estonia in both women and men. According to the Estonian National Institute for Health Development, in 2017, there were 357 new colon cancer only cases in women and 282 in men. For colorectal cancer, the number for men and women altogether was 1040 in the same year. In 2018, there were over 1.8 million new cases worldwide. The Mayo Clinic found in a prospective, two-year multi-site study of CRC patients that 15.5% of patients carried pathogenic germline variants (PGV), using an >80 gene Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel. Material and methods: This retrospective study aimed to analyse the estimated prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in Estonian colorectal cancer patients using NGS in a routine clinical setting. We gathered five-year data (July 2016-July 2021) of colorectal cancer patients (mostly not selected for age or family history) tested with either Illumina TruSight Cancer (94 genes) or TruSight Hereditary Cancer (113 genes) NGS panels. Results: Three hundred and fourteen NGS analyses were performed due to either CRC or polyposis in anamnesis and/or family anamnesis, including 126 CRC cases and 44 colorectal polyposis cases, while 144 were either healthy family members or had other types of cancers. While a known disease-causing variant was identified in 16.4% of all cancer patients tested, we found that 21.4% of CRC patients had such a variant. Among the 44 colorectal polyps cases MLH1, gene was the most affected one (25%), the second and third most affected genes were MSH2 and CHEK2. Other genes with disease-causing variants found in CRC patients included APC, BLM, BMPR1A, BRCA1, FANCM, MSH6, MUTYH, PMS2, SMAD4, SPINK1 and VHL. Conclusion: Our result give an overview of genetic testing of CRC patients, the prevalence of disease-causing variants and their landscape in Estonia. According to Estonian data, only 2.7-6.1% of CRC patients are genetically tested, which is around ten times less frequently than breast cancer patients and their family members. The diagnostic yield of CRC patients is 21.4%, suggesting that genetic testing will likely improve timely diagnosis and outcomes.

Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance

The Asia-Pacific region has the largest number of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and one of the highest levels of mortality due to this condition in the world. Since the publishing of two consensus recommendations in 2008 and 2015, significant advancements have been made in our knowledge of epidemiology, pathology and the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma progression. Based on the most updated epidemiological and clinical studies in this region, considering literature from international studies, and adopting the modified Delphi process, the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated and revised their recommendations on (1) screening methods and preferred strategies; (2) age for starting and terminating screening for CRC; (3) screening for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma; (4) surveillance for those with adenomas; (5) screening and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions and (6) quality assurance of screening programmes. Thirteen countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific region were represented in this exercise. International advisors from North America and Europe were invited to participate.

Multigene Panel Testing Yields High Rates of Clinically Actionable Variants Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Whether germline multigene panel testing (MGPT) should be performed in all individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to determine the yield and potential clinical impact of MGPT across a large, diverse CRC cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with CRC who underwent MGPT of > 10 genes at a commercial laboratory between March 2015 and May 2021. All data were prospectively collected through a single commercial laboratory and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 34,244 individuals with a history of CRC underwent germline MPGT and were included in the analysis. This cohort was predominantly female (60.7%), White (70.6%), and age 50 years or older (68.9%), with 35.5% also reporting a noncolorectal malignancy. At least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant (PGV) was found in 4,864 (14.2%), with 3,111 (9.1%) having a PGV associated with increased CRC/polyposis risk and 1,048 (3.1%) having an otherwise clinically actionable PGV. Larger gene panels were not clearly associated with higher yield of clinically actionable PGVs. PGVs were more prevalent in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent (P < .001) and Hispanic ethnicity (P < .001). Across all ages, panel sizes, and races/ethnicities, the rate of clinically actionable PGVs on MGPT was 7.9% or greater. A variant of uncertain significance was identified in 13,094 individuals (38.2%). Identification of a variant of uncertain significance associated with panel size (P < .001) and was lower in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent (P < .001), but higher in Black, Asian, and Hispanic individuals (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date examining MGPT in CRC, demonstrating high rates of clinically actionable variants detected across all age groups, panel sizes, and racial/ethnic groups. This work supports consideration of broadening germline genetic testing criteria for individuals with CRC.

Comparison of Germline Genetic Testing Before and After a Medical Policy Covering Universal Testing Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

In 2020, some health insurance plans updated their medical policy to cover germline genetic testing for all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). Guidelines for universal tumor screening via microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemistry (MSI/IHC) for mismatch repair protein expression for patients with CRC have been in place since 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether uptake of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing in patients with CRC has improved under these policies and to identify actionable findings and management implications for patients referred for germline genetic testing.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The multicenter, retrospective cohort study comprised 2 analyses of patients 18 years or older who were diagnosed with CRC between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. The first analysis used an insurance claims data set to examine use of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing for patients diagnosed with CRC between 2017 and 2020 and treated with systemic therapy. The second comprised patients with CRC who had germline genetic testing performed in 2020 that was billed under a universal testing policy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient demographic characteristics, clinical information, and use of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing were analyzed.

RESULTS

For 9066 patients with newly diagnosed CRC (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [12.7] years; 4964 [54.8%] male), administrative claims data indicated that MSI/IHC was performed in 6645 eligible patients (73.3%) during the study period, with 2288 (25.2%) not receiving MSI/IHC despite being eligible for coverage. Analysis of a second cohort of 55 595 patients with CRC diagnosed in 2020 and covered by insurance found that only 1675 (3.0%) received germline genetic testing. In a subset of patients for whom germline genetic testing results were available, 1 in 6 patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, with most of these patients having variants with established clinical actionability.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This nationwide cohort study found suboptimal rates of MSI/IHC screening and germline genetic testing uptake, resulting in clinically actionable genetic data being unavailable to patients diagnosed with CRC, despite universal eligibility. Effective strategies are required to address barriers to implementation of evidence-based universal testing policies that support precision treatment and optimal care management for patients with CRC.

Discrepancies between tumor genomic profiling and germline genetic testing

BACKGROUND

Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) often incidentally identifies germline pathogenic variants (PVs) associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Methods used by somatic testing laboratories, including germline analysis, differ from designated germline laboratories that have optimized the identification of germline PVs. This study evaluated discrepancies between somatic and germline testing results, and their impact on patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chart reviews were carried out at a single institution for patients who had both somatic and designated germline genetic testing. Cases with discrepant results in which germline PVs were not detected by the somatic laboratory or in which variant classification differed are summarized.

RESULTS

TGP was carried out on 2811 cancer patients, 600 of whom also underwent designated germline genetic testing. Germline PVs were identified for 109 individuals. Discrepancies between germline genetic testing and tumor profiling reports were identified in 20 cases, including 14 PVs identified by designated germline genetic testing laboratories that were not reported by somatic testing laboratories and six variants with discrepant classifications between the designated germline and somatic testing laboratories. Three PVs identified by designated germline laboratories are targets for poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and resulted in different treatment options. Of the PVs identified by designated germline laboratories, 60% (n = 12) were in genes with established associations to the patients' cancer, and 40% of the PVs were incidental. The majority (90%) of all discrepant findings, both contributory and incidental, changed management recommendations for these patients, highlighting the importance of comprehensive germline assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods used by somatic laboratories, regardless of the inclusion of germline analysis, differ from those of designated germline laboratories for identifying germline PVs. Unrecognized germline PVs may harm patients by missing hereditary syndromes and targeted therapy opportunities (e.g. anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors). Clinicians should refer patients who meet the criteria for genetic evaluation regardless of somatic testing outcomes.

Microsatellite instability testing in colorectal patients with Lynch syndrome: lessons learned from a case report and how to avoid such pitfalls

We present the case of a patient with Lynch syndrome and metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). The initial immunohistochemistry (IHC) test for deficient mismatch repair gave a false negative result. However, the same mutation has accurately has been detected with IHC in other cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI) This supports the determining role of somatic missense mutations in MMR IHC. MSI-PCR testing confirmed MSI and the patient benefited from nivolumab with a complete metabolic response. We explain the rationale for immunotherapy in mCRC, current testing strategies and discuss future developments in MSI testing. We advocate for upfront testing using both IHC and MSI-PCR to direct therapy in mCRC, and a greater understanding of IHC and MSI-PCR testing pitfalls.

A Scoring Model and Protocol to Adapt Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome to Identify Germline Pathogenic Variants by Next Generation Sequencing from Colorectal Cancer Patients and Cascade Screening

Simple Summary

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal-dominantly inherited form of cancer predisposition dominated by colorectal cancer (CRC). LS is caused by germline pathogenic variants (PV) occurring in known mismatch repair genes. For effective cascade screening, it is critical to identify PV for LS predisposition. When limited resources are available, next generation sequencing (NGS) of an entire cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, even those under 50 or 60 years of age, places a huge burden on the system. Here, we present an innovative LS ascertainment and follow-up program that includes LS molecular analysis, PV screening with NGS technology, and cascade screening. The goal is to improve LS ascertainment in light of the growing burden of early-onset CRC, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Abstract

Identification of germline pathogenic variants (PV) predisposing to Lynch syndrome (LS) is an important step for effective use of cascade screening of extended at-risk lineages, leading to reduced morbidity and mortality due to colorectal cancer (CRC). As a general rule, however, next generation sequencing (NGS, either of gene panels or whole exomes) is relatively expensive and unaffordable for general clinical use. In resource-poor settings, performing NGS testing on an entire cohort of CRC patients, even if limited to those under 50 or 60 years of age, still places an enormous burden on limited resources. Although family history can be a good indicator for LS testing, identifying at-risk family members and offering cascade screening may not benefit many patients/probands without an obvious family history. This article presents a novel program called Modified Ascertainment and follow-up Program (MAP) with a scoring model for LS ascertainment and molecular screening by NGS with diagnosis confirmation of PV and cascade screening. The goal is to improve LS ascertainment in light of the growing burden of early-onset CRC, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Through MAP, judiciously applied molecular genetics will improve identification of PV predisposing to LS and cascade screening.

Point/Counterpoint: Is It Time for Universal Germline Genetic Testing for all GI Cancers?

Use of germline genetic testing among patients with cancer is increasing because of (1) the availability of multigene panel tests that include multiple cancer susceptibility genes in a single test, (2) decreased costs of these tests and improvements in insurance coverage, and (3) US Food and Drug Administration-approval of genotype-directed therapies such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for individuals with certain cancers and pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (with possible benefits with other genes in the homologous repair deficiency pathway). In addition, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines have already endorsed germline genetic testing for all patients with certain cancer types (epithelial ovarian cancer, exocrine pancreatic cancer, and high-grade/metastatic prostate cancer), regardless of age or personal/family history of cancer. Herein, we debate the pros and cons of offering germline multigene panel testing to all patients diagnosed with any GI cancer. The authors agree that it may just be a matter of time before germline multigene panel testing is offered to all patients with cancer; however, this article will highlight some of the benefits, risks, and limitations of this approach so that research can help fill some of the gaps to ensure that genetic medicine continues to be implemented in ways that improve real-world patient care and outcomes.

Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria

Genetic testing for cancer predisposition has been curtailed by the cost of sequencing, and testing has been restricted by eligibility criteria. As the cost of sequencing decreases, the question of expanding multi-gene cancer panels to a broader population arises. We evaluated how many additional actionable genetic variants are returned by unrestricted panel testing in the private sector compared to those which would be returned by adhering to current NHS eligibility criteria. We reviewed 152 patients referred for multi-gene cancer panels in the private sector between 2014 and 2016. Genetic counselling and disclosure of all results was standard of care provided by the Consultant. Every panel conducted was compared to current eligibility criteria. A germline pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant (P/LP), in a gene relevant to the personal or family history of cancer, was detected in 15 patients (detection rate of 10%). 46.7% of those found to have the P/LP variants (7 of 15), or 4.6% of the entire set (7 of 152), did not fulfil NHS eligibility criteria. 46.7% of P/LP variants in this study would have been missed by national testing guidelines, all of which were actionable. However, patients who do not fulfil eligibility criteria have a higher Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) burden. We demonstrated that the current England NHS threshold for genetic testing is missing pathogenic variants which would alter management in 4.6%, nearly 1 in 20 individuals. However, the clinical service burden that would ensue is a detection of VUS of 34%.

Survey of germline variants in cancer-associated genes in young adults with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in young adults is rising. Identifying genetic risk factors is fundamental for the clinical management of patients and their families. This study aimed to identify clinically significant germline variants among young adults with CRC. Whole-exome sequencing data of blood-derived DNA from 133 unrelated young CRC patients (<55 years of age) underwent a comprehensive analysis of 133 cancer-predisposition/implicated genes. All patient tumors were evaluated for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Among 133 patients (aged 16-54 years), 15% (20/133) had clinically actionable pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in at least 1 well established cancer-predisposing gene: dMMR genes (6), MUTYH [bi-allelic (2), mono-allelic (3)], RNF43 (1), BMPR1A (1), BRCA2 (4), ATM (1), RAD51C (1), and BRIP1 (1). Five patients (4%) had variants in genes implicated in cancer but where the significance of germline variants in CRC risk is uncertain: GATA2 (1), ERCC2 (mono-allelic) (1), ERCC4 (mono-allelic) (1), CFTR (2). Fourteen (11%) had dMMR tumors. Eighteen (14%) reported a first-degree relative with CRC, but only three of these carried P/LP variants. Three patients with variants in polyposis-associated genes showed no polyposis (one each in MUTYH [bi-allelic], RNF43, and BMPR1A). Approximately one in five young adults in our series carried at least one P/LP variant in a cancer-predisposing/implicated gene; 80% of these variants are currently considered clinically actionable in a familial cancer setting. Family history and phenotype have limitations for genetic risk prediction; therefore multigene panel testing and genetic counseling are warranted for all young adults with CRC regardless of those two factors.

Exploring the Inflammatory Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide. Traditionally, mechanisms of colorectal cancer formation have focused on genetic alterations including chromosomal damage and microsatellite instability. In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting the role of inflammation in colorectal cancer formation. Multiple cytokines, immune cells such T cells and macrophages, and other immune mediators have been identified in pathways leading to the initiation, growth, and metastasis of colorectal cancer. Outside the previously explored mechanisms and pathways leading to colorectal cancer, initiatives have been shifted to further study the role of inflammation in pathogenesis. Inflammatory pathways have also been linked to some traditional risk factors of colorectal cancer such as obesity, smoking and diabetes, as well as more novel associations such as the gut microbiome, the gut mycobiome and exosomes. In this review, we will explore the roles of obesity and diet, smoking, diabetes, the microbiome, the mycobiome and exosomes in colorectal cancer, with a specific focus on the underlying inflammatory and metabolic pathways involved. We will also investigate how the study of colon cancer from an inflammatory background not only creates a more holistic and inclusive understanding of this disease, but also creates unique opportunities for prevention, early diagnosis and therapy.

From APC to the genetics of hereditary and familial colon cancer syndromes

Hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes attributable to high penetrance mutations represent 9-26% of young-onset CRC cases. The clinical significance of many of these mutations is understood well enough to be used in diagnostics and as an aid in patient care. However, despite the advances made in the field, a significant proportion of familial and early-onset cases remains molecularly uncharacterized and extensive work is still needed to fully understand the genetic nature of CRC susceptibility. With the emergence of next-generation sequencing and associated methods, several predisposition loci have been unraveled, but validation is incomplete. Individuals with cancer-predisposing mutations are currently enrolled in life-long surveillance, but with the development of new treatments, such as cancer vaccinations, this might change in the not so distant future for at least some individuals. For individuals without a known cause for their disease susceptibility, prevention and therapy options are less precise. Herein, we review the progress achieved in the last three decades with a focus on how CRC predisposition genes were discovered. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical implications of these discoveries and anticipate what to expect in the next decade.

Genetic testing in ambulatory cardiology clinics reveals high rate of findings with clinical management implications

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in adults in the United States, yet the benefits of genetic testing are not universally accepted.

METHODS

We developed the "HeartCare" panel of genes associated with CVD, evaluating high-penetrance Mendelian conditions, coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk, LPA gene polymorphisms, and specific pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants. We enrolled 709 individuals from cardiology clinics at Baylor College of Medicine, and samples were analyzed in a CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory. Results were returned to the ordering physician and uploaded to the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Notably, 32% of patients had a genetic finding with clinical management implications, even after excluding PGx results, including 9% who were molecularly diagnosed with a Mendelian condition. Among surveyed physicians, 84% reported medical management changes based on these results, including specialist referrals, cardiac tests, and medication changes. LPA polymorphisms and high polygenic risk of CAD were found in 20% and 9% of patients, respectively, leading to diet, lifestyle, and other changes. Warfarin and simvastatin pharmacogenetic variants were present in roughly half of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the use of genetic information in routine cardiovascular health management and provide a roadmap for accompanying research.

A Retrospective 5-Year Single Center Study Highlighting the Risk of Cancer Predisposition in Adolescents and Young Adults

The knowledge of inherited cancer susceptibility opens a new field of cancer medicine. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study. Data of AYA cancer patients registered between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed. The median age at cancer diagnosis of 704 patients (343 males, 361 females) was 32 years (range, 15-39 years), median follow-up was 181 days (range, 1-1975 days). Solid tumors were diagnosed in 575 (81.7%) patients, hematologic malignancies in 129 (18.3%) patients. Multiple primary cancers were reported in 36 (5.1%) patients. Malignancies that may be indicators of inherited cancer susceptibility were diagnosed in 2.6% of patients with cancers of the endocrine system, in 73% of cancers of the gastrointestinal system, in 88% of tumors of the central nervous system, in 92% of cancers of the urinary tract, and in 59% of head and neck tumors. In addition, all patients with breast cancer, sarcoma, and peripheral nerve sheath tumor were in need of genetic counselling. In sum, at least 181 of 704 (25.7%) AYA cancer patients presented with malignancies suspicious of harboring pathogenic germline variants. Evaluation of AYA cancer patients for hereditary cancer predisposition needs to be integrated into daily practice.