Risk Prediction and Comparative Efficacy of Anti-TNF vs Thiopurines, for Preventing Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 6 Trials

The Impact of Postoperative Prophylactic Medication on Long-Term Surgical, Severe Endoscopic and Endoscopic or Radiologic Recurrence Following Primary Ileocecal Resection in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The impact of prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) for Crohn's disease (CD) merits further elucidation. Prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) is recommended in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), particularly in patients at increased risk of recurrence, but the impact on long-term outcomes needs to be further elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic medication on long-term prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with CD who underwent primary ICR between 2000-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative prophylactic medication [< 12 weeks following ICR] versus no postoperative prophylactic medication. Outcomes were surgical recurrence [re-resection for CD], severe endoscopic recurrence [modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) ≥ i3] and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence [mRS ≥ i2b or radiologic recurrence]. Inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW] method was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Survival and association between postoperative prophylactic medication and outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

807 patients underwent ICR (median follow-up 5.0 years); 36% received postoperative prophylactic medication. Surgical, severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence rates were significantly lower in those who received prophylactic medication (p = 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). IPTW analysis showed a lower risk of severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence in patients treated with postoperative prophylactic medication (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.97; aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.91), which also was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic (aHR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.6) and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence (aHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7) in multivariable analysis after correction for confounding factors. A comparable protective effect of postoperative prophylactic medication was sustained in patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy <1 year postoperatively and who underwent surgery on or after 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic medication following primary ICR significantly reduces long-term recurrence rates in CD and was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence.

Characterization of risk factors and postoperative pharmacological prophylaxis patterns affecting re-resection in Crohn's disease with surgical recurrence

BACKGROUND

Limited research has focused on the characterization of Crohn's disease (CD) patients with surgical recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors and postoperative pharmacological prophylaxis patterns for surgical recurrence in CD.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 349 CD patients over a 5-year follow-up after initial bowel surgery. Risk factors and postoperative pharmacological prophylaxis patterns affecting re-resection were analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was also used to identify risk factors for surgical recurrence. A nomogram was created to guide postoperative disease surveillance.

RESULTS

A total of 349 CD patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up time of 68.0 months after surgery. The overall cumulative risk of surgical recurrence was 9.7% at 5 years. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, stricturing and penetrating behavior, extensive small bowel resection, residual lesions, postoperative complications, and postoperative step-up to biologic therapy were the factors independently associated with an increased risk of surgical recurrence (P < 0.05). A nomogram with these variables had good predictive accuracy for surgical recurrence (C-index = 0.767). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with residual lesions had a higher probability of surgical recurrence (P = 0.004). Furthermore, there were significantly more patients who received early step-up to biologics after primary bowel surgery within 8 weeks in the no-recurrence group (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors were found in CD patients with surgical recurrence, and a nomogram predicting surgical recurrence could guide individual postoperative management to avoid reoperations. Postoperative pharmacological prophylaxis patterns with early step-up to biologics might reduce the re-rection incidence.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: current treatment advances, emerging targeted therapy and underlying mechanisms

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rapidly progressing, life-threatening syndrome characterized by excessive immune activation, often presenting as a complex cytokine storm. This hyperactive immune response can lead to multi-organ failure and systemic damage, resulting in an extremely short survival period if left untreated. Over the past decades, although HLH has garnered increasing attention from researchers, there have been few advancements in its treatment. The cytokine storm plays a crucial role in the treatment of HLH. Investigating the detailed mechanisms behind cytokine storms offers insights into targeted therapeutic approaches, potentially aiding in early intervention and improving the clinical outcome of HLH patients. To date, there is only one targeted therapy, emapalumab targeting interferon-γ, that has gained approval for primary HLH. This review aims to summarize the current treatment advances, emerging targeted therapeutics and underlying mechanisms of HLH, highlighting its newly discovered targets potentially involved in cytokine storms, which are expected to drive the development of novel treatments and offer fresh perspectives for future studies. Besides, multi-targeted combination therapy may be essential for disease control, but further trials are required to determine the optimal treatment mode for HLH.

Major Abdominal Surgery for Pediatric Crohn's Disease in the Anti-TNF Era: 10-Year Analysis of Data From the IBD Registry of Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition

BACKGROUND

The natural history of Crohn's disease (CD) can result in complications requiring surgery. Pediatric data are scarce about major abdominal surgery. The IBD Registry from the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition has been active since 2008 and collects data from major pediatric IBD centers in Italy. The aim of the present report was to explore the prevalence of major abdominal surgery among children affected by CD in an era when antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF-α) agents were already used so that we might appraise the incidence of surgical-related complications and identify the factors associated with postoperative disease recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients enrolled in the registry from January 2009 to December 2018. Patients with monogenic IBD and patients undergoing surgery for perianal disease were excluded.

RESULTS

In total, 135 of 1245 patients were identified. We report the prevalence of major abdominal surgery of 10.8%. Pediatric surgeons performed the procedure in 54.1% of cases, and a laparoscopic approach was used in 47.4% of surgical procedures. Seventeen patients (12.6%) experienced a total of 21 early postoperative complications, none of which was severe. A laparoscopic approach was the only factor negatively associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.8; P = .02). Fifty-four (40%) patients experienced postoperative endoscopic recurrence, and 33 (24.4%) of them experienced postoperative clinical recurrence. The postoperative treatment with anti-TNF-α drugs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of endoscopic recurrence (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.79; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the overall prevalence of major abdominal surgery was low, as well as the rate of surgical-related complications. Postoperative anti-TNF-α therapy seems be protective against endoscopic recurrence.

Preventing Recurrence of Crohn's Disease Post-Ileocaecal Surgery in Paediatric Patients: A Therapy Guide Based on Systematic Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ileocaecal resection (ICR) is frequent in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease (pCD). Despite rates of reoperation being low, the risk of clinical or endoscopic post-operative recurrence (POR) is high; effective medical strategies to prevent POR are thus needed. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to identify and evaluate the published literature on post-operative medical prevention of POR in pCD to draft a possible therapy guide for pCD patients undergoing ICR.

METHODS

We performed an SR according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards and registered it in the PROSPERO database (ID: CRD42024533855). The population, intervention, control, outcome (PICO) model was focussed on post-surgical medical prevention of POR in pCD with clearly expressed definition of recurrence (endoscopically using a standardized scoring system (e.g. Rutgeerts score) or by laboratory markers, for example, faecal calprotectin (F-CPT), C-reactive protein (CRP) or by histological findings or by clinical activity indexes [e.g. weighted paediatric Crohn's disease activity index - (w)PCDAI]. From inception until 29 February 2024, the following databases were searched: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus/Embase, Web of Sciences, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (including Cochrane), Cochrane Central Registrar of controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT. Retrieved articles were evaluated for eligibility and finally selected publications for risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Out of 811 publications identified by the search, only 5 fulfilled inclusion criteria of the SR. None of the studies fully answered our PICO question. The studies were overall of poor quality and the heterogeneity of the data did not allow us to perform meta-analysis, detailed statistical analysis or formal synthesis of data. Adverse events of post-operative medication were not described in any of the included studies. Existing guidelines of European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN), North American Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) were reviewed and paediatric therapy guide for pCD undergoing ICR was drafted with respect to recent SRs and meta-analyses in adult population and including scarce paediatric data identified by our SR. As pCD patients undergoing ICR are a high-risk population, they should not be left untreated post-operatively. Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs should be considered as first-line therapy in the majority of patients. Non-anti-TNF biologics should be considered in case of anti-TNF failure. Regular endoscopic monitoring starting at 6 months after the surgery and supported by regular F-CPT evaluation should be used to identify early endoscopic recurrence and to escalate the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our SR revealed that there is wide variability in treatment strategies in children, and high-quality data are generally lacking. At the moment, paediatric prophylaxis of POR should be guided by available adult evidence with respect to the high-risk nature of pCD. Extensive research in pCD should be encouraged.

Pharmacological treatment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: Protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition primarily affecting the digestive system. When dealing with complex cases like intestinal blockages or perforations, surgery becomes the primary treatment option. However, surgery doesn't offer a complete cure, and the possibility of recurrence remains. To manage CD recurrence after surgery, various treatment choices are available, including steroids, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators, and further surgery. Regrettably, the current body of evidence doesn't definitively establish which of these treatments is the most effective and safe. Thus, our research aims to provide insights into the Validity and security of different treatment approaches for managing CD recurrence after surgery.

METHODS

Search of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be conducted to include researches that examine the validity of treatments for recurrent CD after surgery. Our analysis will distinguish between two types of studies: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies with at least two different treatments, each evaluated separately. We will employ Bayesian network meta-analyses to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of these treatments. Additionally, subgroup analyses will be performed according to recurrence status and postoperative prophylactic medication. To clarify the variation of studies, sensitivity analyses will be performed. And we may use meta-regression as an additional approach if relevant data are available. We will also rigorously access the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.

DISCUSSION

This analysis will provide a comprehensive assessment of the latest evidence on available treatments for patients with postoperative recurrence of CD, which will provide recommendations for clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Systematic review registration INPLASY2023110021. (DOI: 10.37766/inplasy2023.11.0021).

Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.

Azathioprine Plus Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Versus Azathioprine Monotherapy for the Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence in Patients with Crohn's Disease: An Open-Label, Single-Centre, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine [AZA] effectively prevents postoperative endoscopic recurrence [ER] in Crohn's disease [CD]. However, the efficacy of AZA emerges after 3 months. Exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] can maintain remission in CD. The present trial investigates whether AZA plus postoperative 3-month EEN is superior to AZA alone in preventing ER of CD.

METHODS

In total, 84 high-risk CD patients undergoing intestinal resection received AZA alone or AZA plus 3 months of EEN [AZA + EEN] postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the rate of ER at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included the rate of ER at 3 months, clinical recurrence [CR], CD activity index [CDAI] scores, faecal calprotectin [FC], and C-reactive protein [CRP]. Quality of life was assessed using Short Form-36 [SF-36] and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ].

RESULTS

Patients in the AZA + EEN group exhibited significantly lower rates of ER compared to the AZA group at both 12 months (33.3% [13/39] vs 63.2% [24/38], P = 0.009) and 3 months (8.6% [3/35] vs 28.1% [9/32], P = 0.037) post-surgery. The rates of CR between the two groups at 3 and 12 months were similar. CDAI scores, FC, albumin level, and CRP were all comparable between the two groups. Quality of life was significantly higher in the AZA group than in the AZA + EEN group at 3 months but became comparable from 5 to 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk CD patients, combining AZA with postoperative 3-month EEN reduces 1-year ER but may temporarily impact quality of life. Further large-scale, long-term studies are warranted.

TRIAL NUMBER

NCT05214430.

Systematic review: Patient-related, microbial, surgical, and histopathological risk factors for endoscopic post-operative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for endoscopic post-operative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) is required to identify patients who would benefit most from initiation of prophylactic medication and intensive monitoring of recurrence.

AIMS

To assess the current evidence on patient-related, microbial, surgical and histopathological risk factors for ePOR in patients with CD after ileocolic (re-)resection.

METHODS

Multiple online databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched up to March 2024. Studies with reported associations of patient-related, microbial, surgical and/or histopathological factors for ePOR (i.e., Rutgeerts' score ≥i2 or modified Rutgeerts' score ≥i2a) were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational cohort studies and case-control studies.

RESULTS

In total, 47 studies were included (four RCTs, 29 cohort studies, 12 case-control studies, one cross-sectional study and one individual participant data meta-analysis) including 6006 patients (median sample size 87 patients [interquartile range 46-170]). Risk of bias assessment revealed a poor quality in 41% of the studies. An association was reported in multiple studies of ePOR with active smoking at and post-surgery, male sex and prior bowel resection. A heterogeneous association with ePOR was reported for other risk factors included in the current guidelines (penetrating disease, perianal disease, younger age, extensive small bowel disease and presence of granulomas in the resection specimen or myenteric plexitis in the resection margin), and other patient-related, microbial, surgical and histopathological factors.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for ePOR in international guidelines are not consistently reported as risk factors in current literature except for active smoking and prior bowel resection. To develop evidence-based, personalised strategies, large prospective studies are warranted to identify risk factors for ePOR. Validation studies of promising (bio)markers are also required.

Postoperative small bowel Crohn's disease: how to diagnose, manage and treat

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Crohn's disease is a relapsing inflammatory condition and disease recurrence after surgery is common. Significant variation in clinical practice remains despite progress in management of postoperative Crohn's disease. In this review, we summarise current management strategies and guidelines, unmet needs, and research progress in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been real progress in risk stratifying individuals' postsurgery and tailoring therapies based on their risk; this has been incorporated into current management guidelines in the USA, UK, and Europe. Furthermore, novel noninvasive monitoring tools such as intestinal ultrasound have shown high sensitivity and specificity at detecting disease recurrence and are an attractive point-of-care test. Recent studies are also investigating multiomic biomarkers to prognosticate postoperative Crohn's disease. However, given the heterogeneity within this condition, large multicentre clinical validation across all age groups is needed for clinical translation in the future.

SUMMARY

Ongoing progress in research and the development of novel prognostic and noninvasive disease monitoring tools offers hope for personalised therapy tailored to individual recurrence risk in postoperative Crohn's disease.

Management of Post-Operative Crohn's Disease: Knowns and Unknowns

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by relapsing-remission phases. CD often requires surgical intervention during its course, mainly ileo-cecal/ileo-colonic resection. However, surgery in CD is not curative and post-operative recurrence (POR) can happen. The management of CD after surgery presents challenges. Ensuring timely, effective, and safe therapy to prevent POR is essential but difficult, considering that approximately 20-30% of subjects may not experience endoscopic POR and that 40-50% will only exhibit intermediate lesions, which carry a low risk of mid- and long-term clinical and surgical POR. Currently, there are two accepted intervention strategies: early post-operative prophylactic therapy (systematically or based on the patient's risk of recurrence) or starting therapy after confirming endoscopic POR 6-12 months after surgery (endoscopy-driven prophylactic therapy). The risk of overtreatment lies in exposing patients to undesired adverse events, along with the costs associated with medications. Conversely, undertreatment may lead to missed opportunities to prevent bowel damage and the necessity for additional surgery. This article aims to perform a comprehensive review regarding the optimal strategy to reduce the risk of POR in CD patients and the current therapeutic options.

Clinical Update on the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease Recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in therapeutics, a significant portion of patients with Crohn's disease still require surgical management. In this article, we present updates to the natural history, prognostication and postoperative monitoring, and novel therapeutics in the prevention and treatment of postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical risk factors have been associated with higher rates of postoperative recurrence (POR), and in recent studies demonstrate an increased cumulative risk with presence of additional risk factors. Additional novel clinical, histologic, and "-omic" risk factors for recurrence have recently been elucidated, including the role of the mesentery on recurrence and perioperative intraabdominal septic complications. High-risk patients benefit most from medical prophylaxis, including anti-TNF with or without immunomodulator therapy to prevent recurrence. New biologics such as vedolizumab and ustekinumab have emerging evidence in the use of prophylaxis, especially with recent REPREVIO trial data. Non-invasive disease monitoring, such as cross-sectional enterography, intestinal ultrasound, and fecal calprotectin, have been validated against ileocolonoscopy. Recent advances in the prediction, prevention, and monitoring algorithms of postoperative Crohn's disease may be leading to a reduction in postoperative recurrence. Ongoing trials will help determine optimal monitoring and management strategies for this at-risk population.

The Management of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with different phenotypes of presentation, inflammatory, penetrating, or stricturing disease, that significantly impacts patient well-being and quality of life. Despite advances in medical therapy, surgery sometimes represents the only treatment to address complications, such as strictures, fistulas, or abscesses. Minimizing postoperative recurrence (POR) remains a major challenge for both clinicians and patients; consequently, various therapeutic strategies have been developed to prevent or delay POR. The current review outlines an updated overview of POR management. We focused on diagnostic assessment, which included endoscopic examination, biochemical analyses, and cross-sectional imaging techniques, all crucial tools used to accurately diagnose this condition. Additionally, we delved into the associated risk factors contributing to POR development. Furthermore, we examined recent advances in the prophylaxis and treatment of POR in CD.

A TNF-α blocking peptide that reduces NF-κB and MAPK activity for attenuating inflammation

Overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is implicated in many inflammatory diseases, including septic shock, hepatitis, asthma, insulin resistance and autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease. The TNF-α signaling pathway is a valuable target, and anti-TNF-α drugs are successfully used to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Here, we study anti-inflammatory activity of an anti-TNF-α peptide (SN1-13, DEFHLELHLYQSW). In the cellular level assessment, SN1-13 inhibited TNF-α-induced cytotoxicity and blocks TNF-α-triggered signaling activities (IC50 = 15.40 μM). Moreover, the potential binding model between SN1-13 and TNF-α/TNFRs conducted through molecular docking revealed that SN1-13 could stunt TNF-α mediated signaling thought blocking TNF-α and its receptor TNFR1 and TNFR2. These results suggest that SN1-13 would be a potential lead peptide to treat TNF-α-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Anti-TNF Agents and New Biological Agents (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence After Surgery in Crohn's Disease

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative, as postoperative recurrence (POR) after ileocolonic resection is the rule in the absence of prophylactic treatment. In the present article, we critically review available data on the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and new biologics (including vedolizumab and ustekinumab) in the prevention and treatment of POR after surgery in CD. Several studies (summarised in various meta-analyses) have confirmed the efficacy of anti-TNFs in the prevention of POR. We identified 37 studies, including 1863 CD patients, with mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 29%. Only few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared thiopurines and anti-TNFs, with controversial results, although the superiority of the latter is supported by several meta-analyses. Infliximab and adalimumab seem equally effective. The combination of anti-TNFs and immunosuppressives should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNFs. Several studies have shown that anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. In fact, the use of the same anti-TNF before and after surgery might be effective for the prevention of POR. Prophylactic anti-TNF treatment, once started, should be continued long term. Anti-TNFs are also effective for the treatment of established POR. Retreatment with anti-TNFs for POR is a valid strategy even after their preoperative failure. In six studies (including 156 patients) evaluating vedolizumab, mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months was 41%. The non-randomised comparison of anti-TNFs and vedolizumab has provided controversial results. One placebo-controlled RCT confirmed that vedolizumab is quite effective in preventing POR in CD patients with increased risk of recurrence. Seven studies (including 162 patients) evaluated ustekinumab, with a mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 41%. The comparative efficacy of ustekinumab and anti-TNFs is still unclear. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab seem to be equally effective, although the experience is very limited. In conclusion, to date, anti-TNFs are the most effective agents in preventing and treating POR in CD. Anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. Vedolizumab seems to be quite effective in the prevention of POR in patients with increased risk of recurrence. Ustekinumab is probably also effective in the postoperative setting, although the comparative efficacy with anti-TNFs or vedolizumab is still unclear.

Postoperative Crohn's Disease

Although surgery rates in Crohn's disease are declining in the past twenty years, bowel resection remains an important and still commonly used therapeutic option in Crohn's disease. Preoperatively, patients clinical status must be optimized including preparation for perioperative recovery including with nutrition optimization and preparation for postoperative pharmacotherapy. Postoperatively a medical therapy is often required and in recent years it has often been a biological therapy. One randomized controlled study suggested that infliximab is more likely to prevent endoscopic recurrence than placebo. But other biologicals have been used as well. Ileocolonoscopy should be undertaken by 6 months after an ileal or ileocecal resection especially. Adjunctive imaging such as transabdominal ultrasound, capsule endoscopy or cross sectional imaging may be required. Biomarker measurement with fecal calprotectin especially, or C-reactive protein, serum ferritin, serum albumin and serum hemoglobin will also be helpful.

Prioritization in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most guidelines for IBD still recommend step-by-step therapy with initially classic drugs such aminosalicylates (in ulcerative colitis) or steroids but avoid prioritizing certain biological drugs and JAK inhibitors in the complicated course. This review provides an aid to pending therapy decisions.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we analyze the evidence for Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis in order to optimize and 'personalize' the choice of therapy, especially in difficult cases. The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a continuous literature review with the key words 'Crohn´s disease' and 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

Based on this complex data set following standard therapies steroid-refractory Crohn´s disease should preferentially be treated with combined infliximab plus azathioprine or risankizumab, in second line after their failure with ustekinumab or 7adalimumab. In steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis infliximab plus azathioprine or upadacitinib should be preferred in first line, filgotinib, tofacitinib or ustekinumab in second line. A steroid-dependent course in both diseases requires azathioprine or vedolizumab, in second line infliximab or Janus kinase inhibitors. The conclusions drawn from these complex data may be helpful for individual decision making in daily clinical practice.

How many biomarker measurements are needed to predict prognosis in Crohn's disease patients under infliximab?-A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Timely stratification of Crohn's disease (CD) is essential for patients' management. The use of noninvasive accurate biomarkers is key to monitor treatment and to pursue mucosal healing, the ultimate treatment endpoint in CD.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the performance of readily available biomarkers and develop risk matrices to predict CD progression.

METHODS

Data from 289 CD patients receiving infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy for 2 years was collected; those patients were included in DIRECT, a prospective multicenter observational study. Disease progression was evaluated using two composite outcomes incorporating clinical and drug-related factors, the first including IFX dose and/or frequency adjustments. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and to develop risk matrices.

RESULTS

The isolated presence of anemia at least once during follow-up was a significant predictor of disease progression (OR 2.436 and 3.396 [p ≤ 0.001] for composite outcomes 1 and 2, respectively) regardless of confounding factors. Isolated highly elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; >10.0 mg/L) and fecal calprotectin (FC; >500.0 μg/g) in at least one visit were also significant predictors, while milder elevations (3.1-10.0 mg/L and 250.1-500.0 μg/g) were only relevant when detected in at least two visits (consecutive or not). The combination of biomarkers in risk matrices had good ability to predict progression; patients simultaneously presenting anemia, highly elevated CRP and FC at least once had 42%-63% probability of achieving the composite outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The combined evaluation of hemoglobin, CRP, and FC in at least one time point and their incorporation into risk matrices seems to be the optimal strategy for CD management, as data from additional visits did not meaningfully influence the predictions and may delay decision-making.

Personalize, participate, predict, and prevent: 4Ps in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a complex, immune-mediated, disorder which leads to several gastrointestinal and systemic manifestations determining a poor quality of life, disability, and other negative health outcomes. Our knowledge of this condition has greatly improved over the last few decades, and a comprehensive management should take into account both biological (i.e., disease-related, patient-related) and non-biological (i.e., socioeconomic, cultural, environmental, behavioral) factors which contribute to the disease phenotype. From this point of view, the so called 4P medicine framework, including personalization, prediction, prevention, and participation could be useful for tailoring ad hoc interventions in IBD patients. In this review, we discuss the cutting-edge issues regarding personalization in special settings (i.e., pregnancy, oncology, infectious diseases), patient participation (i.e., how to communicate, disability, tackling stigma and resilience, quality of care), disease prediction (i.e., faecal markers, response to treatments), and prevention (i.e., dysplasia through endoscopy, infections through vaccinations, and post-surgical recurrence). Finally, we provide an outlook discussing the unmet needs for implementing this conceptual framework in clinical practice.

Comparison of two strategies for the management of postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease patients with one clinical risk factor: A multicentre IG-IBD study

BACKGROUND

The management of postoperative recurrence (POR) in Crohn's disease (CD) after ileo-colonic resection is a highly debated topic. Prophylactic immunosuppression after surgery is currently recommended in the presence of at least one clinical risk factor.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine whether early immunosuppression can be avoided and guided by endoscopy in CD patients with only one risk factor.

METHODS

CD patients with only one risk factor for POR, including previous intestinal resection, extensive small intestine resection (>50 cm), fistulising phenotype, history of perianal disease, and active smoking, were retrospectively included. Two groups were formed based on whether immunosuppression was started immediately after surgery ("prophylaxis group") or guided by endoscopy ("endoscopy-driven group"). Primary endpoints were rates of any endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts ≥ i2a) and severe endoscopic recurrence (i4) within 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were clinical recurrence rates at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were enroled, of whom 61 (31.3%) received immunoprophylaxis. No differences between immunoprophylaxis and the endoscopy-driven approach were found regarding any endoscopic recurrence (36.1% vs. 45.5%, respectively, p = 0.10) and severe endoscopic recurrence (9.8% vs. 15.7%, respectively, p = 0.15) at the first endoscopic evaluation. Clinical recurrence rates were also not statistically different (p = 0.43, p = 0.09, and p = 0.63 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In operated CD patients with only one risk factor for POR, immediate immunoprophylaxis does not decrease the rate of early clinical and endoscopic recurrence. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease patients with isolated anastomotic lesions

Background

Patients with isolated anastomotic lesions (iAL) are common in postoperative Crohn's disease (CD) and have heterogeneous prognosis.

Objectives

To investigate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in CD patients with iAL.

Design

A bicenter retrospective cohort study.

Methods

CD patients who received ileocolonic resection from 2013 and 2020 and had a modified Rutgeerts score of i2a were recruited. NLR was determined within 1 week around the initial endoscopy after ileocolectomy. The primary outcome was clinical recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazard regression analysis were utilized to assess the association between candidate variables and outcomes of interest.

Results

In total, 411 postoperative CD patients were preliminarily reviewed and 83 patients were eligible. In total, 36 (48.6%) patients experienced clinical recurrence with a median follow-up time of 16.3 (interquartile range, 9.7-26.3) months. NLR > 2.45 and age at surgery >45 years had higher cumulative incidence of clinical recurrence in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. After adjusted for potential confounders, NLR > 2.45 was the only independent risk factor for clinical recurrence, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39-6.00; p = 0.005]. Furthermore, a risk score based on NLR and age at surgery were built to further stratify patients. Compared to those who scored 0, patients with a score of 1 and 2 had an adjusted HR of 2.48 (95% CI, 1.22-5.02) and 6.97 (95% CI, 2.19-22.16) for developing clinical recurrence, respectively.

Conclusions

NLR is a promising prognostic biomarker for CD patients with iAL. The utilization of NLR and the risk score to stratify patients may facilitate the personalized management in patients with iAL.

Post-operative prevention and monitoring of Crohn's disease recurrence

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are relapsing and remitting chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Although surgery for UC can provide a cure, surgery for CD is rarely curative. In the past few decades, research has identified risk factors for postsurgical CD recurrence, enabling patient risk stratification to guide monitoring and prophylactic treatment to prevent CD recurrence. A MEDLINE literature review identified articles regarding post-operative monitoring of CD recurrence after resection surgery. In this review, we discuss the evidence on risk factors for post-operative CD recurrence as well as suggestions on post-operative management.

Contemporary Management of Postoperative Crohn's Disease after Ileocolonic Resection

Surgery remains an important treatment modality in the multidisciplinary management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). To illustrate the recent advances in the management of postoperative CD we outline the contemporary approach to treatment: diagnosing disease recurrence using endoscopy or noninvasive methods and risk stratification underlying decisions to institute treatment. Endoscopic scoring indices are being refined to guide treatment decisions by accurately estimating the risk of recurrence based on endoscopic appearance. The original Rutgeerts score has been modified to separate anastomotic lesions from lesions in the neoterminal ileum. Two further indices, the REMIND score and the POCER index, were recently developed with the same intention. Noninvasive monitoring for recurrence using a method with high negative predictive value has the potential to simplify management algorithms and only perform ileocolonoscopy in a subset of patients. Fecal calprotectin, intestinal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance enterography are all being evaluated for this purpose. The use of infliximab for the prevention of postoperative recurrence is well supported by data, but management decisions are fraught with uncertainty for patients with previous exposure to biologics. Data on the use of ustekinumab and vedolizumab for postoperative CD are emerging, but controlled studies are lacking.