AGA Rapid Clinical Practice Update on the Management of Patients Taking GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Prior to Endoscopy: Communication

Ultrasound assessment of preoperative gastric volume in fasted diabetic surgical patients: A prospective observational cohort study on the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists on gastric emptying

BACKGROUND

Preoperative gastric ultrasound allows non-invasive qualitative and quantitative assessment of gastric contents aiding in preoperative risk assessment. We hypothesized that appropriately fasted diabetic surgical patients taking GLP-1 agonists would have higher gastric volumes than those not taking GLP-1 agonists.

METHODS

This prospective, observational cohort study enrolled diabetic patients undergoing elective surgery, comparing those taking (n = 106) and not taking (n = 100) GLP-1 agonists. The primary outcome was gastric volume assessed via gastric ultrasound in the right lateral decubitus position. Secondary outcomes included presence of a full stomach (solids/thick liquids or greater than 1.5 mL/kg clear liquid), need for surgery delay, Perlas grade, and occurrence of intraoperative aspiration. The impact of GLP-1 agonist type, duration of use, and timing of last dose on gastric volume was also examined.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients on GLP-1 agonists had significantly higher median gastric volumes compared to patients not on GLP-1 agonists (0.61 mL/kg vs 0.16 mL/kg, P < 0.001) and increased odds of a full stomach (OR 11.3, 95 % CI 5.2-24.7, P < 0.0001). GLP-1 agonist use correlated with higher Perlas grades (P < 0.001). Gastric volumes were significantly higher with GLP-1 agonist use within 7 days of surgery relative to use within 7-14 days or more than 14 days from surgery (P < 0.001 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 agonist therapy was associated with higher residual gastric volumes and higher risks of full stomachs in fasted diabetic patients. GLP-1 agonist use within 7 days of surgery was also associated with higher gastric volumes relative to holding therapy for over 7 days, supporting current consensus-based guidelines.

Aspiration risk and strategic approach for patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgery

Perioperative management of patients receiving a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) remains challenging for the anesthesiologist. Despite the approval of GLP-1 RAs 2 decades ago, the recent reports of aspiration and postoperative pulmonary complications drew attention to this group of medications and resulted in multiple societal guidelines that would provide recommendations for anesthesiologists and proceduralists on the appropriate perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs. However, despite these guidelines and proposed options, there was a lack of adequate evidence to support holding versus continuing the medication, as well as data related to the role of gastric ultrasound in that decision-making process. The release of multiple societal guidelines and studies evaluating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative outcomes resulted in more controversy and uncertainty for the clinician anesthesiologist to follow. The ultimate goal for perioperative management of these medications is to evaluate an individual patient's risk of aspiration, rather than assuming the risk is low when holding the medication appropriately or high if not holding it. Furthermore, it is unclear whether holding these types of medicines or unnecessary postponing of surgery may result in adverse outcomes. In this narrative review, we present a summary of the existing literature on the topic with a focus on the risk of aspiration and a recommendation for perioperative management to include the utilization of gastric ultrasound for surgery patients based on their risks.

Outcomes of retained gastrointestinal debris during upper endoscopy

Background and study aims

Gastrointestinal debris retention (GIDR) during endoscopy can result in aborted procedures, intubation, and aspiration. GIDR has increased significance with uptake of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use. Outcome analysis is vital to risk-stratify patients with GIDR during endoscopy. Our study evaluated the effect of GIDR on endoscopic complications.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopy between May 2016 and December 2021 with documented GIDR. The study included 138 patients with GIDR and 275 controls. Propensity score matching between patients with GIDR and controls was performed in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. T-tests and chi square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables.

Results

The GIDR group was younger and had lower BMI, with no difference in sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or use of monitored anesthesia care. GIDR was more frequently encountered when indications were abnormal imaging, pain, and pancreatico-biliary. Amount of GIDR was quantified as "large" in 37.7% of cases and size of debris was associated with rate of aborted procedures.

Conclusions

Our study did not demonstrate a significant increase in post-procedure complications in patients with GIDR. Further, the GIDR group had higher rates of opiate use, which can guide stratification of retention risk.

Association of semaglutide with retained gastric contents on endoscopy: Retrospective analysis

Background and study aims

We investigated the effect of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist therapy, on retained gastric contents during endoscopy through a retrospective case-control study.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate the effect of semaglutide on rates of retained gastric contents (RGC) visualized during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Cases and controls were matched using multidimensional propensity score matching: age, gender, body mass index, and EGD indication. Pairs were analyzed using McNemar testing and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests.

Results

Of the patients on GLP-1 therapy at time of EGD, 12.5% had RGC, compared with 1.3% in the control group (confidence interval [CI] 7.2% to 17.7%, P < 0.0001). Approximately 23% of patients prescribed GLP-1 therapy for weight loss had RGC at time of EGD compared with the control group (CI 13.4% to 32.6%, P < 0.0001). Only 2.6% of patients prescribed GLP-1 therapy for diabetes had RGC at time of EGD compared with the control group (CI -0.9% to 6.1%, P = 0.5). Patients receiving GLP-1 therapy with RGC at time of EGD did not differ from non-RGC patients in dosing of GLP-1 agonist ( P = 0.23) or duration of GLP-1 agonist use prior to EGD ( P = 0.98).

Conclusions

Semaglutide use appears to increase risk of having retained gastric contents visualized during endoscopy. Patients on semaglutide for weight loss appear to have a greater risk of RGC compared with patients on semaglutide for glycemic control. This observation may have clinical implications for management of GLP-1 agonist use prior to endoscopy.

Comparing the risk of gastroparesis following different modalities for treating obesity: semaglutide versus bupropion-naltrexone versus sleeve gastrectomy - a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists has been associated with gastroparesis, but little is known about the risk of gastroparesis in those with obesity but without type 2 diabetes (T2D), and how that risk compares with other treatment modalities for obesity. This study aims to characterise the relationship between different treatment modalities for obesity and the risk of gastroparesis in a population without pre-existing T2D.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using Merative MarketScan Research Databases of individuals with obesity who underwent treatment with semaglutide, bupropion-naltrexone or sleeve gastrectomy from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. The incidence of gastroparesis diagnosis was evaluated using International Classification of Diseases, Version 10 codes. The risk of gastroparesis was compared between three intervention groups using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 55 460 individuals included, 36 990 (66.7%) were treated with semaglutide, 7369 (13.3%) with bupropion-naltrexone and 11 101 (13.7%) with sleeve gastrectomy. Gastroparesis rates among those treated with semaglutide versus bupropion-naltrexone versus sleeve gastrectomy were 6.5 per 1000 person-years (PY) vs 2.1 per 1000 PY vs 1.1 per 1000 PY, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, individuals treated with semaglutide had a higher risk of gastroparesis than those treated with bupropion-naltrexone (adjusted HR 3.33, 95% CI 2.27, 4.98) and sleeve gastrectomy (adjusted HR 6.14, 95% CI 3.94, 9.57).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased incidence of gastroparesis among individuals with obesity without T2D who are using semaglutide as compared with bupropion-naltrexone and sleeve gastrectomy. Understanding these potential side effects, though rare, may help guide personalised treatment regimens.

Optimizing bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy: consensus recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

This document is an update to the 2014 recommendations for optimizing the adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The US Multi-Society Task Force developed consensus statements and key clinical concepts addressing important aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The majority of consensus statements focus on individuals at average risk for inadequate bowel preparation. However, statements addressing individuals at risk for inadequate bowel preparation quality are also provided. The quality of a bowel preparation is defined as adequate when standard screening or surveillance intervals can be assigned based on the findings of the colonoscopy. We recommend the use of a split-dose bowel preparation regimen and suggest that a 2 L regimen may be sufficient. A same-day regimen is recommended as an acceptable alternative for individuals undergoing afternoon colonoscopy, but we suggest that a same-day regimen is an inferior alternative for individuals undergoing morning colonoscopy. We recommend limiting dietary restrictions to the day before a colonoscopy, relying on either clear liquids or low-fiber/low-residue diets for the early and midday meals. We suggest the adjunctive use of oral simethicone for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Routine tracking of the rate of adequate bowel preparations at the level of individual endoscopists and at the level of the endoscopy unit is also recommended, with a target of >90% for both rates.

Optimizing Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: Consensus Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

This document is an update to the 2014 recommendations for optimizing the adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The US Multi-Society Task Force developed consensus statements and key clinical concepts addressing important aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The majority of consensus statements focus on individuals at average risk for inadequate bowel preparation. However, statements addressing individuals at risk for inadequate bowel preparation quality are also provided. The quality of a bowel preparation is defined as adequate when standard screening or surveillance intervals can be assigned based on the findings of the colonoscopy. We recommend the use of a split-dose bowel preparation regimen and suggest that a 2 L regimen may be sufficient. A same-day regimen is recommended as an acceptable alternative for individuals undergoing afternoon colonoscopy, but we suggest that a same-day regimen is an inferior alternative for individuals undergoing morning colonoscopy. We recommend limiting dietary restrictions to the day before a colonoscopy, relying on either clear liquids or low-fiber/low-residue diets for the early and midday meals. We suggest the adjunctive use of oral simethicone for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Routine tracking of the rate of adequate bowel preparations at the level of individual endoscopists and at the level of the endoscopy unit is also recommended, with a target of >90% for both rates.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Upper Endoscopy While on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Glucose-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have become integral to the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity. GLP-1RAs work in part through delaying gastric emptying, raising concerns about retained gastric contents (RGC) during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).1 The American Society of Anesthesiologists currently recommends holding GLP-1RAs for 1 dosing cycle before elective procedures, however, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) advocates proceeding with endoscopy in asymptomatic patients adhering to standard perioperative protocols without medication withholding and suggests implementing a liquid diet the day before endoscopy in lieu of stopping the medication.2,3 This variability in recommendations stems largely from a lack of GLP-1RA outcomes data from which to draw evidence-based conclusions.

Optimizing Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: Consensus Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

This document is an update to the 2014 recommendations for optimizing the adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, which represents the American College of Gastroenterology and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The US Multi-Society Task Force developed consensus statements and key clinical concepts addressing important aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The majority of consensus statements focus on individuals at average risk for inadequate bowel preparation. However, statements addressing individuals at risk for inadequate bowel preparation quality are also provided. The quality of a bowel preparation is defined as adequate when standard screening or surveillance intervals can be assigned based on the findings of the colonoscopy. We recommend the use of a split-dose bowel preparation regimen and suggest that a 2 L regimen may be sufficient. A same-day regimen is recommended as an acceptable alternative for individuals undergoing afternoon colonoscopy, but we suggest that a same-day regimen is an inferior alternative for individuals undergoing morning colonoscopy. We recommend limiting dietary restrictions to the day before a colonoscopy, relying on either clear liquids or low-fiber/low-residue diets for the early and midday meals. We suggest the adjunctive use of oral simethicone for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Routine tracking of the rate of adequate bowel preparations at the level of individual endoscopists and at the level of the endoscopy unit is also recommended, with a target of >90% for both rates.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Limited evidence exists regarding the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on upper endoscopy. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively review the available evidence on this subject.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was carried out until May 2024. Pooled estimates were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of retained gastric content (RGC), while secondary outcomes included rates of aborted and repeated procedures, adverse event rate, and rates of aspiration.

RESULTS

This analysis included 13 studies involving a total of 84,065 patients. Patients receiving GLP-1RA therapy exhibited significantly higher rates of RGC (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.35 to 9.23), a trend that was consistent among patients with diabetes (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.23 to 3.02). Adjusted analysis, accounting for variables such as sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, and other therapies, confirmed the elevated rates of RGC in the GLP-1RA user group (adjusted OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.42 to 5.15). Furthermore, rates of aborted and repeated procedures were higher in the GLP-1RA user group (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 3.01 to 8.75; and OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.35; respectively). However, no significant differences were found in AE and aspiration rates between the 2 groups (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 0.63 to 26.03; and OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 4.77; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Use of GLP-1RAs is associated with increased retention of gastric contents and more frequent aborted procedures during upper endoscopy. However, the adverse event and aspiration rates do not seem different; therefore, adjusting fasting time instead of routinely withholding GLP-1RAs could be reasonable in these patients.

Association of Perioperative Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Postoperative Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess rates of surgical complications and postoperative readmission in diabetic patients with and without active perioperative prescriptions for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medications.

BACKGROUND

With the rapid growth of GLP-1 RA use in the United States, it is important to understand the potential effect of these drugs on surgical outcomes broadly.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational cohort analysis, patients with a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes undergoing a surgical procedure at a multicenter quaternary-care health care system between February 2020 and July 2023 were included. Propensity score matching was performed between procedures in patients with and without an active GLP-1 RA prescription. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission, and secondary outcomes were documented dehiscence, infection, hematoma, and bleeding within 180 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Among 74,425 surgical procedures in 21,772 patients included in the analysis, 27.2% were performed in the setting of an active GLP-1 RA prescription. In 13,129 patients [48.0% men, 52.0% women; median (interquartile range) age, 67 (57, 75)], 35,020 procedures were propensity score matched. After matching, the active GLP-1 RA prescription group had a significantly reduced risk of 30-day readmission [relative risk (RR): 0.883; 95% CI: 0.789-0.987; P = 0.028; number needed to treat (NNT): 219; 95% CI: 191-257], postoperative wound dehiscence (RR: 0.711; 95% CI: 0.577-0.877; P = 0.001; NNT: 266; 95% CI: 202-391), and postoperative hematoma (RR: 0.440; 95% CI: 0.216-0.894; P = 0.023; NNT: 1786; 95% CI: 652-2416). No significant differences were seen in rates of infection and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

An active perioperative GLP-1 RA prescription in patients with diabetes was associated with significant reductions in risk-adjusted readmission, wound dehiscence, and hematoma, and no difference in infection and bleeding rates. Further study is warranted to elucidate any causal association.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Do Not Increase Aspiration During Upper Endoscopy in Patients With Diabetes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have been associated with greater retention of gastric contents, however, there is minimal controlled, population-based data evaluating the potential adverse effects of GLP1-RA in the periprocedural setting. We aimed to determine if there is increased risk of aspiration and aspiration-related complications after upper endoscopy in patients using GLP1-RAs.

METHODS

We used a nationwide commercial administrative claims database to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 to 64 with type 2 diabetes who underwent outpatient upper endoscopy from 2005 to 2021. We identified 6,806,046 unique upper endoscopy procedures. We compared claims for aspiration and associated pulmonary adverse events in the 14 days after upper endoscopy between users of GLP1-RAs, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is), and chronic opioids. We adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, underlying respiratory disease, and gastroparesis.

RESULTS

We found that pulmonary adverse events after upper endoscopy are rare, ranging from 6 to 25 events per 10,000 procedures. When comparing GLP1-RAs with DPP4i, crude relative risks of aspiration (0.67; 95% CI, 0.25-1.75), aspiration pneumonia (0.95; 95% CI, 0.40-2.29), pneumonia (1.07; 95% CI, 0.62-1.86), or respiratory failure (0.75; 95% CI, 0.38-1.48) were not higher in patients prescribed a GLP1-RA. When comparing GLP1-RAs with opioids, crude relative risks were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15-1.16) for aspiration, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.24-1.52) for aspiration pneumonia, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.19-0.49) for pneumonia, and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.13-0.45) for respiratory failure. These results were consistent across several sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP1-RA use is not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary complications after upper endoscopy compared with DPP4i use in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists increase the risk of residual gastric content and pulmonary aspiration on upper endoscopy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are associated with increased residual gastric content (RGC); however, there is debate about their impact on RGC-related clinical outcomes, particularly aspiration.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies published up to January 4, 2025, comparing GLP1-RA with control groups (non-GLP1-RA) in patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest included the risk of RGC, pulmonary aspiration, interrupted and repeated endoscopic procedures, and delays in gastric transit time during capsule endoscopy. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies composed of a total of 1,253,498 subjects, were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the GLP1-RA group had a significantly increased risk of RGC (OR 4.86, 95 % CI 3.85-6.14; adjusted OR 5.24, 95 % CI 3.49-7.87), pulmonary aspiration (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 1.36-3.87), interrupted endoscopic procedures (OR 3.22, 95 % CI 1.65-6.29), repeated endoscopy (OR 2.16, 95 % CI 1.14-4.11), and delays in gastric transit time during capsule endoscopy (MD 45.51, 95 % CI 1.33-89.68).

CONCLUSIONS

GLP1-RA use increased the risk of RGC, pulmonary aspiration, interrupted and repeated endoscopy and gastric transit time, reducing the safety and completion of upper endoscopy.

Evidence Report on the Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are increasingly used worldwide for weight and hyperglycemia management. There is an ongoing debate on the presence of increased gastric residue, leading to complications such as aspiration and overall safety in patients receiving upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We aimed to study the effect of GLP-RAs on endoscopy outcomes. Methods: We conducted a detailed search of online databases to select the studies which provided details of the effects of GLP-RAs on patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were odds of retained gastric content (RGC), aspiration risk, and aborted and repeated procedures. A random effect model was used to calculate the pooled odds of outcomes with a 95% CI. We further calculated the pooled odds of predictive factors associated with an increased rate of retained gastric residues in the study population. Results: We included 12 studies with a total of 105,515 patients, of which 32,144 were on GLP-1 RAs and 73,273 were in the control group. A total of 234 (0.73%) aspiration events in GLP-RA users were noted compared to 257 (0.35%) events in the control group. No increased odds (1.26, 95% CI 0.86-1.87, I2 34%) of aspiration were found in GLP-1 users compared to the non-GLP-1 group. Patients on GLP-1 RA had increased RGC compared to the control group (OR 6.30, 95% CI 5.30-7.49, I2 0%). The pooled odds of aborted (OR 5.50, 95% CI 3.25-9.32, I2 0%) and repeated procedures (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.42-3.38, I2 0%) were significantly higher in GLP-1 RA users. Patients taking Tirazepatide had the highest percentage of RGC (18.9%), while exenatide users had the lowest rate (6.2%) of food retention. Patients undergoing concomitant colonoscopy were found to have significantly low pooled odds of RGC (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04-0.48). GLP-1 RAs use was independently associated with increased odds of RGC (3.91, 95% CI 3.21-4.62, I2 0%). The results were homogenous and stayed consistent in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Although the odds of RGC and aborted procedures are high in the GLP-1 RAs group compared to the control, no significant difference in the odds of aspiration was found between the two groups. Simple measures such as a clear liquid diet for 24 h, as routinely set for patients undergoing colonoscopy, may reduce the risk of retaining gastric residue in these patient populations.

Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists Use Before Endoscopy Is Associated With Low Retained Gastric Contents: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Analysis

INTRODUCTION

While ubiquity of glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) is rising, guidance from the gastroenterology societies and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) remains in conflict on recommendations regarding preoperative holding before endoscopy. The aim of this study was to address this by evaluating the effect of GLP1-RAs on gastric retention during upper endoscopy.

METHODS

This multicenter cross-sectional study included patients on confirmed GLP1-RAs receiving an endoscopy from 2021 to 2023. Demographics, prescribing practices, and procedure outcomes were captured. GLP1-RA management of preoperative holding was retroactively classified per ASA guidance. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors influencing retained gastric contents.

RESULTS

Of 815 patients, 70 (8.7%) had retained gastric contents on endoscopy of whom 65 (93%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Only 1 (1.4%) of these patients required unplanned intubation, and none had aspiration events. Those with GLP1-RA held per ASA guidance (406, 49.8%) were less likely to have retained contents (4.4% vs 12.7%, P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences to intubation (0% vs 2%, P = 0.53) or aborting procedure rates (28% vs 18%, P = 0.40) due to gastric retention. On multivariable analysis, likelihood of food retention increased 36% (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.60) for every 1% increase in hemoglobin A1C after adjusting for GLP1-RA type and preoperative medication hold.

DISCUSSION

In this multicenter study, very low rates of retained gastric contents were seen during endoscopy in patients on GLP1-RAs and most were in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our findings suggest an individualized approach rather than universal preoperative holding of medications before endoscopy.

Perioperative and periprocedural management of GLP-1 receptor-based agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors: narrative review and the STOP-GAP and STOP DKA-2 algorithms

The GLP-1 receptor-based agonists (GLP-1RAs) and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are major twenty first century breakthroughs in diabetes and obesity medicine but there are important safety considerations regarding the perioperative and periprocedural management of individuals who are treated with these agents. GLP-1RAs have been linked to an increased risk of retained gastric contents and pulmonary aspiration while SGLT2i can be associated with diabetic ketoacidosis. This manuscript provides a narrative review of the available evidence for perioperative and periprocedural risks in people prescribed GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i. The authors provide expert opinion-driven recommendations and algorithms on how to safely manage GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i under perioperative/periprocedural settings.

The pleiotropic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a review for gastroenterologists

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) or glucagon receptor agonists have emerged as promising agents to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Although the beneficial effects of GLP-1RAs on glycemic control and weight are well-established, clinicians may be unfamiliar with other potential benefits of this class.

AREAS COVERED

We examined the pleiotropic effects of GLP-1RAs and how they relate to gastroenterologists for MASLD/MASH treatment. Our narrative review of English articles included four GLP-1RAs (subcutaneous semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide), a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist (tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist (survodutide), MASLD/MASH, related disorders, clinical management, treatment outcomes and landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

In Phase I - III trials, GLP-1RAs are associated with clinically relevant hepatic improvements including MASH resolution, liver fat reduction, and preventing worsening fibrosis. Effects on cardiometabolic parameters align with type 2 diabetes/obesity Phase III data, comprising substantial improvements in glycemic, weight, and cardiovascular outcomes. Promising data also suggest benefits in common comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.GLP-1RAs represent a valuable pharmacotherapeutic option for gastroenterologists managing individuals with MASLD/MASH and cardiometabolic comorbid conditions.

Low Rates of Aborted Endoscopy Due to Gastric Food Retention in Patients on Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use has dramatically increased with expanded indications for weight loss. Delayed gastric emptying due to these medications can lead to residual food in the stomach, which can increase the risk of periprocedural aspiration during endoscopic procedures. The aim of this study is to document rates of gastric food retention and aspiration events during upper endoscopy in patients on GLP-1 RA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients who underwent upper endoscopic procedures at two hospitals during 2018-2023. Procedure abortion due to the presence of food was taken as primary study endpoint. The secondary endpoint was aspiration events in patients with food noted on endoscopy.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 32,275 total upper endoscopic procedures performed during the study period, 1179 procedures were performed in patients taking GLP-1 RAs (GLP-1 cohort). In total, 37 endoscopies (0.1%) were aborted due to retained gastric food; 7 patients (0.6%) in the GLP-1 cohort vs 30 patients (0.096%) in the non GLP-1 cohort (p < 0.01). There were no episodes of aspiration in patients with retained food.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large retrospective cohort, GLP-1 RA use did increase rates of gastric food retention during upper endoscopy, though the absolute risk was minimal. There were no aspiration events related to gastric food retention. Because of the small number of events, there were no clear modifiable risk factors for gastric food retention. This study supports the practice of individualized periprocedural management in patients on GLP-1 RA.

Rates of repeat EGD in nondiabetic adults with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescription: a retrospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Data on endoscopic outcomes in adults without diabetes who are taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are limited. Therefore, we compared repeat EGD in this population with those not taking GLP-1RAs using a retrospective matched case-control study.

METHODS

Using the TriNetX health research platform (Cambridge, Mass, USA), we analyzed adults with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m2 without diabetes who underwent diagnostic EGD. The study group included individuals with ≥3 GLP-1RA prescriptions and undergoing EGD ≥30 days after the initial GLP-1RA prescription. The control group included individuals who were never prescribed GLP-1RAs but had an EGD after the prescription of other weight loss medications. Outcomes were compared using the risk ratio (RR) in matched cohorts.

RESULTS

No significant difference in repeat EGD (5.4% vs 4.2%; RR, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], .95-1.71) or new diagnosis of gastroparesis (1.1% vs .6%; RR; 2.00; 95% CI, .94-4.27) was noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs may not substantially increase the risk of repeat endoscopy in individuals without diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists significantly affect the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) affect gastrointestinal motility, slowing gastric emptying and colonic transit. GLP-1RAs have an impact on gastric residue before endoscopy, but only limited data are available regarding its effect on the adequacy of colonic preparation. We investigated the association between GLP-1RA use and inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) for colonoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study with GLP-1RA cases matched with controls (using propensity scores for age, sex, diabetes mellitus [DM], obesity, and co-morbidities). Data on demographics, medication use, procedural indications, and colonoscopy findings were collected. IBP ("poor preparation" on Aronchik scale or Boston Bowel preparation scale <5) was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

4876 patients treated with GLP-1RAs were included in the analysis and compared with 4876 controls selected from 333 648 patients without GLP-1RA use. Among the GLP-1RA patients, 10% (n = 487) had IBP compared with 197 (4%) of the control group (P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a higher rate of IBP among diabetic patients treated with GLP-1RA (284/2364 [12%]) than among diabetic patients without GLP-1RA treatment (118/2364 [5%]; P<0.001). Additionally, 203/2512 nondiabetic patients treated with GLP-1RAs had IBP (8%) compared with 79 of the nondiabetic non-GLP-1RA group (3%; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, diabetes and GLP-1RA use were both found to be independent risk factors for IBP (odds ratio [OR] 1.4 and OR 2.7, respectively; both P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the necessity for special attention and tailored recommendations for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with GLP-1RAs in terms of colonic preparation prior to colonoscopy.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and upper endoscopy: a real-world experience

OBJECTIVE

Increased use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has raised safety concerns during endoscopy due to their mechanism of delaying gastric emptying. This study aims to evaluate the impact of GLP-1RAs on technical success and safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of bariatric patients who underwent EGD between January 2022 and December 2023. Only patients on GLP-1RAs were included and were categorized into those who held GLP-1RAs prior to EGD (GLP-HELD group) and those who did not (GLP-CONTINUED group). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as completion of EGD without interruption. Secondary outcomes included the presence of residual gastric contents during EGD and aspiration rates.

RESULTS

A total of 629 patients were included. Baseline age and BMI were mean (SD) 54.9 (13.0) years and 37.3 (8.0) kg/m2, respectively. Of 629 patients, 146 (23%) were in the GLP-HELD group, and 483 (77%) were in the GLP-CONTINUED group. For the primary outcome, rates of early termination of EGD were similar between groups (1.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 0% for GLP-HELD; p = 0.36). For secondary outcomes, incidence of residual gastric contents was similar between groups (6.4% for GLP-CONTINUED vs. 2.7% for GLP-HELD; p = 0.09). There were no aspiration events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation of GLP-1RAs did not appear to be associated with an increased incidence of residual gastric contents, early procedural termination, or aspiration events.

The Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists in Acute Cholecystitis After a Routine Colonoscopy: A Case Report

Colonoscopy (CLN) is a common procedure for colon cancer screening and diagnosing various conditions. Acute cholecystitis (AC), though rare, has been reported as a complication. We present a 66-year-old female on semaglutide for obesity who developed AC within 72 hours post-CLN. Considering the increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and their impact on gallbladder motility, these medications may contribute to this complication. Future research is crucial to investigate whether a washout period for GLP-1 agonists before CLN is needed to reduce the risk of AC, if such a risk exists.

Variability in the management of GLP-1 agonists and endoscopic procedures: an opportunity for standardization

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), also known as incretin mimetics, have significantly revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity worldwide, far exceeding initial expectations regarding their global prescription. This class of medications has demonstrated weight losses of up to 20 % of baseline body weight. Beyond their proven benefits in T2DM and obesity, GLP-1RAs, as well as dual and triple agonists (GLP-1/GIP/glucagon), are being investigated for their effects on conditions such as metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, various cardiovascular disorders, neurocognitive impairments, and certain addictions. These emerging effects appear to be linked not only to their metabolic action but also to their ability to modulate the chronic inflammatory state underlying these pathologies.

Perioperative Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Procedures: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapies are increasingly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Despite growing awareness of potentially increased risk of pulmonary aspiration due to delayed gastric emptying, the risks and benefits of their perioperative use in patients undergoing cardiac procedures remains unexplored. A scoping review was performed to investigate the perioperative GLP-1RA use in patients undergoing cardiac procedures and recommendations.

METHOD

PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched up to April 2024 to identify English-language studies on the perioperative use of weekly and daily dosed GLP-1RAs in adult patients undergoing cardiac procedures (including cardiac surgery, trans-oesophageal echocardiograms, and cardiac catheterisation procedures).

RESULTS

Three studies were identified, which investigated daily dosed GLP-1RAs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. No studies were found investigating GLP-1RA use in cardiac catheterisation or trans-oesophageal echocardiograms procedures, and none which specifically examined risk of pulmonary aspiration in patients using GLP-1RAs undergoing cardiac procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RAs are beneficial for perioperative weight loss, glycaemic control, and cardiovascular health. Existing guidelines and consensus recommendations are highly contradictory on perioperative GLP-1RA management. Although no known published case reports exist to date of pulmonary aspiration in patients using GLP-1RAs undergoing cardiac procedures, non-cardiac surgical literature strongly suggests that patients are at theoretical risk and a cautious approach is advised in the absence of robust evidence informing recommendations for optimal withholding periods.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and capsule endoscopy in patients with diabetes: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is valuable for assessing conditions like GI bleeding, anemia, and inflammatory bowel disease. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are prescribed for diabetes and weight loss, with their pharmacologic effects including delayed gastric emptying. This study investigates the impact of GLP-1RA use on VCE outcomes in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study involves patients with diabetes undergoing VCE while on GLP-1RAs matched in a 1:1 ratio with control subjects, who are not on GLP-1RAs, based on demographics and diabetes-related factors. The primary outcome was gastric transit time in VCE studies, whereas secondary outcomes were incomplete small-bowel evaluation and small-bowel transit time.

RESULTS

In the GLP-1RA cohort with 68 patients, 5 (7%) experienced failure to pass the video capsule through the stomach; all control subjects passed the video capsule successfully (P = .06). GLP-1RA patients had a longer gastric transit time (99.3 ± 134.2 minutes) compared with control subjects (25.3 ± 31.6 minutes, P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed GLP-1RA use was associated with an increased gastric transit time by 74.5 minutes (95% confidence interval, 33.8-115.2; P < .001) compared with control subjects, after adjusting for relevant factors. Sixteen GLP-1RA patients (23.5%) experienced incomplete passage of the video capsule through the small intestine, a significantly higher rate compared with 3 patients in the control group (4.4%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RA use is associated with a prolonged gastric transit time and a higher rate of incomplete small-bowel evaluation during VCE. Future studies may be crucial for evaluating strategies to mitigate these effects.

Overview of diabetes agents in cardiovascular disease: it takes an orchestra to play Tchaikovsky in symphony

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to discuss the use and concerns of diabetes agents, clinical targets, and key aspects to be considered in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and at high risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent European and American guidelines recommended SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists as the preferred first-line diabetes agents in patients with T2DM and CVD. This is a paradigm shift from using metformin as first-line therapy. Amid their widespread use, however, there are also concerns about their side effects. With the rapidly growing diabetes regimens available, questions arise about how best to approach the management of patients with T2DM and CVD.

SUMMARY

To reduce CVD morbidity and mortality in patients with T2DM and at high or very high risk for CVD, the two key diabetes agents SGLT2i and/or GLP1-based therapies should be offered. Although lacking cardiovascular benefit, other diabetes agents remain necessary for many patients with T2DM for their glucocentric effects; Metformin and pioglitazone are useful in severe insulin resistance, while insulin therapy is often necessary in advanced diabetes; GLP1-RA is cautioned in patients with active gastrointestinal and mental health conditions, while DPP4 inhibitor is likely a well tolerated option in a challenging psychosocial setting. Other important aspects that should be considered include obesity, chronic kidney disease, women's cardiovascular health, and psychosocial factors.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on endoscopy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are known to cause delayed gastric emptying; however, the effect on clinical outcomes during upper endoscopy and colonoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the data.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for studies evaluating GLP-1RAs versus a control group (no GLP-1RAs) in patients undergoing endoscopy. The outcomes of interest were rate of retained gastric contents (RGCs), aborted procedures, aspiration events, and subjective bowel preparation quality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 77,152 patients (4449 in the GLP-1RA arm and 72,703 in the control arm) were included. Mean patient age ranged from 47.6 to 72 years, and 58.4% were women. As compared with the control group, the GLP-1RA group had higher odds of RGCs (OR, 15.39; 95% CI, 4.65-50.99; P < .01) and aborted procedures (OR, 13.86; 95% CI, 4.42-43.43; P < .01). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of aspiration events (OR, 21.06; 95% CI, .13-3379.01; P = .24) and subjective bowel preparation quality (OR, .94; 95% CI, .67-1.31; P = .83).

CONCLUSIONS

Although statistical significance was reached in terms of visible RGCs and early termination of endoscopies in patients on GLP-1RAs, these events were overall rare. GLP-1RAs do not appear to pose significant risk, as the odds of developing aspiration were comparable in the 2 groups.

GLP-1 receptor agonist use does not increase risk of respiratory complications post-endoscopy

Background and study aims

Data on respiratory complications associated with GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use before endoscopic procedures are limited.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX in adults with diabetes or obesity on GLP-1 RAs within 3 months of endoscopy, comparing them with non-GLP-1 RA users. Propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess outcomes.

Results

Among 46,948 patients, no significant differences in post-endoscopy aspiration pneumonitis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.56) or pneumonia (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.24) were found between groups.

Conclusions

GLP-1 RA use before endoscopy does not increase respiratory complications, supporting continued preoperative medication use.

Medical Weight Management Considerations in Plastic Surgery

SUMMARY

Obesity is one of the greatest public health concerns in the United States and has reached an epidemic scope over the past few decades. Plastic surgery in patients with obesity has been linked to higher complication rates both before and after weight loss. This article discusses the evolution and landscape of antiobesity medications as they apply to plastic surgery. Although bariatric surgery has been effective in long-term treatment, new pharmacologic advances in glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, such as semaglutide, have demonstrated promising effectiveness. These medications pose several unique challenges, particularly with regard to perioperative management and risk of weight regain after discontinuation. An understanding of these new pharmacologic agents is crucial for plastic surgeons, who treat patients with obesity.

Pharmacological management of pediatric metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Pediatric obesity, characterized by a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile for age, affects a substantial number of children and adolescents worldwide. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, represents a prominent hepatic manifestation of obesity and metabolic syndrome, emerging as the most prevalent hepatic disorder among pediatric patients and a significant contributor to liver transplantation in adults. The escalating prevalence of pediatric MASLD mirrors the alarming rise in childhood obesity rates over recent decades. While lifestyle modifications focusing on dietary changes and increased physical activity constitute the cornerstone of MASLD management, achieving and maintaining significant weight reduction remains challenging. Moreover, disease progression often persists despite standard-of-care interventions, warranting exploration into alternative therapeutic strategies. Pharmacological interventions, particularly, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), have shown promise in addressing pediatric obesity and its associated comorbidities, including MASLD. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of GLP-1RA in inducing weight loss and improving liver enzyme levels, suggesting a potential role in halting disease progression, and reducing the risk of major adverse liver outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current pharmacotherapy landscape for pediatric MASLD, with a focus on novel agents such as GLP-1RA. Furthermore, the manuscript proposes a practical algorithm to assist in integrating GLP-1RA into the clinical management of pediatric patients with obesity and MASLD. Despite promising results, further research is warranted to elucidate the long-term efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in pediatric populations.

Glucose-Lowering Agents Developed in the Last Two Decades and Their Perioperative Implications

The last two decades have provided far more options f both patients and their physicians in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. While dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been approved for nearly two decades, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are relatively new. Of interest to perioperative physicians, these drugs present specific perioperative concerns, prompting many societies to issue guidelines. Retained gastric contents due to slow gastric emptying is a significant drawback of GLP-1RAs, increasing the risk of aspiration. Recommendations include withholding GLP-1RAs for a predefined period of time, performing gastric ultrasound to evaluate gastric contents, modifying anesthesia management, particularly with regard to the airway, or canceling the scheduled (elective) surgery or procedure. SGLT-2is are known to increase the risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis. The benefits of both GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is extend beyond the treatment of diabetes. As a result, perioperative physicians may encounter their use outside of their traditional indications. SGLT-2is are being used extensively to treat heart failure and obesity, for example. There have been other developments as well. For instance, Imeglimin, a variant of metformin available in Japan and India, Icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin formulation, and IcoSema, a once-weekly combination of Icodec plus semaglutide, are all being explored, although in their early stages or facing approval challenges.

Perioperative Considerations for Patients on GLP1 Agonists

GlP-1 receptor agonists are a class of medications that are becoming increasingly popular. Large trials have shown that their use provides reliable weight loss in obese patients and improved glycemic control in diabetic patients. Its use also has broader implications for overall metabolic health and has been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk populations. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptors cause multiple effects in the body through stimulation of receptors expressed in a broad range of tissues including the pancreas, liver, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, heart, endothelium, muscle, and brain. For the anesthesia professionals the effects of these medications on gastric emptying is important.

Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity

The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes and obesity was followed by data establishing the cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA in select patient populations. In ongoing trials investigators are interrogating the efficacy of these agents for new indications, including metabolic liver disease, peripheral artery disease, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer disease. The success of GLP-1-based medicines has spurred the development of new molecular entities and combinations with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, exemplified by tirzepatide, a GIP-GLP-1 receptor coagonist. Simultaneously, investigational molecules such as maritide block the GIP and activate the GLP-1 receptor, whereas retatrutide and survodutide enable simultaneous activation of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. Here I highlight evidence establishing the efficacy of GLP-1-based medicines, while discussing data that inform safety, focusing on muscle strength, bone density and fractures, exercise capacity, gastrointestinal motility, retained gastric contents and anesthesia, pancreatic and biliary tract disorders, and the risk of cancer. Rapid progress in development of highly efficacious GLP-1 medicines, and anticipated differentiation of newer agents in subsets of metabolic disorders, will provide greater opportunities for use of personalized medicine approaches to improve the health of people living with cardiometabolic disorders.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on gastric mucosal visibility and retained gastric contents during EGD

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used in diabetes and obesity management. Although GLP-1RAs delay gastric emptying, their impact on visibility during EGD remains uncertain.

METHODS

A 1:1 matched case-control study was conducted. Individuals undergoing EGD who were taking GLP-1RAs were matched to nonusers based on demographic characteristics and diabetes status. A validated scale (POLPREP) was used to determine gastric mucosal visibility scores.

RESULTS

A total of 84 pairs (N = 168) were included. GLP-1RA users had significantly lower visibility scores, with a 2.42 times higher likelihood of lower scores compared with nonusers. In addition, GLP-1RA users had a higher incidence of retained gastric contents (13.1% vs 4.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 4.62; P = .025) and aborted procedures due to this issue. No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1RA use at the time of endoscopy exhibited higher odds of lower gastric mucosal visibility scores, retained contents, and aborted procedures. Further research is warranted.

A Scoping Review of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Are They Associated with Increased Gastric Contents, Regurgitation, and Aspiration Events?

Background: The increased popularity and ubiquitous use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for the treatment of diabetes, heart failure, and obesity has led to significant concern for increased risk for perioperative aspiration, given their effects on delayed gastric emptying. This concern is highlighted by many major societies that have published varying guidance on the perioperative management of these medications, given limited data. We conducted a scoping review of the available literature regarding the aspiration risk and aspiration/regurgitant events related to GLP-1 RAs. Methods: A librarian-assisted search was performed using five electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Platform Databases, including Web of Science Core Collection, KCI Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE, and Preprint Citation Index) from inception through March 2024 for articles that reported endoscopic, ultrasound, and nasogastric evaluation for increased residual gastric volume retained food contents, as well as incidences of regurgitation and aspiration events. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. Results: Of the 3712 citations identified, 24 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies included four prospective, six retrospective, five case series, and nine case reports. The GLP-1 RAs reported in the studies included semaglutide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, and exenatide. All studies, except one case report, reported patients with confounding factors for retained gastric contents and aspiration, such as a history of diabetes, cirrhosis, hypothyroidism, psychiatric disorders, gastric reflux, Barrett's esophagus, Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, gastric polyps, prior abdominal surgeries, autoimmune diseases, pain, ASA physical status classification, procedural factors (i.e., thyroid surgery associated with risk for nausea, ketamine associated with nausea and secretions), and/or medications associated with delayed gastric emptying (opioids, anticholinergics, antidepressants, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, DPP-IV inhibitors, and antacids). Of the eight studies (three prospective and five retrospective) that evaluated residual contents in both GLP-1 users and non-users, seven studies (n = 7/8) reported a significant increase in residual gastric contents in GLP-1 users compared to non-users (19-56% vs. 5-20%). In the three retrospective studies that evaluated for aspiration events, there was no significant difference in aspiration events, with one study reporting aspiration rates of 4.8 cases per 10,000 in GLP-1 RA users compared to 4.6 cases per 10,000 in nonusers and the remaining two studies reporting one aspiration event in the GLP-1 RA user group and none in the non-user group. In one study that evaluated for regurgitation or reflux by esophageal manometry and pH, there was no significant difference in reflux episodes but a reduction in gastric acidity in the GLP-1 RA user group compared to the non-user group. Conclusions: There is significant variability in the findings reported in the studies, and most of these studies include confounding factors that may influence the association between GLP-1 RAs and an increased risk of aspiration and related events. While GLP-1 RAs do increase residual gastric contents in line with their mechanism of action, the currently available data do not suggest a significant increase in aspiration and regurgitation events associated with their use and the withholding of GLP-1 RAs to reduce aspiration and regurgitation events, as is currently recommended by many major societal guidelines. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be helpful in further elucidating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative aspiration risk.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of procedure: cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is associated with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of the procedure compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Two deidentified US commercial healthcare databases.

PARTICIPANTS

43 365 adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist or SGLT-2 inhibitor within 30 days before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was pulmonary aspiration on the day of or the day after endoscopy, defined using diagnostic codes. The secondary outcome was discontinuation of endoscopy. Risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated after fine stratification weighting based on propensity score.

RESULTS

After weighting, 24 817 adults used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (mean age 59.9 years; 63.6% female) and 18 537 used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (59.8 years; 63.7% female). Among users of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors, the weighted risk per 1000 people was, respectively, 4.15 and 4.26 for pulmonary aspiration and 9.79 and 4.91 for discontinuation of endoscopy. Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitor use, GLP-1 receptor agonist use was not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration (pooled risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.31), although it was associated with a higher risk for discontinuation of endoscopy (1.99, 1.56 to 2.53).

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparative cohort study, no increased risk of pulmonary aspiration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was observed among adults with type 2 diabetes using GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors within 30 days of the procedure; however, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of endoscopy, possibly owing to a higher risk of retained gastric content. In the absence of evidence from randomized trials, these findings could inform future practice recommendations on the preprocedural protocol for patients requiring endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: mechanisms, management, and future directions

The availability of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) such as liraglutide and semaglutide, and a GLP-1 and glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide coagonist (tirzepatide) represents a paradigm shift in the management of both type 2 diabetes and obesity. There is now considerable attention, including in the public media, on the effect of both long-acting and short-acting GLP-1RAs to delay gastric emptying. Although slowed gastric emptying is integral to reducing post-prandial blood glucose responses in type 2 diabetes, marked slowing of gastric emptying might also increase the propensity for longer intragastric retention of food, with a consequent increased risk of aspiration at the time of surgery or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. This Personal View summarises current knowledge of the effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs on gastrointestinal physiology, particularly gastric emptying, and discusses the implications for the development of sound pre-operative or pre-procedural guidelines. The development of pre-procedural guidelines is currently compromised by the poor evidence base, particularly in relation to the effect of long-acting GLP-1RAs on gastric emptying. We suggest pre-procedural management pathways for individuals on GLP-1RA-based therapy and discuss priorities for future research.

The role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity

INTRODRODUCTION

Obesity and its associated metabolic conditions have become a significant global health problem in recent years, with many people living with obesity fulfilling criteria for pharmacological treatment. The development of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for chronic weight management has triggered new interest in the incretins and other hormones as targets for obesity, and investigations into dual and triple co-agonists.

METHODS

The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the available data on approved and emerging incretin-based agents for the treatment of obesity.

RESULTS

In clinical trials of currently available agents in people with overweight or obesity, weight loss of between 6% and 21% of baseline body weight has been observed, with between 23% and 94% of participants achieving 10% or higher weight loss, depending on the study and the agent used. Favourable outcomes have also been seen with regard to cardiovascular risk and outcomes, diabetes prevention, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis and prevention of weight regain after metabolic surgery. Limitations associated with these agents include high costs, the potential for weight regain once treatment is stopped, the potential loss of lean body mass and gastrointestinal adverse events; potential issues with respect to gallbladder and biliary diseases require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Many dual and triple co-agonists are still in development, and more data are needed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these emerging therapies versus the established incretin-based therapies; however, data are promising, and further results are eagerly awaited.

Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: An Updated Review

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become one of the most popular medications for patients with diabetes and obesity. Due to their effects on gut motility via central or parasympathetic pathways, there have been concerns about an increased incidence of retained gastric contents and risk of aspiration in the perioperative period. Hence, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) recommends holding GLP-1 RAs on the procedure day or a week before the elective procedure based on the respective daily or weekly formulations, regardless of the dose, indication (obesity or diabetes), or procedure type. On the contrary, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) advises an individualized approach, stating that more data are needed to decide if and when the GLP-1 RAs should be held prior to elective endoscopy. Several retrospective and prospective studies, along with meta-analyses, have been published since then evaluating the role of GLP-1 RAs in patients scheduled for endoscopic procedures. In this review, we discuss the current clinical guidelines and available studies regarding the effect of GLP-1 RAs on GI endoscopies.

Real-World Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Endoscopic Patient Outcomes in an Ambulatory Setting: A Retrospective Study at a Large Tertiary Center

Background: Glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with delayed gastric emptying and may increase the risk of aspiration due to retained gastric contents. There are no guidelines on peri-endoscopic use of GLP-1 RAs, and real-world outcomes in an ambulatory setting remain unknown. This study reports real-world data from an ambulatory center associated with a large tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a hospital-based outpatient center from January to June 2023. Exclusions included non-elective procedures, current opioid use, altered foregut anatomy, and known gastroparesis. All patients were on GLP-1 RAs before endoscopy and followed standard fasting protocols. Adverse event rates were recorded, and patients were divided into cohorts based on GLP-1 RA use. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified risk factors for food retention and complications. Results: A total of 1438 patients underwent elective EGD during the study period. Among the 1046 patients included, 73 (7%) were on GLP-1 RAs. The procedure was aborted in four patients (0.4%) due to gastric food retention, with two (50%) on GLP-1 RAs. Independent risk factors for food retention included GLP-1 RA use (OR: 9.19; 95% CI: 2.73-30.8; p = 0.0003) and diabetes (OR 5.6; 95% CI: 1.72-18.2; p = 0.004). Tirzepatide showed the strongest association (p = 0.0056). Factors that did not impact food retention included A1c, BMI, and gender. Protective factors were age (OR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.02) and same-day colonoscopy (OR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.58; p = 0.003). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use in diabetics increases the risk of retained gastric contents during elective EGD, particularly with tirzepatide, without increasing aspiration risk. Patients undergoing simultaneous colonoscopy had a lower risk of retained gastric contents. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of GLP-1 RAs on gastric food retention and procedural risk.

Comparison of societal guidance on perioperative management of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: implications for clinical practice and future investigations

PURPOSE

The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) by patients undergoing surgery and procedures requiring anesthesia has become a topic of significant concern for perioperative providers because of the potential increased risk of aspiration resulting from the medication's effect of delaying gastric emptying. There is currently a lack of high-quality data regarding the safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients undergoing surgery, which has led to variations in practice.

SOURCE

We performed an internet search of society-endorsed statements and guidelines related to perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs, focusing on the top 20 countries with the largest anesthesiology societies determined by membership data from the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists. We excluded articles and websites that were not in English.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Our search revealed endorsed statements from fourteen major anesthesiology, endocrinology, and gastroenterology societies. There was considerable variation between societies in the recommendations and guidance for withholding these medications before surgery, the duration of withholding, assessment of the need for avoiding deep sedation or general anesthesia, use of rapid sequence intubation, need for prolonged fasting periods and clear fluid before a nil per os period, recognition of signs and symptoms for aspiration risk, the management of glucose in the perioperative period, and the use of point-of-care ultrasound for risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

Society-endorsed statements and guidelines provide varying recommendations on the perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs. The insights gained from this comparative analysis may help guide clinical practice, develop institutional practice guidelines, and direct future research efforts.