1
|
van Keulen KE, Papanikolaou IS, Mak TWC, Apostolopoulos P, Neumann H, Delconte G, Furnari M, Peters Y, Lau JYW, Polymeros D, Schrauwen RWN, Cavalcoli F, Koukoulioti E, Triantafyllou K, Anderson JC, Pohl H, Rex DK, Siersema PD. Comparison of adenoma miss rate and adenoma detection rate between conventional colonoscopy and colonoscopy with second-generation distal attachment cuff: a multicenter, randomized, back-to-back trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:798-808.e3. [PMID: 37993062 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endocuff Vision (Olympus Europe, Hamburg, Germany) has been designed to enhance mucosal visualization, thereby improving detection of (pre-)malignant colorectal lesions. This multicenter, international, back-to-back, randomized colonoscopy trial compared the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenoma miss rate (AMR) between Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy (EVC) and conventional colonoscopy (CC). METHODS Patients aged 40 to 75 years referred for non-immunochemical fecal occult blood test-based screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy were included at 10 hospitals and randomized into 4 groups: group 1, 2 × CC; group 2, CC followed by EVC; group 3, EVC followed by CC; and group 4, 2 × EVC. Primary outcomes included ADR and AMR. RESULTS A total of 717 patients were randomized, of whom 661 patients (92.2%) had 1 and 646 (90.1%) patients had 2 completed back-to-back colonoscopies. EVC did not significantly improve ADR compared to CC (41.1%; [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.1-46.3] vs 35.5% [95% CI, 30.7-40.6], respectively; P = .125), but EVC did reduce AMR by 11.7% (29.6% [95% CI, 23.6-36.5] vs 17.9% [95% CI, 12.5-23.5], respectively; P = .049). AMR of 2 × CC compared to 2 × EVC was also not significantly different (25.9% [95% CI, 19.3-33.9] vs 18.8% [95% CI, 13.9-24.8], respectively; P = .172). Only 3.7% of the polyps missed during the first procedures had advanced pathologic features. Factors affecting risk of missing adenomas were age (P = .002), Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (P = .008), and region where colonoscopy was performed (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our trial shows that EVC reduces the risk of missing adenomas but does not lead to a significantly improved ADR. Remarkably, 25% of adenomas are still missed during conventional colonoscopies, which is not different from miss rates reported 25 years ago; reassuringly, advanced features were only found in 3.7% of these missed lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03418948.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E van Keulen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Tony W C Mak
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hongkong, Hongkong, China
| | | | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gabriele Delconte
- Department of Diagnostic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Yonne Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - James Y W Lau
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hongkong, Hongkong, China
| | - Dimitrios Polymeros
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ruud W N Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Federica Cavalcoli
- Department of Diagnostic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Eleni Koukoulioti
- Department of Gastroenterology, 417 Army Veterans Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libânio D, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellisé M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albéniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38670139 DOI: 10.1055/a-2304-3219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19 mm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥ 20 mm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelical Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mauro Risio
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Endoscopy Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital / IISLaFe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leon M G Moons
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Probst
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Halim Awadie
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Hepatogastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Recherches Biochirurgicales, APHP-Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hugo U Koecklin
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN); Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodastrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jirapinyo P, Hadefi A, Thompson CC, Patai ÁV, Pannala R, Goelder SK, Kushnir V, Barthet M, Apovian CM, Boskoski I, Chapman CG, Davidson P, Donatelli G, Kumbhari V, Hayee B, Esker J, Hucl T, Pryor AD, Maselli R, Schulman AR, Pattou F, Zelber-Sagi S, Bain PA, Durieux V, Triantafyllou K, Thosani N, Huberty V, Sullivan S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38641332 DOI: 10.1055/a-2292-2494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alia Hadefi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christopher C Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Árpád V Patai
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Stefan K Goelder
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Department of Medicine-Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille, France
| | - Caroline M Apovian
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, and Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher G Chapman
- Center for Interventional and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - Paul Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gianfranco Donatelli
- Unité d'Endoscopie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Paris, France and Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Bu Hayee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Janelle Esker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Queens, New York, USA
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Francois Pattou
- Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Inserm, Institut Pasteur Lille, Lille, France
| | - Shira Zelber-Sagi
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel and Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Valérie Durieux
- Bibliothèque des Sciences de la Santé, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vincent Huberty
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shelby Sullivan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jirapinyo P, Hadefi A, Thompson CC, Patai ÁV, Pannala R, Goelder SK, Kushnir V, Barthet M, Apovian CM, Boskoski I, Chapman CG, Davidson P, Donatelli G, Kumbhari V, Hayee B, Esker J, Hucl T, Pryor AD, Maselli R, Schulman AR, Pattou F, Zelber-Sagi S, Bain PA, Durieux V, Triantafyllou K, Thosani N, Huberty V, Sullivan S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on primary endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies for adults with obesity. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(23)03148-6. [PMID: 38639680 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Alia Hadefi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christopher C Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Árpád V Patai
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Stefan K Goelder
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Department of Medicine-Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille, France
| | - Caroline M Apovian
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, and Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher G Chapman
- Center for Interventional and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - Paul Davidson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gianfranco Donatelli
- Unité d'Endoscopie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Paris, France and Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Bu Hayee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Janelle Esker
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Queens, New York, USA
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Francois Pattou
- Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Inserm, Institut Pasteur Lille, Lille, France
| | - Shira Zelber-Sagi
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel and Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Valérie Durieux
- Bibliothèque des Sciences de la Santé, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vincent Huberty
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shelby Sullivan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Manti M, Shah J, Papaefthymiou A, Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Tziatzios G, Papadopoulos V, Paraskeva K, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Archibugi L, Vanella G, Hollenbach M, Gkolfakis P. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Biliary Stones: An Evergreen Issue. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60:340. [PMID: 38399627 PMCID: PMC10890215 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Choledocholithiasis is one of the most common indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in daily practice. Although the majority of stones are small and can be easily removed in a single endoscopy session, approximately 10-15% of patients have complex biliary stones, requiring additional procedures for an optimum clinical outcome. A plethora of endoscopic methods is available for the removal of difficult biliary stones, including papillary large balloon dilation, mechanical lithotripsy, and electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy. In-depth knowledge of these techniques and the emerging literature on them is required to yield the most optimal therapeutic effects. This narrative review aims to describe the definition of difficult bile duct stones based on certain characteristics and streamline their endoscopic retrieval using various modalities to achieve higher clearance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalini Manti
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India;
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Endoscopy Unit, Cleveland Clinic London, London SW1X 7HY, UK;
- Department of Gastroenterology, General University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 00161 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA;
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Vasilios Papadopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, General University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Konstantina Paraskeva
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine—Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.S.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine—Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.S.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Brussels (HUB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (G.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (G.V.)
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Medical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Brussels (HUB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Toumpourleka M, Siokas V, Papadopoulos C, Mitselou A, Kovatsi L, Sidiropoulou MS, Triantafyllou K, Vassilikos V. Fatal Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture Complicating Acute Myopericarditis. JACC Case Rep 2024; 29:102178. [PMID: 38361552 PMCID: PMC10865129 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.102178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
This is a case of a 59-year-old man presenting with myopericarditis. Over a 2-week period, he developed progressive symptoms and worsening pericardial effusion, leading to cardiac tamponade. Pericardiocentesis revealed hemopericardium, and multidetector computed tomography angiography showed left ventricular free wall rupture. The patient collapsed abruptly, and autopsy confirmed the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Toumpourleka
- Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vasileios Siokas
- Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Antigony Mitselou
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Leda Kovatsi
- Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria S. Sidiropoulou
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Department of Radiology, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Vassilios Vassilikos
- Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Antonelli G, Voiosu AM, Pawlak KM, Gonçalves TC, Le N, Bronswijk M, Hollenbach M, Elshaarawy O, Beilenhoff U, Mascagni P, Voiosu T, Pellisé M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Messmann H, Gralnek IM. Training in basic gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2024; 56:131-150. [PMID: 38040025 DOI: 10.1055/a-2205-2613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
This ESGE Position Statement provides structured and evidence-based guidance on the essential requirements and processes involved in training in basic gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. The document outlines definitions; competencies required, and means to their assessment and maintenance; the structure and requirements of training programs; patient safety and medicolegal issues. 1: ESGE and ESGENA define basic endoscopic procedures as those procedures that are commonly indicated, generally accessible, and expected to be mastered (technically and cognitively) by the end of any core training program in gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2: ESGE and ESGENA consider the following as basic endoscopic procedures: diagnostic upper and lower GI endoscopy, as well as a limited range of interventions such as: tissue acquisition via cold biopsy forceps, polypectomy for lesions ≤ 10 mm, hemostasis techniques, enteral feeding tube placement, foreign body retrieval, dilation of simple esophageal strictures, and India ink tattooing of lesion location. 3: ESGE and ESGENA recommend that training in GI endoscopy should be subject to stringent formal requirements that ensure all ESGE key performance indicators (KPIs) are met. 4: Training in basic endoscopic procedures is a complex process and includes the development and acquisition of cognitive, technical/motor, and integrative skills. Therefore, ESGE and ESGENA recommend the use of validated tools to track the development of skills and assess competence. 5: ESGE and ESGENA recommend incorporating a multimodal approach to evaluating competence in basic GI endoscopic procedures, including procedural thresholds and the measurement and documentation of established ESGE KPIs. 7: ESGE and ESGENA recommend the continuous monitoring of ESGE KPIs during GI endoscopy training to ensure the trainee's maintenance of competence. 9: ESGE and ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy training units fulfil the ESGE KPIs for endoscopy units and, furthermore, be capable of providing the dedicated personnel, infrastructure, and sufficient case volume required for successful training within a structured training program. 10: ESGE and ESGENA recommend that trainers in basic GI endoscopic procedures should be endoscopists with formal educational training in the teaching of endoscopy, which allows them to successfully and safely teach trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Antonelli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Katarzyna M Pawlak
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin, Poland
- The Center for Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Nha Le
- Gastroenterology Division, Internal Medicine and Hematology Department, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Omar Elshaarawy
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | | | - Pietro Mascagni
- IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hassan C, Triantafyllou K. ESGE and its publications. Endoscopy 2024; 56:151-153. [PMID: 38290501 DOI: 10.1055/a-2199-7741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ouazana S, Baltes P, Toth E, Lüttge H, Nemeth A, Beaumont H, González-Suárez B, Lee PS, Carretero C, Yehuda RM, Elli L, Spada C, Bruno M, Mussetto A, Valdivia PC, Becq A, Corbett G, Martin A, Robertson A, Benamouzig R, Despott E, Riccioni ME, Sidhu R, Calavas L, Ellul P, Finta A, Triantafyllou K, Rondonotti E, Kirchgesner J, Elosua A, McNamara D, Dray X. Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Placement of Capsule Endoscopy to Investigate the Small Bowel: a Multicentric European Retrospective Series of 630 Procedures in Adult Patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00047-6. [PMID: 38272273 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) is a first line procedure for exploring the SB. Endoscopic GastroIntestinal PlacemenT (EGIPT) of SB CE is sometimes necessary. While the experience of EGIPT is large in pediatric populations, we aimed to describe the safety, efficacy and outcomes of EGIPT of SB CE in adult patients. METHODS The international CApsule endoscopy REsearch (iCARE) group set up a retrospective multicenter study. Patients over 18 year-old who underwent EGIPT of SB CE before May 2022 were included. Data were collected from medical records and capsule recordings. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of the EGIPT procedures. RESULTS 630 patients were included (mean age 62.5 years old, 55.9% female) from 39,565 patients (1.6%) issued from 29 centers. EGIPT technical success was achieved in 610 procedures (96.8%). Anesthesia (moderate/deep sedation or general anesthesia) and centers with intermediate or high procedure loads were independent factors of technical success. Severe adverse events occurred in three (0.5%) patients. When technically successful, EGIPT was associated with a high SB CE completion rate (84.4%) and with a substantial diagnostic yield (61.1%). Completion rate was significantly higher when the capsule was delivered in the SB compared to when delivered in the stomach. CONCLUSION EGIPT of SB CE is highly feasible, safe and comes with high completion rate and diagnostic yield. When indicated, it should rather be performed under anesthesia and the capsule should be delivered in the duodenum rather than in the stomach, for better SB examination outcomes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fostier R, Tziatzios G, Facciorusso A, Papaefthymiou A, Arvanitakis M, Triantafyllou K, Gkolfakis P. Models and scores to predict adequacy of bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 67:101859. [PMID: 38103925 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Adequate bowel preparation is of paramount importance for the effectiveness of preventive colonoscopy as it allows visualization of the mucosal surface and adenomas detection, the pre-malignant lesions leading to colon cancer. Still, a considerable portion of patients fail to achieve adequate bowel cleansing, with predictors of inadequate bowel preparation being at the focal point of several studies, so far. Incorporation of these factors within predictive models has been implemented in an effort to promptly identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation and thus, timely adopt practices that have the potential to improve bowel cleansing. Ultimately, this could lead to improved procedural outcomes not only in terms of neoplastic detection rate but also interval repeat procedures, expenses, patient convenience and adverse events risk. Aim of this manuscript is to present an up to date overview of all predictive scores/models addressing bowel cleansing adequacy in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romane Fostier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", Athens, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee PJ, Culp S, Kamal A, Paragomi P, Pothoulakis I, Talukdar R, Kochhar R, Goenka MK, Gulla A, Gonzales J, Stevens T, Barbu S, Nawaz H, Gutierrez S, Zarnescu N, Capurso G, Easler J, Triantafyllou K, Ocampo C, de-Madaria E, Wu B, Hart PA, Akshintala VS, Singh VK, Bischof J, Buxbaum J, Pelaez M, Papachristou GI. Lactated Ringers Use in the First 24 Hours of Hospitalization Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in 999 Patients With Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:2258-2266. [PMID: 37428139 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent pilot trials in acute pancreatitis (AP) found that lactated ringers (LR) usage may result in decreased risk of moderately severe/severe AP compared with normal saline, but their small sample sizes limit statistical power. We investigated whether LR usage is associated with improved outcomes in AP in an international multicenter prospective study. METHODS Patients directly admitted with the diagnosis of AP were prospectively enrolled at 22 international sites between 2015 and 2018. Demographics, fluid administration, and AP severity data were collected in a standardized prospective manner to examine the association between LR and AP severity outcomes. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the direction and magnitude of the relationship between the type of fluid administered during the first 24 hours and the development of moderately severe/severe AP. RESULTS Data from 999 patients were analyzed (mean age 51 years, female 52%, moderately severe/severe AP 24%). Usage of LR during the first 24 hours was associated with reduced odds of moderately severe/severe AP (adjusted odds ratio 0.52; P = 0.014) compared with normal saline after adjusting for region of enrollment, etiology, body mass index, and fluid volume and accounting for the variation across centers. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses eliminating the effects of admission organ failure, etiology, and excessive total fluid volume. DISCUSSION LR administration in the first 24 hours of hospitalization was associated with improved AP severity. A large-scale randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Stacey Culp
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ayesha Kamal
- Division of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pedram Paragomi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
| | | | - Aiste Gulla
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jose Gonzales
- Universidad Autónoma de Nueva León, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Tyler Stevens
- Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sorin Barbu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu," Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Haq Nawaz
- Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine, USA
| | - Silvia Gutierrez
- Hospital Nacional "Profesor Alejandro Posadas", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Gabriele Capurso
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeff Easler
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Carlos Ocampo
- Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Enrique de-Madaria
- Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL-Fundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain
| | - Bechien Wu
- Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Phil A Hart
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Venkata S Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jason Bischof
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James Buxbaum
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mario Pelaez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán-Universidad Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Georgios I Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, di Pietro M, Pech O, Spaander MCW, Baldaque-Silva F, Barret M, Coron E, Fernández-Esparrach G, Fitzgerald RC, Jansen M, Jovani M, Marques-de-Sa I, Rattan A, Tan WK, Verheij EPD, Zellenrath PA, Triantafyllou K, Pouw RE. Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1124-1146. [PMID: 37813356 DOI: 10.1055/a-2176-2440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
MR1 : ESGE recommends the following standards for Barrett esophagus (BE) surveillance:- a minimum of 1-minute inspection time per cm of BE length during a surveillance endoscopy- photodocumentation of landmarks, the BE segment including one picture per cm of BE length, and the esophagogastric junction in retroflexed position, and any visible lesions- use of the Prague and (for visible lesions) Paris classification- collection of biopsies from all visible abnormalities (if present), followed by random four-quadrant biopsies for every 2-cm BE length.Strong recommendation, weak quality of evidence. MR2: ESGE suggests varying surveillance intervals for different BE lengths. For BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 1 cm and < 3 cm, BE surveillance should be repeated every 5 years. For BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 3 cm and < 10 cm, the interval for endoscopic surveillance should be 3 years. Patients with BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 10 cm should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance endoscopies. For patients with an irregular Z-line/columnar-lined esophagus of < 1 cm, no routine biopsies or endoscopic surveillance are advised.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR3: ESGE suggests that, if a patient has reached 75 years of age at the time of the last surveillance endoscopy and/or the patient's life expectancy is less than 5 years, the discontinuation of further surveillance endoscopies can be considered. Weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends offering endoscopic eradication therapy using ablation to patients with BE and low grade dysplasia (LGD) on at least two separate endoscopies, both confirmed by a second experienced pathologist.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends endoscopic ablation treatment for BE with confirmed high grade dysplasia (HGD) without visible lesions, to prevent progression to invasive cancer.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends offering complete eradication of all remaining Barrett epithelium by ablation after endoscopic resection of visible abnormalities containing any degree of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection as curative treatment for T1a Barrett's cancer with well/moderate differentiation and no signs of lymphovascular invasion.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR8: ESGE suggests that low risk submucosal (T1b) EAC (i. e. submucosal invasion depth ≤ 500 µm AND no [lympho]vascular invasion AND no poor tumor differentiation) can be treated by endoscopic resection, provided that adequate follow-up with gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and computed tomography (CT)/positrion emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed in expert centers.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR9: ESGE suggests that submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma with deep submucosal invasion (tumor invasion > 500 µm into the submucosa), and/or (lympho)vascular invasion, and/or a poor tumor differentiation should be considered high risk. Complete staging and consideration of additional treatments (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and/or surgery) or strict endoscopic follow-up should be undertaken on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR10 A: ESGE recommends that the first endoscopic follow-up after successful endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) of BE is performed in an expert center.Strong recommendation, very low quality of evidence. B: ESGE recommends careful inspection of the neo-squamocolumnar junction and neo-squamous epithelium with high definition white-light endoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy during post-EET surveillance, to detect recurrent dysplasia.Strong recommendation, very low level of evidence. C: ESGE recommends against routine four-quadrant biopsies of neo-squamous epithelium after successful EET of BE.Strong recommendation, low level of evidence. D: ESGE suggests, after successful EET, obtaining four-quadrant random biopsies just distal to a normal-appearing neo-squamocolumnar junction to detect dysplasia in the absence of visible lesions.Weak recommendation, low level of evidence. E: ESGE recommends targeted biopsies are obtained where there is a suspicion of recurrent BE in the tubular esophagus, or where there are visible lesions suspicious for dysplasia.Strong recommendation, very low level of evidence. MR11: After successful EET, ESGE recommends the following surveillance intervals:- For patients with a baseline diagnosis of HGD or EAC:at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 years after last treatment, after which surveillance may be stopped.- For patients with a baseline diagnosis of LGD:at 1, 3, and 5 years after last treatment, after which surveillance may be stopped.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto Portugal
| | - Massimiliano di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, St. John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Advanced Endoscopy Center Carlos Moreira da Silva, Department of Gastroenterology, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos, Portugal
- Division of Medicine, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD, Centre hospitalier universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, Nantes, France
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biomedical Research Network on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rebecca C Fitzgerald
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marnix Jansen
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Manol Jovani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Maimonides Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ines Marques-de-Sa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto Portugal
| | - Arti Rattan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Keith Tan
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eva P D Verheij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A Zellenrath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liontou C, Kalogera V, Oikonomou D, Stalikas D, Pappas L, Triantafyllou K. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 39:2567-2574. [PMID: 37882959 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-02967-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a new angiography-based coronary physiology tool aimed to evaluate functional relevance of intermediate coronary lesions. Aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of QFR in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in comparison to currently used non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). In this prospective, single-centre study, coronary physiology of intermediate coronary stenoses of non-culprit vessels in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS was evaluated using NHPRs (iFR, DFR or RFR). Subsequently, QFR was computed offline by a QFR analyst blinded to the NHPR results. Diagnostic performance of QFR was assessed in comparison to NHPRs as reference standard. A total of 60 vessels with intermediate coronary stenoses was investigated. The NHPRs were used as follows: RFR 38%, DFR 47% and iFR 15% of the cases. The NHPR result was positive, showing significant lesion, in 19 cases. A significant correlation was found between NHPR and QFR (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Classification agreement of the two methods (95%) and diagnostic performance of QFR in comparison to NHPR (AUC: 0.962 [0.914-1.00]) were both high. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of QFR in comparison to NHPR were 84.2%, 100%, 100% and 93.2% respectively. QFR has high diagnostic performance in detecting functionally significant lesions of non-culprit arteries in patients with NSTE-ACS and multivessel disease. Due to its high negative predictive value, it can be used to safely avoid unnecessary invasive physiological assessment of these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Liontou
- 1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece.
| | - Vasiliki Kalogera
- 1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Oikonomou
- 1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Stalikas
- 1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Loukas Pappas
- 1st Cardiology Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou Str. 45-47, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kapelios CJ, Antonopoulos A, Bakogiannis C, Kachrimanidis I, Mantzouranis E, Papakonstantinou P, Spartalis M, Triantafyllou K, Tzanis G, Velegraki E, Loizos S. Current landscape in cardiology training, unmet needs, and attitudes on career development among cardiology trainees and young cardiologists in Greece: an HCS Young Cardiologists WG survey. Hellenic J Cardiol 2023:S1109-9666(23)00225-7. [PMID: 37992894 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J Kapelios
- Heart Failure and Transplantation Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.
| | - Alexios Antonopoulos
- 1(st) Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Constantinos Bakogiannis
- Third Cardiology Department, School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kachrimanidis
- 1(st) Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Mantzouranis
- 1(st) Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Michael Spartalis
- 3(rd) Department of Cardiology, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Third Cardiology Department, School of Medicine, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Giorgos Tzanis
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Metropolitan General, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Savvas Loizos
- 6(th) Cardiology Department, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Triantafyllou K, Fragakis N, Gatzoulis KA, Antoniadis A, Giannopoulos G, Arsenos P, Tsiachris D, Antoniou C, Trachanas K, Tsimos K, Vassilikos V. Risk assessment of post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction using 45-min short resting Holter electrocardiographic recordings. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2023; 28:e13087. [PMID: 37700553 PMCID: PMC10646375 DOI: 10.1111/anec.13087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients remains a challenging task. Several electrocardiographic noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) have been associated with adverse outcomes and were used to refine risk assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of NIRFs extracted from 45-min short resting Holter ECG recordings (SHR), in predicting ventricular tachycardia inducibility with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in post-MI patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS We studied 99 post-MI ischemia-free patients (mean age: 60.5 ± 9.5 years, 86.9% men) with LVEF ≥40%, at least 40 days after revascularization. All the patients underwent PVS and a high-resolution SHR. The following parameters were evaluated: mean heart rate, ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular complexes, couplets, tachycardias), QTc duration, heart rate variability (HRV), deceleration capacity, heart rate turbulence, late potentials, and T-wave alternans. RESULTS PVS was positive in 24 patients (24.2%). HRV, assessed by the standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN), was significantly decreased in the positive PVS group (42 ms vs. 51 ms, p = .039). SDNN values <50 ms were also associated with PVS inducibility (OR 3.081, p = .032 in univariate analysis, and 4.588, p = .013 in multivariate analysis). No significant differences were identified for the other NIRFs. The presence of diabetes, history of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and LVEF <50% were also important predictors of positive PVS. CONCLUSIONS HRV assessed from SHR, combined with other noninvasive clinical and echocardiographic variables (diabetes, STEMI history, LVEF), can provide an initial, practical, and rapid screening tool for arrhythmic risk assessment in post-MI patients with preserved LVEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration HospitalAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration HospitalAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| | - Konstantinos A. Gatzoulis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General HospitalNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of MedicineAthensGreece
| | - Antonios Antoniadis
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration HospitalAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| | - Georgios Giannopoulos
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration HospitalAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| | - Petros Arsenos
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General HospitalNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of MedicineAthensGreece
| | - Dimitrios Tsiachris
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General HospitalNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of MedicineAthensGreece
| | - Christos‐Konstantinos Antoniou
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General HospitalNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of MedicineAthensGreece
| | | | - Konstantinos Tsimos
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece
| | - Vassilios Vassilikos
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration HospitalAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Everett SM, Triantafyllou K, Hassan C, Mergener K, Tham TC, Almeida N, Antonelli G, Axon A, Bisschops R, Bretthauer M, Costil V, Foroutan F, Gauci J, Hritz I, Messmann H, Pellisé M, Roelandt P, Seicean A, Tziatzios G, Voiosu A, Gralnek IM. Informed consent for endoscopic procedures: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023; 55:952-966. [PMID: 37557899 DOI: 10.1055/a-2133-3365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
All endoscopic procedures are invasive and carry risk. Accordingly, all endoscopists should involve the patient in the decision-making process about the most appropriate endoscopic procedure for that individual, in keeping with a patient's right to self-determination and autonomy. Recognition of this has led to detailed guidelines on informed consent for endoscopy in some countries, but in many no such guidance exists; this may lead to variations in care and exposure to risk of litigation. In this document, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) sets out a series of statements that cover best practice in informed consent for endoscopy. These statements should be seen as a minimum standard of practice, but practitioners must be aware of and adhere to the law in their own country. 1: Patients should give informed consent for all gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures for which they have capacity to do so. 2: The healthcare professional seeking consent for an endoscopic procedure should ensure that the patient has the capacity to consent to that procedure. 3: For patients who lack capacity, healthcare personnel should at all times try to engage with people close to the patient, such as family, friends, or caregivers, to achieve consensus on the appropriateness of performing the procedure. 4: Where a patient lacks capacity to provide informed consent, the best interest decision should be clearly documented in the medical record. This should include information about the capacity assessment, reason(s) that the decision cannot be delayed for capacity recovery (or if recovery is not expected), who has been consulted, and where relevant the form of authority for the decision. 5: There should be a systematic and transparent disclosure of the expected benefits and harms that may reasonably affect patient choice on whether or not to undergo any diagnostic or interventional endoscopic procedure. Information about possible alternatives, as well as the consequences of doing nothing, should also be provided when relevant. 6: The information provided on the benefit and harms of an endoscopic procedure should be adapted to the procedure and patient-specific risk factors, and the preferences of the patient should be central to the consent process. 7: The consent discussion should be undertaken by an individual who is familiar with the procedure and its risks, and is able to discuss these in the context of the individual patient. 8: Patients should confirm consent to an endoscopic procedure in a private, unrushed, and non-coercive environment. 9: If a patient requests that an endoscopic procedure be discontinued, the procedure should be paused and the patient's capacity for decision making assessed. If a competent patient continues to object to the procedure, or if a conclusive determination of capacity is not feasible, the examination should be terminated as soon as it is safe to do so. 10: Informed consent should be sufficiently detailed to cover all findings that can be reasonably anticipated during an endoscopic examination. The scope of this consent should not be expanded, nor a patient's implicit consent for additional interventions assumed, unless failure to proceed with such interventions would result in immediate and predictable harm to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Everett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Nuno Almeida
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Farid Foroutan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation
| | - James Gauci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pinderfields Hospital, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK
| | - Istvan Hritz
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Center for Therapeutic Endoscopy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philip Roelandt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrada Seicean
- Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu" Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andrei Voiosu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital and Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nikolaki MD, Kasti AN, Katsas K, Petsis K, Lambrinou S, Patsalidou V, Stamatopoulou S, Karlatira K, Kapolos J, Papadimitriou K, Triantafyllou K. The Low-FODMAP Diet, IBS, and BCFAs: Exploring the Positive, Negative, and Less Desirable Aspects-A Literature Review. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2387. [PMID: 37894045 PMCID: PMC10609264 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The literature about the association of branched short-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is limited. BCFAs, the bacterial products of the catabolism of branched-chain amino acids, are proposed as markers for colonic protein fermentation. IBS is a gastrointestinal disorder characterized by low-grade inflammation and intestinal dysbiosis. The low-FODMAP diet (LFD) has increasingly been applied as first-line therapy for managing IBS symptoms, although it decreases the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), well known for their anti-inflammatory action. In parallel, high protein consumption increases BCFAs. Protein fermentation alters the colonic microbiome through nitrogenous metabolites production, known for their detrimental effects on the intestinal barrier promoting inflammation. Purpose: This review aims to explore the role of BCFAs on gut inflammation in patients with IBS and the impact of LFD in BCFAs production. Methods: A literature search was carried out using a combination of terms in scientific databases. Results: The included studies have contradictory findings about how BCFAs affect the intestinal health of IBS patients. Conclusions: Although evidence suggests that BCFAs may play a protective role in gut inflammation, other metabolites of protein fermentation are associated with gut inflammation. Further research is needed in order to clarify how diet protein composition and, consequently, the BCFAs are implicated in IBS pathogenesis or in symptoms management with LFD+.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroulla D. Nikolaki
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 72300 Crete, Greece
| | - Arezina N. Kasti
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Konstantinos Katsas
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
- Institute of Preventive Medicine Environmental and Occupational Health Prolepsis, 15125 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Petsis
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Sophia Lambrinou
- Department of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics, General Hospital of Karpathos “Aghios Ioannis o Karpathios”, 85700 Karpathos, Greece;
| | - Vasiliki Patsalidou
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Sophia Stamatopoulou
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Katerina Karlatira
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (M.D.N.); (A.N.K.); (K.K.); (K.P.); (V.P.); (S.S.); (K.K.)
| | - John Kapolos
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece;
| | - Konstantinos Papadimitriou
- Laboratory of Food Quality Control and Hygiene, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece;
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Propaedeutic Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ATTIKON University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Manti M, Tziatzios G, Facciorusso A, Papaefthymiou A, Ramai D, Papanikolaou I, Hassan C, Triantafyllou K, Paraskeva K, Gkolfakis P. Effect of add-on devices with projections on screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:533-540. [PMID: 37664236 PMCID: PMC10433254 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Add-on devices with projections, e.g., Endocuff, Endocuff Vision, EndoRings, and Wingcap, placed on the distal tip of the colonoscope promise to improve the detection of precancerous lesions. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of these devices exclusively among individuals undergoing colonoscopy for screening purpose. Methods A computerized literature search was performed across MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials that compared standard colonoscopy (SC) to procedures using add-on devices. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), while secondary outcomes included polyp detection rate (PDR), advanced ADR (AADR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR). The effect size on study outcomes was calculated using a random-effects model and presented as the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Seven studies enrolling a total of 5785 patients were included. The use of add-on-devices with projections was associated with a higher ADR compared to SC: 45.9% vs. 41.1%; RR 1.18, 95%CI 1.02-1.37; P=0.03; I2=79%. Although PDR was higher in screening colonoscopies assisted by add-on devices as compared to SC, the difference failed to reach significance: 55.1% vs. 50.8%; RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.96-1.26; P=0.17; I2=75%. No difference was found between procedures assisted by add-on devices with projections and SC colonoscopies in terms of AADR (18.5% vs. 17.6%; RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.79-1.27; P=0.98; I2=56%) or SSLDR (6.8% vs. 5.8%; RR 1.17, 95%CI 0.95-1.44; P=0.15; I2=0%). Conclusion Colonoscopy assisted by add-on devices with projections achieves a better ADR compared to SC among individuals undergoing screening for bowel cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalini Manti
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece (Magdalini Manti, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva, Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece (Magdalini Manti, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva, Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreatobiliary Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (Apostolis Papaefthymiou)
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, USA (Daryl Ramai)
| | - Ioannis Papanikolaou
- Gastroenterology Department, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece (Ioannis Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Gastroenterology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy (Cesare Hassan)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Gastroenterology Department, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece (Ioannis Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Konstantina Paraskeva
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece (Magdalini Manti, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva, Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece (Magdalini Manti, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantina Paraskeva, Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Mori Y, Foroutan F, Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Triantafyllou K, Antonelli G, Khalaf K, Rizkala T, Vandvik PO, Fugazza A, Rondonotti E, Glissen-Brown JR, Kamba S, Maida M, Correale L, Bhandari P, Jover R, Sharma P, Rex DK, Repici A. Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia During Colonoscopy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1209-1220. [PMID: 37639719 DOI: 10.7326/m22-3678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection (CADe) of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy may increase adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and reduce adenoma miss rates, but it may increase overdiagnosis and overtreatment of nonneoplastic polyps. PURPOSE To quantify the benefits and harms of CADe in randomized trials. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. (PROSPERO: CRD42022293181). DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases through February 2023. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials comparing CADe-assisted with standard colonoscopy for polyp and cancer detection. DATA EXTRACTION Adenoma detection rate (proportion of patients with ≥1 adenoma), number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma (≥10 mm with high-grade dysplasia and villous histology), number of serrated lesions per colonoscopy, and adenoma miss rate were extracted as benefit outcomes. Number of polypectomies for nonneoplastic lesions and withdrawal time were extracted as harm outcomes. For each outcome, studies were pooled using a random-effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. DATA SYNTHESIS Twenty-one randomized trials on 18 232 patients were included. The ADR was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (44.0% vs. 35.9%; relative risk, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.33]; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to a 55% (risk ratio, 0.45 [CI, 0.35 to 0.58]) relative reduction in miss rate (moderate-certainty evidence). More nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.52 vs. 0.34 per colonoscopy; mean difference [MD], 0.18 polypectomy [CI, 0.11 to 0.26 polypectomy]; low-certainty evidence). Mean inspection time increased only marginally with CADe (MD, 0.47 minute [CI, 0.23 to 0.72 minute]; moderate-certainty evidence). LIMITATIONS This review focused on surrogates of patient-important outcomes. Most patients, however, may consider cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality important outcomes. The effect of CADe on such patient-important outcomes remains unclear. CONCLUSION The use of CADe for polyp detection during colonoscopy results in increased detection of adenomas but not advanced adenomas and in higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE European Commission Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy (C.H., M.S., A.R.)
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy (C.H., M.S., A.R.)
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan (Y.M.)
| | - Farid Foroutan
- Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (F.F.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy (A.Facciorusso)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (P.G.)
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (G.T., K.T.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (G.T., K.T.)
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, Ariccia, and Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (G.A.)
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy (K.K., T.R.)
| | - Tommy Rizkala
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy (K.K., T.R.)
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway (P.O.V.)
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy (A.Fugazza, L.C.)
| | | | - Jeremy R Glissen-Brown
- Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.R.G.)
| | - Shunsuke Kamba
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (S.K.)
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy (M.M.)
| | - Loredana Correale
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy (A.Fugazza, L.C.)
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom (P.B.)
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Alicante ISABIAL, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain (R.J.)
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri (P.S.)
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (D.K.R.)
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy (C.H., M.S., A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vasilakis T, Ziogas D, Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Koukoulioti E, Kapizioni C, Triantafyllou K, Facciorusso A, Papanikolaou IS. EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New? Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2176. [PMID: 37443568 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are intramural lesions that arise underneath the gastric mucosa. SELs can be benign, but can also be malignant or have malignant potential. Therefore, correct diagnosis is crucial. Endosonography has been established as the diagnostic gold standard. Although the identification of some of these lesions can be carried out immediately, solely based on their echo characteristics, for certain lesions histological examination is necessary. Sometimes histology can be inconclusive, especially for smaller lesions. Therefore, new methods have been developed in recent years to assist decision making, such as contrast enhanced endosonography, EUS elastography, and artificial intelligence systems. In this narrative review we provide a complete overview of the gastric SELs and summarize the new data of the last ten years concerning the diagnostic advances of endosonography on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Vasilakis
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Clinic, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Ziogas
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou Str., 11525 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Str., Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Str., Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Koukoulioti
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Section of Gastroenterology, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pennazio M, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Triantafyllou K, Gralnek IM. Diagnosis and management of small-bowel bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101844. [PMID: 37652647 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Small-bowel (SB) bleeding is a challenging problem for the clinician, presenting many pitfalls in both diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) have revolutionized the approach to the patient with SB bleeding, allowing for the endoscopic diagnosis and management of what was previously only a surgical matter. The patients' assessment in SB bleeding is of foremost importance, as treatment success relies on a detailed evaluation of clinical history, suspicion for underlying lesions, and a careful selection and timing of diagnostic and therapeutic tools. This review will summarize current state-of-the-art evidence and practice points, to provide the clinician with a comprehensive guide towards the management of SB bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Manthopoulou E, Ramai D, Ioannou A, Gkolfakis P, Papanikolaou IS, Mangiavillano B, Triantafyllou K, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition beyond the pancreas. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:257-266. [PMID: 37144012 PMCID: PMC10152811 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers the ability to obtain tissue material via a fine needle under direct visualization for cytological or pathological examination. Prior studies have looked at EUS tissue acquisition; however, most reports have been centered around lesions of the pancreas. This paper aims to review the literature on EUS tissue acquisition in other organs (beyond the pancreas) such as the liver, biliary tree, lymph nodes, and upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. Furthermore, techniques for obtaining tissue samples under EUS guidance continue to evolve. Specifically, some of the techniques that endoscopists employ are suction techniques (i.e., dry heparin, dry suction technique, wet suction technique), the slow pull technique, and the fanning technique. Apart from acquisition techniques, the type and size of the needle utilized play a major role in the quality of samples. This review describes the indications for tissue acquisition for each organ, and also describes and compares the various tissue acquisition techniques, as well as the different needles used according to their shape and size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Manthopoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Savvas Oncology Hospital of Athens, Greece (Eleni Manthopoulou)
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (Daryl Ramai)
| | - Alexandros Ioannou
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Alexandros Ioannou)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘‘Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy (Benedetto Mangiavillano)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘‘Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy (Stefano Francesco Crinò)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lee PJ, Lahooti A, Culp S, Boutsicaris A, Holovach P, Wozniak K, Lahooti I, Paragomi P, Hinton A, Pothoulakis I, Talukdar R, Kochhar R, Goenka MK, Gulla A, Gonzalez JA, Singh V, Bogado MF, Stevens T, Babu ST, Nawaz H, Gutierrez SC, Zarnescu N, Capurso G, Easler J, Triantafyllou K, Peláez Luna M, Thakkar S, Ocampo C, de-Madaria E, Cote GA, Wu BU, Hart PA, Krishna SG, Lara L, Han S, Papachristou GI. Obesity and alcoholic etiology as risk factors for multisystem organ failure in acute pancreatitis: Multinational study. United European Gastroenterol J 2023; 11:383-391. [PMID: 37096304 PMCID: PMC10165322 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multisystem organ failure (MSOF) is the most important determinant of mortality in acute pancreatitis (AP). Obesity and alcoholic etiology have been examined as potential risk factors for MSOF, but prior studies have not adequately elucidated their independent effects on the risk of MSOF. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the adjusted effects of body mass index (BMI) and alcoholic etiology on the risk of MSOF in subjects with AP. METHODS A prospective observational study of 22 centers from 10 countries was conducted. Patients admitted to an APPRENTICE consortium center with AP between August 2015 and January 2018 were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted effects of BMI, etiology, and other relevant covariates on the risk of MSOF. Models were stratified by sex. RESULTS Among 1544 AP subjects, there was a sex-dependent association between BMI and the risk of MSOF. Increasing BMI was associated with increased odds of MSOF in males (OR 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.15) but not in females (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.1). Male subjects with AP, whose BMIs were 30-34 and >35 kg/m2 , had odds ratios of 3.78 (95% CI 1.62-8.83) and 3.44 (95% CI 1.08-9.99), respectively. In females, neither higher grades of obesity nor increasing age increased the risk of MSOF. Alcoholic etiology was independently associated with increased odds of MSOF compared with non-alcohol etiologies (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.16-8.05). CONCLUSION Patients with alcoholic etiology and obese men (but not women) are at substantially increased risk of MSOF in AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ali Lahooti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey Culp
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Andrew Boutsicaris
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Phillip Holovach
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kayla Wozniak
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ila Lahooti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Pedram Paragomi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Aiste Gulla
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Vikesh Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, John Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Sorin Traian Babu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Haq Nawaz
- Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine, USA
| | | | - Narcis Zarnescu
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jeffrey Easler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Mario Peláez Luna
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán-Universidad-Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Division of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Carlos Ocampo
- Hospital General de Argudos "Dr. Cosme Argerich", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Enrique de-Madaria
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL - Fundación FISABIO), Alicante, Spain
| | - Gregory A Cote
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Phil A Hart
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Somashekar G Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Luis Lara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Georgios I Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Leite G, Papanikolaou IS, Xirouchakis E, Panayiotides IG, Karageorgos A, Millan MJ, Mathur R, Weitsman S, Dimitriadis GD, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Pimentel M, Triantafyllou K. Prevalence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Syndrome in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Microorganisms 2023; 11:723. [PMID: 36985296 PMCID: PMC10057935 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11030723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a multifactorial, wide-spectrum liver disorder. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by an increase in the number and/or type of colonic bacteria in the upper gastrointestinal tract. SIBO, through energy salvage and induction of inflammation, may be a pathophysiological factor for NAFLD development and progression. AIM/METHODS Consecutive patients with histological, biochemical, or radiological diagnosis of any stage of NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver [NAFL], non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH], cirrhosis) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Duodenal fluid (2cc) was aspirated from the 3rd-4th part of duodenum into sterile containers. SIBO was defined as ≥103 aerobic colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of duodenal aspirate and/or the presence of colonic-type bacteria. Patients without any liver disease undergoing gastroscopy due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) comprised the healthy control (HC) group. Concentrations (pg/mL) of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 were also measured in the duodenal fluid. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prevalence of SIBO in NAFLD patients, while the comparison of SIBO prevalence among NAFLD patients and healthy controls was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS We enrolled 125 patients (51 NAFL, 27 NASH, 17 cirrhosis, and 30 HC) aged 54 ± 11.9 years and with a weight of 88.3 ± 19.6 kg (NAFLD vs. HC 90.7 ± 19.1 vs. 80.8 ± 19.6 kg, p = 0.02). Overall, SIBO was diagnosed in 23/125 (18.4%) patients, with Gram-negative bacteria being the predominant species (19/23; 82.6%). SIBO prevalence was higher in the NAFLD cohort compared to HC (22/95; 23.2% vs. 1/30; 3.3%, p = 0.014). Patients with NASH had higher SIBO prevalence (6/27; 22.2%) compared to NAFL individuals (8/51; 15.7%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11). Patients with NASH-associated cirrhosis had a higher SIBO prevalence compared to patients with NAFL (8/17; 47.1% vs. 8/51; 15.7%, p = 0.02), while SIBO prevalence between patients with NASH-associated cirrhosis and NASH was not statistically different (8/17; 47.1% vs. 6/27; 22.2%, p = 0.11). Mean concentration of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 did not differ among the different groups. CONCLUSION The prevalence of SIBO is significantly higher in a cohort of patients with NAFLD compared to healthy controls. Moreover, SIBO is more prevalent in patients with NASH-associated cirrhosis compared to patients with NAFL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriela Leite
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Elias Xirouchakis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Athens Medical Palaio Faliron General Hospital, 17562 Palaio Faliron, Greece
| | - Ioannis G Panayiotides
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124622 Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Karageorgos
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Jesus Millan
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Ruchi Mathur
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Stacy Weitsman
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - George D Dimitriadis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Mark Pimentel
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kokoris S, Gavriilaki E, Vrigκou E, Triantafyllou K, Roumelioti A, Kyriakou E, Lada E, Gialeraki A, Kalantzis D, Grouzi E. Anemia in Celiac Disease: Multiple Aspects of the Same Coin. Acta Haematol 2023; 146:82-87. [PMID: 36380606 DOI: 10.1159/000527463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Extraintestinal manifestations of celiac disease (CD) are an integral part of the disease's clinical profile and, frequently, appear as the presenting feature. Given that anemia in CD may be multifactorial, increased awareness is needed on the part of treating physicians, and especially hematologists, to screen for CD. In this study, we highlight anemia as the presenting feature of CD which has remained undiagnosed for several years. In patients with a positive antibody testing or high suspicion of CD, endoscopy with a biopsy of the small intestine is performed, as it is considered the "gold standard" for diagnosing CD. Since most of the manifestations of CD are preventable or treatable with a gluten-free diet, an early diagnosis is vital for the prevention of serious and potentially lethal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Styliani Kokoris
- Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Gavriilaki
- Hematology Department - BMT Unit, G Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Vrigκou
- Second Department of Critical Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic and Research Institute, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Roumelioti
- Department of Hematology and Lymphoma BMTU, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Elias Kyriakou
- Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelia Lada
- Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Argyri Gialeraki
- Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Kalantzis
- Laboratory of Hematology and Blood Bank Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Elisavet Grouzi
- Department of Transfusion Service and Clinical Hemostasis, "Saint Savvas" Oncology Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Papaefthymiou A, Ramai D, Maida M, Tziatzios G, Viesca MFY, Papanikolaou I, Paraskeva K, Triantafyllou K, Repici A, Hassan C, Binda C, Beyna T, Facciorusso A, Arvanitakis M, Gkolfakis P. Performance and safety of motorized spiral enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:849-858.e5. [PMID: 36738795 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The introduction of motorized spiral enteroscopy (mSe) into clinical practice holds diagnostic and therapeutic potential for small bowel investigation. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the performance of this modality in diagnosing and treating small bowel lesions. METHODS A systematic search in Medline and Cochrane databases were performed through September 2022. The primary outcome was diagnostic success, defined as the identification of a lesion relative to the indication. Secondary outcomes included successful therapeutic manipulations, total enteroscopy rate (examination from the duodenojejunal flexion to the cecum), technical success (passage from the ligament of Treitz or ileocecal valve for anterograde and retrograde approach, respectively) and complication rates. We performed meta-analyses using a random effects model and the results were reported as percentages with 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CIs). RESULTS From 2016 to 2022 nine studies [959 patients; 42% females; mean age>45 years; 474 (49.4%) investigated for mid GI bleeding/anemia) were considered eligible and included in analysis. The diagnostic success rate of mSE was 78% (95%CI:72-84; I2=78.3%). Considering secondary outcomes, total enteroscopy was attempted in 460 cases, and completed with a rate of 51% (95%CI:30-72; I2=96.2%), whereas therapeutic interventions were successful in 98% (95%CI:96-100; I2=79.8%) of cases where attempted. Technical success rates were 96% (95%CI:94-97; I2=1.5%) for anterograde and 97% (95%CI:94-100; I2=38.6%) for retrograde approaches, respectively. Finally, the incidence of complications was 17% (95%CI:13-21; I2=65.1%), albeit the vast majority included minor adverse events [16% (95%CI: 11-20; I2=67.2%) vs major= 1% (95%CI:0-1; I2=0%)]. CONCLUSIONS Motorized spiral enteroscopy provides high rates of diagnostic and therapeutic success with a low prevalence of severe adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London, UK; First Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", Athens, Greece
| | - Michael Fernandez Y Viesca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Greece
| | - Konstantina Paraskeva
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Greece
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Evagelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Department of Internal Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia "Konstantopoulio-Patision", Athens, Greece;; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Leite G, Mathur R, Damoraki G, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Triantafyllou K. Probiotics in Functional Dyspepsia. Microorganisms 2023; 11:microorganisms11020351. [PMID: 36838317 PMCID: PMC9964889 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder in everyday clinical practice identified nowadays as a multi-factorial, difficult to treat condition with a significant burden on patients' quality of life (QoL) and healthcare systems worldwide. Despite its high prevalence in the general population, the precise etiology of the disorder remains elusive, with its pathophysiological spectrum evolving over time, including variable potential mechanisms, i.e., impaired gastric accommodation, gastric motor disorders, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, disorders of the brain-gut axis, as well as less evident ones, i.e., altered duodenal microbiota composition and genetic susceptibility. In light of these implications, a definitive, universal treatment that could be beneficial for all FD patients is not available yet. Recently, probiotics have been suggested to be an effective therapeutic option that could alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), potentially due to anti-inflammatory properties or by modulating the complex bidirectional interactions between gastrointestinal microbiota and host crosstalk; however, their impact on the multiple aspects of FD remains ambiguous. In this review, we aim to summarize all currently available evidence for the efficacy of probiotics as a novel therapeutic approach for FD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital, 3–5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Street, Nea Ionia, 142 33 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-213-2057000
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital, 3–5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Street, Nea Ionia, 142 33 Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriela Leite
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Ruchi Mathur
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Georgia Damoraki
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine—Propaedeutic, Medical School, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, “Attikon” University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Frazzoni L, Laterza L, La Marca M, Zagari RM, Radaelli F, Hassan C, Repici A, Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Spada C, Triantafyllou K, Bazzoli F, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Fuccio L. Clinical value of alarm features for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2023; 55:458-468. [PMID: 36241197 DOI: 10.1055/a-1961-4266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common neoplasm in Western countries. Prioritizing access to colonoscopy appears of critical relevance. Alarm features are considered to increase the likelihood of CRC. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of alarm features for CRC diagnosis. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of alarm features (rectal bleeding, anemia, change in bowel habit, and weight loss) for CRC, published up to September 2021. Colonoscopy was required as the reference diagnostic test. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled by a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. The number needed to scope (NNS; i. e. the number of patients who need to undergo colonoscopy to diagnose one CRC) according to each alarm feature was calculated. RESULTS 31 studies with 45 100 patients (mean age 31-88 years; men 36 %-63 %) were included. The prevalence of CRC ranged from 0.2 % to 22 %. Sensitivity was suboptimal, ranging from 12.4 % for weight loss to 49 % for rectal bleeding, whereas specificity ranged from 69.8 % for rectal bleeding to 91.9 % for weight loss. Taken individually, rectal bleeding and anemia would be the only practical alarm features mandating colonoscopy (NNS 5.3 and 6.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS When considered independently, alarm features have variable accuracy for CRC, given the high heterogeneity of study populations reflected by wide variability in CRC prevalence. Rectal bleeding and anemia are the most practical to select patients for colonoscopy. Integration of alarm features in a comprehensive evaluation of patients should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Frazzoni
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Liboria Laterza
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marina La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Franco Bazzoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.,RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Tziatzios G, Lester J, Crinò SF, Frazzoni L, Papanikolaou IS, Arvanitakis M, Blero D, Lemmers A, Eisendrath P, Fuccio L, Triantafyllou K, Gabbrielli A, Devière J. Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:33-44.e9. [PMID: 34666153 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Several endoscopic methods have been proposed for the treatment of large biliary stones. We assessed the comparative efficacy of these treatments through a network meta-analysis. METHODS Nineteen randomized controlled trials (2752 patients) comparing different treatments for management of large bile stones (>10 mm) (endoscopic sphincterotomy, balloon sphincteroplasty, sphincterotomy followed by endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation [S+EPLBD], mechanical lithotripsy, single-operator cholangioscopy [SOC]) with each other were identified. Study outcomes were the success rate of stone removal and the incidence of adverse events. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis for all treatments, and used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria to appraise the quality of evidence. RESULTS All treatments except mechanical lithotripsy significantly outperformed sphincterotomy in terms of stone removal rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.03-1.29). SOC was superior to other adjunctive interventions (vs balloon sphincteroplasty [RR, 1.24; 95% CIs, 1.07-1.45], vs S+EPLBD [RR, 1.23; range, 1.06-1.42] and vs mechanical lithotripsy [RR, 1.34; range, 1.14-1.58]). Cholangioscopy ranked the highest in increasing the success rate of stone removal (surface under the cumulative ranking [SUCRA] score, 0.99) followed by S+EPLBD (SUCRA score, 0.68). SOC and S+EPLBD outperformed the other modalities when only studies reporting on stones greater than 15 mm were taken into consideration (SUCRA scores, 0.97 and 0.71, respectively). None of the assessed interventions was significantly different in terms of adverse event rate compared with endoscopic sphincterotomy or with other treatments. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding were the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with large bile stones, cholangioscopy represents the most effective method, in particular in patients with larger (>15 mm) stones, whereas S+EPLBD could represent a less expensive and more widely available alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Janice Lester
- Health Science Library, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Boogna, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Blero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Sant Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Boogna, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gkolfakis P, Kapizioni C, Tziatzios G, Facciorusso A, Frazzoni L, Thomopoulos K, Potamianos S, Christodoulou D, Papadopoulos V, Fuccio L, Hassan C, Triantafyllou K. Comparative performance and external validation of three different scores in predicting inadequate bowel preparation among Greek inpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:25-31. [PMID: 36593808 PMCID: PMC9756024 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Predictive scores aim to predict bowel preparation adequacy among hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of these scores in predicting inadequate bowel cleansing in a cohort of Greek inpatients. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of data generated from a cohort of inpatients undergoing colonoscopy in 4 tertiary Greek centers to validate the 3 models currently available (models A, B and C). We used the Akaike information criterion to quantify the performance of each model, while Harrell's C-index, as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), verified the discriminative ability to predict inadequate bowel prep. Primary endpoint was the comparison of performance among models for predicting inadequate bowel cleansing. Results Overall, 261 patients-121 (46.4%) female, 100 (38.3%) bedridden, mean age 70.7±15.4 years-were included in the analysis. Model B showed the highest performance (Harrell's C-index: AUC 77.2% vs. 72.6% and 57.5%, compared to models A and C, respectively). It also achieved higher performance for the subgroup of mobilized inpatients (Harrell's C-index: AUC 72.21% vs. 64.97% and 59.66%, compared to models A and C, respectively). Model B also performed better in predicting patients with incomplete colonoscopy due to inadequate bowel preparation (Harrell's C-index: AUC 74.23% vs. 69.07% and 52.76%, compared to models A and C, respectively). Conclusions Predictive model B outperforms its comparators in the prediction of inpatients with inadequate bowel preparation. This model is particularly advantageous when used to evaluate mobilized inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke‘s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Christina Kapizioni)
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, IRCSS- S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy (Leonardo Frazzoni Lorenzo Fuccio)
| | - Konstantinos Thomopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece (Konstantinos Thomopoulos)
| | - Spyros Potamianos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece (Spyros Potamianos)
| | - Dimitrios Christodoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (Dimitrios Christodoulou)
| | - Vasilios Papadopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Koutlimbaneio & Triantafylleio General Hospital, Larissa, Greece (Vasilios Papadopoulos)
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, IRCSS- S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy (Leonardo Frazzoni Lorenzo Fuccio)
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (Cesare Hassan)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Georgios Tziatzios, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Despott EJ, Dray X, Keuchel M, Moreels T, Sanders DS, Spada C, Carretero C, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Elli L, Fuccio L, Gonzalez Suarez B, Koulaouzidis A, Kunovsky L, McNamara D, Neumann H, Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez E, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Piccirelli S, Rosa B, Saurin JC, Sidhu R, Tacheci I, Vlachou E, Triantafyllou K. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2023; 55:58-95. [PMID: 36423618 DOI: 10.1055/a-1973-3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne University, Endoscopy Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tom Moreels
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David S Sanders
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Carretero
- Department of Gastroenterology. University of Navarre Clinic, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Begona Gonzalez Suarez
- Gastroenterology Department - ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, DIBAPS, CiBERHED, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Centre for Clinical Implementation of Capsule Endoscopy, Store Adenomer Tidlige Cancere Center, Svendborg, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lumir Kunovsky
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefania Piccirelli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Bruno Rosa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ilja Tacheci
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | | | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Panagiotopoulos I, Mulita F, Verras GI, Katinioti A, Samaras A, Tasios K, Bouchagier K, Triantafyllou K. Cold Reactive Proteins in Cardiovascular Surgery. Mater Sociomed 2022; 34:301. [PMID: 36936896 PMCID: PMC10019872 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2022.34.301-304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background According to the literature, Cryoglobins, Cold Agglutinins, Donath-Landsteiner antibodies, and Cryofibrinogen arethe 4 types of Cold-Reactive proteins described. Objective The aim of the study was to show the role of these proteins cardiovascular surgery. Case presentation A 57-year-old male patient with a history of myocardial infarction 6 years ago, heavy smoker until 1 year ago, with diabetes, was admitted to the hospital for a surgical confrontation of coronary disease. He reports that for1-month symptoms are deteriorating (NYHA III). The history of the patient does not include either hematopoietic system or connective tissue diseases or recent viral infection. Angiographic control showed total obstruction of the small branch. The patient underwent median sternotomy. Suspension of the left sternum. Mobilization of the left internal mammary artery. Concomitant reception of left great saphenous vein. Intubation of ascending aorta and right atrium - vena cava with acatheter of two steps. He was extubated at the 10th post-surgical hour. Smooth post-surgical progression, with no signs of brain, myocardial or renal failure. The patient was discharged on the 5th post-surgical day. Conclusion Independently of the technique that is used, the systemic temperature must be maintained duringthe cardiopulmonary bypass above the temperature threshold activity of the cold-reactiveproteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesk Mulita
- Surgical Department, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Angelos Samaras
- Surgical Department, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Chandan S, Mohan BP, Crinò SF. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid on-site evaluation for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:458-465. [PMID: 36537383 PMCID: PMC9921973 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in patients with pancreatic masses is still matter of debate. Aim of our meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic outcomes of these two tissue acquisition strategies. Computerized bibliographic search on the main databases was performed through December 2021 and 8 studies were identified (2147 patients). The primary outcome was sample adequacy. Pooled effects were calculated using a random-effects model by means of DerSimonian and Laird test and summary estimates were expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) or mean difference and 95% confidence Interval (CI). There was no difference in terms of baseline variables between the two groups. Pooled sample adequacy was 95.5% (95% CI 93.2%-97.8%) and 88.9% (83.4%-94.5%) in the EUS-FNB + ROSE and EUS-FNB groups, respectively (OR = 2.05, 0.94-4.49; P = 0.07). Diagnostic accuracy resulted significantly superior in the EUS-FNB + ROSE group (OR = 2.49, 1.08-5.73; P = 0.03), particularly when the analysis was restricted to reverse bevel needle (OR = 3.24, 1.19-8.82, P = 0.02), whereas no statistical difference was observed when newer end-cutting needles were used (OR = 0.71, 0.29-3.61, P = 0.56). Diagnostic sensitivity was not significantly different between the two groups (OR = 1.94, 0.84-4.49; P = 0.12), whereas pooled specificity was 100% with both approaches. The number of needle passes needed to obtain diagnostic samples was not significantly different (mean difference 0.07,-0.22 to 0.37; P = 0.62). Our meta-analysis stands for a non-superiority of EUS-FNB + ROSE over EUS-FNB with newer end-cutting needles, whereas ROSE could have still a role when reverse bevel needles are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy,Address for correspondence Dr. Antonio Facciorusso, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia. AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy. E-mail:
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology Unit, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tziatzios G, Papaefthymiou A, Facciorusso A, Papanikolaou IS, Antonelli G, Marco S, Frazzoni L, Fuccio L, Paraskeva KD, Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P, Rex DK, Triantafyllou K, Messmann H, Gkolfakis P. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022:S1590-8658(22)00741-1. [PMID: 36336608 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various endoscopic resection techniques have been proposed for the treatment of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-20 mm, however the optimal technique still remains unclear. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), investigating the efficacy of endoscopic treatments for the management of 6-20 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. Primary outcomes were complete and en bloc resection rates and adverse event rate was the secondary. Effect size on outcomes is presented as risk ratio (RR; 95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS Fourteen RCTs (5219 polypectomies) were included. Endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) significantly outperformed cold snare polypectomy(CSP) in terms of complete [(RR 95%CI): 1.04(1.00-1.07)] and en bloc resection rate [RR:1.12(1.04-1.21)]. EMR was superior to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) [RR:1.04(1.00-1.08)] regarding complete resection, while underwater EMR (U-EMR) achieved significantly higher rate of en bloc resection compared to CSP [RR:1.15(1.01-1.30)]. EMR yielded the highest ranking for complete resection(SUCRA-score 0.81), followed by cold-snare EMR(CS-EMR,SUCRA-score 0.76). None of the modalities was different regarding adverse event rate compared to CSP, however EMR and CS-EMR resulted in fewer adverse events compared to HSP [RR:0.44(0.26-0.77) and 0.43(0.21-0.87),respectively]. CONCLUSION EMR achieved the highest performance in resecting 6-20 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, with this effect being consistent for polyps 6-9 and ≥10 mm; findings supported by very low quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | | | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia AOU, Ospedali Riunity Viale Pinto, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Giulio Antonelli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Ariccia, Rome, Italy
| | - Spadaccini Marco
- Department of Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas, United States; Division of Gastroenterology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Kansas, Missouri, United States
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ''Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gralnek IM, Camus Duboc M, Garcia-Pagan JC, Fuccio L, Karstensen JG, Hucl T, Jovanovic I, Awadie H, Hernandez-Gea V, Tantau M, Ebigbo A, Ibrahim M, Vlachogiannakos J, Burgmans MC, Rosasco R, Triantafyllou K. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1094-1120. [PMID: 36174643 DOI: 10.1055/a-1939-4887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends that patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD; due to viruses, alcohol, and/or nonobese [BMI < 30 kg/m2] nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) and clinically significant portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] > 10 mmHg and/or liver stiffness by transient elastography > 25 kPa) should receive, if no contraindications, nonselective beta blocker (NSBB) therapy (preferably carvedilol) to prevent the development of variceal bleeding.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends that in those patients unable to receive NSBB therapy with a screening upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy that demonstrates high risk esophageal varices, endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is the endoscopic prophylactic treatment of choice. EBL should be repeated every 2-4 weeks until variceal eradication is achieved. Thereafter, surveillance EGD should be performed every 3-6 months in the first year following eradication.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends, in hemodynamically stable patients with acute upper GI hemorrhage (UGIH) and no history of cardiovascular disease, a restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy, with a hemoglobin threshold of ≤ 70 g/L prompting RBC transfusion. A post-transfusion target hemoglobin of 70-90 g/L is desired.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 : ESGE recommends that patients with ACLD presenting with suspected acute variceal bleeding be risk stratified according to the Child-Pugh score and MELD score, and by documentation of active/inactive bleeding at the time of upper GI endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5 : ESGE recommends the vasoactive agents terlipressin, octreotide, or somatostatin be initiated at the time of presentation in patients with suspected acute variceal bleeding and be continued for a duration of up to 5 days.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 6 : ESGE recommends antibiotic prophylaxis using ceftriaxone 1 g/day for up to 7 days for all patients with ACLD presenting with acute variceal hemorrhage, or in accordance with local antibiotic resistance and patient allergies.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 7 : ESGE recommends, in the absence of contraindications, intravenous erythromycin 250 mg be given 30-120 minutes prior to upper GI endoscopy in patients with suspected acute variceal hemorrhage.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 8 : ESGE recommends that, in patients with suspected variceal hemorrhage, endoscopic evaluation should take place within 12 hours from the time of patient presentation provided the patient has been hemodynamically resuscitated.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 9 : ESGE recommends EBL for the treatment of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH).Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 10 : ESGE recommends that, in patients at high risk for recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding following successful endoscopic hemostasis (Child-Pugh C ≤ 13 or Child-Pugh B > 7 with active EVH at the time of endoscopy despite vasoactive agents, or HVPG > 20 mmHg), pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) within 72 hours (preferably within 24 hours) must be considered.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 11 : ESGE recommends that, for persistent esophageal variceal bleeding despite vasoactive pharmacological and endoscopic hemostasis therapy, urgent rescue TIPS should be considered (where available).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 12 : ESGE recommends endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for acute gastric (cardiofundal) variceal (GOV2, IGV1) hemorrhage.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 13: ESGE recommends endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or EBL in patients with GOV1-specific bleeding.Strong recommendations, moderate quality evidence. 14: ESGE suggests urgent rescue TIPS or balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for gastric variceal bleeding when there is a failure of endoscopic hemostasis or early recurrent bleeding.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 15: ESGE recommends that patients who have undergone EBL for acute EVH should be scheduled for follow-up EBLs at 1- to 4-weekly intervals to eradicate esophageal varices (secondary prophylaxis).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 16: ESGE recommends the use of NSBBs (propranolol or carvedilol) in combination with endoscopic therapy for secondary prophylaxis in EVH in patients with ACLD.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Marine Camus Duboc
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA) & Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Endoscopic Center, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan
- Barcelona Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Hospital Clinic, Health Care Provider of the European Reference Network on Rare Liver Disorders (ERN-Liver), Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCSS-S. Orsola-Malpighi, Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - John Gásdal Karstensen
- Gastroenterology Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ivan Jovanovic
- Euromedik Health Care System, Visegradska General Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Halim Awadie
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Virginia Hernandez-Gea
- Barcelona Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Hospital Clinic, Health Care Provider of the European Reference Network on Rare Liver Disorders (ERN-Liver), Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marcel Tantau
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu' Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alanna Ebigbo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Jiannis Vlachogiannakos
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marc C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gkolfakis P, Papaefthymiou A, Facciorusso A, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Dritsas S, Florou T, Papanikolaou IS, Hassan C, Repici A, Triantafyllou K, Aabakken L, Devière J, Beyna T, Arvanitakis M. Comparison between Enteroscopy-, Laparoscopy- and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12101646. [PMID: 36295081 PMCID: PMC9605390 DOI: 10.3390/life12101646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in surgically altered anatomy (SAA), can be challenging and the optimal technique selection remains debatable. Most common foregut interventions resulting to this burden consist of Billroth II gastrectomy, Whipple surgery and Roux-en-Y anastomoses, including gastric by-pass. This systematic review, with meta-analysis, aimed to compare the rates of successful enteroscope-assisted (EA)-, endosonography-directed transgastric- (EDGE), and laparoscopy-assisted (LA)-ERCP. Methods: A systematic research (Medline) was performed for relative studies, through January 2022. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as approaching the ampulla site. Secondary outcomes included the desired duct cannulation, successful therapeutic manipulations, and complication rates. We performed meta-analyses of pooled data, and subgroup analysis considering the EA-ERCP subtypes (spiral-, double and single balloon-enteroscope). Pooled rates are reported as percentages with 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CIs). Results: Seventy-six studies were included (3569 procedures). Regarding primary outcome, EA-ERCP was the least effective [87.3% (95%CI: 85.3–89.4); I2: 91.0%], whereas EDGE and LA-ERCP succeeded in 97.9% (95%CI: 96.4–99.4; I2: 0%) and 99.1% (95%CI: 98.6–99.7; I2: 0%), respectively. Similarly, duct cannulation and therapeutic success rates were 74.7% (95%CI: 71.3–78.0; I2: 86.9%) and 69.1% (95%CI: 65.3–72.9; I2: 91.8%) after EA-ERCP, 98% (95%CI: 96.5–99.6; I2: 0%) and 97.9% (95%CI: 96.3–99.4) after EDGE, and 98.6% (95%CI: 97.9–99.2; I2: 0%) and 98.5% (95%CI: 97.8–99.2; I2: 0%) after LA-ERCP, respectively. The noticed high heterogeneity in EA-ERCP results probably reflects the larger number of included studies, the different enteroscopy modalities and the variety of surgical interventions. Comparisons revealed the superiority of LA-ERCP and EDGE over EA-ERCP (p ≤ 0.001) for all success-related outcomes, though LA-ERCP and EDGE were comparable (p ≥ 0.43). ERCP with spiral-enteroscope was inferior to balloon-enteroscope, while the type of the balloon-enteroscope did not affect the results. Most adverse events were recorded after LA-ERCP [15.1% (95%CI: 9.40–20.8); I2: 87.1%], and EDGE [13.1% (95%CI: 7.50–18.8); I2: 48.2%], significantly differing from EA-ERCP [5.7% (95%CI: 4.50–6.80); p ≤ 0.04; I2: 64.2%]. Conclusions: LA-ERCP and EDGE were associated with higher technical, cannulation, and therapeutic success compared to EA-ERCP, though accompanied with more adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, 124 62 Chaidari, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-6942259009
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Spyridon Dritsas
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil BA21 4AT, UK
| | - Theodosia Florou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, 411 10 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, 124 62 Chaidari, Greece
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, 124 62 Chaidari, Greece
| | - Lars Aabakken
- GI Endoscopy Unit, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evagelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tachmatzidis D, Mouselimis D, Tsarouchas A, Filos D, Antoniadis AP, Lysitsas DN, Mezilis N, Sakellaropoulou A, Giannopoulos G, Bakogiannis C, Triantafyllou K, Fragakis N, Efremidis M, Chouvarda I, Vassilikos VP. P-wave beat-to-beat analysis to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Identification of patients prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) relapse after catheter ablation is essential for better patient selection and risk stratification.
Purpose
The current prospective cohort study aims to validate a novel P-wave index based on beat-to-beat (B2B) P-wave morphological and wavelet analysis designed to detect patients with low burden AF, as a predictor of AF recurrence within a year after successful catheter ablation.
Methods
12-lead ECG and 10-minute vectorcardiogram (VCG) recordings were obtained from 138 consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation. Pre-ablation B2B P-wave index, along with standard P-wave indices, clinical scores and patients history and physical examination parameters were evaluated as AF recurrence predictors.
Results
Univariate analysis revealed that patients with higher B2B P-wave index had a two-fold risk for AF recurrence (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.24–4.44, p: 0.010). Prolonged P-wave, interatrial block, early AF recurrence, female gender, heart failure history, previous stroke, and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 were also found to be related to higher recurrence rate. Multivariate analysis of predictors that can be assessed before ablation revealed that B2B P-wave index, along with heart failure history and history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack are independent predicting factors of AF relapse.
Conclusion
B2B P-wave morphology and wavelet analysis, is a promising, non-invasive technique, able to identify patients prone to AF recurrence after pulmonary veins ablation. Further studies are needed to assess the predictive value of B2B index with greater accuracy and evaluate a possible relationship with atrial substrate analysis.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Hellenic Society of Cardiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Tachmatzidis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - D Mouselimis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - A Tsarouchas
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - D Filos
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Lab of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, School of Medicine , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - A P Antoniadis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | | | - N Mezilis
- Agios Loukas Hospital , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - A Sakellaropoulou
- Evangelismos Hospital, 2nd Cardiology Department, Electrophysiology Laboratory , Athens , Greece
| | - G Giannopoulos
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - C Bakogiannis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - K Triantafyllou
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - N Fragakis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - M Efremidis
- Evangelismos Hospital, 2nd Cardiology Department, Electrophysiology Laboratory , Athens , Greece
| | - I Chouvarda
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Lab of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, School of Medicine , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - V P Vassilikos
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 3rd Cardiology Department , Thessaloniki , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fragakis N, Antoniadis A, Sotiriadou M, Virgiliou C, Ballauri I, Gika H, Boulmpou A, Triantafyllou K, Vergopoulos S, Bakogiannis C, Papadopoulos C, Tzikas S, Karamitsos T, Vassilikos V. Syncopal patients without prodromes exhibit a diverse pattern of adenosine release during head-up tilt test. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
In a significant proportion of patients with neurally-mediated syncope (NMS), the mechanism of syncope remains largely undetermined. Adenosine has been proposed as a central humoral factor in various forms of NMS: high Adenosine Plasma Levels (ADP) are encountered in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS), low ADP in non-prodromes syncope (NPS), while ADP in patients with situational syncope SS are less well determined.
Purpose
We sought to assess ADP in patients with different clinical forms of syncope, with an emphasis on the presence or absence of prodromal symptoms, as well as the relation between ADP and the outcomes of Head-Up Tilt Table Test (HUTT) and Adenosine test (ADT).
Methods
Patients with different clinical types of NMS (n=124), i.e., VVS, NPS, or SS, were investigated using a standard protocol including HUTT and ADT. During HUTT, ADP was measured in the supine position, at table tilting, and in syncope.
Results
Baseline ADP did not differ among groups. ADP at syncope were higher in NPS compared to VVS (1.55±1.29 vs 0.16±0.05 μM, p=0.03) and SS (0.15±0.05 μM, p=0.02). In NPS, ADP increased from the supine position to the time of syncope (0.47±0.25 to 1.55±1.29 μM, p=0.04). In VVS, ADP increased only from the supine to the tilt position (0.23±0.04 to 0.35±0.10 μMu, p=0.02), while in SS ADP did not change in any stage of HUTT. SS was associated with cardioinhibitory HUTT (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.05 to 9.56, p=0.04) and positive ADT (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.47 to 11.46, p=0.012).
Conclusion(s)
A distinct pattern of ADP increase is noted during HUTT in NPS, suggesting that an excessive increase of ADP may play the key role in triggering this type of clinical presentation of syncope independently of the baseline ADP. Cardioinhibition prevails in patients with SS without clear adenosine involvement. Such observations contribute to an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of different clinical forms of syncope which may offer the possibility to tailor the management approach appropriately.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Fragakis
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - A Antoniadis
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - M Sotiriadou
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - C Virgiliou
- Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - I Ballauri
- Analysi Iatriki A.E. Diagnostic Research Clinics , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - H Gika
- Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - A Boulmpou
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - K Triantafyllou
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - S Vergopoulos
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - C Bakogiannis
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - C Papadopoulos
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - S Tzikas
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - T Karamitsos
- AHEPA University General Hospital, 1st Department of Cardiology, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| | - V Vassilikos
- Hippokration General Hospital, 3rd Cardiology Department, Aristotle University Medical School , Thessaloniki , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lazaridis C, Bakogiannis C, Mouselimis D, Tsarouchas A, Antoniadis AP, Triantafyllou K, Fragakis N, Vassilikos VP. The usability and effect of an mHealth disease management platform on the quality of life of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation – The emPOWERD-AF study. Health Informatics J 2022; 28:14604582221139053. [DOI: 10.1177/14604582221139053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. myAlgos is an mHealth disease management system consisting of physician-oriented platform and patient-oriented smartphone app. Our purpose was to assess the usability of myAlgos by physicians and patients and the effect of myAlgos on the quality of life (QoL) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). Physicians rated the platform with the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). Patients rated the app with the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). The e-medicine Platform for Optimizing the Workflow in hEaRt Diseases (emPOWERD-AF) study investigated the effect of myAlgos in PAF patients randomized to full/control version. QoL was measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) and 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires. myAlgos got a PSSUQ score of 2.52 ± 0.36 by five physicians and a MAUQ score of 79.9% by 33 patients. In emPOWERD-AF, 80 patients were randomized 1:1 (58.1 ± 8.7 years, 66% male). The median AFEQT change at 6 months was +2.63% in full version users and −1.63% in controls ( p < .001). The myAlgos platform and app were easy-to-use and improved QoL in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Lazaridis
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Constantinos Bakogiannis
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mouselimis
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasios Tsarouchas
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Antonios P Antoniadis
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vassilios P Vassilikos
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; Third Cardiology Department, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rodríguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlović K, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Pellisé M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54:797-826. [PMID: 35803275 DOI: 10.1055/a-1859-3726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Climate change and the destruction of ecosystems by human activities are among the greatest challenges of the 21st century and require urgent action. Health care activities significantly contribute to the emission of greenhouse gases and waste production, with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy being one of the largest contributors. This Position Statement aims to raise awareness of the ecological footprint of GI endoscopy and provides guidance to reduce its environmental impact. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) outline suggestions and recommendations for health care providers, patients, governments, and industry. MAIN STATEMENTS 1: GI endoscopy is a resource-intensive activity with a significant yet poorly assessed environmental impact. 2: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adopting immediate actions to reduce the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 3: ESGE-ESGENA recommend adherence to guidelines and implementation of audit strategies on the appropriateness of GI endoscopy to avoid the environmental impact of unnecessary procedures. 4: ESGE-ESGENA recommend the embedding of reduce, reuse, and recycle programs in the GI endoscopy unit. 5: ESGE-ESGENA suggest that there is an urgent need to reassess and reduce the environmental and economic impact of single-use GI endoscopic devices. 6: ESGE-ESGENA suggest against routine use of single-use GI endoscopes. However, their use could be considered in highly selected patients on a case-by-case basis. 7: ESGE-ESGENA recommend inclusion of sustainability in the training curricula of GI endoscopy and as a quality domain. 8: ESGE-ESGENA recommend conducting high quality research to quantify and minimize the environmental impact of GI endoscopy. 9: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy companies assess, disclose, and audit the environmental impact of their value chain. 10: ESGE-ESGENA recommend that GI endoscopy should become a net-zero greenhouse gas emissions practice by 2050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, and Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Deepak Agrawal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robin Baddeley
- King's Health Partners Institute for Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital, and Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elzbieta Bak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Clinical Hospital of Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, and Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Patricia Burga
- Endoscopy Department, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Leigh Donnelly
- Endoscopy Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Northumberland, United Kingdom
| | - Axel Eickhoff
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie, Infektiologie, Klinikum Hanau, Hanau, Germany
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarina Karlović
- Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka , Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Department of Gastroenterology, University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital/IIS La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), and Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
| | - Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - William Stableforth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alberto Tringali
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana, Conegliano Hospital, Conegliano, Italy
| | - Andrew Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - George J Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catholic University of Leuven (KUL), TARGID, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Elli L, Marinoni B, Sidhu R, Bojarski C, Branchi F, Tontini GE, Chetcuti Zammit S, Khater S, Eliakim R, Rondonotti E, Saurin JC, Bruno M, Buchkremer J, Cadoni S, Cavallaro F, Dray X, Ellul P, Urien IF, Keuchel M, Kopylov U, Koulaouzidis A, Leenhardt R, Baltes P, Beaumont H, Marmo C, McNamara D, Mussetto A, Nemeth A, Cuadrado Robles EP, Perrod G, Rahmi G, Riccioni ME, Robertson A, Spada C, Toth E, Triantafyllou K, Wurm Johansson G, Rimondi A. Nomenclature and Definition of Atrophic Lesions in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Delphi Consensus Statement of the International CApsule endoscopy REsearch (I-CARE) Group. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071704. [PMID: 35885608 PMCID: PMC9325291 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Villous atrophy is an indication for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). However, SBCE findings are not described uniformly and atrophic features are sometimes not recognized; (2) Methods: The Delphi technique was employed to reach agreement among a panel of SBCE experts. The nomenclature and definitions of SBCE lesions suggesting the presence of atrophy were decided in a core group of 10 experts. Four images of each lesion were chosen from a large SBCE database and agreement on the correspondence between the picture and the definition was evaluated using the Delphi method in a broadened group of 36 experts. All images corresponded to histologically proven mucosal atrophy; (3) Results: Four types of atrophic lesions were identified: mosaicism, scalloping, folds reduction, and granular mucosa. The core group succeeded in reaching agreement on the nomenclature and the descriptions of these items. Consensus in matching the agreed definitions for the proposed set of images was met for mosaicism (88.9% in the first round), scalloping (97.2% in the first round), and folds reduction (94.4% in the first round), but granular mucosa failed to achieve consensus (75.0% in the third round); (4) Conclusions: Consensus among SBCE experts on atrophic lesions was met for the first time. Mosaicism, scalloping, and folds reduction are the most reliable signs, while the description of granular mucosa remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Elli
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (F.C.); (A.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-55-03-33-64
| | - Beatrice Marinoni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (F.C.); (A.R.)
- Postgraduate Specialization in Gastrointestinal Diseases, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK;
| | - Christian Bojarski
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (C.B.); (F.B.); (J.B.)
| | - Federica Branchi
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (C.B.); (F.B.); (J.B.)
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (F.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Stefania Chetcuti Zammit
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.C.Z.); (P.E.)
| | - Sherine Khater
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France; (S.K.); (E.P.C.R.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Gastroenterology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 52621, Israel; (R.E.); (U.K.)
| | | | - Jean Cristhophe Saurin
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 69002 Lyon, France;
| | - Mauro Bruno
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Juliane Buchkremer
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (C.B.); (F.B.); (J.B.)
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, CTO Hospital, 09016 Iglesias, Italy;
| | - Flaminia Cavallaro
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (F.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Xavier Dray
- Centre for Digestive Endoscopy, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP, 75012 Paris, France; (X.D.); (R.L.)
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (S.C.Z.); (P.E.)
| | | | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Hamburg, 21029 Hamburg, Germany; (M.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Gastroenterology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 52621, Israel; (R.E.); (U.K.)
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Medicine, Odense University Hospital (OUH)-Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Surgical Research Unit, OUH, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Romain Leenhardt
- Centre for Digestive Endoscopy, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP, 75012 Paris, France; (X.D.); (R.L.)
| | - Peter Baltes
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Hamburg, 21029 Hamburg, Germany; (M.K.); (P.B.)
| | - Hanneke Beaumont
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VU, 1118 Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Clelia Marmo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (C.M.); (M.E.R.); (C.S.)
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght University Hospital, D24 NR0A Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Alessandro Mussetto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, 48121 Ravenna, Italy;
| | - Artur Nemeth
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; (A.N.); (E.T.); (G.W.J.)
| | - Enrique Perez Cuadrado Robles
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France; (S.K.); (E.P.C.R.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
- Small Bowel Unit, Morales Meseguer Hospital, 30008 Murcia, Spain
| | - Guillame Perrod
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France; (S.K.); (E.P.C.R.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France; (S.K.); (E.P.C.R.); (G.P.); (G.R.)
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (C.M.); (M.E.R.); (C.S.)
| | - Alexander Robertson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK;
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy; (C.M.); (M.E.R.); (C.S.)
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Ervin Toth
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; (A.N.); (E.T.); (G.W.J.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, 157 72 Athens, Greece;
| | - Gabriele Wurm Johansson
- Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden; (A.N.); (E.T.); (G.W.J.)
| | - Alessandro Rimondi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; (B.M.); (F.C.); (A.R.)
- Postgraduate Specialization in Gastrointestinal Diseases, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tsimos KP, Korantzopoulos P, Arsenos P, Doundoulakis I, Tsiachris D, Antoniou CK, Krikonis K, Sideris S, Dilaveris P, Triantafyllou K, Soulaidopoulos S, Kanoupakis E, Fragakis N, Sideris A, Trachanas K, Iliodromitis E, Tousoulis D, Tsioufis K, Kolettis TM, Gatzoulis KA. Association of non-invasive electrocardiographic risk factors with left ventricular systolic function in post-myocardial infarction patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2022; 27:e12946. [PMID: 35795926 PMCID: PMC9484020 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electrocardiographic non‐invasive risk factors (NIRFs) have an important role in the arrhythmic risk stratification of post‐myocardial infarction (post‐MI) patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, their specific relation to left ventricular systolic function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between NIRFs and LVEF in the patients included in the PRESERVE‐EF trial. Methods We studied 575 post‐MI ischemia‐free patients with LVEF≥40% (mean age: 57.0 ± 10.4 years, 86.2% men). The following NIRFs were evaluated: premature ventricular complexes, non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), late potentials (LPs), prolonged QTc, increased T‐wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, and abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence. Results There was a statistically significant relationship between LPs (Chi‐squared = 4.975; p < .05), nsVT (Chi‐squared = 5.749, p < .05), PVCs (r= −.136; p < .01), and the LVEF. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that LPs (p = .001) and NSVT (p < .001) were significant predictors of the LVEF. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that LPs (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02–3.05; p = .004) and NSVT (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.18–5.04; p = .001) were independent predictors of the mildly reduced LVEF: 40%–49% versus the preserved LVEF: ≥50%. Conclusion Late potentials and NSVT are independently related to reduced LVEF while they are independent predictors of mildly reduced LVEF versus the preserved LVEF. These findings may have important implications for the arrhythmic risk stratification of post‐MI patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos P Tsimos
- First Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Petros Arsenos
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Arsenos Heart & Biosignals Lab, Avlonas, Greece
| | - Ioannis Doundoulakis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tsiachris
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Skevos Sideris
- State Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Polychronis Dilaveris
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Stergios Soulaidopoulos
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanuel Kanoupakis
- Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Heraklion University Hospital, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- Third Department of Cardiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Antonios Sideris
- Second State Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos Athens General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Efstathios Iliodromitis
- Second Cardiology Department, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tousoulis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Tsioufis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Theofilos M Kolettis
- First Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Konstantinos A Gatzoulis
- First Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Paragomi P, Hinton A, Pothoulakis I, Talukdar R, Kochhar R, Goenka MK, Gulla A, Gonzalez JA, Singh VK, Bogado MF, Stevens T, Barbu ST, Nawaz H, Gutierrez SC, Zarnescu N, Archibugi L, Easler JJ, Triantafyllou K, Peláez-Luna M, Thakkar S, Ocampo C, de-Madaria E, Cote GA, Lee PJ, Krishna S, Lara LF, Han S, Wu BU, Papachristou GI. The Modified Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System Shows Distinct Trajectories in Acute Pancreatitis: An International Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1334-1342.e4. [PMID: 34543736 PMCID: PMC9060638 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The aims of this study were to: (1) assess the performance of the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System (PASS) in a large intercontinental cohort of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP); and (2) investigate whether a modified PASS (mPASS) yields a similar predictive accuracy and produces distinct early trajectories between severity subgroups. METHODS Data was prospectively collected through the Acute Pancreatitis Patient Registry to Examine Novel Therapies In Clinical Experience (APPRENTICE) consortium (2015-2018) involving 22 centers from 4 continents. AP severity was categorized per the revised Atlanta classification. PASS trajectories were compared between the three severity groups using the generalized estimating equations model. Four mPASS models were generated by modifying the morphine equivalent dose (MED), and their trajectories were compared. RESULTS A total of 1393 subjects were enrolled (median age, 49 years; 51% males). The study cohort included 950 mild (68.2%), 315 (22.6%) moderately severe, and 128 (9.2%) severe AP. Mild cases had the lowest PASS at each study time point (all P < .001). A subset of patients with outlier admission PASS values was identified. In the outlier group, 70% of the PASS variation was attributed to the MED, and 66% of these patients were from the United States centers. Among the 4 modified models, the mPASS-1 (excluding MED from PASS) demonstrated high performance in predicting severe AP with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (vs area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.83 in conventional PASS) and produced distinct trajectories with distinct slopes between severity subgroups (all P < .001). CONCLUSION We propose a modified model by removing the MED component, which is easier to calculate, predicts accurately severe AP, and maintains significantly distinct early trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedram Paragomi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;,University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alice Hinton
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ioannis Pothoulakis
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;,MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Aiste Gulla
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania;,Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC
| | | | - Vikesh K. Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, John Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MA
| | | | | | - Sorin T. Barbu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu,” Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Haq Nawaz
- Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, Maine
| | | | | | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy;,Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Mario Peláez-Luna
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán-Universidad Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Shyam Thakkar
- Division of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Carlos Ocampo
- Hospital General de Argudos “Dr. Cosme Argerich,” Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Enrique de-Madaria
- Gastroenterology Department, Alicante University General Hospital, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Gregory A. Cote
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Peter J. Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Somashekar Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Luis F. Lara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Georgios I. Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1067-1077.e15. [PMID: 35124072 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS A systematic literature review (Medline and Cochrane Database) was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy of newer FNB needles in adults undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sample adequacy, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and adverse event rate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses and appraised the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS Overall, 16 RCTs (1934 patients) were identified. On network meta-analysis, Franseen needles (Acquire; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) significantly outperformed reverse-bevel needles (risk ratio [RR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-1.40] for accuracy and 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22] for adequacy) and FNA needles (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25] for accuracy and 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13] for adequacy). Likewise, the Fork-tip needle (SharkCore; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was significantly superior to the reverse-bevel needle (RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33] for accuracy and 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16] for adequacy) and to the FNA needle (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19] for accuracy and 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07] for adequacy). Other comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. As a consequence, Franseen (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .89 for accuracy and .94 for adequacy) and Fork-tip needles (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .76 for accuracy and .73 for adequacy) ranked as the 2 highest-performing FNB needles. When considering different needle sizes, 25-gauge Franseen and 25-gauge Fork-tip needles were not superior to 22-gauge reverse-bevel needles (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, .96-1.46] and 1.04 [95% CI, .62-1.52]). None of the tested needles was significantly superior to the other FNB devices or to FNA needles when rapid onsite cytologic evaluation was available. CONCLUSIONS Franseen and Fork-tip needles, particularly 22-gauge size, showed the highest performance for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses, with low confidence in estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tsamakis K, Galinaki S, Alevyzakis E, Hortis I, Tsiptsios D, Kollintza E, Kympouropoulos S, Triantafyllou K, Smyrnis N, Rizos E. Gut Microbiome: A Brief Review on Its Role in Schizophrenia and First Episode of Psychosis. Microorganisms 2022; 10:microorganisms10061121. [PMID: 35744639 PMCID: PMC9227193 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the role of gut microbiota as a biological basis of psychiatric disorders. The existing literature suggest that cognitive and emotional activities can be influenced by microbes through the microbiota–gut–brain axis and implies an association between alterations in the gut microbiome and several psychiatric conditions, such as autism, depression, bipolar disorder and psychosis. The aim of this review is to summarise recent findings and provide concise updates on the latest progress of the role of gut microbiota in the development and maintenance of psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia and the first episode of psychosis. Despite the lack of consistent findings in regard to specific microbiome changes related to psychosis, the emerging literature reports significant differences in the gut microbiome of schizophrenic subjects compared to healthy controls and increasingly outlines the significance of an altered microbiome composition in the pathogenesis, development, symptom severity and prognosis of psychosis. Further human studies are, however, required, which should focus on identifying the drivers of microbiota changes in psychosis and establish the direction of causality between psychosis and microbiome alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Tsamakis
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK
- Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George’s, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Sofia Galinaki
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Evangelos Alevyzakis
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Ioannis Hortis
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Dimitrios Tsiptsios
- Neurology Department, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece;
| | - Evangelia Kollintza
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Stylianos Kympouropoulos
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Nikolaos Smyrnis
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| | - Emmanouil Rizos
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (S.G.); (E.A.); (I.H.); (E.K.); (S.K.); (N.S.); (E.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rizos E, Pyleris E, Pimentel M, Triantafyllou K, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth Can Form an Indigenous Proinflammatory Environment in the Duodenum: A Prospective Study. Microorganisms 2022; 10:microorganisms10050960. [PMID: 35630404 PMCID: PMC9145321 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10050960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) contributes to the formation of an inflammatory environment in various intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. Cytokines that participate in these mechanisms are yet to be examined. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with duodenal aspiration was performed in 224 patients. Quantitative cultures of aerobic species were performed, concentrations of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were measured, and loads of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Methanobevibacter smithii, and Aeromonas spp. were detected via real-time PCR in the duodenal fluid. Analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) for elevated IL-1β levels was 2.61 (1.06–6.43, p = 0.037) among patients with SIBO compared to patients without SIBO, while there was no significant difference at elevated IL-6 and TNF-α levels between patients with and without SIBO, using ≥10³ cfu/mL as a cut-off. The presence of all three elevated cytokine levels has OR 3.47 (1.06–11.34, p = 0.030) among patients with SIBO. Klebsiella pneumoniae detection was positively related with IL-6 and TNF-α levels, when Methanobevibacter smithii was positively related with IL-1β levels. The presence of SIBO is associated with elevated IL-1β levels in the duodenal fluid. There is a high prevalence of all three proinflammatory cytokine levels elevated (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in the duodenal fluid among patients with SIBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evripidis Rizos
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Propaedeutic Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece; (E.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Emmanouel Pyleris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleion General Hospital, 151 26 Athens, Greece;
| | - Mark Pimentel
- Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Propaedeutic Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece; (E.R.); (K.T.)
| | - Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Street, 124 62 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-210-583-1994
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kasti AN, Nikolaki MD, Synodinou KD, Katsas KN, Petsis K, Lambrinou S, Pyrousis IA, Triantafyllou K. The Effects of Stevia Consumption on Gut Bacteria: Friend or Foe? Microorganisms 2022; 10:microorganisms10040744. [PMID: 35456796 PMCID: PMC9028423 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Stevia, a zero-calorie sugar substitute, is recognized as safe by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In vitro and in vivo studies showed that stevia has antiglycemic action and antioxidant effects in adipose tissue and the vascular wall, reduces blood pressure levels and hepatic steatosis, stabilizes the atherosclerotic plaque, and ameliorates liver and kidney damage. The metabolism of steviol glycosides is dependent upon gut microbiota, which breaks down glycosides into steviol that can be absorbed by the host. In this review, we elucidated the effects of stevia’s consumption on the host’s gut microbiota. Due to the lack of randomized clinical trials in humans, we included in vitro using certain microbial strains and in vivo in laboratory animal studies. Results indicated that stevia consumption has a potential benefit on the microbiome’s alpha diversity. Alterations in the colonic microenvironment may depend on the amount and frequency of stevia intake, as well as on the simultaneous consumption of other dietary components. The anti-inflammatory properties of stevioside were confirmed in vitro by decreasing TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 synthesis and inhibiting of NF-κB transcription factor, and in vivo by inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK in laboratory animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezina N. Kasti
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
| | - Maroulla D. Nikolaki
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
| | - Kalliopi D. Synodinou
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
| | - Konstantinos N. Katsas
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
- Institute of Preventive Medicine Environmental and Occupational Health Prolepsis, 15125 Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Petsis
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
| | - Sophia Lambrinou
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
| | - Ioannis A. Pyrousis
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (A.N.K.); (M.D.N.); (K.D.S.); (K.N.K.); (K.P.); (S.L.); (I.A.P.)
- Medical School, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-2105832090
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tachmatzidis D, Tsarouchas A, Mouselimis D, Filos D, Antoniadis AP, Lysitsas DN, Mezilis N, Sakellaropoulou A, Giannopoulos G, Bakogiannis C, Triantafyllou K, Fragakis N, Letsas KP, Asvestas D, Efremidis M, Lazaridis C, Chouvarda I, Vassilikos VP. P-Wave Beat-to-Beat Analysis to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040830. [PMID: 35453877 PMCID: PMC9028701 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The identification of patients prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) relapse after catheter ablation is essential for better patient selection and risk stratification. The current prospective cohort study aims to validate a novel P-wave index based on beat-to-beat (B2B) P-wave morphological and wavelet analysis designed to detect patients with low burden AF as a predictor of AF recurrence within a year after successful catheter ablation. From a total of 138 consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation, 12-lead ECG and 10 min vectorcardiogram (VCG) recordings were obtained. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with higher B2B P-wave index had a two-fold risk for AF recurrence (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.24–4.44, p: 0.010), along with prolonged P-wave, interatrial block, early AF recurrence, female gender, heart failure history, previous stroke, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Multivariate analysis of assessable predictors before ablation revealed that B2B P-wave index, along with heart failure history and a history of previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, are independent predicting factors of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Further studies are needed to assess the predictive value of the B2B index with greater accuracy and evaluate a possible relationship with atrial substrate analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Tachmatzidis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Anastasios Tsarouchas
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Dimitrios Mouselimis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Dimitrios Filos
- Lab of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Antonios P. Antoniadis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | | | - Nikolaos Mezilis
- St. Luke’s Hospital Thessaloniki, 552 36 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.N.L.); (N.M.)
| | - Antigoni Sakellaropoulou
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, 2nd Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital of Athens, 106 76 Athens, Greece; (A.S.); (K.P.L.); (D.A.); (M.E.)
| | - Georgios Giannopoulos
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Constantinos Bakogiannis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Konstantinos P. Letsas
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, 2nd Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital of Athens, 106 76 Athens, Greece; (A.S.); (K.P.L.); (D.A.); (M.E.)
| | - Dimitrios Asvestas
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, 2nd Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital of Athens, 106 76 Athens, Greece; (A.S.); (K.P.L.); (D.A.); (M.E.)
| | - Michael Efremidis
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, 2nd Department of Cardiology, Evangelismos General Hospital of Athens, 106 76 Athens, Greece; (A.S.); (K.P.L.); (D.A.); (M.E.)
| | - Charalampos Lazaridis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| | - Ioanna Chouvarda
- Lab of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Vassilios P. Vassilikos
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.T.); (D.M.); (A.P.A.); (G.G.); (C.B.); (K.T.); (N.F.); (C.L.); (V.P.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Panagiotopoulos I, Kotsopoulos N, Verras GI, Mulita F, Katinioti A, Koletsis E, Triantafyllou K, Yfantopoulos J. Perceval S, sutureless aortic valve: cost-consequence analysis. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2022; 19:22-27. [PMID: 35414814 PMCID: PMC8981134 DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2022.114551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have the potential of shortening ischemic time. AIM We conducted the present study to assess the clinical and economic impact of the biological, sutureless, self-expanding Perceval S valve since the effect of shortened operative times on hospital costs remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis. From January 2018 to January 2019, 29 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with the Crown PRT bioprosthetic Aortic Valve, whereas 35 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with Perceval S (auto-expanded, sutureless, bioprosthesis). Preoperative data, hospital outcome, and health care resource consumption were compared, using χ2 and t-test. RESULTS Aortic cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary bypass, and operation times were significantly shorter in the Perceval S group (p < 0.001). Patients in the sutureless group required blood transfusion less frequently (p = 0.03) and had a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p = 0.01). Hospital stay (p = 0.57) and pacemaker implantation were similar between groups. The reduction of aortic cross-clamp, extracorporeal circulation times, and ICU stay resulted in reduced resource consumption in the sutureless group. CONCLUSIONS The use of the Perceval S valve is clinically safe and effective. A shorter procedural time in the sutureless group is associated with better clinical outcomes and reduced hospital costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Panagiotopoulos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, General University, Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Kotsopoulos
- Division of Health Economics, Global Market Access Solutions, St-Prex, Switzerland
| | | | - Francesk Mulita
- Department of Surgery, General University, Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Anastasia Katinioti
- Cardiology Unit, Hippokration Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Efstratios Koletsis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, General University, Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - John Yfantopoulos
- MBA – Health Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Triantafyllou K, Karkos CD, Fragakis N, Antoniadis AP, Meletidou M, Vassilikos V. Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided vascular access in cardiac electrophysiology procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2022; 22:145-153. [PMID: 35143989 PMCID: PMC9091764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|