1
|
Dahiya DS, Facciorusso A, Chandan S, Sohail AH, Gangwani MK, Franchellucci G, Mangiavillano B. Understanding evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2024; 13:352-355. [PMID: 38617501 PMCID: PMC11007351 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, Foggia University Hospital, Foggia, FG, Italy
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Complex Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Manesh Kumar Gangwani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Gianluca Franchellucci
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mangiavillano B, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo FM, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, De Luca L, Di Leo M, Conti Bellocchi MC, Spadaccini M, Dabizzi E, Auriemma F, Stigliano S, Ramai D, Calabrese F, Manfrin E, Paduano D, Hassan C, Repici A, Crinó SF. Establishing the optimal number of passes during EUS-FNB for diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E467-E473. [PMID: 38585018 PMCID: PMC10997423 DOI: 10.1055/a-2236-7654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The optimal number of needle passes during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is not yet established. We aimed to perform a per-pass analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic lesions using a 22G Franseen needle. Patients and methods Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions referred to 11 Italian centers were prospectively enrolled. Three needle passes were performed; specimens were collected after each pass and processed individually as standard histology following macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) by the endoscopist. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy of each sequential pass. Final diagnosis was established based on surgical pathology or a clinical course of at least 6 months. Secondary endpoints were specimen adequacy, MOSE reliability, factors impacting diagnostic accuracy, and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 504 samples from 168 patients were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% (85.0%-94.1%) after one pass and 97.6% (94.1%-99.3%) after two passes ( P =0.01). Similarly, diagnostic sensitivity and sample adequacy were significantly higher adding the second needle pass (90.2%, 84.6%-94.3% vs 97.5%, 93.8%-99.3%, P =0.009 and 91.1%, 85.7%-94.9% vs 98.2%, 95.8%-99.3%, P =0.009, one pass vs two passes, respectively). Accuracy, sensitivity, and adequacy remained the same after the third pass. The concordance between MOSE and histological evaluation was 89.9%. The number of passes was the only factor associated with accuracy. One case of mild acute pancreatitis (0.6%) was managed conservatively. Conclusions At least two passes should be performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. MOSE is a reliable tool to predict the histological adequacy of specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Casa di Cura Privata SpA, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | | | - Carmelo Barbera
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino-Estense, Baggiovara di Modena (Mo), Italy
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | - Luca De Luca
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Dabizzi
- Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense di Baggiovara, Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
- Gastroenterologia, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Serena Stigliano
- Operative Endoscopy Department, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Casa di Cura Privata SpA, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona Hospital Trust P.Le L.A. Scuro 10, Verona, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinó
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mangiavillano B, Lakhtakia S, Samanta J, Auriemma F, Vargas-Madrigal J, Arcidiacono PG, Barbera C, Ashhab H, Song TJ, Pham KDK, Teoh AYB, Moon JH, Crinò SF, Kongkam P, Aragona G, De Lusong MA, Dhar J, Ofosu A, Ventra A, Paduano D, Franchellucci G, Repici A, Larghi A, Facciorusso A. Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study. Endoscopy 2024; 56:249-257. [PMID: 38237633 DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-3179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) using the Hot-Axios device has recently been associated with a significant risk of bleeding. This adverse event (AE) seems to occur less frequently with the use of a different device, the Spaxus stent. The aim of the current study was to compare the rates of bleeding between the two stents. METHODS Patients admitted for treatment of PFCs by EUS plus lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 endoscopy referral centers between 10 July 2019 and 28 February 2022 were identified and their outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. RESULTS 363 patients were evaluated. After a 1-to-1 propensity score match, 264 patients were selected (132 per group). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred in the Hot-Axios group than in the Spaxus group (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.03); stent type was a significant predictor of bleeding in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Bleeding necessitating arterial embolization did not however differ significantly between the two groups (3.0% vs. 0%; P = 0.12). In addition, the Hot-Axios was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall AEs compared with the Spaxus stent (9.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION Our study showed that, in patients with PFCs, bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred significantly more frequently with use of the Hot-Axios stent than with the Spaxus stent, although this was not the case for bleeding requiring embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jayanta Samanta
- Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Jorge Vargas-Madrigal
- Gastroenterology Department, Enrique Baltodano Briceno Hospital, Liberia, Costa Rica
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Istituto Scientifico Universitario San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Carmelo Barbera
- Gastroenterology Unit, Civil Hospital Giuseppe Mazzini, Teramo, Italy
| | - Hazem Ashhab
- Gastroenterology, Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine, State of
| | - Tae Jun Song
- Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Khanh Do-Kong Pham
- Bergen Research group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (BRAGE), Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anthony Y B Teoh
- Division of Upper Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Internal Medicine, Soon Chung Hyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
| | | | - Pradermchai Kongkam
- Division of Hospital and Ambulatory Medicine, and Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Giovanni Aragona
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Mark A De Lusong
- Interventional Endoscopy, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
| | - Agostino Ventra
- Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliera Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology, University of Foggia Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mangiavillano B, Moon JH, Facciorusso A, Vargas-Madrigal J, Di Matteo F, Rizzatti G, De Luca L, Forti E, Mutignani M, Al-Lehibi A, Paduano D, Bulajic M, Decembrino F, Auriemma F, Franchellucci G, De Marco A, Gentile C, Shin IS, Rea R, Massidda M, Calabrese F, Mirante VG, Ofosu A, Crinò SF, Hassan C, Repici A, Larghi A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a first approach for jaundice palliation in unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: Prospective study. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:351-358. [PMID: 37253185 DOI: 10.1111/den.14606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents the gold standard for jaundice palliation in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). Biliary drainage using electrocautery lumen apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS) is currently a well-established procedure when ERCP fails. In a palliative setting the endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) could represent an easy and valid option. We performed a prospective study with a new EC-LAMS with the primary aim to assess the clinical success rate of EUS-GBD as a first-line approach to the palliation of DMBO. METHODS In all, 37 consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD with a new EC-LAMS were prospectively enrolled. Clinical success was defined as bilirubin level decrease >15% within 24 h and >50% within 14 days after EC-LAMS placement. RESULTS The mean age was 73.5 ± 10.8 years; there were 17 male patients (45.9%). EC-LAMS placement was technically feasible in all patients (100%) and the clinical success rate was 100%. Four patients (10.8%) experienced adverse events, one bleeding, one food impaction, and two cystic duct obstructions because of disease progression. No stent-related deaths were observed. The mean hospitalization was 7.7 ± 3.4 days. Median overall survival was 4 months (95% confidence interval 1-8). CONCLUSION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with the new EC-LAMS is a valid option in palliative endoscopic biliary drainage as a first-step approach in low survival patients with malignant jaundice unfit for surgery. A smaller diameter EC-LAMS should be preferred, particularly if the drainage is performed through the stomach, to avoid potential food impaction, which could result in stent dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Varese, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, South Korea
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Jorge Vargas-Madrigal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hospital Enrique Baltodano Briceño, Liberia, Costa Rica
| | | | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca De Luca
- Endoscopic Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mutignani
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Abed Al-Lehibi
- King Fahad Medical City, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Varese, Italy
| | - Milutin Bulajic
- Digestive Endoscopy, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Decembrino
- UOC Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ente Ecclesiastico-Ospedale Generale Regionale "F.Miulli", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Franchellucci
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Varese, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Varese, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Gentile
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Varese, Italy
| | - Il Sang Shin
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, South Korea
| | - Roberta Rea
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Giorgio Mirante
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Binda C, Anderloni A, Forti E, Fusaroli P, Macchiarelli R, Manno M, Fugazza A, Redaelli A, Aragona G, Lovera M, Togliani T, Armellini E, Amato A, Brancaccio ML, Badas R, Leone N, de Nucci G, Mangiavillano B, Sbrancia M, Pollino V, Lisotti A, Maida M, Sinagra E, Ventimiglia M, Repici A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Acute Cholecystitis: Results of a Nationwide Study with Long-Term Follow-Up. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:413. [PMID: 38396453 PMCID: PMC10887962 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has become one of the treatments of choice for acute cholecystitis (AC) in fragile patients, scant data are available on real-life settings and long-term outcomes. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective study including EUS-guided GBD using LAMS for AC in 19 Italian centers from June 2014 to July 2020. The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success, and the secondary outcomes were the rate of adverse events (AE) and long-term follow-up. RESULTS In total, 116 patients (48.3% female) were included, with a mean age of 82.7 ± 11 years. LAMS were placed, transgastric in 44.8% of cases, transduodenal in 53.3% and transjejunal in 1.7%, in patients with altered anatomy. Technical success was achieved in 94% and clinical success in 87.1% of cases. The mean follow-up was 309 days. AEs occurred in 12/116 pts (10.3%); 8/12 were intraprocedural, while 1 was classified as early (<15 days) and 3 as delayed (>15 days). According to the ASGE lexicon, two (16.7%) were mild, three (25%) were moderate, and seven (58.3%) were severe. No fatal AEs occurred. In subgroup analysis of 40 patients with a follow-up longer than one year, no recurrence of AC was observed. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GBD had high technical and clinical success rates, despite the non-negligible rate of AEs, thus representing an effective treatment option for fragile patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S., Policlinico San Matteo Viale, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Ca’ Granda Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Imola, Italy; (P.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Raffaele Macchiarelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, A.O.U.S. Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
| | - Mauro Manno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (A.R.)
| | | | - Giovanni Aragona
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy;
| | - Mauro Lovera
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, 25133 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital Borgo Trento, 37126 Verona, Italy;
| | - Elia Armellini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, 24060 Seriate, Italy;
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, 22100 Como, Italy;
| | | | - Roberta Badas
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, 09123 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Nicola Leone
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo, 10153 Turin, Italy;
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, 20024 Garbagnate Milanese, Italy;
| | | | - Monica Sbrancia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Valeria Pollino
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Michele Hospital, 09126 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Imola, Italy; (P.F.); (A.L.)
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna ‘Kore’, 94100 Enna, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Contrada Pietrapollastra Pisciotto, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
| | - Marco Ventimiglia
- Directorate General of Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Service, Italian Ministry of Health, 00153 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì-Cesena, Italy; (M.S.); (C.F.)
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fugazza A, Khalaf K, Pawlak KM, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Andreozzi M, Giacchetto M, Carrara S, Ferrari C, Binda C, Mangiavillano B, Anderloni A, Repici A. Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue approach in cases of unsuccessful biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:70-78. [PMID: 38293324 PMCID: PMC10823897 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i1.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management. EUS-GBD is a minimally invasive and effective technique for drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis with high risk of surgery. The procedure has demonstrated impressive technical and clinical success rates with low rates of adverse events, making it a safe and effective option for appropriate candidates. Furthermore, EUS-GBD can also serve as a rescue option for patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS biliary drainage for relief of jaundice in malignant biliary stricture. However, patient selection is critical for the success of EUS-GBD, and proper patient selection and risk assessment are important to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure. As the field continues to evolve and mature, ongoing research will further refine our understanding of the benefits and limitations of EUS-GBD, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto M5B 1W8, ON, Canada
| | - Katarzyna M Pawlak
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto M5B 1W8, ON, Canada
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Andreozzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Giacchetto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Ferrari
- Department of Anesthesia, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Romagna 47121, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Fugazza A, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Ramai D, Mangiavillano B, Chandan S, Gkolfakis P, Mohan B, Hassan C, Repici A. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 56:31-40. [PMID: 37591258 DOI: 10.1055/a-2156-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on the comparative diagnostic performance of endoscopic tissue sampling techniques for subepithelial lesions. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare these techniques. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of bite-on-bite biopsy, mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB), endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB). Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95%CI. RESULTS Eight RCTs were identified. EUS-FNB was significantly superior to EUS-FNA in terms of sample adequacy (RR 1.20 [95%CI 1.05-1.45]), whereas none of the other techniques significantly outperformed EUS-FNA. Additionally, bite-on-bite biopsy was significantly inferior to EUS-FNB (RR 0.55 [95%CI 0.33-0.98]). Overall, EUS-FNB appeared to be the best technique (surface under cumulative ranking [SUCRA] score 0.90) followed by MIAB (SUCRA 0.83), whereas bite-on-bite biopsy showed the poorest performance. When considering lesions <20 mm, MIAB, but not EUS-FNB, showed significantly higher accuracy rates compared with EUS-FNA (RR 1.68 [95%CI 1.02-2.88]). Overall, MIAB ranked as the best intervention for lesions <20 mm (SUCRA score 0.86 for adequacy and 0.91 for accuracy), with EUS-FNB only slightly superior to EUS-FNA. When rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) was available, no difference between EUS-FNB, EUS-FNA, and MIAB was observed. CONCLUSION EUS-FNB and MIAB appeared to provide better performance, whereas bite-on-bite sampling was significantly inferior to the other techniques. MIAB seemed to be the best option for smaller lesions, whereas EUS-FNA remained competitive when ROSE was available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States
| | | | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, United States
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopouleion-Patision" General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - Babu Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, United States
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mangiavillano B, Brandaleone L, Auriemma F, Calabrese F, Paduano D, Gentile CS, Repici A. One-step endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of pancreatic mass, gastroenterostomy, and gallbladder drainage for malignant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction. Endoscopy 2023; 55:E936-E937. [PMID: 37527785 PMCID: PMC10411086 DOI: 10.1055/a-2127-4436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Brandaleone
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Carmine S. Gentile
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Binda C, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Amato A, de Nucci G, Redaelli A, Di Mitri R, Cugia L, Pollino V, Macchiarelli R, Mangiavillano B, Forti E, Brancaccio ML, Badas R, Maida M, Sinagra E, Repici A, Fabbri C, Tarantino I. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage using a lumen-apposing metal stent as rescue treatment for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a large multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:765-773. [PMID: 37392954 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has been reported as a rescue treatment with encouraging results for the relief of jaundice in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) and after failure of both ERCP and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of all cases of consecutive EUS-GBD with LAMSs used as a rescue treatment for patients with DMBO in 14 Italian centers from June 2015 to June 2020. Primary endpoints were technical and clinical success, whereas the secondary endpoint was the adverse event (AE) rate. RESULTS Forty-eight patients (52.1% women) with a mean age of 74.3 ± 11.7 years were included in the study. Biliary stricture was related to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (85.4%), duodenal adenocarcinoma (2.1%), cholangiocarcinoma (4.2%), ampullary cancer (2.1%), colon cancer (4.2%), and metastatic breast cancer (2.1%). The mean diameter of the common bile duct was 13.3 ± 2.8 mm. LAMSs were placed transgastrically in 58.3% of cases and transduodenally in 41.7%. Technical success was 100%, whereas clinical success was 81.3%, with a mean total bilirubin reduction after 2 weeks of 66.5%. The mean procedure time was 26.4 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 9.2 ± 8.2 days. AEs occurred in 5 patients (10.4%): 3 were classified as intraprocedural and 2 were classified as delayed because they occurred after >15 days. When the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon was used, 2 AEs were mild and 3 were moderate (2 buried LAMSs). The mean follow-up was 122 days. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that EUS-GBD with LAMSs used as a rescue treatment for patients affected by DMBO represents a valuable option in terms of technical and clinical success rates, with an acceptable AE rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study concerning the use of this procedure. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03903523.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy.
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Luigi Cugia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Emergency, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Valeria Pollino
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, S. Michele Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | | | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Ca' Granda Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Badas
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brandaleone L, Franchellucci G, Facciorusso A, Samanta J, Moon JH, Vargas-Madrigal J, Robles Medranda C, Barbera C, Di Matteo F, Bulajic M, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Calabrese F, Gentile C, Massidda M, Bianchi M, De Luca L, Polverini D, Masoni B, Poletti V, Marcozzi G, Hassan C, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. The Use of a New Dedicated Electrocautery Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent for Gallbladder Drainage in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3341. [PMID: 37958236 PMCID: PMC10650170 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) in ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) have become increasingly important for high-risk surgical patients. Our study aims to evaluate the technical and clinical success, safety, and feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage using a new dedicated LAMS. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study that included all consecutive patients not suitable for surgery who were referred to a tertiary center for EUS-GBD using a new dedicated electrocautery LAMS for acute cholecystitis at eight different centers. Results: Our study included 54 patients with a mean age of 76.48 years (standard deviation: 12.6 years). Out of the 54 endoscopic gallbladder drainages performed, 24 (44.4%) were cholecysto-gastrostomy, and 30 (55.4%) were cholecysto-duodenostomy. The technical success of LAMS placement was 100%, and clinical success was achieved in 23 out of 30 patients (76.67%). Adverse events were observed in two patients (5.6%). Patients were discharged after a median of 5 days post-stenting. Conclusions: EUS-GBD represents a valuable option for high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. This new dedicated LAMS has demonstrated a high rate of technical and clinical success, along with a high level of safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Brandaleone
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franchellucci
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, Foggia University Hospital, 71122 Foggia, Puglia, Italy;
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Gastroenterology PGIMER, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India;
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon 31538, Republic of Korea;
| | - Jorge Vargas-Madrigal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hospital Enrique Baltodano Briceño, Liberia 50101, Costa Rica;
| | - Carlos Robles Medranda
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas—IECED, Gastroenterology Av Abel Romero Castillo, Guayaquil 090505, Guayas, Ecuador;
| | - Carmelo Barbera
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Di Matteo
- GIUnit, Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University, 00128 Rome, Rome, Italy;
| | - Milutin Bulajic
- Digestive Endoscopy, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, 00186 Rome, Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit—Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Varese, Italy; (F.A.); (D.P.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit—Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Varese, Italy; (F.A.); (D.P.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit—Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Varese, Italy; (F.A.); (D.P.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Carmine Gentile
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit—Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Varese, Italy; (F.A.); (D.P.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| | - Marco Massidda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, 07026 Olbia, Sassari, Italy;
| | - Marco Bianchi
- Policlinico Casilino Hospital, 00169 Rome, Rome, Italy;
| | - Luca De Luca
- Endoscopic Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Milan, Italy;
| | - Davide Polverini
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Masoni
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Poletti
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Marcozzi
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy; (D.P.); (B.M.); (V.P.); (G.M.); (C.H.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit—Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Varese, Italy; (F.A.); (D.P.); (F.C.); (C.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carrara S, Rahal D, Khalaf K, Rizkala T, Koleth G, Bonifacio C, Andreozzi M, Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Bossi P, Balzarotti M, Facciorusso A, Staiano T, Maldi E, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Fugazza A, Maselli R, Hassan C, Repici A. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of EUS-guided end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for tissue sampling of abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a prospective multicenter series. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:191-198. [PMID: 36990125 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The role of the newer EUS fine-needle biopsy needles in lymphadenopathies (LAs) is still under evaluation. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and adverse event rate of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in diagnosing LAs. METHODS From June 2015 to June 2022, all patients referred to 4 institutions for EUS-FNB of mediastinal and abdominal LAs were enrolled. Twenty-two-gauge Franseen tip or 25-gauge fork-tip needles were used. The criterion standard for positive results was surgery or imaging and clinical evolution over a follow-up of at least 1 year. RESULTS One hundred consecutive patients were enrolled, consisting of those with a new diagnosis of LA (40%), presence of LA with a previous history of neoplasia (51%), or suspected lymphoproliferative disease (9%). EUS-FNB was technically feasible in all LA patients with 2 to 3 passes (mean, 2.62 ± .93). The overall sensitivity, positive predictive value, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy for EUS-FNB were 96.20%, 100%, 100%, 87.50%, and 97.00%, respectively. Histologic analysis was feasible in 89% of cases. Cytologic evaluation was performed in 67% of specimens. A statistical difference between the accuracy of the 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle (P = .63) was not found. A subanalysis on lymphoproliferative disease revealed a sensitivity and accuracy of 89.29% and 90.0%, respectively. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNB with new end-cutting needles is a valuable and safe method to diagnose LAs. The high quality of histologic cores and the good amount of tissue allowed a complete immunohistochemical analysis of metastatic LAs and precise subtyping of the lymphomas. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02855151.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Research Center- IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommy Rizkala
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Glenn Koleth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy
| | | | | | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Paola Bossi
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Research Center- IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Balzarotti
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Maldi
- Pathology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberta Maselli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Samanta J, Nabi Z, Facciorusso A, Dhar J, Akbar W, Das A, Birda CL, Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Crino SF, Kochhar R, Lakhtakia S, Reddy DN. EUS-guided coil and glue injection versus endoscopic glue injection for gastric varices: International multicentre propensity-matched analysis. Liver Int 2023; 43:1783-1792. [PMID: 37269164 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric varices (GVs) are conventionally managed with endoscopic cyanoacrylate (E-CYA) glue injection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapy using combination of coils and CYA glue (EUS-CG) is a relatively recent modality. There is limited data comparing the two techniques. METHODOLOGY This international multicentre study included patients with GV undergoing endotherapy from two Indian and two Italian tertiary care centres. Patients undergoing EUS-CG were compared with propensity-matched E-CYA cases from a cohort of 218 patients. Procedural details such as amount of glue, number of coils used, number of sessions required for obliteration, bleeding after index procedure rates and need for re-intervention were noted. RESULTS Of 276 patients, 58 (male 42, 72.4%; mean age-44.3 ± 12.1 years) underwent EUS-CG and were compared with 118 propensity-matched cases of E-CYA. In the EUS-CG arm, complete obliteration at 4 weeks was noted in 54 (93.1%) cases. Compared to the E-CYA cohort, EUS-CG arm showed significantly lower number of session (1.0 vs. 1.5; p < 0.0001) requirement, lower subsequent-bleeding episodes (13.8% vs. 39.1%; p < 0.0001) and lower re-intervention (12.1% vs. 50.4%; p < 0.001) rates. On multivariable regression analysis, size of the varix (aOR-1.17; CI 1.08-1.26) and technique of therapy (aOR-14.71; CI 4.32-50.0) were significant predictors of re-bleeding. A maximum GV size >17.5 mm had a 69% predictive accuracy for need for re-intervention. CONCLUSION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy of GV using coil and CYA glue is a safe technique with better efficacy and lower re-bleeding rates on follow-up compared to the conventional endoscopic CYA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Zaheer Nabi
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Wahid Akbar
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Chhagan Lal Birda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | - Rakesh Kochhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Calabrese F, Poletti V, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Gentile C, Facciorusso A, Franchellucci G, De Marco A, Brandaleone L, Ofosu A, Samanta J, Ramai D, De Luca L, Al-Lehibi A, Zuliani W, Hassan C, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. New Perspectives in Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2057. [PMID: 37370952 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease has a high incidence and prevalence in the general population. Clinical manifestations are heterogenous, and so is the response to medical treatment. Proton pump inhibitors are still the most common agents used to control reflux symptoms and for healing esophagitis, but they are not a one-size-fits-all solution for the disease. Patients with persistent troublesome symptoms despite medical therapy, those experiencing some adverse drug reaction, or those unwilling to take lifelong medications deserve valid alternatives. Anti-reflux Nissen fundoplication is an effective option, but the risk of adverse events has limited its spread. In recent years, advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have been made, and three major endoluminal alternatives are now available, including (1) the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the esophago-gastric junction, (2) transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and (3) anti-reflux mucosal interventions (ARMI) based on mucosal resection (ARMS) and mucosal ablation (ARMA) techniques to remodel the cardia. Endoscopic techniques have shown interesting results, but their diffusion is still limited to expert endoscopists in tertiary centers. This review discusses the state of the art in the endoscopic approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Valeria Poletti
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Carmine Gentile
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro De Marco
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Brandaleone
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Luca De Luca
- Endoscopic Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Abed Al-Lehibi
- King Fahad Medical City, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abduaziz University-Health Science, Riyadh 11525, Saudi Arabia
| | - Walter Zuliani
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Manthopoulou E, Ramai D, Ioannou A, Gkolfakis P, Papanikolaou IS, Mangiavillano B, Triantafyllou K, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition beyond the pancreas. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:257-266. [PMID: 37144012 PMCID: PMC10152811 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers the ability to obtain tissue material via a fine needle under direct visualization for cytological or pathological examination. Prior studies have looked at EUS tissue acquisition; however, most reports have been centered around lesions of the pancreas. This paper aims to review the literature on EUS tissue acquisition in other organs (beyond the pancreas) such as the liver, biliary tree, lymph nodes, and upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts. Furthermore, techniques for obtaining tissue samples under EUS guidance continue to evolve. Specifically, some of the techniques that endoscopists employ are suction techniques (i.e., dry heparin, dry suction technique, wet suction technique), the slow pull technique, and the fanning technique. Apart from acquisition techniques, the type and size of the needle utilized play a major role in the quality of samples. This review describes the indications for tissue acquisition for each organ, and also describes and compares the various tissue acquisition techniques, as well as the different needles used according to their shape and size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Manthopoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Savvas Oncology Hospital of Athens, Greece (Eleni Manthopoulou)
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (Daryl Ramai)
| | - Alexandros Ioannou
- Gastroenterology Department, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Alexandros Ioannou)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium (Paraskevas Gkolfakis)
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘‘Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy (Benedetto Mangiavillano)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘‘Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Triantafyllou)
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy (Stefano Francesco Crinò)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Italy (Antonio Facciorusso)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spadaccini M, Hassan C, Rondonotti E, Antonelli G, Andrisani G, Lollo G, Auriemma F, Iacopini F, Facciorusso A, Maselli R, Fugazza A, Bambina Bergna IM, Cereatti F, Mangiavillano B, Radaelli F, Di Matteo F, Gross SA, Sharma P, Mori Y, Bretthauer M, Rex DK, Repici A. Combination of mucosa-exposure device and computer-aided detection for Adenoma Detection during Colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2023:S0016-5085(23)00595-4. [PMID: 37061169 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Both Computer-aided detection (CADe)- assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy have shown to increase adenoma detection. We investigated the performance of the combination of the two tools compared to CADe-assisted colonoscopy alone to detect colorectal neoplasias during colonoscopy in a multicenter randomized trial. METHODS Men and women undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening, polyp surveillance, or clincial indications at 6 centers in Italy and Switzerland were enrolled. Patients were assigned (1:1) to colonoscopy with the combinations of CADe (GI-Genius, Medtronic) and a mucosal exposure device (Endocuff Vision -ECV-, Olympus) or to CADe-assisted colonoscopy alone (control group). All detected lesions were removed and sent to histopathology for diagnosis. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR, the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy, advanced adenomas and serrated lesions detection rate, the rate of unnecessary polypectomies (polyp resection without histologically proven adenomas), and withdrawal time. RESULTS From July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022, 1316 subjects were randomized and eligible for analysis; 660 to the ECV group, 656 to control group). The ADR was significantly higher in the ECV group (49.6%) than in the control group (44.0%) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.26; p = 0.04). Adenomas detected per colonoscopy were significantly higher in the ECV group (mean, 0.94+0.54) than in the control group (0.74+0.21) (incidence rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.04-1.54; p: 0.02). The two groups did not differ in term of detection of advanced adenomas and serrated lesions. There was no significant difference between groups in withdrawal time (9.01±2.48 seconds for the ECV group vs 8.96 ±2.24 for controls; P = 0.69) or proportion of subjects undergoing unnecessary polypectomies (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.69-1.14. p: 0.38). CONCLUSIONS The combination of CADe and EndocuffVision during colonoscopy increases ADR and adenomas detected per colonoscopy without increasing withdrawal time compared to CADe alone. CLINICALTRIALS gov no: NCT04676308.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Giulio Antonelli
- "Sapienza" University of Rome, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics Sciences, Rome, Italy; Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ariccia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Andrisani
- Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Lollo
- Università della Svizzera Italiana, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Humanitas Mater Domini, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Federico Iacopini
- Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ariccia, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- University of Foggia, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Foggia, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Cereatti
- Ospedale dei Castelli Hospital, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ariccia, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Mater Domini, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Di Matteo
- Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Seth A Gross
- NYU Langone Health, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York, New York
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Kansas City VA Medical Center, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City, United States
| | - Yuichi Mori
- University of Oslo, Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo, Norway; Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Digestive Disease Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center -IRCCS-, Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Spadaccini M, Conti Bellocchi MC, Mangiavillano B, Fantin A, Rahal D, Manfrin E, Gavazzi F, Bozzarelli S, Crinò SF, Terrin M, Di Leo M, Bonifacio C, Facciorusso A, Realdon S, Cristofori C, Auriemma F, Fugazza A, Frulloni L, Hassan C, Repici A, Carrara S. Secondary Tumors of the Pancreas: A Multicenter Analysis of Clinicopathological and Endosonographic Features. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082829. [PMID: 37109171 PMCID: PMC10145689 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Many tumors may secondarily involve the pancreas; however, only retrospective autopic and surgical series are available. We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients with histologically confirmed secondary tumors of the pancreas referred to five Italian centers between 2010 and 2021. We described clinical and pathological features, therapeutic approach and treatment outcomes. EUS characteristics of the lesions and the tissue acquisition procedures (needle, passages, histology) were recorded. A total of 116 patients (males/females 69/47; mean age 66.7) with 236 histologically confirmed pancreatic metastases were included; kidney was the most common primary site. EUS was performed to confirm the diagnosis in 205 lesions which presented as predominantly solitary (59), hypoechoic (95) and hypervascular (60), with a heterogeneous (n = 54) pattern and well-defined borders (n = 52). EUS-guided tissue acquisition was performed in 94 patients with an overall accuracy of 97.9%. Histological evaluation was possible in 88.3% of patients, obtaining final diagnosis in all cases. When cytology alone was performed, the final diagnosis was obtained in 83.3% of cases. A total of 67 patients underwent chemo/radiation therapy, and surgery was attempted in 45 (38.8%) patients. Pancreatic metastases are a possible event in the natural history of solid tumors, even long after the diagnosis of the primary site. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may be suggested to implement the differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alberto Fantin
- Gastroenterology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Gavazzi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Bozzarelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Terrin
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, San Paolo Hospital, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Bonifacio
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Stefano Realdon
- Gastroenterology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Cristofori
- Gastroenterology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mangiavillano B, Larghi A, Vargas-Madrigal J, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Crinò SF, Pham KDC, Moon JH, Auriemma F, Camellini L, Paduano D, Stigliano S, Calabrese F, Ofosu A, Al-Lehibi A, Repici A. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using a novel electrocautery lumen apposing metal stent for treatment of gastric outlet obstruction (with video). Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:644-648. [PMID: 36890050 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been actually performed only with one type of electrocautery lumen-apposing metal stents (EC-LAMS). We aimed to evaluate the safety, technical and clinical effectiveness of EUS-GE using a newly available EC-LAMS in patients with malignant and benign GOO. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-GE for GOO using the new EC-LAMS at five endoscopic referral centers were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical efficacy was determined utilizing the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS). RESULTS Twenty-five patients (64% male, mean age 68.7 ± 9.3 years) met the inclusion criteria; 21 (84%) had malignant etiology. Technically, EUS-GE was successful in all patients, with a mean procedural time of 35 ± 5 min. Clinical success was 68% at 7 days and 100% at 30 days. The mean time to resume oral diet was 11.4 ± 5.8 h, with an improvement of at least one point of GOOSS score observed in all patients. The median hospital stay was 4 days. No procedure-related adverse events occurred. After a mean follow-up of 7.6 months (95% CI 4.6-9.2), no stent dysfunctions were observed. CONCLUSION This study suggests EUS-GE can be performed safely and successfully using the new EC-LAMS. Future large multicenter prospective studies are needed to confirm our preliminary data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Jong Hoo Moon
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | | | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | | | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Abed Al-Lehibi
- King Fahad Medical City- Faculty of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abduaziz University-Health Science, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, Inzani F, Rimbaș M, Lisotti A, Manfredi G, Teoh AYB, Mangiavillano B, Sendino O, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Scimeca D, Unti E, Carlino A, Voiosu T, Mateescu RB, Fusaroli P, Lega S, Buscarini E, Pergola L, Chan SM, Lamonaca L, Ginès À, Fernández-Esparrach G, Facciorusso A, Larghi A. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:225-234. [PMID: 35915956 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : It is unknown whether there is an advantage to using the wet-suction or slow-pull technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with new-generation needles. We aimed to compare the performance of each technique in EUS-FNB. METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, crossover trial including patients with solid lesions of ≥ 1 cm. Four needle passes with 22 G fork-tip or Franseen-type needles were performed, alternating the wet-suction and slow-pull techniques in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the histological yield (samples containing an intact piece of tissue of at least 550 μm). Secondary end points were sample quality (tissue integrity and blood contamination), diagnostic accuracy, and adequate tumor fraction. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients with 146 pancreatic and 64 nonpancreatic lesions were analyzed. A tissue core was retrieved in 150 (71.4 %) and 129 (61.4 %) cases using the wet-suction and the slow-pull techniques, respectively (P = 0.03). The mean tissue integrity score was higher using wet suction (P = 0.02), as was the blood contamination of samples (P < 0.001). In the two subgroups of pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions, tissue core rate and tissue integrity score were not statistically different using the two techniques, but blood contamination was higher with wet suction. Diagnostic accuracy and tumor fraction did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION Overall, the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNB resulted in a higher tissue core procurement rate compared with the slow-pull method. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of samples with adequate tumor fraction were similar between the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbaș
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Anthony Y B Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Scimeca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Carlino
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - R Bogdan Mateescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Lorena Pergola
- Pathology Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Shannon M Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Auriemma F, Fabbri C, Binda C, Coluccio C, Marocchi G, Staiano T, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Eusebi LH, Cirota GG, De Nucci G, Stigliano S, Manes G, Bonanno G, Ofosu A, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:129-137. [PMID: 36044915 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-5263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The advantage of using the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with 22G Franseen needles has not been investigated. We aimed to compare EUS-FNB with MOSE vs. EUS-FNB performed with three needle passes. METHODS : This randomized trial involved 10 Italian referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNB of pancreatic or nonpancreatic solid lesions were included in the study and randomized to the two groups. MOSE was performed by gross visualization of the collected material by the endoscopists and considered adequate when a white/yellowish aggregate core longer than 10 mm was retrieved. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were specimen adequacy, number of needle passes, and safety. RESULTS : 370 patients with 234 pancreatic lesions (63.2 %) and 136 nonpancreatic lesions (36.8 %) were randomized (190 EUS-FNB with MOSE and 180 with standard EUS-FNB). No statistically significant differences were found between EUS-FNB with MOSE and conventional EUS-FNB in terms of diagnostic accuracy (90.0 % [95 %CI 84.8 %-93.9 %] vs. 87.8 % [95 %CI 82.1 %-92.2 %]; P = 0.49), sample adequacy (93.1 % [95 %CI 88.6 %-96.3 %] vs. 95.5 % [95 %CI 91.4 %-98 %]; P = 0.31), and rate of adverse events (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.28). The median number of passes was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB with MOSE group (1 vs. 3; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS : The accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE is noninferior to that of EUS-FNB with three needle passes. MOSE reliably assesses sample adequacy and reduces the number of needle passes required to obtain the diagnosis with a 22G Franseen needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henri Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanna Grazia Cirota
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Bonanno
- Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Madhu D, Fugazza A, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Mangiavillano B, Gkolfakis P, Mohan BP, Hassan C, Repici A. Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Different Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: A Network Meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:839-848.e5. [PMID: 36657607 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is limited evidence on the comparative diagnostic performance of tissue sampling techniques for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare these techniques. METHODS Rates of sample adequacy, blood contamination, and tissue integrity using FNB needles were evaluated. Direct and indirect comparisons were performed among slow-pull technique, "dry suction", "modified wet suction", or "no suction". Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Overall, 9 RCTs (756 patients) were identified. On network meta-analysis, "no suction" technique was significantly inferior to the other techniques (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92 vs slow pull; RR 0.85, 0.78-0.92 vs "dry suction"; RR 0.83, 0.76-0.90 vs "modified wet suction") in terms of sample adequacy. Consequently, "modified wet suction" resulted as the best technique (SUCRA 0.90), with "no suction" showing poorer performance in terms of sample adequacy (SUCRA score 0.14). "Dry suction" was associated with significantly higher rates of blood contamination as compared to slow pull (RR 1.44, 1.15-1.80), whereas "no suction" led to less blood contamination of samples in comparison to other techniques (RR 0.71, 0.52-0.97 vs slow pull; RR 0.49, 0.36-0.66 vs "dry suction"; RR 0.57, 0.40-0.81 vs "modified wet suction"). "Modified wet suction" significantly outperformed "dry suction" in terms of tissue integrity of the sample (RR 1.36, 1.06-1.75). CONCLUSION "Modified wet suction" seems to provide high rates of integrity and adequate samples, although with high blood contamination. "No suction" technique performs significantly worse than other sampling strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Deepak Madhu
- Gastroenterology, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopouleion-Patision" General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Paduano D, Facciorusso A, De Marco A, Ofosu A, Auriemma F, Calabrese F, Tarantino I, Franchellucci G, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage in Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020490. [PMID: 36672438 PMCID: PMC9856645 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a challenging medical problem that often negatively impacts the patient's quality of life (QoL), postoperative complications, and survival rates. Endoscopic approaches to biliary drainage are generally performed by ERCP or, in selected cases, with a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Recent advances in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allow drainage where previous methods have failed. EUS has evolved from a purely diagnostic technique to one that allows a therapeutic approach in the event of ERCP failure in distal MBO. Moreover, the introduction of dedicated accessories and prostheses for EUS-guided transmural biliary drainage (EUS-BD) made these procedures more successful with regard to technical success, clinical outcomes and reduction of adverse events (AEs). Finally, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have improved the therapeutic role of the EUS. Subsequently, the electrocautery enhanced tip of the LAMS (EC-LAMS) allows a direct access of the delivery system to the target lumen, thereby simplifying and reducing the EUS-BD procedure time. EUS-BD using LAMS and EC-LAMS has proven effective and safe with a low rate of AEs. This review aims to evaluate biliary drainage techniques in malignant obstruction, focusing on the role of EUS biliary drainage by LAMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
- Correspondence: (D.P.); (B.M.); Tel.: +39-0331-476205 (D.P.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45201, USA
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40121 Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40121 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21053 Castellanza, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Correspondence: (D.P.); (B.M.); Tel.: +39-0331-476205 (D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Auriemma F, De Marco A, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Endoscopic Ultrasound Gastro-Enteroanastomosis for Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction due to Large Duodenal Diverticula. Dig Dis 2023; 41:819-821. [PMID: 36596281 DOI: 10.1159/000528885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction is a condition characterized by inadequate gastric emptying due to benign or malignant conditions inducing an inadequate oral intake. In recent years, a novel therapeutic treatment for this condition is given by the use of electrocautery lumen-apposing metal stents. In this case report, we want to present an example of a benign condition treated by endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy with the bi-flanged SpaxusTM stent (Taewoong Medical Co.) mounted on electrocautery catheter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mangiavillano B, Calabrese F, Auriemma F, Paduano D, De Marco A, Repici A. Symptomatic cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis treated by EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with gallbladder toilette. Endoscopy 2022; 55:E284-E285. [PMID: 36460039 PMCID: PMC9831762 DOI: 10.1055/a-1974-8765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Federica Calabrese
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA, Italy
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano MI, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano MI, Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mohan BP, Madhu D, Reddy N, Chara BS, Khan SR, Garg G, Kassab LL, Muthusamy AK, Singh A, Chandan S, Facciorusso A, Mangiavillano B, Repici A, Adler DG. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:909-917.e11. [PMID: 35932815 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Assessment of EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) is gathering attention. Studies report good diagnostic parameters with MOSE; however, the overall data are limited. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to report on the pooled diagnostic assessment parameters of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE using fine-needle biopsy sampling (FNB). METHODS Multiple databases were searched (from inception to December 2021), and studies that reported on the diagnostic assessment of EUS-guided tissue acquisition by MOSE were selected. Pooled diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated by standard meta-analysis methods following the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the analysis, and 1508 lesions were biopsy sampled in 1489 patients undergoing EUS-guided tissue acquisition. MOSE definition included a visible core of tissue with opacity and "wormlike" features of adequate size and length (≥4 mm). The pooled accuracy of FNA and/or FNB specimens in yielding a pathologic diagnosis by MOSE was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.6-93.3; I2 = 66%), pooled sensitivity was 91.5% (95% CI, 88.6-93.6; I2 = 66%), pooled specificity was 98.9% (95% CI, 96.6-99.7; I2 = 80%), pooled positive predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.4-99.5; I2 = 33%), and pooled negative predictive value was 55.5% (95% CI, 46.9-63.9; I2 = 95%). Subgroup analyses by newer-generation FNB needles demonstrated similar pooled rates, with minimal adverse events (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9; I2 = 21%). CONCLUSIONS Excellent pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters were demonstrated in EUS-guided tissue acquisition by FNB using the MOSE method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babu P Mohan
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Deepak Madhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Caritas Hospital, Kottayam, Kerala, India
| | - Nitin Reddy
- Department of Internal Medicine, PSG Institute of Medical Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Beatriz Sordi Chara
- Department of Medicine, University of Joinville, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Shahab R Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham's & Children Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gauri Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lena L Kassab
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arun Kumar Muthusamy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, Waterloo, Iowa, USA
| | - Achintya Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Humanitas University, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Repici A. Elective symptomatic gallbladder stone treatment by EUS (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 12:277-278. [PMID: 36510870 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Facciorusso A, Gkolfakis P, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Chandan S, Mohan BP, Crinò SF. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid on-site evaluation for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:458-465. [PMID: 36537383 PMCID: PMC9921973 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in patients with pancreatic masses is still matter of debate. Aim of our meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic outcomes of these two tissue acquisition strategies. Computerized bibliographic search on the main databases was performed through December 2021 and 8 studies were identified (2147 patients). The primary outcome was sample adequacy. Pooled effects were calculated using a random-effects model by means of DerSimonian and Laird test and summary estimates were expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) or mean difference and 95% confidence Interval (CI). There was no difference in terms of baseline variables between the two groups. Pooled sample adequacy was 95.5% (95% CI 93.2%-97.8%) and 88.9% (83.4%-94.5%) in the EUS-FNB + ROSE and EUS-FNB groups, respectively (OR = 2.05, 0.94-4.49; P = 0.07). Diagnostic accuracy resulted significantly superior in the EUS-FNB + ROSE group (OR = 2.49, 1.08-5.73; P = 0.03), particularly when the analysis was restricted to reverse bevel needle (OR = 3.24, 1.19-8.82, P = 0.02), whereas no statistical difference was observed when newer end-cutting needles were used (OR = 0.71, 0.29-3.61, P = 0.56). Diagnostic sensitivity was not significantly different between the two groups (OR = 1.94, 0.84-4.49; P = 0.12), whereas pooled specificity was 100% with both approaches. The number of needle passes needed to obtain diagnostic samples was not significantly different (mean difference 0.07,-0.22 to 0.37; P = 0.62). Our meta-analysis stands for a non-superiority of EUS-FNB + ROSE over EUS-FNB with newer end-cutting needles, whereas ROSE could have still a role when reverse bevel needles are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy,Address for correspondence Dr. Antonio Facciorusso, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia. AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy. E-mail:
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Attikon” University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology Unit, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. EUS-guided ileal-ascending colon anastomosis as an alternative to surgical stoma in the palliation of the cecal cancer invading the ileocecal valve. VideoGIE 2022; 7:460-461. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Spadaccini M, Koleth G, Emmanuel J, Khalaf K, Facciorusso A, Grizzi F, Hassan C, Colombo M, Mangiavillano B, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Carrara S, Repici A. Enhanced endoscopic ultrasound imaging for pancreatic lesions: The road to artificial intelligence. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:3814-3824. [PMID: 36157539 PMCID: PMC9367228 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Early detection of pancreatic cancer has long eluded clinicians because of its insidious nature and onset. Often metastatic or locally invasive when symptomatic, most patients are deemed inoperable. In those who are symptomatic, multi-modal imaging modalities evaluate and confirm pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In asymptomatic patients, detected pancreatic lesions can be either solid or cystic. The clinical implications of identifying small asymptomatic solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) of < 2 cm are tantamount to a better outcome. The accurate detection of SPLs undoubtedly promotes higher life expectancy when resected early, driving the development of existing imaging tools while promoting more comprehensive screening programs. An imaging tool that has matured in its reiterations and received many image-enhancing adjuncts is endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). It carries significant importance when risk stratifying cystic lesions and has substantial diagnostic value when combined with fine needle aspiration/biopsy (FNA/FNB). Adjuncts to EUS imaging include contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS and EUS-elastography, both having improved the specificity of FNA and FNB. This review intends to compile all existing enhancement modalities and explore ongoing research around the most promising of all adjuncts in the field of EUS imaging, artificial intelligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Glenn Koleth
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - James Emmanuel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Queen Elizabeth, Kota Kinabalu 88200, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Fabio Grizzi
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gasteroenterology, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Milan 20800, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A. Correction: How to solve misplacement of a lumen-apposing metal stent during cholecystogastrostomy: immediately perform a second one! Endoscopy 2022; 54:C11. [PMID: 35545097 DOI: 10.1055/a-1842-2558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A. How to solve misplacement of a lumen-apposing metal stent during cholecystogastrostomy: immediately perform a second one! Endoscopy 2022; 54:E421-E422. [PMID: 34496434 DOI: 10.1055/a-1583-8947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Auriemma F, Sferrazza S, Bianchetti M, Savarese MF, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Piazza N, Giuffrida E, Mete LS, Tucci A, Milluzzo SM, Iannelli C, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. From advanced diagnosis to advanced resection in early neoplastic colorectal lesions: Never-ending and trending topics in the 2020s. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:632-655. [PMID: 36158280 PMCID: PMC9353749 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i7.632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy represents the most widespread and effective tool for the prevention and treatment of early stage preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the panorama of cancer screening. In the world there are different approaches to the topic of colorectal cancer prevention and screening: different starting ages (45-50 years); different initial screening tools such as fecal occult blood with immunohistochemical or immune-enzymatic tests; recto-sigmoidoscopy; and colonoscopy. The key aspects of this scenario are composed of a proper bowel preparation that ensures a valid diagnostic examination, experienced endoscopist in detection of preneoplastic and early neoplastic lesions and open-minded to upcoming artificial intelligence-aided examination, knowledge in the field of resection of these lesions (from cold-snaring, through endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, up to advanced tools), and management of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento 38014, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital - Multimedica, Milan 20123, Italy
| | - Maria Flavia Savarese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, General Hospital, Sanremo 18038, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Nicole Piazza
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Enrica Giuffrida
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Lupe Sanchez Mete
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Alessandra Tucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Molinette Hospital, Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin 10126, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Iannelli
- Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Biomedical Science, Hunimed, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese 21053, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mangiavillano B, Moon JH, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Paduano D, Bulajic M, Ofosu A, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Yoo HW, Rea R, Massidda M, Repici A. EUS-guided biliary drainage with a novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen apposing metal stent as first approach for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E998-E1003. [PMID: 35845026 PMCID: PMC9286767 DOI: 10.1055/a-1838-2683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents the gold standard for jaundice palliation in malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) patients. Biliary drainage using electrocautery lumen apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS) is currently a well-established procedure when ERCP fails. We aimed to assess the technical and clinical success of a new EC-LAMS as the first approach to the palliation of malignant jaundice due to MBO in patients unfit for surgery. Patients and methods Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic-guided biliary drainage with the new EC-LAMS were prospectively enrolled. Clinical success was defined as bilirubin level decrease > 15 % 24 hours after EC-LAMS placement. Results Mean age was 76.6 ± 11.56 years, and male patients were 10 (40 %). EC-LAMS placement was technically feasible in 24 patients (96 %) and clinical success rate was 100 %. Only one patient (4 %) experienced a misplacement rescued by an immediate second EC-LAMS placement. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.66 ± 4.22 days. The median overall survival was 7 months (95 % CI 1-7). Conclusions In this preliminary study, the new EC-LAMS seems to allow a single-step palliative endoscopic therapy in patients affected by jaundice due to MBO, with high technical and clinical success and low adverse events. Further large prospective studies are warranted to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | | | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Hae Won Yoo
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Roberta Rea
- Digestive Endoscopy, Campus-Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Facciorusso A, Mangiavillano B, Paduano D, Binda C, Crinò SF, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Fugazza A, Tarantino I, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Fabbri C, Anderloni A. Methods for Drainage of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction after ERCP Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133291. [PMID: 35805062 PMCID: PMC9266204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There is scarce evidence on the comparison between different methods for the drainage of distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of these techniques. We searched main databases through September 2021 and identified five randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was clinical success. The secondary outcomes were technical success, overall and serious adverse event rate. Percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage was found to be inferior to other interventions (PTBD: RR 1.01, 0.88–1.17 with EUS-choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CD); RR 1.03, 0.86–1.22 with EUS-hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HG); RR 1.42, 0.90–2.24 with surgical hepaticojejunostomy). The comparison between EUS-HG and EUS-CD was not significant (RR 1.01, 0.87–1.17). Surgery was not superior to other interventions (RR 1.40, 0.91–2.13 with EUS-CD and RR 1.38, 0.88–2.16 with EUS-HG). No difference in any of the comparisons concerning adverse event rate was detected, although PTBD showed a slightly poorer performance on ranking analysis (SUCRA score 0.13). In conclusion, all interventions seem to be effective for the drainage of DMBO, although PTBD showed a trend towards higher rates of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy;
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy;
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Via Gerenzano 2, 21053 Castellanza, Italy; (B.M.); (D.P.)
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Via Gerenzano 2, 21053 Castellanza, Italy; (B.M.); (D.P.)
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forli, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0543-735056
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy;
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 801385, USA;
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milano, Italy; (A.F.); (A.A.)
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 0039051 Bologna, Italy; (A.L.); (P.F.)
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 0039051 Bologna, Italy; (A.L.); (P.F.)
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forli, Italy;
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milano, Italy; (A.F.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Spatola F, Lamonaca L, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with pyloric occlusion by proximal flange of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent: solving a rare adverse event. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E918-E919. [PMID: 35790185 PMCID: PMC9735408 DOI: 10.1055/a-1866-3459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mangiavillano B, Repici A. EUS-guided gastro-enteral anastomosis for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction: is the end of the enteral stent? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:587-589. [PMID: 35772181 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2097071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mangiavillano B, Spatola F, Facciorusso A, De Nucci G, Ligresti D, Henry Eusebi L, Lisotti A, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Crinò S, Scarlata S, Troncone E, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Manes G, Traina M, Bertani A, Ofosu A, Binda C, Fabbri C, Muscatiello N, Fusaroli P, Repici A, Carrara S. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:757-762. [PMID: 35482928 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Intraparenchymal lung masses inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound guidance pose a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, some fragile or hypoxic patients may be poor candidates for transbronchial approaches. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) offers a potential diagnostic approach to lung cancers adjacent to the esophagus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of trans-esophageal EUS-FNA/FNB for tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB between March 2015 and August 2021 at eight Italian endoscopic referral centers. RESULTS A total of 47 patients (36 male; mean age 64.47 ± 9.05 years) were included (22 EUS-FNAs and 25 EUS-FNBs). Overall diagnostic accuracy rate was 88.9% (76.3-96.2%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were superior for EUS FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.73%); P = 0.05, and (100% vs. 78.57%); P = 0.05, respectively. Additionally, sample adequacy was superior for EUS-FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.5%); P = 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed nodule size at the cutoff of 15 mm (OR 2.29, 1.04-5.5, P = 0.05) and use of FNB needle (OR 4.33, 1.05-6.31, P = 0.05) as significant predictors of higher diagnostic accuracy. There were no procedure-related adverse events. CONCLUSION This study highlights the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA/FNB as a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and staging peri-esophageal parenchymal lung lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
| | - Federica Spatola
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan
| | - Dario Ligresti
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | | | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Stefano Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
| | - Simone Scarlata
- Geriatrics, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology, Campus Bio-Medico University and Teaching Hospital, Rome
| | - Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome
| | | | - Giampiero Manes
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Mario Traina
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Alessandro Bertani
- IRCCS - ISMETT, Thoracic Surgery, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Bianchetti M, Spatola F, Galtieri P, Maselli R, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Rectal band ligation as a treatment for chronic radiation proctitis: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E787-E790. [PMID: 35692922 PMCID: PMC9187420 DOI: 10.1055/a-1821-0776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) occurs in 5 % to 20 % of patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and frequently manifests with rectal bleeding. Endoscopic management of more severe and refractory cases can be challenging. Rectal band ligation (RBL) has been shown to be a feasible alternative to current available techniques, especially in extensive CRP. Our aim is to evaluate clinical and technical success of RBL. Patients and methods We enrolled all consecutive patients treated with RBL for severe or recurrent hemorrhagic CRP. Success was defined as endoscopic evidence of complete rectal healing and/or cessation of bleeding not requiring further treatment or blood transfusion. Results We enrolled 10 patients (7 males, mean age 75.6 years). Median length of the CRP from the anal verge was 4.5 cm and mean surface area involved was 89 %. Eight patients (80 %) were naïve to endoscopic treatment, while two had undergone argon plasma coagulation (APC). Median follow-up was 136.5 days. Success was achieved in 100 % of patients after a mean number of 1.8 RBL sessions. A mean number of 4.7 bands were released in the first session while a mean of 3.1 and 2 bands were placed in the second and third sessions, respectively. As for adverse events, only one patient reported mild tenesmus and pelvic pain after the procedure. Conclusions RBL is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP. It could be considered a valid first-line option in case of extensive rectal involvement as well as a viable rescue treatment after failed APC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Piera Galtieri
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lisotti A, Crinò SF, Mangiavillano B, Cominardi A, Ofosu A, Brighi N, Metelli F, Zagari RM, Facciorusso A, Fusaroli P. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of splenic lesions: systematic review with pooled analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac022. [PMID: 35663151 PMCID: PMC9154069 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Focal splenic lesions are usually incidentally discovered on radiological assessments. Although percutaneous tissue acquisition (TA) under trans-abdominal ultrasound guidance is a well-established technique for obtaining cyto-histological diagnosis of focal splenic lesions, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided TA has been described in several studies, reporting different safety and outcomes. The aim was to assess the pooled safety, adequacy, and accuracy of EUS-TA of splenic lesions. Methods A comprehensive review of available evidence was conducted at the end of November 2021. All studies including more than five patients and reporting about the safety, adequacy, and accuracy of EUS-TA of the spleen were included. Results Six studies (62 patients) were identified; all studies have been conducted using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles. Pooled specimen adequacy and accuracy of EUS-TA for spleen characterization were 92.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 86.3%–99.3%] and 88.2% (95% CI, 79.3%–97.1%), respectively. The pooled incidence of adverse events (six studies, 62 patients) was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.4%–9.7%). Conclusion EUS-FNA of the spleen is a safe technique with high diagnostic adequacy and accuracy. The EUS-guided approach could be considered a valid alternative to the percutaneous approach for spleen TA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Anna Cominardi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nicole Brighi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCSS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Medola, Italy
| | - Flavio Metelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gkolfakis P, Crinò SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1067-1077.e15. [PMID: 35124072 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evidence is limited on the comparative diagnostic performance of newer end-cutting fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of available FNB needles for sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. METHODS A systematic literature review (Medline and Cochrane Database) was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy of newer FNB needles in adults undergoing EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were sample adequacy, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and adverse event rate. We performed pairwise and network meta-analyses and appraised the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS Overall, 16 RCTs (1934 patients) were identified. On network meta-analysis, Franseen needles (Acquire; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass, USA) significantly outperformed reverse-bevel needles (risk ratio [RR], 1.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-1.40] for accuracy and 1.31 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22] for adequacy) and FNA needles (RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25] for accuracy and 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.13] for adequacy). Likewise, the Fork-tip needle (SharkCore; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was significantly superior to the reverse-bevel needle (RR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.03-1.33] for accuracy and 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16] for adequacy) and to the FNA needle (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19] for accuracy and 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07] for adequacy). Other comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. As a consequence, Franseen (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .89 for accuracy and .94 for adequacy) and Fork-tip needles (surface under the cumulative ranking score, .76 for accuracy and .73 for adequacy) ranked as the 2 highest-performing FNB needles. When considering different needle sizes, 25-gauge Franseen and 25-gauge Fork-tip needles were not superior to 22-gauge reverse-bevel needles (RR, 1.18 [95% CI, .96-1.46] and 1.04 [95% CI, .62-1.52]). None of the tested needles was significantly superior to the other FNB devices or to FNA needles when rapid onsite cytologic evaluation was available. CONCLUSIONS Franseen and Fork-tip needles, particularly 22-gauge size, showed the highest performance for tissue sampling of pancreatic masses, with low confidence in estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Repici A. Gastrojejunostomy in a patient with previous choledochoduodenostomy and duodenal stent with transcholedocical approach. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E847-E848. [PMID: 35613919 PMCID: PMC9735335 DOI: 10.1055/a-1838-3985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mangiavillano B, Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Underwater colonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy of a hypogastric neoplastic lesion. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E822-E823. [PMID: 35561989 PMCID: PMC9735281 DOI: 10.1055/a-1816-7521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fugazza A, Fabbri C, Di Mitri R, Petrone MC, Colombo M, Cugia L, Amato A, Forti E, Binda C, Maida M, Sinagra E, Repici A, Tarantino I, Anderloni A, Donato G, de Nucci G, Manno M, Pollino V, Macchiarelli R, Leone N, Badas R, Lovera M, Armellini E, Redaelli A, Mangiavillano B, Brancaccio ML, Attili F, Togliani T, Aragona G, Khalaf K, Conte E. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: a retrospective nationwide analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:896-904.e1. [PMID: 34995640 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been proposed as an alternative procedure in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) and failed ERCP. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective analysis included all cases of EUS-CDS with LAMS performed in patients with DMBO and failed ERCP in 23 Italian centers from January 2016 to July 2020. Primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of the adverse event (AE) rate and variables associated with technical success. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-six patients (44.9% women) with a mean age of 73.9 ± 12.6 years were included in the study. The most common etiology of DMBO was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (75%), followed by ampullary cancer (8.6%) and cholangiocarcinoma (6.6%). The common bile duct median diameter was 17.3 ± 3.9 mm. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 239 of 256 (93.3%), and 230 of 239 (96.2%) patients, respectively. The mean follow-up was 151 ± 162 days. Twenty-seven AEs occurred in 25 of 239 patients (10.5%) (3 mild, 21 moderate, and 3 severe). No fatal AEs occurred. Reinterventions to manage AEs with endoscopic or radiologic procedures occurred in 22 patients (9.2%). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study show that EUS-CDS with LAMSs in patients with DMBO and failed ERCP represent a viable alternative in terms of effectiveness and safety with acceptable AE rates. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03903523.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Cugia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy (Department of Emergency), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Digestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Ca'Granda Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- Gastroenterology & Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto G Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giulio Donato
- Department of Gastroenterology, 'Maggiore della Carità' Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI)
| | - Mauro Manno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, USL Modena, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicola Leone
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Badas
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mauro Lovera
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elia Armellini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate, Bergamo
| | | | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas - Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | - Fabia Attili
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aragona
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Ofosu A, Muscatiello N, Mangiavillano B, Lamonaca L, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Gkolfakis P, Stasi E, Samanta J, Dhar J, Cotsoglou C, Castillo JL, Antonini F. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:676-683. [PMID: 35264310 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.01.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A direct comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and current endoscopic biopsy techniques in patients with subepithelial lesions (SELs) is still lacking. Aim of this multicenter study was to compare the diagnostic performance and safety profile between EUS-FNB and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy. METHODS Out of 416 patients undergoing endoscopic sampling of SELs between 2017 and 2021, after propensity score matching two groups were compared: 120 undergoing EUS-FNB and 120 sampled with bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy. Primary outcome was sample adequacy. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and adverse events. RESULTS Median age was 61 years and most patients were male in both groups. Final diagnosis was GIST in 65 patients (54.1%) in the EUS-FNB group and 62 patients in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (51.6%; p = 0.37). Sample adequacy was significantly higher in the EUS-FNB group as compared to the bite-on-bite biopsy group (94.1% versus 77.5%, p<0.001). EUS-FNB outperformed bite-on-bite biopsy also in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.3% versus 67.1%, p<0.001) and sensitivity (89% vs 64.5%; p<0.001), whereas specificity was 100% in both groups (p = 0.89). These findings were confirmed in subgroup analysis according to SEL location, final diagnosis, and wall layers of the sampled SEL. Adverse event rate was 6.6% in the EUS-FNB group and 30% in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION EUS-FNB outperforms bite-on-bite biopsy both in terms of diagnostic yield and safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, 45221 Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy; Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elisa Stasi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, 'Vito Fazzi' Hospital, Lecce UK
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | | | | | - Filippo Antonini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Marche Polytechnic University, A. Murri Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Bianchetti M, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Bike handlebar grip in the rectum: minimally invasive endoscopic management. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E42-E43. [PMID: 33682900 DOI: 10.1055/a-1362-9026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Bianchetti M, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Correction: Bike handlebar grip in the rectum: minimally invasive endoscopic management. Endoscopy 2022; 54:C7. [PMID: 35580783 DOI: 10.1055/a-1842-1975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Lisotti A, Papanikolaou IS, Mangiavillano B, Tarantino I, Anderloni A, Fabbri C, Triantafyllou K, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac062. [PMCID: PMC9632631 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition represents the choice of methods for suspected lymph nodes (LNs) located next to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to compare the pooled diagnostic performance of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for LNs sampling.
Methods
We searched PubMed/MedLine and Embase databases through August 2021. Primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy; secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, sample adequacy, optimal histological core procurement, number of passes, and adverse events. We performed a pairwise meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference along with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
We identified nine studies (1,276 patients) in this meta-analysis. Among these patients, 66.4% were male; the median age was 67 years. Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between the two approaches (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81–2.10; P = 0.270). The accuracy of EUS-FNB was significantly higher when being performed with newer end-cutting needles (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17–3.00; P = 0.009) and in abdominal LNs (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.52–4.05; P < 0.001) than that of EUS-FNA. No difference in terms of sample adequacy was observed between the two approaches (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.46–4.26; P = 0.550); however, histological core procurement and diagnostic sensitivity with EUS-FNB were significantly higher than those with EUS-FNA (OR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.51–25.07; P = 0.010 and OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.27–2.74, P = 0.001). The number of needle passes needed was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB group than in the EUS-FNA group (mean difference, −0.54; 95% CI, −0.97 to −0.12; P = 0.010).
Conclusions
EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB perform similarly in LN sampling; however, FNB performed with end-cutting needles outperformed FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia , Foggia, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona , Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona , Verona, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) , Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health , Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna , Imola, Italy
| | - Ioannis S Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital , Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT , Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS , Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna , Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘Attikon’ University General Hospital , Athens, Greece
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna , Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Fabbri C, Mangiavillano B, Lisotti A, Muscatiello N, Cotsoglou C, Fusaroli P. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:51-57. [PMID: 34918578 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2020645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is still unclear whether endoscopic ultrasound liver biopsy (EUS-LB) determines superior results in comparison to percutaneous liver biopsy (PC-LB). Aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of these two techniques. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Literature search was conducted through June 2021 and identified 7 studies. The primary outcome was total length of specimen. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference along with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Pooled total length of specimen was 29.9 mm (95% CI 24.1-35.7) in the EUS-LB group and 29.7 mm (95% CI 27.1-32.2) in the PC-LB group, with no difference between the two approaches (mean difference -0.35 mm, 95% CI -5.31 to 4.61; p = 0.89), although sensitivity analysis restricted to higher quality studies found a superior performance of PC-LB over EUS-LB. Pooled number of complete portal tracts was 12.9 (7.7-18) in the EUS-LB and 14.4 (10.7-18) in the PC-LB group, with no difference in direct comparison (mean difference -1.58, -5.98 to 2.81; p = 0.48). No difference between the two groups was observed in terms of severe adverse event rate (OR 1.11, 0.11-11.03; p = 0.93). CONCLUSION EUS-LB and PC-LB are comparable in terms of diagnostic performance and safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.,Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, the Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, the Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooklyn Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Ausl Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, Ospedali Riuniti Di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sosa-Valencia L, Huppertz J, Wanert F, Haberzetser F, Swanström L, Mangiavillano B, Eisendrath P, Deprez P, Robles-Medranda C, Carrara S, Al-Haddad M, Vilmann P, Koch S, Larghi A, Khashab M. Design and validation of a therapeutic EUS training program using a live animal model: Taking training to the next level. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:112-121. [PMID: 35488623 PMCID: PMC9059805 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS has evolved into a therapeutic modality for gastrointestinal disorders. Simulators, ex vivo models, and phantoms are the current teaching methods for therapeutic EUS (TEUS). We create and evaluate a high-fidelity simulated live animal model (HiFi SAM) for teaching endoscopists TEUS. Materials and Methods: Designing a curriculum that uses HiFi SAM and enables trainees to perform realistic procedures with expert mentors. Results: Twenty-seven trainees participated in a 3-day program with 6 h of theoretical and 14 h of hands using life HiFi SAM. Eighteen experts participated. Twenty-two (20–25) TEUS were defined for each HiFi SAM, and 616 were performed in all. Of 616/264 (43%) were evaluated with a mean of 88 per course (ranging between 80 and 95). Ninety-one percent (240/264) of the procedures were completed successfully. In 24, success was not achieved due to technical and/or model problems. Student rating of HiFi SAM was: 71% excellent rating (scale 8–10) and 95% excellent/good. The HiFi SAM procedure evaluation was (scale 1–5): fine-needle biopsy: 4.79, radiofrequency: 4.76, common bile duct and gallbladder drainage: 4.75, cystic drainages: 4.72, neurolysis: 4.55, microbiopsy: 4.50, and hepatogastric drainage: 4.04, with an overall satisfaction rate of 4.56 (91%). A short survey showed: 83% would recommend absolutely (17% most likely), 33% think that ITEC training was sufficient for their practice, and 66% would like additional training, especially more practice in specific techniques rather than more clinical case discussion. Regarding impact on their practice, 66% of the trainees started a new procedure and/or noted improvement in previous ones. Conclusion: HiFi SAM is a complex model; however, experts and trainees are satisfied with the training this new curriculum provided.
Collapse
|
49
|
De Luca L, Di Berardino M, Mangiavillano B, Repici A. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries: Indications, applications, efficacy and training perspective. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1180-1189. [PMID: 34754386 PMCID: PMC8554716 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i10.1180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection was introduced in Japan for the mini-invasive treatment of early gastric cancer, as part of national screening program considering high prevalence of disease in these latitudes. This technique allows en-bloc curative oncological excision and to obtain in a single step R0-resection, characterization, histological staging and potential cure of the tumor with a very high cost-benefit balance. Over the years, Western endoscopists have adopted endoscopic submucosal dissection, achieving good rates of efficacy, long-term improved outcomes and safety, with low risk of local recurrence comparable to those obtained in Asian institutes. However, according to some authors, the excellent outcomes from East country could not be representative of the Western experience. Despite epidemiological differences of early gastric cancer, scant volume data and limitations in training opportunities between Western and Eastern countries, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have adopted Japanese guidelines and developed a European core curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training. Endoscopists should be able to estimate the probability of performing a curative resection by considering the benefit/risk relationship case-by-case in order to implement a correct decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca De Luca
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Riuniti Marche North Hospital, Pesaro 61121, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Bianchetti M, Repici A. A cholecystoduodenostomy with a new type of lumen-apposing metal stent. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1203. [PMID: 32888827 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini Castellanza, VA, Italy; Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit - Humanitas Mater Domini Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan; Italy
| |
Collapse
|