1
|
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, Inzani F, Rimbaș M, Lisotti A, Manfredi G, Teoh AYB, Mangiavillano B, Sendino O, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Scimeca D, Unti E, Carlino A, Voiosu T, Mateescu RB, Fusaroli P, Lega S, Buscarini E, Pergola L, Chan SM, Lamonaca L, Ginès À, Fernández-Esparrach G, Facciorusso A, Larghi A. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:225-234. [PMID: 35915956 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : It is unknown whether there is an advantage to using the wet-suction or slow-pull technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) with new-generation needles. We aimed to compare the performance of each technique in EUS-FNB. METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, crossover trial including patients with solid lesions of ≥ 1 cm. Four needle passes with 22 G fork-tip or Franseen-type needles were performed, alternating the wet-suction and slow-pull techniques in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the histological yield (samples containing an intact piece of tissue of at least 550 μm). Secondary end points were sample quality (tissue integrity and blood contamination), diagnostic accuracy, and adequate tumor fraction. RESULTS Overall, 210 patients with 146 pancreatic and 64 nonpancreatic lesions were analyzed. A tissue core was retrieved in 150 (71.4 %) and 129 (61.4 %) cases using the wet-suction and the slow-pull techniques, respectively (P = 0.03). The mean tissue integrity score was higher using wet suction (P = 0.02), as was the blood contamination of samples (P < 0.001). In the two subgroups of pancreatic and nonpancreatic lesions, tissue core rate and tissue integrity score were not statistically different using the two techniques, but blood contamination was higher with wet suction. Diagnostic accuracy and tumor fraction did not differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSION Overall, the wet-suction technique in EUS-FNB resulted in a higher tissue core procurement rate compared with the slow-pull method. Diagnostic accuracy and the rate of samples with adequate tumor fraction were similar between the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbaș
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Anthony Y B Teoh
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Scimeca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Carlino
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - R Bogdan Mateescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Lorena Pergola
- Pathology Department, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Shannon M Chan
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mangiavillano B, Crinò SF, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Barbera C, Larghi A, Rizzatti G, Carrara S, Spadaccini M, Auriemma F, Fabbri C, Binda C, Coluccio C, Marocchi G, Staiano T, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Eusebi LH, Cirota GG, De Nucci G, Stigliano S, Manes G, Bonanno G, Ofosu A, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Endoscopy 2023; 55:129-137. [PMID: 36044915 DOI: 10.1055/a-1915-5263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The advantage of using the macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) technique during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with 22G Franseen needles has not been investigated. We aimed to compare EUS-FNB with MOSE vs. EUS-FNB performed with three needle passes. METHODS : This randomized trial involved 10 Italian referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNB of pancreatic or nonpancreatic solid lesions were included in the study and randomized to the two groups. MOSE was performed by gross visualization of the collected material by the endoscopists and considered adequate when a white/yellowish aggregate core longer than 10 mm was retrieved. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes were specimen adequacy, number of needle passes, and safety. RESULTS : 370 patients with 234 pancreatic lesions (63.2 %) and 136 nonpancreatic lesions (36.8 %) were randomized (190 EUS-FNB with MOSE and 180 with standard EUS-FNB). No statistically significant differences were found between EUS-FNB with MOSE and conventional EUS-FNB in terms of diagnostic accuracy (90.0 % [95 %CI 84.8 %-93.9 %] vs. 87.8 % [95 %CI 82.1 %-92.2 %]; P = 0.49), sample adequacy (93.1 % [95 %CI 88.6 %-96.3 %] vs. 95.5 % [95 %CI 91.4 %-98 %]; P = 0.31), and rate of adverse events (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %; P = 0.28). The median number of passes was significantly lower in the EUS-FNB with MOSE group (1 vs. 3; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS : The accuracy of EUS-FNB with MOSE is noninferior to that of EUS-FNB with three needle passes. MOSE reliably assesses sample adequacy and reduces the number of needle passes required to obtain the diagnosis with a 22G Franseen needle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bernardoni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Henri Eusebi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanna Grazia Cirota
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Manes
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Bonanno
- Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas - Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini - Castellanza, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Repici A. Elective symptomatic gallbladder stone treatment by EUS (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 12:277-278. [PMID: 36510870 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA); Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan; Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. EUS-guided ileal-ascending colon anastomosis as an alternative to surgical stoma in the palliation of the cecal cancer invading the ileocecal valve. VideoGIE 2022; 7:460-461. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A. Correction: How to solve misplacement of a lumen-apposing metal stent during cholecystogastrostomy: immediately perform a second one! Endoscopy 2022; 54:C11. [PMID: 35545097 DOI: 10.1055/a-1842-2558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Spatola F, Repici A. How to solve misplacement of a lumen-apposing metal stent during cholecystogastrostomy: immediately perform a second one! Endoscopy 2022; 54:E421-E422. [PMID: 34496434 DOI: 10.1055/a-1583-8947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Auriemma F, Sferrazza S, Bianchetti M, Savarese MF, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Piazza N, Giuffrida E, Mete LS, Tucci A, Milluzzo SM, Iannelli C, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. From advanced diagnosis to advanced resection in early neoplastic colorectal lesions: Never-ending and trending topics in the 2020s. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:632-655. [PMID: 36158280 PMCID: PMC9353749 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i7.632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy represents the most widespread and effective tool for the prevention and treatment of early stage preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions in the panorama of cancer screening. In the world there are different approaches to the topic of colorectal cancer prevention and screening: different starting ages (45-50 years); different initial screening tools such as fecal occult blood with immunohistochemical or immune-enzymatic tests; recto-sigmoidoscopy; and colonoscopy. The key aspects of this scenario are composed of a proper bowel preparation that ensures a valid diagnostic examination, experienced endoscopist in detection of preneoplastic and early neoplastic lesions and open-minded to upcoming artificial intelligence-aided examination, knowledge in the field of resection of these lesions (from cold-snaring, through endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, up to advanced tools), and management of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento 38014, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital - Multimedica, Milan 20123, Italy
| | - Maria Flavia Savarese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, General Hospital, Sanremo 18038, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza 21053, Italy
| | - Nicole Piazza
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Enrica Giuffrida
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Giaccone", Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Lupe Sanchez Mete
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome 00144, Italy
| | - Alessandra Tucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Molinette Hospital, Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin 10126, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Iannelli
- Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Rozzano 20089, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Biomedical Science, Hunimed, Pieve Emanuele 20090, Italy
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Varese 21053, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mangiavillano B, Moon JH, Facciorusso A, Di Matteo F, Paduano D, Bulajic M, Ofosu A, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Yoo HW, Rea R, Massidda M, Repici A. EUS-guided biliary drainage with a novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen apposing metal stent as first approach for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E998-E1003. [PMID: 35845026 PMCID: PMC9286767 DOI: 10.1055/a-1838-2683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents the gold standard for jaundice palliation in malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) patients. Biliary drainage using electrocautery lumen apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS) is currently a well-established procedure when ERCP fails. We aimed to assess the technical and clinical success of a new EC-LAMS as the first approach to the palliation of malignant jaundice due to MBO in patients unfit for surgery. Patients and methods Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic-guided biliary drainage with the new EC-LAMS were prospectively enrolled. Clinical success was defined as bilirubin level decrease > 15 % 24 hours after EC-LAMS placement. Results Mean age was 76.6 ± 11.56 years, and male patients were 10 (40 %). EC-LAMS placement was technically feasible in 24 patients (96 %) and clinical success rate was 100 %. Only one patient (4 %) experienced a misplacement rescued by an immediate second EC-LAMS placement. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.66 ± 4.22 days. The median overall survival was 7 months (95 % CI 1-7). Conclusions In this preliminary study, the new EC-LAMS seems to allow a single-step palliative endoscopic therapy in patients affected by jaundice due to MBO, with high technical and clinical success and low adverse events. Further large prospective studies are warranted to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | | | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Hae Won Yoo
- Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Roberta Rea
- Digestive Endoscopy, Campus-Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paduano D, Auriemma F, Spatola F, Lamonaca L, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with pyloric occlusion by proximal flange of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent: solving a rare adverse event. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E918-E919. [PMID: 35790185 PMCID: PMC9735408 DOI: 10.1055/a-1866-3459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mangiavillano B, Spatola F, Facciorusso A, De Nucci G, Ligresti D, Henry Eusebi L, Lisotti A, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Crinò S, Scarlata S, Troncone E, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Manes G, Traina M, Bertani A, Ofosu A, Binda C, Fabbri C, Muscatiello N, Fusaroli P, Repici A, Carrara S. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:757-762. [PMID: 35482928 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Intraparenchymal lung masses inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound guidance pose a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, some fragile or hypoxic patients may be poor candidates for transbronchial approaches. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) offers a potential diagnostic approach to lung cancers adjacent to the esophagus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of trans-esophageal EUS-FNA/FNB for tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB between March 2015 and August 2021 at eight Italian endoscopic referral centers. RESULTS A total of 47 patients (36 male; mean age 64.47 ± 9.05 years) were included (22 EUS-FNAs and 25 EUS-FNBs). Overall diagnostic accuracy rate was 88.9% (76.3-96.2%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were superior for EUS FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.73%); P = 0.05, and (100% vs. 78.57%); P = 0.05, respectively. Additionally, sample adequacy was superior for EUS-FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.5%); P = 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed nodule size at the cutoff of 15 mm (OR 2.29, 1.04-5.5, P = 0.05) and use of FNB needle (OR 4.33, 1.05-6.31, P = 0.05) as significant predictors of higher diagnostic accuracy. There were no procedure-related adverse events. CONCLUSION This study highlights the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA/FNB as a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and staging peri-esophageal parenchymal lung lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
| | - Federica Spatola
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Milan
| | - Dario Ligresti
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | | | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza VA
| | - Stefano Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona
| | - Simone Scarlata
- Geriatrics, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology, Campus Bio-Medico University and Teaching Hospital, Rome
| | - Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome
| | | | - Giampiero Manes
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Mario Traina
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Palermo
| | - Alessandro Bertani
- IRCCS - ISMETT, Thoracic Surgery, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, AUSL Romagna, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital and Bufalini Hospital, Forlì- Cesena
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Bianchetti M, Spatola F, Galtieri P, Maselli R, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Rectal band ligation as a treatment for chronic radiation proctitis: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E787-E790. [PMID: 35692922 PMCID: PMC9187420 DOI: 10.1055/a-1821-0776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) occurs in 5 % to 20 % of patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and frequently manifests with rectal bleeding. Endoscopic management of more severe and refractory cases can be challenging. Rectal band ligation (RBL) has been shown to be a feasible alternative to current available techniques, especially in extensive CRP. Our aim is to evaluate clinical and technical success of RBL. Patients and methods We enrolled all consecutive patients treated with RBL for severe or recurrent hemorrhagic CRP. Success was defined as endoscopic evidence of complete rectal healing and/or cessation of bleeding not requiring further treatment or blood transfusion. Results We enrolled 10 patients (7 males, mean age 75.6 years). Median length of the CRP from the anal verge was 4.5 cm and mean surface area involved was 89 %. Eight patients (80 %) were naïve to endoscopic treatment, while two had undergone argon plasma coagulation (APC). Median follow-up was 136.5 days. Success was achieved in 100 % of patients after a mean number of 1.8 RBL sessions. A mean number of 4.7 bands were released in the first session while a mean of 3.1 and 2 bands were placed in the second and third sessions, respectively. As for adverse events, only one patient reported mild tenesmus and pelvic pain after the procedure. Conclusions RBL is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP. It could be considered a valid first-line option in case of extensive rectal involvement as well as a viable rescue treatment after failed APC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Piera Galtieri
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Lamonaca L, Repici A. Gastrojejunostomy in a patient with previous choledochoduodenostomy and duodenal stent with transcholedocical approach. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E847-E848. [PMID: 35613919 PMCID: PMC9735335 DOI: 10.1055/a-1838-3985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mangiavillano B, Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Spatola F, Repici A. Underwater colonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy of a hypogastric neoplastic lesion. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E822-E823. [PMID: 35561989 PMCID: PMC9735281 DOI: 10.1055/a-1816-7521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, Ofosu A, Muscatiello N, Mangiavillano B, Lamonaca L, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Gkolfakis P, Stasi E, Samanta J, Dhar J, Cotsoglou C, Castillo JL, Antonini F. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy for sampling of subepithelial lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:676-683. [PMID: 35264310 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.01.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A direct comparison between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and current endoscopic biopsy techniques in patients with subepithelial lesions (SELs) is still lacking. Aim of this multicenter study was to compare the diagnostic performance and safety profile between EUS-FNB and bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy. METHODS Out of 416 patients undergoing endoscopic sampling of SELs between 2017 and 2021, after propensity score matching two groups were compared: 120 undergoing EUS-FNB and 120 sampled with bite-on-bite jumbo biopsy. Primary outcome was sample adequacy. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and adverse events. RESULTS Median age was 61 years and most patients were male in both groups. Final diagnosis was GIST in 65 patients (54.1%) in the EUS-FNB group and 62 patients in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (51.6%; p = 0.37). Sample adequacy was significantly higher in the EUS-FNB group as compared to the bite-on-bite biopsy group (94.1% versus 77.5%, p<0.001). EUS-FNB outperformed bite-on-bite biopsy also in terms of diagnostic accuracy (89.3% versus 67.1%, p<0.001) and sensitivity (89% vs 64.5%; p<0.001), whereas specificity was 100% in both groups (p = 0.89). These findings were confirmed in subgroup analysis according to SEL location, final diagnosis, and wall layers of the sampled SEL. Adverse event rate was 6.6% in the EUS-FNB group and 30% in the bite-on-bite biopsy group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION EUS-FNB outperforms bite-on-bite biopsy both in terms of diagnostic yield and safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, 45221 Cincinnati, OH, United States of America
| | - Nicola Muscatiello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy; Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elisa Stasi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, 'Vito Fazzi' Hospital, Lecce UK
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | | | | | - Filippo Antonini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Marche Polytechnic University, A. Murri Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fugazza A, Lamonaca L, Mercante G, Civilini E, Pradella A, Anderloni A, Repici A. The worst adverse event for an endoscopist after esophageal stent placement: an aortoesophageal fistula. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E44-E45. [PMID: 33682894 DOI: 10.1055/a-1368-3677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mercante
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Efrem Civilini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.,Vascular Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Andrea Pradella
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Conti Bellocchi MC, Marconato E, Lamonaca L, Cattani Mottes M, Ciccocioppo R, Carrara S, de Pretis N, Gabbrielli A, Crinò SF, Frulloni L. The features and clinical outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease associated with autoimmune pancreatitis: A greater awareness is needed. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e28602. [PMID: 35089195 PMCID: PMC8797592 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been described in 5% to 40% of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence, endoscopic features, and outcome of IBD in association with AIP.A retrospective analysis including all consecutive patients with AIP and a histological diagnosis of IBD from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Demographical data, AIP, and IBD features, as well as clinical course, were recorded.Among 267 AIP patients, 45 were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) (27 men, mean age 31.6), all with a diagnosis of type 2 AIP. The most frequent presentation of AIP was acute pancreatitis (55.5%). Both diffuse (51.1%) and focal (48.9%) pancreatic involvement were observed. The AIP relapse rate was 11.1% over a mean follow-up of 55 months. In 69% of patients, the interval time between the diagnosis of AIP and UC was <1 year. When UC was present at AIP onset, UC was in clinical remission in 50% of patients. Fecal calprotectin levels, when available, were elevated in 86.6% of these patients. Mostly, mild-moderate pancolitis was initially diagnosed (55.5%). During follow-up, escalation therapy for UC was required in 40% of patients after a mean time of 45 months. Two patients (4.4%) underwent colectomy.The prevalence of UC in AIP patients was 17%. Mild pancolitis with a low rate of colectomy was found. Greater awareness is needed to avoid a delayed diagnosis of UC, and the dosage of fecal calprotectin levels could have a role in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eugenio Marconato
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Martina Cattani Mottes
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Rachele Ciccocioppo
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Nicolo’ de Pretis
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Taveira F, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Ponchon T, Benamouzig R, Bugajski M, de Castelbajac F, Cesaro P, Chergui H, Goran L, Minelli Grazioli L, Janičko M, Januszewicz W, Lamonaca L, Lenz J, Negreanu L, Repici A, Spada C, Spadaccini M, State M, Szlak J, Veseliny E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M. The Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS): a two-phase evaluation study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:45-51. [PMID: 33285583 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-4325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no scale has been validated to assess bubbles associated with bowel preparation. This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability of a novel scale - the Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS). METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study with two online evaluation phases of 45 randomly distributed still colonoscopy images (15 per scale grade). Observers assessed images twice, 2 weeks apart, using CEBuS (CEBuS-0 - no or minimal bubbles, covering < 5 % of the surface; CEBuS-1 - bubbles covering 5 %-50 %; CEBuS-2 - bubbles covering > 50 %) and reporting the clinical action (do nothing; wash with water; wash with simethicone). RESULTS CEBuS provided high levels of agreement both in evaluation Phase 1 (4 experts) and Phase 2 (6 experts and 13 non-experts), with almost perfect intraobserver reliability: kappa 0.82 (95 % confidence interval 0.75-0.88) and 0.86 (0.85-0.88); interobserver agreement - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.83 (0.73-0.89) and 0.90 (0.86-0.94). Previous endoscopic experience had no influence on agreement among experts vs. non-experts: kappa 0.86 (0.80-0.91) vs. 0.87 (0.84-0.89) and ICC 0.91 (0.87-0.94) vs. 0.90 (0.86-0.94), respectively. Interobserver agreement on clinical action was ICC 0.63 (0.43-0.78) in Phase 1 and 0.77 (0.68-0.84) in Phase 2. Absolute agreement on clinical action per scale grade was 85 % (82-88) for CEBuS-0, 21 % (16-26) for CEBuS-1, and 74 % (70-78) for CEBuS-2. CONCLUSION CEBuS proved to be a reliable instrument to standardize the evaluation of colonic bubbles during colonoscopy. Assessment in daily practice is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Taveira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Robert Benamouzig
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (APHP), Bobigny, France
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Paola Cesaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Hasnae Chergui
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (APHP), Bobigny, France
| | - Loredana Goran
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Martin Janičko
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Wladyslaw Januszewicz
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Jamila Lenz
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Lucian Negreanu
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Monica State
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jakub Szlak
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eduard Veseliny
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Areia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Antonini F, Macarri G, Carrara S, Lamonaca L, Di Mitri R, Conte E, Fabbri C, Binda C, Ofosu A, Gasparini E, Turri C, Stornello C, Celsa C, Larghi A, Manfrin E, Gabbrielli A, Facciorusso A, Tacelli M. Impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic head lesions: A multicenter study. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10:440-447. [PMID: 34975042 PMCID: PMC8785671 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives There is no clear evidence of a negative impact of biliary stents on the diagnostic yield of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing pancreatic head lesions. We aimed to evaluate the association between the presence of biliary stents and the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective study including all jaundiced patients secondary to pancreatic head masses was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of a biliary stent placed before EUS-FNB. Pathological results were classified according to the Papanicolaou classification and compared against the final diagnosis. Diagnostic measures in the two groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses including potential factors affecting EUS-FNB accuracy were performed. Results Overall, 842 patients were included, 495 (58.8%) without and 347 (41.2%) with biliary stent. A plastic or a metal stent was placed in 217 (62.5%) and 130 (37.5%) cases, respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher in patients without biliary stent than in those with stent (91.9% and 92.1% vs. 85.9% and 86.4%, P = 0.010 At multivariate analyses, lesion size (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.01) and presence of biliary stent (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89, P = 0.01) were independently associated with diagnostic accuracy. In the subgroup of patients with biliary stent, the type of stent (plastic vs. metal) did not impact EUS-FNB yield, whereas the use of larger bore needles enhanced diagnostic accuracy (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.28-4.12, P = 0.005). Conclusions In this large retrospective study, an indwelling biliary stent negatively impacted the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB. Preferably, EUS-FNB should precede endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, especially in the case of small tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Antonini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Giampiero Macarri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forli-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forli-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Enrico Gasparini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Turri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Caterina Stornello
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Ciro Celsa
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties; Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Crinò SF, Di Mitri R, Nguyen NQ, Tarantino I, de Nucci G, Deprez PH, Carrara S, Kitano M, Shami VM, Fernández-Esparrach G, Poley JW, Baldaque-Silva F, Itoi T, Manfrin E, Bernardoni L, Gabbrielli A, Conte E, Unti E, Naidu J, Ruszkiewicz A, Amata M, Liotta R, Manes G, Di Nuovo F, Borbath I, Komuta M, Lamonaca L, Rahal D, Hatamaru K, Itonaga M, Rizzatti G, Costamagna G, Inzani F, Curatolo M, Strand DS, Wang AY, Ginès À, Sendino O, Signoretti M, van Driel LMJW, Dolapcsiev K, Matsunami Y, van der Merwe S, van Malenstein H, Locatelli F, Correale L, Scarpa A, Larghi A. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:899-909.e5. [PMID: 34116031 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has never been evaluated in a randomized study. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB without ROSE was not inferior to that of EUS-FNB with ROSE. METHODS A noninferiority study (noninferiority margin, 5%) was conducted at 14 centers in 8 countries. Patients with SPLs requiring tissue sampling were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB with or without ROSE using new-generation FNB needles. The touch-imprint cytology technique was used to perform ROSE. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary endpoints were safety, tissue core procurement, specimen quality, and sampling procedural time. RESULTS Eight hundred patients were randomized over an 18-month period, and 771 were analyzed (385 with ROSE and 386 without). Comparable diagnostic accuracies were obtained in both arms (96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = .396). Noninferiority of EUS-FNB without ROSE was confirmed with an absolute risk difference of 1.0% (1-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.1% to 3.1%; noninferiority P < .001). Safety and sample quality of histologic specimens were similar in both groups. A significantly higher tissue core rate was obtained by EUS-FNB without ROSE (70.7% vs. 78.0%, P = .021), with a significantly shorter mean sampling procedural time (17.9 ± 8.8 vs 11.7 ± 6.0 minutes, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating SPLs independently on execution of ROSE. When new-generation FNB needles are used, ROSE should not be routinely recommended. (ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT03322592.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nam Q Nguyen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Vanessa M Shami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Unit of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Erminia Manfrin
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Conte
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elettra Unti
- Pathology Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jeevinesh Naidu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia
| | | | - Michele Amata
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS-ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Rosa Liotta
- Pathology Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS - ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Milano, Italy
| | - Franca Di Nuovo
- Pathology Unit, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese (MI), Italy
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Mina Komuta
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Mariangela Curatolo
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Daniel S Strand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marianna Signoretti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karoly Dolapcsiev
- Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yukitoshi Matsunami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Schalk van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannah van Malenstein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Locatelli
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Centre, University of Verona, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; CERTT, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Repici A. A Novel Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent with an Electrocautery Tip for Different Indications: Initial Experience in a Referral Center. Dig Dis 2021; 40:526-529. [PMID: 34348270 PMCID: PMC8450863 DOI: 10.1159/000518539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Recently, a new electrocautery lumen-apposing metal stent (EC-LAMS) has been launched. The primary aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of the freehand placement with intra-channel release of the new EC-LAMS. The secondary aims were to assess technical and clinical outcomes and rates of adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 5 patients (3 F; mean age: 75.6 ± 14.6 years) who underwent new EC-LAMS placement for different indications (cholecystitis, malignant biliary obstruction, and malignant gastric outlet obstruction). We described all the procedures of EC-LAMS placement, providing also a video of one of them (see online suppl. material; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000518539). RESULTS Technical and clinical success was achieved in all patients who underwent new EC-LAMS placement, and no AEs were experienced. All of the EC-LAMS were placed using the freehand technique with intra-channel release. CONCLUSIONS Our initial experience with the new EC-LAMS showed a good performance of this device for different indications, especially if the stents are placed freehand and with intra-channel release. Further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary data and first impression about this new EC-LAMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bendetto Mangiavillano
- *Benedetto Mangiavillano, MD, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas - Mater Domini, Via Gerenzano n.2, 21053- Castellanza (VA), Tel: 0039 0331 476205 - 381, Email address:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
D'Amico F, Amato A, Iannone A, Trovato C, Romana C, Angeletti S, Maselli R, Radaelli F, Fiori G, Viale E, Di Giulio E, Soriani P, Manno M, Rondonotti E, Galtieri PA, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Ferrara EC, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Pellegatta G, Spadaccini M, Lamonaca L, Craviotto V, Belletrutti PJ, Hassan C, Repici A. Risk of Covert Submucosal Cancer in Patients With Granular Mixed Laterally Spreading Tumors. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1395-1401. [PMID: 32687977 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Granular mixed laterally spreading tumors (GM-LSTs) have an intermediate level of risk for submucosal invasive cancer (SMICs) without clear signs of invasion (covert); the optimal resection method is uncertain. We aimed to determine the risk of covert SMIC in GM-LSTs based on clinical and endoscopic factors. METHODS We collected data from 693 patients (50.6% male; median age, 69 years) with colorectal GM-LSTs, without signs of invasion, who underwent endoscopic resection (74.2%) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (25.2%) at 7 centers in Italy from 2016 through 2019. We performed multivariate and univariate analyses to identify demographic and endoscopic factors associated with risk of SMIC. We developed a multivariate model to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) to detect 1 SMIC. RESULTS Based on pathology analysis, 66 patients (9.5%) had covert SMIC. In multivariate analyses, increased risk of covert SMIC were independently associated with increasing lesion size (odds ratio per mm increase, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .003) and rectal location (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62-5.83; P = .004). A logistic regression model based on lesion size (with a cutoff of 40 mm) and rectal location identified patients with covert SMIC with 47.0% sensitivity, 82.6% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.69. The NNT to identify 1 patient with a nonrectal SMIC smaller than 4 cm was 20; the NNT to identify 1 patient with a rectal SMIC of 4 cm or more was 5. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of data from 693 patients, we found the risk of covert SMIC in patients with GM-LSTs to be approximately 10%. GM-LSTs of 4 cm or more and a rectal location are high risk and should be treated by en-bloc resection. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03836131.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Gastroenterology Department, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Cristina Trovato
- Division of Endoscopy, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Romana
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Angeletti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Giancarla Fiori
- Division of Endoscopy, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Edi Viale
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Emilio Di Giulio
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Soriani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Modena, Carpi Hospital, Carpi, Italy
| | - Mauro Manno
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Modena, Carpi Hospital, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Elisa Chiara Ferrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paul J Belletrutti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mangiavillano B, Frazzoni L, Togliani T, Fabbri C, Tarantino I, De Luca L, Staiano T, Binda C, Signoretti M, Eusebi LH, Auriemma F, Lamonaca L, Paduano D, Di Leo M, Carrara S, Fuccio L, Repici A. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E901-E906. [PMID: 34079874 PMCID: PMC8159577 DOI: 10.1055/a-1395-7129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The standard method for obtaining samples during endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is fine-needle aspiration (FNA), the accuracy of which can be affected by the presence of a cytopathologist in endoscopy room (rapid on-site evaluation [ROSE]). With the introduction of fine-needle biopsy (FNB), macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of a acquired specimen has been proposed. Only a few studies have evaluated the role of MOSE and in all except one, a 19G needle was used. Our primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of MOSE with different needle sizes and the secondary aim was to identify factors influencing the yield of MOSE. Patients and methods Data from patients who underwent EUS-FNB for solid lesions, with MOSE evaluation of the specimen, were collected in six endoscopic referral centers. Results A total of 378 patients (145 F and 233 M) were enrolled. Needles sizes used during the procedures were 20G (42 %), 22G (45 %), and 25G (13 %). The median number of needle passes was two (IQR 2-3). The overall diagnostic yield of MOSE was of 90 % (confidence interval [CI] 86 %-92 %). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, variables independently associated with the diagnostic yield of MOSE were a larger needle diameter (20G vs. 25G, OR 11.64, 95 %CI 3.5-38.71; 22G vs. 25G, OR 6.20, 95 %CI 2.41-15.90) and three of more needle passes (OR 3.39, 95 %CI 1.38-8.31). Conclusions MOSE showed high diagnostic yield and accuracy. Its yield was further increased if performed with a large size FNB needles and more than two passes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA),Humamitas Huniversity
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Poma Hospital Mantova, Mantova, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS - ISMETT), Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca De Luca
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Teresa Staiano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute IRCCS, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo H. Eusebi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA)
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA)
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini – Castellanza (VA)
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humamitas Huniversity,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humamitas Huniversity,Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carrara S, Soldà G, Di Leo M, Rahal D, Peano C, Giunta M, Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Maselli R, Malesci A, Laghi L, Repici A. Side-by-side comparison of next-generation sequencing, cytology, and histology in diagnosing locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:597-604.e5. [PMID: 32640200 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS-guided biopsy sampling is the method of choice for obtaining pancreatic tissue. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been applied to EUS-guided biopsy sampling and may classify patients based on specific molecular profiles. Our study aimed to compare side-by-side the diagnostic yield achievable by genetic identification of somatic mutations detected with NGS versus histologic and cytologic typing in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) in samples acquired under EUS guidance. METHODS We conducted a prospective comparative pilot study at Humanitas Research Hospital. The study included 33 patients referred for LAPC who underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition using a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Material was obtained for both pathologic diagnosis and DNA extraction and targeted NGS analysis with the AmpliSeq Comprehensive Panel v3 (Illumina Inc, San Diego, Calif, USA). Twenty-one genes were prioritized for somatic mutation detection. RESULTS The final diagnosis was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in all patients (100%). A macroscopic core was obtained in 30 patients (91%). In 3 lesions no cores adequate for histologic analysis were obtained, but cytologic analysis revealed tumoral cells from PDAC. DNA was extracted from 32 of 33 samples (97%), most of which (27/32) carried at least 2 clearly pathogenic mutations in different genes. Detection of K-ras mutation allowed for molecular diagnosis of PDAC in most of the patients (30/32). CONCLUSIONS In our study we demonstrated that proper tissue specimens obtained under EUS guidance allowed DNA sample extraction and subsequent NGS analysis in 97% of cases. These results support the potential role of NGS as a complementary diagnostic test to be implemented in association with standard diagnostic modalities. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03578939.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giulia Soldà
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Biology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Daoud Rahal
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Clelia Peano
- Genomic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research, UoS Milan, National Research Council, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Michele Giunta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Biology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Anderloni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alberto Malesci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luigi Laghi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Hereditary Cancer Genetics Clinic, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hassan C, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Iannone A, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, Ferrara E, Spadaccini M, Alkandari A, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Galtieri PA, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Lorenzetti R, Andrealli A, Antonelli G, Wallace M, Sharma P, Rösch T, Repici A. Computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy: classification and relevance of false positives. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:900-904.e4. [PMID: 32561410 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS False positive (FP) results by computer-aided detection (CADe) hamper the efficiency of colonoscopy by extending examination time. Our aim was to develop a classification of the causes and clinical relevance of CADe FPs, and to assess the relative distribution of FPs in a real-life setting. METHODS In a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing colonoscopy with and without CADe (NCT: 04079478), we extracted 40 CADe colonoscopy videos. Using a modified Delphi process, 4 expert endoscopists identified the main domains for the reasons and clinical relevance of FPs. Then, 2 expert endoscopists manually examined each FP and classified it according to the proposed domains. The analysis was limited to the withdrawal phase. RESULTS The 2 main domains for the causes of CADe FPs were identified as artifacts due to either the mucosal wall or bowel content, and clinical relevance was defined as the time spent on FPs and the FP rate per minute. The mean number of FPs per colonoscopy was 27.3 ± 13.1, of which 24 ± 12 (88%) and 3.2 ± 2.6 (12%) were due to artifacts in the bowel wall and bowel content, respectively. Of the 27.3 FPs per colonoscopy, 1.6 (5.7%) required additional exploration time of 4.8 ± 6.2 seconds per FP (ie, 0.7% of the mean withdrawal time). In detail, 15 (24.2%), 33 (53.2%), and 14 (22.6%) FPs were classified as being of mild, moderate, or severe clinical relevance. The rate of FPs per minute of withdrawal time was 2.4 ± 1.2, and was higher for FPs due to artifacts from the bowel wall than for those from bowel content (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 0.3 ± 0.2, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS FPs by CADe are primarily due to artifacts from the bowel wall. Despite a high frequency, FPs result in a negligible 1% increase in the total withdrawal time because most of them are immediately discarded by the endoscopist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome
| | - Matteo Badalamenti
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Loredana Correale
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari
| | | | | | - Elisa Ferrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Asma Alkandari
- Thanyan Alghanim Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alamiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Prateek Sharma
- Kansas City Veterans Affairs Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Milan; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Argollo M, Kotze PG, Lamonaca L, Gilardi D, Furfaro F, Yamamoto T, Danese S. Prevention of Postoperative Recurrence in CD: Tailoring Treatment to Patient Profile. Curr Drug Targets 2020; 20:1327-1338. [PMID: 30894106 DOI: 10.2174/1389450120666190320110809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Crohn's disease (CD) is an immune-mediated condition characterized by the transmural inflammation of the gut tissue, associated with progressive bowel damage often leading to surgical intervention. As operative resection of the damaged segment is not curative, a majority of patients undergoing intestinal resections for complicated CD present disease recurrence within 3 years after the intervention. Postoperative recurrence can be defined as endoscopic, clinical, radiological or surgical. Endoscopic recurrence rates within 1 year exceed 60% and the severity, according to the Rutgeerts' score, is associated with worse prognosis and can predict clinical recurrence (in up to 1/3 of the patients). Most importantly, about 50% of patients will undergo a reoperation after 10 years of their first intestinal resection. Therefore, the prevention of postoperative recurrence in CD remains a challenge in clinical practice and should be properly managed. We aim to summarize the most recent data on the definition, risk factors, assessment and treatment of postoperative CD recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie Argollo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- IBD outpatient clinics, Catholic University of Parana (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Gilardi
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Furfaro
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Takayuki Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery and IBD Centre, Yokkaichi Hazu Medical Centre, Yokkaichi, Japan
| | - Silvio Danese
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, Ferrara E, Spadaccini M, Alkandari A, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Galtieri PA, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Lorenzetti R, Andrealli A, Antonelli G, Wallace M, Sharma P, Rosch T, Hassan C. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:512-520.e7. [PMID: 32371116 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 292] [Impact Index Per Article: 73.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS One-fourth of colorectal neoplasias are missed during screening colonoscopies; these can develop into colorectal cancer (CRC). Deep learning systems allow for real-time computer-aided detection (CADe) of polyps with high accuracy. We performed a multicenter, randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of a CADe system in detection of colorectal neoplasias during real-time colonoscopy. METHODS We analyzed data from 685 subjects (61.32 ± 10.2 years old; 337 men) undergoing screening colonoscopies for CRC, post-polypectomy surveillance, or workup due to positive results from a fecal immunochemical test or signs or symptoms of CRC, at 3 centers in Italy from September through November 2019. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups who underwent high-definition colonoscopies with the CADe system or without (controls). The CADe system included an artificial intelligence-based medical device (GI-Genius, Medtronic) trained to process colonoscopy images and superimpose them, in real time, on the endoscopy display a green box over suspected lesions. A minimum withdrawal time of 6 minutes was required. Lesions were collected and histopathology findings were used as the reference standard. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR, the percentage of patients with at least 1 histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma). Secondary outcomes were adenomas detected per colonoscopy, non-neoplastic resection rate, and withdrawal time. RESULTS The ADR was significantly higher in the CADe group (54.8%) than in the control group (40.4%) (relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.45). Adenomas detected per colonoscopy were significantly higher in the CADe group (mean, 1.07 ±1.54) than in the control group (mean 0.71 ± 1.20) (incidence rate ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.86). Adenomas 5 mm or smaller were detected in a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the CADe group (33.7%) than in the control group (26.5%; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52), as were adenomas of 6 to 9 mm (detected in 10.6% of subjects in the CADe group vs 5.8% in the control group; RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.09-2.86), regardless of morphology or location. There was no significant difference between groups in withdrawal time (417 ± 101 seconds for the CADe group vs 435 ± 149 for controls; P = .1) or proportion of subjects with resection of non-neoplastic lesions (26.0% in the CADe group vs 28.7% of controls; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90-1.12). CONCLUSIONS In a multicenter, randomized trial, we found that including CADe in real-time colonoscopy significantly increases ADR and adenomas detected per colonoscopy without increasing withdrawal time. ClinicalTrials.gov no: 04079478.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Repici
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy.
| | - Matteo Badalamenti
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Elisa Ferrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Asma Alkandari
- Thanyan Alghanim Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alamiri Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Giulio Antonelli
- Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Prateek Sharma
- Kansas City Veterans Affairs Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Thomas Rosch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brozzi L, Petrone MC, Poley JW, Carrara S, Barresi L, Fabbri C, Rimbas M, De Angelis C, Arcidiacono PG, Signoretti M, Lamonaca L, Barbuscio I, Binda C, Gheorghe A, Rizza S, Gabbrielli A, Crinò SF. Outcomes of biliopancreatic EUS in patients with surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E869-E876. [PMID: 32617391 PMCID: PMC7297615 DOI: 10.1055/a-1161-8713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Little is known about outcomes of biliopancreatic endosonography (EUS) in patients with surgically altered upper gastrointestinal (gastrointestinal) anatomy. We aimed to assess the rate of procedural success and EUS-related adverse events (AEs), according to post-surgical anatomies. Patients and methods Retrospective study including patients with post-surgical altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy who underwent EUS for evaluation of the biliopancreatic region between January 2008 and June 2018 at eight European centers. Results Of 242 patients (162 males, mean age 66.4 ± 12.5), 86 had (35.5 %) Billroth II, 77 (31.8 %) pancreaticoduodenectomy, 23 (9.5 %) Billroth I, 19 (7.9 %) distal esophagectomy, 15 (6.2 %) total gastrectomy, 14 (5.8 %) sleeve gastrectomy, and eight (3.3 %) Roux-en-Y. Sleeve gastrectomy, Billroth I, and pancreaticoduodenectomy were associated with high rates of success (100 %, 95.7 %, and 92.2 %, respectively). Visualization of the head of the pancreas was significantly impacted by total gastrectomy, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y (success rates 6.7 %, 53.7 %, and 57.1 %, respectively). Examination of the pancreatic body and tail was impaired in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy (82.4 % and 71.4 %, respectively). Technical success and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) was 78.2 % and 71.3 % (95 % CI, 60.6-80.5), respectively. Four (1.6 %) AEs were observed: one mucosal tearing in a Billroth II patient, one cardiac arrest in a distal esophagectomy patient, one bleed after EUS-TA in a Billroth I patient, and one acute pancreatitis after EUS-TA in a sleeve gastrectomy patient. Conclusions The yield of bilio-pancreatic EUS is dependent on lesion location and surgery type. Before considering EUS in these patients, one must carefully consider whether the lesion may be approachable by EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Brozzi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- PancreatoBiliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Luca Barresi
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Forli-Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forli-Cesena, Italy
| | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudio De Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- PancreatoBiliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Signoretti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Forli-Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forli-Cesena, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Ilenia Barbuscio
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Highly Specialized Therapies), Palermo, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Forli-Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forli-Cesena, Italy
| | - Andrada Gheorghe
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefano Rizza
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Gabbrielli
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pellegatta G, Spadaccini M, Lamonaca L, Craviotto V, D'Amico F, Ceriotti L, Meloni M, Repici A. Evaluation of Human Esophageal Epithelium Permeability in Presence of Different Formulations Containing Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulphate. Med Devices (Auckl) 2020; 13:57-66. [PMID: 32210642 PMCID: PMC7069498 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s234810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose New medical devices that contain hyaluronic acid (HA) and chondroitin sulphate (CS), with or without antacid components, have been developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with the aim of improving oesophageal mucosal defences by creating a film on the oesophageal mucosa and acting as a mechanical barrier against the noxious components of refluxate, both acidic and basic. Methods The film-forming and protective efficacy of medical device A based on HA and CS plus aluminium hydroxide, device B combining HA and CS with magnesium trisilicate and device C with only the combination of HA and CS was tested on a reconstructed human oesophageal epithelium (HO2E/S/5) as a biological model in 2 different pH environments, neutral and acidic, to mimic realistic conditions. Caffeine penetration kinetics and Lucifer yellow (LY) permeability modifications induced by these products were compared to those induced by a negative control series (saline solution, code NC) and positive control series (white Vaseline, code V) under neutral and acidic pH conditions. Results Under neutral and acidic pH conditions, compared to the negative control, all the products tested reduced (>80% and 85–90%, respectively) the caffeine passage, and no significant difference was observed among the products tested. Under neutral and acidic conditions, the LY permeabilities registered with device A and device C were not different from that registered with the negative control, while an LY flux% increase was calculated after 2 hrs of treatment (21.1%) with device B under acidic conditions. Conclusion These results confirm the ability of the products tested to interact with the oesophageal epithelium in order to adhere and create a stable protective film for at least 2 hours after their homogeneous distribution on the epithelium surface. Further clinical studies are needed to test these devices in the topical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Pellegatta
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Spadaccini M, Bhandari P, Maselli R, Spaggiari P, Alkandari AA, Varytimiadis L, Semeraro R, Di Leo M, Galtieri PA, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, D'Amico F, Attardo S, Brambilla T, Sharma P, Hassan C, Repici A. Multi-band mucosectomy for neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: in vivo comparison between two different devices. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3845-3852. [PMID: 31586245 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07150-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-band mucosectomy (MBM) is effective and safe for Barrett's neoplasia. No studies have yet compared the efficacy and safety of the MBM devices commercially available: Duette™ (CookMedical) and Captivator™ (BostonScientific). Our aim is to compare the two devices. METHODS This is a dual-center retrospective case-control study (Rozzano, Portsmouth) comparing efficacy, safety, and histology of resected specimens between Duette™ (DUE) and Captivator™ (CAPT). Efficacy was assessed by R0 and local recurrence (LR) rate. Bleedings, perforations, and strictures were recorded as safety outcomes. Moreover, the specimens were re-examined by two pathologists, blinded about the study group, to assess the maximum thickness of both the whole specimens and the resected submucosal layer. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (38 per group) were included. The two groups did not differ in terms of baseline characteristics. R0 resection was achieved in 96.7% versus 96.3% (p = ns) and LR were recorded in 4/38 (10.5%) versus 3/38 (7.9%) in DUE and CAPT group, respectively (p = ns). Considering Duette™ versus Captivator™, 2 versus 3 patients developed a symptomatic stricture. Only one post-procedural bleeding occurred (Captivator™). Maximum medium thicknesses of specimens and of resected submucosa did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS MBM is safe and effective for resecting visible lesions using either of the two available devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Spaggiari
- Pathology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Asma A Alkandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - Lazaros Varytimiadis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
| | - Rossella Semeraro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Attardo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Prateek Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, 64128, USA
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lamonaca L, Belletrutti PJ, Repici A. Hot Polypectomy: A Cautionary Tale? Gastroenterology 2019; 157:579-580. [PMID: 31102659 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul J Belletrutti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Anderloni AA, Fugazza A, luca maroni, Maselli R, Ormando VM, D'Amico F, Carrara S, Mangiavillano B, Omodei PD, Preatoni P, Lamonaca L, Cappello A, Pellegatta G, Repici A. 1111 FEASIBILITY OF NEW BILIARY AND PANCREATIC BIODEGRADABLE STENT PLACEMENT: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF AN ONGOING SINGLE-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE, PILOT STUDY. Gastrointest Endosc 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
|
32
|
Spadaccini M, Fuccio L, Lamonaca L, Frazzoni L, Maselli R, Di Leo M, Galtieri PA, Craviotto V, D'Amico F, Hassan C, Repici A. Underwater EMR for colorectal lesions: a systematic review with meta-analysis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:1109-1116.e4. [PMID: 30862352 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Underwater EMR is an alternative way to have nonpedunculated colorectal lesions lifted before being resected. The endoscopist takes advantage of the behavior of mucosal lesions floating away from the muscular layer, once immersed in liquid. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique. METHODS Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to May 2018. Full articles including patients with colorectal lesions resected by the underwater EMR technique were eligible. The complete resection (primary outcome), en bloc resection, recurrence, and adverse event rates were pooled by means of a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Ten studies were eligible, providing data on 508 lesions removed from 433 patients (male/female = 239/194; mean age range 62.2-75.0 years). Six studies were performed in the United States and the other in Europe; 7 studies were prospective. The specific indications for performing underwater EMR varied widely across studies. The complete resection rate was 96.36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.77-98.44), with a rate of en bloc resection of 57.07% (95% CI, 43.20%-69.91%). The recurrence rate was 8.82% (95% CI, 5.78-13.25) in a mean endoscopy surveillance period of 7.7 months (range 4-15 months). The postprocedural bleeding rate was 2.85% (95% CI, 1.64-4.90). Bleeding during the procedure was always mild and was considered as part of the procedure in all series. The overall adverse event rate was 3.31% (95% CI, 1.97%-5.52%). No cases of perforation were reported. CONCLUSION According to the results of this systematic review, underwater EMR appears to be an effective and extremely safe technique for resecting nonpolypoid colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (Milano), Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rozzano (Milano), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Aghemo A, Lleo A. No clinical impact of HCV RNA determination at the end of treatment in patients receiving directly acting antivirals. Liver Int 2018; 38:2342-2342.. [PMID: 30218615 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Craviotto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University and Humanitas Research Hospital, Pieve Emanuele (Milano), Italy
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University and Humanitas Research Hospital, Pieve Emanuele (Milano), Italy
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University and Humanitas Research Hospital, Pieve Emanuele (Milano), Italy
| | - Ana Lleo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University and Humanitas Research Hospital, Pieve Emanuele (Milano), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Spadaccini M, Hassan C, Maselli R, D'Amico F, Lamonaca L, Craviotto V, Repici A. Efficacy and safety of SIC-8000 (Eleview®) for submucosal injection for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in an in vivo porcine model. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:260-266. [PMID: 29396133 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Submucosal injection is generally required for both endoscopic-mucosal resection (EMR) and submucosal dissection (ESD). SIC-8000 (Eleview™) is a new FDA 510(k) cleared and CE marked liquid composition for submucosal injection, containing a biocompatible polymer as a cushioning agent. AIMS The aim of this randomized study was to compare Eleview with saline solution when performing upper- and lower-GI EMR/ESD in a porcine model. METHODS EMR/ESD procedures were performed in a total of 10 white domestic pigs comparing Eleview vs. NaCl 0.9% containing methylene blue at 0.001% (control solution) as submucosal solution to be injected. Animals were randomized between EMR (22 procedures) and ESD (22 procedures) and between upper- (8 animals) and lower-(2 animals) GI procedures. All procedures were performed aiming for a resection size of 1 cm × 1 cm for EMR and 2 cm × 2 cm for ESD. Volume of injected fluid, number of injections, time of resection, technical success, en-bloc resection, and adverse events were collected. Endoscopic surveillance was conducted each week for 4 weeks after the EMR/ESD, including biopsies on the margins of resection sites at week-1 of follow-up. After four weeks, pigs were sacrificed and necropsy performed. RESULTS Overall, 22 EMR and 22 ESD were performed in 10 live pigs. The average total volume needed for EMR and ESD was statistically significantly lower with Eleview as compared with control solution for both of the techniques (EMR: 5.6 ± 3.4 ml vs. 11.5 ± 6.7 ml; p = 0.02; ESD: 19.0 ± 10.0 ml vs. 36.3 ± 16.9 ml; p = 0.02). The rate of adverse events was statistically significantly lower in the Eleview than in the control group (2/26, 7.7% vs. 6/18, 33.3%; p = 0.03), but most of them were minor. No difference between Eleview and control solution was found in the rate of technical success (EMR: 11/13, 84.6% vs. 7/9, 77.8%; p = 0.7; ESD: 13/13, 100% vs. 9/9, 100%; p = 1), en-bloc resection (EMR: 6/13, 46.2% vs. NaCl: 5/9, 55.6%; p = 0.06; ESD: 12/13, 92.3% vs. 8/9, 88.9%; p = 0.8), and time of resection (EMR: 9.1 ± 7.75 min vs. 9.4 ± 9.6 min; p = NS; ESD: 38.4 ± 17.2 min vs. 40.2 ± 19.1 min; p = NS). At endoscopic follow up and necropsy, no difference in the process of healing of post-endoscopic ulcer and in the histological inflammation at the site of resection was shown between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The new submucosal injection composition Eleview appeared to be an effective alternative to saline solution for submucosal injection for EMR/ESD, resulting in a substantial reduction of the volume administered to achieve an adequate lifting. No signs of adverse local or distant tissue reaction to Eleview were found at long-term follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando D'Amico
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Laura Lamonaca
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Craviotto
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|