1
|
Lamonaca L, Auriemma F, Paduano D, Bianchetti M, Spatola F, Galtieri P, Maselli R, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Rectal band ligation as a treatment for chronic radiation proctitis: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E787-E790. [PMID: 35692922 PMCID: PMC9187420 DOI: 10.1055/a-1821-0776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) occurs in 5 % to 20 % of patients undergoing pelvic radiation therapy and frequently manifests with rectal bleeding. Endoscopic management of more severe and refractory cases can be challenging. Rectal band ligation (RBL) has been shown to be a feasible alternative to current available techniques, especially in extensive CRP. Our aim is to evaluate clinical and technical success of RBL. Patients and methods We enrolled all consecutive patients treated with RBL for severe or recurrent hemorrhagic CRP. Success was defined as endoscopic evidence of complete rectal healing and/or cessation of bleeding not requiring further treatment or blood transfusion. Results We enrolled 10 patients (7 males, mean age 75.6 years). Median length of the CRP from the anal verge was 4.5 cm and mean surface area involved was 89 %. Eight patients (80 %) were naïve to endoscopic treatment, while two had undergone argon plasma coagulation (APC). Median follow-up was 136.5 days. Success was achieved in 100 % of patients after a mean number of 1.8 RBL sessions. A mean number of 4.7 bands were released in the first session while a mean of 3.1 and 2 bands were placed in the second and third sessions, respectively. As for adverse events, only one patient reported mild tenesmus and pelvic pain after the procedure. Conclusions RBL is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP. It could be considered a valid first-line option in case of extensive rectal involvement as well as a viable rescue treatment after failed APC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lamonaca
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Danilo Paduano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Federica Spatola
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy
| | - Piera Galtieri
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano (MI), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit – Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza (VA), Italy,Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alkandari A, Thayalasekaran S, Bhandari M, Przybysz A, Bugajski M, Bassett P, Kandiah K, Subramaniam S, Galtieri P, Maselli R, Spychalski M, Hayee B, Haji A, Repici A, Kaminski M, Bhandari P. Endoscopic Resections in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicentre European Outcomes Study. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:1394-1400. [PMID: 30994915 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, with estimates ranging 2-18%, depending on the duration of colitis. The management of neoplasia in colitis remains controversial. Current guidelines recommend endoscopic resection if the lesion is clearly visible with distinct margins. Colectomy is recommended if complete endoscopic resection is not guaranteed. We aimed to assess the outcomes of all neoplastic endoscopic resections in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 119 lesions of visible dysplasia in 93 patients, resected endoscopically in inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS A total of 6/65 [9.2%] lesions <20 mm in size were treated by ESD [endoscopic submucosal dissection] compared with 59/65 [90.8%] lesions <20 mm treated by EMR [endoscopic mucosal resection]; 16/51 [31.4%] lesions >20 mm in size were treated by EMR vs 35/51 [68.6%] by ESD. Almost all patients [97%] without fibrosis were treated by EMR, and patients with fibrosis were treated by ESD [87%], p < 0.001. In all, 49/78 [63%] lesions treated by EMR were resected en-bloc and 27/41 [65.9%] of the ESD/KAR [knife-assisted resection] cases were resected en-bloc, compared with 15/41 [36.6%] resected piecemeal. Seven recurrences occurred in the cohort. Seven complications occurred in the cohort; six were managed endoscopically and one patient with a delayed perforation underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS Larger lesions with fibrosis are best treated by ESD, whereas smaller lesions without fibrosis are best managed by EMR. Both EMR and ESD are feasible in the management of endoscopic resections in colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Alkandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - S Thayalasekaran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - M Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - A Przybysz
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Bugajski
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - P Bassett
- Statistics, Statsconsultancy, Amersham, UK
| | - K Kandiah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - S Subramaniam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - P Galtieri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - R Maselli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Spychalski
- University of Lodz, Center of Bowel Treatment, Brzeziny, Poland
| | - B Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kings Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, London, UK
| | - A Haji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kings Institute of Therapeutic Endoscopy, London, UK
| | - A Repici
- Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Kaminski
- Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - P Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|