1
|
Campbell AA, Barroso J, Mogos M, Weitlauf A, Karp SM. Breastfeeding Journeys: Comparing Mothers' Experiences with Autistic and Neurotypical Infants. J Autism Dev Disord 2024:10.1007/s10803-024-06669-9. [PMID: 39699765 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06669-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
Breastfeeding is a complex task that requires proficiency at several key developmental skills to feed successfully. It is unclear how Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects an infant's breastfeeding experience and conflicting reports exist on shortened breastfeeding duration in infants later diagnosed with ASD. The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of mothers breastfeeding both their autistic and neurotypical children to better understand the differences in their breastfeeding experiences and maternal and infant factors that contributed to breastfeeding cessation in their autistic child. Twenty-four mothers of an autistic child who had feeding difficulties in the first 12 months of life, initiated breastfeeding, and also had a neurotypical child participated in semi-structured interviews regarding breastfeeding initiation, cessation, and challenges encountered during breastfeeding. Analysis revealed four major themes: (1) the struggle with latch, including infant behavior that hindered latching; (2) breastfeeding challenges, including problematic breastfeeding behavior by the infant; (3) cessation of breastfeeding, including physical symptoms of the infant that lead to breastfeeding cessation; and (4) breastfeeding the neurotypical sibling, including mother's detection of different breastfeeding behaviors in neurotypical and autistic child. Breastfeeding behaviors described by mothers may indicate early signs of autism including early sensory sensitivity, lack of regulation, repetitive behaviors, and impaired social behaviors. Further research is needed to discern if these breastfeeding behaviors can be used to help identify early signs of autism and employed as additional surveillance for neurodevelopmental concerns at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Campbell
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Julie Barroso
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Amy Weitlauf
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sharon M Karp
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okada J, Wilson E, Wong J, Luo M, Fiechtner L, Simione M. Financial impacts and community resources utilization of children with feeding difficulties. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:508. [PMID: 36008797 PMCID: PMC9409617 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the extent to which financial impacts and community resources utilization are associated with pediatric feeding difficulties. We hypothesize that children with feeding difficulties will have more financial impacts and community resources utilization than children without feeding difficulties. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2017-2018 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) regarding 14,960 children 0-5 years. NSCH utilized random sampling of families across the United States to collect nationally representative data. Outcomes included out-of-pocket costs, caregivers leaving a job due to the child's health, food insufficiency, receival of food or cash assistance, and receival of special education and/or developmental services. We used a multivariable logistic regression controlling for sociodemographic factors to examine the associations of feeding difficulties with financial impacts and community resources utilization outcomes. RESULTS Out of 14,690 respondents, children were a mean (SD) age of 2.53(0.03) years and 1.7% reported feeding difficulties. These children had higher odds of having out-of-pocket costs of ≥$1000 (OR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.61, 5.62), having a caregiver that left a job due to their child's health (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 2.01, 4.98), experiencing food insufficiency (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.71), and receiving special education and/or developmental services (OR 3.98; 95% CI: 2.46, 6.45) than children without feeding difficulties. CONCLUSIONS Children with feeding difficulties are more likely to have financial impacts and community resources utilization than children without feeding difficulties. This information can be used to tailor interventions to improve family-centered care and outcomes for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Okada
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Erin Wilson
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - John Wong
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Man Luo
- Division of General Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St, Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lauren Fiechtner
- Division of General Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St, Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meg Simione
- Division of General Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, 125 Nashua St, Suite 860, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson E, Simione M, Polley L. Paediatric oral sensorimotor interventions for chewing dysfunction: A scoping review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 56:1316-1333. [PMID: 34423521 PMCID: PMC8585681 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chewing dysfunction can have adverse effects on growth, development and quality of life. There is a lack of evidence-based consensus guidelines for sensorimotor intervention. To address this, we need to understand the current state of the science in clinical sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction and systematically plan a research agenda and priorities for the field. AIMS The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the extent, range and nature of evidence for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. METHODS & PROCEDURES This scoping review entailed five phases that included: identification of the research question; identification of relevant studies; study selection; data charting; and collation, summarization and report of the results. Treatment studies that were peer-reviewed and written in English were included. All studies involved a paediatric population and included an oral sensorimotor and/or chewing intervention. Information regarding study design, population, intervention, comparator, outcome measures and findings were extracted. MAIN CONTRIBUTION Of the 21 studies included in this scoping review, 53% were specific to children with cerebral palsy. All interventions were multi-component in nature and the treatment studies included a range of study designs, but few were controlled trials with comparators. A wide variety of outcomes measures were used within and across studies to determine treatment effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The findings suggest that in a small number of studies, sensorimotor interventions provide preliminary evidence for effectiveness in specific populations. These and other treatment protocols must be trialled in additional clinical populations and settings to improve the evidence base for sensorimotor treatment of paediatric chewing dysfunction. This review also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Paediatric feeding disorders are highly prevalent and children often have chewing dysfunction that results in significant negative consequences. We lack evidence-based sensorimotor treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction, which directly impacts the care clinicians can provide children. What this study adds to existing knowledge This scoping review is the first step in examining the literature to understand the current state of the science for oral sensorimotor interventions for paediatric chewing dysfunction. Few randomized controlled studies were identified and a majority included children with cerebral palsy. Most of the interventions were multi-component and included a variety of treatment approaches. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The results of this scoping review can be used as an initial reference for clinicians selecting treatment approaches for chewing dysfunction. It also serves to help prioritize research agendas and further motivates the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines for paediatric chewing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Wilson
- Speech and Feeding Disorders Laboratory, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meg Simione
- Division of General Pediatrics, Mass General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lydia Polley
- Department of Speech Pathology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edwards S, Hyman PE, Mousa H, Bruce A, Cocjin J, Dean K, Fleming K, Romine RS, Davis AM. iKanEat: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of megestrol as a component of a pediatric tube weaning protocol. Trials 2021; 22:169. [PMID: 33640012 PMCID: PMC7913389 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05131-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although tube feeding routinely saves the lives of children who do not eat by mouth, chronic tube feeding can be a burden to patients, caregivers, and families. Very few randomized trials exist regarding the best methods for weaning children from their feeding tubes. Methods The current paper describes a randomized controlled trial of an empirically supported outpatient treatment protocol for moving children from tube to oral eating called iKanEat. Specifically, we describe the methods of randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial which includes a 4-week course of megestrol, the only medication used in the iKanEat protocol, to determine whether the addition of megestrol results in improved child outcomes. The primary and secondary aims are to assess the safety and efficacy of megestrol as part of the iKanEat protocol. The third aim is to provide critical information about the impact of the transition from tube to oral feeding on parent stress and parent and child quality of life. Discussion This trial will provide data regarding whether megestrol is a safe and effective component of the iKanEat tube weaning protocol, as well as important data on how the tube weaning process impacts parent stress and parent and child quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#03815019. Registered on January 17, 2019
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Edwards
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Paul E Hyman
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, New Orleans Children's Hospital, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Hayat Mousa
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of California San Diego/Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Amanda Bruce
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MS 4004, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.,Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Jose Cocjin
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Kelsey Dean
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MS 4004, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.,Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Kandace Fleming
- Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | | | - Ann M Davis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MS 4004, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. .,Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Impact of Behavioral Feeding Intervention on Child Emotional and Behavioral Functioning, Parenting Stress, and Parent-Child Attachment. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69:383-387. [PMID: 31107793 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Behavioral intervention is the only treatment for pediatric feeding problems with well documented empirical support. However, parents may be hesitant to pursue behavioral intervention because of concerns about possible negative side effects on child behavioral health and the parent-child relationship. This study investigated associations between behavioral feeding treatment and parenting stress, internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in young children, and parent-child attachment quality. METHODS Participants included 16 mother-child dyads seeking treatment from a behavioral feeding clinic at a large Midwestern university medical center. Children were between the ages of 30 and 45 months (adjusted) at baseline. Caregivers completed the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1.5 to 5 (CBCL/1.5-5), the Parenting Stress Index, 3rd Edition Short Form (PSI/SF), and mother-child dyads participated in the Strange Situation procedure at baseline and again after 6 months. The treatment group (n = 12) began outpatient behavioral feeding intervention following the baseline evaluation, whereas the control group (n = 12) remained on the clinic waitlist until after the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS The treatment group demonstrated decreases in internalizing and externalizing child behavior problems and parenting stress compared with the control group. No significant differences were demonstrated in parent-child attachment quality within or between groups. CONCLUSIONS Behavioral feeding intervention had positive effects on perceptions of child emotional and behavioral functioning and maternal parenting stress. Intervention also did not impact the quality of the mother-child attachment relationship. Further research with a larger sample size and additional observational measures of behavior is needed to support the replicability and generalizability of these results.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
This article provides an update based on recently published literature and expert consensus on the current state of knowledge regarding feeding and eating disorders in children aged 2 to 12 years. It covers the 6 main diagnostic categories-pica, rumination disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder-discussing issues and findings specific to this age group. It highlights the need for ongoing research in a number of key areas, to include improved understanding of etiologic pathways, characterization of presenting disorders, and the development of standardized evidence-based assessment tools and treatment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Bryant-Waugh
- Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK; Population, Policy and Practice Programme, University College London Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|