1
|
Crouch E, Andersen TS, Smith HP. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Positive Childhood Experiences Among United States Military Children. Mil Med 2024; 189:e1072-e1079. [PMID: 37897695 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many facets of military life are contributors to child health including frequent mobility, family separation, and increased risk to parental physical and mental health, as well as strong social networks and military support systems; yet, there has not been an examination of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and positive childhood experiences (PCEs) among military children. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study used the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health, limited to children aged 6 to 17 years of age, to examine the association between a child who has ever had a caregiver on active duty and their exposure to ACEs and PCEs (n = 54,256 children). Bivariate analyses used Pearson's chi-squared tests and were weighted to be nationally representative. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between military status and selected ACEs. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in PCEs between military and civilian children. Compared to children with a civilian caregiver, children who had a caregiver who had ever served on active duty had a higher odds of experiencing domestic violence (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), 1.61; 95% CI 1.23-2.11), mental health issues or depression in the household (aOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52), and substance use (aOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.55). CONCLUSIONS This study complements and extends previous research that has taken a deficit approach and focused exclusively on the hardships faced by children in military families. The findings from this study may be instructive for child welfare advocates and policymakers as they intervene in communities with programming that promotes PCEs among children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Crouch
- Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29210, USA
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery Building, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Tia S Andersen
- Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Hayden P Smith
- Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chooey J, Scott M, Patterson P, Jordan B, Roy D, Flake E. Military HealthySteps Pilot Program Outcome Study. Mil Med 2023; 188:e2880-e2884. [PMID: 36426384 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usac372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Military families face many unique challenges, including frequent separations, demanding work hours, and relocations. The HealthySteps (HS) program may offset these challenges utilizing the expertise of a nonclinical child development specialist called a HS specialist who offers enhanced well-child visits (WCVs), support between visits, and connections to community resources. Our study sought to identify the impact of the military HS pilot program on the timeliness of WCVs, immunizations, routine behavioral and developmental screenings, and referrals to community resources within the first 15 months of life (MOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed charts of 26 HS-enrolled and 26 randomly selected age-matched non-HS-enrolled children from age 2 to 15 MOL. Demographic variables obtained include child's gender, child's birth order, mother's age, active duty parent's rank classification, and active duty parent's gender. We examined five outcomes measures aligning with the American Academy of Pediatrics health supervision, immunization, and screening recommendations and National Committee for Quality Assurance Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures: (1) completed six or more WCVs in the first 15 MOL, (2) completed developmental screening at the 9-month WCV, (3) up to date on vaccinations at 15 MOL, (4) completed three or more postpartum depression (PPD) screens in the first 6 MOL, and (5) the total number of documented referrals to community resources within the first 15 MOL. Chi-square analysis and independent t-tests were used to compare the groups. RESULTS There was no statistical significance (P > .05) between the HS-enrolled and control groups for all five demographic variables. A significantly higher percentage of children in the HS-enrolled group received PPD screening compared to the control group (96% vs. 73.1%, P = .021). The HS-enrolled group had a higher mean number of community resource referrals at 15 MOL of 2.46 (SD = 1.14) vs. the control group with a mean of 0.19 (SD = 0.49). None of the other outcomes showed a statistically significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate the positive impacts of the military HS program on referrals to community resources and PPD screening, reflecting the HS specialist focus on the family unit. Limitations of this study include the small population size and limited demographic information resulting from the retrospective nature of the study and pilot status of the HS program. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the true impact of the HS program in the military health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Chooey
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| | - Matthew Scott
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| | - Paul Patterson
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| | - Bonnie Jordan
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| | - Daniel Roy
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| | - Eric Flake
- Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meyer EG, DeSilva RB, Hann MC, Aggarwal NK, Brim WL, Engel CC, Lu FG, Lewis-Fernández R. Adapting the Cultural Formulation Interview for the Military. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:978-983. [PMID: 35193377 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE U.S. military service members, veterans, and their families increasingly seek care from providers with limited knowledge of military culture. The 16-item core DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) was designed to integrate cultural factors into assessment and treatment of mental disorders. Although the CFI was designed for use with all patients, it is unknown whether the CFI adequately assesses military culture. The authors describe a methodology to determine the need for specific CFI versions and how to create a version for use with persons affiliated with the military. METHODS Published articles on cultural competence in the military were systematically reviewed. Cultural domains were abstracted from each article, inductively coded, and hierarchically organized for assessment against the core CFI. A military CFI was created with additional implementation instructions, questions, and probes when the core CFI was inadequate for eliciting relevant cultural domains. RESULTS Sixty-three articles were included. Coding revealed 22 military culture domains, of which only five would be elicited in the core CFI without additional guidance. Twelve of 16 questions in the core CFI required additional instructions, five benefited from question edits, and 10 needed additional probing questions. On the basis of these results, the authors crafted a military version of the CFI for service members, veterans, and their families. CONCLUSIONS The military CFI for clinicians assesses aspects of military culture that are not comprehensively evaluated through the core CFI. The development process described in this article may inform the creation of other versions when the core CFI does not comprehensively assess cultural needs for specific populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric G Meyer
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Ravi B DeSilva
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Michael C Hann
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Neil K Aggarwal
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - William L Brim
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Charles C Engel
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Francis G Lu
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| | - Roberto Lewis-Fernández
- Department of Psychiatry (Meyer, Hann) and Center for Deployment Psychology (Brim), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Directorate for Mental Health, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego (DeSilva); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (DeSilva, Aggarwal, Lewis-Fernández); Directorate for Mental Health, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan (Hann); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Engel); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento (Lu)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
London AS. Depression and mental health service use among 12-17 year old U.S. adolescents: Associations with current parental and sibling military service. SSM Popul Health 2021; 16:100920. [PMID: 34660876 PMCID: PMC8503900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine whether having a parent and/or a sibling currently serving in the military is associated with major depression and use of mental health services among 12-17 year old adolescents in the United States. Method Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses are conducted using pooled data from the 2016-2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Analyses are weighted and standard errors are adjusted for the complex sampling design. Results Adolescents are more likely to have a sibling than a parent currently serving in the military. Having a sibling currently in the military increases the likelihood of having a lifetime and a past-year major depressive episode (MDE), but not a past-year MDE with severe role impairment or use of mental health services. Having a parent in the military is not associated with any measure of MDE, but increases use of specialty outpatient, specialty inpatient/residential, and non-specialty mental health services net of MDE and sociodemographic controls. Conclusion Considerable attention has focused on risk and resilience among the dependent children of current service members. A better understanding of how the current military service experiences of siblings, as well as parents, influences related adolescents' mental health, mental health care service use, substance use, and health behaviors has the potential to contribute to programs and interventions that can enhance the well-being of youth with intra-generational, as well as inter-generational, connections to the military. Adolescents who have a sibling currently serving in the military are an at-risk population for MDE and potentially other mental and behavioral health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S London
- Associate Dean and Professor of Sociology, Faculty Associate, Aging Studies Institute, Research Affiliate, Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, 200 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244-1020, United States
| |
Collapse
|