1
|
Lv B, Zhang Z, Chen B, Yu S, Song M, Yu Y, Lu T, Sun L, Qian H. The effects of different halogenated-pyrethroid pesticides on soil microbial community. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 958:177882. [PMID: 39644647 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 11/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
The application of pesticides increases crop yields but affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community. Halogens are common functional modification groups in chemical compounds, and innovative pesticides have been developed on the basis of these groups. However, the effects of different halogen substituents on soil microorganisms remain unclear. This study investigated the effects of three pyrethroid pesticides (deltamethrin, cypermethrin, and cyfluthrin) on the soil microbiota. Our results revealed that all these pesticides significantly reduced the stability of the bacterial communities and decreased bacterial diversity at high concentrations. Compared with deltamethrin (Br-) and cypermethrin (Cl-), low concentrations (0.5 mg/kg) of cyfluthrin (F-) increased soil bacterial diversity by 23.14 % and increased the potential for nitrogen fixation by 2.00 % and nitrification by 3.39 %, thus making it a relatively eco-friendly option. Our findings provide new insights into the potential ecological effects of halogenated pyrethroid pesticides on soil ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binghai Lv
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Zhenyan Zhang
- Institute for Advanced Study, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, PR China; College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, PR China
| | - Bingfeng Chen
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Siqi Yu
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Minglong Song
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Yitian Yu
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Tao Lu
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Liwei Sun
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China
| | - Haifeng Qian
- College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahid M, Singh UB, Farah MA, Al-Anazi KM. Short-term responses of identified soil beneficial-bacteria to the insecticide fipronil: toxicological impacts. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2024; 40:403. [PMID: 39627469 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04203-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/15/2024]
Abstract
Pesticides including insecticides are often applied to prevent distortion posed by plant insect pests. However, the application of these chemicals detrimentally affected the non-target organisms including soil biota. Fipronil (FIP), a broad-spectrum insecticide, is extensively used to control pests across the globe. The frequent usage calls for attention regarding risk assessment of undesirable effects on non-target microorganisms. Here, laboratory-based experiments were conducted to assess the effect of FIP on plant-beneficial bacteria (PBB); Rhizobium leguminosarum (Acc. No. PQ578652), Azotobacter salinestris (Acc. No. PQ578649) and Serratia marcescens (Acc. No. PQ578651). PBB synthesized growth regulating substances were negatively affected by increasing fipronil concentrations. For instance, at 100 µg FIPmL-1, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis by bacterial strains followed the order: A. salinestris (95.6%) S. marcescens (91.6%) > R. leguminosarum (87%). Also, exposure of bacteria cells to FIP hindered the growth and morphology of PBB observed as distortion, cracking, and aberrant structure under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Moreover, FIP-treated and propidium iodide (PI)-stained bacterial cells displayed an insecticide dose-dependent increase in cellular permeability as observed under a confocal laser microscope (CLSM). Colony counts (log10 CFU mL-1) and growth of A. salinestris was completely inhibited at 150 µg FIPmL-1. The surface adhering ability (biofilm formation) of PBB was also disrupted/inhibited in a FIP dose-related manner. The respiration loss due to FIP was coupled with a reduction in population size. Fipronil at 150 µgmL-1 decreased cellular respiration in A. salinestris (72%) S. marcescens (53%) and R. leguminosarum (85%). Additionally, biomarker enzymes; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), lipid peroxidation (LPO), and oxidative stress (catalase; CAT) induced by FIP represented significant (p ≤ 0.05) toxicity towards PBB strains. Conclusively, fipronil suggests a toxic effect that emphasizes their careful monitoring in soils before application and their optimum addition in the soil-plant system. It is high time to prepare both target-specific and slow-released agrochemical formulation for crop protection with concurrent safeguarding of soils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Shahid
- ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (NBAIM), Kushmaur, Mua Nath Bhanjan, Mau, Uttar Pradesh, 275103, India.
| | - Udai B Singh
- ICAR-National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (NBAIM), Kushmaur, Mua Nath Bhanjan, Mau, Uttar Pradesh, 275103, India
| | - Mohammad Abul Farah
- Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Mashay Al-Anazi
- Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malakshahi Kurdestani A, Francioli D, Ruser R, Piccolo A, Maywald NJ, Chen X, Müller T. Optimizing nitrogen fertilization in maize: the impact of nitrification inhibitors, phosphorus application, and microbial interactions on enhancing nutrient efficiency and crop performance. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2024; 15:1451573. [PMID: 39416481 PMCID: PMC11479917 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1451573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
Despite the essential role of nitrogen fertilizers in achieving high crop yields, current application practices often exhibit low efficiency. Optimizing nitrogen (N) fertilization in agriculture is, therefore, critical for enhancing crop productivity while ensuring sustainable food production. This study investigates the effects of nitrification inhibitors (Nis) such as Dimethyl Pyrazole Phosphate (DMPP) and Dimethyl Pyrazole Fulvic Acid (DMPFA), plant growth-promoting bacteria inoculation, and phosphorus (P) application on the soil-plant-microbe system in maize. DMPFA is an organic nitrification inhibitor that combines DMP and fulvic acid for the benefits of both compounds as a chelator. A comprehensive rhizobox experiment was conducted, employing varying levels of P, inoculant types, and Nis, to analyze the influence of these factors on various soil properties, maize fitness, and phenotypic traits, including root architecture and exudate profile. Additionally, the experiment examined the effects of treatments on the bacterial and fungal communities within the rhizosphere and maize roots. Our results showed that the use of Nis improved plant nutrition and biomass. For example, the use of DMPFA as a nitrification inhibitor significantly improved phosphorus use efficiency by up to 29%, increased P content to 37%, and raised P concentration in the shoot by 26%, compared to traditional ammonium treatments. The microbial communities inhabiting maize rhizosphere and roots were also highly influenced by the different treatments. Among them, the N treatment was the major driver in shaping bacterial and fungal communities in both plant compartments. Notably, Nis reduced significantly the abundance of bacterial groups involved in the nitrification process. Moreover, we observed that each experimental treatment employed in this investigation could select, promote, or reduce specific groups of beneficial or detrimental soil microorganisms. Overall, our results highlight the intricate interplay between soil amendments, microbial communities, and plant nutrient dynamics, suggesting that Nis, particularly DMPFA, could be pivotal in bolstering agricultural sustainability by optimizing nutrient utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Francioli
- Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany
| | - Reiner Ruser
- Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Alessandro Piccolo
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, Portici, Italy
| | | | - Xinping Chen
- College of Resources and Environment, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| | - Torsten Müller
- Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu-Xu L, Ma L, Farvardin A, García-Agustín P, Llorens E. Exploring the impact of plant genotype and fungicide treatment on endophytic communities in tomato stems. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1453699. [PMID: 39397796 PMCID: PMC11469548 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1453699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
This study examines how plant genotype can influence the microbiome by comparing six tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum) based on their traditional vs. commercial backgrounds. Using Illumina-based sequencing of the V6-V8 regions of 16S and ITS2 rRNA genes, we analyzed and compared the endophytic bacterial and fungal communities in stems to understand how microbiota can differ and be altered in plant genotypes and the relation to human manipulation. Our results reflect that traditional genotypes harbor significantly more exclusive microbial taxa and a broader phylogenetic background than the commercial ones. Traditional genotypes were significantly richer in Eurotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes fungi, while Lasiosphaeriaceae was more prevalent in commercial genotypes. TH-30 exhibited the highest bacterial abundance, significantly more than commercial genotypes, particularly in Actinomycetia, Bacteroidia, and Gammaproteobacteria. Additionally, traditional genotypes had higher bacterial diversity, notably in orders like Cytophagales, Xanthomonadales, and Burkholderiales. Moreover, we performed an evaluation of the impact of a systemic fungicide (tebuconazole-dichlofluanide) to simulate a common agronomic practice and determined that a single fungicide treatment altered the stem endophytic microbiota. Control plants had a higher prevalence of fungal orders Pleosporales, Helotiales, and Glomerellales, while treated plants were dominated by Sordariomycetes and Laboulbeniomycetes. Fungal community diversity significantly decreased, but no significant impact was observed on bacterial diversity. Our study provides evidence that the background of the tomato variety impacts the fungal and bacterial stem endophytes. Furthermore, these findings suggest the potential benefits of using of traditional genotypes as a source of novel beneficial microbiota that may prove highly valuable in unpredicted challenges and the advancement in sustainable agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Liu-Xu
- Biochemistry and Biotechnology Group, Department of Biology, Biochemistry and Natural Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Liang Ma
- The Key Laboratory for Quality Improvement of Agricultural Products of Zhejiang Province, College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Atefeh Farvardin
- Biochemistry and Biotechnology Group, Department of Biology, Biochemistry and Natural Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Agustín
- Biochemistry and Biotechnology Group, Department of Biology, Biochemistry and Natural Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Eugenio Llorens
- Biochemistry and Biotechnology Group, Department of Biology, Biochemistry and Natural Sciences, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jeyaseelan A, Murugesan K, Thayanithi S, Palanisamy SB. A review of the impact of herbicides and insecticides on the microbial communities. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2024; 245:118020. [PMID: 38151149 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Enhancing crop yield to accommodate the ever-increasing world population has become critical, and diminishing arable land has pressured current agricultural practices. Intensive farming methods have been using more pesticides and insecticides (biocides), culminating in soil deposition, negatively impacting the microbiome. Hence, a deeper understanding of the interaction and impact of pesticides and insecticides on microbial communities is required for the scientific community. This review highlights the recent findings concerning the possible impacts of biocides on various soil microorganisms and their diversity. This review's bibliometric analysis emphasised the recent developments' statistics based on the Scopus document search. Pesticides and insecticides are reported to degrade microbes' structure, cellular processes, and distinct biochemical reactions at cellular and biochemical levels. Several biocides disrupt the relationship between plants and their microbial symbionts, hindering beneficial biological activities that are widely discussed. Most microbial target sites of or receptors are biomolecules, and biocides bind with the receptor through a ligand-based mechanism. The biomarker action mechanism in response to biocides relies on activating the receptor site by specific biochemical interactions. The production of electrophilic or nucleophilic species, free radicals, and redox-reactive agents are the significant factors of biocide's metabolic reaction. Most studies considered for the review reported the negative impact of biocides on the soil microbial community; hence, technological development is required regarding eco-friendly pesticide and insecticide, which has less or no impact on the soil microbial community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aravind Jeyaseelan
- Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kamaraj Murugesan
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Humanities, SRM Institute of Science and Technology-Ramapuram, Chennai, 600089, Tamil Nadu, India; Life Science Division, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia.
| | - Saranya Thayanithi
- Department of Biotechnology, Rathinam Technical Campus, Coimbatore, 641021, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Suresh Babu Palanisamy
- Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prado C, Pereira R, Durrant L, Júnior R, Piubeli F, Bonfá M. Fipronil Degradation in Soil by Enterobacter chengduensis Strain G2.8: Metabolic Perspective. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1935. [PMID: 37763338 PMCID: PMC10532730 DOI: 10.3390/life13091935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Fipronil is an insecticide widely used in the agricultural and veterinary sectors for its efficacy in pest control. The presence of fipronil in the environment is mainly due to agricultural and domestic practices and is frequently found in different types of environmental matrices in concentrations ranging from µg/L to mg/L and can be hazardous to non-target organisms due to its high toxicity. This study was carried out to obtain and characterize microorganisms from soil which are capable of biodegrading fipronil that could be of great biotechnological interest. For this purpose, bioprospecting was carried out using fipronil (0.6 g/L) as the main source of carbon and nitrogen for growth. Once obtained, the strain was identified by sequencing the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene and the capacity to degrade fipronil was monitored by GC-MS. Our study showed a presence in soil samples of the strain identified as Enterobacter chengduensis, which was able to metabolize fipronil and its metabolites during the mineralization process. Enterobacter chengduensis was able to biodegrade fipronil (96%) and its metabolites fipronil-sulfone (92%) and fipronil-sulfide (79%) in 14 days. Overall, the results of this study provided a bacterium with great potential that could contribute to the degradation of fipronil in the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caio Prado
- Engineering School of Lorena, University of São Paulo, Lorena 12602-810, Brazil;
| | - Rodrigo Pereira
- Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados 79825-070, Brazil;
| | | | - Rômulo Júnior
- Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste, Dourados 79804-970, Brazil;
| | | | - Maricy Bonfá
- Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados 79825-070, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|