Provider Perspectives on and Access to Palliative Care for Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease

Palliative care education as an integrated component of pulmonary rehabilitation: A real-world mixed-methods feasibility study

AIM

To explore the feasibility of integrating palliative care education in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).

METHODS

A mixed-methods feasibility study was conducted in people with chronic respiratory diseases enrolled in 12-weeks outpatient hospital-based PR. A session about palliative care was integrated in the education content. Feasibility was assessed by attendance to the palliative care session, feasibility and acceptability of outcome assessment, acceptability of the intervention and undesirable effects. After PR, two focus groups were carried out. Descriptive and inductive thematic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Out of 44 individuals referred to PR, 14 were excluded, six declined to participate and two were referred to another rehabilitation programme. Twenty-two people with chronic respiratory diseases started PR, however, six had discontinued the programme at the time of the palliative care session. Attendance to this session was 81 % (n = 13/16; 11 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 1 severe asthma and 1 interstitial lung disease; 77 % men, 65 ± 9 years-old, FEV1 41 ± 21 % of predicted). Outcome assessment was completed in 77 % (n = 10/13) of participants and lasted approximately 90 minutes. Three themes were identified from the focus groups: daily living with a chronic respiratory disease, meaningful care and demystifying misconceptions. Participants found the intervention and outcome assessment acceptable. An improvement in knowledge and change of attitude towards palliative care was considered a major effect of the palliative care session. No undesirable effects were reported.

DISCUSSION

Integrating an education session about palliative care in PR is feasible, meaningful for people with chronic respiratory diseases, and has no undesirable effects. A randomised controlled study is being prepared to strengthen these results.

Palliative care in advanced pulmonary fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Updated clinical practice guidelines for pulmonary fibrosis recommend early integrated palliative care using a primary palliative approach. Clinicians need to be aware of the various palliative interventions in order to implement guidelines' recommendations. This review provides an update on evidence-based palliative therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Literature review indicates early integration of palliative care in pulmonary fibrosis is feasible and meets patient needs. Key components of a primary palliative approach include comprehensive symptoms and needs screening, systematic symptom management using nonpharmacologic interventions, supplemental oxygen and opioids for dyspnea and cough. Patient-centered communication is essential for successful integration of palliative care. Early, iterative advance care planning in clinic to understand patient goals, values and preferences for current and future care, improves patient care and satisfaction. Prioritizing caregiver inclusion in clinics can address their needs. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary allied team facilitates integration of palliative care and supports patients throughout the disease course. Different models of palliative care delivery exist and can be adapted for local use. The use of artificial intelligence algorithms and tools may improve care and continuity.

SUMMARY

Clinicians must develop competency in palliative care. Organizational and policy support is essential to enable seamless integration of palliative care throughout the care continuum.

Pulmonologists' Perspectives on and Access to Palliative Care for Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in South Carolina

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a serious illness with an unpredictable disease course and survival rates comparable with some cancers. Patients with IPF suffer considerable symptom burden, declining quality of life, and high health care resource utilization. Patients and caregivers report many unmet needs, including a desire for more education regarding diagnosis and assistance with navigating disease trajectory. Compelling evidence suggests that palliative care (PC) provides an extra layer of support for patients with serious illness.

Research Question

The purpose of this survey was to gain perspectives regarding PC for patients with IPF by board-certified pulmonologists in South Carolina (SC).

Study Design and Methods

A 24-item survey was adapted (with permission) from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation PC Survey instrument. Data were analyzed and results are presented.

Results

Pulmonologists (n = 32, 44%) completed the survey; 97% practice in urbanized settings. The majority agreed that PC and hospice do not provide the same service. There were varying views about comfort in discussing prognosis, disease trajectory, and addressing advance directives. Options for ambulatory and inpatient PC are limited and early PC referral does not occur. None reported initiating a PC referral at time of initial IPF diagnosis.

Interpretation

Pulmonologists in SC who participated in this survey are aware of the principles of PC in providing comprehensive care to patients with IPF and have limited options for PC referral. PC educational materials provided early in the diagnosis can help facilitate and guide end-of-life planning and discussions. Minimal resources exist for patients in underserved communities.

European Respiratory Society clinical practice guideline: palliative care for people with COPD or interstitial lung disease

There is increased awareness of palliative care needs in people with COPD or interstitial lung disease (ILD). This European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force aimed to provide recommendations for initiation and integration of palliative care into the respiratory care of adult people with COPD or ILD. The ERS task force consisted of 20 members, including representatives of people with COPD or ILD and informal caregivers. Eight questions were formulated, four in the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format. These were addressed with full systematic reviews and application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for assessing the evidence. Four additional questions were addressed narratively. An "evidence-to-decision" framework was used to formulate recommendations. The following definition of palliative care for people with COPD or ILD was agreed. A holistic and multidisciplinary person-centred approach aiming to control symptoms and improve quality of life of people with serious health-related suffering because of COPD or ILD, and to support their informal caregivers. Recommendations were made regarding people with COPD or ILD and their informal caregivers: to consider palliative care when physical, psychological, social or existential needs are identified through holistic needs assessment; to offer palliative care interventions, including support for informal caregivers, in accordance with such needs; to offer advance care planning in accordance with preferences; and to integrate palliative care into routine COPD and ILD care. Recommendations should be reconsidered as new evidence becomes available.

Palliative care for interstitial lung disease: A nationwide survey of pulmonary specialists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is progressive with high symptom burdens and poor prognosis. Patients with ILD need optimal palliative care to maintain their quality of life, however, few nationwide surveys have addressed palliative care for ILD.

METHODS

A nationwide, self-administered questionnaire was conducted. Questionnaires were sent by mail to pulmonary specialists certified by the Japanese Respiratory Society (n = 3423). The current practices of PC for ILD, end-of-life communication, referral to a PC team, barriers to PC for ILD, and comparison of PC between ILD and lung cancer (LC).

RESULTS

1332 (38.9%) participants completed the questionnaire, and the data of 1023 participants who had cared for ILD patients in the last year were analysed. Most participants reported that ILD patients often or always complained of dyspnoea and cough, but only 25% had referred them to a PC team. The timing of end-of-life communication tended to be later than the physician-perceived ideal timing. The participants experienced significantly greater difficulty in symptomatic relief and decision-making in PC for ILD compared to LC. Prescription of opioids for dyspnoea was less frequent for ILD than for LC. ILD-specific barriers in PC included an 'inability to predict prognosis', 'lack of established treatments for dyspnoea', 'shortage of psychological and social support', and 'difficulty for patients/families to accept the disease's poor prognosis'.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary specialists experienced more difficulty in providing PC for ILD compared to LC and reported considerable ILD-specific barriers in PC. Multifaceted clinical studies are needed to develop optimal PC for ILD.

Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease in the intensive care unit: Principles of diagnostic evaluation and management

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is typically managed on an outpatient basis. Critical care physicians manage patients with ILD in the setting of an acute exacerbation (ILD flare) causing severe hypoxia. The principles of management of acute exacerbation of ILD are different from those used to manage patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome from sepsis, etc. Selected patients may be candidates for aggressive measures like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and lung transplantation, while almost all patients will benefit from early palliative care. This review focused on the types of ILD, diagnosis, and management pathways for this challenging condition.

Specialist Palliative Care Consultation for Patients with Nonmalignant Pulmonary Diseases: A Retrospective Study

Background

Few patients with chronic nonmalignant pulmonary diseases receive specialist palliative care consultation, despite their high symptom burden in end of life.

Objectives

To study palliative care decision making, survival, and hospital resource usage in patients with nonmalignant pulmonary diseases with or without a specialist palliative care consultation.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all patients with a chronic nonmalignant pulmonary disease and a palliative care decision (palliative goal of therapy), who were treated in Tampere University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020.

Results

A total of 107 patients were included in the study, 62 (58%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 43 (40%) interstitial lung disease (ILD). Median survival after palliative care decision was shorter in patients with ILD than in patients with COPD (59 vs. 213 days, p = 0.004). Involvement of a palliative care specialist in the decision making was not associated with the survival. Patients with COPD who received palliative care consultation visited less often emergency room (73% vs. 100%, p = 0.019) and spent fewer days in the hospital (7 vs. 18 days, p = 0.007) during the last year of life. When a palliative care specialist attended the decision making, the presence and opinions of the patients were recorded more often, and the patients were more frequently referred to a palliative care pathway.

Conclusions

Specialist palliative care consultation seems to enable better end-of-life care and supports shared decision making for patients with nonmalignant pulmonary diseases. Therefore, palliative care consultations should be utilized in nonmalignant pulmonary diseases preferably before the last days of life.