Liquid chromatographic–mass spectrometric assay for simultaneous pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine determination in human plasma samples

Determination of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine in microvolume human plasma using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandam mass spectrometry

To support the pharmacokinetic study of sulfadoxine (SD) and pyrimethamine (PM) in pregnant women and children, sensitive methods with small sample volume are desirable. Here we report a method to determine SD and PM with microvolume plasma samples: 5 µL plasma samples were cleaned up by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The deuterated analytes were used as the internal standards. The samples after cleanup were injected onto an ACE Excel SuperC18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Hichrom Limited) connected to a Waters I class UPLC coupled with a Sciex Triple Quad 6500+ Mass Spectrometer and eluted with water and acetonitrile both containing 0.1% formic acid in a gradient mode at 0.8mL/min. Detection utilized ESI+ as the ion source and MRM as the quantification mode. The precursor-to-product ion transitions m/z 311→245 for SD and 249→233 for PM were selected for quantification. The ion transitions for the corresponding internal standards were 315→249 for SD-d4 and 254→235 for PM-d3. The simplest linear regression weighted by 1/x was used for the calibration curves. The calibration ranges were 1-200 µg/mL SD and 2 - 1000ng/mL PM. The mean (± standard deviation) recoveries were 94.3±3.2% (SD) and 97.0±1.5% (PM). The validated method was applied to analysis of 1719 clinical samples, demonstrating the method is suitable for the pharmacokinetic study with samples collected up to day 28 post-dose.

LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous analysis of seven antimalarials and two active metabolites in dried blood spots for applications in field trials: Analytical and clinical validation

In epidemiological studies, antimalarials measurements in blood represent the best available marker of drugs exposure at population level, an important driver for the emergence of drug resistance. We have developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of 7 frequently used antimalarials (amodiaquine, chloroquine, quinine, sulfadoxine, pyrimethamine, mefloquine, lumefantrine) and 2 active metabolites (N-desethyl-amodiaquine, desbutyl-lumefantrine) in 10-μl dried blood spots (DBS). This sampling approach is suitable for field studies wherein blood samples processing, transportation and storage are problematic. Sample preparation included extraction from a 3 mm-disk punched out of the DBS with 100-μl of methanol + 1% formic acid containing deuterated internal standards for all drugs. Good performances were achieved in terms of trueness (-12.1 to +11.1%), precision (1.4-15.0%) and sensitivity, with lower limits of quantification comprised between 2 ng/ml (sulfadoxine) and 20 ng/ml (chloroquine, quinine, pyrimethamine, mefloquine, lumefantrine and desbutyl-lumefantrine). All analytes were stable in DBS kept for 24 h at room temperature and at 37 °C. The developed assay was applied within the frame of a pharmacokinetic study including 16 healthy volunteers who received a single dose of artemether-lumefantrine. Lumefantrine concentrations in plasma and in DBS were highly correlated (R = 0.97) at all time points, confirming the assumption that lumefantrine concentrations determined in DBS confidently reflect blood concentrations. The blood/plasma ratio of 0.56 obtained using the Bland-Altman approach (and corresponding to the slope of the linear regression) is in line with very low penetration of lumefantrine into red blood cells. This sensitive multiplex LC-MS/MS assay enabling the simultaneous analysis of antimalarials in DBS is suitable for epidemiological studies in field conditions.

Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of two sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine fixed-dose combination tablets: a parallel-design study in healthy Chinese male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet is the long-acting portion of the antimalaria product Artecospe(®), coblister containing artesunate tablets plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablets. This study was conducted to support the efficacy and tolerability of the sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablet in the World Health Organization's (WHO) Prequalification of Medicines Programme, as well as to obtain marketing authorization in China.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles between a new generic and the branded reference formulation of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC tablets, and to assess the bioequivalence of the 2 products in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

This single-dose, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single 1500/75-mg dose (3 × 500/25-mg tablets) of either the test or reference formulation after a 12-hour overnight fast. Seventeen blood samples were obtained over a 168-hour interval, and plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine were determined by 2 separate validated liquid chromatography-isotopic dilution mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic properties (C(max), AUC(0-72), AUC(0-168), and T(max)) were calculated and analyzed statistically. The 2 formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratios of C(max) and AUC(0-72) were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%, in accordance with the guidelines of WHO and China's Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Tolerability was evaluated throughout the study by vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead ECGs, and subject interviews on adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Forty-six healthy subjects completed the study. The mean values of sulfadoxine C(max) (183.07 and 165.15 mg/L), AUC(0-72) (11,036.52 and 10,536.78 mg/L/h), and AUC(0-168) (22,247.05 and 21,761.02 mg/L/h) were not significantly different between the test and reference formulations, respectively. The same was true for pyrimethamine (0.55 and 0.58 mg/L, 29.85 and 31.44 mg/L/h, and 56.18 and 59.27 mg/L/h, respectively). The 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratios of C(max), AUC(0-72), and AUC(0-168) of both sulfadoxine (105.4%-116.6%, 99.3%-110.6%, and 96.4%-108.1%) and pyrimethamine (88.8%-100.9%, 89.5%-101.0%, and 88.3%-101.6%) were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. A total of 7 mild AEs were reported in 7 subjects (15.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this single-dose (1500/75-mg) study suggest that the test and reference formulations of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine FDC 500/25-mg tablet have similar pharmacokinetic profiles both in terms of rate and extent of absorption. The formulations met WHO's and China's FDA regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting conditions. Both formulations were generally well-tolerated.

Solid-phase extraction for multiresidue determination of sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and pyrimethamine in Bovine's milk

This paper describes a systematic approach to the development of a solid-phase extraction method for simultaneous extraction of 10 antibiotic residues in bovine milk, belonging to groups of sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and pyrimethamine. The sample preparation steps include acidic deproteinization of milk proteins followed by sample enrichment and cleanup using a polymer-based Oasis HLB solid-phase extraction cartridge. The analyses were carried out by using a method based on liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry with positive ion mode. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency such as sample loading pH, SPE wash solvent composition, and eluting solution pH were carefully investigated and optimized. The developed solid-phase extraction procedure coupled to multiresidue liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry method was applied for the analysis of 10 antibiotic residues in milk samples, and it proved to be simple, sensitive, and selective providing a recovery ranging from 70 to 106%.

Validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry multi-residue method for the simultaneous determination of sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and pyrimethamine in milk

A multiresidue method suitable for confirmation and determination of six sulfonamides (SAs), three tetracyclines (TCs), and pyrimethamine (PYR) in cow milk was validated. Milk samples were extracted using copolymer Oasis HLB solid-phase extraction (SPE) and analyzed by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry with positive ion mode. Estimated method detection limits (MDL) and method quantitation limits (MQL) ranged from 0.48 to 2.64 and 0.61 to 8.64ng/mL, respectively. These values are far lower than the maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by several control authorities. Excellent linear dynamic range was observed from the method quantitation limits to 300ng/mL with correlation coefficients better than 0.9900 for all compounds. The method was accurate with recoveries ranging from 72.01 to 97.39%. Good intra-precision and intermediate precision were obtained with RSD better than 11.08%. The method is fairly robust with sample pH being the only critical control point.

Simultaneous quantitative analysis of the antimalarials pyrimethamine and sulfamethoxypyrazine in plasma samples using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

The work presented here deals with the development of a quantitative tool for the simultaneous determination of sulfamethoxypyrazine (sulfalene)/pyrimethamine in plasma. The chromatography used only takes 12.5 min, allowing a fast sample turnover time. Relative standard deviation of retention times was never above 3.48% (n = 66). Adequate sample clean-up was achieved by a simple and relatively fast liquid/liquid extraction. In this way, ionisation suppression effects, typical for more simple sample clean-up procedures, could be avoided resulting in absolute plasma effects of maximum -17.1% for sulfalene, -16.1 for the internal standard (IS), and 12% for pyrimethamine. For both pyrimethamine and sulfalene, quadratic calibration curves from 0.00101 to 0.807 microg/mL for pyrimethamine and from 0.271 to 216 microg/mL for sulfalene gave the best fit. Mean coefficients of determination (R2) were 0.9951 (n = 6, CV% 0.39) for pyrimethamine and 0.9942 (n = 6, CV% 0.13) for sulfalene. Precision was below 9.35% for pyrimethamine and 13.9% for sulfalene. Inaccuracy remained below 15% at all cases. The optimised method was used for a time-course study of the sulfalene/pyrimethamine combination concentration in plasma of patients treated with Co-Arinate, a new curative antimalaria-medicine.