Cooperative Study of the Spanish Pancreas Transplant Group (GETP): Surgical Complications

Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation have improved in recent decades, but data are mainly derived from registries or prospective single-centre studies. This large epidemiological study was undertaken to investigate the impact of clinical and demographic factors on graft and patient survival in pancreas transplant recipients in Spain, and to provide robust, country-wide, practice-based data to complement registry findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological study to assess risk factors impacting patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients in eight centres in Spain. All patients transplanted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 were included; data were collected until 31 December 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for all time-to-event analyses, including patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, and BPAR. For graft survival analysis, in cases of death with functioning graft, patients were censored without any event on the date of death. For acute rejection and BPAR, patients were censored without any event on the date of death or graft loss. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were conducted to assess the association between baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and patient/graft survival.

RESULTS

Data were included for 241 (80.1%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, 56 (18.6%) pancreas-after-kidney transplants and 4 (1.3%) pancreas transplants alone. Mean±standard deviation time from diagnosis until transplantation was 26.1±7.5 years. Nineteen patients died, mainly due to infections (n=10); the remaining 282 patients (93.7%) survived from transplantation until the end of the study. Among 55 patients (18.3%) with pancreas graft loss, the main reasons were vascular thrombosis (n=19), chronic rejection (n=10), acute rejection (n=6) and death with a functioning graft (n=5). The overall rate of vascular-related death was 1.3% at 5 years post transplant. Univariable analysis showed that patient age and weight, donor age, previous kidney transplantation, previous cardiovascular events and need for insulin more than 48h post transplantation were significantly associated with pancreas graft survival. Of these, in multivariable analyses pancreas graft survival was inferior in patients who had received a previous kidney transplant prior to pancreas transplantation (log-rank test, p=0.0002). Glucose metabolism, renal function and cardiovascular risk factors were generally stable following transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this multicentre study highlight the excellent patient and graft outcomes following pancreas transplantation, with a notably low incidence of cardiovascular events.

Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented.

METHODS

Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4 ± 5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1 ± 3.4 kg/m², mean duration of diabetes 25.5 ± 6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91.3%, 91.3% and 89.5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2% and 93.6% at one year, 88.2% and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3% and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P = 1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2%, 69.1% and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5% and 80.6% at one year, 64.7% and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P = .0109). Post-transplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In 13 years' experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.

Exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation: Complications and management

The aim of this minireview is to compare various pancreas transplantation exocrine drainage techniques i.e., bladder vs enteric. Both techniques have different difficulties and complications. Numerous comparisons have been made in the literature between exocrine drainage techniques throughout the history of pancreas transplantation, detailing complications and their impact on graft and patient survival. Specific emphasis has been made on the early postoperative management of these complications and the related surgical infections and their consequences. In light of the results, a number of bladder-drained pancreas grafts required conversion to enteric drainage. As a result of technical improvements, outcomes of the varied enteric exocrine drainage techniques (duodenojejunostomy, duodenoduodenostomy or gastric drainage) have also been discussed i.e., assessing specific risks vs benefits. Pancreatic exocrine secretions can be drained to the urinary or intestinal tracts. Until the late 1990s the bladder drainage technique was used in the majority of transplant centers due to ease of monitoring urine amylase and lipase levels for evaluation of possible rejection. Moreover, bladder drainage was associated at that time with fewer surgical complications, which in contrast to enteric drainage, could be managed with conservative therapies. Nowadays, the most commonly used technique for proper driving of exocrine pancreatic secretions is enteric drainage due to the high rate of urological and metabolic complications associated with bladder drainage. Of note, 10% to 40% of bladder-drained pancreata eventually required enteric conversion at no detriment to overall graft survival. Various surgical techniques were originally described using the small bowel for enteric anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop or a direct side-to-side anastomosis. Despite the improvements in surgery, enteric drainage complication rates ranging from 2%-20% have been reported. Treatment depends on the presence of any associated complications and the condition of the patient. Intra-abdominal infection represents a potentially very serious problem. Up to 30% of deep wound infections are associated with an anastomotic leak. They can lead not only to high rates of graft loss, but also to substantial mortality. New modifications of established techniques are being developed, such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option, in which the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main concern of this technique is the challenge of repairing the native duodenum when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary. Identification and prevention of technical failure remains the main objective for pancreas transplantation surgeons. In conclusion, despite numerous techniques to minimize exocrine pancreatic drainage complications e.g., leakage and infection, no universal technique has been standardized. A prospective study/registry analysis may resolve this.

Immediate post-operative complications (I): Post-operative bleeding; vascular origin: Thrombosis pancreatitis

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for insulin-dependent diabetes that associates end-stage diabetic nephropathy, since it achieves not only a clear improvement in the quality of life, but also provides a long-term survival advantage over isolated kidney transplant. However, pancreas transplantation still has the highest rate of surgical complications among organ transplants. More than 70% of early graft losses are attributed to technical failures, that is, to a non-immunological cause. The so-called technical failures include graft thrombosis, bleeding, infection, pancreatitis, anastomotic leak and pancreatic fistula. Pancreatic graft thrombosis leads these technical complications as the most frequent cause of early graft loss. Currently most recipients receive postoperative anticoagulation with the aim of reducing the rate of thrombosis. Hemoperitoneum in the early postoperative period is a frequent cause of relaparotomy, but it is not usually associated with graft loss. The incidence of hemoperitoneum is clearly related to the use of anticoagulation in the postoperative period. Post-transplant pancreatitis is another cause of early postoperative complications, less frequent than the previous. In this review, we analyze the most common surgical complications that determine pancreatic graft losses.

Results after 13 years of kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients in Comunidad Valenciana

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant is a proven option of treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and related end-stage renal disease, who are candidates for kidney transplantation. The results from the beginning of SPK transplant program in Comunidad Valenciana are presented.

METHODS

Descriptive, retrospective, and single-center study of the pancreas transplant performed at the Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, from September 2002 to December 2015. Clinical variables from donors and recipients, peri-operative variables, patient survival, and pancreatic graft survival were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (48 males and 33 females, mean age 37.4±5.7 years, mean BMI 24.1±3.4kg/m2, mean duration of diabetes 25.5±6.5 years) received SPK transplantation. The overall patient survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 91,3, 91,3 and 89,5%, respectively. However, patient survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 88.2 and 93.6% at one year, 88.2 and 93.7% at 3 years, and 85.3 and 93.7% at 5 years, respectively (P=1). The overall pancreatic graft survival at one, 3, and 5 years were 75.2, 69.1 and 63.2%, respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic graft survival in the periods 2002-2008 and 2009-2015 were 67.5 and 80.6% at one year, 64.7 and 71.8% at 3 years, and 58.8% and 65.3% at 5 years, respectively (P=.0109). Postransplant complications were: graft rejection 8.6%, venous graft thrombosis 7.4%, graft pancreatitis 4.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In 13-year's experience of SPK transplantation, patient and pancreatic graft survival and the rate of complications after pancreas transplantation were similar to those of other larger series. The medical-surgical team experience improves pancreatic graft survival without influencing patient survival.

Early intestinal complications following pancreas transplantation: lessons learned from over 300 cases - a retrospective single-center study

Enteric complications remain a major cause of morbidity in the post-transplant period of pancreas transplantation despite improvements surgical technique. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze retrospectively the early intestinal complications and their potential relation with vascular events. From 2000 to 2016, 337 pancreas transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage. For exocrine secretion, intestinal drainage was done with hand-sewn anastomosis duodenojejunostomy. Twenty-three patients (6.8%) had early intestinal complications. Median age was 39 years (male: 65.2%). Median cold ischemia time was 11 h [IQR: 9-12.4]. Intestinal complications were intestinal obstruction (n = 7); paralytic ileus (n = 5); intestinal fistula without anastomotic dehiscence (n = 3); ischemic graft duodenum (n = 3); dehiscence of duodenojejunostomy (n = 4); and anastomotic dehiscence in jejunum after pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1). Eighteen cases required relaparotomy: adhesiolysis (n = 6); repeated laparotomy without findings (n = 1); transplantectomy (n = 6); primary leak closure (n = 3); re-positioning of the graft (n = 1); and intestinal resection (n = 1). Of the intestinal complications, 4 were associated with vascular thrombosis, resulting in two pancreatic graft losses. Enteric drainage with duodenum-jejunum anastomosis is safe and feasible, with a low rate of intra-abdominal complications. Vascular thrombosis associated with intestinal complications presents a risk factor for the viability of pancreatic grafts, so prevention and early detection is vital.

Pancreas transplantation with isolated splenic artery blood supply - Single center experience

BACKGROUND

The blood supply of the native pancreas by three arterial lines from the celiac trunk system (splenic artery and common hepatic artery) and the superior mesenteric artery forces surgeons to perform vascular reconstruction to provide sufficient intra-organ blood flow into the graft. The purpose of our study was to assess the possibility of pancreas transplantation with an isolated splenic artery blood supply.

METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2018, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) was performed in 21 patients. Gender: male - 11 (52,4%), female 10 (47,6%). Recipients aged 26 to 54, the median age was 38 [34; 42] years. In 6 (28,6%) recipients, the organ perfusion was carried out through the splenic artery alone; in the rest, it was performed through the splenic and inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery exiting from the superior mesenteric artery of the graft. The transplant function, the quality of carbohydrate metabolism compensation, the objective characteristics of intra-organ blood flow was assessed.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the volume blood flow characteristics revealed by CT-perfusion and laboratory data in the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the assessment of the function and quality of blood supply to the transplant, the possibility of performing pancreas transplantation with an isolated splenic artery blood supply had been proved.

[Pancreas transplantation with isolated blood supply through the splenic artery]

In multiple organ procurement, taking into consideration certain peculiarities of the vascular architectonics of the celiac trunk or an iatrogenic injury to the superior mesenteric artery, it is impossible to perform standard arterial reconstruction of a pancreas transplant with the use of a Y-shaped vascular allograft. This results in refusal from transplanting a potentially suitable organ. The purpose of our study was to assess the possibility of transplantation of the pancreatoduodenal complex with isolated blood supply via the splenic artery. Between January 2008 and November 2016, transplantation of the pancreas was carried out in a total of 20 patients (9 men and 11 women aged from 26 to 40 years, mean age 37.2±5.6 years). Depending on the number of the major arteries supplying the pancreas, the patients were divided into 2 groups. No statistically significant between-group differences in the parameters of volumetric blood flow determined by means of CT perfusion, in the majority of laboratory findings or therapeutic outcomes were revealed. Based on assessment of the function and quality of pancreatic blood supply, we proved feasibility of transplantation of the pancreatoduodenal complex with isolated blood supply through the splenic artery.

[Pancreas transplantation followed by stumpless duodenal exocrine drainage]

Pancreas transplantation followed by stumpless duodenal exocrine drainage was performed in 2 patients. Primary kidney and pancreas graft function was noted in both cases. Two procedures of pancreas transplantation followed by stumpless duodenal exocrine drainage were carried out for the first time. Perhaps, absent donor duodenal stump has several advantages for the further course of postoperative period that may be confirmed in prospective trials.

Retroperitoneal Pancreas Transplantation With the Use of Duodenal Drainage via "Button Technique": First Clinical Practice (Case Report)

The persistent relative high incidence of duodenum-associated surgical complications significantly reduces pancreas grafts' (PG) and recipients' survival rates. A 31-year-old female patient underwent retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with the use of PG exocrine drainage into the recipient's duodenum via the "button technique" approach. An uncomplicated postoperative period with satisfactory function of both transplants (pancreas and kidney) was noted. This was the 1st time ever that the transplantation was performed with the use of retroperitoneal placement of the pancreas transplant and duodenal drainage via the "button technique" approach. It is possible that the absence of the duodenal stump in the donor's transplant has a number of benefits in the postoperative period, which can be confirmed during the follow-up observations.

Techniques of pancreas graft salvage/indications for allograft pancreatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite improvements in pancreas allograft outcome, graft complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This review analyses the issues involved in the management of conditions that may require graft pancreatectomy, including the indications and techniques for graft salvage.

RECENT FINDINGS

With early recognition of graft complications, liberal use of radiological interventions, improved infection control, access to critical care and innovative surgical techniques, graft salvage is now feasible in many circumstances where graft pancreatectomy would previously have been necessary.

SUMMARY

The outcome of pancreas transplantation continues to improve with advances in the management of graft-threatening complications.

Pancreas transplantation: 50 years of experience

In December 1966, the first pancreas transplant ever was performed at the University of Minnesota. R. Lillehei and W. Kelly, transplanted a kidney and a pancreas in a diabetic patient on dialysis, getting function of both organs. Since then, the technical and immunological advances in this transplant have resulted in graft and patient survival results as the rest of the abdominal solid organ transplants. The balance of these 50 years is that more than 50,000 diabetic patients have been transplanted in more than 200 centers around the world. In our country the first transplant was performed 34 years ago in Barcelona and now 12 centers perform about 100 transplants per year. Although advances in diabetes control have been very important, pancreas transplantation continues to be the only method that allows normalization of the carbohydrates metabolism to improve the quality of life and, above all, to increase the survival of these patients.