Buttress plate fixation of coronoid process fractures via a medial approach

Outcomes and challenges in the surgical treatment of trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations: A case series study

INTRODUCTION

Transolecranon fracture-dislocations represent a complex subset of elbow injuries characterized by concomitant fractures of the olecranon, coronoid process, and radial head, often associated with posterior dislocation. These injuries pose significant surgical challenges due to their inherent instability and high risk of poor functional outcomes. Despite previous studies describing different fixation techniques, there is no standardized surgical protocol to optimize outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional results of a structured surgical approach in the management of these injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was conducted, analyzing 12 patients with transolecranon fracture-dislocations treated at two orthopedic centers. Patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a standardized fixation sequence through the Wrightington posterolateral approach, with selective use of the anteromedial approach when necessary. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographic follow-up included evaluation of bone healing, joint congruence, and post-traumatic arthritis. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA to assess functional improvement over time.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 24 months, significant improvement in functional scores was observed. MEPS increased from 63 at two months to 90 at 24 months, while DASH scores decreased from 45 to 15, and OES improved from 28 to 46 over the same period. Range of motion showed progressive recovery, with mean flexion-extension reaching 160° of flexion and full extension at final follow-up. All fractures achieved radiographic consolidation, with no cases of implant failure. Despite evident clinical improvement, statistical significance was not achieved in ANOVA analysis (p > 0.05), likely due to sample size limitations.

CONCLUSION

A standardized surgical approach combining structured fixation strategies and early rehabilitation provides favorable clinical and functional outcomes in transolecranon fracture-dislocations. The results of this study reinforce the importance of anatomical reduction and stable fixation in restoring elbow function. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further validate these findings and refine treatment protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Challenge of Trans-Ulnar Basal Coronoid Fracture-Dislocations: A Surgical Strategy Based on the Pattern of Coronoid Fracture

Backgroud

The rarity and complexity of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations pose significant challenges in treatment. This study aimed to categorize these fractures based on coronoid fracture patterns and propose tailored surgical approaches for each type. Additionally, we evaluated the functional and radiological outcomes among the patients managed using our treatment algorithm.

Methods

A total of 19 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations between March 2018 and October 2022 were enrolled in this study. These patients were classified based on the coronoid fracture patterns associated with olecranon fractures: type 1 involved anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures, type 2 encompassed coronoid base and body fractures, and type 3 involved a combination of types 1 and 2. We made a midline longitudinal dorsal incision to facilitate the provisional fixation of the olecranon fragment to the distal metaphysis using a locking plate. Subsequently, we employed the over-the-top (type 1) and Taylor-Scham (type 3) approaches for direct coronoid process fixation with buttress plating. Type 2 fractures were approached via medial fascial exposure from the posterior ulnar cortex or through the olecranon fractures, and subsequently fixed with miniplates and screws. Bony union and joint articulation were assessed via plain radiographs, and functional outcomes were evaluated using range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

Results

Among the 19 patients, 3 had type 1 fractures, 14 had type 2 fractures, and 2 had type 3 fractures. All fractures exhibited solid osseous union without subluxation or dislocation. The average flexion and extension arc was 119.47° ± 20.88°, with a mean flexion of 127.37° ± 13.37° and an average flexion contracture of 7.89° ± 10.04°. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 82.63 ± 12.51 points. Qualitatively, patient outcomes were excellent in 5 patients, good in 9, and fair in 5.

Conclusions

Most of our patients presented with easily approachable coronoid base and body fractures. However, in AMF fractures of the coronoid process, a direct medial approach is required for buttress plating. We believe our study helps provide useful guidelines for making appropriate decisions in trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations.

Surgical Treatment of Coronoid Fracture With Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability: An Instructional Review

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow is one of the complex elbow instability. The primary sites of injury encompass fractures of the anteromedial coronoid process and injuries to the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow. Some patients may present with involvement of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow. Owing to its distinctive injury mechanism and imaging characteristics, this condition is infrequent in clinical practice and susceptible to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Literature reviews indicate that conservative management of VPMRI is associated with numerous complications, such as persistent pain, traumatic arthritis, and chronic elbow instability. Consequently, surgical intervention has emerged as the recommended treatment modality. Nonetheless, the lack of systematic research on VPMRI in clinical practice has been inconclusive regarding the optimal internal fixation techniques and surgical approaches. Therefore, investigating the treatment modalities, surgical techniques, and internal fixation strategies for VPMRI associated with coronoid fractures holds substantial importance for informing clinical management. In this review, we systematically synthesize the existing literature on coronoid fractures with VPMRI for offering a valuable reference for future clinical treatment.

Treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow by olecranon osteotomy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study aims to evaluate the surgical techniques and outcomes of treating elbow dislocations with coronoid and radial head fractures, commonly referred to as the terrible triad of the elbow (TTE), through a single olecranon osteotomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 73 patients diagnosed with TTE between January 2015 and April 2022. The cohort included 44 men and 29 women, with an average age of 40.0 ± 15.1 years (range, 18-68 years). Among these patients, Mason Type I, II, and III fractures were identified in 11, 42, and 20 cases, respectively, while Morrey Type I, II, and III fractures were observed in 45, 23, and five cases, respectively. All patients underwent treatment via a single olecranon osteotomy. The average interval between injury and surgery was 5.6 ± 1.6 days (range, 3-8 days). Elbow function was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), pain was measured via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and quality of life was evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire.

Results

Patients were followed for 15 to 60 months (mean, 37.1 ± 13.3 months). All coronoid and radial head fractures achieved complete healing, with an average recovery time of 4.3 ± 1.1 months (range, 3-6 months). By the final follow-up, all patients had regained normal elbow function. The mean elbow flexion was 124.4° ± 9.2°, extension was 9.6° ± 6.5°, and the total range of flexion-extension was 114.8° ± 11.7°. Forearm pronation averaged 77.3° ± 4.8°, supination 79.2° ± 6.5°, and total forearm rotation 156.5° ± 8.4°. The mean MEPS was 89.3 ± 6.4, with 36 patients achieving excellent scores and 37 obtaining good scores. Preoperative VAS scores averaged 8.78 ± 1.11, which significantly dropped to 0.97 ± 0.83 at the final follow-up (p = 0.000). The SF-36 preoperative PCS and MCS scores were 45.77 ± 3.59 and 60.67 ± 3.91, respectively, with postoperative improvements to 93.85 ± 2.65 (p = 0.000) and 95.79 ± 3.11 (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis indicates that a single olecranon osteotomy could be a viable treatment option for TTE. However, additional research involving a control group is essential to substantiate the efficacy of this technique.

Usability of Minimal Invasive Surgery for Elbow Dislocation with Coronoid Process Fracture: A Protocol Development Study

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to explain whether or not minimal invasive surgery (MIS) would be feasible in elbow fracture-dislocation with coronoid process fracture.

METHODS

At Taipei Veterans General Hospital, patients who had elbow dislocations with coronoid process fractures underwent a single surgeon's MIS techniques which included the fluoroscopy-guided ulnar anteromedial (FGUAM) approach in the stage of reducing the coronoid process. When there is a proximal ulnar fracture, the posterior incision should be necessary, followed by the incision over the lateral or medial elbow for treating radial fractures or ligament injuries.

RESULTS

The Flow Diagram for approach recommendation was established on the basis of defining MIS as that which does not include cross-plane dissection. The importance of anterior rigid fixation for the coronoid process was also emphasized.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS can be achieved by multiple limited surgical incisions. Although the posterior extensile approach is necessary in situations of ulnar metaphysis or ligament avulsion fracture, the FGUAM approach decreases the cross-plane dissection.

Preventing Proximal Radio-Ulnar Joint Screw Penetration during Coronoid Fracture Fixation: A 3D-Digital Modeling and Cadaver Study

Objective

Intra-articular screw penetration is a probable complication of coronoid fracture fixation. The present study aimed to determine the best radiography technique for visualizing the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) space. Moreover, it aimed to determine the safe angle and length of the screw to avoid PRUJ penetration during coronoid fracture fixation.

Methods

The Mimics software was used to construct a three-dimensional model of a healthy man's forearm from a computer tomography scan. It was analyzed using the Solidworks software to determine the X-ray angle that clearly showed the PRUJ space to detect penetration of screws from the coronoid process into the PRUJ and determine the maximum screw angle and length that could be used without intra-articular penetration. To verify these findings, a cadaveric study combined with radiographs was conducted.

Results

To visualize PRUJ space, the optimal X-ray angle was 13º lateral to the perpendicular line when the forearm was positioned at full supination. If the coronoid process was segmented into zones 1 (closest to the radioulnar joint) to 4 (farthest from the joint), the screw could only be inserted at a right angle in zone 1. In zones 2, 3, and 4, inclination angles less than 15, 35, and 60 would prevent intra-articular penetration, respectively.

Conclusions

The X-rays could visualize the PRUJ space with an anteroposterior radiograph at an angle of 13º ulnar deviation from the perpendicular plane. During coronoid process fracture fixation, shorter screws with less lateral inclination were safer when inserting screws in the zones of the coronoid process adjacent to the PRUJ.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.

The Novel Hooked Kirschner Wire Technique for Ulna Coronoid Process Fractures

Background

The aim of this study was to introduce a novel technique to improve the ease of fixing of even small fragments of the coronoid process and report the clinical outcomes of this method.

Methods

Forty-nine patients with ulnar coronoid process fractures fixed using the hooked Kirschner wire (K-wire) technique at our hospital from 2007 to 2019 were reviewed. Radiological features and fracture union were assessed using simple radiographs. Functional outcomes of the treated elbows were evaluated at the final follow-up visit using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results

All patients were examined at a mean follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 6-62 months). We observed bony union in patients at a mean of 10.9 weeks (range, 6-22 weeks). The mean flexion and extension ranges of the elbow were 132.0° (range, 106° -151°) and 4.5° (range, -20° to 30°), respectively. The mean pronation and supination ranges of the forearm were 81.1° (range, 60°-90°) and 88.3° (range, 60°-120°), respectively. The mean arc of the elbow was 127.4° (range, 78°-160°). All patients were evaluated using the MEPS at the final follow-up visit, with a mean score of 96.9 points (range, 80-100 points). One case of coronoid nonunion was observed and re-fixation was performed. One case of infection was observed and also treated with additional surgery. Three patients complained of ulnar nerve symptoms and 1 patient underwent surgical release for tardy ulnar nerve palsy.

Conclusions

Despite its limitations, the hooked K-wire technique was a useful method for even smaller coronoid process fractures. K-wires were also a useful temporary intraoperative fixation method and could provide permanent fixation.

Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Surgical fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures via mesh plate: A case report

Introduction

The coronoid process of the ulna is the primary stabilizer of the elbow joint. There has not yet been an accurate off-the-shelf dedicated implant because fragments of coronoid process fractures are often small and diverse. The variable angle locking compression mesh plate 2.4/2.7 (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) acts as a versatile, low-profile implant that can be cut to suit the specific fracture pattern and fits anatomically.

Case presentations

We report two cases of Regan–Morrey type II ulnar coronoid process fractures in terrible triad elbow injuries. In both cases, persistent instability was fluoroscopically diagnosed after repair of the lateral structures. We performed osteosynthesis for the ulnar coronoid process fractures using a mesh plate, which we cut into a rhombus-like shape and used as a buttress plate. Here we report the good results obtained thereof.

Conclusion

Considering our positive experience with using mesh plates, the mesh plate may be a good method of fixation for ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Clinical comparison of the over-the-top and flexor carpi ulnaris split approaches for the treatment of anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process

BACKGROUND

The flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)-split approach and the over-the-top approach have been used frequently for the fixation of anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures of the coronoid process. Clinical studies have not compared functional recovery and complication rates associated with these approaches. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of the over-the-top and FCU-split approaches for the treatment of AMF fractures of the coronoid process.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who underwent surgery for AMF fractures between January 2013 and August 2019 were divided into the FCU-split and over-the-top groups. The FCU-split approach was used from January 2013 to March 2016, and the over-the-top approach was used from April 2016 to August 2019. Bony union, radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (Broberg and Morrey classification), and development of heterotopic ossification were evaluated. Postoperative pain score (visual analog scale at 2 days after the operation), surgical time (minutes), range of motion of the elbow, elbow function (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS]), and the presence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy were also compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The FCU-split and over-the-top approaches were performed in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. The mean age was 46 ± 13 years (range, 22-67 years), and the mean follow-up duration was 19± 6.7 months (range, 13-38 months). All coronoid fractures had a solid osseous union during the follow-up, and no subluxation or dislocation was observed in the 2 groups. The occurrence of heterotopic ossification and the grade of post-traumatic arthritis did not differ significantly between the groups (all P > .05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative pain score, range of motion, and MEPS (all P > .05). However, the surgical time was shorter for the over-the-top approach than that for the FCU-split approach (79± 23 vs. 101 ± 14, P = .008), and the surgical time was significantly associated with the fracture classification and surgical approach (P = .001 and .003, respectively). In addition, postoperative ulnar neuropathy occurred less with the over-the-top approach than with the FCU-spilt approach (5.9% vs. 46%, P = .013).

CONCLUSION

Both the FCU-split and over-the-top approaches were appropriate for performing the buttress plate fixation for AMF fractures of the coronoid process and for restoring the elbow stability. The fixation of AMF fractures through the over-the-top approach was technically easier and had less incidence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy.

Morphological characteristics of fractures of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid in posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: a three-dimensional CT remodeling study

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid in posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow are classified into 3 subtypes based on their location. The purpose of this study was to analyze the fracture morphology of anteromedial facet fractures in their 3 subtypes (anteromedial rim, anteromedial rim + tip, and anteromedial rim + sublime tubercle [±tip]).

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography remodeling was used to evaluate anteromedial facet fractures in a consecutive series of 40 patients, all of whom were affected by posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow. Characteristics of the fractures, including the number of fragments, size of fragments, plane of the fracture line, and involvement of the sublime tubercle and radial notch, were measured for each subtype of the anteromedial facet fractures.

RESULTS

Each subtype had a typical fracture pattern and distinct size. The fracture subtype 1 showed a single-fragment fracture, subtype 2 showed either a single- or dual-fragment fracture, and subtype 3 showed either a dual- or triple-fragment fracture. The angle between the fracture line and the coronal plane was greatest in subtype 3 fractures. The surface area of the fragment was largest in subtype 3 fractures. The percentages of articular involvement of the sublime tubercle were 0% in subtype 1, 47% in subtype 2, and 79% in subtype 3. The percentages of articular involvement of the radial notch were 0% in subtype 1, 7% in subtype 2, and 8% in subtype 3.

CONCLUSION

Analysis with quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography showed the characteristic morphology of each subtype of anteromedial facet fracture. Subtype 1 comprised 1 fragment with the smallest fragment size. Subtype 2 was a single- or dual-fragment fracture, the size of which should be considered in the treatment plan. Subtype 3 was a large fragment comprising the sublime tubercle. Our findings are significant because they highlight unique fracture morphology that may help surgeons to distinguish one fracture subtype from another in clinical practice.

Results of standardized treatment of elbow fracture dislocations as per their injury pattern: a retrospective cohort of 89 patients

Background

Elbow fracture dislocations represent difficult injuries to treat, with a high percentage of complications. Classically, they are divided into posterolateral, posteromedial and transulnar pattern. It is essential to distinguish them to guide intraoperative treatment to achieve an anatomic and stable reduction that allows early mobility.

Methods

A retrospective study of 89 adult patients diagnosed with elbow fracture dislocations who underwent a standardized surgery between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Demographic data, characteristics of the injury, and associated procedures were collected. Patients were evaluated with functional scores (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey score) and ranges of movement at the end of the follow-up.

Results

The mean age was 41 ± 12 years, mostly men (82%), with an average follow-up of 29 months. We present 42 patients with posterolateral fracture dislocation (47%), 21 posteromedial (24%) and 26 transulnar (29%). The average range of motion at the end of follow-up was −12 ± 11° extension, 124 ± 20° flexion, 76 ± 16° pronation, and 73 ± 20° supination, with a Mayo elbow performance score of 88.7 ± 12 points and 87.2 ± 12 points in the Broberg and Morrey scale. Reoperation rate was 23%, with no infection or heterotopic ossification cases. Transulnar fracture dislocations have significantly worse extension and supination. As per the functional result (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey scale), there are no significant differences between the different patterns.

Conclusion

Proper injury pattern recognition and a standardized surgical management lead to a stable joint and good results in range of motion. Functional results are encouraging at least at short term, despite the high reoperations rate.

Surgical treatment of terrible triad of the elbow

Terrible triad of the elbow associates posterior dislocation, radial head fracture and coronoid process fracture. It is a complex trauma, associating severe bone and ligament lesions, with high more-or-less long-term risk of residual instability, stiffness, pain and osteoarthritis. During the last 20 years, pathologic, biomechanical and clinical knowledge has greatly progressed. Prevention of these severe complications requires initial understanding of the lesion mechanism and precise analysis of all lesions. Surgery aims to restore perfect stability by sequential anatomic repair, enabling early mobilization to prevent onset of stiffness. The aims of the present paper were to summarize the anatomic and pathophysiological bases, highlight the crucial importance of the humeroradial column and lateral collateral ligament, and to determine the importance of the coronoid process. Some aspects of treatment are controversial: systematic medial collateral ligament repair, or use of an articulated external fixator. Finally, we propose a simple algorithm to guide repair.

[Treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via a modified anteromedial approach]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of a modified anteromedial approach in the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture.

METHODS

Between February 2017 and July 2018, 15 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were reviewed. There were 9 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42.3 years (range, 24-60 years). The causes of injury included falling in 10 cases and traffic accidents in 5 cases, all cases were closed injury. According to the O'Driscoll classification, there were 4 cases of type Ⅰ, 6 cases of type Ⅱ, and 5 cases of type Ⅲ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.7 days). All fractures were treated via a modified anteromedial approach between the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis plus with partial incision of flexor tendon aponeurosis. The fracture healing, muscle strength of forearm, postoperative complications were observed. At last follow-up, the elbow mobility were measured, the function of elbow was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).

RESULTS

All cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.3 months). Fracture union was achieved in all patients with a mean time of 10 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). No obvious decrease of hand grip strength, nerve injury, and infection occurred. One patient had slight heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, all patients had stable elbows with good flexion-extension and varus-valgus stability, the mean flexion was 123.3° (range, 100°-140°), mean extension loss compared with that before operation was 6.7° (range, 0°-20°), mean pronation was 76.0° (range, 60°-85°), and mean supination was 75.8° (range, 55°-90°). The MEPS score was 65-100 (mean, 90.3) with the result of excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via the modified anteromedial approach provides excellent exposure, minimal invasion, fewer complications, and satisfactory prognosis, which is conducive to elbow joint function recovery.