Treatment of contact lens related dry eye with intense pulsed light

Immediate sequential changes in the tear film lipid layer following eyelid massage in dry eye syndrome: A comparative control study

Background/Purpose

Meibomian glands are sebaceous glands that release meibum onto the ocular surface; enhancing the quality and quantity of meibum secretions has been proven to improve signs and symptoms of evaporative dry eye (EDE) and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a heated eye mask (HEM) and eyelid massage device EyePeace (EP) in alleviating signs and symptoms of evaporative dry eye.

Methods

Forty dry eye participants were recruited in a prospective, contralateral-eye trial study. After undergoing 10 min of HEM therapy, eyelid massage therapy was applied to one eye by the device. The efficiency was assessed at four time points: baseline (0 min), 5 min (5 min), 15 min (15 min), and 30 min (30 min). Non-invasive breakup time (NITBUT), redness score (RS Score), tear meniscus height (TMH), tear-film lipid layer (TFLL), endothelial cell count (ECC), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), conjunctivocorneal staining (CS), ocular surface temperature (OST), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) flat-axis keratometry value (K1), and steep-axis keratometry value (K2), were examined.

Results

Baseline clinical measurements did not have statistically significant differences between the groups (all p > 0.05). After 30 min, a comparison was made between the HEM group and EP + HEM group, revealing significant changes only in the primary outcomes, TFLL (2.18 ± 0.45 versus 2.40 ± 0.50; p < 0.05), and MGEx grades (0.68 ± 0.53 versus 0.98 ± 0.70; p < 0.05). Improvements in NITBUT and TMH were sustained until 5 min and 15 min after using EP + HEM. No significant changes were observed in RS Score, MGQ, OST, CFS, BCVA, IOP, ECC, K1, K2, and CCT (all p > 0.05) at all test time points.

Conclusion

The application of a heated eye mask followed by a gentle massage using EyePeace on the eyelids can have a sustained improvement in the tear film lipid layer and meibomian gland expressivity score but not clinically significant, and does not pose any significant immediate impact on the cornea.Trial registration number: NCT06158997.

The Usage of Different Hyaluronic-Acid-Containing Artificial Tears and the Treatment Outcome of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Dry Eye Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of different hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing artificial tears on dry eye disease (DED) treatment in combination with intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and the participants received IPL therapy and HA-containing artificial tears. There were 42 and 40 eyes in the 0.10% and 0.15% HA groups after selection, respectively. The main outcomes were the postoperative non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), Schirmer II test results, ocular surface stain, and numbers of DED-related symptoms. A generalized linear model was utilized to produce the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the main outcomes between groups. At the three-month follow-up, the NITBUT was significantly higher in the 0.15% HA group (p = 0.023), and the NITBUT recovery was also significantly better in the 0.15% HA group compared to the 0.10% HA group (p = 0.039). The multiple DED-related symptoms significantly correlated with no DED symptom improvement in both the 0.10% and 0.15% HA groups (both p < 0.05), while the low pre-treatment NITBUT was marginally related to no DED symptom improvement in the 0.10% HA group (p = 0.047). A low NITBUT and Schirmer II test result correlated with no DED symptom improvement in both the groups (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the application of 0.10% and 0.15% HA-containing artificial tears revealed similar effects to IPL therapy for DED.

Management of Glaucoma-Related Dry Eye Disease with Intense Pulsed Light: A Randomized Control Study

Purpose

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in individuals diagnosed with glaucoma and dry eye disease (DED).

Methods

This randomized control study recruited 22 individuals diagnosed with glaucoma, ranging in age from 33 to 82 years. These participants were undergoing treatment with hypotensive eyedrops and had clinical indications and subjective complaints associated with dry eye. Each patient underwent three sessions of IPL therapy in one eye, while the contralateral eye served as the control eye (CT). The following parameters were assessed at three time points: baseline, week-2, and week-4. These parameters include non-invasive breakup time (NITBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), conjunctivocorneal epithelial staining score (CS), tear film lipid layer (TFLL), meibomian gland expressibility score (MGEx), Schirmer I test, ocular bulbar redness score (OBRS), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and corneal endothelial cell count (ECC) were assessed for safety. The clinical trial was registered on 25/12/2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov website (NCT06158984).

Results

Comparing baseline and 4-week measurements revealed that the IPL group found significant improvements in NITBUT (IPL: 8.74±2.60 sec. vs CT: 5.76±1.75 sec. p<0.01), TMH (IPL: 0.23±0.05mm vs CT: 0.19±0.06mm, p=0.011), C.S. (IPL: 1.14±0.56 vs CT: 1.95±1.17, p=0.005), TFLL (IPL: 2.91±2.91 vs CT:3.36±0.58, p=0.047), MGEx score (IPL: 1.14±0.35 vs CT: 1.45±0.51, p=0.020) and OSDI scores (IPL: 31.77±15.59 vs 50.59±21.55, p=0.002) significantly improved. Conversely, other parameters showed no significant improvements (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The progression of ocular surface disease in individuals using topical anti-glaucoma medication may worsen if the condition is not addressed. Nevertheless, IPL therapy has the potential to result in significant improvements in both objective and subjective measures of dry eye. Best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and intraocular pressure were determined to be within the permitted limits. No adverse events were reported during the course of the study.

Comparison of non-pharmaceutical treatments for evaporative dry eye: a randomised controlled study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The lipid layer of the tear film is critical to maintaining the integrity of the tear film and absence in the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) is one of the main causes of evaporative dry eye (EDE) in dry eye disease patients, resulting in excessive evaporation (so-called hyperevaporative dry eye). This study protocol will be designed to assess and compare the effects of intense pulsed light (IPL), heated eye mask (HEM), vectored thermal pulsation system (VTPS) and eyelid massage device (EMD) for improving signs and symptoms of EDE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with EDE will be randomly divided into IPL, HEM, VTPS and EMD groups and will be followed up for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT). The secondary outcome measures will include, TFLL score, meibomian gland quality and expressibility change from baseline conjunctivocorneal staining with fluorescein and lissamine, tear meniscus height, conjunctival hyperaemia (redness score) and ocular surface disease index questionnaire. Additionally, adverse events will be monitored and documented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval number: IRB(2023)K019.01. The findings will be shared regardless of the effect's direction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05923528.

Changes of dry eye parameters after small incision lenticule extraction surgery in patients with different ocular surface disease index scores

To evaluate the changes of dry eye parameters after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery in patients with different ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores. Prospective research. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A, OSDI < 13; and Group B, OSDI ≥ 13. The OSDI scores, tear meniscus height (TMH), first non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT-First), and meibomian gland loss (MGL, %) were recorded at postoperative 1 -week and 1-month.113 eyes (57 patients) were enrolled, 70 eyes in Group A, and 43 eyes in Group B. In Group A, the OSDI scores significantly increased at 1-week and 1-month postoperative (all P < 0.001); the TMH, NIBUT-First and lipid layer grade significantly decreased at postoperative 1-week (P = 0.003, 0.005, 0.007, 0.004, respectively), but returned to preoperative level at 1-month postoperative. In Group B, only the lipid layer grade significantly decreased at postoperative 1-week (P < 0.05). Patients with different preoperative OSDI scores may experience different changes early after SMILE surgery. Patients with OSDI scores < 13 may experience more dramatic changes in dry eye symptoms which would resolve, while subjective complains could still exists at 1 month after surgery.

The Combined Impact of Intense Pulsed Light Combined and 3% Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the combination of intense pulsed light (IPL) with 3% diquafosol (DQS) ophthalmic solution is more effective than intense pulsed light in alleviating signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

This randomized study included 66 participants with evaporative dry eye (EDE) who received IPL + DQS therapy (n = 44 eyes), IPL therapy (n = 44 eyes), or sham therapy (n = 44 eyes). All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 14 (D14), and day 28 (D28) for non-invasive break-up time (NITBUT), tear-film lipid layer (TFLL), corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expression (MGEx), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI).

RESULTS

At day 28, comparison among the IPL + DQS therapy, IPL therapy, and sham therapy found significant differences in the mean NITBUT (12.03 ± 1.27 versus 10.47 ± 3.48 versus 4.57 ± 0.46; p < 0.001), TFLL (2.09 ± 0.29 versus 2.27 ± 0.45 versus 2.89 ± 0.65; p < 0.001), CS (1.43 ± 0.82 versus 1.93 ± 1.32 versus 3.52 ± 1.00; p < 0.001), MGQ (1.55 ± 0.66 versus 1.91 ± 0.77 versus 2.66 ± 0.53; p < 0.001), MGEx (1.27 ± 0.45 versus 1.75 ± 0.44 versus 2.41 ± 0.50; p < 0.001), and OSDI score (19.36 ± 7.01 versus 24.77 ± 4.68 versus 42.61 ± 7.49; p < 0.001); significant improvements in NITBUT, TFLL, CS, MGQ, MGEx, and OSDI were found in the IPL + DQS therapy and IPL therapy, while the sham therapy had no significant improvements.

CONCLUSION

Combining 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with intense pulsed light was superior to IPL therapy alone in relieving the signs and symptoms of patients with severe evaporative DED.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT05694026.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

Comparison Between Optimal Pulsed Technology and Meibomian Gland Massage Treatment for Contact Lens-Related Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of optimal pulsed technology (OPT) and meibomian gland massage (MGM) in alleviating the signs and symptoms of contact lens-related meibomian gland dysfunction (CL-MGD). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study included 90 patients (180 eyes) diagnosed with CL-MGD and were assigned to the OPT group (n = 60 eyes), MGM group (n = 60 eyes), and control group (n = 60 eyes). All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), and day 42 (D42) for the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), noninvasive tear meniscus height (NITMH), meibomian gland score (MGS), meibomian gland score (MGYSS), best-corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure. Results: The OSDI scores and NITBUT improved after treatment in all the three groups. The OSDI scores in OPT and MGM groups were significantly lower compared with that in the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42. The NITBUT in OPT and MGM groups increased compared with the control group at D21 and further increased at D42, and the NITBUT in OPT group increased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The MGYSS both improved after treatment in the OPT and MGM groups, The MGYSS in OPT and MGM groups decreased compared with the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42, and the MGYSS in the OPT group decreased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The NITMH and MGS had no differences after treatment. Conclusions: Results imply that OPT or MGM treatment can be safely used to relieve symptoms of CL-MGD. In addition, OPT treatment was found to be more effective in improving the general stability of the tear-film in CL-MGD.

Protocol for a parallel assignment prospective, randomised, comparative trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with 3% diquafosol (DQS) ophthalmic solution in dry eye syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Evaporative dry eye (EDE) is common and can lead to ocular pain, decreased visual quality and reduced quality of life. Intense pulsed light (IPL) and 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution have been found to be beneficial in reducing signs and symptoms of dry eye.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A randomised clinical trial will be performed at He Eye Specialist Hospital in Shenyang. 360 dry eye disease patients will be equally divided randomly into the IPL group, DQS group (3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution eye-drops) and IPL+group (IPL combined with 3% diquafosol eye-drops). All groups will be followed up for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measures will be the non-invasive tear break-up time and the Ocular Surface Disease Index change from the baseline. The secondary outcome measures willincludeconjunctival and cornea staining with fluorescein and lissamine, meibomian gland function and secretion quality, tear film lipid layer score, tear meniscus height, conjunctival hyperemia (redness score) changes . Adverse events also will be monitored and documented.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to assess whether the combination of IPL with 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution (study group), IPL+ (study group), is more effective than IPL (active control group) or DQS (active control group) in participants with EDE.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Management of dry eye with IPL combined with 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution, registered on 23 January 2023. Ethics approval number: IRB (2022) K029.01. The study's findings will be shared regardless of the effect's direction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05694026.

Tear Film Lipid Layer Changes Following Combined Effect of Heated Eye Mask with Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Randomized Control Study

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. Methods: This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (p < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (p < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (p < 0.05), MGQ (p < 0.05), MGEx (p < 0.05), and OSDI (p < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (r = -0.678, p < 0.001), ΔCS (r = 0.321, p < 0.001), ΔMGQ (r = 0.669, p < 0.001), ΔMGEx (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.

Managing Severe Evaporative Dry Eye with Intense Pulsed Light Therapy

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in participants with severe evaporative dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, single-center study included 49 adult participants (≥ 18 years) with severe evaporative DED who received either IPL therapy (n = 56 eyes) or sham therapy (n = 42 eyes) three times. The primary efficacy parameters were ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), tear film lipid layer (TFLL), conjunctivocorneal staining score (CS), MG Score, meibomian gland (MG) quality, and MG expression score.

RESULTS

The mean ages for the IPL group and the control group were 28.05 ± 3.41 years (57.1% female) and 28.14 ± 3.53 years (52.4% female), respectively. Comparison between the IPL group and the control group found significant differences in the mean OSDI score (22.16 ± 6.08 vs. 42.38 ± 6.60; P < 00.01), NITBUT (6.27 ± 0.84 vs. 3.86 ± 0.68; P < 0.001), TFLL (2.14 ± 0.44 vs. 3.45 ± 0.50; P < 0.001), MG Score (1.34 ± 0.55 vs. 1.88 ± 0.33; P < 0.001), MG quality (1.59 ± 0.07 vs. 2.67 ± 0.08), and MG expression (1.54 ± 0.57 vs. 2.45 ± 0.55) at 12 weeks follow-up; however, there was no significant difference in CS (3.32 ± 1.11 vs. 3.74 ± 1.04; P = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that IPL therapy is clinically beneficial in ameliorating the signs and symptoms of severe evaporative dry eye disease.

Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in Dry Eye Disease Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in patients harboring dry eye disease caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) based on qualified studies.

METHODS

The electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched using keywords to identify available publications updated to November 2021. Relative risk or weighted mean difference combined with 95% confidence interval was used to synthesize the outcomes of included studies. The meta-analysis included 15 randomized controlled trials with 1,142 patients (2,284 eyes).

RESULTS

The results revealed that IPL could significantly decrease the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED), artificial tear usage, tear film lipid layer, meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expression (MGX), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) while increase tear break-up time (TBUT) and noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) compared with sham. Compared with MGX, IPL+MGX markedly decreased the SPEED, CFS, and tear meniscus height (TMH), but with increased TBUT. Compared with MGX, IPL showed significant effect in increasing the OSDI and TBUT, but decreasing the TMH and NIBUT. However, no significant differences were seen between IP+MGX and MGX in OSDI, MGQ, and MGX, nor between IPL and MGX in OSDI, SPEED, and TBUT.

CONCLUSION

We identified that the application of IPL alone or IPL combined with MGX elicited superior clinical effect for improving the eye function and symptoms in the treatment of MGD-related dry eye disease, which is considered available for wide clinical application.

The Effects of Soft Contact Lens Wear on The Tear Film and Meibomian Gland Drop-Out and Visibility

As contact lens (CL) wear affects the ocular surface, this cross-sectional study aims to assess the effects of soft CL wear and its duration on the tear film and meibomian gland (MG) drop-out and visibility. Thirty non-CL wearers (22.5 ± 2.3 years) and twenty-four soft CL wearers (23.8 ± 2.2 years) participated in this study. The Keratograph 5M was used to assess the ocular surface. CL users were surveyed on years of CL wear and hours per week. MG visibility was assessed using a previously developed method based on analysing pixel intensity of meibographies. The CL group showed higher gland drop-out (p < 0.001) and lower gland visibility (p < 0.022). Gland drop-out was independently associated with CL wear (p = 0.006). When gland drop-out was excluded, the relative energy of pixel intensity values showed an independent association with CL wear (p = 0.005). Prolonged hours of CL wear were associated with higher dry eye symptoms and entropy of MGs (p < 0.029). A reduction in non-invasive keratograph break-up time was associated with using CLs for ≥8 years (p = 0.030). Overall, gland drop-out was higher and gland visibility lower in soft CL wearers. New gland visibility metrics might help to assess MGs in soft CL wearers quickly and objectively.

Comparison Between Heated Eye Mask and Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Contact Lens-Related Dry Eye

Background: Contact lens-related dry eye (CLDE) is common in contact lens (CL) wearers and can lead to ocular pain, decreased visual quality, and reduced quality of life. Objective: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, examiner masked study was to compare the effectiveness of intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) for relieving CLDE. Methods: The final analysis included 60 patients (30 in the IPL group and 30 in the HEM group) who were using CL and had been suffering contact lens discomfort for more than a year. The IPL treatment group had two IPL treatments spaced 3 weeks apart, whereas the HEM group received HEM daily for 6 weeks (42 days). Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), tear-film lipid layer (TFLL), conjunctival fluorescein staining, meibum gland quality and expression, conjunctival redness score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and intraocular pressure were assessed at baseline: first visit (V1), second visit (V2), and third visit (V3). Results: The mean age of the IPL group was 28.6 ± 4.3 years (16 females, 53%) and that of the HEM group was 28.6 ± 4.2 years (16 females, 53%). Mean NITBUT for the IPL group at V2 was 5.53 ± 0.77 sec (p < 0.001) and at V3 was 7.72 ± 0.88 sec (p < 0.001); the IPL group demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant improvement in mean NITBUT. In addition, the HEM group showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in mean NITBUT at V3 (5.86 ± 0.76 sec, p < 0.001). At V3, the C-OSDI, TFLL score, and meibum gland quality and expressibility all increased considerably (p < 0.05) in both groups. Conclusions: Our results imply that IPL or HEM treatment of CLDE can be safely used to relieve symptoms of CLDE. In addition, IPL treatment is more effective in improving the general stability of the tear-film and decreasing the need for artificial tears in CLDE.

Management of Post-LASIK Dry Eye with Intense Pulsed Light in Combination with 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate and Heated Eye Mask

INTRODUCTION

Laser in situ keratomelieusis (LASIK) is one of the most frequently performed refractive treatments. Dry eye (DE) is common in patients after LASIK and can be bothersome postoperatively. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL), sodium hyaluronate (SH) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve signs and symptoms of DE .

AIM

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate and compare the effects of IPL and 0.1% SH (IPL group, 50 eyes) and IPL in combination with 0.1% SH and HEM (IPL + group, 50 eyes) in participants with persistent post-LASIK DE.

METHODS

The final analysis included 100 patients (100 eyes) who had LASIK for myopic correction and had been experiencing moderate to severe DE following LASIK for over a year. Participants were randomly assigned to either the IPL group (2 IPL sessions) or IPL + group (2 IPL sessions and daily HEM for 4 weeks), and both groups continued the use of daily 0.1% SH (HYLO-COMOD®) preservative-free eye drops. Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), tear film lipid layer (TFLL), lower tear meniscus height (LTMH), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and artificial tear usage (ATU) survey were assessed at baseline (BL) and follow-up at 2 (F1) and 4 weeks (F2).

RESULTS

Following the treatment protocol, all dry eye (DE) parameters assessed in this study improved significantly (P < 0.05) in both groups at F2 compared with their respective BL measurements. Inter-group comparison at F2 found significant differences in their NITBUT (IPL: 6.06 ± 0.59 vs. IPL +: 6.67 ± 0.86, P < 0.001), TFLL (IPL: 1.90 ± 0.65 vs. IPL +: 1.60 ± 0.64, P = 0.021), LTMH (IPL: 0.186 ± 0.053 vs. 0.204 ± 0.034, P = 0.003), MGQ (IPL: 1.48 ± 0.54 vs. IPL +: 1.26 ± 0.56, P = 0.026), MGEx (IPL: 1.62 ± 0.53 vs. IPL +: 1.44 ± 0.50, P = 0.038) and OSDI (IPL: 32.54 ± 6.85 vs. IPL +: 29.76 ± 4.74, P = 0.001), while CFS score (IPL: 4.02 ± 0.65 vs. IPL +: 3.96 ± 0.73, P = 0.652) and ATU (IPL: 1.88 ± 0.63 vs. IPL +: 1.72 ± 0.50, P = 0.159) showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Post-LASIK DE signs and symptoms can be improved by combining therapies such as IPL, HEM and 0.1% SH. Increased TFLL due to a combination of IPL, 0.1% SH and HEM had a greater positive impact on the subjective and objective DE measurements in participants with persistent post-LASIK DE.