Brain Metastases in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Assessment of Molecular Genotype-Phenotype Features-An Entity With an Increasing Incidence?

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Brain Metastases from Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancers

BACKGROUND

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with brain metastases from hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancers has yet to be established. The authors present a single-institution experience of patients with HPB cancers who underwent SRS when their cancer spread to the brain.

METHODS

We surveyed our Gamma Knife SRS data base of 18,000 patients for the years 1987-2022. In total, 19 metastatic HPB cancer patients (13 male) with 76 brain metastases were identified. The median age at SRS was 61 years (range: 48-83). The primary cancer sites were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 11 patients), cholangiocarcinoma (CCC, 2 patients), and pancreatic carcinoma (PCC, 6 patients). The median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 80 (range: 50-90). Two patients underwent pre-SRS whole-brain fractionated radiation therapy (WBRT) and eight patients underwent pre-SRS surgical resection. All SRS was delivered in single session. The median margin dose was 18 Gy (range: 15-20). The median cumulative tumor volume was 8.1 cc (range: 1.0-44.2).

RESULTS

The median patient overall survival (OS) after SRS was 7 months (range 1-79 months). Four patients had documented local tumor progression after SRS at a median time of 8.5 months (range: 2-15) between SRS and progression. Out of 76 treated tumors, 72 tumors exhibited local control. The local tumor control rate per patient was 78.9%. The local tumor control per tumor was 94.7%. Four patients developed new brain metastases at a median of 6.5 months (range: 2-17) after SRS. No patient experienced adverse radiation effects (AREs). At the last follow-up, 18 patients had died, all from systemic disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic spread to the brain from HPB cancers occurs late in the course of the primary disease. In this study, all deceased patients ultimately died from primary disease progression. SRS is a non-invasive strategy that maximally preserves quality of life, and our results reported favorable outcomes compared to the existing literature. SRS should be considered as one of the primary management strategies for patients with brain metastatic spread from HPB cancer.

Management and outcomes of brain metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pooled analysis and literature review

Background

Brain metastases (BM) are rare in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and little data exists concerning these patients and their outcomes.

Aim

We aimed to analyze the management, practices, and outcomes of patients presenting BM from PDAC both in our institution and in all cases reported in the literature.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, monocentric analysis using a data mining tool (ConSoRe) to identify all patients diagnosed with PDAC and BM in our comprehensive cancer center (Paoli-Calmettes Institute), from July 1997 to June 2022 (cohort 1). Simultaneously, we reviewed and pooled the case reports and case series of patients with PDAC and BM in the literature (cohort 2). The clinical characteristics of patients in each cohort were described and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

In cohort 1, 19 patients (0.3%) with PDAC and BM were identified with a median age of 69 years (range: 39-81). Most patients had metastatic disease (74%), including 21% with BM, at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 58% of patients. 68% of patients had neurological symptoms and 68% were treated by focal treatment (surgery: 21%, radiotherapy: 42%, Gamma Knife radiosurgery: 5%). In cohort 2, among the 61 PDAC patients with BM described in the literature, 59% had metastatic disease, including 13% with BM at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 36% of patient and BM treatments included: surgery (36%), radiotherapy (36%), radiosurgery (3%), or no local treatment (25%). After the pancreatic cancer diagnosis, the median time to develop BM was 7.8 months (range: 0.0-73.9) in cohort 1 and 17.0 months (range: 0.0-64.0) in cohort 2. Median overall survival (OS) in patients of cohort 1 and cohort 2 was 2.9 months (95% CI [1.7,4.0]) and 12.5 months (95% CI [7.5,17.5]), respectively.

Conclusion

BM are very uncommon in PDAC and seem to occur more often in younger patients with lung metastases and more indolent disease. BM are associated with poor prognosis and neurosurgery offers the best outcomes and should be considered when feasible.

Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Support Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. While population-wide screening recommendations for PDAC in asymptomatic individuals are not achievable due to its relatively low incidence, pancreatic cancer surveillance programs are recommended for patients with germline causative variants in PDAC susceptibility genes or a strong family history. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline alterations in major genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, TP53) involved in PDAC susceptibility. We performed a systematic review of PubMed publications reporting germline variants identified in these genes in PDAC patients. Overall, the retrieved articles included 1493 PDAC patients. A high proportion of these patients (n = 1225/1493, 82%) were found to harbor alterations in genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Specifically, the remaining PDAC patients were reported to carry alterations in genes playing a role in other cancer pathways (CDKN2A, STK11, TP53; n = 181/1493, 12.1%) or in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; n = 87/1493, 5.8%). Our findings highlight the importance of germline genetic characterization in PDAC patients for better personalized targeted therapies, clinical management, and surveillance.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with brain metastases

Brain metastases are rare for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The incidence of brain metastasis may increase as improved systemic treatment regimens improve overall survival. Given the low incidence of brain metastasis, recognition of disease and management remain a challenge. We report three cases of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with brain metastases, review the literature and discuss its management principles.

Brain Metastasis from Pancreatic Cancer: Our Experience and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review existing literature on the neurosurgical management and outcomes of brain metastasis from pancreatic cancer in comparison with our institutional experience of this patient cohort.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from date of database inception to March 2022. Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Simultaneously, a retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent neurosurgical evaluation and treatment for intracranial metastatic lesions from pancreatic origin at a single institution.

RESULTS

The original literature search yielded 292 articles, of which 17 studies comprising 23 patients with brain metastases of pancreatic origin were ultimately selected. Median overall survival from primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was 22 months (interquartile range: 3-84) and 3 months (interquartile range: 1-36) after diagnosis of brain metastasis. In our institutional cohort, 4 patients were identified with a median overall survival of 30.5 months (interquartile range: 2-108). Our institutional cohort experienced a prolonged median overall survival (3 months vs. 30.5 months, P = 0.03) compared with the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain metastasis from pancreatic cancer is rare and associated with a fatal outcome. However, based on the data presented in this review, patient-specific and treatment-related factors could signal better prognosis. Further studies are needed to elucidate multimodal therapy and survival to suggest a more personalized decision-making process.

Leptomeningeal disease in BRIP1-mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Leptomeningeal disease is rare in pancreatic cancer and prognosis remains poor. Mutation profiles are now directing therapy to improve survival. We describe a case of leptomeningeal and brain metastasis in BRCA1 interacting protein 1, or BRIP1-mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma with progression through several lines of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. A woman in her late 50s presented with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma on liver biopsy. She achieved complete response after modified FOLFIRINOX and started a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for a BRIP1 mutation. She had recurrence at 9 months and started pembrolizumab (programmed cell death protein 1, or PD-1receptor antibody) for tumour mutational burden of 10 muts/Mb. At 10 months, she presented with lower extremity weakness and back pain. MRI revealed leptomeningeal metastases from T11 to cauda equina roots and right occipital metastasis. Cerebrospinal fluid studies revealed elevated pressure (290 mm H2O) and protein (73 mg/dL) with negative cytology. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis was diagnosed. She began palliative radiation but died at 11 months from initial diagnosis.

Incidence and impact of brain metastasis in patients with hereditary BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated invasive breast cancer

Patients with hereditary mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2) and breast cancer have distinct tumor biology, and encompass a predilection for brain metastasis (BM). We looked into baseline risk of BMs among gBRCA1/2 patients. Patients with gBRCA1/2, stage I-III invasive breast cancer seen between 2000–2017 with parenchymal BMs. Among gBRCA1 with distant breast cancer recurrence, 34 of 76 (44.7%) were diagnosed with brain metastases compared to 7 of 42 (16.7%) patients with gBRCA2. In the comparator group, 65 of 182 (35.7%) noncarrier triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and a distant recurrence experienced BM’s. In a competitive risk analysis using death as a competing factor, the cumulative incidence of BMs was similar between gBRCA1 and noncarrier TNBC patients. The time from primary breast cancer diagnosis to detection of BMs was similar between gBRCA1 and noncarrier TNBC patients (2.4 vs 2.2 years). Survival was poor after BMs (7.8 months for gBRCA1 patients vs. 6.2 months for TNBC noncarriers). Brain was a more common site of initial distant recurrence in gBRCA1 patients versus TNBC noncarriers (26.3% vs. 12.1%). Importantly, the presence of BMs, adversely impacted overall survival across groups (HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.12–2.53), hazard ratio for death if a patient had BMs at the time of initial breast cancer recurrence vs. not). In conclusion, breast cancer BMs is common and is similarly frequent among gBRCA1 and noncarrier patients with recurrent TNBC. Our study highlights the importance of improving the prevention and treatment of BMs in patients with TNBC, gBRCA1 carriers, and noncarriers.

Unusual metastasis in BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer while on maintenance Olaparib: Two case reports and review of the literature

The most common metastatic sites of pancreatic cancer are the liver, lymph nodes, peritoneum and lung. Here we report two cases of BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer that developed unusual metastasis while treatment with maintenance Olaparib and leading to rapid death. We hereby review the literature and address the possibility of a different nature and tumour biology of BRCA mutated cancer treated with PARP inhibitors.

Leptomeningeal disease in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma: A manifestation of longevity

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) metastatic to the leptomeninges is a rare and lethal event. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) research is limited in PDAC, and insights into clinical descriptors, possible disease predictors, and treatment strategies is necessitated.

METHODS

Memorial Sloan Kettering databases were queried with Institutional Review Board approval to identify patients with LMD and PDAC treated between January 2000 and June 2020. Medical record review was used to abstract clinical, genomic, pathologic, and radiographic data. Overall survival was calculated from date of PDAC diagnosis to date of death. Previously published literature on LMD from PDAC was reviewed.

RESULTS

Four patients with LMD from PDAC were identified, two males and two females. Age at diagnosis ranged from 57 to 68 years. All four patients had predominant lung metastasis and a relatively low burden of intra-abdominal disease. Somatic testing indicated alterations typical of PDAC and no PDAC defining pathogenic germline mutations were identified. An extended clinical course prior to LMD diagnosis was observed in all patients, ranging from 16 to 148 months. Upon diagnosis of LMD, three patients elected for supportive care and one patient received a limited course of craniospinal radiation. The median survival following diagnosis of LMD was 1.6 months (range 0.5-2.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

LMD from PDAC is a rare occurrence that may be more frequent in patients with lung metastasis and/or a more indolent clinical course. Following diagnosis of LMD, prognosis is poor, and survival is short. New treatment strategies for this manifestation of PDAC are needed.

Simultaneous brain and lung metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative pancreatectomy: a case report and literature review

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) rarely metastasizes to the brain; therefore, the features of brain metastasis of PDAC are still unknown. We encountered simultaneous metastases to the brain and lung in a PDAC patient after curative surgery.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old man with PDAC in the tail of the pancreas underwent distal pancreato-splenectomy. He received gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. Two months later, brain and lung metastases occurred simultaneously. Considering the systemic condition, the patient received gamma knife treatment and an Ommaya reservoir was inserted for drainage. The patient’s condition gradually worsened and he received the best supportive care. To the best of our knowledge, only 28 cases in which brain metastases of PDAC were identified at the time of ante-mortem have been reported to date, including the present case. Notably, the percentage of simultaneous brain and lung metastases was higher (32%) in a series of reviewed cohorts. Thus, lung metastasis might be one of the risk factors for the development of brain metastasis in patients with PDAC. As a systemic disease, it can be inferred that neoplastic cells will develop brain metastasis via hematogenous dissemination beyond the blood–brain barrier, even if local recurrence is controlled. In our case, immunohistochemical staining showed that the neoplastic cells were positive for carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX), mucin core protein 1 (MUC1), and MUC5AC in the resected primary PDAC.

Conclusion

We describe a case of simultaneous brain and lung metastases of PDAC after curative pancreatectomy, review previous literature, and discuss the clinical features of brain metastasis of PDAC.

Increased risk of brain metastases in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutations

PURPOSE

To estimate the risk for brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer using real-world data, and assess whether BRCA mutations increase that risk.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 4515 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer between January 1, 2011, and January 31, 2018, from the Flatiron Health database, a longitudinal, demographically, and geographically diverse database derived from electronic health records in the United States.

RESULTS

Forty-six (1%) patients were diagnosed with brain metastases after being diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Of 4515 patients with ovarian cancer, 10% had a known BRCA mutation, 37% had BRCA wildtype (BRCAwt), and the BRCA status of the remaining 51% was unknown/untested. Brain metastases were observed in 3% of patients with BRCA mutations compared with 0.6% of those with BRCAwt. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for the proportion of patients with brain metastases within 5 years of diagnosis was 5.7% in the population with BRCA mutations compared with 1.4% in those with BRCAwt (hazard ratio 4.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.97, 10.00; P < 0.0001). These data demonstrate that patients with a BRCA mutation had a significantly higher risk for brain metastases than those without.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a rare manifestation of ovarian cancer, the possibility of developing brain metastases should be considered in these patients, especially in patients with a BRCA mutation. The availability of new therapeutic options that may prolong overall survival and may not cross the blood-brain barrier could also lead to an increase in brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer.