What we have learned about lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome: A systematic literature review

Lymphocytic Variant Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: Case Series From a Tertiary Referral Center in Canada

Background

Lymphocytic variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is a rare disorder characterized by persistent eosinophilia driven by aberrant T-cell populations. Diagnosis remains challenging due to the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients diagnosed with L-HES between 2016 and 2023. Comprehensive flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood samples.

Results

Nine patients demonstrated the classic sCD3-CD4+CD5+CD2+CD45RO+CD45RA- immunophenotype, ranging from 0.6% to 70% of total lymphocytes. Two patients showed variant sCD3-CD4+ phenotypes, five had expanded (> 10%) sCD3+CD4+CD7- T-cells, and two displayed aberrant CD8+ T-LGL populations. Clonality was established in all patients with nonclassic phenotypes by molecular TCR testing or based on uniform TRBC1. We assessed a serial gating strategy to quantify the classic L-HES phenotype and found this to be highly sensitive and specific with an estimated limit of detection of 0.06% of lymphocytes. Using this strategy, we identified decreased but detectable abnormal T-cells in all classic phenotype patients reassessed posttreatment, down to as low as 0.3% of lymphocytes. The identification of T-LGL phenotypes with eosinophilia is a novel finding.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the diverse immunophenotypic spectrum of L-HES, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive flow cytometry analysis for accurate diagnosis.

A practical approach to the modern diagnosis and classification of T- and NK-cell lymphomas

ABSTRACT

T- and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas are neoplasms derived from immature T cells (lymphoblastic lymphomas), or more commonly, from mature T and NK cells (peripheral T-cell lymphomas, PTCLs). PTCLs are rare but show marked biological and clinical diversity. They are usually aggressive and may present in lymph nodes, blood, bone marrow, or other organs. More than 30 T/NK-cell-derived neoplastic entities are recognized in the International Consensus Classification and the classification of the World Health Organization (fifth edition), both published in 2022, which integrate the most recent knowledge in hematology, immunology, pathology, and genetics. In both proposals, disease definition aims to integrate clinical features, etiology, implied cell of origin, morphology, phenotype, and genetic features into biologically and clinically relevant clinicopathologic entities. Cell derivation from innate immune cells or specific functional subsets of CD4+ T cells such as follicular helper T cells is a major determinant delineating entities. Accurate diagnosis of T/NK-cell lymphoma is essential for clinical management and mostly relies on tissue biopsies. Because the histological presentation may be heterogeneous and overlaps with that of many benign lymphoid proliferations and B-cell lymphomas, the diagnosis is often challenging. Disease location, morphology, and immunophenotyping remain the main features guiding the diagnosis, often complemented by genetic analysis including clonality and high-throughput sequencing mutational studies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the classification and diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma in the context of current concepts and scientific knowledge.

Possible Association of CD3+CD4-CD8- Phenotype of T-Cell Lymphoma with Peripheral Blood Eosinophilia

INTRODUCTION

Because the prognosis of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma is poor compared to that of patients with B-cell lymphoma, we want to avoid further organ damage by eosinophilia. Moreover, in patients with some types of lymphoma, blood eosinophilia is implicated in a worse prognosis. To study the risk factors of eosinophilia, the association between lymphoma type, immunophenotypic features, and peripheral blood eosinophil counts were examined in the patients with mature T-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 28 patients with mature T-cell lymphoma who were admitted to our hospital and whose immunophenotypic features were confirmed using flow cytometric, immunohistochemical analysis, or both between December 2012 and November 2023.

RESULTS

We report a possible association between peripheral eosinophilia and peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified and CD3+CD4-D8- (double-negative) phenotypes. Mild eosinophilia was observed in various types, but moderate and severe eosinophilia were observed in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified. Double-negative phenotype was rarely observed; however, all patients with double-negative phenotype exhibited peripheral blood eosinophilia. In addition, four of the five cases of the double-negative type were peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified.

CONCLUSION

Here, we retrospectively examined patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma whose immunophenotypic features were confirmed and report a possible association between peripheral eosinophilia and peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified and CD3+CD4-CD8- (double-negative) phenotypes. In addition, clinicians should be aware of the possible risk that patients with lymphocytic hypereosinophilic syndrome of the double-negative phenotype may develop peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndromes and rare dysimmune conditions associated with hyper-eosinophilia in practice: An innovative multidisciplinary approach

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) represent a group of rare dis-immune conditions characterized by blood hyper-eosinophilia and eosinophilic related burden. Especially the idiopathic subtype (I-HES) is particularly difficult to diagnose because of its heterogeneous clinical presentation, the lack of specific findings on physical exam, lab tools, and imaging informative enough to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis and the overlap with other entities, including eosinophilic organ-diseases or systemic dis-immune conditions other than I-HES (from atopy to eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis [EGPA], the last often extremely difficult to distinguish from HES). Taken together, all the features mentioned above account for an extremely difficult early recognition HES and on-time referral to a specialized centre. The referral itself is challenging due to a not univocal specialist identification, because of the variability of physicians managing HES in different settings (including allergist/clinical immunologist, haematologist, internal medicine doctors, pulmonologist, rheumatologist). Furthermore, the approach in terms of personalized treatment identification and follow-up plan (timing, organ assessment), is poorly standardized. Further translational and clinical research is needed to address the mentioned unmet needs, but on practical grounds increasing the overall clinicians' awareness on HES and implementing healthcare pathways for HES patients represent a roadmap that every clinician might try to realize in his specific setting. The present review aims at providing an overview about the current challenges and unmet needs in the practical approach to HES and rare hypereosinophilic allergo-immunological diseases, including a proposal for an innovative multidisciplinary organizational model.

Managing Patients with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Statement from the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses a heterogeneous and complex group of different subtypes within the wider group of hypereosinophilic disorders. Despite increasing research interest, several unmet needs in terms of disease identification, pathobiology, phenotyping, and personalized treatment remain to be addressed. Also, the prospective burden of non-malignant HES and, more in general, HE disorders is currently unknown. On a practical note, shortening the diagnostic delay and the time to an appropriate treatment approach probably represents the most urgent issue, even in light of the great impact of HES on the quality of life of affected patients. The present document represents the first action that the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC) has finalized within a wider project aiming to establish a collaborative national network on HES (InHES-Italian Network on HES) for patients and physicians. The first step of the project could not but focus on defining a common language as well as sharing with all of the medical community an update on the most recent advances in the field. In fact, the existing literature has been carefully reviewed in order to critically integrate the different views on the topic and derive practical recommendations on disease identification and treatment approaches.

Multiple lymphadenopathies in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: Differentiating from IgG4-related lymphadenopathy

We report a case of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in a 75-year-old man who developed mononeuritis multiplex and purpura in the lower legs concomitantly presenting with lymphadenopathies. Biopsied lymph node tissue pathologically demonstrated fibrinoid necrotising vasculitis with perivascular eosinophil infiltration, resulting in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis diagnosis. Additionally, abundant immunoglobulin (Ig) G4-positive plasma cell infiltration exhibiting >70% IgG4/IgG ratio, without storiform pattern fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis, was observed in the biopsied lymph node. Clinical improvement was observed after corticosteroid therapy. IgG4-related lymphadenopathy has been defined as a distinct clinical category regardless of fulfilling IgG4-related disease classification criteria. However, some autoimmune diseases, including eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, can develop lymphadenopathy pathologically similar to IgG4-related lymphadenopathy.

Clinical and Therapeutic Intervention of Hypereosinophilia in the Era of Molecular Diagnosis

Hypereosinophilia (HE) presents with an elevated peripheral eosinophilic count of >1.5 × 109/L and is composed of a broad spectrum of secondary non-hematologic disorders and a minority of primary hematologic processes with heterogenous clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to potentially lethal outcome secondary to end-organ damage. Following the introduction of advanced molecular diagnostics (genomic studies, RNA sequencing, and targeted gene mutation profile, etc.) in the last 1-2 decades, there have been deep insights into the etiology and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of HE. The classification of HE has been updated and refined following to the discovery of clinically novel markers and targets in the 2022 WHO classification and ICOG-EO 2021 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorder and Syndromes. However, the diagnosis and management of HE is challenging given its heterogeneity and variable clinical outcome. It is critical to have a diagnostic algorithm for accurate subclassification of HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (e.g., reactive, familial, idiopathic, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm, organ restricted, or with unknown significance) and to follow established treatment guidelines for patients based on its clinical findings and risk stratification.

Hematological Neoplasms with Eosinophilia

Eosinophils in peripheral blood account for 0.3-5% of leukocytes, which is equivalent to 0.05-0.5 × 109/L. A count above 0.5 × 109/L is considered to indicate eosinophilia, while a count equal to or above 1.5 × 109/L is defined as hypereosinophilia. In bone marrow aspirate, eosinophilia is considered when eosinophils make up more than 6% of the total nuclear cells. In daily clinical practice, the most common causes of reactive eosinophilia are non-hematologic, whether they are non-neoplastic (allergic diseases, drugs, infections, or immunological diseases) or neoplastic (solid tumors). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may be reactive or secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines, and this is mainly seen in lymphoid neoplasms (Hodgkin lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome, and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may also be neoplastic or primary, derived from the malignant clone, usually in myeloid neoplasms or with its origin in stem cells (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, acute myeloid leukemia with core binding factor translocations, mastocytosis, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic neoplasms). There are no concrete data in standardized cytological and cytometric procedures that could predict whether eosinophilia is reactive or clonal. The verification is usually indirect, based on the categorization of the accompanying hematologic malignancy. This review focuses on the broad differential diagnosis of hematological malignancies with eosinophilia.

French guidelines for the etiological workup of eosinophilia and the management of hypereosinophilic syndromes

Eosinophilic-related clinical manifestations are protean and the underlying conditions underpinning eosinophilia are highly diverse. The etiological workup of unexplained eosinophilia/hypereosinophilia can be challenging, and can lead sometimes to extensive, inappropriate, costly and/or invasive investigations. To date, guidelines for the etiological workup and management of eosinophilia are mainly issued by hematologists, and thus mostly cover the scope of clonal hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES). Here, thanks to an extensive literature review, and thanks to the joint work of a large panel of experts involving physicians from both adult and pediatric medicine and from various subspecialties (as well as a representative of a patients' association representative), we provide recommendations for both the step-by step diagnostic workup of eosinophilia (whether unexplained or within specific contexts) as well as the management and follow-up of the full spectrum of eosinophilic disorders (including clonal, reactive, lymphocytic and idiopathic HES, as well as single-organ diseases). Didactic prescription summaries intended to facilitate the prescription of eosinophil-targeted drugs are also provided, as are practical diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. Lastly, this set of recommendations also includes a summary intended for general practitioners, as well as an overview of the therapeutic patient education program set up by the French reference center for HES. Further updates will be mandatory as new validated information emerges.

Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes

Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE-induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be "non-clonal" cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Approach to the patient with suspected hypereosinophilic syndrome

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a heterogenous group of rare disorders with clinical manifestations ranging from fatigue to life-threatening endomyocardial fibrosis and thromboembolic events. Given the broad differential diagnosis of HES, a comprehensive approach is needed to identify potential secondary (treatable) causes and define end-organ manifestations. Classification by clinical HES subtype is also useful in terms of assessing prognosis and guiding therapy. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of initial therapy in the setting of acute, life-threatening PDGFR mutation-negative HES. Whereas the recent availability of eosinophil-targeted therapies with extraordinary efficacy and little apparent toxicity is changing the treatment paradigm, especially for idiopathic HES and overlap syndromes, questions remain unanswered regarding the choice of agent, impact of combination therapies, and long-term effects of eosinophil depletion. This review provides a case-based discussion of the differential diagnosis of HES, including the classification by clinical HES subtype. Treatment options are reviewed, including novel eosinophil-targeted agents recently approved for the treatment of HES and/or other eosinophil-associated disorders. Primary (myeloid) disorders associated with hypereosinophilia are not be addressed in depth in this review.