Inappropriate repeat testing of complete blood count (CBC) and electrolyte panels in inpatients from Alberta, Canada

Targeting repetitive laboratory testing with electronic health records-embedded predictive decision support: A pre-implementation study

INTRODUCTION

Unnecessary laboratory testing contributes to patient morbidity and healthcare waste. Despite prior attempts at curbing such overutilization, there remains opportunity for improvement using novel data-driven approaches. This study presents the development and early evaluation of a clinical decision support tool that uses a predictive model to help providers reduce low-yield, repetitive laboratory testing in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We developed an EHR-embedded SMART on FHIR application that utilizes a laboratory test result prediction model based on historical laboratory data. A combination of semi-structured physician interviews, usability testing, and quantitative analysis on retrospective laboratory data were used to inform the tool's development and evaluate its acceptability and potential clinical impact.

KEY RESULTS

Physicians identified culture and lack of awareness of repeat orders as key drivers for overuse of inpatient blood testing. Users expressed an openness to a lab prediction model and 13/15 physicians believed the tool would alter their ordering practices. The application received a median System Usability Scale score of 75, corresponding to the 75th percentile of software tools. On average, physicians desired a prediction certainty of 85% before discontinuing a routine recurring laboratory order and a higher certainty of 90% before being alerted. Simulation on historical lab data indicates that filtering based on accepted thresholds could have reduced ∼22% of repeat chemistry panels.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a predictive algorithm as a means to calculate the utility of a diagnostic test is a promising paradigm for curbing laboratory test overutilization. An EHR-embedded clinical decision support tool employing such a model is a novel and acceptable intervention with the potential to reduce low-yield, repetitive laboratory testing.

Choosing which in-hospital laboratory tests to target for intervention: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Some laboratory testing practices may be of low value, leading to wasted resources and potential patient harm. Our scoping review investigated factors and processes that developers report using to inform decisions about what tests to target for practice improvement.

METHODS

We searched Medline on May 30th, 2019 and June 28th, 2021 and included guidelines, recommendation statements, or empirical studies related to test ordering practices. Studies were included if they were conducted in a tertiary care setting, reported making a choice about a specific test requiring intervention, and reported at least one factor informing that choice. We extracted descriptive details, tests chosen, processes used to make the choice, and factors guiding test choice.

RESULTS

From 114 eligible studies, we identified 30 factors related to test choice including clinical value, cost, prevalence of test, quality of test, and actionability of test results. We identified nine different processes used to inform decisions regarding where to spend intervention resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention developers face difficult choices when deciding where to put scarce resources intended to improve test utilization. Factors and processes identified here can be used to inform a framework to help intervention developers make choices relevant to improving testing practices.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Requesting a Complete Blood Count (CBC) in the Management of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia

Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, studies have attempted to determine the value of the different laboratory investigations. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of requesting a complete blood count (CBC) for COVID-19 patients, as opposed to ordering a COVID-19 antibody titer in Saudi Arabia. Methods: The prices of a CBC, COVID-19 PCR, and antibody titer were obtained from 40 healthcare establishments in Saudi Arabia, between January and February 2022. Results: Requesting a CBC is significantly cheaper than requesting a COVID-19 antibody titer, which was available in almost all of the establishments, as compared to COVID-19 PCR and antibody titer testing. The investigation prices did not differ significantly between hospitals and private laboratories, nor across cities in Saudi Arabia. Conclusions: CBC, which provides valuable information on the patient’s condition and prognosis, is a cost-effective and widely available tool for managing COVID-19. The price and availability of CBC warrant it to be included in the COVID-19 management protocols.

Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review

Background:

Inappropriate health care leads to negative patient experiences, poor health outcomes and inefficient use of resources. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of inappropriately used clinical practices in Canada.

Methods:

We searched multiple bibliometric databases and grey literature to identify inappropriately used clinical practices in Canada between 2007 and 2021. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Findings were synthesized in 2 categories: diagnostics and therapeutics. We reported ranges of proportions of inappropriate use for all practices. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), based on the percentage of patients not receiving recommended practices (underuse) or receiving practices not recommended (overuse), were calculated. All statistics are at the study summary level.

Results:

We included 174 studies, representing 228 clinical practices and 28 900 762 patients. The median proportion of inappropriate care, as assessed in the studies, was 30.0% (IQR 12.0%–56.6%). Underuse (median 43.9%, IQR 23.8%–66.3%) was more frequent than overuse (median 13.6%, IQR 3.2%–30.7%). The most frequently investigated diagnostics were glycated hemoglobin (underused, range 18.0%–85.7%, n = 9) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (overused, range 3.0%–35.1%, n = 5). The most frequently investigated therapeutics were statin medications (underused, range 18.5%–71.0%, n = 6) and potentially inappropriate medications (overused, range 13.5%–97.3%, n = 9).

Interpretation:

We have provided a summary of inappropriately used clinical practices in Canadian health care systems. Our findings can be used to support health care professionals and quality agencies to improve patient care and safety in Canada.

The life of a laboratory requisition form: Patient compliance with clinical laboratory testing in a Canadian primary care health region

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient laboratory testing compliance by tracking time to submission of laboratory requisitions in Southern Alberta, Canada as part of a quality improvement initiative.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from patients from the Chinook Primary Care Network in Alberta, Canada, who received a laboratory requisition consisting of a complete blood count (CBC) test order between September 1, 2016 and August 31, 2017. To allow for all laboratory requisitions created to be submitted within one year, the study collection period was from September 1, 2016 to August 31, 2018. Patient age, sex, and dates of laboratory requisition creation and submission were collected. The days-to-test-submission served as a marker of compliance. Association of age, sex, and clinic location with time to laboratory requisition completion was determined using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, 70.4% (n = 1607) of laboratory requisitions created were completed within one year, and over half (50.5%) of the laboratory requisitions ordered were completed within two weeks. There were no significant associations between time to laboratory requisition submission and sex or clinic locations (P > 0.05), but there were significant associations between patients who were 20-49 or 70-79 and increased laboratory requisition compliance (P < 0.05). However, 26.0% of the laboratory requisitions created were not submitted at all.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study that quantified the proportion and timing of laboratory requisitions that were submitted by patients in a primary care setting. Community patients should be engaged and educated regarding the importance of complying with their physician-ordered laboratory requests in a timely manner.

Factors Associated with Hyponatremia in Patients Newly Prescribed Citalopram: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Hyponatremia is a common and under-recognized adverse drug reaction of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. Despite its clinical importance, there are few large-scale studies on the factors associated with hyponatremia.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of hyponatremia and to identify patient factors associated with hyponatremia in a large, population-based cohort initiating new prescriptions for citalopram.

Methods

We included all patients with a new prescription for citalopram during 2010–2017, inclusive, with baseline and post-initiation serum sodium values available. Data were obtained from an Alberta Health Pharmacy database to identify new citalopram prescriptions. Laboratory values for patients with new prescriptions were obtained from linked Calgary Laboratory Services data. Incident hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level < 135 mmol/L, following prescription initiation. Associations were determined by performing Cox regression with time-varying covariate analysis, with the development of hyponatremia as the dependent variable.

Results

A total of 19,679 patients with new prescriptions were identified; 12,842 females and 6837 males. The mean age was 55.48 years (SD 21.35). Of these patients, 3250 (16.5%) developed hyponatremia, 1996 (15.5% of) females and 1254 (18.3% of) males (p = 0.002). Cox regression showed significant associations of hyponatremia with lower baseline sodium (HR 0.788), older age (HR 1.029), thiazide diuretic use (HR 1.141), and male sex (HR 1.168). Pharmaceutical manufacturer or strength of citalopram did not have significant effects on the development of hyponatremia.

Conclusion

This study provides additional data on the predictors of hyponatremia among patients initiating citalopram therapy. We report a 16.5% incidence of hyponatremia after starting citalopram treatment, and significant new findings include a higher incidence in males. This is the first published incidence of hyponatremia following the initiation of citalopram treatment across all ages in Canada.

Overutilization in laboratory medicine: tackling the problem with quality improvement science

Overutilization of tests and treatments is a widespread problem in contemporary heath care, and laboratory medicine is no exception. It is estimated that 10-70% of laboratory tests may be unnecessary, with estimates in the literature varying depending on the situation and the laboratory test. Inappropriate use of laboratory tests can lead to further unnecessary testing, adverse events, inaccurate diagnoses, and inappropriate treatments. Altogether, this increases the risk of harm to a patient, which can be physical, psychological, or financial in nature. Overutilization in healthcare is driven by complex factors including care delivery models, litigious practice environments, and medical and patient culture. Quality improvement (QI) methods can help to tackle overutilization. In this review, we outline the global healthcare problem of laboratory overutilization, particularly in the developed world, and describe how an understanding of and application of quality improvement principles can help to address this challenge.

Trends of utilization of Complete Blood Count parameters for patient management among doctors in Azad Kashmir

Objective:

To determine the trends of utilization of CBC parameters in patient management among doctors in different hospitals in Kashmir, Pakistan.

Methodd:

A self-administered questionnaire-based survey was carried out amongst doctors working in four hospitals of Kashmir i.e. Combined Military Hospital, Muzaffarabad, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalakot, Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad, and District Hospital, Kotli during August to December 2017.

Results:

Out of 500 physicians, 217 physicians answered the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 43.4%. Only three of the 11 parameters in the CBC report i.e. hemoglobin, white blood cell count and platelets were selected as frequently or always useful by more than 80% of physicians. Rest of the eight parameters of the CBC were found useful by less than 80% of the physicians. Most agreed that the current format of a CBC report gives adequate information.

Conclusion:

The present study concludes that majority of the physicians utilize only three of the basic parameters on the complete blood count. An educational intervention can be planned for the physicians to increase their knowledge about the utility of other parameters.

Dataset of test volume and tests repeated for complete blood count and electrolyte panels from hospitals in a Canadian province in 2018

All laboratory tests performed within the province of Alberta in Canada are captured by three Laboratory Information Systems (LIS; Millennium, Sunquest and Meditech), which comprise the provincial Consolidated Laboratory Data Repository (CLDR). The following secondary laboratory data for electrolyte panel (EP) and complete blood count (CBC) test panels performed in emergency room (ER) and inpatient settings were collected from January 1 – December 31, 2018: total test panel volume, total number of test panels repeated, number of test panels repeated within the 24 hour period, test result, date of testing, time of test, and patient Provincial Health Number (PHN). Patient PHN were used as a linking variable to match subsequent tests performed on the same patient. The first time a test was recorded per patient was defined as the “index test”. If the same test panel was performed within a 24-h period following the index test for the patient, data for the repeated test panel was also collected. The index test was defined as “normal” or “abnormal” according to established laboratory normal values and laboratory test reference ranges. For CBCs, we considered the panel to be abnormal if any of the hematocrit (Hct), hemoglobin (Hgb), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelet (PLT), red blood cell (RBC), red cell distribution width (RDW) or white blood cell (WBC) values were outside the normal laboratory reference range. For electrolyte panels, we considered the panel to be abnormal if any of the chloride (Cl), potassium (K), and sodium (Na) were outside of the normal laboratory reference range. All EP results were from clinical chemistry analyzers only. The reuse potential of this dataset can allow other jurisdictions in Canada to compare their redundant repeat testing in their hospital settings with this dataset as a benchmark. This article was submitted via another Elsevier journal as a co-submission (“Inappropriate repeat testing of complete blood count (CBC) and electrolytes in inpatients from Alberta, Canada” [1]), and readers should refer to the co-submission article for interpretation of the results.