Biomechanical assessment of the stabilization capacity of monolithic spinal rods with different flexural stiffness and anchoring arrangement

Topping-Off a Long Thoracic Stabilization With Semi-Rigid Constructs May Have Favorable Biomechanical Effects to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Biomechanical Comparison

Study DesignIn-vitro cadaveric biomechanical study.ObjectivesLong posterior spinal fusion is a standard treatment for adult spinal deformity. However, these rigid constructs are known to alter motion and stress to the adjacent non-instrumented vertebrae, increasing the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). This study aimed to biomechanically compare a standard rigid construct vs constructs "topped off" with a semi-rigid construct. By understanding semi-rigid constructs' effect on motion and overall construct stiffness, surgeons and researchers could better optimize fusion constructs to potentially decrease the risk of PJK and the need for revision surgery.MethodsNine human cadaveric spines (T1-T12) underwent non-destructive biomechanical range of motion tests in pure bending or torsion and were instrumented with an all-pedicle-screw (APS) construct from T6-T9. The specimens were sequentially instrumented with semi-rigid constructs at T5: (i) APS plus sublaminar bands; (ii) APS plus supralaminar hooks; (iii) APS plus transverse process hooks; and (iv) APS plus short pedicle screws.ResultsAPS plus transverse process hooks had a range of motion (ie, relative angle) for T4-T5 and T5-T6, as well as an overall mechanical stiffness for T1-T12, that was more favourable, as it reduced motion at adjacent levels without a stark increase in stiffness. Moreover, APS plus transverse process hooks had the most linear change for range of motion across the entire T3-T7 range.ConclusionsPresent findings suggest that APS plus transverse process hooks has a favourable biomechanical effect that may reduce PJK for long spinal fusions compared to the other constructs examined.

Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare motions at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent level (UIV+1) between two fixation techniques in thoracic posterior spinal fusion constructs. We hypothesized there would be greater motion at UIV+1 after cyclic loading across all constructs and bilateral pedicle screws (BPSs) with posterior ligamentous compromise would demonstrate the greatest UIV+1 range of motion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Proximal junctional kyphosis is a well-recognized complication following long thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion, however, its mechanism is poorly understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven thoracic functional spine units were randomly divided into three UIV fixation groups (n=9): (1) BPS, (2) bilateral transverse process hooks (TPHs), and (3) BPS with compromise of the posterior elements between UIV and UIV+1 (BPS-C). Specimens were tested on a servohydraulic materials testing system in native state, following instrumentation, and after cyclic loading. functional spine units were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

After cyclic testing, the TPH group had a mean 29.4% increase in FE range of motion at UIV+1 versus 76.6% in the BPS group ( P <0.05). The BPS-C group showed an increased FE of 49.9% and 62.19% with sectioning of the facet joints and interspinous ligament respectively prior to cyclic testing.

CONCLUSION

BPSs at the UIV led to greater motion at UIV+1 compared to bilateral TPH after cyclic loading. This is likely due to the increased rigidity of BPS compared to TPH leading to a "softer" transition between the TPH construct and native anatomy at the supra-adjacent level. Facet capsule compromise led to a 49.9% increase in UIV+1 motion, underscoring the importance of preserving the posterior ligamentous complex. Clinical studies that account for fusion rates are warranted to determine if constructs with a "soft transition" result in less proximal junctional kyphosis in vivo .

Proximal junctional failure after surgical instrumentation in adult spinal deformity: biomechanical assessment of proximal instrumentation stiffness

STUDY DESIGN

Assessment of different proximal instrumentation stiffness features to minimize the mechanical proximal junctional failure-related risks through computer-based biomechanical models.

OBJECTIVE

To biomechanically assess variations of proximal instrumentation and loads acting on the spine and construct to minimize proximal junctional failure (PJF) risks. The use of less-stiff fixation such as hooks or tensioned bands, compared to pedicle screws, at the proximal instrumentation level are considered to allow for a gradual transition in stiffness with the adjacent levels, but the impact of such flexible fixation on the loads balance and complications such as PJF remain uncertain.

METHODS

Six patients with adult spine deformity who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation were used to numerically model and simulate the surgical steps, erected posture, and flexion functional loading in patient-specific multibody analyses. Three types of upper-level fixation (pedicle screws (PS), supralaminar hooks (SH), and sublaminar bands (SB) with tensions of 50, 250, and 350 N) and rod stiffness (CoCr/6 mm, CoCr/5.5 mm, Ti/5.5 mm) were simulated. The loads acting on the spine and implants of the 90 simulated configurations were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests.

RESULTS

Simulated high-tensioned bands decreased the sagittal moment at the adjacent level proximal to the instrumentation (1.3 Nm at 250 N; 2.5 Nm at 350 N) compared to screws alone (PS) (15.6 Nm). At one level above, the high-tensioned SB increased the sagittal moment (17.7 Nm-SB vs. 15.5 Nm-PS) and bending moment on the rods (5.4 Nm and 5.7 Nm vs. 0.6 Nm) (p < 0.05). SB with 50 N tension yielded smaller changes in load transition compared to higher tension, with moments of 8.1 Nm and 16.8 Nm one and two levels above the instrumentation. The sagittal moment at the upper implant-vertebra connection decreased with the rod stiffness (1.0 Nm for CoCr/6 mm vs. 0.7 Nm for Ti/5.5 mm; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Simulated sublaminar bands with lower tension produced smaller changes in the load transition across proximal junctional levels. Decreasing the rod stiffness further modified these changes, with a decrease in loads associated with bone failure, however, lower stiffness did increase the rod breakage risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Semi-rigid Junctional Fixation Using a Novel Cable Anchor System to Prevent Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A porcine cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To biomechanically evaluate a novel Cable Anchor System as semi-rigid junctional fixation technique for the prevention of proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery and to make a comparison to alternative promising prophylactic techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The abrupt change of stiffness at the proximal end of a pedicle screw construct is a major risk factor for the development of proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery. A number of techniques that aim to provide a gradual transition zone in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal junction have previously been studied. In this study, the design of a novel Cable Anchor System, which comprises a polyethylene cable for rod fixation, is assessed.

METHODS

Ten T6-T13 porcine spine segments were subjected to cyclic 4 Nm pure-moment loading. The following conditions were tested: uninstrumented, 3 level pedicle screw fixation (PSF), and PSF with supplementary Cable Anchors applied proximally at 1-level (Anchor1) or 2-levels (Anchor2), transverse process hooks (TPH), and 2-level sublaminar tapes (Tape2). The normalized segmental range of motion in the junctional zone was compared using one-way analysis of variance and linear regression.

RESULTS

Statistical comparison at the level proximal to PSF showed significantly lower ROMs for all techniques compared to PSF fixation alone in all movement directions. Linear regression demonstrated a higher linearity for Anchor1 (0.820) and Anchor2 (0.923) in the junctional zone in comparison to PSF (1-level: 0.529 and 2-level: 0.421). This linearity was similar to the compared techniques (TPH and Tape2).

CONCLUSION

The Cable Anchor System presented in this study demonstrated a gradual ROM transition zone at the proximal end of a rigid pedicle screw construct similar to TPH and 2-level sublaminar tape semi-rigid junctional fixation constructs, while providing the benefit of preserving the posterior ligament complex.Level of Evidence: 5.

Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared.

PURPOSE

To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or "topping-off," between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical cadaveric study.

METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8-L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11-L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

All techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2.

CONCLUSIONS

All studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into the clinical goal of reducing the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The direct biomechanical comparison of multiple instrumentation techniques that aim to reduce the incidence of PJK after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery provides a basis upon which clinical studies could be designed. Furthermore, the data provided in this study can be used to further analyze the biomechanical effects of the studied techniques using finite element models to better predict their post-operative effectiveness.

Instrumentation techniques to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure in adult spinal deformity correction-a systematic review of biomechanical studies

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) by long segment instrumented spinal fusion is an increasingly common surgical intervention. However, it is associated with high rates of complications and revision surgery, especially in the elderly patient population. The high construct stiffness of instrumented thoracolumbar spinal fusion has been postulated to lead to a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). Several cadaveric biomechanical studies have reported on surgical techniques to reduce the incidence of PJF/PJK. As yet, no overview has been made of these biomechanical studies.

PURPOSE

To summarize the evidence of all biomechanical studies that have assessed techniques to reduce PJK/PJF following long segment instrumented spinal fusion in the ASD patient population.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched for human and animal cadaveric biomechanical studies investigating the effect of various surgical techniques to reduce PJK/PJF following long segment instrumented thoracolumbar spinal fusion in the adult patient population. Studied techniques, biomechanical test methods, range of motion (ROM), intervertebral disc pressure (IDP) and other relevant outcome parameters were documented.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Four of these studies included non-human cadaveric material. One study investigated the prophylactic application of cement augmentation (vertebroplasty), whereas the remaining studies investigated semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques to achieve a gradual transition zone of forces at the proximal end of a fusion construct, so-called topping-off. An increased gradual transition zone in terms of ROM compared to pedicle screw constructs was demonstrated for sublaminar tethers, sublaminar tape, pretensioned suture loops, transverse hooks and laminar hooks. Furthermore, reduced IDP was found after the application of sublaminar tethers, suture loops, sublaminar tapes and laminar hooks. Finally, two-level prophylactic vertebroplasty resulted in a lower incidence of vertebral compression fractures in a flexion-compression experiment.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of techniques, involving either posterior semi-rigid junctional fixation or the reinforcement of vertebral bodies, has been biomechanically assessed. However, the low number of studies and variation in study protocols hampers direct comparison of different techniques. Furthermore, determination of what constitutes an optimal gradual transition zone and its translation to clinical practice, would aid comparison and further development of different semi-rigid junctional fixation techniques. Even though biomechanics are extremely important in the development of PJK/PJF, patient-specific factors should always be taken into account on a case-by-case basis when considering to apply a semi-rigid junctional fixation technique.

Comparison of Long Segmental Dorsal Stabilization with Complete Versus Restricted Pedicle Screw Cement Augmentation in Unstable Osteoporotic Midthoracic Vertebral Body Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the construct stability of long-segmental dorsal stabilization in unstable midthoracic osteoporotic fracture situation with complete pedicle screw cement augmentation (ComPSCA) versus restricted pedicle screw cement augmentation (ResPSCA) of the most cranial and caudal pedicle screws.

METHODS

Twelve fresh frozen human cadaveric specimens (Th 4-Th 10) aged 65 years and older were tested in a biomechanical cadaver study. All specimens received a dual-energy X-ray absorption scan and computed tomography scan before testing. Standardized long segmental stabilization was performed. All specimens were matched into pairs. These pairs were randomized into the groups with ComPSCA and ResPSCA. An unstable Th7 fracture was simulated. The maximum load was tested with 6 mm/min until failure or 20 mm had been reached. After testing, a computed tomography scan was performed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the specimens was 87.8 years (range 74-101 years). The mean t score was -3.6 (range -1.2 to -5.3). The mean maximum force in the ResPSCA group was 1600 N (range 1119-1880 N) and 1941 N (1183-3761 N) in the ComPSCA group. No statistically significant differences between both study groups (P = 1.0) could be seen. No signs of screw loosening were visible.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences in the maximum loads could be seen. No screw loosening of the non-cemented screws was visible. Thus, the construct stability of long segmental posterior stabilization of an unstable midthoracic fracture using ResPSCA seems to be comparable with ComPSCA under axial compression.

Posterior bone graft in lumbar spine surgery reduces the stress in the screw-rod system- A finite element study

PURPOSE

Analyze the biomechanical effect of postero-lateral instrumentation with and without posterior bone graft as well as effect of consolidation of the graft. Study objectives are (1) whether bone graft alone will provide enough additional strength to the weakened spine, (2) how the addition of posterior bone graft help in extending the life of the fusion construct, and (3) compare the effect of gradual consolidation of the bone-graft on the spine biomechanics.

METHODS

A lumbar spine finite element model was used to analyze the effects of bone-graft alone and varying grades of bone-graft consolidation with postero-lateral instrumentation on spine biomechanics. The spine stiffness and stresses in the posterior rods and screws were determined for moments applied in the three physiological directions in addition to pre-load.

RESULTS

Stiffness of a normal lumbar spine with a solid consolidated posterior bone graft was found to be 10 times that of an intact lumbar spine. Posterior instrumentation further increased the spine stiffness by 20 fold. A 50% solid consolidation of the graft reduced the screw-rod maximum von-Mises stress by 45% and a 65% reduction in screw-rod stress was calculated with completely fused graft.

CONCLUSION

A fused graft with posterior instrumentation provided a 200 fold increase in stiffness of an intact spine while producing stress shielding to the Ti rod-screw system. Considerable reduction of the maximum von-Mises stresses in the postero-lateral rod and screw fusion system (65%) will contribute to prevention of implant failure under repetitive loading highlighting the importance of consolidation of posterior bone-graft.

Biomechanical analysis of spinal implants with different rod diameters under static and fatigue loads: an experimental study

Spinal implants are commonly used in the treatment of spinal disorders or injuries. However, the biomechanical analyses of them are rarely investigated in terms of both biomechanical and clinical perspectives. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of rod diameter on the biomechanical behavior of spinal implants and to make a comparison among them. For this purpose, three spinal implants composed of pedicle screws, setscrews and rods, which were manufactured from Ti6Al4V, with diameters of 5.5 mm, 6 mm and 6.35 mm were used and a bilateral vertebrectomy model was applied to spinal systems. Then, the obtained spinal systems were tested under static tension-compression and fatigue (dynamic compression) conditions. Also, failure analyses were performed to investigate the fatigue behavior of spinal implants. After static tension-compression and fatigue tests, it was found that the yield loads, stiffness values, load carrying capacities and fatigue performances of spinal implants enhanced with increasing spinal rod diameter. In comparison to spinal implants with 5.5 mm rods, the fatigue limits of implants showed 13% and 33% improvements in spinal implants having 6 mm and 6.35 mm rods, respectively. The highest static and fatigue test results were obtained from spinal implants having 6.35 mm rods among the tested implants. Also, it was observed that the increasing yield load and stiffness values caused an increase in the fatigue limits of spinal implants.

Choice of Rods in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Clinical Implications of Biomechanical Properties? - A Review of the Literature

The surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) involves 3-dimensional curve correction with multisegmental pedicle screws attached to contoured bilateral rods. The substantial corrective forces exert a high level of stress on the rods, and the ability of the rod to withstand these forces without undergoing permanent deformation relies on its biomechanical properties. These properties, in turn, are dependent on the material, diameter, and shape of the rod. The surgical treatment of AIS is characterized by the requirement for a special biomechanical profile that may differ substantially from what is needed for adult deformity surgery. This overview summarizes the current knowledge of rod biomechanics in frequently used rod constructs, with a particular focus on translational research between biomechanical studies and clinical applicability in AIS patients.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Long-Segment Fusion in a Lumbar Spine—A Finite Element Model Study

Examine the biomechanical effect of material properties, geometric variables, and anchoring arrangements in a segmental pedicle screw with connecting rods spanning the entire lumbar spine using finite element models (FEMs). The objectives of this study are (1) to understand how different variables associated with posterior instrumentation affect the lumbar spine kinematics and stresses in instrumentation, (2) to compare the multidirectional stability of the spinal instrumentation, and (3) to determine how these variables contribute to the rigidity of the long-segment fusion in a lumbar spine. A lumbar spine FEM was used to analyze the biomechanical effects of different materials used for spinal rods (TNTZ or Ti or CoCr), varying diameters of the screws and rods (5 mm and 6 mm), and different fixation techniques (multilevel or intermittent). The results based on the range of motion and stress distribution in the rods and screws revealed that differences in properties and variations in geometry of the screw-rod moderately affect the biomechanics of the spine. Further, the spinal screw-rod system was least stable under the lateral bending mode. Stress analyzes of the screws and rods revealed that the caudal section of the posterior spinal instrumentation was more susceptible to high stresses and hence possible failure. Although CoCr screws and rods provided the greatest spinal stabilization, these constructs were susceptible to fatigue failure. The findings of the present study suggest that a posterior instrumentation system with a 5-mm screw-rod diameter made of Ti or TNTZ is advantageous over CoCr instrumentation system.

Impact of spinal rod stiffness on porcine lumbar biomechanics: Finite element model validation and parametric study

A three-dimensional finite element model of the porcine lumbar spine (L1-L6) was used to assess the effect of spinal rod stiffness on lumbar biomechanics. The model was validated through a comparison with in vitro measurements performed on six porcine spine specimens. The validation metrics employed included intervertebral rotations and the nucleus pressure in the first instrumented intervertebral disc. The numerical results obtained suggest that rod stiffness values as low as 0.1 GPa are required to reduce the mobility gradient between the adjacent and instrumented segments and the nucleus pressures across the porcine lumbar spine significantly. Stiffness variations above this threshold value have no significant effect on spine biomechanics. For such low-stiffness rods, intervertebral rotations in the instrumented zone must be monitored closely in order to guarantee solid fusion. Looking ahead, the proposed model will serve to examine the transverse process hooks and variable stiffness rods in order to further smooth the transition between the adjacent and instrumented segments, while preserving the stability of the instrumented zone, which is needed for fusion.

Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a challenging complication after rigid posterior instrumentation (RI) of the spine. Several risk factors have been described in literature so far, including the rigidity of the cranial aspect of the implant.

PURPOSE

The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare different proximal implants designed to gradually reduce the stiffness between the instrumented and non-instrumented spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a biomechanical study.

METHODS

Eight calf lumbar spines (L2-L6) underwent RI with a titanium pedicle screw rod construct at L4-L6. The proximal transition segment (L3-L4) was instrumented stepwise with different supplementary implants-spinal bands (SB), cerclage wires (CW), hybrid rods (HR), hinged pedicle screws (HPS), or lamina hooks (LH)-and compared with an all-pedicle screw construct (APS). The flexibility of each segment (L2-L6) was tested with pure moments of ±10.0 Nm in the native state and for each implant at L3-L4, and the segmental range of motion (ROM) was evaluated.

RESULTS

On flexion and extension, the native uninstrumented L3-L4 segment showed a mean ROM of 7.3°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 42.5%, SB to 41.1%, HR to 13.7%, HPS to 12.3%, LH to 6.8%, and APS to 12.3%. On lateral bending, the native segment L3-L4 showed a mean ROM of 15°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 58.0%, SB to 78.0%, HR to 6.7%, HPS to 6.7%, LH to 10.0%, and APS to 3.3%. On axial rotation, the uninstrumented L3-L4 segment showed a mean ROM of 2.7°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 55.6%, SB to 77.8%, HR to 55.6%, HPS to 55.6%, LH to 29.6%, and APS to 37.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CW or SB at the proximal transition segment of a long RI reduced rigidity by about 60% in relation to flexion and extension in that segment, whereas the other implants tested had a high degree of rigidity comparable with APS. Clinical randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate whether this strategy might be effective for preventing PJK.

Impact of anchor type on porcine lumbar biomechanics: Finite element modelling and in-vitro validation

BACKGROUND

Rigid posterior implants used for spinal stabilization can be anchored to the vertebrae using pedicle screws or screws combined with transverse process hooks. In the present study, a finite element model of a porcine lumbar spine instrumented with screws and hooks is presented and validated.

METHODS

The porcine lumbar spine model was validated using in-vitro measurements on six porcine specimens. Validation metrics included intervertebral rotations (L1 to L6) and nucleus pressure in the topmost cranial instrumented disc. The model was used to compare the biomechanical effect of anchor types.

FINDINGS

Good agreement was observed between the model and validation experiments. For upper transverse hooks construct, intervertebral rotations increased at the upper instrumented vertebra and decreased at the adjacent level. Additionally, nucleus pressures and stress on the annulus decreased in the adjacent disc and increased in the upper instrumented disc. The pull-out forces predicted for both anchor configurations were significantly lower than the pull-out strength found in the literature.

INTERPRETATION

These numerical observations suggest that upper transverse process hooks constructs reduce the mobility gradient and cause less stress in the adjacent disc, which could potentially reduce adjacent segment disease and proximal junction kyphosis incidence without increasing the risk of fixation failure. Future work needs to assess the long-term effect of such constructs on clinical and functional outcomes.