Pros and cons of a minimally invasive percutaneous subdural drainage system for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma under local anesthesia

Letter to editor : Local anesthesia with sedation and general anesthesia for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of published cases

This critique evaluates the systematic review and meta-analysis titled "Local anesthesia with sedation and general anesthesia for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma." The study provides valuable insights into anesthesia techniques' effectiveness in managing this condition but has limitations, including selection bias, heterogeneity among cases, lack of standardized protocols, and retrospective design. Despite these limitations, the review contributes to understanding chronic subdural hematoma management but underscores the need for future research to address these shortcomings.

Local anesthesia with sedation and general anesthesia for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the primary treatment for chronic subdural hematoma, and anesthesia significantly impacts the surgery's outcomes. A previous systematic review compared general anesthesia to local anesthesia in 319 patients. Our study builds upon this research, analyzing 4,367 cases to provide updated and rigorous evidence.

METHODS

We systematically searched five electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science, to identify eligible comparative studies. All studies published until September 2023 were included in our analysis. We compared six primary outcomes between the two groups using Review Manager Software.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving a total of 4,367 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of 'recurrence rate' (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.78 to 1.15], P = 0.59), 'mortality rate' (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.55 to 1.88], P = 0.96), and 'reoperation rate' (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.5 to 1.79], P = 0.87). Local anesthesia demonstrated superiority with a lower 'complications rate' than general anesthesia, as the latter had almost 2.4 times higher odds of experiencing complications (OR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.81 to 3.17], P < 0.00001). Additionally, local anesthesia was associated with a shorter 'length of hospital stay' (SMD = 1.19, 95% CI [1.06 to 1.32], P < 0.00001) and a reduced 'duration of surgery' (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.67 to 1.2], P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery for chronic subdural hematoma under local anesthesia results in fewer complications, a shorter length of hospital stay, and a shorter duration of the operation.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage under Local versus General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most frequently encountered neurosurgical conditions. Although the mainstay treatment of chronic subdural hematoma has been burr-hole drainage, no consensus yet exists on the optimal anesthetic strategy between general anesthesia (GA) and local anesthesia (LA). This systematic review compares postoperative outcomes after CSDH evacuation under LA and GA.

METHODS

A search was conducted in MEDLINE (1946 to November 2023), Embase (1974 to November 2023), and PubMed (up to November 2023). We followed the PRISMA guidelines to systematically screen studies.

RESULTS

Our literature search identified 629 studies, out of which 12 were included. There were 1035 patients in the LA group and 699 patients in the GA group. Our meta-analysis found that the LA group had significantly shorter operative time (mean difference, -29.28 minutes; P < 0.0001), length of admission (mean difference, -1.58 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.40 to -0.76 days; P = 0.0002), and postoperative complications rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59; P < 0.0001) compared with GA. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in revision rate (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.39-1.51; P = 0.45) and mortality (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.63-2.43; P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, LA shows benefits in shorter operative time, shorter admission length, and fewer postoperative complications. This finding makes LA a less invasive alternative to GA, especially in elderly patients.

Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The optimal anesthetic technique for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still uncertain. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if local anesthesia with or without sedation (LA) or general anesthesia (GA) results in better outcomes for surgical drainage of CSDH.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective studies that compared GA vs LA for adult patients undergoing surgical drainage of CSDH and reported at least one outcome of interest. Primary outcomes of interest included total duration of surgery, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative adverse events, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies (1,542 patients; 926 LA; 616 GA) were included-two were RCTs and six were observational studies. Pooling the estimates of all available studies, we found that LA was associated with a decreased mean LOS by about two days (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.47 to -0.77; P = 0.01; low certainty of evidence) as well as a lower risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.58; P = 0.004; very low certainty of evidence). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of surgery, recurrence rate, intraoperative adverse events, or mortality. The quality of the observational studies was poor to fair, largely because of heterogeneity among the studies. Among the RCTs, one had a low risk of bias and one was deemed to be at high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthesia with/without sedation for surgical drainage of CSDH may be associated with a shorter LOS, and lower postoperative complications. As most of our included studies were observational in nature, our results should be interpreted as summaries of unadjusted group comparisons. In view of the low certainty of evidence, higher quality evidence is required to corroborate these findings.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022333388); first submitted 1 June 2022.

Awake transradial middle meningeal artery embolization and twist drill craniostomy for chronic subdural hematomas in the elderly: case series and technical note

BACKGROUND

Due to prohibitive perioperative risk factors, optimal treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) in the elderly remains unclear. Minimally invasive techniques are a viable option and include bedside subdural evacuation port system (SEPS), as well as prevention of recurrence with middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. We present a case series of elderly patients undergoing combined transradial MMA embolization and bed-side craniostomy as primary treatment for cSDH.

METHODS

Patients 70 years and older from 2019 to 2020 that underwent single setting, awake transradial MMA embolization with concurrent SEPS placement under local anesthesia were included. Those with prior treatments, interventions performed under general anesthesia, or with less than 60-day follow-up were excluded. Descriptive analyses of baseline characteristics, radiologic parameters, comorbidities, and outcome measures were completed.

RESULTS

Twenty elderly patients (mean age of 81.0 years) with multiple comorbidities underwent 28 MMA embolization+SEPS procedures as primary treatment for cSDH. Mean cSDH thickness was 1.8cm±0.6 cm with 7.3±3.9 mm midline shift. All patients tolerated the procedure well. 1/20 (5.0%) patients died within 30 days of the procedure. A majority of patients were discharged to home (12/20; 60.0%). There was an average of 3.6-month follow-up and one patient (5.0%) developed recurrence in the follow-up period requiring further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

In select elderly patients with high perioperative risk factors, primary treatment of cSDH using awake transradial MMA embolization+SEPS placement is a minimally invasive, feasible, and safe option. Further comparative studies are warranted to evaluate efficacy of the treatment.

Comparison of Burr-Hole Craniostomy versus Twist-Drill Craniostomy Operations for Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) represents one of the most common neurologic disorders in the elderly. However, the optimum surgical option remains questionable. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of single burr-hole craniostomy (sBHC), double burr-hole craniostomy (dBHC), and twist-drill craniostomy (TDC) in patients with CSDH.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science until October 2022 for prospective trials. Primary outcomes comprised recurrence and mortality. The analysis was performed using R software, and the results were reported as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Data from 11 prospective clinical trials were included in this network meta-analysis. We found that dBHC significantly decreased recurrence and reoperation rates compared with TDC (RR = 0.55, CI, 0.33-0.90 and RR = 0.48, CI, 0.24-0.94, respectively). However, sBHC showed no difference compared with dBHC and TDC. There was no significant difference among dBHC, sBHC, and TDC regarding the hospitalization duration, complication rates, mortality, and cured rates.

CONCLUSIONS

dBHC seems to be the best modality for CSDH compared with sBHC and TDC. It showed significantly less recurrence and reoperation rates compared with TDC. On the other hand, dBHC showed no significant difference with the other comparators regarding complication, mortality, and cure rates in addition to the hospitalization duration.

Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is a clinical equipoise between burr hole drainage (BHD) or twist drill craniotomy (TDC) as initial surgical intervention in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Moreover, the impact of type of postoperative drainage is not well elucidated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes following BHD and TDC for initial surgical management in cSDH and to understand the impact of negative suction drainage with TDC.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for studies that directly compared TDC and BHD. The following outcomes were compared between TDC and BHD: mortality, recurrence, reoperations, complications, and cure rates. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine impact of negative suction drainage with TDC.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles (n = 1,235; TDC: 663; BHD: 591) met inclusion criteria. Although complications (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.38-1.23, p = 0.21; I² = 31%), recurrence (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.62, p = 0.37; I² = 28%), cure (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.72-1.72, p = 0.64, I² = 34%), and mortality rates (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.60-2.41; p = 0.61; I² = 0%) were not significantly different between the two groups, TDC was associated with a higher reoperations than BHD (OR: 1.48, 95% CI:1.01-2.16, p = 0.04; I² = 41%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that TDC with negative suction drainage conferred equivalent reoperation rates as BHD (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.24-2.35; p = 0.62; I² = 65%); however, TDC without negative suction was associated with higher reoperations (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08-2.42; p = 0.02; I² = 40%).

CONCLUSION

A systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature directly comparing TDC and BHD for primary evacuation of cSDH did not demonstrate clear superiority of either technique, although reoperations may be higher following TDC. Use of negative suction drainage with TDC may lead to similar rates of reoperation as BHD.

Awake surgery in sitting position for chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common pathology in neurosurgery, especially in the elderly patients, and its incidence is likely to double in the next decade. Considering various features of CSDH and the procedure itself, a sitting position may retain the best characteristics of classic positioning, while offering additional comfort for both the patient and the surgeon. The aim of this study was to describe the technical aspects of this procedure in the sitting position, to evaluate safety and discuss the benefits and shortcomings of this modification.

METHOD

This study included a series of 55 patients surgically treated for CSDH in a sitting position at our department between December 2017 and September 2019, representing all the patients operated on during the study period by a single surgeon. Bilateral hematomas were present in 19 patients. Outcomes, during the 6-month follow-up period, were defined as good (CSDH and symptoms resolved) or poor (lethal outcome or reoccurrence). All complications were noted, with emphasis on pneumocephalus, and complications related to the sitting position: tension pneumocephalus, venous air embolism, and compression nerve injury.

RESULTS

Complications previously associated with the sitting position were not noted. The Glasgow Coma Scale and Markwalder Grading Scale scores improved significantly after the surgery (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018). Complications were noted in 17 patients (30.9%), and included 5 cerebrospinal fluid drainages, 3 hematoma reoccurrences, 2 wound infections, and 9 more single-occurring complications. The in-hospital mortality was 5.4% (3 out of 55 patients), while the overall mortality was 16.4% within the 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, even the severely ill patients tolerated the position well. No complications associated with the sitting position were noted. Future studies should confirm the safety of this position and evaluate the potential advantages for both the patient and the surgeon.