Outcomes and complications following minimally invasive excision of synovial cysts of the lumbar spine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes and adverse events for spinal synovial cysts surgical treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Spinal synovial cysts (SSCs) are a rare cause of nerve root and spinal cord compression. Surgical excision of SSCs remains the mainstay of treatment in the presence of unremitting symptoms or neurological deficits, but the choice of the surgical approach remains controversial. The goal of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with traditional approaches (interlaminar or laminectomy/hemilaminectomy) and minimally invasive approaches (microsurgical tubular approaches or endoscopic approaches) for SSCs.

METHODS

Studies reporting surgical management of SSCs were searched in three online databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement. It was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021288992). The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to evaluate bias. Extracted research data were statistically analyzed using Stata 16 and SPSS statistics 25.

RESULTS

A total of 22 related relevant studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence, reoperation, and operation time between minimally invasive approaches and traditional approaches (p > 0.05), but minimally invasive approaches had a good functional improvement (p = 0.004). Postoperative length of hospital stays and intraoperative bleeding in traditional approaches were also higher than in minimally invasive approaches (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, minimally invasive approaches may be better than traditional approaches in the treatment of SSCs. Minimally invasive approaches had the advantages of improving clinical satisfaction, with a similar complication rate to traditional approaches. Moreover, endoscopic and microsurgical tubular approaches had similar outcomes.

Percutaneous uniportal full-endoscopic surgery for treating symptomatic lumbar facet joint cysts under local anesthesia combined with monitored anesthesia care: a preliminary report of eight cases with at least 1 year follow-up

Background

Lumbar facet joint cysts (FJCs) are a relatively rare clinical pathology that can result in radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication. Various treatments such as percutaneous aspiration and surgery have been reported to have good clinical outcomes. However, few clinical studies have aimed to treat symptomatic lumbar FJCs by using uniportal full-endoscopic (UFE) surgery. This study aimed to investigate the preliminary clinical outcomes of UFE surgery for the treatment of lumbar FJCs under local anesthesia combined with monitored anesthesia care (MAC).

Methods

Eight patients (five males and three females) with symptomatic lumbar FJCs who underwent UFE surgery under local and MAC anesthesia were enrolled in this study between January 2018 and April 2022. The clinical characteristics, radiological features, operative information, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and overall outcome rating based on the modified MacNab criteria were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Of the eight patients, four underwent a transforaminal approach and four underwent an interlaminar approach. Postoperatively, the mean VAS score for leg pain decreased from 6.1 before surgery to 0.6 after surgery, and the ODI decreased from 74.5% to 14.7%. All patients were followed up for more than 1 year, and the good-to-excellent rate based on the modified MacNab criteria remained 100% at the last follow-up. No complications occurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Lumbar FJCs can cause severe radiating leg pain and/or neurogenic claudication due to the dural sac compression and nerve roots. As an alternative treatment, UFE decompression under local and MAC anesthesia may provide effective clinical outcomes for symptomatic lumbar FJCs.

Lumbar Synovial Cysts-Should You Fuse or Not?

BACKGROUND

Spinal synovial cysts are lesions that most commonly occur in the lumbar region. The need for an instrumented spinal fusion in addition to lumbar decompression with removal of the synovial cyst is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that select patients who underwent decompression with instrumented fusion for lumbar synovial cysts would be less likely to have subsequent surgery (SS) in a 2-year period than patients treated with laminectomy alone.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed using IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients who had a lumbar synovial cyst diagnosis and laminectomy surgery with or without fusion surgery were included in this study. Patients were tracked for SS 2 years after surgery. Laminectomy patients were propensity score-matched to laminectomy with fusion (LF) patients using a 2:1 ratio. The log-rank test and Cox regression were used to compare the cumulative incidence of SS between groups.

RESULTS

There were 7664 and 1631 patients treated with laminectomy and LF before matching. After matching, there were 2212 laminectomy and 1631 LF patients and patient characteristics were balanced. The 2-year incidence of recurrent SS was 3.1% ([CI]: 2.2%, 4.0%) and 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9%, 2.5%) laminectomy and LF, respectively. Compared with laminectomy, LF had a statistically significant lower risk of recurrent SS (hazard ratio: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.32-0.97]; P -value: .04).

CONCLUSION

All patients who had concomitant lumbar fusion showed decreased chance of having a cyst- or noncyst-related recurrence SS when compared with all patients undergoing laminectomy alone, regardless of diagnosis at the time of SS.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression without Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) can cause painful radiculopathy and sensory and/or motor deficits. Historically, first-line surgical treatment has been decompression with fusion. Recently, minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion has shown equal or superior results to traditional decompression and fusion methods.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion in the treatment of LSC as it relates to the rate of subsequent fusion surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed over a 10-year period of patients undergoing minimally invasive laminectomy for symptomatic LSCs. The primary end point was the rate of revision surgery requiring fusion.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with symptomatic LSCs underwent minimally invasive laminectomy alone January 2010-August 2020 at our institution. The most common location was L4-5 (72%). Preoperative imaging identified spondylolisthesis (grade 1) in 43 patients (57%), none of which was unstable on available dynamic radiographs. Average procedure duration was 93 minutes, with 78% of patients discharged home on the same day of surgery. Over 46 months of mean follow-up, 17 patients (20%) required 19 revision operations. Of those operations, 16 were spinal fusions (17.6%). Median time to fusion surgery was 36 months. There were no identifiable risk factors on multivariate regression analysis that predicted the need for fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive laminectomy is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic LSCs and avoids the need for fusion in most treated patients. Of our patients, 18% required a fusion over 46 months, suggesting that further studies are required to guide patient selection.