Acetabular labral tear description and measures of pincer and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and interobserver variability on 3 T MR arthrograms

The correlation between hip alpha angle and acetabular labral tear location and size: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Explore the correlation between hip morphology and labral tear location/size.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with hip pain who received magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography at our institution, between January 2017 and December 2020. Imaging analysis includes labral tear location and size, and hip morphology measurement with alpha angle, lateral center-edge (CE) angle, anterior CE angle, and femoral neck version. The correlation between hip morphology angles and labral tear location/size was evaluated using multiple regression, followed by stratification analysis with Chi-square test to investigate interactions between the variables.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (105 hips) with hip pain who received MR arthrography (mean age, 50 years ± 15 [SD]) were included, with mean alpha angle of 57.7° ± 9.9° [SD], mean lateral CE angle of 32.6° ± 6.8° [SD], mean anterior CE angle of 58.2° ± 8.1° [SD], mean femoral neck version of 17.1° ± 8.2° [SD]. Large alpha angle (>57°) and older age were both correlated with superior and posterosuperior labral tear incidence ( p < 0.05) and larger tear size ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, alpha angle is significantly correlated with superior labral tear incidence in young-age subgroup (age <45 years) ( p < 0.05), also significantly correlated with posterosuperior labral tear incidence and larger tear size in middle-age subgroup (45 ≤ age ≤ 60 years) ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A large alpha angle (>57°) is significantly correlated with increased incidence of superior and posterosuperior labral tear, and larger tear size in patients with hip pain, and the relationships depend on age.

Pre- and intraoperative decision-making challenges in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement

There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):532-540.

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement-Associated Labral Tears: Current Status and Future Prospects

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has emerged as a common cause of hip pain, especially in young patients. While the exact cause of FAI is unknown, it is thought to result from repetitive microtrauma to the proximal femoral epiphysis leading to abnormal biomechanics. Patients typically present with groin pain that is exacerbated by hip flexion and internal rotation. Diagnosis of FAI is made through careful consideration of patient presentation as well as physical exam and diagnostic imaging. Use of radiographs can help diagnose both cam and pincer lesions, while the use of MRI can diagnose labral tears and cartilage damage associated with FAI. Both non-operative and surgical options have their role in the treatment of FAI and its associated labral tears; however, hip arthroscopy has had successful outcomes when compared with physical therapy alone. Unfortunately, chondral lesions associated with FAI have had poorer outcomes with a higher conversion rate to arthroplasty. Capsular closure following hip arthroscopy has shown superior clinical outcomes and therefore should be performed if possible. More recently, primary labral reconstruction has emerged in the literature as a good option for irreparable labral tears. While non-operative management may have its role in treating patients with FAI, hip arthroscopy has developed a successful track record in being able to treat cam and pincer lesions, chondral damage, and labral injuries.

Hip and Groin Pain in Soccer Players

Purpose  The aim of this article is to illustrate the recent framework necessary to standardize studies on groin pain and review the existing literature on groin pain in football. Methods  The common pathological processes underlying groin pain such as muscle, tendon or ligament strain, bone injury or fracture, sport hernia, bursitis, osteitis pubis, and hip-related diseases have been reviewed and current management options have been considered. Results  Groin pain is considered a pain in pubic or lower abdominal or adductors region which can be monolateral or bilateral. It is common in high-intensity team sports and can negatively affect an athlete's professional carrier, causing serious disruption in the performance. Despite a high prevalence of groin pain in athletes, diagnosis and management of the underlying pathological processes remain a challenge for surgeons, radiologists, and physiotherapists alike. Conclusion  A multidisciplinary approach is essential for patients with groin pain allowing prompt diagnosis and initiation of treatment thus facilitating more rapid return to play and preventing potential long-term sequelae of chronic groin pathology.

Using a simplified version of a common surgical grading scale for acetabular labral tears improves the utility of preoperative hip MRI for femoroacetabular impingement

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a commonly used surgical grading scale, when applied to acetabular labral findings on MRI, could improve preoperative planning and counseling for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 76 clinical MRIs performed on patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Three musculoskeletal radiologists and one musculoskeletal fellow reviewed each scan in a blinded fashion, classifying the acetabular labrum from 12:00 to 4:00 using the Beck scale, a common surgical grading scale. Clinical correlation was provided via surgical examination and classification. Reliability was determined between readers and between reader and surgical data using Cohen's kappa and Krippendorff's alpha at each clock position and for the worst grading for each scan. In addition, a simplified version of the scale comprised of only two grades, potentially reparable and not potentially reparable, was evaluated.

RESULTS

When the scale was simplified into categories of potentially reparable and not potentially reparable, the sensitivity was excellent, ranging from 85.5 to 96%. Observer agreement when using individual Beck grades was found to range from poor to fair; Kappa ranged from 0.03 to 0.19, and Alpha ranged from - 0.27 to 0.22.

CONCLUSION

The simplified version of the Beck labral scale when applied to MRI is a highly sensitive predictor of potentially reparable labral pathology while excluding normal and grossly degenerative tissue. Use of this scale provides clinically relevant information that can drive preoperative planning and improve patient counseling. It does so in a standardized fashion that can be applied across practice sites and without additional cost.

[Labral pathologies of the hip joint]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip joint is performed for the diagnostics of many clinical pathologies. For clarification of pathologies of the hip joint conventional MRI and MR arthrography are used. The use of MRI either with or without the intravenous administration of contrast material is performed to diagnose bone marrow lesions, necrosis of the femoral head, inflammatory and tumorous lesions affecting the hip joint and its components. After the intra-articular administration of a diluted solution of contrast material, which results in distension of the joint, MR arthrography is performed for the diagnosis of intra-articular pathologies, such as lesions of the labrum acetabulare, chondral lesions and free intra-articular bodies. In recent times, MR arthrography is carried out with continuous traction of the limb to be examined because this leads to a distension of the joint and its components and in this way particularly lesions of the labrum with involvement of cartilage can be visualized even better. This article gives an overview of MRI and the accuracy of detecting lesions of the labrum acetabulare and the influence on the therapeutic approach.