Electrophysiological and phenotypic profiles of taxane-induced neuropathy

Comparison of nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuro-pathy: a cross-sectional cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There remains limited evidence regarding the relative neurotoxic potential of nab-paclitaxel long-term. This cross-sectional matched cohort study aimed to compare the severity and natural history of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) between patients treated with nab-paclitaxel and patients treated with oxaliplatin or paclitaxel using a suite of clinical, patient reported, and neurophysiological assessments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CIPN assessments included the total neuropathy score (TNSc), grooved pegboard assessment, sensory assessments (grating orientation task and Von-Frey assessment), patient-reported outcome measures, and neurophysiological studies. The matched cohort included 72 patients (24 nab-paclitaxel, 24 paclitaxel, and 24 oxaliplatin); each stratified into two groups by time post-treatment, 0-4 months, and > 6 months.

RESULTS

Chronic neuropathy was reported by 71% of nab-paclitaxel-treated patients, most prominently numbness in the lower limbs. Longer time post-treatment was associated with significantly better TNSc scores (p = 0.044). Neuropathy severity was similar for nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel. Neuropathy severity was worse for oxaliplatin compared to nab-paclitaxel, as measured by sensory function (p < 0.05) and sural amplitude (p = 0.003), but similar for patient-reported and neurological-graded assessments.

INTERPRETATION

These findings underscore the importance of inclusion of a range of multimodal CIPN assessments to characterize relative burden of toxicity between chemotherapy agents. CIPN severity was similar between nab-paclitaxel and paclitaxel cohorts, but more severe in oxaliplatin-treated patients.

Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Evaluating Nerve Damage Following Chemotherapy

Importance

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a substantial adverse effect of anticancer treatments. As such, the assessment of CIPN remains critically important in both research and clinic settings.

Objective

To compare the validity of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with neurophysiological and sensory functional measures as the optimal method of CIPN assessment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study evaluated participants treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy across 2 cohorts using a dual-study design. Participants commencing treatment were assessed prospectively at beginning of neurotoxic treatment, midtreatment, and at the end of treatment. Participants who completed treatment up to 5 years prior were assessed cross-sectionally and completed a single assessment time point. Participants were recruited from oncology centers in Australia from August 2015 to November 2022. Data analysis occurred from February to November 2023.

Exposures

Neurotoxic cancer treatment including taxanes, platinums, vinca-alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide.

Main Outcomes and Measures

CIPN was assessed via PROMs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC-CIPN20], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Cancer Group Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]), neurological and neurophysiological assessment (Total Neuropathy Score and sural and tibial compound nerve amplitudes), and sensory measures (Grating orientation, Von Frey monofilament, and 2-point discrimination tasks). Core measurement properties of CIPN outcome measures were evaluated. Convergent and known-groups validity was assessed cross-sectionally following treatment completion, and responsiveness was evaluated prospectively during treatment. Neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measure scores were compared between those who reported high and low levels of CIPN symptoms using linear regressions.

Results

A total of 1033 participants (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-59] years; 676 female [65.4%]) were recruited to this study, incorporating 1623 assessments. PROMs demonstrated best ability to accurately assess CIPN (convergent validity), especially the PRO-CTCAE composite score (r = 0.85; P < .001) and EORTC-CIPN20 (r = 0.79; P < .001). PROMS also demonstrated the best ability to discriminate between CIPN severity (known-groups validity) and to detect changes at onset of CIPN development (responsiveness), especially for EORTC-CIPN20 (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83), FACT/GOG-Ntx (d = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and the PRO-CTCAE (d = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02). Other measures did not achieve threshold for convergent validity (α < 0.7). Neurophysiological and sensory measures did not demonstrate acceptable responsiveness. In regression models, neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measures were significantly impaired in participants who reported high levels of CIPN symptoms compared with those who reported low levels of CIPN symptoms.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 1033 cancer patients, PROMs were the only measures to satisfy all 3 core measurement property criteria (convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness). These findings suggest that adoption of PROMs in clinical practice can equip clinicians with valuable information in assessing CIPN morbidity.

Conservative non-pharmacological treatments for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies in women treated for breast cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Over the last few decades, the use of neo/adjuvant therapies has significantly increased the number of breast cancer survivors who experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). To date, few, low-efficacy, pharmacological remedies exist to manage this side effect. For this reason, alternative treatments are increasingly being investigated as possible strategies to prevent or promote faster recovery from CIPN. In this review we aimed to provide an overview of the literature evidence regarding all the non-pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions for patients affected by CIPN secondary to breast cancer care.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science and included a total of 1895 patients (1528 with breast cancer) with a wide range of CIPN (motor, sensory and autonomic neuropathies) and chemotherapy treatments (e.g., Taxanes, Platins, Vinca alkaloids or monoclonal antibody drugs).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of the initial 1108 hits, only 25 studies - describing different treatment modalities for peripheral neuropathies - were finally included in the qualitative synthesis. Most studies focused on acupuncture, physiotherapy, cryotherapy, and yoga.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still controversial evidence on conservative non-pharmacological interventions for the management of CIPN symptoms. We believe however that moderate exercise, as well as all types of stress reducing activities like sport, yoga and mindfulness, should be encouraged in cancer patients for their positive effect on global physical and psychological health. Further studies of higher methodological quality are needed to determine the best conservative approach to CIPN.

Characterising vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in adults: symptom development and long-term persistent outcomes

BACKGROUND

Decades following the introduction of vincristine as treatment for haematological malignancies, vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) remains a pervasive, untreatable side-effect. However there remains a gap in understanding the characteristics of VIPN in adults. This study presents a comprehensive phenotyping of VIPN.

METHODS

Adult patients (n = 57; age = 59.8 ± 14.6) were assessed cross-sectionally following completion of vincristine (months post treatment = 16.3 ± 15.6, cumulative dose = 7.6 ± 4.4), with a subset of 20 patients assessed prospectively during treatment. Patient reported measures (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20, R-ODS) were used to profile symptoms and disability. Neurological assessment was undertaken using the Total Neuropathy Score and nerve conduction studies. Sensory threshold and fine motor tasks were also undertaken. Comparisons of data between timepoints were calculated using paired-sample t tests or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Comparisons between outcome measures were calculated with independent sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric data.

RESULTS

The majority of patients developed VIPN by mid-treatment (77.8%, 7.0 ± 3.3 weeks post baseline) with the prevalence remaining stable by end-of-treatment (75%, 8.1 ± 1.7 weeks post mid-treatment). By 3 months post-completion, 50% of patients still reported VIPN although there were significant improvements on neurological grading and functional assessment (P < 0.05). VIPN presented with sensorimotor involvement in upper and lower limbs and was associated with decreased sensory and motor nerve amplitudes, reduced fine-motor function and increased disability.

CONCLUSION

VIPN in adults presents as a sensorimotor, upper- and lower-limb neuropathy that significantly impacts disability and function. Neuropathy recovery occurs in a proportion of patients; however, VIPN symptoms may persist and continue to affect long-term quality of life.

Upper-limb dysfunction in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Upper-limb symptoms are often reported in the context of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN), but objective quantification of functional deficits is often lacking. We examined and compared a range of neurophysiological and functional assessments of the upper-limb in the assessment of CIPN severity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional assessment of neurotoxic chemotherapy-treated patients was undertaken using patient-reported and clinically-graded CIPN measures. Upper-limb functional assessments comprised of assessing fine motor skills, sensory perception, and neurophysiological measures of the median nerve. Group comparisons between participants who reported absence or presence of upper-limb functional deficits were investigated.

RESULTS

60 participants who were 11.5 (IQR = 4.0-26.0) months post-neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment reported CIPN. 65% (n = 39) reported upper-limb CIPN symptoms. Reduction in fine motor skills, sensory perception and median nerve SNAP amplitudes were associated with higher CIPN severity. Participants who self-reported presence of upper-limb functional deficits had worse CIPN severity across all measures, compared to participants who reported no upper-limb functional deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants who reported upper-limb symptoms and functional deficits had worse CIPN severity and quality-of-life. There is a high burden of upper-limb dysfunction long after neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment cessation. Focus on research into supportive care and rehabilitation options to improve upper-limb function is warranted to improve patient quality-of-life.

Sleep dysfunction associated with worse chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Sleep problems are commonly reported by cancer survivors; however, knowledge of the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) on sleep quality remains limited. In this study, we explored the impact of CIPN on sleep quality, as well as identified clinical characteristics associated with poor sleep quality.

METHODS

Participants were assessed cross-sectionally post-neurotoxic chemotherapy. CIPN severity was graded using a range of questionnaires that assessed CIPN severity and quality of life, as well as neurological grading scales. Sleep quality was assessed using a self-rated questionnaire (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI). Participants with poor sleep quality were further grouped according to whether sleep impairment was due to CIPN or other factors.

RESULTS

Among 77 participants who reported CIPN, 75% (n = 58) reported poor sleep quality. Of those, 41% (n = 24) reported CIPN as contributing to sleep impairment, while 59% (n = 34) reported other causes. Participants with CIPN-induced sleep impairments had higher CIPN severity across all outcome measures, as well as greater neuropathic pain (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, participants with CIPN-induced sleep impairments reported worse impact of neuropathy on physical and social functioning, as well as emotional well-being (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with CIPN-induced poor sleep quality reported worse scores across all CIPN severity measures. This emphasises the negative impacts of CIPN symptoms on quality of life of chemotherapy-treated patients and highlights the importance of sleep quality assessment in cancer survivors.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis, Agents, General Clinical Presentation, and Treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Agent-specific presentation and pathophysiology is also being discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

As new systemic oncological treatments continue to be developed, the number of cancer survivors continues to grow. Survivors are living longer with the long-term side effects of oncological treatments. We reviewed the pathophysiology of agent-specific chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and the updates in its treatment and preventative tools. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a debilitating long-term side effect that often impairs cancer survivors' function and quality of life. The increasing life expectancy of cancer survivors has resulted in increased prevalence of this condition. Understanding its intricacies can provide physicians with better treatment tools and research opportunities to develop or identify new therapeutic agents.

Serum neurofilament levels correlate with electrodiagnostic evidence of axonal loss in paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

INTRODUCTION

Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN) typically manifests as a predominantly sensory axonopathy. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) represent the gold standard method to quantify axonal impairment in PIPN. Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are emerging biomarkers for quantifying axonal damage in peripheral neuropathies. To date, the association between NCS abnormalities and sNfL levels during paclitaxel-based chemotherapy has not been specifically addressed.

METHODS

We prospectively conducted longitudinal measurement of sNfL levels in 27 chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients and correlated conventional NCS recordings with sNfL in 22 of them, before (T0) and after (T1) 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel-based therapy.

RESULTS

PIPN was diagnosed in 24/27 patients (88%) after completion of the 12-week paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen. Serum NfL levels (pg/mL) were significantly higher at T1 compared to T0 (T0: 18.50 ± 12.88 vs T1: 255.80 ± 194.16; p < 0.001). The increase of sNfL levels at T1 significantly correlated with the decrease or abolishment of amplitudes recorded from the sural nerve (r = 0.620; p = 0.0035), sensory radial (r = 0.613; p = 0.005), sensory ulnar (r = 0.630; p = 0.005), and peroneal motor (r = 0.568; p = 0.024) nerves.

CONCLUSION

sNfL levels proportionally increase during chemotherapy administration and significantly correlate with NCS axonal abnormalities in patients with PIPN. A multimodal testing approach employing both sNfL and NCS might improve the PIPN diagnostic accuracy.

Risk Factors for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Advanced Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies affecting women and the leading cause of related mortality worldwide. An estimated 2260000 new cases of BC were diagnosed in 2020, which have seriously threatened the health. Paclitaxel (PTX), a natural product isolated from the bark of the pacific yew, has been found to be effective in treating advanced BC. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which refers to the damage to the peripheral nerves caused by exposure to a neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agent, is a common side effect affecting the patients undergoing PTX chemotherapy. Significant research efforts are needed to identify the various risk factors associated with CIPN. Here, a univariate analysis in BC patients with nanonab-PTX treatment was performed. The rate of CIPN in BC patients with albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) for more than four weeks was significantly higher than that of patients with chemotherapy for less than four weeks. Moreover, the rate of CIPN in BC patients receiving nab-PTX first-line chemotherapy was remarkably higher than that in BC patients receiving paclitaxel as a sequence scheme. Taken together, chemotherapy cycles and the priority of nab-PTX-based chemotherapy can be considered the potential risk factors for CIPN induced by nab-PTX.

Effects of combined chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 treatment on peripheral neuropathy and neuroinflammation in mice

ABSTRACT

A modern approach for cancer treatment is the use of immunotherapy, and particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), alone and in combination with chemotherapy. The PD-1 pathway plays a crucial role in inhibiting immune responses and recently has been shown to modulate neuronal activity. However, the impact of PD-1 blockade on the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is currently unknown. In this study, we show that C57BL/6 mice treated with the chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel or cotherapy (paclitaxel and anti-PD-1), but not with anti-PD-1 alone, exhibited increased mechanical sensitivity of the hind paw. Both chemotherapy and immunotherapy caused a reduction in neurite outgrowth of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) explants derived from treated mice, whereas only paclitaxel reduced the neurite outgrowth after direct in vitro treatment. Mice treated with anti-PD-1 or cotherapy exhibited distinct T-cell changes in the lymph nodes and increased T-cell infiltration into the DRG. Mice treated with paclitaxel or cotherapy had increased macrophage presence in the DRG, and all treated groups presented an altered expression of microglia markers in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. We conclude that combining anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with paclitaxel does not increase the severity of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. However, because anti-PD-1 treatment caused significant changes in DRG and spinal cord immunity, caution is warranted when considering immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in patients with a high risk of developing neuropathy.

Association of electrochemical skin conductance with neuropathy in chemotherapy-treated patients

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an adverse event of cancer treatment that can affect sensory, motor, or autonomic nerves. Assessment of autonomic neuropathy is challenging, with limited available tools. Accordingly, it is not routinely assessed in chemotherapy-treated patients. In this study, we aimed to examine whether electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) via Sudoscan, a potential measure of autonomic function, associates with subjective and objective measures of CIPN severity and autonomic neuropathy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional assessment of patients who completed neurotoxic chemotherapy 3-24 months prior was undertaken using CIPN patient-reported outcomes (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20), clinically graded scale (NCI-CTCAE), neurological examination score (TNSc), autonomic outcome measure (SAS), and Sudoscan. Differences in CIPN severity between participants with or without ESC dysfunction were investigated. Linear regression analyses were used to identify whether ESC values could predict CIPN severity.

RESULTS

A total of 130 participants were assessed, with 93 participants classified with CIPN according to the clinically graded scale (NCI-CTCAE/grade ≥ 1), while 49% demonstrated hands or feet ESC dysfunction (n = 46). Participants with ESC dysfunction did not significantly differ from those with no dysfunction on multiple CIPN severity measures (clinical-grade, patient-report, neurological examination), and no differences on the autonomic outcome measure (SAS) (all p > 0.0063). Linear regression analyses showed that CIPN could not be predicted by ESC values.

CONCLUSIONS

The inability of ESC values via Sudoscan to predict clinically-graded and patient-reported CIPN or autonomic dysfunction questions its clinical utility for chemotherapy-treated patients. The understanding of autonomic neuropathy with chemotherapy treatment remains limited and must be addressed to improve quality of life in cancer survivors.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanisms and Treatment

PURPOSE

This review provides an update on the current clinical, epidemiological and pathophysiological evidence alongside the diagnostic, prevention and treatment approach to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

FINDINGS

The incidence of cancer and long-term survival after treatment is increasing. CIPN affects sensory, motor and autonomic nerves and is one of the most common adverse events caused by chemotherapeutic agents, which in severe cases leads to dose reduction or treatment cessation, with increased mortality. The primary classes of chemotherapeutic agents associated with CIPN are platinum-based drugs, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, bortezomib and thalidomide. Platinum agents are the most neurotoxic, with oxaliplatin causing the highest prevalence of CIPN. CIPN can progress from acute to chronic, may deteriorate even after treatment cessation (a phenomenon known as coasting) or only partially attenuate. Different chemotherapeutic agents share both similarities and key differences in pathophysiology and clinical presentation. The diagnosis of CIPN relies heavily on identifying symptoms, with limited objective diagnostic approaches targeting the class of affected nerve fibres. Studies have consistently failed to identify at-risk cohorts, and there are no proven strategies or interventions to prevent or limit the development of CIPN. Furthermore, multiple treatments developed to relieve symptoms and to modify the underlying disease in CIPN have failed.

IMPLICATIONS

The increasing prevalence of CIPN demands an objective approach to identify at-risk patients in order to prevent or limit progression and effectively alleviate the symptoms associated with CIPN. An evidence base for novel targets and both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments is beginning to emerge and has been recognised recently in publications by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and analgesic trial design expert groups such as ACTTION.

Review Article "Spotlight on Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Disease: The Evidence to Date"

Neuromuscular ultrasound is rapidly becoming incorporated into clinical practice as a standard tool in the assessment of peripheral nerve diseases. Ultrasound complements clinical phenotyping and electrodiagnostic evaluation, providing critical structural anatomical information to enhance diagnosis and identify structural pathology. This review article examines the evidence supporting neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of compressive mononeuropathies, traumatic nerve injury, generalised peripheral neuropathy and motor neuron disease. Extending the sonographic evaluation of nerves beyond simple morphological measurements has the potential to improve diagnostics in peripheral neuropathy, as well as advancing the understanding of pathological mechanisms, which in turn will promote precise therapies and improve therapeutic outcomes.

Neurophysiologic assessment of small fibre damage in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

In patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), demonstration of small fibre (SF) damage is important to understand chronic late effects.

METHODS

Thirty patients having complaints compatible with possible CIPN following treatment with oxaliplatin or docetaxel were compared with 27 healthy subjects. All subjects were evaluated with quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessing SF function and laser evoked potentials (LEP). In addition, SF-damage was assessed using cutaneous silent periods evoked with electrical (El-CSP) and laser (Ls-CSP) stimuli.

RESULTS

For LEP, N2P2 amplitudes were significantly smaller in patients than controls in both upper (P = 0.007) and lower extremities (P = 0.002), and the N1 amplitude in upper extremities of patients were significantly smaller than in controls (P = 0.001). SF-QST, LEP, Ls-CSP, and El-CSP were abnormal in 10 (33.3%), 16 (53.3%), 19 (63.3%), and 24 (80%) of CIPN patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with possible CIPN, El-CSP and Ls-CSP were more often abnormal than LEP and QST. This is probably because El-CSP and Ls-CSP inform mainly about peripheral nociceptive fibres, while LEP and QST inform about peripheral and central nociceptive pathways together.

SIGNIFICANCE

LEP and QST are established methods to detect SF-damage. El- and Ls-CSP might help clinicians in diagnosing SF-damage.

Weekly Paclitaxel-Induced Neurotoxicity in Breast Cancer: Outcomes and Dose Response

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel treatment produces significant peripheral neuropathy, but the time course of neuropathy development and outcomes are unclear. Dose reduction is the only strategy to prevent neurotoxicity, however, the impact of dose-reduction on neuropathy outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to prospectively evaluated neuropathy development from weekly paclitaxel treatment and evaluate the impact of dose-reduction on post-treatment neuropathy outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel (80mg/m² ) weekly for 12-weeks were prospectively assessed using patient reported (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity; FACTGOG-Ntx), clinical (Total Neuropathy Score clinical version; TNSc) and neurophysiological measures up to 12-months post completion. The impact of dose-reduction on post-treatment (3.6 ± 0.1 months) clinical and patient reported outcomes was evaluated in 105 weekly paclitaxel-treated patients.

RESULTS

Significant neuropathy was present by 6-weeks across patient-reported, clinical, and objective neurophysiological assessments, increasing in prevalence and severity over the treatment course. Limited recovery occurred, with significant neuropathy being maintained up to 12 months (p < .05). Patients who received dose reduction had worse patient reported (FACT-GOG-Ntx: 40.2 ± .1.4) and clinical neuropathy outcomes (TNSc: 4.3 ± 0.4) compared to those who received the full dose (FACT-GOG-Ntx: 45.9 ± 0.9; TNSc: 3.3 ± 0.3, p < .05). Patients who ceased treatment early demonstrated the worse deficits (TNSc: 5.0 ± 0.6; FACT-GOG-Ntx: 37.3 ± 2.7) compared to those who received the complete dose (TNSc: 3.5 ± 0.3; FACT-GOG-Ntx: 45.3 ± 0.9, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Weekly paclitaxel produces symptomatic and objective neuropathy early in the treatment course which can persist. Dose reduction does not necessarily lead to more favorable neuropathy outcomes, with individual risk factors likely important in addition to cumulative dose.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Weekly paclitaxel schedules are extensively used in breast cancer. Patients may develop symptomatic and objective neuropathy early in the treatment course, with these individuals requiring closer monitoring. Furthermore, neuropathy is a long-term sequela that may impact quality of life and require appropriate supportive services. Results suggest that dose reduction does not necessarily lead to better neuropathy outcomes. Understanding schedule-specific toxicity and risk factors for neuropathy will be critical to determining individualized treatment strategies and improving quality of life in breast cancer survivors.