Efficacy and safety profile of fenofibrate-coated microgranules 130 mg, with and without food, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome: An 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

New Photosafety Assessment Strategy Based on the Photochemical and Pharmacokinetic Properties of Both Parent Chemicals and Metabolites

Photoreactivity and dermal/ocular deposition of compounds have been recognized as key considerations for evaluating the phototoxic risk of compounds. Because some drugs are known to cause phototoxic reactions via generation of potent phototoxic metabolites, photosafety assessments on parent drugs alone may lead to false predictions about their photosafety. This study aimed to establish a new photosafety assessment strategy for evaluating the in vivo phototoxic potential of both a parent substance and its metabolites. The in vivo phototoxic risk of fenofibrate (FF) and its metabolites, fenofibric acid (FA) and reduced fenofibric acid, were evaluated based on photochemical and pharmacokinetic analyses. FF and FA exhibited intensive UV absorption, with molar extinction coefficient values of 17,000 (290 nm) and 14,000 M(-1)cm(-1) (295 nm), respectively. Superoxide generation from FA was significantly higher than from FF, and a marked increase in superoxide generation from FF was observed after incubation with rat hepatic S9 fractions, suggesting enhanced photoreactivity of FF after metabolism. FA showed high dermal/ocular deposition after oral administration (5 mg/kg, p.o.) although the concentration of FF was negligible, suggesting high exposure risk from FA. On the basis of these findings, FA was deduced to be a major contributor to phototoxicity induced by FF taken orally, and this prediction was in accordance with the results from in vitro/in vivo phototoxicity tests. Results from this study suggest that this new screening strategy for parent substances and their metabolites provides reliable photosafety information on drug candidates and would be useful for drug development with wide safety margins.

A Review of Currently Available Fenofibrate and Fenofibric Acid Formulations

Fenofibrate is a third-generation fibric acid derivative indicated as a monotherapy to reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B; to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia; and to reduce triglycerides in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. In this review, the key characteristics of available fenofibrate formulations are examined. A literature search was conducted, focusing on comparative studies examining bioavailability, food effects, absorption, and lipid efficacy. Fenofibrate is highly lipophilic, virtually insoluble in water, and poorly absorbed. Coadministration with meals was necessary to maximize bioavailability of early formulations. Micronized and nanoparticle formulations of fenofibrate with reduced particle sizes were developed, resulting in greater solubility, improved bioavailability, and in some cases, the ability to be given irrespective of food. A recently introduced hydrophilic choline salt of fenofibric acid also can be taken without regard to meals, is absorbed throughout the gastrointestinal tract, has the highest bioavailability among marketed formulations, and is approved for coadministration with a statin. Differences in bioavailability of fenofibrate formulations have resulted in low-dose (40 - 67) mg and standard-dose (120 - 200 mg) formulations. Different formulations are not equivalent on a milligram-to-milligram basis. In order to prevent medication errors, resulting in underdosing or overdosing with attendant consequences, it is important for healthcare providers to recognize that the formulations of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid that are currently available vary substantially in relation to food effect, equivalency on a milligram-to-milligram basis, and indication to be coadministered with a statin.

Therapeutic effects of fibrates in postprandial lipemia

Hypertriglyceridemia is observed in many metabolic diseases such as the metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, or mixed dyslipidemia frequently leading to premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Additionally, several studies have shown that postprandial hypertriglyceridemia is pronounced in patients with CHD, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and other pathologic conditions. The triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants accumulating in the postprandial state seem to be involved in atherogenesis and in events leading to thrombosis. Since abnormal postprandial lipemia is associated with pathologic conditions, its treatment is of clinical importance.Fibrates are of significant help in managing hypertriglyceridemia. This review summarizes the effect of fibric acid derivatives on postprandial lipemia. Fibrates decrease the production of and enhance the catabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. Results of clinical studies with fibrates have confirmed their action in decreasing postprandial triglyceride levels by increasing lipoprotein lipase activity, decreasing apolipoprotein CIII production, and by increasing fatty acid oxidation in the liver.It is concluded that fibrates are effective agents in lowering the postprandial increase in remnant lipoprotein particles and retinyl palmitate. Furthermore, fibrates can also affect the postprandial lipid profile by increasing hepatic lipase levels and in some cases, by reducing cholesterol ester transfer protein activity. The main target of fibrate therapy is to improve fasting hypertriglyceridemia, which is an essential component associated with improving postprandial lipemia. Fibrates are well tolerated by patients and adverse effects have been reported rarely after their administration.

Fenofibrate for cardiovascular disease prevention in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Clinical guidelines highlight the importance of managing atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia to reduce the risk of premature cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. The lipid-modifying activity of fenofibrate, as demonstrated in clinical studies, indicates its effectiveness in treating dyslipidemia characteristic of these conditions. Fenofibrate also has a favorable impact on a number of nonlipid residual risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome, mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. In patients with type 2 diabetes, fenofibrate is effective in reducing the progression of coronary artery disease, as demonstrated by the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS). In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, the primary end point (major coronary events) was not significantly reduced by fenofibrate treatment. However, other findings from this study suggest that fenofibrate reduces cardiovascular risk. Both DAIS and the FIELD study also indicate that fenofibrate may offer additional vascular benefits, specifically affecting the progression of diabetes-related microvascular disease.

Hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk reduction

BACKGROUND

Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels are prevalent among the US population, often occurring in persons who are overweight or obese, or who have type 2 diabetes or the metabolic syndrome. There is evidence that elevated TG levels may be a significant independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD), particularly in women.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews data on the epidemiology, associated risks, treatment, and prevention of hypertriglyceridemia, including recommended TG goals and available TG-lowering agents.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for articles published from 1990 through 2006 using the terms hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidemia, and coronary heart disease, with subheadings for risk, statins, niacin, fibrates, thiazolidinediones, and omega-3 fatty acids. The reference lists of relevant articles were examined for additional citations. Publications discussing the epidemiology of hypertriglyceridemia, CHD risk, treatment guidelines for lipid management, clinical trials involving TG-lowering drugs, and outcomes for lipid-modifying therapies were selected for review.

RESULTS

Concern over the increasing rate of hypertriglyceridemia and its deleterious health consequences is reflected in the most recent National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Several lipid-lowering agents are available, including statins, fibrates, niacin, thiazolidinediones, and prescription omega-3 fatty acids. Clinical trials of these drugs have reported lowering of TG by 7% to 50%. Along with lifestyle changes, the use of combination pharmacotherapy to reduce lipid levels (including TG) may be an effective strategy in patients with dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

Use of strategies to manage TG levels, along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is warranted to help reduce the risk of CHD.

Effects of fenofibrate on atherogenic dyslipidemia in hypertriglyceridemic subjects

BACKGROUND

The metabolic syndrome (MS) is often accompanied by atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is characterized by elevated triglycerides (TG), reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and elevated numbers of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles.

HYPOTHESIS

It was hypothesized that a threshold exists for the circulating TG level needed to produce changes in LDL subclass distribution.

METHODS

Hypertriglyceridemic (TG > or =300 and <1000 mg/dl) subjects with the MS were randomly assigned to placebo (n=50) or 130 mg/day of micronized fenofibrate-coated microgranules (n=96) for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

In the overall analysis, fenofibrate treatment resulted in significant (p < 0.05) changes versus placebo in TG (-36.6%), non-HDL-C (-7.5%), very low-density lipoprotein-C (-32.7%), LDL-C (15.0%), HDL-C (14.0%), remnant lipoprotein-C (-35.1%), apolipoprotein B (-6.0%), apolipoprotein A-I (5.3%), and apolipoprotein C-III--29.7%). Changes in LDL particle diameter in the fenofibrate group were significantly inversely associated with the TG level achieved on treatment (p = 0.019). When individually matched for percent change in TG, subjects with on-treatment TG < 200 mg/dl, in contrast to those with on-treatment values > or =200 mg/dl, had significantly different median responses (p < 0.05) in LDL size (0.79 vs. -0.06 nm) and cholesterol carried by small (-35 vs. 21 mg/dl) and large (31 vs. 11 mg/dl) particles.

CONCLUSION

These data support the view that a threshold exists below which the TG level must be lowered to produce shifts in LDL particle size.

Statin safety: an overview and assessment of the data--2005

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statin drugs, have been studied in numerous controlled human research trials involving hundreds of thousands of study participants. Statins have been prescribed for millions of patients. Based on this vast research and clinical experience, statins have been shown to improve lipid blood levels and reduce atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, resulting in reduced CAD morbidity and mortality, and in several studies, reduced overall ("all-cause") mortality. From a safety perspective, both research trial evidence and clinical practice experience have demonstrated that statins are generally well tolerated. However, as with all pharmaceuticals, safety considerations exist with both monotherapy and combination statin therapy, mainly involving potential adverse effects on muscle, liver, kidney, and the nervous system. The evidence supporting statin-related potential adverse experiences on these organ systems is sometimes strong and based on clear clinical trial evidence (such as the increased risk of muscle enzyme elevation with higher statin doses). The evidence is at other times more speculative, being based on case reports and inconclusive clinical trial data (such as possible favorable or unfavorable effects of statins on cognition). Because the use of statins is so widespread, it is useful for the clinician to understand statin safety issues and the level of available evidence supporting the contention that various adverse effects are caused by statins. This review presents an assessment of statin safety based on an overview of the current statin safety data and their clinical implications.