Incidence of infection during efalizumab therapy for psoriasis: analysis of the clinical trial experience

Skin and soft tissue infections in biological therapy for psoriasis-A case report and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Biological therapies are widely used for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis owing to their high efficacy and safety profile. However, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) have been reported in association with biological treatment in psoriasis.

METHODS

We report a case of necrotizing fasciitis in an 18-year-old psoriasis patient with a history of severe combined immunodeficiency treated with secukinumab and conducted a systematic literature review of SSTIs associated with biological therapy for psoriasis. The literature review related to biological therapies for psoriasis between the years 1990 and 2020: Medline (PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for psoriasis, biological treatment, and skin and soft tissue infections.

RESULTS

Over 1,300 titles were found, 24 of which met the inclusion criteria for our study: nine retrospective studies, nine randomized controlled trials, and six prospective studies. The data covered 10 biological treatments. More than 40,000 patients receiving biological treatment were included, and nearly 1,000 cases of SSTIs were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the available records regarding SSTIs among chronic plaque psoriasis patients given biological treatment. Most reported SSTIs were related to psoriasis patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors. In view of the presented data, biological treatment appears to be a safe mode of therapy for this aspect of psoriasis.

Increased risk of herpes zoster in patients with psoriasis: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Objectives

The risk of herpes zoster (HZ) between patients with psoriasis receiving and not receiving systemic therapy has received increasing attention. This study investigated the association of psoriasis with the risk of HZ.

Methods

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The psoriasis cohort consisted of 4077 patients with newly diagnosed psoriasis between 2000 and 2006. Each patient with psoriasis was frequency-matched with four people without psoriasis, by sex, age and index year. (nonpsoriasis cohort; 16308 subjects). Patients who received systemic therapy were classified as having severe psoriasis, whereas those who did not receive systemic therapy were classified as having mild psoriasis. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between psoriasis and HZ risk.

Results

The overall incidence density rate of HZ in the psoriasis cohort than in the nonpsoriasis cohort (4.50 vs. 3.44 per 1,000 person-years), with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model measured adjusted HR of 1.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07–1.56]. In additional, compared with the nonpsoriasis cohort, the risk of HZ was higher in the severe psoriasis cohort than in the nonpsoriasis cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–2.27). The comparison between psoriasis and nonpsoriasis cohorts revealed a greatest magnitude risk of HZ in women (adjusted HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04–1.79), study participants in the age group of 20–39 years (adjusted HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.17–2.66), and study participants without any comorbidities (adjusted HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02–1.84).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that psoriasis is associated with an increased risk of HZ, which involves differences in sex and age. Although systemic therapy may have a major role in the risk of HZ, the intrinsic factors of psoriasis cannot be excluded.

Biologic Therapeutics in the Treatment of Psoriasis. Part 1: Review

Background:

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease principally mediated by activated T cells, which release proinflammatory cytokines with reactive epidermal changes in the skin, producing the characteristic lesions of psoriasis. New research into possible treatment options has been inspired by increased understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis and advances in immunology and molecular biology permitting the development of targeted, highly active biologic agents.

Objective:

The aim of this article is to review the efficacy and safety of five biologic therapeutics in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and to provide practical guidelines for integration of these agents in the management of psoriasis.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE (1966–2005) for articles containing the key words: alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab and searched recent conference abstracts.

Results:

Emerging immunotherapeutic agents (fusion proteins, recombinant cytokines, fusion toxins, or antibodies) target T cells or cytokines responsible for plaque formation that is characteristic of psoriasis. Alefacept is the first biologic to be approved in both the United States and Canada. More recently, efalizumab and etanercept and infliximab have been approved in the United States and Canada for plaque-type psoriasis. Adalimumab is currently in phase III clinical trials.

Conclusion:

These novel biologics offer an intriguing and effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Treatment-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: current understanding and future steps

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disorder of the brain caused by a ubiquitous polyomavirus, JC virus. PML is almost always associated with some underlying immunosuppression and acquired immune deficiency syndrome has been the most common predisposing disorder. Recently, different pharmacological agents have been demonstrated to increase the risk of PML. Therapies that predispose people to PML can be classified into three categories: therapies that uniquely increase the risk for the disorder, such as the monoclonal antibodies natalizumab and efalizumab; therapies that appear to increase the risk in individuals already at risk of PML due to pre-existing conditions, such as rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil; and therapies with a mechanism of action that might suggest a potential for increased PML risk and/or with which rare cases of PML have been observed. Unlike the latter two classes, therapeutic agents uniquely increasing the risk of PML are associated with a much greater prevalence of the disorder and a latent interval from the time of drug initiation to the development of PML. PML development with pharmacological agents has provided new insight into the pathogenesis of this devastating disorder. This review focuses on the risks of PML with multiple pharmacological agents, the proposed pathogenesis with these agents, and potential risk mitigation strategies.

Risk of tuberculosis infection in anti-TNF-α biological therapy: from bench to bedside

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) biological agents, including soluble TNF-α receptors and anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies, bring new hope for treating rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, but also increase the risk of infection, especially tuberculosis (TB) infection. Recent findings have shown that the physiological TNF-mediated signaling was somehow impaired by TNF antagonists, leading to the exacerbation of chronic infection associated with aberrant granuloma formation and maintenance. Although both receptor and antibody agents appear to pose an equally high risk in causing development of new TB infections, monoclonal anti-TNF-α antibody seems more inclined to reactivate latent TB infection. This review is focused on the underlying mechanisms that cause the TB risk in the anti-TNF-α therapy and also the strategies to deal with it, with the aim of reducing the TB incidence during anti-TNF-α biological therapies.

Risk of Herpes zoster in patients with psoriasis treated with biologic drugs

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the risk of herpes zoster (HZ), among patients with psoriasis treated with biologic drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of HZ in patients with psoriasis and the association between HZ and use of biologic drugs in these patients.

METHODS

The study was performed utilizing the medical database of Clalit Health Services in Israel. The incidence of HZ events was calculated among patients with psoriasis treated with phototherapy, traditional systemic medications and biologic drugs. Incidence rates of HZ events were calculated for each medication, as well as hazard ratios adjusted for age, sex and healthcare utilization burden.

RESULTS

Among 22,330 psoriasis patients (215,656 person-years), 1321 HZ cases were diagnosed. The crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 6.0 for UVB phototherapy (95% confidence interval (CI), 0-12.8), 10.1 for PUVΑ (1.3-19.0), 5.4 for acitretin (2.2-8.7), 17.0 for methotrexate (10.6-23.4), 13.9 for etanercept (0.3-27.4), 19.3 for infliximab (0-45.8) and 4.6 for controls (CI, 4.3-5.0). No cases of HZ were seen among patients treated with alefacept, efalizumab or adalimumab. In a multivariate analysis, age, female sex, healthcare utilization pattern and corticosteroid treatment were associated with the time to HZ infection. The association of HZ with infliximab approached statistical significance (Hazard ratio: 1.77, 95% CI: 0.92-3.43), but none of the other biologic drugs were significantly associated with the risk of HZ.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with psoriasis, treatment with some biologic drugs was associated with a higher incidence of HZ compared with controls, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Biological drugs targeting the immune response in the therapy of psoriasis

Chronic plaque psoriasis affects more than 2% of world population, has a chronic recurrent behavior, gives a heavy burden to the patients’ quality of life, and hence remains a huge medical and social problem. The clinical results of conventional therapies of psoriasis are not satisfactory. According to the current knowledge of the molecular and cellular basis of psoriasis, it is defined as an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory and hyperproliferative skin disease. A new generation of biological drugs, targeting molecules and cells involved into perturbed pro-inflammatory immune response in the psoriatic skin and joints, has been recently designed and applied clinically. These biological agents are bioengineered proteins such as chimeric and humanized antibodies and fusion proteins. In particular, they comprise the antitumor necrosis factor-α agents etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab, with clinical efficacy in both moderate-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, and the anti-CD11a efalizumab with selective therapeutic action exclusively in the skin. Here, we overview recent findings on the molecular pathways relevant to the inflammatory response in psoriasis and present our clinical experience with the drugs currently employed in the dermatologic manifestations, namely etanercept, infliximab, and efalizumab. The growing body of clinical data on the efficacy and safety of antipsoriasis biological drugs is reviewed as well. Particular focus is given to long-term safety concerns and feasibility of combined therapeutic protocols to ameliorate clinical results.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and newer biological agents

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease of the brain due to a polyoma virus, JC virus. Despite the ubiquity of this virus, PML is rare and almost always seen in association with an underlying immunosuppressive condition. In the last 30 years, AIDS has been the most common predisposing factor. The observation of PML attending the use of certain monoclonal antibody therapies and other pharmacological agents has raised concerns about the safety profile of these agents, but has also provided a window into the pathogenesis of PML. Certain agents, such as the monoclonal antibodies natalizumab, an α4β1 and α4β7 integrin inhibitor, and efalizumab, an antibody directed against CD11a, appear to uniquely predispose to PML. Prior to their introduction for multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease with respect to natalizumab, and psoriasis with respect to efalizumab, PML had never been observed with these disorders. PML occurring with other agents that currently carry US FDA-mandated 'black-box' warnings, such as rituximab, an antibody directed to CD20, or mycophenolate mofetil, a drug that inhibits T- and B-cell proliferation, typically occur in the background of underlying disorders that have already been identified as risks for PML. This review will focus on the available data regarding the risk for PML with monoclonal antibodies and other drugs. A biologically plausible explanation for the increased risk of PML will be proposed, as well as potential strategies for mitigating disease risk.

Translating costimulation blockade to the clinic: lessons learned from three pathways

SUMMARY

As the recognition that costimulatory signals are critical for optimal T-cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation, there has been an explosion in the study of costimulatory molecules and their roles in enhancing anti-donor T-cell responses following transplantation. Here, we focus on the bench-to-beside translation of blocking agents designed to target three critical costimulatory pathways: the CD28/CD80/CD86 pathway, the CD154/CD40 pathway, and the lymphocyte function associated antigen-1/intercellular adhesion molecule pathway. While blockade of each of these pathways proved promising in inhibiting donor-reactive T-cell responses and promoting long-term graft survival in murine models of transplantation, the progression of development of therapeutic agents to block these pathways has each taken a slightly different course. Both logistical and biological pitfalls have accompanied the translation of blockers of all three pathways into clinically applicable therapies, and the development of costimulatory blockade as a substitute for current standard-of-care calcineurin inhibitors has by no means reached completion. Collaboration between both the basic and clinical arenas will further propel the development of costimulation blockers currently in the pipeline, as well as of novel methods to target these critical pathways during transplantation.

Infectious complications associated with monoclonal antibodies and related small molecules

Biologics are increasingly becoming part of routine disease management. As more agents are developed, the challenge of keeping track of indications and side effects is growing. While biologics represent a milestone in targeted and specific therapy, they are not without drawbacks, and the judicious use of these "magic bullets" is essential if their full potential is to be realized. Infectious complications in particular are not an uncommon side effect of therapy, whether as a direct consequence of the agent or because of the underlying disease process. With this in mind, we have reviewed and summarized the risks of infection and the infectious disease-related complications for all FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies and some related small molecules, and we discuss the probable mechanisms involved in immunosuppression as well as recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of specific disease entities.

Efalizumab in the treatment of psoriasis: mode of action, clinical indications, efficacy, and safety

Efalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD11a subunit of the lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1. It has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Efalizumab has been shown in several clinical trials to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The safety profile of continuous therapy with efalizumab--as far as it is currently available--is favorable. Mode of action, pharmacological profile, clinical indications and efficacy, safety, and tolerability as well as practical considerations of efalizumab are reviewed in this article.

Balancing immunity and immunosuppression: vaccinating patients receiving treatment with efalizumab

Although effective in the treatment of immunodysregulatory diseases such as psoriasis, targeted immunosuppressive agents may confer risks of both enhanced susceptibility to infection and decreased responsiveness to vaccination. In a recent study, Krueger et al. (this issue) investigated these issues by testing the immune response to both a model antigen and a therapeutic vaccination in psoriasis patients during and after treatment with an LFA-1 inhibitor, efalizumab.

Effect of therapeutic integrin (CD11a) blockade with efalizumab on immune responses to model antigens in humans: results of a randomized, single blind study

Efalizumab is a humanized monoclonal CD11a antibody approved for treatment of psoriasis. Its immunomodulatory effects led us study how immune responses are modified and the possible consequences for vaccinations in clinical practice. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 12 weeks of subcutaneous efalizumab treatment of patients with moderate psoriasis. Bacteriophage phiX174 was used as a model neoantigen to assess T-cell-dependent humoral immunity. Tetanus booster vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, and intracutaneous skin tests were administered to further evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses. During efalizumab treatment, both primary and secondary antibody responses to phiX174, including IgM/IgG isotype switch, were reduced. There appeared to be naïve T-cell anergy to a neoantigen (phiX174) during active CD11a blockade, without tolerance to the antigen after efalizumab withdrawal. Secondary humoral immune responses to tetanus booster during treatment were reduced, but antibody titer increases led to protective levels. Responses to pneumococcal vaccination 6 weeks after withdrawal from efalizumab were not affected. Cellular immune responses to intracutaneous recall antigens were reduced during treatment and returned to pretreatment conditions after withdrawal. These results expand our knowledge of how immune responses are modulated in humans by CD11a blockade and have implications for vaccinations of patients treated with this agent.

The Greek experience with efalizumab in psoriasis from a University Dermatologic Hospital

BACKGROUND

Efalizumab (anti-CD11a antibody) targets T cell-mediated steps important in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. As efalizumab is intended to be administered on a continuous long-term basis in psoriasis, it is important to share experience concerning issues commonly occurring during its use in real daily practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of efalizumab treatment in Greek patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and to investigate whether there are specific characteristics that predict the clinical outcome of therapy.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, who had failed to respond to, or had a contraindication to, or were intolerant to other systemic therapies, received efalizumab (1 mg kg(-1) per week) for 12 weeks or more.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of efalizumab treatment, 65% of patients achieved 50% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and 39% achieved at least 75% reduction in PASI score. The mean percentage PASI improvement from baseline was 62%. The most common side effects were a flu-like syndrome, a transient localized papular eruption, leucocytosis and lymphocytosis. There was no correlation between the occurrence of these side effects and the clinical response. Patients with a past history of unstable types of psoriasis were likely poor responders to efalizumab, and at an increased risk of developing generalized inflammatory flare.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm previous reports suggesting that treatment with efalizumab is an efficacious and safe option for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. A detailed previous history of psoriasis is important in order to select possible candidates for efalizumab therapy.

Efalizumab in routine use: a clinical experience

With the advent of biological therapies, continuous long-term control of psoriasis is now becoming a reality. We report our experience with biologics based on the treatment of more than 550 psoriatic patients with such compounds at our special outpatient care center of Bio-Immunotherapy at the Department of Dermatology of the Medical University of Vienna. Approximately 220 of these patients are currently receiving efalizumab. In our hands, efalizumab was generally found to be safe and well tolerated and, after 12 weeks of treatment, resulted in a PASI reduction of 50% or more in approximately two-thirds of patients treated. In most of these 'early' responders, the therapeutic efficacy of efalizumab can be maintained for a prolonged period of time, in certain patients up to 36 months. Flares occurring during long-term therapy were rare and, in most instances, triggered by infections. During such flares, we usually do not discontinue efalizumab therapy, but rather try to combat the infection by appropriate antibiotics and to control the activity of the cutaneous eruption by the addition of topical (corticosteroids) and, when needed, systemic (e.g. methotrexate 15-20 mg week(-1) for 8-10 weeks) medication. In such a situation, it is of utmost importance for the care-taking physician to closely communicate with the affected patients in a scientifically competent fashion and to have an open ear for their concerns. This helps and improves patient compliance and minimizes the need for treatment discontinuation.

Long-term treatment of plaque psoriasis with efalizumab: an Italian experience

Biologic agents are an important new class of drugs, offering targeted treatment for chronic skin diseases such as psoriasis. The biologic therapy efalizumab is an anti-CD11a monoclonal antibody, which was approved by the European regulatory agency in 2004 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Here we describe our 2-year experience in treating over 100 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis with efalizumab at two dermatology centres in Italy. Overall, we found efalizumab is efficacious for a large subset of patients, regardless of previous therapies received, and has an easily manageable safety profile. We believe one important quality of efalizumab is the stability and maintenance of clinical response over time. We found that most patients who respond to treatment experience a long-term clearing of psoriasis with only mild recurrence events. Our experience with individual cases provides specific insights into efalizumab re-treatment, the use of efalizumab in patients with a history of heart failure, and the management of patients who become pregnant or conceive while receiving efalizumab therapy. In summary, our off-trial experience in over 100 patients confirms the efficacy and safety of efalizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Same efficacies of ipratropium and salbutamol in reversing methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Efficacy of salbutamol (S) was compared to that of ipratropium (I) or to their association, after methacholine challenge testing (MCT). MCT was performed in 4 groups of 10 patients suspected to suffer from asthma; mean changes in FEV1, maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMFR), and airway resistance (Raw) were the same in all groups. After MCT, the group 1 patients inhaled S and then I, 10 min later; both drugs were given in the reverse order to the group 2 patients. The group 3 patients inhaled a mixture of both drugs just after MCT; the group 4 patients were not given any bronchodilator till the 20th min after MCT, when they inhaled S. Short-term (10 min) bronchodilator effects of S, I or S + I on spirometric variables were of the same magnitude and Raw returned to its baseline value. Further improvement (10-20 min) in FEV1 was mainly due to spontaneous recovery, whereas further increase in MMFR was due also to bronchodilator actions of drugs. It is concluded that ipratropium could be proposed as an alternative bronchodilator to salbutamol after MCT.

[Efalizumab]

Efalizumab (Raptiva, Serono) is a humanised monoclonal antibody (IgG1) produced by biotechnology. This antibody has a novel place among biotherapies for psoriasis. It is bound to the CD11a subunit of a surface molecule of the T lymphocyte LFA-1 (Leucocyte Function-associated Antigen-1). This molecule is essential for binding of T lymphocytes to the ICAM-1 molecule (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1) found on antigen-presenting cells, endothelial cells and keratinocytes. Binding of efalizumab to CD11a prevents binding of LFA-1 to ICAM-1, thus inhibiting several steps in the immunological process responsible for formation of psoriatic plaque (activation of naive T lymphocytes to memory T lymphocytes, lymphocyte migration and reactivation of T lymphocytes in skin). Efalizumab was approved in the United States by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2003 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis requiring systemic therapy. It may be used as first-line therapy in the United States in this indication. In France, marketing authorisation (MA) was granted more recently in September 2005. The indications are moderate-to-severe cutaneous plaque psoriasis in adults in cases of failure, intolerance or contraindication of at least two systemic treatments including phototherapy, methotrexate and cyclosporine. Current clinical trial data is available for 3500 patients with plaque psoriasis. A 75% improvement in PASI score was seen in between 22 and 39% of patients treated with efalizumab (vs. 2 to 5% for patients on placebo) in a single weekly subcutaneous injection (1 mg/kg). A study in good responders confirms the continuing long-term efficacy of prescription of the drug up to 36 months (with at least a 75% improvement in PASI score in 53% of patients). However, it is not effective against joint involvement in psoriasis. The most common side-effects (incidence >1/100) are influenza-like syndrome, risk of outbreak of cutaneous psoriasis during or after discontinuation of treatment, worsening of arthralgia, minor hypersensitivity reactions, reversible changes in laboratory values (hyperlymphocytosis, elevated alkaline phosphatases and transaminases). Because of rare cases of thrombocytopenia (incidence<1/100), reversible on discontinuation of treatment, monthly monitoring of platelet counts is required over the first 3 months of therapy. There are currently no randomised studies comparing the various systemic treatments (standard therapy and biotherapy) for psoriasis. However, on extrapolation of the available results concerning efficacy (PASI-75 after 12 weeks of treatment), efalizumab appears to be less efficacious than anti-TNF alpha agents. This drug constitutes an additional treatment option and its position in the therapeutic arsenal will depend upon its long-term benefit/risk ratio in relation to other biotherapies.