Pharmacokinetic Comparison of 2 Formulations of Anastrozole (1 mg) in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers: A Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Period, 2-Sequence, Crossover Study

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Safety With Bioequivalence of Anastrozole in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: Bioequivalence Study Findings

Anastrozole is a third-generation aromatase inhibitor that exerts potent anti-breast cancer effects. This trial aimed to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety with bioequivalence of orally administered anastrozole provided by 2 sponsors in healthy volunteers.Two separate open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover-design studies consisting of a fasting study (n = 23) and a fed study (n = 23, 1 participant withdrew before taking medication) were conducted. In each study, healthy volunteers were randomized to receive the test product (Haizheng Pharmaceutical Group) followed by the reference drug (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP), or vice versa. Each study subject received a 1-mg anastrozole tablet with a 21-day washout. The plasma concentrations of anastrozole were measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and PK parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis. Forty-six healthy female volunteers were enrolled. For patients enrolled in the fasting study, the mean age was 55.0 years, mean weight was 57.1 kg, mean body mass index was 23.6 kg/m² , and mean height was 155.5 cm. For patients enrolled in the fed study, the mean age was 54.2 years, mean weight was 55.9 kg, mean body mass index was 23.9 kg/m² _, and mean height was 152.8 cm. All PK end points met the predefined criteria for PK equivalence. In fasting subjects, the median maximum plasma concentration was 23.4 and 22.6 at 1 hour for test and reference formulations, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration in fed subjects was 18.7 and 18.5 at 4 hours for test and reference formulations, respectively. Both fasting and fed studies achieved plausible bioequivalence. Anastrozole was well tolerated and exhibited a favorable safety profile at the prescribed doses. The severity of observed adverse events assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version CTCAE4.03) was mild, and some of the adverse events were not caused by anastrozole. Furthermore, the results of our study under fasting and fed conditions demonstrated bioequivalence of the test and reference products.

Bioequivalence of Oral Formulations of Anastrozole in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Period, Two-Sequence Crossover Study

Anastrozole is currently used as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. A generic anastrozole tablet was developed to offer an alternative to the marketed tablet formulation. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the bioequivalence between the test and reference formulations of anastrozole in a single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study with a 14-day washout interval. A total of 20 healthy male Chinese volunteers were enrolled and completed the study, after oral administration of a single dose of 1.0-mg test and reference formulations of anastrozole. The blood samples were collected at different times and were determined by a fully validated high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters, including C_max , AUC_0-t , and AUC_0-∞ , were assessed for bioequivalence based on current guidelines. The observed pharmacokinetic parameters of anastrozole of the test drug were similar to those of the reference formulation. The 90% confidence intervals of test/reference ratios for C_max , AUC_0-t , and AUC_0-∞ were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80%-125%. The results obtained from these healthy Chinese subjects in this study suggest that the test formulation of anastrozole 1.0-mg tablet is bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Arimidex 1.0-mg tablet).

Coadministration of anastrozole sustains therapeutic testosterone levels in hypogonadal men undergoing testosterone pellet insertion

INTRODUCTION

Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for hypogonadism involve testosterone (T) replacement. Testosterone pellets (TP) require a minor office procedure every 3 to 4 months. The need for repeated insertions increases the likelihood of a complication. Anastrozole (AZ) is an aromatase inhibitor that has been used off-label for the treatment of male hypogonadism. AZ increases T levels by lowering serum estradiol (E2) levels and increasing gonadotropin (GTP) levels.

AIM

We hypothesized that the concomitant use of AZ with TP insertions would sustain therapeutic T levels and increase the interval between TP insertions.

METHODS

Men treated with TP for hypogonadism at an academic center were offered AZ (1 mg/day) at the time of TP reinsertion as a way of potentially decreasing the frequency of TP insertions. Total T (TT), free T (FT), sex hormone binding globulin, E2, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone FSH levels were obtained prior to T replacement and at 6 and 15 weeks from TP insertion. Men were re-implanted at 16 weeks if their TT levels were less than 350 ng/dL and their symptoms recurred. We retrospectively reviewed our records of men who underwent TP, TP, and AZ from 2011 to 2012. Demographics, TT, FT, LH, FSH, and E2 levels were recorded. Data were analyzed with anova and a Tukey's test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

TT level at 6, 15, or >15 weeks from TP insertion.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight men with 65 insertions were analyzed. The TP AZ group had significantly higher TT and FT levels than the TP group at >120 days (P < 0.05). The TP group had significantly higher E2 levels at all time points (P < 0.01). GTP levels remained stable in the TP AZ group. Average time to reinsertion in TP AZ was 198 days vs. 128 days in the TP group.

CONCLUSION

Men on TP AZ maintain therapeutic T levels longer than men on TP alone and have significantly less GTP suppression.

Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Anticancer Therapies

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) provides valuable guidance for dose adjustment of antibiotics, immunosuppressives, antiepileptics, and other drugs, but its use for traditional anticancer therapies has been limited. Perhaps the most important obstacle is the impractical requirement of multiple blood samples to adequately define systemic exposure of drugs that have a short elimination half-life and are given by intermittent intravenous injections. However, the newer targeted anticancer therapies have different pharmacokinetic (PK) and dosing characteristics compared with traditional cytotoxic drugs, making it possible to estimate the steady-state drug exposure with a single trough-level measurement. Recent evidence indicates that certain PK parameters, including trough levels, are correlated with clinical outcomes for many of these agents, including imatinib, sunitinib, rituximab, and cetuximab. Although the current evidence is insufficient to mandate TDM in routine practice, a concerted investigation should be encouraged to determine whether the steady-state trough measurements of targeted agents will have a practical place in the clinical care of patients with cancer.