1
|
Guohui J, Kun W, Dong T, Ji Z, Dong L, Dong W, Jingyu C. Microbiosis in lung allotransplantation and xenotransplantation: State of the art and future perspective. HEALTH CARE SCIENCE 2022; 1:119-128. [PMID: 38938886 PMCID: PMC11080722 DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
The respiratory tract is known to harbor a microbial community including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. New techniques contribute enormously to the identification of unknown or culture-independent species and reveal the interaction of the community with the host immune system. The existing respiratory microbiome and substantial equilibrium of the transplanted microbiome from donor lung grafts provide an extreme bloom of dynamic changes in the microenvironment in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. Dysbiosis in grafts are not only related to the modified microbial components but also involve the kinetics of the host-graft "talk," which signifies the destination of graft allograft injury, acute rejection, infection, and chronic allograft dysfunction development in short- and long-term survival. Microbiome-derived factors may contribute to lung xenograft survival when using genetically multimodified pig-derived organs. Here, we review the most advanced knowledge of the dynamics and resilience of microbial communities in transplanted lungs with various pretransplant indications. Conceptual and analytical points of view have been illustrated along the time series, gaining insight into the microbiome and lung grafts. Future endeavors on precise tools, sophisticated models, and novel targeted regimens are needed to improve the long-term survival in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Guohui
- Center for Medical Device Evaluation, NMPABeijingChina
| | - Wu Kun
- Center for Medical Device Evaluation, NMPABeijingChina
| | - Tian Dong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Zhang Ji
- Wuxi Lung Transplant Center, Wuxi People's Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical UniversityWuxiChina
| | - Liu Dong
- Wuxi Lung Transplant Center, Wuxi People's Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical UniversityWuxiChina
| | - Wei Dong
- Wuxi Lung Transplant Center, Wuxi People's Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical UniversityWuxiChina
| | - Chen Jingyu
- Wuxi Lung Transplant Center, Wuxi People's Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical UniversityWuxiChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Microbiome analysis, the immune response and transplantation in the era of next generation sequencing. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:883-901. [PMID: 34364710 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The human gastrointestinal tract, skin and mucosal surfaces are inhabited by a complex system of bacteria, viruses, fungi, archaea, protists, and eukaryotic parasites with predominance of bacteria and bacterial viruses (bacteriophages). Collectively these microbes form the microbiota of the microecosystem of humans. Recent advancement in technologies for nucleic acid isolation from various environmental samples, feces and body secretions and advancements in shotgun throughput massive parallel DNA and RNA sequencing along with 16S ribosomal gene sequencing have unraveled the identity of otherwise unknown microbial entities constituting the human microecosystem. The improved transcriptome analysis, technological developments in biochemical analytical methods and availability of complex bioinformatics tools have allowed us to begin to understand the metabolome of the microbiome and the biochemical pathways and potential signal transduction pathways in human cells in response to microbial infections and their products. Also, developments in human whole genome sequencing, targeted gene sequencing of histocompatibility genes and other immune response associated genes by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) have allowed us to have a better conceptualization of immune responses, and alloimmune responses. These modern technologies have enabled us to dive into the intricate relationship between commensal symbiotic and pathogenic microbiome and immune system. For the most part, the commensal symbiotic microbiota helps to maintain normal immune homeostasis besides providing healthy nutrients, facilitating digestion, and protecting the skin, mucosal and intestinal barriers. However, changes in diets, administration of therapeutic agents like antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, immunosuppressants etc. along with certain host factors including human histocompatibility antigens may alter the microbial ecosystem balance by causing changes in microbial constituents, hierarchy of microbial species and even dysbiosis. Such alterations may cause immune dysregulation, breach of barrier protection and lead to immunopathogenesis rather than immune homeostasis. The effects of human microbiome on immunity, health and disease are currently under intense research with cutting edge technologies in molecular biology, biochemistry, and bioinformatics along with tremendous ability to characterize immune response at single cell level. This review will discuss the contemporary status on human microbiome immune system interactions and their potential effects on health, immune homeostasis and allograft transplantation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Goeser F, Sifft B, Stein-Thoeringer C, Farowski F, Strassburg CP, Brossart P, Higgins PG, Scheid C, Wolf D, Holderried TAW, Vehreschild MJGT, Cruz Aguilar MR. Fecal microbiota transfer for refractory intestinal graft-versus-host disease - Experience from two German tertiary centers. Eur J Haematol 2021; 107:229-245. [PMID: 33934412 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Steroid refractory graft-vs-host disease (sr-GvHD) represents a challenging complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Intestinal microbiota (IM) diversity and dysbiosis were identified as influencing factors for the development of acute GvHD. Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is hypothesized to restore IM dysbiosis, but there is limited knowledge about the significance of FMT in the treatment of sr-GvHD. OBJECTIVES We studied the effects of FMT on sr-GvHD in allo-HCT patients from two German tertiary clinical centers (n = 11 patients; period: March 2017 until July 2019). To assess safety and clinical efficacy, we analyzed clinical data pre- and post-FMT (day -14 to +30 relative to FMT). Moreover, IM were analyzed in donor samples and in a subset of patients pre- and post-FMT by 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS Post-FMT, we observed no intervention-associated, systemic inflammatory responses and only minor side effects (5/11 patients: abdominal pain and transformation of peristalsis-each 3/11 and vomiting-1/11). Stool frequencies and volumes were significantly reduced [pre- vs post-FMT (d14): P < .05, respectively] as well as clear attenuation regarding both grading and staging of sr-GvHD was present upon FMT. Moreover, IM analyses revealed an increase of alpha diversity as well as a compositional shifts toward the donor post-FMT. CONCLUSIONS In our study, we observed positive effects on sr-GVHD after FMT without the occurrence of major adverse events. Although these findings are in line with published data on beneficial effects of FMT in sr-GvHD, further randomized clinical studies are urgently needed to better define the clinical validity including mode of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Goeser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,German Clinical Microbiome Study Group (GCMSG), Germany
| | - Barbara Sifft
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Fedja Farowski
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,German Clinical Microbiome Study Group (GCMSG), Germany.,Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Paul G Higgins
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Scheid
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dominik Wolf
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,UKIM 5, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias A W Holderried
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,German Clinical Microbiome Study Group (GCMSG), Germany.,Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marta Rebeca Cruz Aguilar
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Germany.,German Clinical Microbiome Study Group (GCMSG), Germany.,Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trøseid M, Mayerhofer CCK, Broch K, Arora S, Svardal A, Hov JR, Andreassen AK, Gude E, Karason K, Dellgren G, Berge RK, Gullestad L, Aukrust P, Ueland T. The carnitine-butyrobetaine-TMAO pathway after cardiac transplant: Impact on cardiac allograft vasculopathy and acute rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38:1097-1103. [PMID: 31301965 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alterations in the partly microbiota-dependent carnitine-γ-butyrobetaine (γBB)-trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) pathway have been linked to the progression of heart failure and atherosclerotic disease. We evaluated if circulating γBB, TMAO, and their common precursors carnitine and trimethyllysine (TML) were dysregulated after heart transplantation and associated with development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and acute rejection. METHODS We measured these metabolites in plasma from heart transplant recipients with everolimus-based (n = 32) and standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (n = 30) at different time-points and accompanied by assessment of CAV by intravascular ultrasound. RESULTS Baseline levels of carnitine, TMAO, and TML were elevated in heart transplant recipients compared with controls, and TML remained elevated throughout the observation period. The microbiota-dependent metabolite γBB increased steadily during 3 years of follow-up, with a similar decrease in its endogenous precursor TML. The increase in γBB and the change in TML were associated with a change in total atheroma volume from baseline to 3 years. Increases in γBB and carnitine levels from baseline to 1 year were associated with an increased frequency of acute rejection within the first year after heart transplant. CONCLUSIONS Our study reveals alterations of the carnitine-γBB-TMAO pathway after heart transplant, with increasing levels of γBB being associated with acute rejection and increase in total atheroma volume during 3 years of follow-up. Future studies should clarify whether interactions between dietary factors, immunosuppressive drugs, and the gut microbiota could influence acute rejection and CAV development to delineate mechanisms and potential novel treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Trøseid
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine; Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases; Norwegian PSC Research Center and Section of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Cristiane C K Mayerhofer
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine; K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaspar Broch
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Satish Arora
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asbjørn Svardal
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Johannes R Hov
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine; Norwegian PSC Research Center and Section of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arne K Andreassen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Gude
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristjan Karason
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gøran Dellgren
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rolf K Berge
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Gullestad
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Aukrust
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine; Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases; K.G. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Centre, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Thor Ueland
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Centre, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|