Management of Myeloma Manifestations and Complications: The Cornerstone of Supportive Care: Recommendation of the Canadian Myeloma Research Group (formerly Myeloma Canada Research Network) Consensus Guideline Consortium

Practical management of disease-related manifestations and drug toxicities in patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a very heterogeneous disease with multiple symptoms and clinical manifestations. MM affects mainly elderly patients and is difficult to manage in the presence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, frailty and adverse events of disease-targeted drugs. The rapid changes in MM treatment resulting from constant innovations in this area, together with the introduction of numerous new drugs with distinct mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, have led to an increased complexity in the therapeutic decision-making and patient management processes. The prolonged exposure to novel agents, sometimes in combination with conventional therapies, makes this management even more challenging. A careful balance between treatment efficacy and its tolerability should be considered for every patient. During treatment, a close monitoring of comorbidities, disease-related manifestations and treatment side effects is recommended, as well as a proactive approach, with reinforcement of information and patient awareness for the early recognition of adverse events, allowing prompt therapeutic adjustments. In this review, we discuss various issues that must be considered in the treatment of MM patients, while giving practical guidance for monitoring, prevention and management of myeloma-related manifestations and treatment-related toxicities.

Quantitative risk factor analysis of prior disease condition and socioeconomic status with the multiple myeloma development: nationwide cohort study

Early diagnosis and following management are important determinants of the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM). However, screening for MM is not routinely performed because it is rare disease. In this study, we evaluated the association of prior disease condition and socioeconomic status (SES) with MM diagnosis and developed a simple predictive model that can identify patients at high risk of developing MM who may need screening using nationwide database from South Korea. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, eight prior disease conditions and SES before diagnosis were shown to be predictors of MM development and selected for score development. Total prediction scores were categorized into four groups: patients without any risk (≤ 0) intermediate-1 (0.5-9), intermediate-2 (9-14), and high risk (> 14). The odds ratios for developing MM in the intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk groups were 1.29, 3.07, and 4.62, respectively. The association of prior disease conditions and SES with MM diagnosis were demonstrated and the simple scoring system to predict the MM risk was developed. This scoring system is also provided by web-based application and could be a useful tool to support clinicians in identifying potential candidates for MM screening.

Efficacy and safety of daratumumab in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab as a monoclonal antibody has shown promising results in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the efficacy and safety of daratumumab-based regimens compared to control regimens have not been fully established.

METHODS

The search was conducted using electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases) up to December 2022. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in the treatment of RRMM. Data were extracted from eligible studies and were presented as hazard ratio or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 5 randomized controlled trials comprising 2003 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that daratumumab-based regimens significantly improved progression-free survival compared to control regimens (hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.60, P < .00001). Additionally, daratumumab-based regimens significantly improved overall response rate compared to control regimens (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.16-1.36, P < .00001). the rate of minimal residual disease was also significantly higher in the daratumumab-based regimens (RR = 6.10, 95% CI 4.09-9.11, P < .00001). However, there was an increased risk of pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, and diarrhea in the daratumumab-based regimens.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that daratumumab-based regimens are effective in the treatment of RRMM, improving progression-free survival, minimal residual disease, and overall response rate. However, there is an increased risk of pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, and diarrhea. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of daratumumab in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Real-world patient-reported outcomes and concordance between patient and physician reporting of side effects across lines of therapy in multiple myeloma within the USA

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient and physician concordance of side effects perception across lines of therapy (LOT) in multiple myeloma (MM) within the United States of America (USA).

METHODS

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World MM III Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of hemato-oncologists/hematologists and their patients with MM conducted in the USA between August 2020 and July 2021. Physicians reported patient characteristics and side effects. Patients reported side-effect bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using validated PRO tools (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire/-MM Module [EORTC QLQ-C30/-MY20], EQ-5D-3L and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Population physical item 5). Descriptive, linear regression and concordance analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Records from 63 physicians and 132 patients with MM were analyzed. EORTC QLQ-C30/-MY20 and EQ-5D-3L scores were consistent across LOTs. Scores tended to be worse with higher side-effect bother; patients "very much" bothered by side effects had lower median (interquartile range) global health status scores (33.3 [25.0-50.0]) than those "not at all" bothered (79.2 [66.7-83.3]). Patient and physician concordance on side-effect reporting was poor to fair. Patients frequently reported fatigue and nausea as bothersome side effects.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL of patients with MM was worse with greater side-effect bother. Discordant patient and physician reporting of side effects indicated a need for improved communication during management of MM.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of multiple myeloma treatments based on thalidomide and bortezomib: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2020 in a Brazilian metropolis

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of plasma cells; the survival of which has improved over the years with the emergence of new treatments. In Brazil, the availability of treatment-regimens is different from developed countries. Real-world evidence with Brazilian patients is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of MM treatments in a Brazilian metropolis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study with MM patients, beginning MM treatment from 2009 to 2020 (i.e., before bortezomib became available in public health services). Patients' medical records were revised to obtain clinical variables. The primary outcomes were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS, measured as time to next treatment), and the secondary outcomes were Adverse Events (AE). Kaplan-Meier curves were obtained and the Cox proportional hazards model was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses. The incidence of AE was estimated and the chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the association between AE and MM regimens.

RESULTS

In total, 278 patients participated in the study with median age of 64 years; 50.4 % were females, 55.8 % attended a private clinic, 34.9 % received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 32.4 % were on polypharmacy. Most patients from public services used thalidomide-based regimens (40.3 %) and at private clinics used bortezomib-based regimens (38.1 %) as first-line treatment. Patients had a median OS of 99 months. Patients had median PFS of 28 months in first-line treatment, which was significantly different for age (p = 0.0055), polypharmacy (p = 0.0094) and ASCT (p < 0.0001). PFS was independently associated to polypharmacy and ASCT. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy (39.6 %) was high. In contrast, the incidence of severe AE was low. We found significant difference between first-line T + B-based regimens and leukopenia (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that patients on polypharmacy and who did not receive ASCT had worse PFS. Similar to other Latin countries, most patients used thalidomide- and bortezomib-based regimens as first-line treatments having similar OS and PFS. Treatments were considered relatively safe, especially regarding serious AE.

Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review for General Practitioners in Oncology

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant clonal plasma cell disorder in the bone marrow and is the second-most common hematologic malignancy in adults. Although patients with MM have a moderate life expectancy, it remains a heterogeneous disease that often requires multiple lines of chemotherapy for durable control and long-term survival. This review outlines current management strategies for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients as well as for relapsed and refractory disease. Advances in drug therapies have widened management options and improved survival. In this paper, we also discuss implications for special populations and survivorship care.

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Recommendations from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium

Although the availability of effective novel treatments has positively impacted the quality of life and survival of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, benefits in the transplant ineligible MM population may be limited by functional/frailty status. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium proposes consensus recommendations for the first-line treatment of transplant ineligible MM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document further focuses on eligibility for transplant, frailty assessment, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Consensus Guideline Consortium will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Baseline peripheral neuropathy was associated with age and a prognostic factor in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell hematological malignancy. Bortezomib has become the primary drug in the treatment of patients with MM. However, its negative effects, especially peripheral neuropathy (PN), affect the patients’ life quality and treatment continuity. However, there are few studies on baseline PN of MM, and little is known of the impact of baseline PN on the prognosis of MM patients. Therefore, we reviewed the clinical data of newly diagnosed MM patients in our center, explored the influencing factors of baseline PN, and evaluated PN’s influence on the prognosis of MM patients undergoing induction therapy with bortezomib. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 155 MM patients were eligible for the retrospective study. The multivariate regression analysis, generalized additive fitting smooth curve, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and K-M curve were conducted in this study. We found that baseline PN in patients with MM was age-related; MM patients with baseline PN have more severe bortezomib induced PN (BiPN) during the four courses of induction therapy with bortezomib as the primary regimen and worse PN outcome after induction therapy. Additionally, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of MM patients with baseline PN were worse than those of the MM patients without baseline PN.