R-CHOP Vs DA-EPOCH-R for Double-Expressor Lymphoma: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis

Zanubrutinib plus R-CHOP for the treatment of newly diagnosed double-expressor lymphoma: A phase 2 clinical study

BACKGROUND

Double-expressor lymphoma (DEL) has a poorer prognosis than other subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical study initiated by investigators to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined zanubrutinib with R-CHOP, which includes rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone for patients with DEL (stage II or more), as well as to explore factors related to efficacy preliminarily.

METHODS

From November 2020 to July 2022, 48 newly diagnosed patients were enrolled. All patients received twice-daily oral zanubrutinib (160 mg) for 6 months and standardized R-CHOP regimen for six to eight cycles.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was 89.6%, with a complete response rate (CRR) of 83.3%. The median follow-up was 29.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The PFS and OS were 81.25% and 93.75% at 2 years, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 of 48 (47.9%) patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) results of 33 patients showed that TP53, MYD88, and PIM1 were the most common mutated gene. Multivariate analysis revealed that BCL-6 gene rearrangement was an adverse prognostic factor for both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.247; 95% confidence article [CI], 0.068-0.9; p = .034) and OS (HR, 0.057; 95% CI, 0.006-0.591; p = .016), whereas the number of extranodal involvements also significantly influenced OS (HR, 15.12; 95% CI, 1.07-213.65; p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Zanubrutinib in combination with R-CHOP is an effective option for DEL patients, and the toxicity of zanubrutinib is entirely acceptable for patients.

Prognosis and complete remission rate of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in standard R-CHOP with reduction of vincristine: A retrospective study

Background and Aims

The effect of stopping or reducing the dose of vincristine in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) on the outcome and prognosis of the disease is still in doubt. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the prognosis and complete remission of two R-CHOP treatment regimens with and without vincristine reduction in DLBCL patients.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on newly diagnosed DLBCL patients during 2018-2021. The patients were over 18 years of age, had been histologically confirmed by a pathologist, and were under treatment with R-CHOP regimen. The clinical information of the subjects as well as the number of treatment courses were extracted from their medical records and then compared.

Results

Overall, 269 patients with DLBCL were included in this study, 15.99% of whom (n = 43) had vincristine reduction. There was no significant difference between the studied factors regarding the reduction of vincristine and the complete R-CHOP regimen (p > 0.05). Besides, no difference was observed in the 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the two groups treated with R-CHOP regimen with and without vincristine reduction (p > 0.05). The complete remission rates of the patients treated with R-CHOP regimen with and without vincristine (p > 0.05) were not different either. The results of the Cox multivariate regression showed that reducing the dose of vincristine from the R-CHOP treatment regimen had no relationship with the 1-year OS and PFS of the DLBCL patients (hazard ratio [HR]OS = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.67-0.690, HRPFS = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.798-3.82).

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the reduction of vincristine from the R-CHOP regimen in the DLBCL patients was not likely to make a difference in the 1-year OS and PFS of the patients. However, further studies are needed on the issue.

Report of consensus panel 2 from the 11th international workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia on the management of relapsed or refractory WM patients

The consensus panel 2 (CP2) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) has reviewed and incorporated current data to update the recommendations for treatment approaches in patients with relapsed or refractory WM (RRWM). The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP2 include: (1) Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and/or a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (cBTKi) strategies are important options; their use should reflect the prior upfront strategy and are subject to their availability. (2) In selecting treatment, biological age, co-morbidities and fitness are important; nature of relapse, disease phenotype and WM-related complications, patient preferences and hematopoietic reserve are also critical factors while the composition of the BM disease and mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4, TP53) should also be noted. (3) The trigger for initiating treatment in RRWM should utilize knowledge of patients' prior disease characteristics to avoid unnecessary delays. (4) Risk factors for cBTKi related toxicities (cardiovascular dysfunction, bleeding risk and concurrent medication) should be addressed when choosing cBTKi. Mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4) may influence the cBTKi efficacy, and the role of TP53 disruptions requires further study) in the event of cBTKi failure dose intensity could be up titrated subject to toxicities. Options after BTKi failure include CIT with a non-cross-reactive regimen to one previously used CIT, addition of anti-CD20 antibody to BTKi, switching to a newer cBTKi or non-covalent BTKi, proteasome inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, and new anti-CD20 combinations are additional options. Clinical trial participation should be encouraged for all patients with RRWM.