Timing of PROTein INtake and clinical outcomes of adult critically ill patients on prolonged mechanical VENTilation: The PROTINVENT retrospective study

Macronutrient intake is different across Europe: Results of a Belgian cohort of critically ill adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is fundamental for ICU patients. This post-hoc subgroup analysis of the prospective observational EuroPN survey aimed to assess MNT in the participating Belgian ICUs.

METHODS

MNT practices in 9 Belgian ICUs (148 patients) were compared to 77 ICUs (1172 patients) from 11 European countries during the first 15 days for patients staying ≥5 days in ICU - and with the 2019 ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in ICU (<70 % of estimated energy expenditure in week 1 and up to 1.3 g/kg/d protein). Additionally, overfeeding was evaluated in the Belgian cohort.

RESULTS

The Belgian cohort had longer median ICU and hospital length of stay, higher emergency room admission rates and delayed MNT initiation compared to overall (EN: day 2.5 [2.0;4.0] vs 2.0 [2.0;4.0] and PN: day 5.0 [3.0,7.0] vs 2.0 [2.0,4.0]). They received more often EN than PN. In week 1 overfeeding was on average present in 30 % (energy) and 15 % (protein) of observation days.

CONCLUSION

Similar to overall, the Belgian subgroup received a daily average moderate caloric and low protein intake. The gradual intake increase aligned with ESPEN guidelines, though temporary overfeeding occurred in about one third of the patients.

Protective nutrition strategy in the acute phase of critical illness: why, what and how to protect

Nutritional support is crucial for critically ill patients. Recent clinical studies suggest that both overfeeding during the acute phase of critical illness and overly conservative or delayed nutritional therapy can pose significant risks. Given substantial individual variability among critically ill patients, it is challenging to prescribe universally applicable and objective feeding strategies; Instead, we pointed out which nutritional interventions were harmful. We also summarized the reasons for protective nutrition, and elaborated the advantages of protective nutrition from three perspectives: gastrointestinal protection, nutritional protection and metabolic protection. In particular, it is emphasized that overfeeding will lead to metabolic disorders, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy inhibition, ketogenic inhibition, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, etc. These detrimental processes can exacerbate one another, contributing to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and poorer clinical outcomes. We also propose protective nutrition strategies comparable to lung protective ventilation strategies, which may benefit patients. Vigilant monitoring during nutritional implementation is also paramount, enhancing awareness of adverse events for early diagnosis and intervention to mitigate their harm.

Urinary urea, nitrogen balance and mortality in critically ill patients - A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

nitrogen balance (NB) is the difference between nitrogen ingested and excreted, however its value as a prognostic marker in critically ill patients has yet to be determined. This study aimed to evaluate the association between NB, urinary parameters, and adverse outcomes among ICU patients.

METHODS

NB, urinary urea (UUE) and creatinine (UCE) excretion were recorded in the first week of ICU. The primary outcome was ICU mortality, and secondary outcomes were time on mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU and hospital length of stay and hospital mortality.

RESULTS

a total of 127 patients were included (58 ± 16 years, 87.4 % clinical admissions). Negative NB was observed in 77.2 % patients in the first and 47.2 % patients in the second measurement, with a protein intake of 40 (25-58) vs 86 (64-107) g/day. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were 22.0 % and 30.7 %. There was no identified cut-off point for sensibility and specificity in the ROC curves for NB and urinary parameters regarding ICU and hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

NB, UUE, or UCE were not associated with ICU or hospital mortality in our study. Further research is needed to evaluate the practical value of NB as a prognostic marker in ICU patients.

Novel Strategies to Promote Intensive Care Unit Recovery via Personalized Exercise, Nutrition, and Anabolic Interventions

Survivors of critical illness experience significant morbidity, reduced physiologic reserve, and long-term complications that negatively impact quality of life. Although rehabilitative treatments are beneficial during early recovery, there is limited evidence regarding effective multimodal rehabilitation, nutrition, and anabolic nutrient/agent strategies for improving long-term outcomes. This review discusses novel personalized rehabilitation, nutrition, and anabolic nutrient/agent (ie, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, testosterone) approaches that allow for precise exercise and nutrition prescription and have potential to improve patient care, address continued medical needs, and optimize long-term recovery. Continued research is needed to further evaluate effectiveness and implementation of these strategies throughout the continuum of care.

Protein Delivery in Critical Care- What Have Recent Trials Shown Us?

Determining the optimal protein intake for intensive care unit (ICU) and post-ICU patients is a multifaceted challenge. Firstly, it is essential to avoid both underdosing (<1.0 g/kg) and overdosing (>1.6 g/kg) of actual protein intake. Secondly, the actual protein intake may deviate from the prescribed amount. Thirdly, phenotyping and endotyping are becoming increasingly crucial in tailoring protein targets. Additionally, a gradual increase in protein intake is essential during the first 4 to 5 days of ICU stay. Furthermore, no established protein targets exist for post-ICU patients, indicating the need for nutritional intervention research to identify optimal protein intake strategies.

Why One-Size-Fits-All Doesn't Work in Intensive Care Unit Nutrition?

Nutrition therapy is a complex intervention with several underlying considerations that may influence effectiveness. Considerations include the mechanism of action of the intervention and the patient phenotype, including sex, ethnicity, body composition, and the patients' nutritional and inflammatory status. Energy and protein targets are elements of nutrition therapy that may be particularly influenced by individual patient factors. Biomarkers may provide a useful tool to monitor and individualize nutrition therapy in the future. The considerations mentioned, with many yet to be studied, highlight the rationale for more individualized interventions moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.

Skeletal Muscle: A Critical Organ for Survival and Recovery in Critical Illness

The intensive care unit (ICU) environment is one of the most challenging for skeletal muscle health. Atrophy associated with clinical care is distinct from that seen with inactivity or immobilization in the absence of disease and is exacerbated by aging. The substantial muscle loss in the ICU is likely due to the presence of inflammation, elevated proteolysis, bedrest, and undernutrition. Skeletal muscle parameters at admission are predictive of mortality and other clinically important outcomes. Treatment goals to mitigate muscle loss are early mobilization and adequate nutrient supply, especially protein, using an individualized approach to support skeletal muscle maintenance and recovery.

Malnutrition and perioperative nutritional rehabilitation in major operations

Background

Malnutrition is a potentially preventable risk factor for surgery. This systematic review examines nutritional management strategies aiming to enhance surgical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed for English-language studies published between July 1, 2004, and July 1, 2024, involving adult surgical patients. Study selection focused on four key themes: (1) nutritional screening and assessment, (2) preoperative nutritional therapy, (3) nutritional support in critically ill surgical patients, and (4) postoperative nutritional rehabilitation. Studies in non-surgical cohorts, letters, and case reports were excluded. Reference lists of relevant studies were manually screened for additional sources.

Results

Of 2763 studies identified, 251 met the inclusion criteria and 85 were added after manual screening, contributing to a total of 341 papers for the review. The prevalence of malnutrition varied widely by procedure, with the highest rates observed in pancreatic and esophagogastric operations. Preoperative malnutrition was strongly associated with increased postoperative complications, infections, prolonged hospital stay, and higher mortality. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) was effective in identifying at-risk patients. Preoperative nutritional interventions, including dietitian-led counseling, oral supplementation, and enteral or parenteral nutrition, may reduce complications and improve outcomes. Critically ill patients benefited from structured enteral and parenteral strategies. Early postoperative nutrition within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are linked to less complications and shorter hospital stay.

Conclusion

Malnutrition significantly impacts surgical outcomes, necessitating early identification and intervention. Standardized management is key to improving recovery and reducing complications. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic tools, assessing nutritional requirements, optimizing perioperative nutritional strategies, and establishing long-term nutritional follow-up guidelines for surgical patients.

The Impact of Early Protein Advancement in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Cardinality Matching Study

Background

Limited evidence is available regarding the safety and effectiveness of early high protein intake in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Therefore, this study aims to assess the safety of early protein advancement during nutritional support in these patients.

Methods

A multi-center retrospective cohort study included adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) at three centers in Saudi Arabia. Patients were grouped into two groups based on the protein intake at day three of feeding initiation into low protein (≤0.8 mg/kg/day) versus high protein (>0.8 mg/kg/day) groups. Acute kidney injury (AKI) during the ICU stay was the primary endpoint, while the remaining were considered secondary endpoints.

Results

The study included 466 patients, but after cardinality matching with a 2:1 ratio, 192 were in the lower protein group compared with 96 patients in the high protein group. The rate of AKI was low in the highprotein group compared with the low protein group on day three of feeding initiation (19.9% versus 12.7%); however, this was not statistically significant (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.26, 1.33; p=0.2). Additionally, patients in the high protein group had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation than those in the low protein group (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.18, 4.62; p=0.02). No differences were observed in 30-day and in-hospital mortality (HR1.33, 95% CI 0.91, 1.96; p=0.14 and HR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.72; p=0.29, respectively).

Conclusion

The advancement of protein in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with significant differences in the incidence of AKI. In contrast, the early advancement of protein in nutritional feeding within the first three days was associated with a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation.

Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Obesity: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients with obesity (PwO) have anthropometric characteristics that can be associated with different nutritional-metabolic requirements than other critically ill patients. However, recommendations regarding nutrition delivery in PwO are not clearly established among the different published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Our main aim was to evaluate the impact of energy and protein intake in critically ill PwO.

METHODS

A multicenter (n = 37) prospective observational study was performed. Adult patients requiring medical nutrition therapy (MNT) were included, and PwO (BMI ≥ 30 Kg·m-2) were analyzed. Demographic data, comorbidities, nutritional status, and the average caloric and protein delivery administered in the first 14 days, including complications and outcomes, were recorded in a database. Patients were classified and analyzed based on the adequacy of energy and protein intake according to CPG recommendations.

RESULTS

525 patients were included, of whom 150 (28.6%) had obesity. The energy delivery was considered inadequate (<11 Kcal/Kg/d) in 30.7% (n = 46) and adequate (≥11 Kcal/Kg/d) in 69.3% (n = 104) of cases. PwO who received adequate energy delivery had greater use of the parenteral route and longer mean hospital stays (28.6 ± 26.1 vs. 39.3 ± 28.1; p = 0.01) but lower ICU mortality (32.6% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.02). Protein delivery was inadequate (<0.8 g/Kg/d) in 63.3% (n = 95), insufficient (0.8-1.2 g/Kg/d) in 31.33% (n = 47), and adequate (≥1.2 g/Kg/d) in only 5.4% (n = 8) of patients. PwO with inadequate protein delivery-compared with insufficient delivery-had higher use of the parenteral route and lower mortality in the ICU (25.5% vs. 14.9%; p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that PwO who received adequate energy delivery (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.398; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.180-0.882; p = 0.023) had better survival, while patients with insufficient protein delivery (HR: 0.404; CI 95%: 0.171-0.955; p = 0.038) had better survival than those with inadequate delivery.

CONCLUSION

PwO can frequently receive inadequate energy and protein delivery from MNT during an ICU stay, which may impact the short-term mortality of these critically ill patients. It is emerging to develop strategies to optimize MNT delivery in these patients, which may improve their outcomes. NCT Registry: 03634943.

High vs low protein intake in chronic critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with persistent organ dysfunction after the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission are considered to have chronic critical illness (CCI). Acquired muscle weakness is a common feature of CCI that is accompanied by loss of muscle mass and electromyographic features of myopathy. Optimizing protein intake may help prevent acquired muscle weakness and/or promote muscle recovery, however, the optimal level of protein intake in CCI is uncertain and there is a lack of consensus in published nutritional guidelines. This systematic review focuses on the impact of high versus low protein intake as part of a nutritional strategy for patients with CCI.

METHODS

The terms "protein intake" and "critically ill" were systematically searched in PUBMED, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and WEB OF SCIENCE on 06/01/2023. We included studies that (1) enrolled critically ill adults (aged 18 years or over) who were in the ICU for more than 7 days and that compared (2) protein intake above and below 1.3 gr/kg administered by any route (enteral and/or parenteral), (3) had an intervention period that occurred primarily after the first 7 days of critical illness and (4) reported clinical outcomes including length of ICU and hospital stay, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), mortality, ICU acquired infections, muscle mass and physical function. Studies pertaining to elective surgery, those with intervention periods shorter than 7 days or occurring primarily within the first 7 days of critical illness, those measuring only laboratory parameters as outcomes, and safety and feasibility studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Four studies were included (N = 1730) in the meta-analysis and systematic review. Higher (>1.3 g/kg/d) versus lower protein intake was associated with a decrease in early mortality (defined as ICU or 28-day mortality) hazard ratio (HR) 0.42 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.70, P < 0.001), but had no impact on late mortality (defined as the latest mortality timepoint in each study): HR 0.93 (95 % CI 0.76-1.15, P = 0.51). There was no significant difference between intervention and control groups with respect to duration of IMV, duration of ICU or hospital stay, muscle mass, or the incidence of ICU-acquired infections. One study reported improvements in physical function at 3 and 6 months in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

After the first week of critical illness, increasing protein intake to >1.3 g/kg/d may improve early mortality but not late mortality or other clinical outcomes. The small number of relevant studies and the heterogeneity of outcomes assessed, weaken these conclusions. Further studies are warranted to discern whether higher protein intake is beneficial in chronic critical illness. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023403554; PROSPERO registration name: "The effect of higher than 1,3 g/kg of protein versus lower intake in chronic critically ill patients".

Hunger and the transition from parenteral nutrition in hospitalized adults: A descriptive cohort study

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) provides nutrition to patients who cannot use the digestive tract. Some patients experience delayed appetite recovery after PN, but the factors contributing to this remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether hospitalized patients receiving PN experience reduced hunger or appetite.

METHODS

A descriptive cohort study was conducted on adults who underwent PN between April 2022 and July 2023. Data on patient characteristics and nutritional support were collected from medical records. Hunger and satiety were assessed using a validated tool during three phases: clinical stability with calorie-protein targets on PN, transition to oral/enteral feeding, and PN withdrawal. The primary outcome was the absence of hunger assessed by the tool.

RESULTS

Of 231 screened patients, 102 were included. Among these, 62.7% reported hunger during PN. Lipid doses and energy reduction strategies did not affect hunger or satiety. Transition success to oral/enteral nutrition was 2.38 times higher in patients who experienced hunger compared to those who did not (95% CI: 1.59-3.54). Poisson regression identified higher age, inflammation, and metastatic cancer as independent factors associated with the absence of hunger.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that PN does not suppress hunger and that factors other than nutritional therapy (age, inflammation, and cancer) could explain the absence of appetite. Considering individual conditions and needs, these findings could guide decision-making strategies regarding the transition from PN to oral/enteral feeding.

Nutritional Support in the ICU

Critical illness is a complex condition that can have a devastating impact on health and quality of life. Nutritional support is a crucial component of critical care that aims to maintain or restore nutritional status and muscle function. A one-size-fits-all approach to the components of nutritional support has not proven beneficial. Recent randomized controlled trials challenge the conventional strategy and support the safety and potential benefits of below-usual calorie and protein intakes at the early, acute phase of critical illness. Further research is needed to define optimal nutritional support throughout the intensive care unit stay. Individualized nutritional strategies relying on risk assessment tools or biomarkers deserve further investigation in rigorously designed, large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. Importantly, although nutritional support is crucial, it might not be sufficient to enhance the recovery of critically ill patients. Thus, achieving the greatest efficacy may require individualized nutritional support combined with early, prolonged physical rehabilitation within a multimodal, holistic care program throughout the patient's recovery journey.

Association between protein intake and functional capacity in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) protein benchmarks are based on mortality and morbidity; whether these targets also support functional recovery is unknown. We assessed whether different protein doses influenced patients' functional capacity, measured by the Chelsea Physical Assessment score (CPAx).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study on ICU survivors with length of stay ≥7 days admitted between October 2014 and September 2020. Eligible patients were divided according to protein intake (g/kg/day): low (<0.8), medium (0.8-1.19), high (1.2-1.5), and very high (>1.5). Protein dose effect on CPAx was assessed at ICU discharge with analysis of covariance adjusting for age, illness severity, hospital length of stay before ICU admission, time to start nutrition support, and mechanical ventilation duration. We also investigated effect modification by energy intake and nutrition status.

RESULTS

Enrolled patients (n = 531) were similar for age, nutrition status, and illness severity across groups. CPAxs were nonlinearly associated with protein doses and similar among low, medium, and very high groups. The CPAx for the high group was statistically different (P = 0.014), indicating that the data of three groups could be pooled. Mean CPAx difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounding variables (3.9 ± 1.8, P = 0.029 in the four-group model, and 2.7 ± 0.9, P = 0.003 in the pooled two-group model). Energy intake was equivalent between groups and did not modify CPAx. The high group had superior CPAx in both well-nourished and malnourished patients, indicating nutrition status was not an effect modifier.

CONCLUSION

Protein dose 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day was associated with superior functional capacity at ICU discharge compared with other doses. Neither energy intake nor nutrition status modified functional capacity across groups; therefore, the results appear to be influenced by 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day.

The impact of protein delivery on short-term and long-term clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: Protocol for a multicenter, prospective, observational study (The ACTION study)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nutrition therapy is a vital part of the management of critically ill patients. Efforts have been made to optimize nutrition therapy in the ICU setting, and it is argued that protein might be the most important substrate to deliver during critical illness. However, the impact of protein delivery on patient-centered outcomes, including short-term and long-term outcomes, is controversial. Moreover, previous studies showed that compliance with the guidelines is poor in practice, and the amounts of protein intake vary significantly among different hospitals. The objective of this study is to describe the current practice of protein delivery for critically ill patients and to investigate the association between different protein delivery amounts and approaches during ICU admission and multiple patient-centered outcomes (short-term and long-term).

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 70 hospitals, aiming to recruit more than 1800 newly admitted critically ill patients who are expected to stay in ICU for at least 48 h. Data, including the baseline characteristics, illness severity scores, requirements of organ support therapy, and daily nutritional therapy, will be recorded until day 28 after enrollment unless discharge from the ICU or death occurs first. The key long-term clinical outcomes, like readmission post the index discharge and health-related quality of life, will be collected via telephone contact on Day 90 and Day 180 after recruitment. Quality of life will be assessed by the EuroQol five dimensions five-level questionnaire (EQ5D5L) visual analogue scale score. Apart from descriptive data, multivariate analyses adjusted for potential confounders will be applied to assess the association between protein intake during ICU stay and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes.

ETHICS AND TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Jinling Hospital (2021NZKY-027-01) and the participating sites. The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2200067016) before enrollment.

Effects of essential amino acid (EAA) and glutamine supplementation on skeletal muscle wasting in acute, subacute, and postacute conditions

Under optimal physiological conditions, muscle mass maintenance is ensured by dietary protein, which balances the amino acid loss during the post-absorption period and preserves the body's protein homeostasis. Conversely, in critical clinical conditions (acute, subacute or postacute), particularly those related to hypomobility or immobility, combined with malnutrition, and local/systemic inflammation, the loss of muscle mass and strength can be quantitatively significant. A decline of more than 1% in muscle mass and of more than 3% in muscle strength has been registered in subjects with aged 20-37 yr after just five days of bed rest, similarly to those observed during one year of age-related decline in individuals over the age of 50. Loss of muscle mass and strength can have a dramatic effect on subjects' functional capacities, on their systemic metabolic control and on the amino acid reserve function, all of which are fundamental for the maintenance of other organs' and tissues' cell processes. References available indicate that the average 1%-2% reduction per day of muscle mass in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) could represent an independent predictor of hospital mortality and physical disability in the five years following hospitalization. After just a few days or weeks of administration, supplementation with EAAs and glutamine has shown significant effects in maintaining muscle size and strength, which are typically negatively affected by some acute/subacute or postacute critical conditions (muscle recovery after surgery, oncology patients, ICU treatments), especially in the elderly or in those with pre-existing degenerative diseases. In this review, we focused on the theoretical bases and the most relevant clinical studies of EAA and glutamine supplementation as a single compound, with the aim of clarifying whether their combined use in a blend (EAAs-glutamine) could be potentially synergistic to prevent disease-related muscle wasting and its impact on the duration and quality of patients' clinical course.

Nutrition adequacy in the late period of the acute phase is associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality in critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The provision of nutrition support for critically ill patients in the early phase of intensive care unit (ICU) admission plays a vital role in their recovery. However, there is still debate regarding the impact of nutrition adequacy of critical illness phases. We aimed to investigate whether nutrition adequacy in the acute phase (early and late periods) is associated with 30-day mortality in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We prospectively collected nutrition and clinical data from critically ill patients receiving exclusive enteral nutrition (EN) within the first 10 days of ICU admission. EN was classified as adequate when ≥80% of the prescribed EN was administered. Directed acyclic graphs were constructed to identify the minimum set of adjustment variables required to control for confounding factors. The relationships between energy and protein intake and 30-day mortality were assessed using the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were evaluated (70 years old, 56.3% male, and 68.1% with medical admission). The 30-day mortality rate was 23%. After adjusting for confounders, in the late period (days 5-10), energy adequacy (hazard ratio [HR] =  0.960; 95% CI, 0.937-0.984) and protein adequacy (HR = 0.960; 95% CI, 0.937-0.982) were predictors of 30-day mortality. No associations were observed in the early period (days 1-4) of the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients, nutrition adequacy (≥80% EN) during days 5-10 in the ICU was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality.

Early protein delivery in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: post hoc analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial

Background

There is controversy over the optimal early protein delivery in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aims to evaluate whether the association between early protein delivery and 28-day mortality was impacted by the presence of AKI in critically ill patients.

Methods

This is a post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter cluster-randomised controlled trial enrolling newly admitted critically ill patients (n = 2772). Participants without chronic kidney disease and with complete data concerning baseline renal function were included in this study. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between early protein delivery, reflected by mean protein delivery from day 3-5 after enrollment, 28-day mortality and whether baseline AKI stages interacted with this association.

Results

Overall, 2552 patients were included, among whom 567 (22.2%) had AKI at enrollment (111 stage I, 87 stage II, 369 stage III). Mean early protein delivery was 0.60 ± 0.38 g/kg/day among the study patients. In the overall study cohort, each 0.1 g/kg/day increase in protein delivery was associated with a 5% reduction in 28-day mortality[hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001]. The association between early protein delivery and 28-day mortality significantly interacted with baseline AKI stages (adjusted interaction p = 0.028). Each 0.1 g/kg/day increase in early protein delivery was associated with a 4% reduction in 28-day mortality (HR = 0.96; 95%CI 0.92-0.99, p = 0.011) among patients without AKI and 9% (HR = 0.91; 95%CI 0.84-0.99, p = 0.021) among those with AKI stage III. However, such associations cannot be observed among patients with AKI stages I and II.

Conclusions

Increased early protein delivery (up to close to the guideline recommendation) was associated with reduced 28-day mortality in critically ill patients without AKI and with AKI stage III, but not in those with AKI stage I or II.

Impact of Protein Intake after Intensive Care Unit on Discharge Destination for Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Although nutritional therapy may be able to enable intensive care unit (ICU) survivors to return home instead of being discharged to a rehabilitation facility, post-ICU discharge nutritional therapy lacks investigation. This study evaluated the impact of nutritional therapy after ICU on discharge destination in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive adult patients who spent >72 h in the ICU from December 2020 to March 2023. The primary outcome was discharge destination. Energy and protein intake during the ICU stay and on days 7 and 14 after ICU discharge were evaluated. The target protein intake during the intensive treatment and general ward phases were 0.8 and 1.0 g/kg/day, respectively. Patients were categorized into home discharge (group A) and rehabilitation transfer (group B) groups. Factors affecting the discharge destination were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 183 patients included, 134 belonged to group A and 49 to group B. In group A, more patients reached the protein intake target than in group B. Logistic regression analysis identified achieving the protein intake target as an independent predictor of home discharge.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are required to confirm the relationship between nutritional therapy during general ward and patient outcomes.

Advances in nutritional metabolic therapy to impede the progression of critical illness

With the advancement of medical care and the continuous improvement of organ support technologies, some critically ill patients survive the acute phase of their illness but still experience persistent organ dysfunction, necessitating long-term reliance on intensive care and organ support, known as chronic critical illness. Chronic critical illness is characterized by prolonged hospital stays, high mortality rates, and significant resource consumption. Patients with chronic critical illness often suffer from malnutrition, compromised immune function, and poor baseline health, which, combined with factors like shock or trauma, can lead to intestinal mucosal damage. Therefore, effective nutritional intervention for patients with chronic critical illness remains a key research focus. Nutritional therapy has emerged as one of the essential components of the overall treatment strategy for chronic critical illness. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the latest research progress in nutritional support therapy for patients with chronic critical illness.

A review of perioperative immune-modulating and metabolic-modulating nutrition strategies for bowel resection surgery

Focused perioperative nutrition strategies have proven benefits on the outcomes for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. In this brief article, we will review these strategies and the evidence to support them with a focus on gastrointestinal anastomotic healing. We will elaborate the risks and benefits of enteral feeds, immune- and metabolic-modulating formulas, prebiotics and probiotics, and prehabilitation in preparation for surgery. Additionally, we will discuss the role of fish oils (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) in the surgical patient and new data on specialized proresolving mediators in inflammation resolution. Finally, this article will consider the harmful impact surgical trauma has on the microbiome and the potential for perioperative dietary modulation to attenuate these negative effects.

Impact of early high protein intake in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Conflicting findings regarding the impact of High protein intake during the early phase in critically ill patients have been reported. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of higher early protein intake on the prognosis of critically ill patients.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial involved 173 critically ill patients who stayed in the Intensive Care Unit/Emergency ICU (ICU/EICU) for at least 7 days. The Low group (n = 87) and High group (n = 86) received protein supplementation of 0.8 g/kg.d and 1.5 g/kg.d, respectively, within 1-3 days of enteral nutrition (EN) initiation, with both groups transitioning to 1.5 g/kg.d on the 4th day. The serum prealbumin (PA), blood urea nitrogen/creatinine, and rectus femoris muscle thickness and cross-sectional area of all patients was measured on the 1th, 3rd, 5th, 7th day, and the day of ICU/EICU discharge.

RESULTS

Patients in both Low and High groups showed no significant differences in age, APACHE II scores, or other demographic and baseline characteristics. There were also no significant differences in the primary outcome (28-day mortality rate) and secondary outcomes (incidence rate of refeeding syndrome and EN tolerance score) between the two groups. However, the Low group exhibited a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate (HR = 2.462, 95% CI: 1.021-5.936, P = 0.045) compared to High group, as determined by Cox proportional hazards models incorporating the time factor. The High group exhibited significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay compared to the Low group. Serum PA levels were higher, and rectus femoris muscle atrophy rates were lower in the High group. Furthermore, for septic patients, high protein intake significantly reduced the 28-day mortality rate despite a small sample size (n = 34).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that increasing early protein intake to 1.5 g/kg.d may be safe and help improve the nutritional status and prognosis of critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000039997, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ).

Nutritional support for the trauma and emergency general surgery patient: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Decades of research have provided insight into the benefits of nutritional optimization in the elective surgical patient. Patients who are nutritionally prepared for surgery enjoy reduced length of hospital and intensive care unit stays and suffer fewer complications. In the trauma and emergency general surgery patient populations, we are not afforded the preoperative period of optimization and patients often suffer longer lengths of hospital stay, discharge to nonhome destinations, and higher infectious and mortality rates. Nonetheless, ongoing research in this vulnerable and time critical diagnosis population has revealed significant outcomes benefits with the meticulous nutritional support of these patients. However, it is important to note that optimal nutritional support in this challenging patient population is not simply a matter of "feeding more and feeding earlier." In this review, we will address assessing nutritional needs, the provision of optimal nutrition, the timing and route of nutrition, and monitoring outcomes and discuss the management of nutrition in the complex trauma and emergency general surgery patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Literature Synthesis and Expert Opinion; Level V.

Combining proteins with n-3 PUFAs (EPA + DHA) and their inflammation pro-resolution mediators for preservation of skeletal muscle mass

The optimal feeding strategy for critically ill patients is still debated, but feeding must be adapted to individual patient needs. Critically ill patients are at risk of muscle catabolism, leading to loss of muscle mass and its consequent clinical impacts. Timing of introduction of feeding and protein targets have been explored in recent trials. These suggest that "moderate" protein provision (maximum 1.2 g/kg/day) is best during the initial stages of illness. Unresolved inflammation may be a key factor in driving muscle catabolism. The omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are substrates for synthesis of mediators termed specialized pro-resolving mediators or SPMs that actively resolve inflammation. There is evidence from other settings that high-dose oral EPA + DHA increases muscle protein synthesis, decreases muscle protein breakdown, and maintains muscle mass. SPMs may be responsible for some of these effects, especially upon muscle protein breakdown. Given these findings, provision of EPA and DHA as part of medical nutritional therapy in critically ill patients at risk of loss of muscle mass seems to be a strategy to prevent the persistence of inflammation and the related anabolic resistance and muscle loss.

High protein intake and nitrogen balance in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A descriptive cohort study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study sought to describe the ability of high protein regimens to achieve nitrogen equilibrium in patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with a documented nitrogen balance study (NB) on VV ECMO between February 2018 and December 2021 were included. Studies with incomplete 24-h urine collections or changes in blood urea nitrogen ≥10 mg/dl were excluded. Data were summarized, correlation between first NB and potentially contributing variables was assessed with Kendall tau. Subanalysis described findings after stratifying for weight class (obese vs nonobese) and duration of VV ECMO at the time of NB.

RESULTS

A total of 68 NBs in 30 patients were included; 47% of the cohort had obesity. The number of NBs per patient was 2.2 ± 1.1, which were completed on a median of 31.5 (interquartile range: 16, 53.8) days receiving ECMO. Nitrogen equilibrium or positive balance was achieved in 72% of studies despite elevated nitrogen excretion. Patients received 87.9 ± 16.8% of prescribed protein on NB days for average intakes of 2.4 ± 0.4 g/kg of actual weight per day and 2.4 ± 0.5 g/kg of ideal weight per day in patients without and with obesity. Median NB in patients without obesity was -1.46 (-8.96, 2.98) g/day and -0.21 (-10.58, 4.04) g/day in patients with obesity. A difference in median NB after stratification for timing was observed (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Nitrogen equilibrium can be achieved with high protein intake in adults receiving VV ECMO. NB monitoring is one tool to individualize protein prescriptions throughout the course of VV ECMO.

Enteral feeding strategies in patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: From limited to progressive to open feeding

Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) is very common in critically ill patients, and its severity is positively correlated with mortality. Critically ill patients with digestive and absorption dysfunction caused by AGI face higher nutritional risks, making nutritional support particularly important. Early enteral nutrition (EN) support is extremely important because it can promote the recovery of intestinal function, protect the intestinal mucosal barrier, reduce microbiota translocation, reduce postoperative complications, shorten hospital stay, and improve clinical prognosis. In recent years, many nutritional guidelines have been proposed for critically ill patients; however, there are few recommendations for the implementation of EN in patients with AGI, and their quality of evidence is low. The use of EN feeding strategies in critically ill patients with AGI remains controversial. The aim of this review was to elaborate on how EN feeding strategies should transition from limited to progressive to open feeding and explain the time window for this transition.

Association between first-week propofol administration and long-term outcomes of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIM

Propofol is commonly used in ICUs, but its long-term effects have not been thoroughly studied. In vitro studies suggest it may harm mitochondrial function, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between substantial propofol sedation and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre cohort study of critically ill, mechanically ventilated (≥7 days) adults to compare patients who received a substantial dose of propofol (cumulative >500 mg) during the first week of ICU admission with those who did not. The primary outcome was the association between substantial propofol administration and 6-month mortality, adjusted for relevant covariates. Subanalyses were performed for administration in the early (day 1-3) and late (day 4-7) acute phases of critical illness due to the metabolic changes in this period. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy need and duration, length of ICU and hospital stay (LOS), discharge destinations, ICU, hospital, and 3-month mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 839 patients were enrolled, with 73.7 % receiving substantial propofol administration (substantial propofol dose group). Six-month all-cause mortality was 32.4 %. After adjusting for relevant variables, we found no statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality between both groups. There were also no significant differences in secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that substantial propofol administration during the first week of ICU stay in the least sick critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients is safe, with no significant associations found with 6-month mortality, ICU or hospital LOS, differences in discharge destinations or need for tracheostomy.

Prognosis for major abdominal surgeries based on intraoperative low-dose nutrition: A metabolic perspective

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal nutrition intake during surgery is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of low-dose nutrition during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

In the glucose and amino acids (GA) group, 20 patients were infused with glucose (75 g/L) and amino acids (30 g/L) at 60 mL/h and bicarbonate Ringer's solution. However, 20 patients in the control (C) group were infused with bicarbonate Ringer's solution without GA. The length of hospital stay was determined, and measurements were taken before (TI) and after (T2) the surgery under general anesthesia.

RESULTS

The lengths of hospital stay were comparable between the GA (13 days) and C (16 days) groups. Ketone body levels were 294 (C group) and 33 (GA group) μmol/L at T2. Nitrogen balance was 0.32 g (GA group) and -1.60 g (C group) at T2.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the lengths of hospital stay were comparable, ketone body levels, and nitrogen balance were significantly different (P < 0.01) between the two groups after surgery.

The effect of protein provision and exercise therapy on patient-reported and clinical outcomes in intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors deal with long-term health problems, which negatively affect their quality of life (QoL). Nutritional and exercise intervention could prevent the decline of muscle mass and physical functioning which occurs during critical illness. Despite the growing amount of research, robust evidence is lacking.

METHODS

For this systematic review, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The effect of protein provision (PP) or combined protein and exercise therapy (CPE) during or after ICU admission on QoL, physical functioning, muscle health, protein/energy intake and mortality was assessed compared to standard care.

RESULTS

Four thousand nine hundred and fifty-seven records were identified. After screening, data were extracted for 15 articles (9 randomised controlled trials and 6 non-randomised studies). Two studies reported improvements in muscle mass, of which one found higher independency in activities of daily living. No significant effect was found on QoL. Overall, protein targets were seldom met and often below recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for the effect of PP or CPE on patient-reported outcomes in ICU survivors is limited due to study heterogeneity and lack of high-quality studies. Future research and clinical practice should focus on adequate protein delivery with exercise interventions to improve long-term outcomes.

ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: Clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit

Following the new ESPEN Standard Operating Procedures, the previous 2019 guideline to provide best medical nutritional therapy to critically ill patients has been shortened and partially revised. Following this update, we propose this publication as a practical guideline based on the published scientific guideline, but shortened and illustrated by flow charts. The main goal of this practical guideline is to increase understanding and allow the practitioner to implement the Nutrition in the ICU guidelines. All the items discussed in the previous guidelines are included as well as special conditions.

Replacing protein via enteral nutrition in a stepwise approach in critically ill patients: the REPLENISH randomized clinical trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Protein intake is recommended in critically ill patients to mitigate the negative effects of critical illness-induced catabolism and muscle wasting. However, the optimal dose of enteral protein remains unknown. We hypothesize that supplemental enteral protein (1.2 g/kg/day) added to standard enteral nutrition formula to achieve high amount of enteral protein (range 2-2.4 g/kg/day) given from ICU day 5 until ICU discharge or ICU day 90 as compared to no supplemental enteral protein to achieve moderate amount enteral protein (0.8-1.2 g/kg/day) would reduce all-cause 90-day mortality in adult critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

The REPLENISH (Replacing Protein Via Enteral Nutrition in a Stepwise Approach in Critically Ill Patients) trial is an open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomized to the supplemental protein group or the control group. Patients in both groups will receive the primary enteral formula as per the treating team, which includes a maximum protein 1.2 g/kg/day. The supplemental protein group will receive, in addition, supplemental protein at 1.2 g/kg/day starting the fifth ICU day. The control group will receive the primary formula without supplemental protein. The primary outcome is 90-day all-cause mortality. Other outcomes include functional and quality of life assessments at 90 days. The trial will enroll 2502 patients.

DISCUSSION

The study has been initiated in September 2021. Interim analysis is planned at one third and two thirds of the target sample size. The study is expected to be completed by the end of 2025.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04475666 . Registered on July 17, 2020.

Personalized nutrition therapy in critical care: 10 expert recommendations

Personalization of ICU nutrition is essential to future of critical care. Recommendations from American/European guidelines and practice suggestions incorporating recent literature are presented. Low-dose enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) can be started within 48 h of admission. While EN is preferred route of delivery, new data highlight PN can be given safely without increased risk; thus, when early EN is not feasible, provision of isocaloric PN is effective and results in similar outcomes. Indirect calorimetry (IC) measurement of energy expenditure (EE) is recommended by both European/American guidelines after stabilization post-ICU admission. Below-measured EE (~ 70%) targets should be used during early phase and increased to match EE later in stay. Low-dose protein delivery can be used early (~ D1-2) (< 0.8 g/kg/d) and progressed to ≥ 1.2 g/kg/d as patients stabilize, with consideration of avoiding higher protein in unstable patients and in acute kidney injury not on CRRT. Intermittent-feeding schedules hold promise for further research. Clinicians must be aware of delivered energy/protein and what percentage of targets delivered nutrition represents. Computerized nutrition monitoring systems/platforms have become widely available. In patients at risk of micronutrient/vitamin losses (i.e., CRRT), evaluation of micronutrient levels should be considered post-ICU days 5-7 with repletion of deficiencies where indicated. In future, we hope use of muscle monitors such as ultrasound, CT scan, and/or BIA will be utilized to assess nutrition risk and monitor response to nutrition. Use of specialized anabolic nutrients such as HMB, creatine, and leucine to improve strength/muscle mass is promising in other populations and deserves future study. In post-ICU setting, continued use of IC measurement and other muscle measures should be considered to guide nutrition. Research on using rehabilitation interventions such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to guide post-ICU exercise/rehabilitation prescription and using anabolic agents such as testosterone/oxandrolone to promote post-ICU recovery is needed.

The impact of high versus standard enteral protein provision on functional recovery following intensive care admission (PRECISE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled, quadruple blinded, multicenter, parallel group trial in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients are subject to severe skeletal muscle wasting during intensive care unit (ICU) stay, resulting in impaired short- and long-term functional outcomes and health-related quality of life. Increased protein provision may improve functional outcomes in ICU patients by attenuating skeletal muscle breakdown. Supporting evidence is limited however and results in great variety in recommended protein targets.

METHODS

The PRECISe trial is an investigator-initiated, bi-national, multi-center, quadruple-blinded randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design. In 935 patients, we will compare provision of isocaloric enteral nutrition with either a standard or high protein content, providing 1.3 or 2.0 g of protein/kg/day, respectively, when fed on target. All unplanned ICU admissions with initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 h of admission and an expected stay on ventilator support of at least 3 days are eligible. The study is designed to assess the effect of the intervention on functional recovery at 1, 3, and 6 months following ICU admission, including health-related quality of life, measures of muscle strength, physical function, and mental health. The primary endpoint of the trial is health-related quality of life as measured by the Euro-QoL-5D-5-level questionnaire Health Utility Score. Overall between-group differences will be assessed over the three time points using linear mixed-effects models.

DISCUSSION

The PRECISe trial will evaluate the effect of protein on functional recovery including both patient-centered and muscle-related outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04633421 . Registered on November 18, 2020. First patient in (FPI) on November 19, 2020. Expected last patient last visit (LPLV) in October 2023.

Metabolic Support in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Narrative Review

Nutritional support for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients shares metabolic notions common to other critically ill conditions. Nevertheless, it generates specific concern regarding the primary limitation of oxygen supply and the complications of carbon dioxide elimination, as well as the significant metabolic alterations due to the body's response to illness. In the present narrative review, after briefly summarizing the pathophysiology of critical illness stress response and patients' metabolic requirements, we focus on describing the characteristics of metabolic and artificial nutrition in patients with acute respiratory failure. In patients with ARDS, several aspects of metabolism assume special importance. The physiological effects of substrate metabolism are described for this setting, particularly regarding energy consumption, diet-induced thermogenesis, and the price of their clearance, transformation, and storage. Moreover, we review the possible direct effects of macronutrients on lung tissue viability during ARDS. Finally, we summarize the noteworthy characteristics of metabolic control in critically ill patients with ARDS and offer a suggestion as to the ideal methods of metabolic support for this problem.

Association Between Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness and Early Nutrition and Rehabilitation Intensity in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Muscle weakness in the intensive care unit (ICU), referred to as ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW), is a common complication observed in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. This study aimed to investigate whether rehabilitation intensity and nutrition during ICU admission are associated with the incidence of ICUAW.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU between April 2019 and March 2020 and who received mechanical ventilation for >48 h were eligible. The included patients were divided into two groups: the ICUAW group and the non-ICUAW group. ICUAW was designated by a Medical Research Council score of less than 48 during discharge from the ICU. Patient characteristics, time to achieve ICU mobility scale (IMS) 1 and IMS 3, calorie and protein deliveries, and blood creatinine and creatine kinase levels were evaluated as study data. In this study, the target dose for the first week after admission to the ICU at each hospital was set at 60-70% of the energy requirement calculated by the Harris-Benedict formula. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the odds ratios (OR) for each factor and to explain the risk factors for the occurrence of ICUAW at ICU discharge.

RESULTS

During the study period, 206 patients were enrolled; 62 of the 143 included patients (43%) had ICUAW. The results of multivariate regression analysis showed that low time to IMS 3 achievement (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.42, p=0.033), and high mean calorie (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.93, p<0.001) and protein deliveries (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.56, p<0.001) were independently associated with the occurrence of ICUAW.

CONCLUSIONS

Increase in rehabilitation intensity and mean calorie and protein deliveries were associated with a decrease in the occurrence of ICUAW at ICU discharge. Further research is required to validate our results. Our observations, increasing the intensity of physical rehabilitation and the average calorie and protein delivery levels during ICU stay, appear to be the preferred strategies for achieving non-ICUAW.

Protein supplementation in critical illness: why, when and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In critically ill patients, optimal protein provision remains a challenge given the wide range in recommended protein delivery in international guidelines and the lack of robust, high quality evidence. As patients are confronted with poor functional outcomes after admission, often attributed to muscle wasting and persisting for multiple years, there is a pressing need for optimal nutritional strategies in the ICU, particularly including protein. This review will discuss the recent literature with regard to purpose, timing and mode of protein delivery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on the effect of dose and timing of protein on clinical and functional outcomes are largely observational in nature and the protein delivery considered as "high" still often only nears the lower end of current recommendations. The majority of trials observed no effect of protein supplementation on mortality, muscle strength or function, though some report attenuation of muscle volume loss, especially when combined with muscle activation. There is no strong evidence that ICU patients should receive supplementation with any specific amino acids.

SUMMARY

Though adequate protein provision is likely important, it is difficult to come to a uniform conclusion regarding dosing and timing due to conflicting results in mostly observational studies as well as different cut-off values for high, moderate and low protein intake. This topic is currently subject to large clinical trials.

Effect of protein underdosing on the prognosis of patients with severe acute heart failure in the early acute phase: A single-institutional retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The appropriate protein dose during the early acute phase of severe acute heart failure (AHF) remains unknown. We hypothesized that protein underdosing during this period may lead to a poor prognosis. Thus, we investigated the relationship between protein sufficiency rate and prognosis during the early acute phase in patients with severe AHF.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study investigated patients with AHF requiring invasive mechanical ventilation who were admitted in the intensive care and cardiac care units between January 2015 and August 2021. These patients were ranked according to the tertile of protein sufficiency rate on intubation day 2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether a low protein sufficiency rate on intubation day 2 was an independent factor for in-hospital mortality. Patients were weighted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to determine the differences in baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included in the study and divided into low-protein (n = 40) and non-low-protein (n = 78) groups with protein sufficiency rates of ≤10% and >10%, respectively.In the multivariate analysis of in-hospital mortality, low protein sufficiency on day 2 was identified as an independent factor (odds ratio [OR] = 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-7.27, P = 0.039). After adjusting for baseline characteristics using the IPTW method, multiple logistic regression analysis of in-hospital mortality revealed low protein sufficiency on day 2 as an independent factor (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.18-9.32, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Protein underdosing in the early acute phase of severe AHF may be associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Association between early nutrition support and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients: the FRANS prospective nutrition cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines suggest the introduction of early nutrition support within the first 48 h of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients who cannot eat. In that context, we aimed to describe nutrition practices in the ICU and study the association between the introduction of early nutrition support (< 48 h) in the ICU and patient mortality at day 28 (D28) using data from a multicentre prospective cohort.

METHODS

The 'French-Speaking ICU Nutritional Survey' (FRANS) study was conducted in 26 ICUs in France and Belgium over 3 months in 2015. Adult patients with a predicted ICU length of stay > 3 days were consecutively included and followed for 10 days. Their mortality was assessed at D28. We investigated the association between early nutrition (< 48 h) and mortality at D28 using univariate and multivariate propensity-score-weighted logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1206 patients were included. Early nutrition support was administered to 718 patients (59.5%), with 504 patients receiving enteral nutrition and 214 parenteral nutrition. Early nutrition was more frequently prescribed in the presence of multiple organ failure and less frequently in overweight and obese patients. Early nutrition was significantly associated with D28 mortality in the univariate analysis (crude odds ratio (OR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.34) and propensity-weighted multivariate analysis (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10). In subgroup analyses, this association was stronger in patients ≤ 65 years and with SOFA scores ≤ 8. Compared with no early nutrition, a significant association was found of D28 mortality with early enteral (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) but not early parenteral nutrition (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective cohort study, early nutrition support in the ICU was significantly associated with increased mortality at D28, particularly in younger patients with less severe disease. Compared to no early nutrition, only early enteral nutrition appeared to be associated with increased mortality. Such findings are in contrast with current guidelines on the provision of early nutrition support in the ICU and may challenge our current practices, particularly concerning patients at low nutrition risk. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02599948. Retrospectively registered on November 5th 2015.

Safety of increasing protein delivery with an enteral nutrition formula containing very high protein (VHP) and lower carbohydrate concentrations compared to conventional standard (SF) and high protein (HP) formulas

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies demonstrate that caloric restriction in the first seven days in the ICU is safe. The amount of protein that should be delivered, however, is still unclear with clinical trials suggesting mixed results. Despite some capacity to customize the delivery of protein using supplemental modules, protein delivered is best determined by the concentration of protein contained in enteral formula (EF) ordered. This fact provides an opportunity to explore the potential clinical effects of protein delivery and lower carbohydrate intake on clinical outcomes compared with conventional enteral formulas.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes according to the amount of protein delivered in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units at Geisinger Health System.

RESULTS

2000 encounters (1899 patients) in patients on enteral nutrition were divided into three groups receiving EF with either ≤20% protein (standard formula - SF), 21-25% protein (high protein - HP) or > 25% protein (VHP). Protein intake increased up to day 7 (p < 0.0001). Patients on VHP received more protein than other groups (p < 0.0001). Multivariable regression analysis showed no evidence of harm. In fact, we observed increased mortality with SF and HP formulas at 30-days post-discharge when compared to patients on VHP even when the effects of other variables (including age, BMI, sex, primary diagnosis, diabetes, history of dialysis, ICU days kept NPO) were taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing protein intake while reducing carbohydrate intake appears to be safe. Further research aimed at defining a causative effect of increasing protein delivery while reducing carbohydrate load on outcomes is warranted.

The Impact of Higher Protein Intake in Patients with Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) is associated with poor outcomes and a high economic cost. The association between protein intake and PMV has rarely been investigated in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of protein intake on weaning from mechanical ventilation. Patients with the PMV (mechanical ventilation ≥6 h/day for ≥21 days) at our hospital between December 2020 and April 2022 were included in this study. Demographic data, nutrition records, laboratory data, weaning conditions, and survival data were retrieved from the patient’s electronic medical records. A total of 172 patients were eligible for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: weaning success (n = 109) and weaning failure (n = 63). Patients with daily protein intake greater than 1.2 g/kg/day had significant shorter median days of ventilator use than those with less daily protein intake (36.5 vs. 114 days, respectively, p < 0.0001). Daily protein intake ≥1.065 g/kg/day (odds ratio: 4.97, p = 0.033), daily protein intake ≥1.2 g/kg/day (odds ratio: 89.07, p = 0.001), improvement of serum albumin (odds ratio: 3.68, p = 0.027), and BMI (odds ratio: 1.235, p = 0.014) were independent predictor for successful weaning. The serum creatinine level in the 4th week remained similar in patients with daily protein intake either >1.065 g/kg/day or >1.2 g/kg/day (p = 0.5219 and p = 0.7796, respectively). Higher protein intake may have benefits in weaning in patients with PMV and had no negative impact on renal function.

Administration of enteral nutrition and gastrointestinal complications in Covid-19 critical patients in prone position

Background

The prone position (PP) used in the treatment of critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, may be a barrier to enteral nutrition (EN). This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and complications of EN in the PP, as well as clinical outcomes.

Methods

Prospective cohort study with patients in EN and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on mechanical ventilation (MV), which whom needed or not PP. Gastrointestinal intolerances (GII) related to PP were evaluated, and correlated with possible confounding factors. EN, days on MV, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and mortality were analyzed. The data were evaluated daily and compared prone group (PG=57) and supine group (SG=69).

Results

The PP was associated with GII (P=0.000) and presented in 32 patients (26,44%) with no difference among groups. Association between epinephrine (P=0.003), vasopressin (P=0.018), and GII was observed. There was no difference between the total volume of enteral nutrition (TVEN) infused in the groups. However, the mean EN infused for the days when the patient was on PP was (70.0% ± 31.5) and for the days in supine position was (74.8% ± 27.3), P= 0.006. The PG had a longer time on MV (P=0.005) and ICU (P=0.003) and PP was associated with VAP (P=<0.001). The infused TVEN showed no association with VAP (P=0.09).

Conclusion

PP was a determining factor in GII and proved to be a risk factor for VAP, but the EN protocol seems to have ensured an adequate EN supply in PP and be a safe alternative.

When is enteral nutrition indicated?

Enteral nutrition (EN) is a vital component of nutrition around the world. EN allows for delivery of nutrients to those who cannot maintain adequate nutrition by oral intake alone. Common questions regarding EN are when to initiate and in what scenarios it is safe. The answers to these questions are often complex and require an evidence-based approach. The Board of Directors of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) established an Enteral Nutrition Committtee to address the important questions surrounding the indications for EN. Consensus recommendations were established based on eight extremely clinically relevant questions regarding EN indications as deemed by the Enteral Nutrition Committee. These consensus recommendations may act as a guide for clinicians and stakeholders on difficult questions pertaining to indications for EN. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.

A Narrative Review of Nutrition Therapy in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe cardiorespiratory failure has seen significant growth in the last decade. Despite this, there is paucity of data surrounding the optimum nutritional management for ECMO patients. This review aimed to describe current nutrition practices in patients receiving ECMO, critically appraise available studies and identify areas for future research. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL Plus to identify all randomized trials and observational studies published between July 2000 and July 2020 investigating nutrition practices in critically ill adults receiving ECMO. The primary outcomes were nutritional adequacy, gastrointestinal complications, and physical function. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and duration on ECMO support. From a total of 31 studies identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Nine observational studies were reviewed following eligibility assessment. Early enteral nutrition was deemed safe and feasible for ECMO patients; however, meeting nutritional targets was challenging. Utilizing alternative nutrition routes is an option, although risks and benefits should be taken into consideration. Data on gastrointestinal complications and other clinical outcomes were inconsistent, and no data were identified investigating the effects of nutrition on the physical and functional recovery of ECMO patients. Nutrition therapy in ECMO patients should be provided in line with current guidelines for nutrition in critical illness until further data are available. Further prospective, randomized studies investigating optimum nutrition practices and effects on clinical and functional outcomes are urgently required.

Nutritional support protocol for patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND & AIMS

COVID-19 is a hypercatabolic disease with possible pulmonary and gastrointestinal symptoms, and consequent deterioration of the nutritional status and the worst clinical prognosis. This study presents a protocol to guide the nutritional care of adult and elderly people non-critically and critically ill with COVID-19.

METHODS

A critical review of the literature was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scielo, Bireme, and Science Direct, in search of articles and guidelines that presented assessment criteria and nutritional conduct for COVID-19 and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), as well as guidelines for managing the symptoms presented by patients.

RESULTS

The results are recommendations based on the literature and the professional experience of nutritionists who provide nutritional assistance to individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Brazil. We present tools and suggestions for assessing the nutritional status, calculating nutritional needs, initiating nutritional therapy and monitoring tolerance to it, nutritional monitoring during hospitalization, and guidelines for hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COVID-19 are at nutritional risk. A complete nutritional assessment (anthropometric, dietary, and laboratory assessment) enables the establishment of an individualized nutritional approach in order to contribute to better clinical and nutritional prognoses.

Medical nutrition therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill adults: a European multinational, prospective observational cohort study (EuroPN)

BACKGROUND

Medical nutrition therapy may be associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay. We wanted to assess nutrition practices in European intensive care units (ICU) and their importance for clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective multinational cohort study in patients staying in ICU ≥ 5 days with outcome recorded until day 90. Macronutrient intake from enteral and parenteral nutrition and non-nutritional sources during the first 15 days after ICU admission was compared with targets recommended by ESPEN guidelines. We modeled associations between three categories of daily calorie and protein intake (low: < 10 kcal/kg, < 0.8 g/kg; moderate: 10-20 kcal/kg, 0.8-1.2 g/kg, high: > 20 kcal/kg; > 1.2 g/kg) and the time-varying hazard rates of 90-day mortality or successful weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

RESULTS

A total of 1172 patients with median [Q1;Q3] APACHE II score of 18.5 [13.0;26.0] were included, and 24% died within 90 days. Median length of ICU stay was 10.0 [7.0;16.0] days, and 74% of patients could be weaned from invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients reached on average 83% [59;107] and 65% [41;91] of ESPEN calorie and protein recommended targets, respectively. Whereas specific reasons for ICU admission (especially respiratory diseases requiring IMV) were associated with higher intakes (estimate 2.43 [95% CI: 1.60;3.25] for calorie intake, 0.14 [0.09;0.20] for protein intake), a lack of nutrition on the preceding day was associated with lower calorie and protein intakes (- 2.74 [- 3.28; - 2.21] and - 0.12 [- 0.15; - 0.09], respectively). Compared to a lower intake, a daily moderate intake was associated with higher probability of successful weaning (for calories: maximum HR 4.59 [95% CI: 1.5;14.09] on day 12; for protein: maximum HR 2.60 [1.09;6.23] on day 12), and with a lower hazard of death (for calories only: minimum HR 0.15, [0.05;0.39] on day 19). There was no evidence that a high calorie or protein intake was associated with further outcome improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Calorie intake was mainly provided according to the targets recommended by the active ESPEN guideline, but protein intake was lower. In patients staying in ICU ≥ 5 days, early moderate daily calorie and protein intakes were associated with improved clinical outcomes. Trial registration NCT04143503 , registered on October 25, 2019.