1
|
Burney IA, Aal Hamad AH, Hashmi SFA, Ahmad N, Pervez N. Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5570. [PMID: 38067273 PMCID: PMC10705608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikram A. Burney
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
- Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine & Drug Research, International Center of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Karachi University, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
| | | | - Syed F. A. Hashmi
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| | - Nisar Ahmad
- Department of Economics and Finance, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman;
| | - Nadeem Pervez
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee SH. Selecting the Appropriate Radiation Therapy Technique for Extensive Brain Metastases from Tens to Hundreds: Should the Latest Technique Always Be the Best Option? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1815. [PMID: 37893533 PMCID: PMC10608536 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are one of the most common metastatic lesions in adult cancer patients and the most common intracranial neoplasms in adult patients. Especially for multiple BMs, historically, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been performed as the mainstay of therapy, which improves neurological symptoms and median survival. However, WBRT could negatively impact the patient's quality of life due to late complications. Owing to these complications, attempts have been made to use the latest radiotherapy (LRT) such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat BMs. However, for the extensive BMs (ranging from tens to hundreds), there are currently no prospective studies comparing WBRT with LRT such as IMRT or SRS. For extensive brain metastases, LRT cannot be the best option. Instead, upfront WBRT should be considered given its advantages and disadvantages, rather than LRT. We hope that faster and more reliable LRT for extensive BMs will be applicable for clinical practice without any clinical concerns in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seok Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Y, Huang K, Lin Y, Zhang J, Song C. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15090-15100. [PMID: 37255389 PMCID: PMC10417165 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show activity against breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype. This meta-analysis aimed to objectively explore the efficacy and safety of TKIs. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for relevant clinical trials. We conducted a pairwise meta-analysis, pooled analysis, and estimated summary survival curves to compare survival outcomes following TKIs therapy for BCBM patients using Stata version 16.0 or R x64 4.0.5. RESULTS Thirteen clinical trials involving 987 HER2-positive BCBM patients were analyzed. A trend of longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the TKI-containing arm compared to the non-TKI-containing arm (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-1.15, p = 0.132), although the difference is not statistically significant. Summary survival curves reported the summary median PFS and overall survival were 7.9 months and 12.3 months. Subgroup analysis revealed that TKIs combined with capecitabine (TKI + Cap) regimens resulted in improved survival outcomes. Tucatinib may be more effective in BCBM patients. The main grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (22%, 95% CI: 14%-32%), neutropenia (11%, 95% CI: 5%-18%), hepatic toxicity (7%, 95% CI: 1%-16%), and sensory neuropathy (6%, 95% CI: 2%-12%). CONCLUSION TKIs therapy improved the survival outcomes of HER2-positive BCBM patients, especially when combined with capecitabine and tolerable AEs. We also identified the clinical value of tucatinib, which appears to be the most favorable TKI drug for BCBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushuai Yu
- Department of Breast SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
| | - Kaiyan Huang
- Department of Breast SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
| | - Yuxiang Lin
- Department of Breast SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of General SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Breast SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of General SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
| | - Chuangui Song
- Department of Breast SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
- Department of General SurgeryFujian Medical University Union HospitalFuzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sağlam Y. A novel weight optimized dynamic conformal arcs with TrueBeam™ Linac for very small tumors (≤1 cc) with single isocenter of multiple brain metastases (2≤, ≥4) in stereotactic radiosurgery: A comparison with volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2023; 19:1297-1304. [PMID: 37787298 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1829_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We evaluated whether improved increase delivery efficiency of weight optimized dynamic conformal arc (WO-DCA) therapy in comparison to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with single isocenter for SRS treatment of very small volume and multiple brain metastases (BMs). Materials and Methods 20 patients having a less than 1 cc volume and 2≤, ≥4 of multiple BMs, redesigned for 20 Gy in 1 fraction using WO-DCA and VMAT techniques with double full coplanar and three partial noncoplanar arcs. Plan qualities were compared using tumor coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V4Gy, V10Gy, and V12Gy volumes of brain, monitor units (MUs), and percent of quality assurance pass rate (QA%). Results Both techniques satisfied clinical requirements in coverage and CI. VMAT had a significantly higher MU and mean GI than WO-DCA (for MUs; 2330 vs. 1991; P < 0.001, and for GI; 4.72 vs. 3.39; P < 0.001). WO-DCA was found significantly lower V4Gy (171.11 vs. 232.80 cm3, P < 0.001), V10Gy (25.82 vs. 29.71 cm3, P < 0.05), and V12Gy (14.35 vs. 17.28 cm3, P < 0.05) volumes than VMAT. WO-DCA was associated with markedly increase QA pass rates for all plans (97.65% vs. 92.64%, P < 0.001). Conclusions WO-DCA may be the first choice compared to the VMAT in reducing the dose in the brain and minimizing small-field dosimetric errors for very small SRS treatment of brain metastases in the range of ≤ 1 cc and 2≤, ≥4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yücel Sağlam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Topkapi, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herzig R, Beckmann K, Körner M, Steffen F, Rohrer Bley C. A shortened whole brain radiation therapy protocol for meningoencephalitis of unknown origin in dogs. Front Vet Sci 2023; 10:1132736. [PMID: 37020978 PMCID: PMC10069678 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1132736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A variety of treatment options have been described for canine meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO). Few studies focused on radiation therapy as a second line immunomodulating treatment, implicating its effective use. However, a standard radiation therapy protocol is lacking, and further research will help to evaluate the effect of different dose regimens. Methods Ten dogs diagnosed with MUO based on MRI and CSF findings were prospectively enrolled. The dogs were treated with a shortened whole brain radiation therapy protocol (5 × 4 Gy) in combination with prednisolone. Neurologic changes were quantified using an established scoring scheme. Follow-up MRI and CSF examination was scheduled three months after radiation therapy. Overall survival and time to progression were calculated. Histopathology of the brain was performed in case of death. Results Seven dogs were diagnosed de novo and three had a history of relapsing MUO. Neurological status improved in all 10 dogs during radiation therapy, with 4/10 returning to normal shortly after radiation therapy. Three dogs died within the first three months after radiation therapy. At follow-up MRI lesions completely resolved in two dogs, partially resolved in five dogs, and progressed in one dog. After follow-up MRI, dogs were further treated with prednisolone monotherapy (two dogs) and additional immunosuppressant drugs (five dogs). Overall, four dogs showed disease progression, with a mean time to progression of 691 days (95%CI: 396-987) and mean overall survival for all dogs was 723 days (95%CI: 436-1011) (both medians not reached). Histopathology confirmed MUO in three dogs but was suggestive for oligodendroglioma in one dog. Radiation induced side effects were not seen. Conclusion Shortened whole-brain radiation therapy could be an additional treatment option for MUO in conjunction to prednisolone, specifically for cases that require rapid relief of symptoms and with relapsing history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Herzig
- Division of Neurology, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Robert Herzig
| | - Katrin Beckmann
- Division of Neurology, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian Körner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Steffen
- Division of Neurology, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Carla Rohrer Bley
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department for Small Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gondi V, Bauman G, Bradfield L, Burri SH, Cabrera AR, Cunningham DA, Eaton BR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Kim MM, Kotecha R, Kraemer L, Li J, Nagpal S, Rusthoven CG, Suh JH, Tomé WA, Wang TJC, Zimmer AS, Ziu M, Brown PD. Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:265-282. [PMID: 35534352 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended. CONCLUSIONS The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre & Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Stuart H Burri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Alvin R Cabrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wolfgang A Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Alexandra S Zimmer
- Women's Malignancies Branch, National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosciences, INOVA Neuroscience and INOVA Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gutierrez Torres S, Maldonado Magos F, Turcott JG, Hernandez‐Martinez J, Cacho‐Díaz B, Cardona A, Mota‐García A, Lozano Ruiz F, Ramos‐Ramirez M, Arrieta O. Re-irradiation in patients with progressive or recurrent brain metastases from extracranial solid tumors: A novel prognostic index. Cancer Med 2022; 12:146-158. [PMID: 35770957 PMCID: PMC9844632 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies evaluating factors associated with the survival of patients with brain metastases (BM) have focused on patients with newly diagnosed BM. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival after brain re-irradiation in order to develop a new prognostic index. METHODS This 5-year retrospective study included patients treated with repeat-radiotherapy for recurrent BM at the "Instituto Nacional de Cancerología" of Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Significant variables in the multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to create the brain re-irradiation index (BRI). Survival and group comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients receiving brain re-irradiation were identified. Most patients were women (75.4%) with a mean age at BM diagnosis of 51.4 years. Lung and breast cancer were the most prevalent neoplasms (43.9% each). Independent prognostic factors for shorter survival after re-irradiation were: Age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR]:2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.8]; p = 0.026), uncontrolled primary tumor (HR:5.5 [95% CI, 2.2-13.5]; p < 0.001), lesion size >20 mm (4.6 [95% CI, 1.7-12.2]; p = 0.002), and an interval <12 months between radiation treatments (HR:4.3 [95% CI, 1.7-10.6]; p = 0.001). Median survival (MS) after re-irradiation was 14.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-20.9).MS of patients stratified according to the BRI score was 17.38, 10.34, and 2.82 months, with significant differences between all groups. CONCLUSIONS The new BRI can be easily implemented for the prognostic classification of cancer patients with progressive or recurrent BM from extracranial solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenny G. Turcott
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Juan‐Manuel Hernandez‐Martinez
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico,Cátedras CONACYT‐Instituto Nacional de CancerologíaMexico CityMexico
| | - Bernardo Cacho‐Díaz
- Neuro‐Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Andrés F. Cardona
- Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC)BogotáColombia,Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC)BogotáColombia,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (FOX‐G/ONCOLGroup)Universidad El BosqueBogotáColombia
| | - Aida Mota‐García
- Radiotherapy UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | | | | | - Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:354-365. [PMID: 34119447 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This evidence report synthesizes the available evidence on radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS The literature search included PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, clinicaltrials.gov, and published guidelines in July 2020; independently submitted data, expert consultation, and contacting authors. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large observational studies (for safety assessments), evaluating whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone or in combination, as initial or postoperative treatment, with or without systemic therapy for adults with brain metastases due to lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma. RESULTS Ninety-seven studies reported in 189 publications were identified, but the number of analyses was limited owing to different intervention and comparator combinations as well as insufficient reporting of outcome data. Risk of bias varied, and 25 trials were terminated early, predominantly owing to poor accrual. The combination of SRS plus WBRT compared with SRS alone or WBRT alone showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69%-1.73%; 4 RCTs) or death owing to brain metastases (relative risk [RR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48%-1.81%; 3 RCTs). Radiation therapy after surgery did not improve overall survival compared with surgery alone (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76%-1.26%; 5 RCTs). Data for quality of life, functional status, and cognitive effects were insufficient to determine effects of WBRT, SRS, or postsurgery interventions. We did not find systematic differences across interventions in serious adverse events, number of adverse events, radiation necrosis, fatigue, or seizures. WBRT plus systemic therapy (RR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03%-2.00%; 14 studies) was associated with increased risks for vomiting compared with WBRT alone. CONCLUSIONS Despite the substantial research literature on radiation therapy, comparative effectiveness information is limited. There is a need for more data on patient-relevant outcomes such as quality of life, functional status, and cognitive effects.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ahluwalia M, Baehring J, Brem H, Brem S, Butowski N, Campian JL, Clark SW, Fabiano AJ, Forsyth P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Horbinski C, Junck L, Kaley T, Kumthekar P, Loeffler JS, Mrugala MM, Nagpal S, Pandey M, Parney I, Peters K, Puduvalli VK, Robins I, Rockhill J, Rusthoven C, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Swinnen LJ, Weiss S, Wen PY, Willmarth NE, Bergman MA, Darlow SD. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1537-1570. [PMID: 33152694 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Henry Brem
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Steven Brem
- 6Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jian L Campian
- 8Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Craig Horbinski
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Larry Junck
- 14University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Manjari Pandey
- 19St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- 21The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Ian Robins
- 22University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
| | - Jason Rockhill
- 23Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Lode J Swinnen
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|