Dosimetric Comparison Between Helical Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Safety and efficacy of helical tomotherapy following lung-sparing surgery in locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

To assess the value of radiation therapy (RT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) in the management of locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving no or lung-sparing surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive MPM cases not undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy and receiving intensity-modulated (IM) HT were retrospectively evaluated for local control, distant control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Impact of age, systemic treatment, RT dose, and recurrence patterns was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a secondary endpoint, reported toxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 34 localized MPM cases undergoing IMHT were identified, of which follow-up data were available for 31 patients. Grade 3 side effects were experienced by 26.7% of patients and there were no grade 4 or 5 events observed. Median PFS was 19 months. Median OS was 20 months and the rates for 1‑ and 2‑year OS were 86.2 and 41.4%, respectively. OS was significantly superior for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

IMHT of locally advanced MPM after lung-sparing surgery is safe and feasible, resulting in satisfactory local control and survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves OS. Randomized clinical trials incorporating modern RT techniques as a component of trimodal treatment are warranted to establish an evidence-based standard of care pattern for locally advanced MPM.

Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Geometrical uncertainties in patients can severely affect the quality of radiotherapy.

PURPOSE

We evaluated the dosimetric efficacy of robust optimization for helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning in the presence of patient setup uncertainty and anatomical changes.

METHODS

Two helical IMRT plans for 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were created using either minimax robust optimization (robust plan) or a conventional planning target volume (PTV) margin approach (PTV plan). Plan robustness was evaluated by creating perturbed dose plans with setup uncertainty from isocenter shifts and anatomical changes due to organ variation. The magnitudes of the geometrical uncertainties were based on the patient setup uncertainty considered during robust optimization, which was identical to the PTV margin. The homogeneity index, and target coverage (TC, defined as the V100% of the clinical target volume), and organs at risk (OAR; rectum and bladder) doses were analyzed for all nominal and perturbed plans. A statistical t-test was performed to evaluate the differences between the robust and PTV plans.

RESULTS

Comparison of the nominal plans showed that the robust plans had lower OAR doses and a worse homogeneity index and TC than the PTV plans. The evaluations of robustness that considered setup errors more than the PTV margin demonstrated that the worst-case perturbed scenarios for robust plans had significantly higher TC while maintaining lower OAR doses. However, when anatomical changes were considered, improvement in TC from robust optimization was not observed in the worst-case perturbed plans.

CONCLUSIONS

For helical IMRT planning in localized prostate cancer, robust optimization provides benefits over PTV margin-based planning, including better OAR sparing, and increased robustness against systematic patient-setup errors.

Pulmonary toxicity of craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy

Craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy (HT-CSI) has advantages in aspects of homogeneous dose distribution. Physicians, however, still have concerns of pulmonary toxicity due to HT-CSI’s relatively large, low-dose irradiated volume from continuous and 360° rotation delivery. In this study, we investigated the pulmonary toxicity of HT-CSI. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who received HT-CSI between January 2014 and December 2019. Grade 2 + pulmonary toxicities were evaluated. Intensive systemic treatment was defined as systemic treatment administration before, during, and after HT-CSI. V_{X Gy} was defined as % volume receiving ≥ X Gy. Thirteen patients (12.4%) presented with grade 2 + pulmonary toxicities after HT-CSI. Of these patients, only one experienced grade 2 radiation pneumonitis combined with pembrolizumab-induced pneumonitis. Conversely, pneumonia was observed in 12 patients. Intensive systemic treatment (p = 0.004), immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.031), and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% (p = 0.031) were identified as independent risk factors for pneumonia. The risk factor for pneumonia in pediatric patients were immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.035) and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% (p = 0.047). HT-CSI can be a safe treatment modality with tolerable pulmonary toxicities. Intensive systemic treatment, immunosuppressive drugs, and bilateral lung V_{5 Gy} ≥ 65% were significantly associated with pneumonia. In these patients, close follow-up should be considered for proper management of pneumonia.