1
|
Suleja A, Bilski M, Laukhtina E, Fazekas T, Matsukawa A, Tsuboi I, Mancon S, Schulz R, Soeterik TFW, Przydacz M, Nyk Ł, Rajwa P, Majewski W, Campi R, Shariat SF, Miszczyk M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Primary Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3276. [PMID: 39409897 PMCID: PMC11475739 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary localised RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447274). We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for reports of prospective studies published since 2003, describing the outcomes of SBRT for localised RCC. Meta-analyses were performed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events (AEs) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). Outcomes were presented as rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Risk-of-bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 2983 records, 13 prospective studies (n = 308) were included in the meta-analysis. The median diameter of the irradiated tumours ranged between 1.9 and 5.5 cm in individual studies. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 15 patients, and their estimated rate was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01-0.11; n = 291). One- and two-year LC rates were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99; n = 293) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93-0.99; n = 253), while one- and two-year OS rates were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.88-0.98; n = 294) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.91; n = 224). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity, and the estimations were consistent after excluding studies at a high risk of bias in a sensitivity analysis. Major limitations include a relatively short follow-up, inhomogeneous reporting of renal function deterioration, and a lack of prospective comparative evidence. CONCLUSIONS The short-term results suggest that SBRT is a valuable treatment method for selected inoperable patients (or those who refuse surgery) with localised RCC associated with low rates of high-grade AEs and excellent LC. However, until the long-term data from randomised controlled trials are available, surgical management remains a standard of care in operable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Suleja
- III Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Mateusz Bilski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
- Brachytherapy Department, Saint John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
- Radiotherapy Department, Saint John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8504, Japan
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timo F. W. Soeterik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mikołaj Przydacz
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Łukasz Nyk
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Wojciech Majewski
- Radiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1010 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Research Centre for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166/15731, Iran
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Collegium Medicum—Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shan Y, Zheng L, Zhang S, Qian B. Abnormal expression of FOXM1 in carcinogenesis of renal cell carcinoma: From experimental findings to clinical applications. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2024; 692:149251. [PMID: 38056162 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.149251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a prevalent malignancy within the genitourinary system. At present, patients with high-grade or advanced RCC continue to have a bleak prognosis. Mounting research have emphasized the significant involvement of Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) in RCC development and progression. Therefore, it is imperative to consolidate the existing evidence regarding the contributions of FOXM1 to RCC tumorigenesis through a comprehensive review. This study elucidated the essential functions of FOXM1 in promoting RCC growth, invasion, and metastasis by regulating cell cycle progression, DNA repair, angiogenesis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Also, FOXM1 might serve as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker as well as a therapeutic target for RCC. Clinical findings demonstrated that the expression of FOXM1 was markedly upregulated in RCC samples, while a high level of FOXM1 was found to be associated with a poor overall survival rate of RCC. Furthermore, it is worth noting that FOXM1 may have a significant impact on the resistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to radiotherapy. This observation suggests that inhibiting FOXM1 could be a promising strategy to impede the progression of RCC and enhance its sensitivity to radiotherapy. The present review highlighted the pivotal role of FOXM1 in RCC development. FOXM1 has the capacity to emerge as not only a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool but also a viable therapeutic option for unresectable RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanmei Shan
- Department of Nephrology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China
| | - Liying Zheng
- Postgraduate Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou, China
| | - Shilong Zhang
- Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Biao Qian
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China; Key Laboratory of Urology and Andrology of Ganzhou, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amiri S, Pashizeh F, Moeinabadi-Bidgoli K, Eyvazi Y, Akbari T, Salehi Moghaddam Z, Eskandarisani M, Farahmand F, Hafezi Y, Nouri Jevinani H, Seif M, Mousavi-Niri N, Chiani M, Tavakkoli Yaraki M. Co-encapsulation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs into niosomal nanocarrier for enhanced breast cancer therapy: In silico and in vitro studies. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 239:117292. [PMID: 37806480 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Combination therapy has been considered one of the most promising approaches for improving the therapeutic effects of anticancer drugs. This is the first study that uses two different antioxidants in full-characterized niosomal formulation and thoroughly evaluates their synergistic effects on breast cancer cells. In this study, in-silico studies of hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs (ascorbic acid: Asc and curcumin: Cur) interactions and release were investigated and validated by a set of in vitro experiments to reveal the significant improvement in breast cancer therapy using a co-delivery approach by niosomal nanocarrier. The niosomal nanoparticles containing surfactants (Span 60 and Tween 60) and cholesterol at 2:1 M ratio were prepared through the film hydration method. A systematic evaluation of nanoniosomes was carried out. The release profile demonstrated two phases (initial burst followed by sustained release) and a pH-dependent release schedule over 72 h. The optimized niosomal preparation displayed superior storage stability for up to 2 months at 4 °C, exhibiting extremely minor changes in pharmaceutical encapsulation efficiency and size. Free dual drugs (Asc + Cur) and dual-drug loaded niosomes (Niosomal (Asc + Cur)) enhanced the apoptotic activity and cytotoxicity and inhibited cell migration which confirmed the synergistic effect of co-encapsulated drugs. Also, significant up-regulation of p53 and Bax genes was observed in cells treated with Asc + Cur and Niosomal (Asc + Cur), while the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 gene was down-regulated. These results were in correlation with the increase in the enzyme activity of SOD, CAT, and caspase, and the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon treatment with the mentioned drugs. Furthermore, these anti-cancer effects were higher when using Niosomal (Asc + Cur) than Asc + Cur. Histopathological examination also revealed that Niosomal (Asc + Cur) had a lower mitosis index, invasion, and pleomorphism than Asc + Cur. These findings indicated that niosomal formulation for co-delivery of Asc and Cur would offer a promising delivery system for an effective breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Amiri
- Department of Genetic, Islamic Azad University, Tehran North Branch, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Pashizeh
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science Yazd, Iran
| | - Kasra Moeinabadi-Bidgoli
- Departments of Medicine and Endocrinology, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yalda Eyvazi
- School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tanin Akbari
- Department of Medical Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Salehi Moghaddam
- Department of Microbial Biotechnology, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Faranak Farahmand
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Yousef Hafezi
- School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hoda Nouri Jevinani
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Seif
- Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Neda Mousavi-Niri
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohsen Chiani
- Department of Nano Biotechnology, New Technology Research Group, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Tavakkoli Yaraki
- School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|