Review of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes

Digging deeper into necrotizing enterocolitis: bridging clinical, microbial, and molecular perspectives

Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe, life-threatening inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract, especially affecting preterm infants. This review consolidates evidence from various biomedical disciplines to elucidate the complex pathogenesis of NEC, integrating insights from clinical, microbial, and molecular perspectives. It emphasizes the modulation of NEC-associated inflammatory pathways by probiotics and novel biologics, highlighting their therapeutic potential. We further critically examine dysbiotic alterations within the gut microbiota, with a particular focus on imbalances in bacterial and viral communities, which may contribute to the onset of NEC. The intricate interactions among toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), microvascular integrity, immune activation, and the inflammatory milieu are meticulously summarized, offering a sophisticated understanding of NEC pathophysiology. This academic review aims to enhance the etiological comprehension of NEC, promote the development of targeted therapeutic interventions, and impart the significant impact of perinatal factors on the formulation of preventive and curative strategies for the disease.

Mitochondrial Neurogastrointestinal Encephalomyopathy (MNGIE) Phenotype Associated With Unique Compound Heterozygous POLG Variants: Case Presentation and Review of the Literature

We report a teenage patient with a delayed diagnosis of compound heterozygous POLG pathogenic variants [(POLG c. 1943 C>G, p.P648R) and (POLG c. 679 C>T, p.R227W)] who presented with fatigue and neuropathy, as well as long standing malnutrition and cachexia, erroneously attributed to an eating disorder. She experienced multiple bowel perforations and pathologic examination revealed jejunal diverticula and features of visceral neuromyopathy. In addition to ganglion cell mega-mitochondrial inclusions, there were multiple foci of interrupted muscularis mucosae, an alteration not previously recognized in the intestines of patients with primary mitochondrial disorders. We provide a detailed account of the gastrointestinal pathologic findings in this patient and compare with prior cases of Mitochondrial Neurogastrointestinal Encephalomyopathy (MNGIE) phenotypes.

Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

PURPOSE

Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only.

RESULTS

338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Chart Review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Necrotizing enterocolitis following spontaneous intestinal perforation in very low birth weight neonates

PURPOSE

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) are severe gastrointestinal complications of prematurity. The clinical presentation and treatment of NEC and SIP (peritoneal drain vs laparotomy) can overlap; however, the pathogenesis is distinct. Therefore, a patient initially treated for SIP can subsequently develop NEC. This phenomenon has only been described in case reports, and no risk factor evaluation exists. We evaluate clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of patients treated for a distinct episode of NEC after SIP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates who presented with pneumoperitoneum between 07/2004 and 09/2022. Data was obtained from two separate neonatal intensive care units that were part of the same institution. Patients with an initial preoperative, intraoperative, or pathological diagnosis of NEC were excluded. Patients with an intraoperative diagnosis of SIP or preoperative diagnosis of SIP successfully treated with a peritoneal drain (PD) were evaluated. Patients subsequently treated (medically or surgically) for NEC after SIP were then compared to SIP-alone patients. Clinical characteristics included demographics, gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), perinatal risk factors (chorioamnionitis, steroids, indomethacin), postoperative feeding regimen, and length of stay (LOS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 278 patients included, 31 (11.2%) patients had NEC after SIP. There was no difference in GA (25 weeks vs 25 weeks, p = 0.933) or BW (760 g vs 735 g, p = 0.370) between NEC after SIP vs SIP alone cohorts, respectively. Twenty (64%) of NEC after-SIP patients were previously treated with LP. NEC after SIP occurred with a median onset of 56 days. Pneumatosis was the most frequent (81%) presenting symptom and 12 (39%) patients had hematochezia. Four (12.9%) patients required LP for NEC and all had NEC intraoperatively and on pathology. A majority (77.4%) of patients were on breast milk (BM) at time of NEC diagnosis. NEC after SIP patients had lower maternal age at delivery (29.0 vs 25.0, p = 0.055) and the incidence of NEC after LP (primary or failed drain) was higher than PD alone (16.7% vs 6.2%, p = 0.007). NEC after SIP patients had longer LOS (135 vs 81, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We report an 11.2% incidence of NEC at a median of 56 days following successful treatment of SIP, resulting in increased LOS. SIP patients are a high-risk cohort and protocols to prevent this phenomenon should be investigated.

Is There Still a Role for Peritoneal Drains in Neonatal Pneumoperitoneum? A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Although pneumoperitoneum from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation is a surgical emergency, risk stratification to determine which neonates benefit from initial peritoneal drainage (PD) is lacking.

METHODS

Using a single-center retrospective review of very low birth weight neonates under 1500 g who underwent PD for pneumoperitoneum (January 2015 to December 2023) from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation, two cohorts were created: drain "responders" (patients managed definitively with PD; includes placement of a second drain) and "nonresponders" (patients who underwent subsequent laparotomy or died after PD). Antenatal/postnatal characteristics, periprocedural clinical data, and hospital outcomes were compared between responders and nonresponders using Student's t-test, chi-squared test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six neonates were included: 31 (55%) drain responders and 25 (45%) nonresponders. Birth weight, gestational age, sex, ethnicity, use of postnatal steroids, and enteral feeds were similar between the cohorts. Nonresponders had higher base deficits (-3.4 versus -5.0, P = 0.032) and FiO2 (0.25 versus 0.52, P = 0.001) after drain placement. Drain responders had significantly shorter lengths of stay (89 versus 148 days, P = 0.014) and lower mortality (6.4% versus 56%, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of the nonresponders showed no differences in birth weight, vasopressor requirement, FiO2, or postdrain base deficit between nonresponders who had a drain alone versus laparotomy following drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

PD remains a viable initial therapy for pneumoperitoneum in premature very low birth weight neonates (< 1500 g), demonstrating clinical response in more than half. Ongoing clinical assessment and judgment is imperative after drain placement to ensure continued clinical improvement.

Understanding necrotizing enterocolitis endotypes and acquired intestinal injury phenotypes from a historical and artificial intelligence perspective

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a devastating disease in preterm and term neonates. Despite significant progress made in understanding NEC pathogenesis over the last 50 years, the inability of current definitions to discriminate the various pathophysiological processes underlying NEC has led to an umbrella term that limits clinical and research progress. In this mini review, we provide a historical perspective on how NEC definitions and pathogenesis have evolved to our current understanding of NEC endotypes. We also discuss how artificial intelligence-based approaches are influencing our knowledge of risk-factors, classification and prognosis of NEC and other neonatal intestinal injury phenotypes.

Neonatal Gastrointestinal Perforations: A 4-year Experience in a Single Centre

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) during the neonatal period is still a significant problem despite improved neonatal care. The study aimed to report on incidence, management, morbidity and mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of neonates with GIPs between October 2018 and November 2022 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

There were 47 patients, 22 (46.8%) males and 25 (53.2%) females. The incidence of neonatal GIP was 0.39% amongst all newborns treated in the neonatal intensive care unit. The mean gestational age was 30.4 ± 4.5 (23-38) weeks, and the mean birth weight was 1493.08 ± 753 (580-2940) g. Of 47 neonates, 5 (10.6%) were full term and 42 (89.4%) were preterm. The mean age of surgery was 12.25 ± 9.89 (0-41) days. A laparotomy was performed in 43 (91.4%) of 47 neonates, while seven of the patients underwent surgical intervention after decompression by percutaneous drainage. Four patients were managed with peritoneal drainage alone due to poor general condition. The pathologies unrelated to necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) were the most common cause of GIPs (55.3%) and included spontaneous intestinal perforation (n = 18), stomach perforation (n = 4), segmental volvulus (n = 2), acute mesenteric ischaemia (n = 1) and meconium peritonitis (n = 1). Overall survival was 55.4%.

CONCLUSION

GIPs are one of the most significant causes of mortality in newborns. The most common cause of perforations is non-NEC entities and can be seen in the entire intestinal system from the stomach to the colon. Surgical exploration is still the primary management model.

A Multi-Institutional Study Comparing Stoma Location in Neonates With Intestinal Perforation

INTRODUCTION

Neonates with intestinal perforation often require laparotomy and intestinal stoma creation, with the stoma placed in either the laparotomy incision or a separate site. We aimed to investigate if stoma location is associated with risk of postoperative wound complications.

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review was performed for neonates ≤3 mo who underwent emergent laparotomy and intestinal stoma creation for intestinal perforation between January 1, 2009 and April 1, 2021. Patients were stratified by stoma location (laparotomy incision versus separate site). Outcomes included wound infection/dehiscence, stoma irritation, retraction, stricture, and prolapse. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with postoperative wound complications, controlling for gestational age, age and weight at surgery, and diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, 79 neonates of median gestational age 28.8 wk (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.0-34.2 wk), median age 5 d (IQR: 2-11 d) and median weight 1.4 kg (IQR: 0.9-2.42 kg) had perforated bowel from necrotizing enterocolitis (40.5%), focal intestinal perforation (31.6%), or other etiologies (27.8%). Stomas were placed in the laparotomy incision for 41 (51.9%) patients and separate sites in 38 (48.1%) patients. Wound infection/dehiscence occurred in 7 (17.1%) neonates with laparotomy stomas and 5 (13.2%) neonates with separate site stomas (P = 0.63). There were no significant differences in peristomal irritation, stoma retraction, or stoma stricture between the two groups. On multivariable regression, separate site stomas were associated with increased likelihood of prolapse (odds ratio 6.54; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-37.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Stoma incorporation within the laparotomy incision is not associated with wound complications. Separate site stomas may be associated with prolapse. Patient factors should be considered when planning stoma location in neonates undergoing surgery for intestinal perforation.

Comparison of preoperative and intraoperative surgeon diagnosis and pathologic findings in spontaneous intestinal perforation vs necrotizing enterocolitis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis via comparison to pathologic diagnosis in spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) vs. necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of neonates <1500 g treated for pneumoperitoneum between 07/2004-09/2022 was conducted. Patients treated for NEC medically prior to diagnosis and those treated with drain only were excluded. Fleiss' Kappa analysis assessed agreement between all three diagnoses: preoperative, intraoperative, and pathologic.

RESULT

Overall, 125 patients were included with mean birthweight 834.2 g (SD:259.2) and mean gestational age 25.8 weeks (SD:2.2). Preoperative and intraoperative diagnoses agreed in 90.3%, intraoperative and pathologic agreed in 71.1%, and preoperative and pathologic agreed in 75.2% of patients. Fleiss' Kappa was 0.55 (95% CI:0.43,0.68), indicating moderate agreement between the three diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows moderate agreement between preoperative, intraoperative, and pathologic diagnoses. Further studies investigating the clinical characteristics of SIP and NEC are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and management.

Applications of indocyanine greenenhanced fluorescence in the laparoscopic treatment of colonic stricture after necrotizing enterocolitis

BACKGROUND

The status of anastomotic blood perfusion is associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis. Fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) can objectively assess intestinal blood perfusion. This study aims to investigate whether anastomotic perfusion assessment with ICG influences surgical decision-making during laparoscopic intestinal resection and primary anastomosis for colonic stricture after necrotizing enterocolitis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic intestinal resection and primary anastomosis between January 2022 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Before intestinal anastomosis, the ICG fluorescence technology was used to evaluate the blood perfusion of intestinal tubes on both sides of the anastomosis. After the completion of primary anastomosis, the anastomotic blood perfusion was assessed again.

RESULTS

Of the 13 cases, laparoscopy was used to determine the extent of the diseased bowel to be excised, and the normal bowel was preserved for anastomosis. The anastomosis was established under the guidance of ICG fluorescence technology, and FA was performed after anastomosis to confirm good blood flow in the proximal bowel. The anastomotic intestinal tube was changed in one case because FA showed a difference between the normal range of intestinal blood flow and the macroscopic prediction. There was no evidence of ICG allergy, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, or other complications. The median follow-up was 6 months, and all patients recovered well.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICG fluorescence technology is helpful in precisely and efficiently determining the anastomotic intestinal blood flow during stricture resection and in avoiding anastomotic leakage caused by poor anastomotic intestinal blood flow to some extent, with satisfactory short-term efficacy.

Development of an international core outcome set for treatment trials in necrotizing enterocolitis-a study protocol

AIM

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most lethal disease of the gastrointestinal tract of preterm infants. New and existing management strategies need clinical evaluation. Large heterogeneity exists in the selection, measurement, and reporting of outcome measures in NEC intervention studies. This hampers meta-analyses and the development of evidence-based management guidelines. We aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for NEC that includes the most relevant outcomes for patients and physicians, from moment of diagnosis into adulthood. This COS is designed for use in NEC treatment trials, in infants with confirmed NEC.

METHODS

This study is designed according to COS-STAD (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development) recommendations and the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative Handbook. We obtained a waiver from the Ethics Review Board and prospectively registered this study with COMET (Study 1920). We will approach 125 clinicians and/or researchers from low-middle and high-income countries based on their scientific output (using SCIVAL, a bibliometric tool). Patients and parents will be approached through local patient organisations. Participants will be separated into three panels, to assess differences in priorities between former patients and parents (1. lay panel), clinicians and researchers involved in the neonatal period (2. neonatal panel) and after the neonatal period (3. post-neonatal panel). They will be presented with outcomes currently used in NEC research, identified through a systematic review, in a Delphi process. Eligible outcome domains are also identified from the patients and parents' perspectives. Using a consensus process, including three online Delphi rounds and a final face-to-face consensus meeting, the COS will be finalised and include outcomes deemed essential to all stakeholders: health care professionals, parents and patients' representatives. The final COS will be reported in accordance with the COS-Standards for reporting (COS-STAR) statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of an international COS will help to improve homogeneity of outcome measure reporting in NEC, will enable adequate and efficient comparison of treatment strategies, and will help the interpretation and implementation of clinical trial results. This will contribute to high-quality evidence regarding the best treatment strategy for NEC in preterm infants.

Gut Microbiome-Brain Axis as an Explanation for the Risk of Poor Neurodevelopment Outcome in Preterm Infants with Necrotizing Enterocolitis

Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) is characterized by an inflammation of intestinal tissue that primarily affects premature infants. It is the most common and devastating gastrointestinal morbidity of prematurity, but beyond intestinal morbidity, this condition has also been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental delays that persist beyond infancy. Prematurity, enteral feeding, bacterial colonization, and prolonged exposure to antibiotics are all risk factors that predispose preterm infants to NEC. Interestingly, these factors are all also associated with the gut microbiome. However, whether or not there is a connection between the microbiome and the risk of neurodevelopmental delays in infants after NEC is still an emerging area of research. Furthermore, how microbes in the gut could impact a distant organ such as the brain is also poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of NEC and the role of the gut microbiome-brain axis in neurodevelopmental outcomes after NEC. Understanding the potential role of the microbiome in neurodevelopmental outcomes is important as the microbiome is modifiable and thus offers the hope of improved therapeutic options. We highlight the progress and limitations in this field. Insights into the gut microbiome-brain axis may offer potential therapeutic approaches to improve the long-term outcomes of premature infants.