Impact of a targeted isolation strategy at intensive-care-unit-admission on intensive-care-unit-acquired infection related to multidrug-resistant bacteria: a prospective uncontrolled before-after study

Validation of a rapid molecular detection test for gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacteria in rectal swabs upon admission of patients to the intensive care unit

In ICU settings, screening patients upon admission for potential multiresistant bacteria (BMR) carriers is crucial. Traditionally, clinical decisions relied on delayed culture results, but a rapid PCR molecular test called RealCycler-Rezero-U/G (Progenie-molecular©), emerged as an alternative. This study aimed to validate its effectiveness in detecting gram-negative BMR in rectal swabs at ICU admission. Over 24 months, an observational study was conducted on 1,234 admitted patients, with 217 meeting isolation criteria and undergoing both PCR and culture tests. Results showed a 17.5 % positive rate for screening. The PCR test exhibited impressive accuracy at 98.6 % and a strong negative predictive value of 99.4 %. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.98, indicating high reliability. Notably, PCR results were available 44.5 h earlier than culture. In conclusion, PCR-based molecular testing for gram-negative BMR offers excellent diagnostic performance and a valuable negative predictive value, making it a suitable screening tool for ICU admissions.

Association between multidrug-resistant bacteria and outcomes in intensive care unit patients: a non-interventional study

Background

In intensive care units (ICUs), infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms should be monitored to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

Methods

From 2018 to 2020, we investigated all medical records of patients admitted to the ICU of a public university hospital. All patients colonized/infected by MDR microorganisms and submitted to active surveillance cultures (ASCs) were included.

Results and discussion

Male patients prevailed, and 9.5% were positive for MDR bacteria. In-hospital deaths were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for older patients, patients with orotracheal tube use during previous and current hospitalization, and patients with high blood pressure, cardiac and pulmonary diseases, and chronic kidney disease. Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae was the most frequently resistance profile, followed by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. The diagnosis or evolution of HAIs was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) for patients treated with meropenem and vancomycin, and in-hospital deaths occurred in 29.5% of patients using polypeptides while the use of macrolides reduced the odds for mortality. The BRADEN Scale demonstrated that 50% of the patients were at high risk of dying.

Conclusion

Patients hospitalized in the ICU, colonized or infected by MDR bacteria, using invasive medical devices, and with underlying medical conditions presented increased mortality rates. The prescription of meropenem and vancomycin should be carefully monitored once patients using these antimicrobials already have or develop an HAI.

Validation of a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization risk prediction model: A retrospective cohort study in Korean intensive care units

BACKGROUND

To assess the external validity of a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization risk prediction model (CREP-model).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 414 patients admitted to the intensive care units of a tertiary hospital from November 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018. Data were collected via medical record review, and we analyzed the performance of the CREP-model by assessment of calibration, discrimination, clinical usefulness, and uniformity-of-fit.

RESULTS

The validation subjects showed differences in age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, mechanical ventilation days, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonization rate from those of the CREP-model development subjects. The calibration-in-the-large was 0.069 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.065-0.074), and calibration slope was 1.114 (95% CI, 1.091-1.136). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.883 (95% CI, 0.838-0.928). At the predicted risk of 0.25, the sensitivity, specificity, and correct classification rates were 81.3%, 79.8%, and 80.0%, respectively, and the net benefit according to the model was 0.035 with 64 fewer false-positive results per 100 patients. The calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness showed similar results among subjects stratified according to sex, age group, medical department, and admission source.

CONCLUSIONS

The CREP-model showed good performance in the validation sample; therefore, we recommend introducing the CREP-model into intensive care units of tertiary hospitals to improve decision-making.

Disparity of the "screen-and-isolate" policy for multidrug-resistant organisms: A national survey in French adult ICUs

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) has dramatically increased. The aim of this survey was to describe and analyze the different screening and isolation policies regarding MDROs in French adult intensive care units (ICUs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter online survey was performed among French ICUs, including 63 questions distributed into 4 parts: characteristics of the unit, MDRO screening policy, policy regarding contact precautions, and ecology of the unit.

RESULTS

From April 2015 to June 2016, 73 of 301 ICUs (24%) participated in the survey. MDRO screening was performed on admission in 96% of ICUs, for at least 1 MDRO (78%). MDRO screening was performed weekly during ICU stay in 83% of ICUs. Preemptive isolation was initiated on admission in 82% of ICUs, mostly in a targeted way (71%). Imported and acquired MDRO rates >10% were reported in 44% and 27% of ICUs, respectively. An MDRO outbreak had occurred within the past 3 years in 48% of cases.

CONCLUSION

French ICUs have variable screening and isolation approaches for MDROs, as up to 10 combinations were met. Discrepancies with the 2009 national guidelines were observed. Very few ICUs practice without some form of screening and isolation of patients upon admission.

Universal versus targeted additional contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organism carriage for patients admitted to an intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Although additional contact precautions (ACPs) are routinely used to reduce cross-transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), the relevance of isolation precautions remains debated. We hypothesized that the collection of recognized risk factors for MDRO carriage on intensive care unit (ICU) admission might be helpful to target ACPs without increasing MDRO acquisition during ICU stays, compared with universal ACPs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a sequential single-center observational study performed in consecutive patients admitted to a French medical and surgical ICU. During the first 6-month period, screening for MDRO carriage and ACPs were performed in all patients. During the second 6-month period, screening was maintained, but ACP use was guided by the presence of at least 1 defined risk factor for MDRO.

RESULTS

During both periods, 33 (10%) and 30 (10%) among 327 and 297 admissions were, respectively, associated with a positive admission MDRO carriage. During both periods, a second screening was performed in 147 (45%) and 127 (43%) patients. Altogether, the rate of acquired MDRO (positive screening or clinical specimen) was similar during both periods (10% [n = 15] and 11.8% [n = 15], respectively; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study contribute to support the safety of an isolation-targeted screening policy on ICU admission compared with universal screening and isolation regarding the rate of ICU-acquired MDRO colonization or infection.

Colonization pressure as a risk factor of ICU-acquired multidrug resistant bacteria: a prospective observational study

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of colonization pressure on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired multidrug resistant bacteria (MDRB). All patients hospitalized for more than 48 h in the ICU were included in this prospective observational study. MDRB were defined as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime or imipenem, Gram-negative bacilli producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), and all strains of Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Colonization pressure was daily calculated in the three participating ICUs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for ICU-acquired MDRB. Two hundreds and four (34%) of the 593 included patients acquired an MDRB during their ICU stay. Multivariate analysis identified colonization pressure as an independent risk factor for ICU-acquired MDRB (OR (95% CI) 4.18 (1.03-17.01), p = 0.046). Other independent risk factors for ICU-acquired MDRB were mechanical ventilation (3.08 (1.28-7.38), p = 0.012), and arterial catheter use (OR, 3.04 (1.38-6.68), p = 0.006). ICU-acquired MDRB were associated with increased mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay. However, ICU-acquired MDRB was not independently associated with ICU-mortality. Colonization pressure is an independent risk factor for acquiring MDRB in the ICU.