1
|
Thompson YT, Li Y, Silovsky J. From Scientific Research to Practical Implementations: Applications to Improve Data Quality in Child Welfare. J Behav Health Serv Res 2024; 51:289-301. [PMID: 38153681 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-023-09875-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Child welfare decisions have life-impacting consequences which, often times, are underpinned by limited or inadequate data and poor quality. Though research of data quality has gained popularity and made advancements in various practical areas, it has not made significant inroads for child welfare fields or data systems. Poor data quality can hinder service decision-making, impacting child behavioral health and well-being as well as increasing unnecessary expenditure of time and resources. Poor data quality can also undermine the validity of research and slow policymaking processes. The purpose of this commentary is to summarize the data quality research base in other fields, describe obstacles and uniqueness to improve data quality in child welfare, and propose necessary steps to scientific research and practical implementation that enables researchers and practitioners to improve the quality of child welfare services based on the enhanced quality of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutian T Thompson
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Yaqi Li
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| | - Jane Silovsky
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Declerck J, Kalra D, Vander Stichele R, Coorevits P. Frameworks, Dimensions, Definitions of Aspects, and Assessment Methods for the Appraisal of Quality of Health Data for Secondary Use: Comprehensive Overview of Reviews. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12:e51560. [PMID: 38446534 PMCID: PMC10955383 DOI: 10.2196/51560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care has not reached the full potential of the secondary use of health data because of-among other issues-concerns about the quality of the data being used. The shift toward digital health has led to an increase in the volume of health data. However, this increase in quantity has not been matched by a proportional improvement in the quality of health data. OBJECTIVE This review aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the existing frameworks for data quality dimensions and assessment methods for the secondary use of health data. In addition, it aims to consolidate the results into a unified framework. METHODS A review of reviews was conducted including reviews describing frameworks of data quality dimensions and their assessment methods, specifically from a secondary use perspective. Reviews were excluded if they were not related to the health care ecosystem, lacked relevant information related to our research objective, and were published in languages other than English. RESULTS A total of 22 reviews were included, comprising 22 frameworks, with 23 different terms for dimensions, and 62 definitions of dimensions. All dimensions were mapped toward the data quality framework of the European Institute for Innovation through Health Data. In total, 8 reviews mentioned 38 different assessment methods, pertaining to 31 definitions of the dimensions. CONCLUSIONS The findings in this review revealed a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the terminology, definitions, and assessment methods for data quality dimensions. This creates ambiguity and difficulties in developing specific assessment methods. This study goes a step further by assigning all observed definitions to a consolidated framework of 9 data quality dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Declerck
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Unit of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- The European Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dipak Kalra
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Unit of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- The European Institute for Innovation through Health Data, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Robert Vander Stichele
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pascal Coorevits
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Unit of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Combi C, Facelli JC, Haddawy P, Holmes JH, Koch S, Liu H, Meyer J, Peleg M, Pozzi G, Stiglic G, Veltri P, Yang CC. The IHI Rochester Report 2022 on Healthcare Informatics Research: Resuming After the CoViD-19. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH 2023; 7:169-202. [PMID: 37359193 PMCID: PMC10150351 DOI: 10.1007/s41666-023-00126-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
In 2020, the CoViD-19 pandemic spread worldwide in an unexpected way and suddenly modified many life issues, including social habits, social relationships, teaching modalities, and more. Such changes were also observable in many different healthcare and medical contexts. Moreover, the CoViD-19 pandemic acted as a stress test for many research endeavors, and revealed some limitations, especially in contexts where research results had an immediate impact on the social and healthcare habits of millions of people. As a result, the research community is called to perform a deep analysis of the steps already taken, and to re-think steps for the near and far future to capitalize on the lessons learned due to the pandemic. In this direction, on June 09th-11th, 2022, a group of twelve healthcare informatics researchers met in Rochester, MN, USA. This meeting was initiated by the Institute for Healthcare Informatics-IHI, and hosted by the Mayo Clinic. The goal of the meeting was to discuss and propose a research agenda for biomedical and health informatics for the next decade, in light of the changes and the lessons learned from the CoViD-19 pandemic. This article reports the main topics discussed and the conclusions reached. The intended readers of this paper, besides the biomedical and health informatics research community, are all those stakeholders in academia, industry, and government, who could benefit from the new research findings in biomedical and health informatics research. Indeed, research directions and social and policy implications are the main focus of the research agenda we propose, according to three levels: the care of individuals, the healthcare system view, and the population view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pierangelo Veltri
- University Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy
- University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Five-dimensional evaluation system and perceptron intelligent computing performance measurement methods based on medical heterogeneous equipment health data. Neural Comput Appl 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08316-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
|
5
|
Stausberg J, Harkener S, Semler SC. Recent Trends in Patient Registries for Health Services Research. Methods Inf Med 2021; 60:e1-e8. [PMID: 33862662 PMCID: PMC8294939 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background
Patient registries are an established methodology in health services research. Since more than 150 years, registries collect information concerning groups of similar patients to answer research questions. Elaborated recommendations about an appropriate development and an efficient operation of registries are available. However, the scene changes rapidly.
Objectives
The aim of the study is to describe current trends in registry research for health services research.
Methods
Registries developed within a German funding scheme for model registries in health services research were analyzed. The observations were compared with recent recommendations of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) on registries in the 21st century.
Results
Analyzing six registries from the funding scheme revealed the following trends: recruiting healthy individuals, representing familial or other interpersonal relationships, recording of patient-reported experiences or outcomes, accepting participants as study sites, active informing of participants, integrating the registry with other data collections, and transferring data from the registry to electronic patient records. This list partly complies with the issues discussed by the AHRQ. The AHRQ structured its ideas in five chapters, increasing focus on the patient, engaging patients as partners, digital health and patient registries, direct-to-patient registry, and registry networks.
Conclusion
For the near future, it can be said that the concept and the design of a registry should place the patient in the center. Registries will be increasingly linked together and interconnected with other data collections. New challenges arise regarding the management of data quality and the interpretation of results from less controlled settings. Here, further research related to the methodology of registries is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Stausberg
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Sonja Harkener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Faculty of Medicine, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Sebastian C Semler
- TMF Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liaw ST, Guo JGN, Ansari S, Jonnagaddala J, Godinho MA, Borelli AJ, de Lusignan S, Capurro D, Liyanage H, Bhattal N, Bennett V, Chan J, Kahn MG. Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: A literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:1591-1599. [PMID: 33496785 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Data quality (DQ) must be consistently defined in context. The attributes, metadata, and context of longitudinal real-world data (RWD) have not been formalized for quality improvement across the data production and curation life cycle. We sought to complete a literature review on DQ assessment frameworks, indicators and tools for research, public health, service, and quality improvement across the data life cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Databases from health, physical and social sciences were used: Cinahl, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Emcare, PsycINFO, Compendex, and Inspec. Embase was used instead of PubMed (an interface to search MEDLINE) because it includes all MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms used and journals in MEDLINE as well as additional unique journals and conference abstracts. A combined data life cycle and quality framework guided the search of published and gray literature for DQ frameworks, indicators, and tools. At least 2 authors independently identified articles for inclusion and extracted and categorized DQ concepts and constructs. All authors discussed findings iteratively until consensus was reached. RESULTS The 120 included articles yielded concepts related to contextual (data source, custodian, and user) and technical (interoperability) factors across the data life cycle. Contextual DQ subcategories included relevance, usability, accessibility, timeliness, and trust. Well-tested computable DQ indicators and assessment tools were also found. CONCLUSIONS A DQ assessment framework that covers intrinsic, technical, and contextual categories across the data life cycle enables assessment and management of RWD repositories to ensure fitness for purpose. Balancing security, privacy, and FAIR principles requires trust and reciprocity, transparent governance, and organizational cultures that value good documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siaw-Teng Liaw
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason Guan Nan Guo
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sameera Ansari
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jitendra Jonnagaddala
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Myron Anthony Godinho
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alder Jose Borelli
- WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Capurro
- Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Harshana Liyanage
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Navreet Bhattal
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Vicki Bennett
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jaclyn Chan
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Michael G Kahn
- Department of Pediatrics (Section of Informatics and Data Sciences), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|