Workers' compensation: a historical review and description of a legal and social insurance system

Workers' Compensation: The Burden on Healthcare Resource Utilization After Foot and Ankle Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to investigate the amount of healthcare resources dedicated to patients with WC after common foot or ankle procedures compared with a procedure-matched control group.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with WC and without WC undergoing foot and ankle procedures. Measures of healthcare burden included clinical communications, documents, prescriptions, office visits, and days to return to work and clinic discharge.

RESULTS

Collectively, 142 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with workers' compensation had increased office communication encounters (P < 0.001), processed documents (P < 0.001), medication prescriptions (P < 0.001), number of office visits (P < 0.001), number of days until return to work (P < 0.001), and days until final disposition from clinic (P < 0.001). Patients with workers' compensation were more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.3; P = 0.04), secondary surgeries (OR 8.2; 95% CI, 2.3 to 29.4; P < 0.001), and new complaints during the perioperative period (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 4.0; P = 0.07) but were less likely to cancel appointments (OR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.86; P = 0.02).

DISCUSSION

When undergoing common foot and ankle orthopaedic procedures, patients with WC demonstrated increased healthcare utilization of resources. This included more office staff work burden dedicated to patients with WC for longer amounts of time, effectively doubling the effort of a non-WC cohort.

The Role of the Orthopaedic Surgeon in Workers' Compensation Cases

Workers' compensation is an employer-funded insurance program that provides financial and medical benefits for employees injured at work. Because many occupational injuries are musculoskeletal in nature, the orthopaedic surgeon plays an important role in the workers' compensation system. Along with establishing the correct diagnosis and implementing an appropriate treatment plan, the clinician must understand the fundamental components of the workers' compensation system to manage an injured employee. Ultimately, effective claim management requires collaboration among the employer, the employee, the legal representatives, the insurance company, and the orthopaedic surgeon.

Occupational Health and Sleep Issues in Underserved Populations

Sleep disorders and occupational hazards, injuries, and illnesses impact an individual's overall health. In the United States, substantial racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in sleep and occupational health. Primary care physicians working in underserved communities should be aware of this disparity and target these higher-risk populations for focused evaluation and intervention.

Geographic Variation in Early MRI for Acute Work-Related Low Back Pain and Associated Factors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using medical claims data.

OBJECTIVE

To document the extent of geographic variation in utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for working-age patients early in the course of acute, disabling low back pain (LBP); to identify potential factors associated with the most extreme variations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although guidelines discourage MRI in acute uncomplicated LBP, this practice is highly prevalent. Geographic variation in radiologic testing is common, and may indicate problems with access or quality of care, yet this has not been studied in working-age patients with LBP (a frequent cause for acute care visits).

METHODS

All cases of acute, disabling LBP with onset between 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2007 were selected from a large workers' compensation data source. Detailed information from medical bills was used to identify persons who received early MRI (within 30 days of onset), classify cases by LBP severity, and exclude those with concurrent injuries or diseases, and/or prior LBP disability. Individual predictors included age, gender, job tenure, and industry. State-level predictors included economic, physician supply and practice variables, workers compensation system features, and MRI testing location. Generalized linear mixed models were constructed to evaluate within- and between-state variability, selecting the six highest and six lowest MRI utilization states.

RESULTS

State rates of early MRI scanning varied from 6.0% to 58.4%. In the 12 selected most extreme states, non-hospital MRI sites and lower state median income were associated with higher rates of early MRIs, explaining 84% of between-state variation, and 12.5% of all observed variability. Inter-state differences in MRI rates were greatest for lower-severity cases. Higher severity diagnoses were more common in high utilization states.

CONCLUSIONS

Between-state inappropriate early MRI variability is largely explained by rate of non-hospital MRI sites and state median income. Potential solutions include efforts to address inappropriate referral patterns based on private MRI facility ownership, and to improve quality of communication with low-income patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The Impact of Worker's Compensation Claims on Outcomes and Costs Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched pair cohort analysis using a prospectively maintained registry.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the findings associated with workers' compensation (WC) claimants in regard to surgical outcomes, costs, and reimbursement after a 1- or 2- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

WC patients are perceived to demonstrate poor surgical outcomes and greater health care expenditure than more traditional patients. This study aims to evaluate the perceived differences in financial costs between patients with and without WC insurance.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 352 patients who underwent a primary 1- or 2- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative spinal etiologies between 2007 and 2013 by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were stratified on the basis of the payer status (WC vs. non-WC). Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, smoking status, pre- and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, procedural time, estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, complications, and revisions/reoperations were assessed between cohorts. The 1-year arthrodesis rate was also evaluated via computed tomography. Two cohorts of 30 patients were then matched for the number of fusion levels, smoking, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores to compare hospital costs and reimbursements. All financial data were reported as a ratio of non-WC to WC payment/charges to protect hospital-sensitive financial data. Statistical analysis was performed using the independent sample t test for continuous variables and χ analysis for categorical data. An α level of less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients were included in this study of which 132 (37.5%) carried WC as the primary payer. The WC cohort was significantly younger (45.2 ± 8.5 vs. 52.9 ± 11.9, P < 0.001) and demonstrated a reduced comorbidity burden (2.3 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) compared with non-WC patients. In addition, the WC cohort consisted of a significantly greater proportion of males, non-Caucasians, and active tobacco users. The preoperative VAS score, number of fusion levels, procedural time, and hospital length of stay did not significantly vary between cohorts. The 6-month VAS scores (3.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.3 ± 2.4, P < 0.05), pseudarthrosis rates (7.6% vs. 0.9%, P < 0.001), revision/reoperations (12.9% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001), and smoking rates (29.8% vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05) were significantly increased among WC payers. The difference in the total charges for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion between the WC cohort and the non-WC cohort was not statistically significant. The costs associated with implants, anesthesia, operating room, and in-hospital therapy were comparable between cohorts. The WC cohort was associated with a 282% higher reimbursement rate than the non-WC cohort (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The WC cohort demonstrated lower clinical improvement, reduced 1-year arthrodesis rate, and an increased incidence of revision/reoperations when compared with non-WC patients. The greater proportion of smokers and increased occupational demands within the WC cohort may help explain these findings. Reimbursement rates were significantly higher in the WC patients. However, costs to the health care system during the acute hospitalization period (implants, operating room resources, postoperative care, and therapy) were similar between cohorts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A primer for workers' compensation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A physician's role within a workers' compensation injury extends far beyond just evaluation and treatment with several socioeconomic and psychological factors at play compared with similar injuries occurring outside of the workplace. Although workers' compensation statutes vary among states, all have several basic features with the overall goal of returning the injured worker to maximal function in the shortest time period, with the least residual disability and shortest time away from work.

PURPOSE

To help physicians unfamiliar with the workers' compensation process accomplish these goals.

STUDY DESIGN

Review.

METHODS

Educational review.

RESULTS

The streamlined review addresses the topics of why is workers' compensation necessary; what does workers' compensation cover; progression after work injury; impairment and maximum medical improvement, including how to use the sixth edition of American Medical Association's (AMA) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (Guides); completion of work injury claim after impairment rating; independent medical evaluation; and causation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the "no-fault" workers' compensation system, physicians play a key role in progressing the claim along and, more importantly, getting the injured worker back to work as soon as safely possible. Physicians should remain familiar with the workers' compensation process, along with how to properly use the AMA Guides.