Reliability of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of antero-posterior knee joint laxity

Arthroscopic Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair Restores Anterior Tibial Translation Intraoperatively at Time Zero With No Additional Effect of Suture Augmentation

PURPOSE

To intraoperatively evaluate the ability of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR) to restore anterior tibial translation (ATT) at time zero and to assess the influence of additional suture augmentation (SA) on ATT.

METHODS

Patients with proximal ACL tears undergoing arthroscopic ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation were included in this time-zero clinical study. Laxity measurements were taken with a digital arthrometer to evaluate ATT stability preoperatively in the office (T0) as a standardized diagnostic tool, preoperatively under anesthesia (T1), at time zero intraoperatively after ACLPR but prior to SA fixation (T2), and after SA fixation (T3).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 35.1 ± 12.0 years) with proximal ACL tears and significant preoperative (T0) ATT side-to-side differences (SSDs) (mean ± SD, 4.1 ± 1.5 mm) were evaluated. ACLPR was shown to restore ATT SSD at time zero (mean ± SD, 0.2 ± 1.1 mm) given that a significant reduction in ATT SSD (mean difference ± standard error, -4.7 ± 0.21 mm; P < .001) was achieved when comparing preoperative and intraoperative measurements after separate refixation of both ACL bundles with suture anchors. Additional SA fixation did not further decrease ATT when comparing measurements of the ipsilateral leg after ACL refixation and after SA fixation (mean difference ± SD, 0.03 ± 0.22 mm; P = .496).

CONCLUSIONS

ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation restores time-zero ATT laxity in adults with proximal ACL tears. Additional SA fixation in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides important information about the effectiveness of ACLPR in restoring ATT. SA with the knee fixed in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT; therefore, augmentation may not lead to overconstraint of the knee or stress shielding of the repaired ACL.

Internal Rotation Measurement of the Knee with Polymer-Based Capacitive Strain Gauges versus Mechanical Rotation Measurement Taking Gender Differences into Account: A Comparative Analysis

With the conventional mechanical rotation measurement of joints, only static measurements are possible with the patient at rest. In the future, it would be interesting to carry out dynamic rotation measurements, for example, when walking or participating in sports. Therefore, a measurement method with an elastic polymer-based capacitive measuring system was developed and validated. In our system, the measurement setup was comprised of a capacitive strain gauge made from a polymer, which was connected to a flexible printed circuit board. The electronics integrated into the printed circuit board allowed data acquisition and transmission. As the sensor strip was elongated, it caused a change in the spacing between the strain gauge's electrodes, leading to a modification in capacitance. Consequently, this alteration in capacitance enabled the measurement of strain. The measurement system was affixed to the knee by adhering the sensor to the skin in alignment with the anterolateral ligament (ALL), allowing the lower part of the sensor (made of silicone) and the circuit board to be in direct contact with the knee's surface. It is important to note that the sensor should be attached without any prior stretching. To validate the system, an in vivo test was conducted on 10 healthy volunteers. The dorsiflexion of the ankle was set at 2 Nm using a torque meter to eliminate any rotational laxity in the ankle. A strain gauge sensor was affixed to the Gerdii's tubercle along the course of the anterolateral ligament, just beneath the lateral epicondyle of the thigh. In three successive measurements, the internal rotation of the foot and, consequently, the lower leg was quantified with a 2 Nm torque. The alteration in the stretch mark's length was then compared to the measured internal rotation angle using the static measuring device. A statistically significant difference between genders emerged in the internal rotation range of the knee (p = 0.003), with female participants displaying a greater range of rotation compared to their male counterparts. The polymer-based capacitive strain gauge exhibited consistent linearity across all measurements, remaining within the sensor's initial 20% strain range. The comparison between length change and the knee's internal rotation angle revealed a positive correlation (r = 1, p < 0.01). The current study shows that elastic polymer-based capacitive strain gauges are a reliable instrument for the internal rotation measurement of the knee. This will allow dynamic measurements in the future under many different settings. In addition, significant gender differences in the internal rotation angle were seen.

Isolated meniscus allograft transplantation with soft-tissue technique effectively reduces knee laxity in the presence of previous meniscectomy: In-vivo navigation of 18 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

Although meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is a well-established procedure with satisfactory clinical results, limited in vivo kinematic information exists on the effect of medial and lateral MAT performed in the clinical setting. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical effect of arthroscopic isolated medial and lateral MAT with a soft-tissue fixation on pre- and post-operative knee laxity using a surgical navigation system.

METHODS

18 consecutive patients undergoing MAT (8 medial, 10 lateral) were enrolled. A surgical navigation system was used to quantify the anterior-posterior displacement at 30 and 90 degrees of knee flexion (AP30 and AP90), the varus-valgus rotation at 0 and 30 degrees of knee flexion (VV0 and VV30) and the dynamic laxity on the pivot-shift test (PS), which was determined through the anterior displacement of the lateral tibial compartment (APlat) and posterior acceleration of the lateral tibial compartment during tibial reduction (ACC). Data from laxity before and after MAT were compared through paired t-test (p ​< ​0.05).

RESULTS

After medial MAT, there was a significant decrease in tibial translation of 3.1 ​mm (31%; p ​= ​0.001) for AP30 and 2.3 ​mm (27%; p ​= ​0.020) for AP90, a significant difference of 2.5° (50%; p ​= ​0.002) for VV0 and 1.7° (27%; p ​= ​0.012) for VV30. However, medial MAT did not determine any reduction in the PS kinematic data. Lateral MAT determined a significant decrease in the tibial translation of 2.5 ​mm (38%; p ​< ​0.001) for AP30 and 1.9 ​mm (34%; p ​= ​0.004) for AP90 as well as a significant difference of 3.4° (59%; p ​< ​0.001) for VV0 and of 1.7° (23%; p ​= ​0.011) for VV30. There was also a significant reduction of the PS of 4.4 ​mm (22%; p ​= ​0.028) for APlat and 384.8 ​mm/s2 (51%; p ​= ​0.005) for ACC.

CONCLUSION

MAT with soft-tissue fixation results in a significant laxity reduction in an in-vivo setting. Medial MAT improved knee kinematics by determining a significant reduction with particular emphasis on AP translation and VV manoeuvre. Conversely, Lateral MAT determined a massive reduction of the PS and a mild decrease of the AP translation and VV manoeuvre.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

Digital measurement of anterolateral knee laxity using strain sensors

PURPOSE

The ambition of the research group was to develop a sensor-based system that allowed the transfer of results with strain sensors applied to the knee joint. This system was to be validated in comparison to the current static mechanical measurement system. For this purpose, the internal rotation laxity of the knee joint was measured, as it is relevant for anterolateral knee laxity and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

This is a noninvasive measurement method using strain sensors which are applied to the skin in the course of the anterolateral ligament. The subjects were placed in supine position. First the left and then the right leg were clinically examined sequentially and documented by means of an examination form. 11 subjects aged 21 to 45 years, 5 women and 6 men were examined. Internal rotation of the lower leg was performed with a torque of 2 Nm at a knee flexion angle of 30°.

RESULTS

Comparison of correlation between length change and internal knee rotation angle showed a strong positive correlation (r = 1, p < 0.01). Whereas females showed a significant higher laxity vs. males (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that the capacitive strain sensors can be used for reproducible measurement of anterolateral knee laxity. In contrast to the previous static systems, a dynamic measurement will be possible by this method in the future.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral plasty restores anterior-posterior laxity in the case of concurrent partial medial meniscectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vivo knee laxity in the presence of a partial medial meniscectomy before and after a single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a lateral plasty (SBLP) and to compare it with the knee laxity after a single-bundle ACL reconstruction (SB).

METHODS

One-hundred and one patients with ACL tear were enrolled in the study and grouped according to the surgical technique and the meniscus treatment: regarding the SBLP technique (n = 55), 31 patients underwent isolated ACL reconstruction ("SBLP Isolated ACL Group"), while 24 patients underwent combined ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy ("SBLP ACL + MM Group"); regarding the SB technique (n = 46), 33 patients underwent isolated ACL reconstruction ("SB Isolated ACL Group"), while 13 patients underwent combined ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy ("SB ACL + MM Group"). Anterior-posterior clinical laxity at 30° (AP30) and 90° (AP90) of knee flexion was quantified before and after surgery through a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment.

RESULTS

In the ACL-deficient status, the antero-posterior laxity was significantly higher in the presence of a combined MM in both the AP30 and the AP90, with no differences between the two surgical techniques. After the ACL reconstruction, both AP30 and AP90 translations decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) compared to the ACL-deficient status. No differences were found for AP30 and AP90 between SBLP Isolated ACL and SBLP + MM groups, while a significantly higher AP90 translation was found for the SB + MM group compared to the SB Isolated ACL group. Moreover, the AP90 translation in the SB ACL + MM group was significantly higher than the one of the other three groups, i.e., SBLP ACL + MM, SB, and SBLP Isolated ACL group.

CONCLUSION

The ACL reconstruction with lateral plasty reduced the AP knee laxity caused by the medial meniscectomy in the context of an ACL surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Severe bicompartmental bone bruise is associated with rotatory instability in anterior cruciate ligament injury

PURPOSE

The presence and severity of bone bruise is more and more investigated in the non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury context. Recent studies have advocated a correlation between bone bruise and preoperative knee laxity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between bone bruise and preoperative rotatory knee laxity.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (29.1 ± 9.8 years) with MRI images at a maximum of 3 months after ACL injury (1.6 ± 0.8 months) were included. The bone bruise severity was evaluated according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scale for lateral femoral condyle, lateral tibial plateau, medial femoral condyle, and medial tibial plateau. The intraoperative rotational knee laxity was evaluated through a surgical navigation system in terms of internal-external rotation at 30° and 90° of knee flexion (IE30, IE90) and internal-external rotation and acceleration during pivot-shift test (PS IE, PS ACC). The KOOS score was also collected. The association between ICRS grade of bone bruise and rotational laxity or KOOS was investigated.

RESULTS

Significant correlation (p < 0.05) was found between the bone bruise severity on the medial tibial plateau and rotational laxity (IE90, PS IE, and PS ACC) and between the severity of bone bruise on femoral lateral condyle and KOOS-Symptoms sub-score. The presence of bone bruise on the medial tibial plateau was significantly associated with a lateral femoral notch sign > 2 mm (very strong odds ratio). No kinematical differences were found between none-to-deep and extensive-generalized lateral bone bruise, while higher IE30 and IE90 were found in extensive-generalized bicompartmental bone bruise than isolated extensive-generalized lateral bone bruise.

CONCLUSION

A severe bicompartmental bone bruise was related to higher rotatory instability in the intraoperative evaluation of ACL deficient knees. The severity of edema on the medial tibial plateau was directly correlated with higher intraoperative pivot shift, and the size of edema on the lateral femoral condyle was associated with lower preoperative clinical scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

The Lateral Femoral Notch Sign Is Correlated With Increased Rotatory Laxity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Pivot Shift Quantification With A Surgical Navigation System

BACKGROUND

The lateral femoral notch sign (LNS) is a bony impression on the lateral femoral condyle correlated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Its presence is associated with lateral meniscal injury and higher cartilage degradation on the lateral femoral condyle.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to investigate the effect of the presence and magnitude of LNS on rotatory instability. The hypothesis was that a positive LNS is correlated with a high-grade pivot shift (PS).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 90 consecutive patients with complete ACL tears between 2013 and 2017 underwent intraoperative kinematic evaluation with the surgical navigation system and were included in the present study. The same surgeon performed a standardized PS under anesthesia. The PS was quantified through the acceleration of the lateral compartment during tibial reduction (PS ACC) and the internal-external rotation (PS IE). Presence and depth of LNS were evaluated on sagittal magnetic resonance images (1.5-T).

RESULTS

In 47 patients, the LNS was absent; in 33, the LNS depth was between 1 mm and 2 mm; and in 10 patients, it was deeper than 2 mm. Patients with a notch deeper than 2 mm showed increased PS ACC and PS IE compared with the group without the LNS. However, no significant differences were present between the group with a notch between 1 and 2 mm and the patients without LNS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 2 mm was the most predictive cutoff value to identify the "high-grade rotatory instability" group, with an accuracy of 77.8% and 74.4% and a specificity of 95.5% and 93.9% referred to the PS ACC and PS IE, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a lateral LNS deeper than 2 mm could be used for the preoperative identification of patients with a high risk of increased rotatory instability.

Stress radiography at 30° of knee flexion is a reliable evaluation tool for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of stress radiography and determine the cutoff values for high-grade anterolateral rotatory laxity in complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees at different positions.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with complete ACL rupture (group 1) and 37 normal subjects (group 2) were prospectively enrolled. The amount of anterior translation in the medial (MM) and lateral (LL) distance compartments and the difference between them (LL-MM distance) were measured using stress radiography at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° positions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed for the presence of a high-grade (grade > 2) pivot shift.

RESULTS

The MM and LL distances in group 1 were significantly different at 30° and 45° positions (P < 0.05). The AUC of the MM (AUC, 0.903) and LL (AUC, 0.901) distances at the 30° position was significantly higher than that of the other positions (P = 0.000); however, the cutoff values were different to diagnose ACL injury (MM vs. LL, 3.1 mm vs. 5.4 mm). A 2.1-mm cutoff for the LL-MM distance showed 78.4% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for detecting the presence of a high-grade pivot shift (AUC = 0.905, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The cutoff values of stress radiography differed according to anatomical references and knee flexion positions. Stress radiography of a 2.1 mm difference in LL-MM distance at 30° of knee flexion can be a reliable method for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, diagnostic study.

The Contribution of Partial Meniscectomy to Preoperative Laxity and Laxity After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: In Vivo Kinematics With Navigation

BACKGROUND

Limited in vivo kinematic information exists on the effect of clinical-based partial medial and lateral meniscectomy in the context of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

In patients with ACL deficiency, partial medial meniscus removal increases the anteroposterior (AP) laxity with compared with those with intact menisci, while partial lateral meniscus removal increases dynamic laxity. In addition, greater postoperative laxity would be identified in patients with partial medial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 164 patients with ACL tears were included in the present study and divided into 4 groups according to the meniscus treatment they underwent: patients with partial lateral meniscectomy (LM group), patients with partial medial meniscectomy (MM group), patients with partial medial and lateral meniscectomy (MLM group), and patients with intact menisci who did not undergo any meniscus treatment (IM group). A further division in 2 new homogeneous groups was made based on the surgical technique: 46 had an isolated single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACL group), while 13 underwent a combined single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy (MM-ACL group). Standard clinical laxities (AP translation at 30° of knee flexion, AP translation at 90° of knee flexion) and pivot-shift (PS) tests were quantified before and after surgery by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment. The PS test was quantified through 3 different parameters: the anterior displacement of the lateral tibial compartment (lateral AP); the posterior acceleration of the lateral AP during tibial reduction (posterior acceleration); and finally, the area included by the lateral AP translation with respect to the flexion/extension angle (area).

RESULTS

In the ACL-deficient status, the MM group showed a significantly greater tibial translation compared with the IM group (P < .0001 for AP displacement at 30° [AP30] and 90° [AP90] of flexion) and the LM group (P = .002 for AP30 and P < .0001 for AP90). In the PS test, the area of LM group was significantly larger (57%; P = .0175) than the one of the IM group. After ACL reconstruction, AP translation at 30° was restored, while the AP90 remained significantly greater at 1.3 mm (P = .0262) in the MM-ACL group compared with those with intact menisci.

CONCLUSION

Before ACL reconstruction, partial medial meniscectomy increased AP laxity at 30° and 90° and lateral meniscectomy increased dynamic PS laxity with respect to intact menisci. Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction decreased laxities, but a residual anterior translation of 1.3 mm at 90° remained in patients with partial medial meniscectomy, with respect to those with intact menisci.

ACL reconstruction with lateral plasty reduces translational and rotatory laxity compared to anatomical single bundle and non-anatomical double bundle surgery: An in vivo kinematic evaluation with navigation system

BACKGROUND

Significantly better stability may be achieved with a Single Bundle Lateral Plasty (SBLP) reconstruction compared with the Single Bundle (SB) and Double Bundle (DB) procedures.

METHODS

The study included 42 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. Patients were randomly selected for one of the following surgical procedure defining three study groups: Single-Bundle-Lateral-Plasty, Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle procedures. Laxity evaluation was performed with an intraoperative navigation system. Lachman test (AP30), Drawer test (AP90), Varus-Valgus stress test at 0° and 30° knee flexion (VV0, VV30), Internal-External rotation (IE30, IE90), and pivot shift (PS) test are the clinical test executed for the laxity evaluation. Laxity reduction was defined as the difference between laxity before the fixation of the graft used for the reconstruction and the laxity just after its fixation.

FINDINGS

For all the analyzed surgical techniques, the pre-reconstruction laxity values were statistically higher (P < 0.05) than the post-reconstruction values for all the analyzed tests. The analysis of the Drawer test and Internal-External rotation at 30° and 90° of knee flexion, highlighted a significant difference at time zero after surgery among the three study groups. The results showed that the SBLP technique had the highest reduction values compared to SB (P_IE90 = 0.001) and DB (P_AP90 = 0.012; P_IE30 = 0.021; P_IE90 = 0.003) techniques.

INTERPRETATION

SBLP technique showed significantly superior results in terms of antero-posterior and internal-external laxity reduction at time-zero after ACL reconstruction.

The biomechanical role of meniscal allograft transplantation and preliminary in-vivo kinematic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) is a surgical procedure performed in patients complaining post-meniscectomy syndrome. Although the effectiveness of MAT on knee stability has been already demonstrated in cadaveric studies, its biomechanical role has been poorly evaluated in-vivo.

METHODS

A narrative review of the biomechanical effect of meniscectomy and MAT was performed. Furthermore, two cases were presented, of one patient who underwent Medial MAT and Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and one who underwent Lateral MAT. During the surgery, knee laxity was evaluated using a surgical navigation system.

RESULTS

AP laxity and IE rotation were reduced of 25% to 50% at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion after MAT transplantation.

DISCUSSION

In both cases, almost all the tests performed showed a reduction of knee laxity after meniscus transplant, when compared with pre-operative knee laxity. This assessment confirms the insights of previous in-vitro studies and underline a crucial role of MAT in knee biomechanics.

Greater Laxity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee Carries a Higher Risk of Postreconstruction Pivot Shift: Intraoperative Measurements With a Navigation System

BACKGROUND

The presence of pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is correlated with worse clinical outcomes. An orthopaedic navigation system is a useful tool for quantifying laxity in the ACL-deficient knee.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between preoperative knee laxity measured by a navigation system and postoperative pivot shift (PPS) after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

One hundred patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction (62 hamstring tendon grafts, 38 patellar tendon grafts) were grouped according to the presence or absence of pivot shift at the 2-year follow-up, and the groups were compared retrospectively. Before surgery, knee laxity was assessed with a navigation system to quantify posterior tibial reduction (PTR) during pivot-shift tests and anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Lachman tests. PTR and ATT cutoff values were determined by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative PTR and ATT were significantly larger for patients with PPS (PPS-positive group) than those without (PPS-negative group). In the ROC analysis, the PTR had an area under the curve of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.763-0.979; P < .0001) for predicting a PPS; this was larger than that obtained for the ATT, which had an area under the curve of 0.825 (95% CI, 0.705-0.946; P = .001). Because the ROC curve of the ATT had 2 peaks, the ATT alone was not a suitable predictor for PPS. Based on the ROC curve, the optimal PTR cutoff value was 7 mm, with 88.9% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity for PPS (adjusted odds ratio = 19.7; 95% CI, 2.1-187.9; P = .009). Setting the cutoff value as a combination of the PTR (≧7 mm) and ATT (≧12 mm) improved the specificity (88.9% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity; adjusted odds ratio = 149.8; 95% CI, 5.9-3822.7; P = .002) over that with the PTR alone.

CONCLUSION

ACL injuries in knees with a large PTR had a higher risk of PPS. When reconstructing the ACL in a knee with a high degree of laxity, surgeons may need to adopt strategies to prevent PPS.

Correlation between quantitative pivot shift and generalized joint laxity: a prospective multicenter study of ACL ruptures

PURPOSE

To investigate whether an increased magnitude of quantitative rotatory knee laxity is associated with a greater level of generalized joint laxity in ACL-injured and contralateral knees.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled across four international centers to undergo anatomic ACL reconstruction. Rotatory knee laxity was evaluated preoperatively, both in the awake state and under anesthesia, using the standardized pivot shift test. Two devices were used to quantify rotatory knee laxity; an inertial sensor, measuring the joint acceleration, and an image analysis system, measuring the lateral compartment translation of the tibia. The presence of generalized joint laxity was determined using the Beighton Hypermobility Score. The correlation between the level of generalized joint laxity and the magnitude of rotatory knee laxity was calculated for both the involved knee and the non-involved knee. Further, patients were dichotomized into low (0-4) or high (5-9) Beighton Score groups. Alpha was set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients had complete datasets, 83 and 13 in the low and high Beighton Score groups respectively. In anesthetized patients, there was a significant correlation between the degree of Beighton Score and quantitative pivot shift when analyzing the non-involved knee using the image analysis system (r = 0.235, p < 0.05). When analyzing the same knee, multivariate analysis adjusted for meniscal injury, age and gender revealed an increased odds ratio for patients with increased lateral compartment translation to be part of the high Beighton Score group (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.17, p < 0.05). No other correlation was significant. When analyzing the dichotomized subgroups, no significant correlations could be established.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study suggest that there is a weak correlation between generalized joint laxity and the contralateral healthy knee, indicating increased rotatory knee laxity in these patients. Generalized joint laxity does not appear to correlate with rotatory knee laxity in ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study; level of evidence, 2.

Experimental validation of the GNRB® for measuring anterior tibial translation

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to validate the technique used to measure anterior tibial translation in cadaver knees using the GNRB^® device by comparing it with the gold standard, the OrthoPilot^® navigation system.

HYPOTHESIS

Simultaneous measurement of anterior tibial translation by the GNRB^® and the OrthoPilot^® in the chosen experimental conditions will result in significant differences between devices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five fresh frozen cadavers were used. The knee was placed in 20° flexion. Four calibrated posterior-anterior forces (134N to 250N) were applied. For each applied force, the anterior tibial translation was measured simultaneously by both devices. Two conditions were analyzed: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) intact and ACL transected. The primary criterion was anterior tibial translation at 250N. The measurements were compared using a paired Student's t-test and the correlation coefficient was calculated. Agreement between the two methods was determined using Bland-Altman plots. Consistency of the measurements was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

For all applied forces and ligament conditions, the mean difference between the GNRB^® and the navigation system was 0.1±1.7mm (n.s). Out of the 80 measurements taken, the difference between devices was less than ±2mm in 66 cases (82%). There was a strong correlation, good agreement and high consistency between the two measurement methods.

DISCUSSION

The differences between the measurements taken by the GNRB^® and the navigation system were small and likely have no clinical impact. We recommend using the GNRB^® to evaluate anterior knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II controlled laboratory study.

Current use of navigation system in ACL surgery: a historical review

PURPOSE

The present review aims to analyse the available literature regarding the use of navigation systems in ACL reconstructive surgery underling the evolution during the years.

METHODS

A research of indexed scientific papers was performed on PubMed and Cochrane Library database. The research was performed in December 2015 with no publication year restriction. Only English-written papers and related to the terms ACL, NAVIGATION, CAOS and CAS were considered. Two reviewers independently selected only those manuscripts that presented at least the application of navigation system for ACL reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six of 394 articles were finally selected. In this analysis, it was possible to review the main uses of navigation system in ACL surgery including tunnel positioning for primary and revision surgery and kinematic assessment of knee laxity before and after different surgical procedures. In the early years, until 2006, navigation system was mainly used to improve tunnel positioning, but since the last decade, this tool has been principally used for kinematics evaluation. Increased accuracy of tunnel placement was observed using navigation surgery, especially, regarding femoral, 42 of 146 articles used navigation to guide tunnel positioning. During the following years, 82 of 146 articles have used navigation system to evaluate intraoperative knee kinematic. In particular, the importance of controlling rotatory laxity to achieve better surgical outcomes has been underlined.

CONLUSIONS

Several applications have been described and despite the contribution of navigation systems, its potential uses and theoretical advantages, there are still controversies about its clinical benefit. The present papers summarize the most relevant studies that have used navigation system in ACL reconstruction. In particular, the analysis identified four main applications of the navigation systems during ACL reconstructive surgery have been identified: (1) technical assistance for tunnel placement; (2) improvement in knowledge of the kinematic behaviour of ACL and other structures; (3) comparison of effectiveness of different surgical techniques in controlling laxities; (4) navigation system performance to improve the outcomes of ACL reconstruction and cost-effectiveness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Does meniscus removal affect ACL-deficient knee laxity? An in vivo study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to determine, in vivo, the effect of different types of meniscectomy on an ACL-deficient knee.

METHODS

Using a computer-assisted navigation system, 56 consecutive patients (45 men and 11 women) were subjected to a biomechanical testing with Lachman test (AP30), drawer test (AP90), internal/external rotation test, varus/valgus rotation test and pivot-shift test. The patients were divided into three groups according to the status of the medial meniscus. Group BH, 8 patients with bucket-handle tear of medial meniscus underwent a subtotal meniscectomy; Group PHB, 19 patients with posterior horn body of medial meniscus tear underwent a partial meniscectomy; and Group CG with isolated ACL rupture, as a control group, with 29 patients.

RESULTS

A significant difference in anterior tibial translation was seen at 30 grades and in 90 grades between BH and PHB groups compared to the CG. In response to pivot-shift test, no significant differences in terms of AREA and POSTERIOR ACC were found among the three groups (n.s). Concerning the anterior displacement of the pivot shift a statistically significant differences among the three tested groups was found.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that meniscal defects significantly affect the kinematics of an ACL-deficient knee in terms of anterior tibial translation under static and dynamic testing.

Objective measures on knee instability: dynamic tests: a review of devices for assessment of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test

Current reconstructive methods used after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury do not entirely restore native knee kinematics. Evaluation of dynamic knee laxity is important to accurately diagnose ACL deficiency, to evaluate reconstructive techniques, and to construct treatment algorithms for patients with ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to present recent progress in evaluation of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test. A thorough electronic search was performed and relevant studies were assessed. Certain dynamic knee laxity measurement methods have been present for over 10 years (Navigation system, Electromagnetic sensor system) while other methods (Inertial sensor, Image analysis system) have been introduced recently. Methods to evaluate dynamic knee laxity through the pivot shift test are already potent. However, further refinement is warranted. In addition, to correctly quantify the pivot shift test, the involved forces need to be controlled through either standardization or mechanization of the pivot shift test.

Computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Four generations of development and usage

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature about the contribution of navigation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The evolution of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for ACL reconstruction has undergone several steps. These steps were divided into 4 subsequent developments: (1) positioning of ACL graft placement; (2) laxity measurement of ACL reconstruction (quality control); (3) kinematic evaluation during ACL reconstruction (navigated pivot shift); (4) case-specific individual ACL reconstruction with adjustments and additional reconstruction options. CAS has shown to improve femoral tunnel positioning, even if clinical outcomes do not improve results of manual techniques. CAS technology has helped researchers better understand the effects of different ACL reconstruction techniques and bundles replacements on joint laxity and to describe tunnel positioning in relation to native ACL insertion. CAS in ACL surgery can improve results at time zero and can improve knowledge in this field.

Stability Outcomes following Computer-Assisted ACL Reconstruction

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative prereconstruction stability measurements and/or patient characteristics were associated with final knee stability after computer-assisted ACL reconstruction. Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent computer-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Prereconstruction intraoperative stability measurements were correlated with patient characteristics and postreconstruction stability measurements. 143 patients were included (87 male and 56 female). Average age was 29.8 years (SD ± 11.8). Results. Females were found to have significantly more pre- and postreconstruction internal rotation than males (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, resp.). Patients with additional intra-articular injuries demonstrated more prereconstruction anterior instability than patients with isolated ACL tears (P < 0.001). After reconstruction, these patients also had higher residual anterior translation (P = 0.01). Among all patients with ACL reconstructions, the percent of correction of anterior translation was found to be significantly higher than the percent of correction for internal or external rotation (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Anterior translation was corrected the most using a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Females had higher pre- and postoperative internal rotation. Patients with additional injuries had greater original anterior translation and less operative correction of anterior translation compared to patients with isolated ACL tears.

In vivo kinematic evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the functional role of the posterolateral (PL) bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vivo function of the PL and anteromedial (AM) bundles of the ACL during anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction for acute, isolated ACL tears utilizing a computer navigation system to track intraoperative knee kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with acute, isolated ACL tears who underwent anatomic DB ACL reconstruction formed the sample for this study. During surgery, knees were examined by a clinician preoperatively, after fixation of the PL bundle, and after fixation of both the PL and AM bundles. An image-free computer navigation system with custom-made software recorded the data during kinematic tests. The examination consisted of the Lachman and anterior drawer tests, internal-external rotation at 30° of knee flexion, and varus-valgus rotation at 30° of knee flexion. Paired Wilcoxon tests were performed to evaluate the effects of each bundle. The comparisons included ACL-deficient to PL bundle-reconstructed knees, ACL-deficient to DB ACL-reconstructed knees, and PL bundle-reconstructed to DB ACL-reconstructed knees. Significance was set at P < .017 to account for the multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Fixation of the PL bundle significantly improved knee laxity during the Lachman and anterior drawer tests as well as internal-external rotation at 30° of knee flexion (P < .017 for all tests). The addition of the AM bundle further improved knee laxity during the Lachman and anterior drawer tests compared with PL bundle fixation as well as during varus-valgus rotation at 30° of knee flexion compared with ACL-deficient knees (P < .017 for all tests).

CONCLUSION

This in vivo study demonstrates that isolated PL bundle reconstruction improves laxity in an ACL-deficient knee and that the addition of the AM bundle improves laxity parameters further.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Abnormal knee kinematics is known to be linked to the earlier onset of osteoarthritis and lower rates of return to sport. This study suggests that both the AM and PL bundles are important to stabilize ACL-deficient knees.

Anatomic and nonanatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo kinematic analysis

BACKGROUND

There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P < .050). No other significant differences in laxity or pivot-shift values were noted. The mean surgical time for ADB reconstruction was significantly higher than that for NABD reconstruction (62 ± 13 and 43 ± 10 minutes, respectively; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Results showed a greater anterior-posterior translation of both compartments during the rotational passive laxity test in the ADB reconstruction group or overconstraint caused by the NADB technique. The 2 analyzed double-bundle ACL reconstructions did not show any significant quantitative difference in isolated anterior-posterior laxity and pivot-shift phenomenon at time zero.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Nonanatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction can control anterior-posterior laxity and the pivot-shift phenomenon as well as ABD ACL reconstruction.

AM bundle controls the anterior-posterior and rotational stability to a greater extent than the PL bundle - a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of both bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on knee stability, anterior-posterior translation (APT) and internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation in cadaveric knees using a computer navigation system.

METHODS

The APT, IR, and ER of the knees were recorded in the intact condition, the anterolateral bundle (AM) or the posterolateral bundle (PL) deficit condition and in the ACL-deficient condition. The KT-1000 arthrometer was used for APT evaluation. The measurement of rotational movements was done using a rollimeter. All tests were performed at 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

At 30° of flexion: In the intact knee APT was 5.8mm, IR 12.1°, ER 10.1°. After the AM was cut, the APT increased to 9.1mm, IR to 13.9° and ER to 12.6°. After the PL was cut, the APT was 6.4mm, IR 13.1° and ER 10.6°. After the AM and PL were cut, the APT was 10.8mm, IR 15.7° and the ER was 12.9° on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The AM has a greater impact on the APT than the PL in all knee joint flexion angles. The PL does not resist the rotational stability more than the AM. The rotational stability is better controlled by both bundles of ACL as compared to one bundle of the ACL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study acknowledges the fact that the both bundles of the ACL are importants for AP and rotational stability of the knee joint.

Anterior knee laxity measurement using stress radiographs and the GNRB(®) system versus intraoperative navigation

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee laxity measurement serves both to diagnose and to evaluate the severity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) damage.

HYPOTHESIS

We tested the hypothesis that anterior laxity measurements of ACL-deficient knees obtained using the GNRB(®) system and stress radiographs differed from each other and from intraoperative navigation measurement taken as the reference standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with chronic ACL deficiency underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Anterior knee laxity was measured preoperatively using the GNRB(®) system without anaesthesia and anterior-drawer stress radiographs under anaesthesia then intraoperatively using a non-image-based navigation system.

RESULTS

The three measurements differed significantly (P=0.05). A systematic measurement error of -3.7 mm occurred for both preoperative measurements versus the reference standard. No significant difference was found between the two preoperative measurements.

DISCUSSION

The GNRB(®) system should be preferred over stress radiographs, as reliability is similar but no radiation exposure is required. Both preoperative measurement methods underestimate anterior laxity as measured intraoperatively using the navigation system. This systematic bias may be relevant to treatment decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, development of a diagnostic criterion in consecutive patients versus a validated reference standard.

Applications of computer navigation in sports medicine knee surgery: an evidence-based review

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been investigated in a number of sports medicine procedures in the knee. Current barriers to its widespread introduction include increased costs, duration, and invasiveness of surgery. Randomized trials on the use of CAS in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit. Data on CAS use in high tibial osteotomy are more promising; however, long-term studies are lacking. CAS has a number of research applications in knee ligament surgery, and studies continue to explore its use in the treatment of osteochondral lesions. This article reviews the applications of CAS in sports medicine knee surgery and summarizes current literature on clinical outcomes.

Do pre-operative knee laxity values influence post-operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

The objective of this study was to verify whether pre-reconstruction laxity condition effects post-reconstruction outcome. A total of 100 patients who underwent navigated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction were included in the study and knee laxity analysed retrospectively. The knee was assessed in six different laxity tests before and after ACL reconstruction, namely antero-posterior (AP) and internal-external (IE) at 30° and 90°, and varus-valgus (VV) rotations at 0° and 30° of flexion. For each test, the least square (LS) fitting line based on pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity value was calculated. To what degree the post-operative laxity value is explainable by the corresponding pre-operative condition was evaluated by the LS line slope. Post-operatively, for each single patient, the grade of laxity decreased at any evaluated test. The strongest influence of pre-operative-to-post-operative laxity values was found during IE30 and IE90 tests. While AP30 and VV0 tests seem to be those in which the post-reconstruction laxity was barely affected by the pre-surgery condition. The analysis of the global laxity reduction confirms the previous results. Following this hypothesis, our study remarks on the importance of combined lesions to secondary restraints and the importance of fully understanding the residual laxity to optimize the surgical technique.

Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the kinematics changes of the knee after cutting of the ACL with or without injury of the anterolateral structures.

METHODS

In this study, the role of the ACL and one of the secondary restraints in controlling knee stability using a navigation system was evaluated. The kinematics of the knee was evaluated in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after dissection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after dissection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the lateral capsular ligament (LCL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°.

RESULTS

Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° (P = 0.01), but does not increase rotation of the knee. Cutting the LCL increased anterior translation at 60° (P = 0.04) and rotation at 30°, 45°, and 60° (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the testing conditions of this study, the PL bundle does not affect anterior translation and rotation of the knee; the AM bundle is the primary restraint of the anterior translation but does not affect rotation of the knee while the lesion of the LCL increases tibial rotation and could be related to the pivot shift phenomenon, so it is more correct and biomechanical valid to assess and repair the associated lesion of the antero-lateral structure of the knee at the time of ACL surgery.

ACCURACY CHARACTERIZATION OF AN INTEGRATED OPTICAL-BASED METHOD FOR LOADS MEASUREMENT IN COMPUTER AIDED SURGERY

Generally in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury assessment specific laxity tests (i.e., Lachman, drawer tests) are clinically performed to evaluate the presence of ligamentous lesion. At present these tests are qualitatively evaluated by the surgeon and some quantitative measurements can be performed only for Lachman/drawer tests by means of dedicated devices. This study aimed to characterize the accuracy of a novel integrated optical-based method that can be used both in intra-operative and in office assessment of ACL injuries; in particular this technology was addressed to measure the loads/torques applied during clinical laxity tests, extending the current possible quantitative evaluations. The system, based on a commercial optical localizer and common springs, was spatially characterized in order to verify displacement/rotation and corresponding applied load/torque measurements. Evaluated limits of agreement between measured and applied loads were from –0.541 to 1.781 N, with a bias of 0.621 N (P = 0.05) in a dedicated clinical-like setup. This approach reported an excellent accuracy in load measurements, showing its possible integration in computer-aided surgery (CAS).

The relationship of anterior and rotatory laxity between surgical navigation and clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Recently, a computer-assisted navigation system has been used for the quantitative evaluation not only of anterior-posterior (AP) laxity but also rotational laxity of the tibia intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate how intraoperative AP or rotational laxities measured by the navigation system could correlate with postoperative AP and rotational laxities of the patients.

METHODS

125 patients who underwent primary isolated anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction or augmentation using multistranded autologous hamstring tendons were included in the study after a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Clinically, absolute value and side-to-side difference (SSD) of AP translation of the tibia were measured by KT-2000 preoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative measurement of AP translation of the tibia and total range of tibial rotation of the ACL-injured knee were carried out using the computer-assisted navigation system. We have investigated the relationship between intraoperative measurements using the navigation system and AP laxity measurements using the KT-2000 knee arthrometer as well as rotational laxity measurements using the manual pivot shift test.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between the SSD of preoperative AP translation of the tibia measured by KT-2000 arthrometer and the reduction in AP laxity following ACL reconstruction measured by the navigation system. However, we found no significant correlation between the reduction in AP laxity measured by the navigation system and the SSD of AP translation of the tibia measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer at final follow-up. Postoperatively, eight patients had a positive pivot shift test. Using the navigation system pre- and post-ACL reconstruction, these patients could not be identified by high absolute values for AP laxity nor rotational laxity.

CONCLUSION

Although AP and rotational laxities vary largely among the patients, and AP and rotational stabilization are successfully achieved immediately after ACL reconstruction, intraoperative AP and rotational laxity measured by the navigation system did not influence the postoperative AP and rotational laxities after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of anterior and rotatory laxity using navigation between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess the anterior tibial translation and rotational kinematics of the knee joint as well as the clinical outcome after single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Forty-two patients randomly underwent single-bundle (Group SB, n = 21) or double-bundle (Group DB, n = 21) ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts. Anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity were measured prior to and after fixation of the graft during reconstruction under the guidance of a navigation system. Clinical outcome measurements included the evaluation of the joint stability and functional status.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation and rotatory laxity were improved significantly at all degrees of knee flexion in both groups. The postoperative total rotation (sum of internal and external rotation) at 30° and 60° (26.6° vs. 24.0°; 28.7° vs. 25.1°) as well as postoperative change in external rotation at 60° (-1.4° vs. -4.6°), and a change in total rotation at 30° and 60° (-7.0° vs. -11.5°; -6.1° vs. -8.9°) differed between the two groups, with better stability in the DB group. At 2 years follow-up, IKDC subjective satisfaction score was significantly different between two groups (70.9 vs. 79.6), while manual and instrumented laxity, pivot shift tests, modified Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, thigh muscle strengths were not different. Correlation analysis showed little correlations between anterior laxity tests at follow-up, and the kinematic variables measured by navigation during surgery while pivot shift test, IKDC subjective satisfaction score, modified Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score were mainly correlated with navigation-measured rotations in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The kinematic tests in this study found evidence suggesting that the DB ACL reconstruction improved rotatory laxity better than the SB ACL reconstruction at 30° and 60° of flexion, but there was no difference in functional outcome at 2 years follow-up between SB and DB groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

Reproducibility of an optical measurement system for the clinical evaluation of active knee rotation in weight-bearing, healthy subjects

INTRODUCTION

A knee is typically evaluated passively by a clinician during an office visit, without using dedicated measurement tools. When the knee is evaluated with the patient standing and actively participating in the movement, the results will differ than when the knee is passively moved through its range-of-motion by the surgeon. If a precise measurement system was available, it could provide additional information to the clinician during this evaluation.

HYPOTHESIS

The goal of this study was to verify the reproducibility of a fast, flexible optical measurement system to measure rotational knee laxity during weight-bearing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two passive reflective targets were placed on the legs of 11 subjects to monitor femur and tibia displacements in three dimensions. Subjects performed internal and external rotation movements with the knee extended or flexed 30°. During each movement, seven variables were measured: internal rotation, external rotation and overall laxity in extension and 30° flexion, along with neutral rotation value in 30° flexion. Measurement accuracy was also assessed and the right and left knees were compared. Reproducibility was assessed over two measurements sessions.

RESULTS

The calculated intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for reproducibility was above 0.9 for five of the seven variables measured. The calculated ICC for the right/left comparison was above 0.75 for five of the seven variables measured.

DISCUSSION

These results confirmed that the proposed system provides reproducible measurements. Our right/left comparison results were consistent with the published literature. This system is fast, reproducible and flexible, which makes it suitable for assessing various weight-bearing movements during clinical evaluations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, experimental study.

Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices

PURPOSE

Studies have reported that knee kinematics and rotational laxity are not restored to native levels following traditional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This has led to the development of anatomic ACL reconstruction, which aims to restore native knee kinematics and long-term knee health by replicating normal anatomy as much as possible. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of current dynamic knee laxity measurement devices with the purpose of investigating the significance of dynamic laxity measurement of the knee. Gait analysis is not included.

METHODS

The subject was discussed with experts in the field in order to perform a level V review. MEDLINE was searched according to the discussions for relevant articles using multiple different search terms. All found abstracts were read and scanned for relevance to the subject. The reference lists of the relevant articles were searched for additional articles related to the subject.

RESULTS

There are a variety of techniques reported to measure dynamic laxity of the knee. Technical development of methods is one important part toward better understanding of knee kinematics. Validation of devices has shown to be difficult due to the lack of gold standard. Different studies use various methods to examine different components of dynamic laxity, which makes comparisons between studies challenging.

CONCLUSION

Several devices can be used to evaluate dynamic laxity of the knee. At the present time, the devices are continuously under development. Future implementation should include primary basic research, including validation and reliability testing, as well as part of individualized surgery and clinical follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level V.

Rotatory knee laxity tests and the pivot shift as tools for ACL treatment algorithm

The goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery is to eliminate the pivot shift phenomenon. Different injury mechanisms and injury patterns may lead to specific knee laxity patterns. Computer navigation is helpful for the surgeon during examination under anesthesia. Surgical treatment may have to be altered if high-grade laxity is detected preoperatively for example by utilizing a computer navigation that is a helpful adjunct for surgeons during examination under anesthesia. A typical case for revision ACL reconstruction is presented. This article describes several techniques of laxity assessments. Based on the type and degree of pathologic laxity, a treatment algorithm has been developed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an in vivo quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL reconstructions

PURPOSE

Combinations of intra- and extra-articular procedures have been proposed for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the aim of achieving an optimal control of translational and rotational knee laxities. Recently, the need for better reproducing the structural and functional behavior of the native anterior cruciate ligament led to the definition of anatomic double-bundle surgical approach. This study aimed to quantitatively verify whether the in vivo static and dynamic behavior obtained using over-the-top single-bundle with extra-articular tenodesis reconstruction was comparable to the results achieved by anatomic double-bundle approach.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive patients, with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury, were included in the study. Standard clinical laxities and pivot-shift test were quantified before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacements of medial and lateral compartment during stress tests were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Single-bundle with extra-articular tenodesis approach presented statistically better laxity reduction in varus/valgus stress test at full extension and in internal/external rotation at 90° of flexion; lateral plasty controlled better the lateral compartment during drawer test and varus/valgus stress test both at 0° and 30° of flexion and both the compartments during internal/external rotation at 90° of flexion. On the other hand, pivot-shift phenomenon was better controlled by anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the reconstructions worked similarly for static knee laxity. The extra-articular procedure played an important role in better constraining the displacement of lateral tibial compartment, whereas the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction better restored the dynamic behavior of knee joint highlighted under pivot-shift stress test.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

Does chronic medial collateral ligament laxity influence the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a prospective evaluation with a minimum three-year follow-up

We have shown in a previous study that patients with combined lesions of the anterior cruciate (ACL) and medial collateral ligaments (MCL) had similar anteroposterior (AP) but greater valgus laxity at 30° after reconstruction of the ACL when compared with patients who had undergone reconstruction of an isolated ACL injury. The present study investigated the same cohort of patients after a minimum of three years to evaluate whether the residual valgus laxity led to a poorer clinical outcome. Each patient had undergone an arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. In the combined ACL/MCL injury group, the grade II medial collateral ligament injury was not treated. At follow-up, AP laxity was measured using a KT-2000 arthrometer, while valgus laxity was evaluated with Telos valgus stress radiographs and compared with the uninjured knee. We evaluated clinical outcome scores, muscle girth and time to return to activities for the two groups. Valgus stress radiographs showed statistically significant greater mean medial joint opening in the reconstructed compared with the uninjured knees (1.7 mm (SD 0.9) versus 0.9 mm (SD 0.7), respectively, p = 0.013), while no statistically significant difference was found between the AP laxity and the other clinical parameters. Our results show that the residual valgus laxity does not affect AP laxity significantly at a minimum follow up of three years, suggesting that no additional surgical procedure is needed for the medial collateral ligament in combined lesions.

Validation of a measurement device for instrumented quantification of anterior translation and rotational assessment of the knee

PURPOSE

A test setup for clinical use in the awake and non-anesthetized patient measuring anteroposterior translation and rotation of the knee joint is the subject of validation.

METHODS

A measuring device featuring fixation of the foot at 30° of knee flexion with varus/valgus stress posts for the knee was developed. Tibial rotation (external/internal) was imposed with a torque of 2 Nm on the footrest with the ankle locked in dorsiflexion. Anterior translation of the tibia in relation to the femur was measured with a commercially available arthrometer. Measurements were performed in a neutral position, internal rotation, and external rotation. Intrarater and inter-rater reliability was validated in 10 healthy volunteers (Cronbach α). We examined 10 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, as well as 10 patients with ACL rupture plus medial instability and 10 patients with additional lateral instability. Side-to-side differences were used for calculation.

RESULTS

Comparison of healthy volunteers and subjects with isolated ACL rupture showed significant differences: internal rotation, 0.79 mm and 2.46 mm, respectively (P = .001); neutral position, 0.4 mm and 3.35 mm, respectively (P < .0001); and external rotation, 0.29 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively (P = .003). Significant differences (P = .008) were found between isolated ACL rupture and ACL rupture plus medial instability by use of the ratio of anterior translation in external rotation versus the neutral position. Inter-rater reliability was 0.948 in 10 healthy volunteers and 0.981 in 10 subjects with unilateral ACL rupture. Intrarater reliability in the volunteers was 0.829.

CONCLUSIONS

By use of the developed measurement device, the "Laxitester" (ORTEMA Sport Protection, Markgroeningen, Germany), objective differentiation between isolated ACL rupture and ACL rupture plus additional medial instability is possible. Values for anterior translation are reliable and reproducible by different examiners and by the same examiner at different times.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The Laxitester allows objectification of medial instability in combination with ACL injuries and provides a reference regarding the need for additional medial stabilization. Compared with the isolated measurement of anteroposterior translation, knee instability can be assessed in a more differentiated manner.

Comparison between clinical grading and navigation data of knee laxity in ACL-deficient knees

Background

The latest version of the navigation system for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has the supplementary ability to assess knee stability before and after ACL reconstruction. In this study, we compared navigation data between clinical grades in ACL-deficient knees and also analyzed correlation between clinical grading and navigation data.

Methods

150 ACL deficient knees that received primary ACL reconstruction using an image-free navigation system were included. For clinical evaluation, the Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift tests were performed under general anesthesia and were graded by an examiner. For the assessment of knee stability using the navigation system, manual tests were performed again before ACL reconstruction. Navigation data were recorded as anteroposterior (AP) displacement of the tibia for the Lachman and anterior drawer tests, and both AP displacement and tibial rotation for the pivot shift test.

Results

Navigation data of each clinical grade were as follows; Lachman test grade 1+: 10.0 mm, grade 2+: 13.2 ± 3.1 mm, grade 3+: 14.5 ± 3.3 mm, anterior drawer test grade 1+: 6.8 ± 1.4 mm, grade 2+: 7.4 ± 1.8 mm, grade 3+: 9.1 ± 2.3 mm, pivot shift test grade 1+: 3.9 ± 1.8 mm/21.5° ± 7.8°, grade 2+: 4.8 ± 2.1 mm/21.8° ± 7.1°, and grade 3+: 6.0 ± 3.2 mm/21.1° ± 7.1°. There were positive correlations between clinical grading and AP displacement in the Lachman, and anterior drawer tests. Although positive correlations between clinical grading and AP displacement in pivot shift test were found, there were no correlations between clinical grading and tibial rotation in pivot shift test.

Conclusions

In response to AP force, the navigation system can provide the surgeon with correct objective data for knee laxity in ACL deficient knees. During the pivot shift test, physicians may grade according to the displacement of the tibia, rather than rotation.

Navigated knee kinematics after tear of the ACL and its secondary restraints: preliminary results

In this study we evaluated the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its secondary restraint in controlling knee stability using a navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the knee in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after transection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after transection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the anterolateral femorotibial ligament (ALFTL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 6 knees in whole fresh-frozen human cadavers by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° of flexion (P=.01), but does not increase rotation of the knee. Cutting the ALFTL increased anterior translation at 60° of flexion (P=.04) and rotation at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion (P=.03). The PL bundle does not affect anterior translation and rotation of the knee. The AM bundle is the primary restraint of the anterior translation but does not affect rotation of the knee. The lateral compartment becomes the primary restraint of rotation after ACL cut. The primary kinematic effect of an ACL injury is an increase in anterior tibial translation, but there is no significant change in maximum internal or external rotation. The lesion of the ALFTL increases tibial rotation and could be correlated to the pivot shift phenomenon.

Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees and contralateral stable knees by use of intraoperative navigation.

METHODS

Five patients with ipsilateral ACL-deficient knees with contralateral stable knees without any ligament injuries were included in this study. Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity during anterior drawer force applied manually and range of tibial rotation and AP knee laxity during internal and external rotational torque applied manually in both the ACL-deficient knee and the contralateral stable knee were measured by use of a navigation system from 15 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. After the temporary fixation of the posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle (AMB), or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction, knee laxity was measured again and compared with that of the stable knee.

RESULTS

The mean laxities for PLB reconstruction were significantly greater than those of the contralateral stable knee at more than 75 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). The mean laxities for AMB or DB reconstruction were not significantly different from those of the contralateral stable knee at all knee flexion angles. Those for AMB reconstruction were within +1.6 mm and those for DB reconstruction were within -2.0 mm of those of the contralateral stable knee. The mean rotations for all reconstructions were significantly less than those of the contralateral stable knee at less than 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

DB and AMB reconstructions could restore knee laxity closer to the level of the contralateral stable knee. Because normal knee laxity is different in each individual, evaluation of contralateral stable knee laxity during ACL reconstruction surgery would be helpful for restoration to the level of the specific preinjury knee laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis

Anterior translation of the lateral compartment was hypothesized to correlate with the clinical grade of a pivot shift maneuver. Using a computer-assisted navigation system, this hypothesis was tested by recording the maximum anterior tibial translation in the medial and lateral compartment as well as the arc of rotation during the pivot shift maneuver. One hundred and fifty-four pivot shift examinations were performed on cadavers with various degrees of instability, and 24 pivot shift exams were performed on patients under anesthesia before and after ACL reconstruction. In all positive pivot shift exams, anterior tibial translations were found to be higher on in the lateral compartment compared to the medial compartment. In addition, an excellent correlation was found between the amount of lateral compartment translation and the clinical grade of the pivot shift; medial compartment translations and amount of knee rotation could not distinguish between clinical grades. Finally, a threshold of 6-7 mm of anterior tibial translation in the lateral compartment was necessary to produce a positive pivot shift. Taken together, these data suggest that monitoring lateral compartment translations during a pivot shift exam may be a convenient means to evaluate the outcomes of ACL surgery and that requisite increases in anterior translation of the lateral compartment are necessary for each progressive clinical grade of the pivot shift examination.

A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical differences between anatomical double-bundle and central single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the same graft tissue have not been defined.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare these reconstructions in their ability to restore native knee kinematics during a reproducible Lachman and pivot-shift examination.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Using a computer-assisted navigation system, 10 paired knees were subjected to biomechanical testing with a standardized Lachman and mechanized pivot-shift examination. The navigation system recorded the 3D motion path of a tracked point at the center of the tibia, center of the medial tibial plateau, and center of the lateral tibial plateau with each maneuver. The testing protocol consisted of evaluation in the intact state, after complete anterior cruciate ligament transection, after medial and lateral meniscectomy, and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with (1) a single-bundle center-center or (2) anatomical double-bundle technique. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with a post hoc Tukey test was used to compare the measured translations with each test condition.

RESULTS

A significant difference in anterior translation was seen with Lachman examination between the anterior cruciate ligament- and medial and lateral meniscus-deficient condition compared with both the double-bundle and single-bundle center-center anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (P < .001); no significant difference was observed between reconstructions. The double-bundle construct was significantly better in limiting anterior translation of the lateral compartment compared with the single-bundle reconstruction during a pivot-shift maneuver (2.0 +/- 5.7 mm vs 7.8 +/- 1.8 mm, P < .001) and was not significantly different than the intact anterior cruciate ligament condition (2.7 mm +/- 4.7 mm, P > .05).

DISCUSSION

Although double-bundle and single-bundle, center-center anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions appear equally effective in controlling anterior translation during a Lachman examination, analysis of pivot-shift kinematics reveals significant differences between these surgical reconstructions. An altered rotational axis resulted in significantly greater translation of the lateral compartment in the single-bundle compared with double-bundle reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may be a favorable construct for restoration of knee kinematics in the at-risk knee with associated meniscal injuries and/or significant pivot shift on preoperative examination.

Computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based approach of the first 15 years

In the last 15 years, computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been used for many purposes during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, such as tunnel positioning, joint laxity evaluation, and biomechanical studies. This article is an evidence-based literature review of the contribution of such technology to ACL surgery. A search of the PubMed and Medline databases was performed. Articles were classified according to the study design and to the research topic: anatomy, laxity, kinematics, and comparison of surgical techniques. An evidence-based approach was used to verify the clinical usefulness of CAS to ACL surgery. The use of CAS for research purposes was also evaluated. CAS was shown to improve femoral tunnel positioning, even if clinical outcomes showed no differences compared with manual techniques. CAS technology was found to be useful for research purposes in terms of providing a better comprehension of the effect of different ACL reconstructions and of the different bundles on joint laxity, as well as describing tunnel positioning in relation to native ACL insertion. CAS in ACL surgery can improve results at time 0 and can improve knowledge about ACL anatomy and kinematics. Its application remains limited mostly to research purposes because of the invasiveness of the system and the absence of improved clinical results at follow-up.

Navigation system measures AP and rotational knee laxity in ACL replacement

We used a non-image-based navigation system to measure anterior and rotational laxity during anterior cruciate ligament replacement. The preoperative and postoperative navigated measurements of anterior laxity were compared with the preoperative and postoperative stress radiographs. There was a significant difference between these 2 measurements, but they were significantly correlated. Navigated anterior laxity measurement can therefore be considered reliable. The intraoperative information about the correction of the anterior laxity may have relevance in controlling the quality of the procedure and improving reproducibility. Information about rotational laxity may be helpful, but its exact significance must be more precisely defined.