Biomechanical optimization of the diameter of distraction screw in distraction implant by three-dimensional finite element analysis

Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis - A systematic review

Background

Various attachments like ball, bar-clip, magnetic attachments are used in implant supported overdentures. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) a newly innovated technology has been used in dental implantology to evaluate stress distribution patterns. There is little evidence available regarding the stress distribution in peri-implant region for implant supported overdentures. The purpose of the review was to generate scientific evidence on peri-implant stress distribution in FEA model with different types of attachments employed in implant supported overdentures.

Materials and methods

Systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Guidelines and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was undertaken by two reviewers from January 2020 to June 2020 with no year limits to published articles. Only in-vitro FEA studies were included. Following electronic databases were searched for published studies- PubMed, Web of Science. Characteristics of the studies tabulated and analysis of articles was done to compare different attachment systems.

Results

Locator attachments showed better stress distribution than ball attachment system in all the studies but one. Two studies showed results in favour of ball attachment compared to bar-clip attachment system when stress was evaluated distal to the implants. No significant difference in terms of stress concentration could be generated between ball versus magnetic/equator versus locator attachment system due to less number of studies and conflicting results.

Conclusion

Various studies showed different results due to heterogenicity in selected attachment systems and study designs. Locator attachments showed favourable stress distribution around peri-implant bone than other attachments.

The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intra-oral Distractors and the Extra-oral Distractors Used in Treatment of Post Ankylosis Facial Asymmetric Patients: A Finite Element Analysis Study

ABSTRACT

Assessment of stress and micromotions using finite element analysis along both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of post temporomandibular joint ankylosis deformed mandible patients. The process of finite element analysis was carried out to assess distraction models. The first model was an extraoral mandibular distraction model and the second model was an intraoral mandibular distraction model. To analyze the stress state, 2 vertical loads were applied on the defective and normal side respectively by a 3D finite element ball model. The intraoral system observed lower stress (4.5 MPa) in the mandibular bone compared to the extra-oral system (11.5 MPa). The results revealed that the intraoral system observed higher stress on the distractor fixing points (392.21 MPa) compared to the extra-oral fixing points (12.62 MPa). The results revealed that the extra-oral system reflected higher displacement on the bone surrounding the screws of about 3720 μm compared to the intraoral system 1414.6 μm. Internal devices give better shielding to the bone and induce fewer stresses over the mandibular, so it is more advisable to be used. The external devices permit greater distraction length because the pins and the distractor main body are subjected to fewer stresses.

The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intraoral Distractors and the Extraoral Distractors Used in Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia Patients: A Simulation Finite Element Analysis Study

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

Finite element analysis of the stresses subjected to both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of hemifacial microsomia patients.

METHODOLOGY

Two models were included in the current study. The first model was an extraoral distractor and the second model was an intraoral distractor model. To generate the results in the simulated models; 2 vertical loads were applied (222.7 and 137.78 N) on the defective and normal side, respectively.

RESULTS

The intraoral system observed lower stress (6.85 MPa) in the mandibular bone compared to the extraoral system (13.21 MPa). The intraoral distractor had a higher stress concentration on the distractor fixing screws (352 MPa) compared to the extraoral distractor fixing pins (15 MPa). The extraoral distractor had a higher displacement effect on the mandibular bone around the pins of 263.35 μm in comparison to the intraoral distractor effect which was 77.87 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal oral distractor provides a sort of stress shielding to the distracted bone and less displacement, so it is more advisable to be used in general. The external devices are advised only in extralong distraction distance because the distractor is subjected to lower stresses compared to intraoral counterparts.

Design methodology for dental implant using approximate solution techniques

With the developing technology, dental implants have been widely used in recent years. These implants are surgically implanted into a jaw bone to support missing teeth. Implants are usually made of titanium and are biocompatible. The design and analysis of the dental implant is based on expert knowledge, experience and ability to work seamlessly on the patient. Due to the difficulties in performing dental implant tests in vivo, the geometric shape design of the dental implant must be performed before it is applied to a patient and mathematical models have been developed to perform structural analysis. In this study, a design strategy for dental implant design was proposed. In this proposed strategy, finite element analysis, numerical optimization method and probabilistic design approach Monte Carlo simulation are integrated to work together automatically.

Influence of a micro-thread at cervical position and a cylindrical intermediate zone on the mechanical behaviour of dental implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

The purpose of this work is to analyse the influence on the biomechanical behaviour of dental implants of a micro-thread at their cervical part as well as of a cylindrical geometry at an intermediate zone. Stresses and strains in the elements involved, that is, bone, implant, screw and abutment, have to be considered in detail. Three different three-dimensional finite element models are generated to analyse the behaviour of the various components under the so-called tightening and operating conditions. For the modelling, material specifications for the cancellous bone and cortical bone, on one hand, and titanium properties for the implant, screw and abutment, on the other, are implemented. The tightening condition was fixed according to the stresses in the screw. The operating conditions were simulated by applying a force of 150 N, taking into account ISO 14801:2007 standard. The maximum stress under tightening conditions occurs always in the screw, while under operating conditions it is produced at the screw or the abutment, although considerable stress values are also present in the implant. In all the models, the maximum stress at the junction between the implant and the bone occurs within the cortical bone. Implants provided with micro-thread at the cervical position are advantageous over homogeneously threaded implants since lower stresses in both the implant and the adjacent bone are produced. A cylindrical intermediate portion on the implant surface does not present special advantage over the implants with continuous external thread under tightening and operating conditions.

Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry

The finite element analysis (FEA) is an upcoming and significant research tool for biomechanical analyses in biological research. It is an ultimate method for modeling complex structures and analyzing their mechanical properties. In Implantology, FEA has been used to study the stress patterns in various implant components and also in the peri-implant bone. It is also useful for studying the biomechanical properties of implants as well as for predicting the success of implants in clinical condition. FEA of simulated traumatic loads can be used to understand the biomechanics of fracture. FEA has various advantages compared with studies on real models. The experiments are repeatable, there are no ethical considerations and the study designs may be modified and changed as per the requirement. There are certain limitations of FEA too. It is a computerized in vitro study in which clinical condition may not be completely replicated. So, further FEA research should be supplemented with clinical evaluation.